The Legend of the Russian Joan of Arc

29
The Legend of the Russian Joan of Arc
Something too expensive and rich for a peasant widow...

The image of a female rebel is so vivid that it could not help but appear in fiction: there are half a dozen novels written about Alena. For example, here is a description of Razin's meeting with Alena in S. Zlobin's novel "Stepan Razin": "Look at you! Razin grinned. "I thought you were a fathom tall, but you wear pants and a blouse, and you're over fifty, and you wear a sabre on your belt... it's not for nothing that they call you "old woman." And why does the author care that Razin could not physically meet Alena - he was fighting at the time she was in Temnikov, in the area of ​​Astrakhan and Tsaritsyn?


K. V. Smirnov “Alena’s Fight” 1979 Temnikov Museum named after F. F. Ushakov

It must be said that Alena Arzamasskaya really existed, really took part in the uprising and really was burned. Otherwise, reality is so intertwined with fiction that untangling this knot is not an easy task.



The fact is that Russian documents about this extraordinary woman are extremely scarce, although they provide important information - where she lived, where she was from, who she was married to, and so on. And all the most colorful details are taken from the works of foreign authors, primarily Johann Frisch, the author of "Instructive Conversations" (1677), the dissertation of Johann Justus Marcius "Stenko Razin, the Don Cossack Traitor" (1674) and "Messages Concerning the Details of the Rebellion Perpetrated in Muscovy by S. Razin" of 1671.


In Russia, onions are not a peasant thing. weapon...

For example, Frisch tells a story about Alyona’s “last battle”: “When part of his (Razin’s – Author’s note) troops were defeated by Dolgorukov, she, being their leader, took refuge in the church and continued to resist there so stubbornly that she first shot all her arrows, killing seven or eight more, and after she saw that further resistance was impossible, she untied her sabre, threw it away and threw herself backwards towards the altar with outstretched arms. In this pose she was found and captured. She must have possessed unprecedented strength, since in Dolgorukov’s army there was no one who could fully draw her bow.” Simply not a woman, but a Terminator (not to mention the fact that a bow in Russia is a noble weapon)!


The old woman-voivode leads the battle

And in the "Message" it is stated that: "Among other prisoners, a nun in a man's dress over a monastic robe was brought to Prince Yuri Dolgoruky. That nun had a detachment of seven thousand people under her command and fought bravely until she was taken prisoner." Seven thousand? That's a real wartime division; in the 17th century, a woman could command one only in fairy tales.

Marcius' dissertation, as befits a scientific work, is extremely brief: "But no one was punished more severely than the Mordvin Cossacks, if you do not count a certain woman who was burned because she exchanged the monastic rank to which she previously belonged for military clothes and affairs."


There is no information about Alena Arzamasskaya's age or appearance, so each artist has the right to their own vision of the character.

History heroic and very literary, at least for real life. Russian documents tell us about it.

On September 27, 1670, rebel detachments, raised ("seduced" in the terminology of the time) to fight by "thieves' letters", take the city of Temnikov. Around this time, the governor Yuri Dolgorukov (in the "Message" he is mistakenly called Dolgoruky) arrives in Arzamas to fight the "thieves". The prince begins sending detachments around the surrounding area, which take one settlement after another.

On October 6, the rebels attack one of these units near the village of Kerenki, but are defeated. After interrogating the prisoners, the first information about a nun in the ranks of the rebels appears: Ataman Andrei Osipov and abyz (priest) Murza Smail Sokolov say that they heard about an old woman who gathers people in the Shatsk district for "theft".

At one time, normal theft was called "tatba", that is, here we are talking specifically about treason. Osipov called the old woman a sorceress from the village of Krasnaya Sloboda and said that she was going to move from Shatsk to Kasimov. Sokolov and Osipov named different numbers of the detachment - from 200 to 600 people. And, yes, neither of them named the sorceress.

After the defeat at Kerenki, Ataman Fyodor Sidorov gathers the closest detachments of Razin's men in Temnikov; most likely, the old woman arrived in the city with one of them.

It is worth clarifying right away that “eldress” is not an age! It is a monastic rank, one could be an elder at 20 or at 60.

But the rebels are unlucky again: on November 30, they are beaten again. And then what happens regularly in such cases happens: the residents of Temnikov decide that they are not on the same path with the revolution and hand over the rebels to the governor Dolgorukov: 18 peasants, a priest, and the old woman Alena. They immediately explain that this is not an old woman at all, but a thief and a heretic ("conspiracy letters", roots, and other props are included).


There is a certain approximation to reality...

