MANPADS "Verba": potential and experience of use

16 610 55
MANPADS "Verba": potential and experience of use
Anti-aircraft gunner with a Verba MANPADS


The Russian army has several types of portable anti-aircraft guns in its arsenal. missile complexes. The latest development in this area was the 9K333 "Verba" product, which was adopted for service in 2014. Over 10 years of operation, the new MANPADS have demonstrated all their advantages and have proven themselves to be excellent.



New generation


The promising Verba MANPADS was developed in the 2000s at the Machine-Building Design Bureau (Kolomna) by order of the Ministry of Defense. The goal of the project was to create a new portable means Defense, which would surpass existing models in its characteristics.

The main design work was completed in 2007-2008, after which factory testing of the new product began. In 2011, Verba entered state testing, which also took some time. The promising MANPADS successfully passed all tests and confirmed its calculated tactical and technical characteristics.

By 2012, the developer company had prepared a production line. Then assembly of serial complexes began under a state contract from the Ministry of Defense.

The start of deliveries of the 9K333 MANPADS to the troops became known in early 2014. Subsequently, the defense department and industry regularly reported on new deliveries of such systems. weapons to various units and formations. Production reached a high rate, but the volumes of deliveries, for obvious reasons, were not disclosed.


Educational model of the product 9K333

The new Verba systems became an addition to the Igla family models already in service. Later, as production continued, modern products began to displace their predecessors. According to some data, by the end of the last decade, the 9K333 had displaced other MANPADS and became the most widespread of this class in our armed forces.

Like other weapons, the Verba has been presented on the international market. This development attracts attention at exhibitions, but reliable information about sales has not yet been received. However, at the end of the last decade, foreign media reported on the delivery of a certain number of 9K333 to Armenia.

Applied in practice


The Verba MANPADS was adopted by several branches of the armed forces. The main users, for obvious reasons, were the ground and airborne forces. The systems are also in the Aerospace Forces, Navy, etc. In all cases, they are a short-range air defense system and are used against targets that have managed to pass through other defense echelons.

Since their appearance in the troops, the Verba product has been actively used in various exercises and shooting. Depending on the program of events, electronic or practical missile launches were conducted. In real shooting, air targets of all the main types available in the arsenal of the Russian army were used.

During numerous exercises, the Verba MANPADS demonstrated high potential and the ability to successfully combat all typical air targets. In fact, the success of using this weapon depends only on the level of training and skills of the anti-aircraft gunner. At the same time, the fighters take a responsible approach to training and fully utilize the technical capabilities of their weapons.


Use of "Verba" in a Special Operation: an Airborne Forces soldier monitors the air situation

According to known data, the first episodes of combat use of the Verba against real targets date back to 2017. Russian military personnel participating in the operation in Syria discovered UAV enemy and successfully shot it down with the help of a new domestic MANPADS. Several more such episodes took place later.

Full-scale combat use of 9K333 systems began in February 2022, together with the start of the Special Operation to Demilitarize Ukraine. Such MANPADS are available in almost all units involved in the operation, and they are actively used in all directions.

The enemy still maintains a presence in the air, and the Verb operators are not left without work. They identify and destroy various types of objects. The Ministry of Defense, in turn, regularly reports on various successes of anti-aircraft gunners.

In the early stages of the special operation, Russian MANPADS mainly targeted helicopters and frontline vehicles. aviation enemy. Anti-aircraft gunners account for a significant portion of their losses. However, it is impossible to establish exact numbers and percentages.

Due to the sharp reduction in Ukrainian manned air traffic fleet The nature of the MANPADS operation has changed. Now the main targets for the Verba and other systems are heavy aircraft and copter-type drones. Modern MANPADS successfully track and destroy such targets, despite their small size and limited heat generation.

Russian industry continues mass production of the Verba MANPADS and regularly supplies troops with new batches of these products. The latest such shipment became known several days ago. Along with the portable air defense systems, various auxiliary systems and devices are being sent to the army.


Launch of 9M336 missile at Ukrainian UAV

Modern technology


The 9K333 "Verba" product was developed using accumulated experience in the field of MANPADS, supplemented by modern solutions. Due to this, it was possible to obtain high technical and combat characteristics, while maintaining convenience and ease of use.

