"Our situation". Vast distances, arctic zone and long winter

120
"Our situation". Vast distances, arctic zone and long winter
Map of the administrative division of Russia in 1914. A. Ilyin. New educational geographical atlas for the full gymnasium course, consisting of 38 maps (1914-1917)


Russia's strategic position


In 1912, the geopolitical work "Our Position" was published. Its author was a Russian officer, intelligence officer Alexei Efimovich Vandam (Edrikhin).



The main provisions of his work have remained relevant to this day. Vandam-Edrikhin quite rightly noted that despite the large size of their territory, the Russian people, compared to other peoples, are in the least favorable conditions for life.

Vast distances, the Arctic zone and long winter. No access to warm seas with access to world communications. All this slows down the development of the national economy, forcing us to spend a lot of money and effort just to survive. That is, due to our geographical location, our people are doomed to a closed and poor, unsatisfactory existence.

The Russian writer Andrei Parshev came to the same conclusions in the 1990s. In his book “Why Russia is not America” (1999), he proved that Russia is not competitive in the world market due to the peculiarities of Russian geography (vast territories) and climate (low average annual temperature). Therefore, inclusion in the world market is a strategic mistake.

Russia simply cannot compete in the world market with warm (average annual temperature) Europe, the USA, China, Brazil, Japan, South Korea, India, etc. The only way to build a successful and developed society is not to integrate into the world market, but to create its own (partial autarky), prohibit the export of capital, etc. That is, what they did in the USSR (taking into account the mistakes). Russian global project.

"To the sun and warm water"


An unsatisfactory existence led to the people instinctively striving for "sun and warm water." Interestingly, this subconscious desire has persisted to this day. As soon as the state reduced support measures and curtailed the country's development program in the 1990s, an outflow of population began from the North, from Siberia and the Far East to the more developed part of the country, to the south.

In the rear of Russia there is the ice of the Arctic Ocean, the Baltic Sea is half-closed by European powers, in the west there are developed and populous European powers. Therefore, Russia could grow to the east and south. At the same time, in the middle of the southern front there are deserts of Mongolia and Turkestan, unsuitable for life. Therefore, Russian expansion could develop not along the entire front line, as the Russian intelligence officer and writer Vandam noted, but "flanks and primarily the right flank closest to the center of state power", through the Caucasus and the Black Sea to the Mediterranean and the Persian Gulf.

However, such expansion of Russia (Russian globalization) did not meet the interests of England, which dominated the seas and was extremely skillful in creating its global empire, pitting its competitors against each other. Therefore, despite brilliant military victories over the Turks, Persians, tribes of the Caucasus and Turkestan, we suffered a failure in this theater of struggle for the life of Russian civilization.

In many ways, this was due to the serious mistakes of the Romanovs. Petersburg was unable to solve the problem of spreading Russian influence to the Balkans (ceding them to Austria, Germany, England and France), occupy Constantinople and the strait zone with the Bosphorus and Dardanelles (although there were opportunities), or include all of Persia in its sphere of influence. Ultimately, this ended in the disaster of the Romanov project in 1914-1917.

Russian America


On the eastern flank, Yermak began in the 16th century by annexing Siberia. Russian freemen stretched north and east, to riches – furs and “fish teeth” (walrus tusk). These were then the most expensive export goods of the Russian state. In pursuit of this prey, the Russians reached the Pacific Ocean, Kamchatka.

In the 1741th century, Russian sailors from Semyon Dezhnev's expedition discovered America (Alaska). Russian explorers visited America several more times. In XNUMX, Bering's expedition on two packet boats, "Saint Peter" (Bering) and "Saint Paul" (Chirikov), explored the Aleutian Islands and the shores of Alaska.

The first scouts, who reported lands rich in animals, and especially the "sea beaver" (sea otter), were followed by industrialists and merchants. The Russians quickly developed a profitable trade in Alaska and the Aleutian Islands.

However, competitors soon appeared – foreigners, primarily the British and Americans. They exterminated the precious sea otter, got the natives drunk, sold them firearms weapon, set them against the Russians.

Russian explorer and merchant Grigory Ivanovich Shelikhov (1749–1795) was the man who not only understood the situation but also found a way to secure our position in America. He united all the independent Russian companies into one strong company. In 1791, Shelikhov founded the North-Eastern Company, which in 1799 was transformed into the Russian-American Trading Company (RAC).

The main thing is that he decided to expand Russian possessions on the unclaimed northwestern coast of America from the Bering Strait to Spanish California (Russian America Shelikhova and Baranova). Develop trade, bring Hawaii under control. Create a Russian base fleet, which will protect Russian interests in the Pacific Ocean.

Shelikhov himself did not live to see the implementation of his plan. His work was continued by his closest friend and assistant, the "Russian Pizarro" Alexander Andreevich Baranov (1747-1819). He became the main ruler of Russian America, and in 1799 he founded Fort Novoarkhangelsk on Sitka Island. In 1812, by order of Baranov, a Russian trading post was founded in California - Fort Ross.

The Russian population grew. Trade relations between Russian settlements in Russian America and Spanish California, Hawaii and China expanded significantly. New settlements and fortifications were created. New expeditions were conducted. The English had to leave Russian waters, the Americans, feeling their strength, began to cooperate with us.

As Vandam noted:

"Baranov did for Russia what no mere mortal could do. He conquered and brought her as a gift the entire northern half of the Pacific Ocean, which he effectively turned into a "Russian Lake", and on the other side of this ocean, an entire empire equal to half of European Russia, which began to be populated by Russians and provided with fortifications, arsenals and workshops..."

Unfortunately, envy and slander brought down the Russian titan. Baranov was suspected of theft and removed from his post in 1818. Although this great Russian statesman and patriot was distinguished by his selflessness:

"When the affairs were handed over, all the company property that was considered to be in place was found not only in perfect order, but even in a quantity that exceeded that indicated in the inventories. The size of the unexpected excess is impressive; they expected to find property worth 4 rubles, but it was found to be worth seven million. All the ill-wishers who had been spreading rumors for many years that Baranov was quietly getting rich immediately bit their tongues..."


The Strategic Failure of the Romanovs


With the departure of this great man, the heroic period of exploration of the northern part of the Pacific Ocean and Russian America ended. The Russians were forced to retreat before the British and Americans (Anglo-Saxons).

The government of Alexander I, concentrating on European affairs, missed the opportunity to establish Russian dominance in the northern part of the Pacific Ocean. A holy place is never empty. Seeing that the Russians had stopped their pressure, the English and Americans began their expansion. The English again began to move into our fishing region, and the Americans followed them.

In 1823, American President Monroe proclaimed the doctrine that they regarded the continent discovered by the Spanish, French and Russians as their own property. The USA and England, which had not yet reached the Rocky Mountains (the main mountain range in the Cordillera system of North America in the west of the continent), from whose range the Russian land began to the west, demanded that Russia delimit its possessions.