During the interrogation, the old woman said that: “They call her Alena, and her birthplace, sir, is the city of Arzamas, the daughter of a peasant from the Vyezdnye Sloboda, and she was married to a peasant from the same Sloboda; and when her husband died, she took the veil... And in the present year, sir, 197 (i.e. 1670), she came from Arzamas to Temnikov and took many people with her to steal, and she stole with them, and they stayed in Temnikov with the ataman Fedka Sidorov and taught him witchcraft.”

In general, the governor Dolgorukov did not drag his feet (the invention of the rubber vulcanization process was still two hundred years away): on the first day – interrogation with partiality and the sentence – to burn in a log house, along with letters and roots. The sentence was carried out the next day. Everything was in accordance with Article 1 of Chapter 1 “On Blasphemers and Church Rebels” of the Cathedral Code of 1649.

Was Alena an ataman and did she fight against government troops?

Well... In Russian court documents, the smallest protocol details were scrupulously observed. If someone was an ataman, then this person was never called anything other than an ataman in all documents, for example, Vaska Kosoy! The same Fyodor Sidorov appears in all documents as "ataman Fedka Sidorov" and nothing else. This title is not used in relation to Alyona - only "staritsa". And the Cossacks did not appoint women as atamans (not to mention that all the documents state: Alyona gathered people, but nowhere is it written that she commanded them).

The second principle of official documents from the time of Tsar Alexei Mikhailovich (and even earlier, much earlier!) is the scrupulous observance of hierarchy. The most important prisoners were always listed first in the "voivode's report", and then all the others in descending order. Dolgorukov's order is as follows: "the village priest Savva, 18 peasants from various villages and hamlets, a thief and a heretic old woman."

In general, of all his prey, the prince puts Alena in last place.


Nina Kosheleva as the old woman. Ballet “Alena Arzamasskaya”, State Opera and Ballet Theater named after I. M. Yakushev, Saransk

Why did the old woman Alena occupy such a high place in foreign sources?

It's all about European intellectual fashion. In the mid-17th century, at the instigation of Cardinal Richelieu, the "media promotion" of Joan of Arc began in France. No, she was known before and canonized long ago, but the cunning cardinal, on the wave of yet another conflict with England, makes her not just a pious conductor of God's will, but a real Amazon.

And foreigners drew elementary parallels: she took part in the war, was burned at the stake – here she is, the Russian Joan of Arc!

And the fact that the image of Zhanna doesn’t fit the real Alena, from the words “at all” and “completely”... Who cares about this?

It's a very beautiful literary story. They even staged a ballet called "Alena Arzamasskaya"...
29 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. 0
    26 September 2024 07: 11
    Was Alena an ataman and did she fight against government troops?

    There is an opinion that yes, because she organized a detachment and took Temniki. Alyona ruled the city and the army for more than two months. The detachment numbered more than 2000 rebels.

    The scale is certainly not that of Joan of Arc, but the punishment is the same.

    It's not a woman's job to fight...
    1. -5
      26 September 2024 08: 00
      Quote: Olgovich
      It's not a woman's job to fight...
      She should be standing at the stove wink
    2. +4
      26 September 2024 09: 43
      The problem here is that we have a problem with documents: some of them were destroyed in the Moscow fire, some of them were cut up into cardboard by the clerks (a real case: someone was working with an 18th century book and later found out that its cover was glued together from 16th century charters). In general, I have indicated everything that is available. Another thing is that the image is so vivid that it has become overgrown with legendary details...
  2. +6
    26 September 2024 07: 51
    And the fact that the image of Zhanna does not fit the real Alena, from the words “at all” and “completely”...

    Of course it doesn't fit, the French one was for the king, and ours was against the king...
    But she was still an outstanding woman for her time, even when she was still a nun, about whom legends circulated about her healing. She discovered, one might say, antibiotics before Flemming, collecting mold from the corners of baths, which she dried and treated purulent wounds.
    When I enter Arzamas from Murom through the village of Vyezdnoye, the birthplace of Alena, I always remember her. She has an interesting fate - the places of birth, life in the monastery and death are literally nearby, within a kilometer. At the entrance to Arzamas, on the right, on the high bank of the floodplain of the Tesha River, there is a place called Ivanovskie Bugry, it was there that Ivan the Terrible stopped on his campaign against Kazan, and there he named the fortress he founded Arzamas in honor of Arza and Mas, the Mordvin leaders who helped him in the war against the Kazan Khanate. On Ivanovskie Bugry, she was executed like thousands of Razin's followers. No one even builds there, there are a lot of bones in the ground.
    1. +2
      26 September 2024 09: 44
      I've never been to those parts, which is a pity. I was born in Tver, and then spent my whole life in garrisons - Crimea, the Far East, so I don't even know my native Volga region very well)))
    2. +4
      26 September 2024 09: 52
      The fact that she was outstanding is a fact: in the middle of the 17th century, a peasant widow had to be able to get into Russian and foreign documents! As for the rest, it is very difficult to separate the truth from later legends. The fact that she could heal is a conclusion from the term "witch doctor", usually those who understood the roots were called just that (especially since she was caught with these very roots). By the way, judging by the "thieves' letters", she was also literate, and for a peasant woman this is generally cool, cooler than shooting a bow! But there are no specifics. Dolgorukov was not a witch doctor and did not understand the roots, so how exactly she used them is unknown. Maybe she made amulets, read spells over them, or maybe she added them to vodka for the sake of taste - there is a wide scope for imagination)))
    3. 0
      26 September 2024 10: 16
      Quote: Konnick
      , the French were for the king, and ours were against the king.