The Verba system includes a 9M336 guided missile in a transport and launch container and a 9P521 launch mechanism. In combat situations, the MANPADS can be supplemented with various auxiliary elements, such as a 1L112 compact radar, a 1L229 ground-based friend-or-foe interrogator, mobile command posts, communications equipment, etc.

In terms of dimensions and ergonomics, the Verba MANPADS is no different from earlier systems, such as the Igla. In the combat position, it includes a TPK with a missile with a total length of about 1,8 m with an attached launch mechanism. The launch is carried out from the shoulder with preliminary guidance using the existing sight. The mass of the MANPADS in the combat position is 17,25 kg.

The Verba missile is made in an elongated cylindrical body. Under the nose fairing is the homing head, followed by the warhead. The remaining space of the body is occupied by a solid-fuel engine. The missile is slightly shorter than the TPK and weighs no more than 10-12 kg.

A new three-range seeker was developed for the 9M336 missile. It searches for and tracks targets in the ultraviolet, near and far infrared ranges. Working in three ranges allows for more effective detection of targets with weak radiation. In addition, by comparing radiation of different frequencies, the seeker is able to distinguish real targets from false ones.


Result of combat shooting

The missile hits the target with a 1,5 kg fragmentation warhead. The target sensor is non-contact; its type is not specified.

The solid-fuel engine accelerates the missile to high supersonic speed. It provides a firing range of 6,4 km and hits targets at an altitude of up to 4,5 km. The missile is capable of hitting a target flying at a speed of 400 m/s on a head-on course or 320 m/s on a chase course.

Various methods of transportation and use of the Verba are envisaged. The system can be carried by the operator or transported by any available transport. The development of this idea was the Typhoon-PVO combat vehicle, which transports MANPADS with ammunition and has communications and control facilities for working with other air defense components.

The 9K333 product is also compatible with the Dzhigit support-launcher. In addition, the possibility of using the Verba or other MANPADS is provided for in a number of combat module projects for armored vehicles.

Positive experience


The promising 9K333 Verba MANPADS was adopted by the Russian army 10 years ago. During this time, it has taken its place in the arsenals and is gradually replacing other types of systems. In addition, the system has confirmed its design characteristics in practice and demonstrated high potential.

Over the past years, considerable experience has been accumulated in the operation and combat use of the Verba. This experience shows that this MANPADS has become one of the most successful, useful and significant developments in recent years in the field of air defense. The army continues to use this weapon and will not abandon it in the coming years.
55 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. -8
    23 September 2024 05: 55
    Speaking about the modernity of technologies, we can compare earlier models of the Stinger and Igla MANPADS:

    As for Russian-made MANPADS in general, the probability of hitting a target is low and there are some suggestions for increasing the height...
    In light of the enemy's widespread use of UAVs of various types, it's time to think about the design of something more effective. In addition, I may be wrong, but there are doubts that this MANPADS is guaranteed to hit a helicopter or an airplane...
    1. +10
      23 September 2024 06: 08
      I don't know where you got this information from.
      I have a few others.
      This complex is the most jam-proof in the world. It is more difficult to evade its missile than missiles from other world manufacturers.
      He had a difficult fate. He was ready for state tests in the early 90s. But everything slowed down a bit.
      I would like to remember with kind words the developers of this complex. Those who are no longer with us - fond memories.
      1. -5
        23 September 2024 06: 18
        The British have a new portable anti-aircraft missile system, the Martlet.
        Warhead 3 kg, range 8 km.
        Rumor has it that it shot down our fighter during an attack by Ukrainian saboteurs on a drilling platform in the Black Sea.
        There are photos of launches involving VSU fighters.
        1. +1
          23 September 2024 06: 23
          In 30 years you can do something better.
          If you compare, the main differences are a dual-mode engine and a variety of applications. But omnivorousness did not always help to become the best.
          Time will tell.
          But he said that we have stopped in our development? wink
        2. +2
          23 September 2024 09: 15
          Quote: Lech from Android.
          The British have a new portable anti-aircraft missile system, the Martlet.