In 1824, a Russian-American convention was signed, which was in the interests of the United States. In 1825, an Anglo-Russian convention, according to which St. Petersburg simply renounced the lands that belonged to us. Of our possessions on the American continent, only one third remained with us (Alaska), two thirds were ceded to the Anglo-Saxons without any compensation.

After this, the profitable fur trade, which had previously been a Russian monopoly, passes into the hands of British and American merchants. Having lost its economic base, the RAC reduces its trading posts and fleet. Russia slowly returns to Kamchatka.

As in the war, our competitors and enemies followed the retreating Russians. Western merchants crossed over to the western shores of the Pacific Ocean. Their flotillas appeared in the Bering and Okhotsk Seas. It got to the point that American whalers behaved as if they were at home in Petropavlovsk.

The Anglo-Saxons gain a foothold in China. They discover Japan under gunpoint and turn it into their "battering ram" aimed at the Celestial Empire and Russia. In 1841, Fort Ross is sold, in 1867 – all of Russian America. The Americans seize Hawaii.

Thus, Petersburg cedes Russian America and dominance in the northern part of the Pacific Ocean. Our competitors (the Anglo-Saxons) are gaining a foothold at Russia's Far Eastern borders. They are creating bridgeheads to cut the Russians off from the Pacific Ocean altogether. At this time, the Romanov government spends all its time and energy on European affairs. All this will lead to the complete geostrategic defeat of Romanov Russia.


Holy Trinity Orthodox Chapel of St. Nicholas in Fort Ross, Sonoma County, California. The chapel is part of the state historical Fort Ross Park
120 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +14
    2 October 2024 05: 58
    It is easy to criticize the tsars for ceding American colonies - but how could they be protected and supplied in the event of a war with England? Our fleet could not compete with the British. I think Russia would have lost them anyway, just as Spain, France, and Holland lost their colonies... Too little transport connectivity, too weak a fleet...
    1. +8
      2 October 2024 06: 08
      Quote: paul3390
      It is easy to criticize the tsars for the concessions of the American colonies - but how were they to be protected and supplied in the event of a war with England?
      With the transport infrastructure that existed in Eastern Siberia and the Far East at that time, Siberia and the Far East could easily have been lost. I can only remind you of the completion date of the Chinese Eastern Railway and the very next event - the highway from Chita to Khabarovsk, which Putin opened...
      1. +6
        2 October 2024 06: 15
        And who was threatening us then in Siberia? No matter how antediluvian the communications there were, there was no one to intercept them. But the ocean - alas, we certainly did not control it in those days... As is the case now. What colonies in America - even the French and Dutch, who were noticeably more advanced in maritime affairs, were driven out of overseas lands...
        1. +4
          2 October 2024 06: 18
          Quote: paul3390
          And who was threatening us then in Siberia? No matter how ancient the communications there were, there was no one to intercept them. But the ocean - alas, we certainly did not own it in those days

          Communications would be captured by those who owned the ocean. And it would be all the same to them whether they took over Alaska, Siberia or China...
        2. +2
          2 October 2024 17: 12
          "And who threatened us then in Siberia?" - the Japanese. Remember the story with the CER.
    2. +3
      2 October 2024 18: 46
      It is easy to blame the tsars for the concessions of the American colonies
      - and there is nothing to praise them for - the people themselves went to new lands, away from the sovereigns, for a free life, without any special support measures.
    3. +3
      2 October 2024 19: 40
      So Russia and Primorye with Kamchatka, in the same 19th century, had nothing to defend - you suggest they should have been sold? laughing
  2. +6
    2 October 2024 06: 15
    The reasons for selling Alaska were purely economic. RAC transported furs from Alaska to China, where it bought tea, which it sold in Russia. Then the population of fur animals decreased, and the Opium Wars began in China and the demand for luxury goods collapsed.
  3. +22
    2 October 2024 06: 24
    Unfortunately, today's bourgeoisie in their mad pursuit of profit at any price do not want to understand the main thing - for such a huge country, transport connectivity and accessibility are a matter of life or death. On a daily basis - if the residents of Kamchatka cannot afford to take their children to the Kremlin and the Hermitage, or fly to Crimea on vacation, then in just a generation the local population will simply stop identifying itself with the native Russia. With all the sad consequences that follow. And all this will happen solely because of the greed and stupidity of today's rulers, who take into account nothing but money.
    1. +8
      2 October 2024 08: 15
      if the residents of Kamchatka cannot afford to take their children to Crimea and the Hermitage

      And indeed it is! hi Pavel, you are absolutely right! I somehow didn’t think about it, but remembering childhood and adult conversations about trips recourse Yes! That's exactly how it was! True, we went on vacation once every 2 or 3 years. But it was always with a big program. For example ---- to visit parents for a month and then to Leningrad or Moscow. Of course, some went abroad, but in geology there were many who were not allowed to leave
      1. +13
        2 October 2024 09: 47
        That's how it was, as a child I traveled from Yakutia across half the Union on various travel packages
        1. +5
          2 October 2024 09: 55
          Good day! wink hi Before school I lived with my parents in the Far East. But they ----- much earlier, they came by assignment right after University. I don't remember about vouchers, I was little, probably forgot these words, didn't understand. But someone went to socialist countries. Of course, on vouchers. Cuba and Vietnam were closer.
      2. +9
        2 October 2024 10: 19
        When I was little, every summer relatives from all over the Soviet Union would fly to visit us in St. Petersburg, from Magadan to Yaroslavl. What really pissed me off was that I had to sleep in a closet on a folding bed and the house turned into some kind of camp...
        In his youth, he went on a journey around the country.
        Now - I haven't seen my relatives from the Far East for 30 years, at least there are social networks... It's not affordable to fly to visit relatives. With the money they have, they prefer to go on vacation somewhere closer. As far as I know, the children of my second and third cousins ​​have never been to Moscow or St. Petersburg... Alas.
        1. +5
          2 October 2024 12: 06
          Children of my second and third cousins

          It turns out that the connections between relatives are somehow weakened due to distances. Social networks are one thing, but communication is -----
          it's different request
        2. -2
          5 October 2024 08: 30
          Instead of our own, we bring Chinese people to St. Petersburg... fool
    2. +7
      2 October 2024 11: 43
      Quote: paul3390
      On a daily level - if the residents of Kamchatka cannot afford to take their children to the Kremlin and the Hermitage,... .

