ATGM "Fagot" in Special Operations: old system and new ideas

25
ATGM "Fagot" in Special Operations: old system and new ideas
Crew of the Fagot ATGM in the Kupyansk direction, December 2023.


The Russian army is armed with an anti-tank missile 9K111 Fagot complex. It was developed more than half a century ago, but is still in service. Proper use of this ATGM allows you to fully reveal its potential and compensate for its shortcomings. Fagot remains quite modern weapons, which is clearly confirmed during the Special Operation.



Combat application


The Fagot ATGM is in service with the Russian ground and airborne forces. Despite their age and the presence of more modern systems, these systems continue to be one of the main weapons of their class. The 9K111 products increase the firepower of units and help them fight enemy armored vehicles.

Since February 2022, Fagots have been actively used during the Special Operation to Protect Donbass. Crews of these ATGMs are present in almost all major army and airborne units and actively use their weapons against various targets.

The Ministry of Defense and unofficial channels regularly publish objective control videos with real episodes of combat use of "Fagots". In addition, full-fledged reports and interviews with crews appear. All these materials allow us to understand how exactly 9K111 are used in combat and what results they demonstrate.


An ATGM operator from an airborne unit prepares for launch, July 2024.

According to published materials, the Fagots are capable of hitting a wide range of targets. The guided missiles are used tanks and other armored vehicles. They also destroy other enemy vehicles and manpower, both in open spaces and in shelters. Fagots have been used repeatedly to destroy boats with landing forces.

Like other domestic ATGMs, Fagots are used in various situations. They are used to repel enemy attacks, knocking out their armored vehicles. In offensive actions, the missiles are used to destroy strongholds and fortifications to weaken the enemy's defense.

By now, the Fagot ATGM crews should have jointly destroyed a large number of different targets. Given the scale of their use, we can talk about thousands of destroyed armored vehicles, cars, strongholds and other objects. The special operation continues, and the Fagot combat score will only grow.

Useful experience


Combat use of the 9K111 ATGM in a major conflict against a numerous and technically advanced enemy demonstrated its real potential. These systems confirmed their characteristics and capabilities, and also allowed us to test their tactics in practice. Moreover, as they continue to be used, new ideas and solutions emerge that increase the effectiveness of combat operations and reduce risks.


The rocket has launched. The wires of the rocket control system are visible.

The special operation once again showed that the infantry ATGM crew must be mobile. Already in the first weeks and months, the fighters faced the problem of counterattacks. At first, the enemy tried to attack the missilemen's positions with mortars, and then attack UAVs were used.

The mobility problem is solved by using available vehicles. ATGM crews travel in various types of vehicles, which allows them to quickly arrive at the launch site and leave it before a retaliatory strike.

Recently, another method of reducing risks has become known. Several units have received "Fagots" equipped with an additional remote control system. Such devices allow the operator to be at a significant distance from the launcher and not be exposed to risks.

As the fighting continues, the range of targets that the 9K111 and other ATGM systems are working on changes. In the first months of the Special Operation, tanks had to be attacked regularly. However, over time, the share of such targets became smaller, and other armored objects began to be used more often. Apparently, there are fewer such targets now.

Due to its age, the Fagot ATGM has certain limitations when working against armored vehicles with a high level of protection. At the same time, light armored vehicles, such as armored personnel carriers or infantry fighting vehicles, remain a fairly simple target. Their armor is insufficient to protect against an anti-tank missile designed for more complex targets.


Preparing ATGMs in position

It can be assumed that the continued combat use of the Fagots and the expected change in the situation on the battlefield will lead to the accumulation of additional experience and the emergence of new ideas. The result of this will again be an increase in combat effectiveness and a reduction in risks for personnel.

Technical potential


The future ATGM 9K111 "Fagot" was developed in the late 60s at the Instrument-making Design Bureau (Tula) and the Central Research Institute of Precision Engineering (Klimovsk). All tests and modifications were completed by the end of the decade, and in 1970 the new system was accepted into service by the Soviet Army.

Subsequently, the Fagot ATGM was repeatedly modernized in order to improve its main tactical and technical characteristics. New versions of the 9M111 missile were created, and then the 9M113 Konkurs product was manufactured on its basis, which has higher performance indicators.

The main modifications of the Fagot ATGM are still in service with our army and are actively used in various situations. If earlier they were used only in exercises, then since 2022 they have become one of the main means for destroying Ukrainian armored vehicles.


Fighters of the Zapad group are ready to fire, August 2024.

The 9K111 product has a traditional architecture for domestic ATGMs. It consists of a portable 9P135 launcher on a tripod with a control unit and a transport and launch container with a 9M111 or 9M113 missile. The kit also includes various maintenance tools and other items.

The overall dimensions of the complex are determined by the dimensions of the TPK with the missile, which is about 1,1 m long. The launcher weighs 22,5 kg, and the missile in the container weighs 13,5 kg. It is carried in two packs: one holds the launcher, and the second contains two missiles.