          What's in the picture doesn't look much like a portable system. And which of these five missiles is a Martlet? If they're all Martlet, then I have a hard time imagining a portable launch container that would fit into this arsenal.
          1. 0
            23 September 2024 09: 17
            Which of these five missiles is a Martlet?

            Upper.
            The dimensions fit perfectly.
            1. -1
              23 September 2024 09: 21
              Quote: Lech from Android.
              Which of these five missiles is a Martlet?

              Upper.
              The dimensions fit perfectly.

              It doesn't look like it has folding plumage.
              1. 0
                23 September 2024 09: 22
                I haven't found any detailed data yet... off the top of my head, this is what we have. hi
      2. -5
        23 September 2024 06: 19
        Quote: B-15
        I don't know where you got this information from.

        And I'll tell you, from open sources on the Internet...
        stop I couldn’t understand which MANPADS you are talking about: “Igla” or “Verba”?
        1. +1
          23 September 2024 06: 26
          Article about MANPADS "Verba".
          We have been shooting back with Arrows and Needles since 2014.
          1. -4
            23 September 2024 06: 41
            Quote: B-15
            Article about MANPADS "Verba".

            Here too:
            https://hi-news.ru/technology/pochemu-pzrk-verba-namnogo-luchshe-starstreak-i-stinger.html
            * * *
            I cannot deny that the Verba MANPADS is better than some foreign models, but I am not convinced by the high probability of hitting a target if:
            The effectiveness of the American MANPADS significantly lower than Russian — at a target speed of 400 m/sec, the probability of destruction is 0,4 - 0,6.

            What is the effectiveness of the Verba MANPADS? One and a half times higher than the Igla?
            * * *
            And I do not belittle the merits of domestic weapons developers. Only, recently these merits have become very difficult to see (or even hear about).
            I bow before the Soviet developers.
            1. -4
              23 September 2024 08: 27
              The main purpose of MANPADS is to disrupt an attack. Most aircraft can simply evade a MANPADS missile, but the maneuvering required to do so eliminates aimed fire. And makes the use of enemy aircraft ineffective.
              So we need to count not how many missiles were needed to shoot down one aircraft, but how many missiles were needed to disrupt a targeted attack.
              Now let's see how many minuses come flying from the sofas.
              1. +2
                23 September 2024 09: 54
                Quote: garri-lin
                The main purpose of MANPADS is to disrupt an attack.

                The main purpose of the MANPADS is to protect units from enemy aircraft and UAVs. The MSB has (had) an anti-aircraft platoon:
                Anti-aircraft platoon - provides air cover for the battalion using portable anti-aircraft missile systems (9 units of Igla-type MANPADS).
                1. -1
                  23 September 2024 10: 46
                  Protection. Definitely. And the best thing is that the MANPADS are in service.
                  1. 0
                    23 September 2024 10: 48
                    Quote: garri-lin
                    Protection. Definitely.

                    I served in the motorized rifle battalion and I know the purpose of all its units...
                    1. -1
                      23 September 2024 10: 55
                      And? What is more important for a MANPADS? To shoot down or to disrupt an attack?
                      1. +1
                        23 September 2024 13: 00
                        What is more important for a MANPADS? To shoot down or to disrupt an attack?

                        And if the plane is shot down, the attack is not thwarted? It is.
                        But what if a MANPADS launch was carried out, but the pilot did not notice the missile and continued the attack without being shot down?
                        It turns out that it is more important to shoot down.
                      2. +1
                        23 September 2024 13: 37
                        If the pilot did not notice the launch of the missile and the MANPADS shooter studied diligently and knows what to do, the aircraft will be shot down with a probability of 0,8 - 0,9 for Verba.
                        And where there are MANPADS, aircraft fly only when absolutely necessary. Not like before. But only when absolutely necessary. And they work ineffectively. Like launches from a cabin.
      3. 0
        23 September 2024 08: 52
        Quote: B-15
        This complex is the most noise-resistant in the world.