      What can I say, Kamchatka? Visiting museums even without a road is a hole in the family budget these days. Look at the ticket prices.
      True, there is an alternative. wink
      For example.
      In one of the oldest villages of Meshchera, originating somewhere in the depths of centuries, like in the 13-14th, in which there are only about 15 churches, they were surprised by the visitor. As a result, for a symbolic price (I think about five rubles) I had a personal excursion. wink
      1. +2
        2 October 2024 17: 17
        Three weeks ago, similarly, the three of us, the only visitors to the Bestuzhev-Marlinsky Museum in Derbent, were led around for over an hour by a tour guide for a symbolic 100 rubles.
        1. +1
          2 October 2024 18: 29
          Quote: Sergey Valov
          the three of us, the only visitors to the Bestuzhev-Marlinsky Museum in Derbent, were led around by a tour guide for over an hour

          Do you happen to have any photos of the Derbent wall going into the water? I've been to Dagestan often, but I've never managed to get to Derbent...
          1. +1
            2 October 2024 19: 24
            Unfortunately, I haven't been to the embankment in Derbent, it's quite a long and inconvenient walk there, the railway tracks are in the way, and I lived next to the citadel. I highly recommend visiting Derbent, and not with a tour, but on your own and for at least two days, we were there for four. Derbent has been put in order in recent years, the citadel and the old town have been beautifully restored, a magnificent musical fountain has been built, and a pedestrian promenade has been created along the northern wall.
        2. +1
          3 October 2024 01: 11
          Quote: Sergey Valov
          Three weeks ago, similarly... .

          Quote: 16112014nk
          I was with my wife at the Stalin Headquarters Museum in the village of Khoroshevo near Rzhev.

          I understand that the cultural and educational activities of museums are only part of their work.
          But.
          There are few visitors in the "small" museums, but I have seen the sincerity of the workers, patriots, I dare say, of their region. In the capital's "large" museums, it seems that the "cheating" of tourists has become the basis of scientific work.
          Ah, but it would seem that the state is interested in the growth of patriotism. It's like with roads. The country is big. There should be many good roads. But the government's decision was to look into the pockets of citizens with the help of toll roads.
          Well, here it is.
          "Payment for travel on Bagration Avenue in Moscow: questions and answers.
          ... Thanks to this, you can get from the Moscow Ring Road to Moscow-City in 15 minutes with comfort even during the morning rush hour.
          ...The fare depends on the height of the car and the method of payment. The most advantageous is with the "Main Road" transponder: 416 rubles for cars up to 2 meters high, 624 rubles for cars from 2 to 2,6 m and 836 rubles for cars higher than 2,6 m. With transponders of other operators, the fare will cost 570, 855 and 1140 rubles, and if there is no transponder at all - 600, 900 and 1200 rubles, respectively. If the car has a trailer, the maximum height will be taken into account. But the price does not depend on the mileage and the point of entry and exit to the highway."

          There is a photo of an empty road. It seems that even for Moscow such prices are high.
      2. 0
        2 October 2024 18: 18
        I was with my wife at the Stalin Headquarters Museum in the village of Khoroshevo near Rzhev. There were only the two of us and the museum director. Tickets cost 30 rubles. We were there about 5 years ago.
        1. +1
          3 October 2024 09: 33
          In Belgorod, entrance fees are inexpensive, both in the city itself and near Prokhorovka, I won't lie, but definitely pennies and I can't say that there are few visitors. And here in Crimea it is expensive, if we talk about the hyped centers.
      3. 0
        5 October 2024 07: 44
        Excuse me, but by five rubles do you mean exactly the modern five rubles? Because in today's slang this can mean five thousand. Or are you still talking about the Soviet era, meaning the five rubles of that time?
        1. 0
          5 October 2024 12: 01
          Quote from Fenix844
          Or are you still talking about the Soviet era, meaning the five rubles of that time?

          wink
          In Soviet times, ticket prices were measured in kopecks. Except for theaters and concerts - in rubles.
    3. 0
      2 October 2024 21: 22
      Quote: paul3390
      On a daily basis - if the residents of Kamchatka cannot afford to take their children to the Kremlin and the Hermitage, or fly to Crimea on vacation

      They came to visit us from Sakhalin. Once every two years, travel across Russia to the Central regions and the south is free. For residents of the far North and equivalent regions of the country. Once every two years, plane and train tickets will be free.
    4. 0
      3 October 2024 09: 26
      That's right, I myself was born and raised in Crimea and we had children from Kamchatka, I know from pioneer camps, from Ekibastuz, from everywhere.
    5. 0
      8 October 2024 17: 28
      I have always been surprised how the residents of Kamchatka (and many other regions) identify themselves with central Russia! Most of them will never visit sacred places that are significant for us. What Crimea - I would like to go to Vladivostok to warm up!!! Thanks to the Internet, now you can at least see, but not touch!
      With a time difference of 8 hours, their day is already ending when all the action starts here. How did they watch the Football Championship, the Sochi Olympics, our May 9th Parade? Did they get up at night to watch?
  4. +7
    2 October 2024 06: 57
    I have already written about these (or rather two and a half) lost oceans in my comments. Thanks to the Tsar-Traitor (cynically called "Liberator") we have lost half of the Pacific Ocean. Maintaining and expanding our possessions in the Asia-Pacific region is a question of our survival in the global competition. The upcoming mess in the Pacific Ocean gives us our last chance.
    But sitting by the water we won’t see any enemy corpses.
    It is necessary to prepare and, having forestalled the enemy, to begin first. And the first, irresistible blow should be the unification of Korea under the wise leadership of Kim Jong-un. After this, the "unsinkable aircraft carrier" of the USA - Japan will become a very disadvantageous asset, since the USA and its allies will have to forget about dominance in the Yellow, Japanese and South China Seas.
    1. 0
      2 October 2024 17: 39
      But Kim Jong-un is not our son of a pike, but a Chinese one. Will it turn out that we will be pulling chestnuts out of the fire for China?
      1. +1
        2 October 2024 17: 46
        United Korea is far from being North, and the country's authority determines the status of relations. There was Kim, and now there is the Great Son of the Great People - a historical figure even on a global scale. Well, and the Koreans look askance at all their neighbors except us, so for us it is the most reasonable thing.
  5. +6
    2 October 2024 07: 01
    Russia should not close itself off. It should surround itself with two belts: a near (border) belt of allies and a distant one of neutral countries. At the same time, it is necessary to strive to secure allies with mutual interest and involvement in its projects, and not with shouts. It is more difficult with a strip of neutrals: here it is necessary to closely monitor their policies and entice them with the super-benefit of neutrality.
  6. +7
    2 October 2024 07: 25
    There were two articles: "Why Russia is not America" ​​and "When was Alaska sold?"
  7. +12
    2 October 2024 07: 28
    Russia simply cannot compete on the world market with warm (average annual temperature) Europe, the USA, China, Brazil, Japan, South Korea, India, etc.