The control unit on the launcher is equipped with optical means for target search and missile guidance. After launch, the operator must hold the aiming mark on the selected target, while the automation tracks the position of the missile and guides it along the line of sight, generating and sending the necessary commands.

The 9M111 series missiles are no more than 910 mm long and have a body diameter of 120 mm. The weight is about 11-13 kg. The tail section of the missile has planes that can be unfolded in flight. The 9M113 products have a similar design, but the caliber has been increased to 135 mm, which has increased the internal volume and improved other characteristics.


Deployment of ATGMs in the dark

The 9M111 missile is propelled by a solid-fuel engine. The maximum flight speed reaches 240 m/s. Early modifications had a flight range of 2 km, but as the design developed, this parameter increased. In the case of the 9M113M Konkurs-M missile, the range was increased to 4 km.

The missile control system is quite simple. There is a lamp in the tail of the missile, by which the launcher's automation tracks the missile's position. There is also a coil of wire on board for receiving commands sent to the steering machines.

All versions of the 9M111 and 9M113 missiles are equipped only with cumulative warheads. Initially, the penetration was 200 mm at an angle of 60°, but in new modifications this figure increased. "Konkurs-M" can penetrate at least 800 mm of homogeneous armor.

According to available data, the development of the missile part of the Fagot ATGM has long since stopped. However, measures to improve the launcher are proposed. The existing product has been supplemented with a video camera, remote control drives and communication equipment. Thanks to this, the operator can control the complex remotely and with minimal risks.

The widespread use of unmanned aerial vehicles has also affected the Fagot ATGM. Now Drones different types are used for reconnaissance in the interests of anti-tank systems. They are used to search for targets for subsequent shooting and to control the results of the launch.


Fagot ATGMs destroy enemy boats and landing forces on the Kinburn Spit, August 2024.

Measures are being taken to protect against enemy UAVs. In the summer, the Ministry of Defense reported that a third fighter is being included in the Fagot combat crew. His task is to monitor the air situation and combat enemy UAVs. He must prevent the detection of a position and subsequent attack.

Old but not outdated


The 9K111 Fagot ATGM was created more than half a century ago, but it still remains in service and occupies its niche in the arsenal of ground units. Complexes of this type successfully solve various fire missions, and the army does not plan to abandon them.

Experience with the Fagot clearly shows that the age and characteristics of the model are not always decisive. Proper organization of combat use and use of advantages allows to level out the shortcomings of any weapon and obtain the best result.
25 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +8
    27 September 2024 06: 17
    [quote][In the case of the 9M113M Konkurs-M missile, the range was increased to 4 km.
    /quote]This is the range when firing from the 9P148 self-propelled gun. If you fire a 9M113M missile from the Fagot, the range does not exceed 2,5 km. This is due to the fact that the 9M113's own batteries are sufficient for exactly 2,5 km, and when firing from the 9P148, there is additional power supply for the vehicle.
  2. +1
    27 September 2024 07: 26
    Control wires both minus and plus, as protection against interference.
    1. 0
      27 September 2024 07: 38
      And wires now have no minus (short range), only pluses: low price, simplicity, noise immunity, ease of targeting).
    2. 0
      27 September 2024 08: 52
      What are the downsides???
      Well, and for the site administration.
      1. +1
        27 September 2024 10: 21
        Well, the wires have their range, you can't wind a lot and the speed, if the missile speed is too high, the wire can break, that's why they are subsonic, and at a long range it is critical, the target can escape. I studied these systems at the institute, at our department this 9P148 was in section and they fired at the firing ranges. The 9M113 missile is powerful, but again the range is limited by the wires. And an accidental explosion can cut the wire
        1. 0
          27 September 2024 10: 33
          I studied this issue as an optional subject. From articles in reputable specialized publications.
          It turns out that the probability of guidance failure due to external factors is the same for a wire and a laser. The difference is minimal.
          And the range of 3 km is quite sufficient for most situations.
          With this control method, there is nothing on the missile except the servos. The cheapest option and at the same time it works. An excellent mass-produced ATGM.
          The external remote control has already been attached. All that's left is the ODB and it will be a universal instrument.
          Well, speed is a thing. But at short distances it is not so critical.
        2. +1
          27 September 2024 10: 52
          I wonder, what are the results of hitting light armored vehicles at the proving ground? Is there only a hole from the cumulative jet or is there extensive damage to the hull?
          1. +2
            27 September 2024 11: 30
            A small hole, a finger will fit through and around like inclusions or fusions in a radius of about 20 cm, depends on the angle of entry, but otherwise everything looks intact. If there is no armor at all, then there are breaks.
            1. 0
              27 September 2024 15: 46
              Thanks for the answer and information. So, a hit from an RPG is not synonymous with destruction, which is confirmed by numerous facts. What is important is not the hit itself, but the place where it landed.
    3. +6
      27 September 2024 11: 25
      Quote: Vadim S
      Control wires both minus and plus, as protection against interference.