        Any homing head can be suppressed, diverted by interference. The most interference-resistant system is the one with laser path guidance, like Tunguska. It definitely cannot be diverted by interference. The only option is intensive maneuvering, but even that is so-so. One minus, the operator has to track the target for a long time. If you make the guidance automatic, then the problem of target recognition and diverting the missile to a false one will come up again. Look at the experience of using Stingers on the SVO, the guidance is no worse than Verba, but they are launched in batches without much success.
        1. +5
          23 September 2024 19: 51
          You're wrong.
          Stinger is two-colored.
          Willow is a tricolor.
          The article clearly states this.
          So, by definition, the Stinger is less resistant to interference.
          Basically, Stinger = Eagle.
          1. +1
            23 September 2024 21: 26
            Quote: B-15
            Stinger is two-colored.
            Willow is a tricolor.

            This is true, but the Stinger's image recognition program switches on at the final section. Ranges of at least three or five can be suppressed by interference, but the image is more complex.
            1. +1
              23 September 2024 21: 38
              You can't fake far infrared. Our developers have been working on it.
              But it is very, very difficult to deceive all three colors in a complex manner.
            2. 0
              24 September 2024 06: 03
              there is no pattern recognition there, only Sidewinder-X and Python-5 have TPGSN, maybe they did something on Mika, but there are none on MANPADS
        2. +2
          23 September 2024 20: 41
          distract with interference.

          If Verba has an ultra-violet range, then this is work by contrast - the atmosphere glows ultra-violet, the target does not. Guidance is carried out by this contrasting shadow. Try to come up with an obstacle.
          1. 0
            23 September 2024 21: 30
            Quote: dauria
            Try to come up with an obstacle.

            Any signal can be generated. No problems. At a glance, an aerosol cloud absorbing ultraviolet, and on the surface of the atmosphere a spot more contrasting than the target.
            1. 0
              23 September 2024 21: 31
              Wow, how simple it is for you. And how will you bypass the speed selection?
              1. 0
                23 September 2024 21: 34
                Quote: dauria
                How will you bypass the speed selection?

                There is a variant of a mobile interference, like a mini-arquette with spray. But it can be simpler, interference and a sharp maneuver, as a rule, the GSN does not have time.
                1. 0
                  23 September 2024 21: 49
                  The seeker always manages to do so, it is just an "eye". And the missile itself, with proportional guidance, maneuvers no more than the target and flies to the lead point. And do not forget that the interference must imitate the target in three ranges at once, smoothly moving away from the target. In this case, the general center of brightness of the target plus interference is accompanied. And as it approaches, either the target or the interference comes out of the general angle. As luck would have it.
                  1. +1
                    23 September 2024 21: 53
                    Yes, all this is true, but again, all in theory. In practice, it flies wherever it can. Before my eyes, two Strela-10s were successively redirected to the cloud during exercises. Each solution has its pros and cons. The only criterion is the practice of combat missions. But no one will ever tell us the statistics of launches and defeats.
                    1. +1
                      25 September 2024 00: 35
                      Quote: qqqq
                      Before my eyes, two Strela-10s were successively redirected to the cloud during exercises.

                      Most likely, the operator started the seeker in photocontrast mode, and in the presence of clouds it is not recommended to do this.
                      1. 0
                        25 September 2024 18: 13
                        Quote: Comet
                        Most likely, the operator launched the seeker in photocontrast mode.

                        No, I heard the ether, heat-contrast, and both. Nitrogen was supplied.
                  2. +1
                    25 September 2024 00: 43
                    Quote: dauria
                    And the missile itself, with proportional guidance, maneuvers no more than the target.

                    In the vicinity of the target, the SAM overload is higher than the target overload.
                    Quote: dauria
                    In this case, the general center of brightness is accompanied by the target plus interference.

                    So in the radar range. In the IR range it is different.
                  3. +1
                    25 September 2024 00: 50
                    Quote: dauria
                    And don't forget that the interference must imitate the target in three ranges at once and smoothly move away from the target.