    Wow! It's impossible to compete even with Brazil, where, as Aunt Rosa said, there are a lot of wild monkeys. And does Canada belong to this "etc."? A large, sparsely populated northern country, one of the most developed in the world? :((
    1. +2
      2 October 2024 09: 26
      And how are you going to compete with the economically "powerful" country Brazil? If this "Upon handing over of affairs all the company property considered to be present was found not only in perfect order, but even in quantity exceeding that indicated in the inventories. The size of the unexpected excess is impressive, they expected to find property for 4 rubles, but it was found for seven million" is still considered affairs going in perfect order. Canada is not an indicator, with all our resettlement programs we will not be able to bring so many Canadians that they would gain a critical mass.
  8. +2
    2 October 2024 07: 42
    The strategic mistake of the tsars was not in this at all, but in the excessive geographical expansion of Russia. We spent resources on holding territories inhabited by alien peoples - for example, Poland and Finland. The Port Arthur adventure turned out to be fatal, after it Russia only shrank.
    1. +4
      2 October 2024 17: 26
      "in the excessive geographical expansion of Russia" - and how else can one secure one's own borders from extremely unfriendly neighbors? It has never been possible to make allies out of the Poles. The Caucasian highlanders didn't give a damn about any treaties. The Central Asian emirs behaved similarly. Only the liquidation of armed national formations in these territories and the placement of one's own garrisons there made it possible to secure the borders.
    2. 0
      3 October 2024 09: 50
      We also received resources, for example Polish coal. And potatoes grow in Poland in a way that they don't grow in Ukraine, and in Russia, well, there are almost none by Polish standards.
    3. 0
      3 October 2024 13: 23
      Poland made Poles of everyone on its entire territory, we don't do that. This strategic mistake was, is and will be. The tsars had enough time to do it peacefully and without haste, without violence against the local population.
  9. +2
    2 October 2024 08: 01
    At this time, the Romanov government spends all its time and energy on European affairs. All this will lead to the complete geostrategic defeat of Romanov Russia.

    the author should at least open a history textbook: all this time Russia has been annexing, building, populating Turkestan, Transcaucasia, Southern Siberia, the Amur region, Primorsky Krai - this is many millions of km2.

    The author simply did not have the strength to mourn America: in the best times of Russian America there was...less than a thousand Russians-there's nothing to talk about, I just didn't have the strength-

    In total, 75% of Russia's territory was created under the Romanovs.
    1. UAT
      +3
      2 October 2024 09: 58
      In total, 75% of Russia's territory was created under the Romanovs.

      And what then, as Siberia, did Yermak conquer under Ivan the Terrible?
      1. +3
        2 October 2024 10: 05
        Well, maybe it's something else lol ........
      2. +2
        2 October 2024 11: 15
        Quote: UAT
        And what then, as Siberia, did Yermak conquer under Ivan the Terrible?

        open "the territory of Rus' under Ivan the Terrible", where you will find out that it was 5,1 million sq. km, under the Romanovs 2 million sq. km.
        1. UAT
          -1
          2 October 2024 13: 06
          Thanks for the answer with numbers and source.
  10. +11
    2 October 2024 08: 05
    Russia simply cannot compete on the world market with warm (average annual temperature) Europe, the USA, China, Brazil, Japan, South Korea, India, etc.

    The presence of huge amounts of energy resources in Russia puts it in the position of Israel in the desert, where the main problem is the lack of water.
    Using existing energy sources and creating new ones would allow Russia to establish many small cities with developed infrastructure, rather than being confined to the Moscow Ring Road. But such a path of development does not presuppose private ownership of energy resources and minerals.
    Without socialist relations, Russia turned into a feeding trough for local bourgeois and a raw materials appendage of the West.
    1. UAT
      -3
      2 October 2024 10: 04
      Without socialist relations, Russia turned into a feeding trough for local bourgeois and a raw materials appendage of the West.

      Respected Ross xnumx, replace "local bourgeois" with "party nomenklatura" in this sentence, start the sentence with the word "Russia" and you will get a completely correct sentence describing our country from the beginning of the 1970s, and maybe even the 60s.
      1. +2
        2 October 2024 20: 44
        The remark is very subjective and completely wrong. No matter how much one criticizes the party nomenclature of the USSR, it formed the informational skeleton of society – its own!, and not borrowed, as today – due to creative failure. That is why there was a multipolar! world. Today, our “elite” has dragged Russia into a unipolar world, the organizers of which will never recognize us as equals and will always look for an opportunity to assimilate the wealth of Russia.
        1. UAT
          -1
          2 October 2024 21: 21
          Respected Alexander Ra, and what is
          informational backbone of society

          Today our "elite" has dragged Russia into a unipolar world

          This happened a little earlier, in 1992. And it was done by the party nomenklatura with the support of the Soviet people. The reason that made such a sharp turn in the history of our country possible is quite obvious. Socialism in the form that was built in the USSR by all the people under the leadership of their own, home-grown,
          not borrowed
          party nomenklatura, lost the economic competition to the West outright (by knockout, to use a boxing analogy). The main milestones of this loss were the transition to the position of a net importer of grain (early 1960s) and the addiction to hydrocarbon exports (early 1970s) with a logical end in the 1980s. The reasons can be discussed long and hard. But the result is unambiguous and speaks for itself. Our own model of socialism lost the economic competition.
          And the end of your tragic comment about the organizers of the unipolar world
          they do not recognize us as equals and will always seek an opportunity to assimilate the wealth of Russia
          .
          It's as if you haven't studied history, haven't tried to understand it somehow. The world is harsh and the weak are devoured at once. Russia itself, having lost to the West, took the place of the weak. Now the situation has begun to change. The country's leadership realizes that continuing the policy of the 1990s will inevitably lead us to death. Hence Putin's ultimatum on Ukraine.
          This is all, of course, my subjective opinion. I am sure that you will find it incorrect. But, in that case, take the trouble to argue reasonably against each thesis. Thank you in advance.
          1. +2
            2 October 2024 21: 47
            …the skeleton is simple but clear – construction instructions.
            ... dragged Russia into a unipolar world - the "construction instructions" of capital Russia were generated by the West, which leads the unipolar world, and in the 90s.
            party nomenklatura with the support of the Soviet people
            carried out literacy training, industrialized the country, won the war, restored the national economy. Thus, it ensured a peaceful life for several generations.
            The country's leadership realizes that continuing the policies of the 1990s will inevitably lead us to destruction.
            - a misconception. "There will be no revision of the privatization results." The sabotage of the Belovezhskaya conspiracy has not been condemned or denounced. - this is a Ukrainian trap. They have not even begun to solve the Ukrainian problem at its root.
            1. UAT
              0
              2 October 2024 22: 14
              That is, the party nomenclature, which is first and foremost a certain set of people, is this an instruction? Sorry, but you need to be more careful with your words. People cannot be an instruction.
              You object to my specific thesis about who dragged our country into capitalism.
              "construction manual" of the Russian capital generated by the West