      The wired control system is also subject to interference. But it is not the control signal going to the ATGM that is jammed/substituted, but the signal from the light source in the tail section of the missile, which is used to determine the position of the ATGM relative to the target.
      The IR spotlights on the tank's turret, when powered by the Shtora, do just that - they act like the tail of an ATGM, driving the ATGM's control system crazy. smile
  3. 0
    27 September 2024 07: 37
    Weapons that can kill are not obsolete.
    1. 0
      27 September 2024 08: 47
      Then why aren't you at the front with a halberd yet?
    2. 0
      27 September 2024 08: 57
      It can be outdated, of course. The flywheel guidance drives on the portable launcher are primitive and extremely inconvenient. The possibility of missing such an expensive missile due to the inconvenience of control is something else. If they made a remote control, that's already good.
  4. +4
    27 September 2024 09: 51
    Mdaaaa...! Ryabov is Ryabov! For him, confusing a "fork with a bottle" is like "two fingers on the pavement"!
    The 9M111 missile is propelled by a solid-fuel engine. The maximum flight speed reaches 240 m/s. Early modifications had a flight range of 2 km, but as the design developed, this parameter increased. In the case of the 9M113M Konkurs-M missile, the range was increased to 4 km. The 9M111M "Fagot-M/Faktoriya" modification has a range of 2,5 km...9M113 "Konkurs" has a range of up to 4 km and a single-block warhead...9M113M "Konkurs-M" differs from the 9M113 mainly in its tandem warhead! There was an experimental "Konkurs-3" with either laser or radio beam guidance...But further work led to the emergence of the "Khrizantema" ATGM, if my memory serves me right! In Belarus, they are modernizing the 9M111 and 9M113 by "attaching" additional cumulative charges - "leaders"...
  5. +1
    27 September 2024 10: 43
    Once I had a chance to talk to a senior lieutenant-ATGM operator... He told me that "Fagot" has not been considered the main anti-tank ATGM for a long time due to insufficient armor-piercing and a single-block warhead! That at present "Fagot" is considered as an assault, anti-bunker weapon, as a weapon of sabotage and reconnaissance groups and all this according to the principle: "so that the goods do not go to waste"! And look how it turned out in the SVO!
  6. Owl
    +1
    27 September 2024 13: 47
    The Fagot complex has one significant advantage: control of the missile via wires eliminates the impact of electronic warfare systems on the missile's flight. If they notice, hide behind smoke or manage to take cover, the enemy is lucky, he has evaded the attack, but noticing the launch and flight of a missile from a distance of 1,5-2,5 kilometers is very problematic.
  7. +2
    27 September 2024 18: 59
    [i]the article could have been shortened 5 times without compromising the quality. when I read it, I had the feeling that I was reading the same paragraph. I looked at who the author was and understood why.i]
  8. 0
    28 September 2024 09: 47
    How could one possibly write such a worthless article?
  9. 0
    29 September 2024 14: 04
    An article from the series "Captain Obvious Broadcasts". The product fights and destroys the enemy. The rest is for broadening the horizons. A normal complex. And the work of the vertical and horizontal guidance flywheels does not cause any inconvenience. You keep the target in the small ring of the aiming mark and the missile goes to the target. The launcher is used for both the "Fagot" and the "Konkurs". The tripod for launching was located in the troop compartment of the BMP-2 and BMP-1P. It can also be used from the bracket of the turret of these vehicles.
    1. 0
      30 September 2024 10: 28
      Working with flywheels doesn't cause any inconvenience? Really? I understand when manufacturers of such things try to hide the shortcomings of their product. But if the one who uses it tries to hide the shortcomings, then this is beyond the bounds of reason.
      1. 0
        30 September 2024 10: 41
        Two questions for you: 1. How many combat launches of ATGMs have you personally conducted? 2. How many operators of these systems have you personally trained?
        1. 0
          30 September 2024 10: 47
          I myself couldn't handle it on the stand and I haven't seen anyone who could. It's an extremely inconvenient control system, it simply couldn't be made worse. It requires long training and success is not guaranteed. This is with a very expensive missile. Control from inside an infantry fighting vehicle is a completely different matter.
          1. 0
            30 September 2024 10: 53
            From inside the BMP??? Are you confusing anything? For example with "Malyutka". This is something new, sorry. After three to five electronic launches, any cadet in training had no misses.
            1. 0
              30 September 2024 10: 55
              What are you talking about, my dear? Isn't there a remote control for the ATGM inside the BMP? What other Malyutka?
              And they smeared everything on the stand. Controlling flywheels on a moving target is more difficult than driving a car.
              1. 0
                30 September 2024 11: 01
                I didn't drink to brotherhood with you, you ignoramus. And I didn't go on reconnaissance missions with you. There will be no discussion.