      No, Razin did NOT intend to overthrow Tsar Alexei Mikhailovich, but he declared himself an enemy of the entire official administration - governors, clerks, representatives of the church, accusing them of "treason" against the TsarThe Razinites spread a rumor that Tsarevich Alexei Alexeevich was in their ranks.
  3. +2
    26 September 2024 07: 53
    Interesting article, interesting story. Let's see how many stones will remain from this story if respected experts come forward with comments.
  4. -12
    26 September 2024 08: 10
    A woman should cook cabbage soup, not fight, they did the right thing by burning such people, it’s like a plague, it needs to be destroyed.
    1. 0
      26 September 2024 08: 33
      Another follower of "Kirch, Kinder, Küche"!
      Maybe a woman herself will decide what and to whom she owes?
      1. -1
        26 September 2024 14: 38
        Quote: Alexander Kuksin
        Another follower of "Kirch, Kinder, Küche"!
        Learn to pronounce these three words first. wink
  5. 0
    26 September 2024 09: 20
    not to mention that in Russia the bow is a noble weapon)!
    Of course, because it was used by the noble cavalry, and the peasants went hunting with sticks...
    1. 0
      26 September 2024 09: 47
      No, it is doubtful that with sticks (even during the time of Ivan the Terrible, when recruiting archers, they issued a call to those who were "quick and able to shoot from bows and arquebuses"), but a combat bow is very different from a hunting bow. And the description of "a bow that no one can draw" clearly does not apply to a hunting weapon...
      1. -1
        26 September 2024 10: 20
        The peasants were stupid, they didn’t know how to make soldiers, that’s a matter of noble minds laughing
        1. +3
          26 September 2024 11: 01
          Well, actually there were master archers who made combat bows, but they were for the poor: rich nobles used imported ones, Boris Godunov had "5 Turkish bows, 3 Circassian (North Caucasian), 4 Bukharan, 2 Edirne (apparently made in Edirne), 3 Crimean and 4 Moscow work". Domestic ones were in the clear minority. The goods were not cheap, Pensky in "Military Affairs of the Moscow State" indicates the cost of a rich sadak (a set of a bow, quiver and bow case) by Mikhail Tatishchev at 14 rubles, specifying that the cheapest cost 1 ruble. 200 arrowheads cost 26,5 kopecks. A ruble is a regular annual rent for a plot of land. So, yes, they didn’t know how to do it, and yes, it was a matter of noble minds...
      2. 0
        26 September 2024 14: 36
        Quote: Flying_Dutchman
        A combat bow is very different from a hunting bow.