              It doesn't matter who wrote the manuals, what matters is who did the work.
              Next, you list the achievements of the nomenklatura and the Soviet people. That is, you choose a flawed logic. "Yes, the defendant killed 100 people for no reason, but he is a good person and has excellent work records." Let me remind you that you are trying to use achievements to dispute the unfortunate fact that it was the actions of the nomenklatura that led to the collapse of the country.
              You realize that your objection has nothing to do with the thesis you are challenging.
              You completely ignored my thesis about the USSR losing in the economic competition. And this, by the way, is 100% the fault of the nomenklatura.
              There is no point in further analyzing your helpless argumentation. Please calm down and answer me on the merits. That text of yours that I have just commented on demonstrates your disrespect not only for me, but also for yourself. Let's do it this way. If you find the strength to object to me on the merits, we will continue our so-called discussion. If not, then we will stop.
              1. 0
                3 October 2024 07: 32
                On
                It doesn't matter who wrote the manuals, what matters is who did the work.
                Science describes everything around us in terms of information, energy, and matter. Information is the most important thing in this triad. According to your logic, it doesn't matter in Ukraine why mass spiritual deformity occurred? Until recently, they were compatriots, their own, building and fighting together, and suddenly, solely through their own fault, they became Nazi enemies? Who, taught from an early age to "cut the Russians" - won't grow up a Nazi?
                It was the actions of the nomenklatura that led to the collapse of the country.
                Where was the majority of the people, why are you hushing up the inaction of the majority? If you undertake to judge the party nomenklatura, then judge the entire people, what is there to be ashamed of?
                1. UAT
                  +1
                  3 October 2024 08: 53
                  You continue to agitate yourself. And don't make far-reaching dubious conclusions from my thesis. Challenge the thesis. And you can't do anything about it.
                  It was the actions of the nomenklatura that led to the collapse of the country.
                  Where was the majority of the people, why are you hushing up the inaction of the majority? If you undertake to judge the party nomenklatura, then judge the entire people, what is there to be ashamed of?

                  The next step you will suggest is that I condemn Marx, the entire population of the Earth and the aliens as well. Thank you. That's all for now.
          2. +1
            3 October 2024 13: 38
            UAT. (Alexey)
            "And it was done by the party nomenklatura with the support of the Soviet people"
            So, without the people, you can't get anywhere, that's how it was and that's how it is. Recently, the people supported raising the retirement age, and even earlier, the privatization of factories, newspapers, and steamships. The people are always ready to support both price increases and tax increases. That's why they are the people, and not an official with a specific last name and first name. The people are always right, their logic is impeccable.
            1. UAT
              +1
              3 October 2024 14: 30
              Respected Sergei Fonov, you will also write that in 1962 in Novocherkassk people took to the streets in support of reducing the supply of bread to stores.
              1. +1
                3 October 2024 17: 33
                UAT
                That's what I wrote about. With the support of the people, the army, on Yeltsin's orders, fired tanks at the parliament. Whatever you say, we have this old, good tradition of doing everything at the request of the workers, about whom, well, these same workers, are the last to know. But after the train has left, it's impossible to understand who those workers were whose request they fulfilled, and where to look for them.
                1. UAT
                  0
                  3 October 2024 18: 20
                  Respected Sergei Fonov, "And it was done by the party nomenklatura with the support of the Soviet people." I wrote this quite seriously, because I am sure that the people are simply sick of this government with its lies about everything and the cut from the food program. Plus unprecedented streams of lies, which no one was ready to filter out, they didn't lie so brazenly before. Plus a comparison of the standard of living here and there. Here you have real support from the people. "Changes, we want changes."
                  I am sure that if our leadership, starting in the 60s, had not been so brainless and weak-willed, and the country had developed at the same pace as in the West, nothing would have come of the perestroika and Belovezhskaya people.
                  1. +1
                    3 October 2024 23: 38
                    Alexey!
                    People, from time to time, really want change. In China they wanted change, but they were quickly calmed down with the use of the army and tanks. Harsh, cruel, but if China had gone wild with its 1,5 billion population, who would have benefited, even those who advocated change would have had a bad time, much worse than we did in the 90s. You are right, but as M Twain, I think, said, "If elections mattered, the people would not have been allowed to participate in them," something like that, not literally.
  11. -2
    2 October 2024 08: 20
    Autumn, ships are burning in the sky,
    Autumn, I would like to get away from the earth.
    Where sadness drowns in the sea,
    Autumn is a dark distance.
  12. +3
    2 October 2024 08: 40
    In this theatre of struggle for the life of Russian civilization we have failed.
    The Russian language became mandatory for teaching in all schools of the Union republics since 1929 and this is understandable, by that year the required number of specialists had been trained. In the blessed tsarist times, in the Caucasus and Transcaucasia, education was carried out by clergy of various faiths, and by the way, in Georgia and Armenia, ordinary people could study Russian only in the theological seminary, the Russian Orthodox Church and in the gymnasium, but cooks' children and children of low-ranking people were not accepted there. And in the villages and auls, Russian schools were not opened for the children of farmers and others.
  13. +3
    2 October 2024 09: 18
    All our troubles and miscalculations, whether under the tsars, or the communists, or the liberals, or even under United Russia, are due to technological and economic backwardness compared to our "partners". The reasons for the backwardness are the rigidity and venality of the political elite.
    1. 0
      2 October 2024 21: 13
      At the same time, "partners" with technological and economic superiority lose to the peoples of the "third world" in the growth of biological mass. Quantity affects quality.
      The reason for the degeneration of the elite is its closed nature. This is cured by self-organization of the people.
    2. +1
      3 October 2024 09: 55
      Banal and absurd subjectivism. They couldn't even eat it.
  14. +4
    2 October 2024 09: 22
    Quote: paul3390
    And who threatened us then in Siberia?


    And who came to us when breastfeeding started?
    Yankees, Japanese...
    1. +1
      2 October 2024 09: 59
      we shouldn't forget about the Chinese either...
  15. +1
    2 October 2024 09: 32
    Quote from solar
    And does this "etc." include Canada? A large, sparsely populated northern country, one of the most developed in the world? :((


    Canada is not very developed. And it is definitely not sovereign. It is simply an appendage of the USA. Including economically, American business in Canada is like at home.
    So Canadian achievements are more American. It is not for nothing that in Canada the local currency is also called the dollar.
    The main population is on the ocean coast (southwest and southeast of the country). The climate is not as severe as in Russia, it is not for nothing that the symbol of Canada is a maple leaf. Where in Russia do wild maples grow? We have more pine and larch. Canada is not such a "northern country". Well, even in Alaska the climate is milder than in Eastern Siberia.
    1. +4
      2 October 2024 10: 04
      Canada is not very developed.

      I like your sense of humor.
      Where do wild maples grow in Russia?


      Maples are widespread in the Northern Hemisphere, from the polar regions of Europe and North America to the tropical regions of Central America and South Asia....There are about twenty known species of maple in the Russian Federation, among which the most widespread are Norway maple (Acer platanoides), Tatar maple (Acer tataricum), field maple (Acer campestre) and white maple, or pseudo-sycamore maple (Acer pseudoplatanus). They mainly grow in the European part of Russia, and in Siberia the box elder, or American maple (Acer negundo), imported from North America, is very common...

      Where in Canada do palm trees grow, like in Sochi, for example?
      1. +6
        2 October 2024 11: 09
        Despite its large area, approximately 80% of Canada's population lives within 150 km of the U.S. border. In total, more than half of the country's population is concentrated in two provinces: Ontario (about a third) and Quebec (about a quarter).
        1. +5
          2 October 2024 11: 24
          So what? In Russia, the population also lives unevenly and gravitates towards the southern and European parts.
          1. +4
            2 October 2024 11: 42
            It is best to keep a map with latitudes marked in front of you. On such a map it is easy to see that the south of Russia is the north of the USA
            1. +3
              2 October 2024 12: 11
              On this map you can clearly see that the south of Russia is the north of the USA

              It was about Canada.
              1. 0
                2 October 2024 12: 25
                Well, yes. 80% of Canada's population lives near the US border.
              2. +1
                2 October 2024 12: 27
                Quote from solar
                the south of Russia is the north of the USA
                It was about Canada.

                Are you serious now?
                The North of the USA is the South of Canada)))
                1. +2
                  2 October 2024 13: 29
                  If we are talking about Canada, then why are you writing about the USA?
      2. +9
        2 October 2024 11: 59
        Quote from solar
        Where in Canada do palm trees grow, like in Sochi, for example?

        In Vancouver)
        In general, the most populated cities of Canada, such as Ottawa and Montreal, are located at the same latitude as Krasnodar Krai and Crimea.
        1. +2
          2 October 2024 12: 10
          Is this photo from Montreal or Ottawa?
          1. +3
            2 October 2024 12: 25
            Quote from solar
            This is your photo from

            Quote: Senior Sailor
            In Vancouver)

            request
            By the way, there are also cacti growing there, and they are local, not introduced like ours.
            1. +3
              2 October 2024 13: 33
              This means that the climate in Canada is similar to that in Russia, which is what was discussed initially.
              1. 0
                3 October 2024 09: 58
                Similarly, in Crimea we have two climatic zones, 27 thousand square kilometers of area.
      3. 0
        3 October 2024 09: 58
        Is it possible to create plantations near Sochi since palm trees grow?
      4. 0
        3 October 2024 14: 39
        in Vancouver for example
        https://nashvancouver.com/palmy-v-vankuvere/
  16. +8
    2 October 2024 09: 43
    Having huge hydrocarbon reserves in the north, whining about the cold winter? Just don't sell them, but use them to develop your own economy.
    Russia's problem is not its geographical location, but that it is infested with comprador capitalism.
    And if we don’t return to the socialist path, collapse is inevitable.
    1. +5
      2 October 2024 10: 04
      With huge hydrocarbon reserves in the north, whining about a cold winter?
      - Well, let's say you can whine smile
      come to us in Yakutsk in November for about five months bully
      1. +2
        2 October 2024 10: 17
        come to us in Yakutsk in November for about five months


        We've been there, we know. Five years of service in the Zabaikalsky Military District, living in a comfortable dormitory like this one.
        Not Yakutsk of course, but sunny Mogocha.
        1. +3
          2 October 2024 10: 26
          Well, we've been living here all our lives, and they regularly want to zero out our northern coefficient, or pay for travel on vacation once every two years. The center thinks that we live too richly, but they don't want to send their kids to work here bully hi
          1. 0
            3 October 2024 10: 07
            Of course they want to, look at the "freeloaders". Crimea is being built up with palaces and was built up under Ukraine, the mountain slopes are literally cracking, what is this, covered in honey? There are unplowed expanses over there.
            I am a little surprised by something else, they reset it. And the residents of the North just left, and who will work there, Tajiks or what? There is an unplowed land of wealth there, how do the bureaucrats even understand this place? Well, it will last them a lifetime, but for their grandchildren?
        2. +4
          2 October 2024 11: 32
          Quote: vovochkarzhevsky
          Not Yakutsk of course, but sunny Mogocha
          Those who lived in the Mogocha barracks are not afraid of Auschwitz - this is what one navigator from the Mi-24 liked to say, who was discharged due to health reasons and sent to continue his service at our school...
          1. +2
            2 October 2024 11: 38
            Those who lived in the Mogocha barracks are not afraid of Auschwitz - this is what one navigator from the Mi-24 liked to say, who was discharged for health reasons and sent to continue his service at our school...


            The most offensive thing is that by 1988 they had completely solved the problem of housing for military personnel. And then they abandoned everything.

    2. 0
      3 October 2024 10: 00
      It is very difficult to disagree with you.
  17. -1
    2 October 2024 10: 15
    Quote from solar
    I like your sense of humor.


    But on the merits? Try to refute that a fair share of the Canadian economy belongs to the Yankees.

    Quote from solar
    Where in Canada do palm trees grow, like in Sochi, for example?


    Well, maples grow here in Siberia... in cities, fortunately there are heating mains under the roots. In our Siberian taiga you won't find maples even with fire.
    And what do palm trees in Sochi have to do with the overall situation? In most of our territory, the climate is different than in Sochi, if you don't know that. And in general, our climate is harsher, that's a fact. We don't have the Atlantic or Pacific Ocean right next to us, fortunately, the majority of the population, unlike Canada, lives not on the coast, but deep in the continent.
    1. +6
      2 October 2024 11: 30
      But on the merits? Try to refute that a fair share of the Canadian economy belongs to the Yankees.

      It is generally accepted that you have to prove something if you make a claim. But in this case my comment was about your claim.
      Canada is not very developed.

      Well, maples grow here in Siberia... in cities, fortunately there are heating mains under the roots. In our Siberian taiga you won't find maples even with fire.

      You have substituted the concept of Russia with the concept of Siberia. In Russia, maple is the most common tree. As for Siberia, the conditions there are quite suitable for that very American maple.
      ...in Siberia, the American box elder (Acer negundo), a very aggressive invasive species imported from North America, is very common...

      We don't really have the Pacific Ocean nearby

      The Far East quietly cries on the sidelines...
      1. +1
        2 October 2024 13: 24
        Quote from solar
        It is generally accepted that you have to prove something if you make a claim. But in this case my comment was about your claim.


        I don't see the point in proving obvious things. By the way, why is the local currency in Canada also called the dollar and not the pound sterling?
        As for Canada's development, what are Canadians good at? The weakest economy of the G7 countries, no breakthrough technologies.

        Quote from solar
        You have replaced the concept of Russia with the concept of Siberia. In Russia, maple is the most common tree.


        Siberia is a large part of Russia in terms of territory. And Siberian resources, without which our economy cannot exist, have to be extracted in harsh conditions.
        The most common trees we have are birch, spruce and larch. And there are no good conditions for maple in the taiga, it will simply freeze to death here.


        Quote from solar
        The Far East quietly cries on the sidelines...