        I wonder - how? In theory - the combat one should be more compact, so as not to get caught in the line, and have a longer range. Again, the arrow should be heavier.
        1. +2
          26 September 2024 17: 49
          A wooden board, aged in special conditions for at least five years, is needed to make a bow blank. That is why there are no European bows in the list - all European cities were plundered and burned much more often than once every five years, so the blanks did not survive)
          You need more than one board, a good bow is always composite, certainly glued. The best bone bow glue is from the sky of the Volga sturgeon, so the list includes mountain - there was access to sturgeons in the Volga floodplain, plus the blanks were hidden in the mountains, and they remained intact during the usual bloody showdowns of mountain bandits. In the mountains, it is easy to provide the necessary humidity, in the forest, for example, it will not work.
          Crimean and Edirne - in Turkey, the craft of a master archer was taught to future sultans, so it was very, very honorable, and until then, barns were rarely burned there. All "foreign" bows were always terribly richly decorated and painted, apparently Tatishchev attached great importance to show-off. But he most likely went into battle with a Russian)
          Archery is difficult, but it was accessible to any village craftsman. It's just that it's all long and tedious. So a hunting bow was made of fewer layers, and as a rule, the blank was not kept for five years - there was no point. The main secret of the durability of the bow is the cover varnish. And it was rare and terribly expensive. This varnish had to be both durable and flexible to withstand the work of the bow. The best varnish is Chinese. Not within the peasant's means. So the peasant bow lasted 3-4 years and was given up...
          1. +1
            26 September 2024 19: 01
            I had a very strange bow when I was a child - I found a strangely curved oak branch in the forest, as thick as an arm. It was all rotten - playing around like a boy, I knocked this dust on the tree trunks, and only the core remained in my hands. All attempts to break it did not lead to anything, and I decided to make a bow out of it - I was so amazed by its elasticity. This bow lived with me for a very long time - I do not remember it broken. Most likely, it just got lost somewhere, after I lost interest in shooting from it. I remember - there was a problem with quality arrows.
            1. +1
              27 September 2024 08: 48
              A bow made of one stick (not oak, but yew), that's for the English) Their famous archers fought with such stakes. As a combat bow, it was inferior to the Russian one by about two or three times. An oak stick cannot be used as a hunting or combat bow - it will break. Now find an ash one (yew doesn't seem to grow here).
              When used, wood inevitably breaks fibers. If there is a varnish coating, this happens deep in the body of the tree, and not very massively. Glued layers reduce this destruction several times, distributing and damping the force (the processes there are very complex).
              Moisture coming from the surface of unvarnished onions greatly increases the number of broken fibers, especially in layers close to the surface. The reliability will fall to the ground...
              There were also bows made entirely of horn (and not just horn inserts in a glued package), frame bows, a lot of everything.
            2. 0
              27 September 2024 09: 01
              A quality arrow shaft looks like a very elongated spindle) You could make one for yourself if you knew how and had some simple equipment) Warriors in ancient times carried purses with arrowheads. Both as money (iron is expensive) and because any village man can make shafts. And then sell a few bunches, supporting the family budget.
              1. +1
                27 September 2024 09: 23
                Quote: Mikhail3
                A quality arrow's shaft resembles a very elongated spindle.

                The problem is that the arrow must be straight, despite its small thickness. There are plenty of reasons why an initially straight arrow can "lead". It turns out that arrows must be made of solid wood, with good parallelism of fibers of sufficiently large length. For a toy, this is an unaffordable luxury.
                So, a man who understood wood could of course make arrows.
                1. 0
                  27 September 2024 09: 55
                  It shouldn't be straight) There will never be accuracy from a wooden bow, no matter how sophisticated you are. It needs to be like I said) You are right about parallelism, of course. In order to give the arrow the necessary shape, two thick planed boards were used. "Roll" the arrow. The main problem is that you need to know what and how to do.
                  Modern bows have a shape that a wooden bow could never achieve, and the bowstring... well, it's a straight arrow for a bow you can buy in a store now.
                  1. +1
                    27 September 2024 10: 03
                    Quote: Mikhail3
                    In order to give the arrow the necessary shape, two thick planed boards were used. "Roll" the arrow. The main problem is that you need to know what and how to do.
                    Modern bows have a shape that a wooden bow could never achieve, and the bowstring... well, it's a straight arrow for a bow you can buy in a store now.

                    You are right about the accuracy. I have not heard about "rolling" the arrow, thank you. But I tried to do something similar, straightening the blanks.
                    Mostly unsuccessfully, of course.
                    I had an "exclusive" bow) The shape was like a composite one - that's how the branch grew.
        2. 0
          27 September 2024 15: 08
          First of all, a combat one - composite, it is more powerful, but has a complex design, the wood is reinforced with horn and sinew, on top it is all covered with varnish so that it does not come apart in the rain...
  6. 0
    26 September 2024 14: 20
    bow in Russia - a weapon of nobility
    Yeah, but how did the common people hunt?
    And the comparison with Joan of Arc, who was not a rebel, but a savior of the nation and a supporter of the restoration of royal power in France from the French dynasty, is not entirely clear.
    1. 0
      27 September 2024 15: 09
      Later authors began to compare Alena with Zhanna. And they did so quite often.
  7. 0
    26 September 2024 17: 31
    What does not pass will remain
    And what passes will be forgotten
    Alena-Staritsa is sitting in Moscow
    On Lousy Street...
  8. +3
    26 September 2024 21: 20
    In the middle of the 17th century, at the instigation of Cardinal Richelieu, the "media promotion" of Joan of Arc began in France. No, she was known before, and canonized long ago, but the cunning cardinal

    She was canonized in 1920 by Pope Benedict XV.
    And in 1456 they were simply rehabilitated at the instigation of Calixtus III.
    1. 0
      27 September 2024 15: 10
      Exactly! I remember that in the 15th century, they stopped considering her a witch...