        That's exactly it, aside. In Canada, most of the population lives on the coast of oceans or large lakes that have an outlet to the Atlantic. What part of the Russian population lives in the Far East? And how good is the logistics connecting the Far East with the rest of the country?
        90% of Canada's territory is also practically undeveloped, people work there on a rotational basis. This is about the notorious development... there is still a lot of development to be done, just like here, by the way.

        Parshev's theorem is quite correct. However, "economic geography" was not invented by Parshev...
        1. +3
          2 October 2024 13: 40
          On this map you can clearly see that the south of Russia is the north of the USA

          You have such profound conclusions based on one word...
          The word "dollar" comes from "Joachimsthaler", a 5th-century coin minted near the silver mine at Joachimsthal, in Jáchymov, in what is now the Czech Republic. "Joachimsthal" means "Joachim's dale". "Joachimsthaler" was later shortened to "thaler", a word that eventually found its way into the Danish and Swedish dalers, the Dutch daalders, the Ethiopian talari, the Italian tallero, the Flemish dalder, and the English dollar.[1603] The word "thaler" or "dollar" has been used to refer to different coins at different times. The name dollar is mentioned in Shakespeare's play, written in 1606–XNUMX:
          Ross: "Svenon,
          The King of Norway asked for peace,
          But before committing the dead to the earth,
          He had to go to the island of St. Colm
          "We are to be given ten thousand dollars."
          In England (where the pronunciation of the currency's name changed to "dollar") "dollars" were used to refer to any silver coin similar to the thaler, while in colonial America, dollars were used to refer to the Spanish silver coin worth 8 reales that was widely circulated there, i.e. Spanish silver pesos (the so-called Spanish Dollars)[6].
  18. +5
    2 October 2024 10: 55
    The main reason Fort Ross was sold was its unprofitability. At first, the profit was from sea otters, but over time they tried to switch to agriculture, which also did not bring profit. Politically, no state recognized Fort Ross as Russia's, although there was a chance to be recognized by Mexico. Colonization of Russian America would have been possible with a strong military and merchant fleet and the presence of a huge number of settlers, but Russia was a feudal country and landowners would not have willingly let their peasants go.
    1. +1
      2 October 2024 15: 24
      It turns out that there was no chance to hold on to Alaska; if they had released too many serfs, then they could have easily gotten separatism over time; after all, it was too remote a territory.
      But, on the other hand, even now the population of Alaska is only 700 thousand people, despite the fact that it is the largest state in the USA by territory, that is, about 0.2% of the entire population of the USA, that is, besides everything else, even just populating Alaska is a big problem.
      1. 0
        3 October 2024 10: 18
        On the contrary, they are strangers there and would stick with Russia; the Siberians wouldn’t defect to the Chinese, would they?
        I have a question about letting go, who to let go? The one, you are a landowner, who brings you conditional money? Russian colonization and the emergence of quality in the mass of its - these are fugitives.
        1. 0
          3 October 2024 10: 46
          There were also Cossacks like Yermak, who significantly increased the territory of Russia. They were driven by a sense of freedom and a thirst for profit.
          Serfdom was a terrible brake on Russia's economic development. Political changes were needed first.
          1. 0
            5 October 2024 12: 58
            in fact, without serfdom, which allowed the noble class to be maintained - the military elite and command in the army. to provide recruits and militia to the army. to have resources for waging wars and developing industry - Russia itself in the form in which we received it in the 20th century would definitely not exist ... I agree: serfdom should have been abolished back under the emperors Alexander the First and Nicholas the First ... but in the century: 16-17-18 and the first decades of the 19th century it was impossible to do without it ... karma
            1. 0
              5 October 2024 18: 18
              And yet, Russia gained many lands, including Siberia, thanks to the Cossacks, who were a free people. The question of the benefits of serfdom for Rus', no matter what stage of its development, is controversial. As for me, Russia should have been proclaimed a republic at the Zemsky Sobor, but the people, of course, were not yet mature enough for this and believed in the good father tsar.
    2. 0
      3 October 2024 10: 14
      How did you attach serfdom to this? Nothing prevented Russia from developing the Northern Black Sea region, look at Gogol, he even wrote a book about dead souls. Finally, it was possible to attract foreigners, who would become Russians in a generation.
      1. 0
        3 October 2024 10: 53
        If serfs could move, it was only as villages or fugitives. A person had to decide for himself whether to move to new lands or not. A serf peasant did not have such freedom. The northern Black Sea region was populated mainly by foreigners: Bulgarians and Germans.
        1. 0
          3 October 2024 10: 57
          And by them too. But for example, we have a village in the Simferopol district, Nikolaevka, a popular place for Simferopol residents to relax at sea, founded by retired sailors, and Izyumovka - by the hussars of the Izyum regiment. If a peasant didn't have something, his landowner had freedom, Gogol didn't just write a work about the spirit of the dead.
          1. 0
            4 October 2024 10: 57
            Allow me to disagree. The landowner could be a simple vegetator who didn't care about distant places. The entire village is deprived of the opportunity to move to places with more favorable climatic conditions because of one lazy person. Some adventurer, having the right to choose, decides to leave the village, thereby setting an example for others, or even helping them to settle in a new place. People will start to follow him in a line.
  19. +5
    2 October 2024 13: 27
    Quote: Senior Sailor
    The North of the USA is the South of Canada)


    The North of the USA is... "Alaska, sir!" However, American Alaska, compared to our Chukotka or Yakutia, is simply a resort.
  20. +4
    2 October 2024 13: 34
    Quote: Gardamir
    It is best to keep a map with latitudes marked in front of you. On such a map it is easy to see that the south of Russia is the north of the USA


    Latitudes themselves don't tell you much. Irkutsk, for example, is on the same latitude as Amsterdam. But when the chestnuts are blooming in Amsterdam, we have snow.
    You need to look at the isotherms. The average temperature in Europe increases not only from north to south, but also from east to west. Thanks to warm sea currents.
    Russia is a continental country. Mongolia is to the south of Russia, but in winter in Mongolia the frosts go down to -40 degrees, and even -50.
  21. +1
    2 October 2024 13: 56
    Quote from solar
    You have such profound conclusions based on one word...


    So what currency is the Canadian dollar pegged to? The US dollar or the British pound sterling?
    Who is Canada's main trading partner: the United States or England?

    Structure of Canadian exports, TOP-10 Canadian goods by the end of 2023.
    TOP 10 products exported from Canada in 2023:

    17,5% ($99 billion): 2709 - Crude petroleum and crude petroleum products obtained from bituminous minerals
    6,68% ($37 billion): 8703 - Passenger cars and other motor vehicles designed primarily for the transport of persons (other than motor vehicles of heading 8702), including utility vans and racing cars
    3,62% ($ 20 billion): 7108 - Gold (including gold plated with platinum) unwrought or in semi-manufactured forms, or in powder form.
    2,55% ($14,4 billion): 2710 - Oil and oil products obtained from bituminous rocks, except crude; products not elsewhere specified or included, containing 70% by weight or more of petroleum or petroleum products derived from bituminous rocks, these petroleum products being the main constituents of the preparations; used oils
    2,41% ($13,6 billion): 2711 - Petroleum gases and other gaseous hydrocarbons
    2,36% ($13,4 billion): 8708 - Parts and accessories of motor vehicles of headings 8701 - 8705
    1,58% ($ 8,99 billion): 2701 - Hard coal; briquettes, pellets and similar solid fuels obtained from coal
    1,56% ($ 8,83 billion): 1001 - Wheat and meslin.
    1,51% ($8,57 billion): 3104 - Mineral or chemical fertilizers, potash

    https://trendeconomy.ru/data/h2/Canada

    Not very impressive, though. Perhaps the export from a truly highly developed country should be somewhat different.
    1. +2
      2 October 2024 19: 48
      I leave you to grieve over Canada's backwardness alone. Maybe you'll accumulate some more junk.
      hi
      1. -1
        3 October 2024 13: 56
        As they say: "DRAIN-PROTECTED!"
  22. +3
    2 October 2024 15: 12
    Vast distances, the Arctic zone and long winter. No access to warm seas with access to world communications. All this slows down the development of the national economy, forcing us to spend a lot of money and effort just to survive. That is, due to our geographical location, our people are doomed to a closed and poor, unsatisfactory existence.



    Dear author, is it true then that AvtoVAZ is inferior to Toyota in competition only because of climatic conditions?

    The fact that Russia has a huge territory with long winters does not exclude the fact that we have enough territory with a more or less acceptable climate, in fact, at least the entire territory of the European part of Russia. Yes, Russia will not be able to compete in banana production, and for high-tech products, the climate (within reasonable limits) does not play a big role.
    1. 0
      2 October 2024 16: 09
      If the US market had been open to AvtoVAZ since the 1960s, like Toyota, then they could have been compared.
      There would already be a branch in Komsomolsk-on-Amur.

      P.S. How many car brands have disappeared in the US? And AvtoVAZ still exists.)
      1. +5
        2 October 2024 17: 57
        So AvtoVAZ opened the market of Africa, the countries of the CE and the USSR, which is not a small market. They just decided not to bother with changing models and innovations, if they were already taking it because of the lack of competitors, competitors came and VAZ instantly became an ancient basin.
  23. 0
    2 October 2024 17: 54
    For example, the climate does not affect the IT sector, software development, or cinema (Hollywood, Bollywood, K-pop and other mass culture as an element of promoting the country in the world). There is no desire, the Japanese are the same with their auto industry and innovations in household appliances, for example - there was rare crap at the beginning, but they did not listen to all sorts of oh fsyo we can't handle it, but worked. We have a strong nuclear industry and competencies in processing and recycling waste from nuclear power plants, and there are many nuclear power plants around the world, but we are the only ones processing, this is a good start, machine tool building and in general the introduction of innovations and inventions, at least at the stage of testing prototypes a la Derpa, to do something in other industries, and we will have something like Sony and other things that are on everyone's lips all over the world.
  24. BAI
    0
    2 October 2024 20: 40
    Russia is not competitive on the world market due to the peculiarities of Russian geography (vast territories) and climate (low average annual temperature).

    Why aren't African countries prospering?
    Finland, Sweden, Norway, Canada, Iceland - all northern countries. And they live well. Yes, they are smaller in size, although Canada is quite large.
    That is, the climate has nothing to do with it. It makes sense to consider the population density. Which is already noticeable - in those regions of Russia where the population density is high - Moscow, St. Petersburg - there is prosperity, where the density is low - depression
  25. -1
    2 October 2024 20: 44
    Russia is uncompetitive on the world market due to the reactionary nature of the current regime, which is dragging it back into the past.
  26. 0
    2 October 2024 20: 52
    Morning Samsonella.
    On behalf of Samsonov, but I am sure it was not written by him.
  27. -1
    2 October 2024 23: 42
    The well-being of a country depends not primarily on climatic conditions, but on the people.
  28. 0
    3 October 2024 09: 13
    Quote: Wened75
    If AvtoVAZ had been open to the US market since the 1960s, like Toyota, then they could have been compared.


    Only products of the same price category can be compared correctly. However, Toyotas are more expensive, and what could you buy on the world market for the price of a Lada?
  29. -1
    3 October 2024 09: 17
    Quote: Oldrover
    Yes, Russia will not be able to compete in banana production, and for high-tech products, the climate (within reasonable limits) does not play a big role.


    It does play a role, though. Not just climate, though. Logistics, for example, proximity to sources of raw materials and to end consumers.
    By the way, does the availability of technology matter? Our country has long been living in limited access to key technologies. But the Japanese, at one time, opened the tap, based primarily on geopolitical considerations.
    Just like China... however, the Chinese have also started to have their oxygen cut off.
  30. -1
    3 October 2024 09: 25
    Quote: BAI
    Finland, Sweden, Norway, Canada, Iceland - all northern countries. And they live quite well.


    They were allowed to live well, it would be better that way. Because all these dwarfs are not competitors to the "big boys", they walk on tiptoes, and sometimes they are simply not interesting.
    When did Sweden seriously fight there? And Norway? The latter could only do "hende hoch" in WWII. The Finns - yes, but they switched sides very successfully and ended up in the black. And for Sweden, WWII turned out to be a feeding trough, with both sides profiting.
    This is the story with geography...

    A bear cannot be like a hamster and hide in a hole without attracting attention.
    And yes, the climate in these countries (except, perhaps, Iceland) is still milder: thanks to the Gulf Stream.
    The population is concentrated in the southern regions; the northern regions of Scandinavia are practically uninhabited.
  31. -1
    3 October 2024 09: 28
    Quote: Esaul
    The well-being of a country depends not primarily on climatic conditions, but on the people.


    The well-being of a country also depends on the history of that country. If you live on the outskirts, you don't have to experience upheavals and wars - you can live a prosperous life as a "wise gudgeon".
    But our country is definitely not a "minnow", not of that scale.
  32. -1
    3 October 2024 13: 55
    Quote: evgen1221
    competitors arrived and the VAZ instantly became an ancient basin.


    Even in the 90s, VAZ controlled a segment of the domestic market that no American company controls at home anymore.
    VAZ has very few competitors, since very few cars are sold at the price of a Lada.
  33. -1
    6 October 2024 20: 01
    Regarding the climate, I disagree. Ice-free ports are important, we have them. Arkhangelsk, Murmansk, St. Petersburg, Novorossiysk, Nakhodka, etc. Canada is also a large and northern country, so it trades. And we trade. The problem is that the Anglo-Saxons are holding us back as best they can, making trouble, and that's where the difficulties come from. But that's okay, we're coping for now.