                    The target radiation (nozzle, wing edges, exhaust pipes, batteries) is already practically absent in the visible range, and in the UV range it is completely negligible, unlike IR traps.
          2. 0
            24 September 2024 06: 04
            blind with a laser, which is what BKO does
          3. +3
            25 September 2024 00: 47
            Quote: dauria
            If Verba has an ultra-violet range, then this is a work of contrast - the atmosphere glows with ultra-violet, the target does not.

            The UV channel is a channel for interference protection. Due to the high temperature, IR traps glow not only in the visible but also in the UV range.
        3. +1
          25 September 2024 00: 31
          Quote: qqqq
          The most jam-resistant complex with laser path guidance, like Tunguska.

          Tunguska does not have a laser path.
          Quote: qqqq
          The only option is intensive maneuvering, but even that is so-so.

          The laser trail has the same problems as the three-point. And the maneuverability of the MANPADS SAM is low.
    2. -1
      23 September 2024 09: 02
      there are doubts that this MANPADS is capable of reliably hitting a helicopter or an airplane...

      A tank can be guaranteed to hit a helicopter or an airplane from a distance of 100 m at an airfield, and this helicopter or airplane must be anchored to the runway. Verba is currently one of the best MANPADS in the world, only its 9M336 SAM has a three-spectrum homing head, operating in the ultraviolet, near infrared and mid-infrared ranges, this gives a chance of hitting a target in the forward hemisphere of 0,7-0,8 per SAM.
    3. +2
      25 September 2024 02: 59
      Quote: ROSS 42
      then the probability of hitting the target is low and there are some suggestions for increasing the height.

      Igla had 0,6, Verba (according to those involved) raised it to 0,75. Not enough? No, you can, like the Americans, write 0,99 or even 1,01. Only here even the developers of "large" complexes do not stoop to such a level.
      Increase the range? And how will you aim? Even at 5 km there is already a problem of finding the target with the operator's eyes. That is why for many years now Igla and Verba have been installed on various platforms with the ability to use radar and OLS. The most advanced is Gibka-S.
  2. +2
    23 September 2024 07: 57
    It's good, of course, that "Verba" is produced in such quantities that it displaces various modifications of "Igla"! But something hasn't been heard about the development of the "Metka" MANPADS for a long time!
  3. +1
    23 September 2024 08: 55
    The target sensor is non-contact; its type is not specified

    For such low-flying targets, infrared is most likely...
    1. +1
      23 September 2024 09: 18
      The "Igla" also has a non-contact fuse, but not an infrared one!
      1. +2
        23 September 2024 09: 52
        I read about “potential”, but not about “experience of use”.
  4. -2
    23 September 2024 10: 16
    Of course, I'm not an expert, but it's time to make a complex that works at a range of a couple of kilometers and at an altitude of up to 1 km, so that it would be 2 times smaller, XNUMX to XNUMX times cheaper, more than enough for a UAV.
    1. +2
      23 September 2024 10: 44
      Twice as much is 10 kg from a cheap drone?? Which can fly in packs?
      If you do it in the size of the Fly, which is an RPG. Only the head that can capture the drone will still be complex and expensive. They emit almost nothing. No heat or noise.
      1. 0
        23 September 2024 11: 39
        Everything has been invented before us. It can be done just like this - the cost is a pittance, cheaper than drones.
        But it’s better to at least be a little clever with the detonator.
        1. 0
          23 September 2024 13: 31
          If I'm not mistaken, something similar happened in the USSR in the 50s and 60s. And if sclerosis doesn't fail, it was also called Willow.
          But how can you hit drones with something like that???
          1. 0
            23 September 2024 13: 43
            Quote: garri-lin
            But how can you hit drones with something like that???

            The same as for low-flying subsonic aircraft - for which it was developed and tested
            1. +2
              23 September 2024 15: 11
              Well, it's not funny. Where is the plane: 7-8 meters in projection.
              Where is the drone with half a meter. A mass drone from a kilometer away and it is hard to see.
              1. +1
                23 September 2024 18: 31
                Of course it's not funny. A mass UAV, the fragments of which destroy protected arsenals - just a wingspan of 10 m. Some are smaller, some are larger. But the order of magnitude is like that.
                1. +1
                  23 September 2024 18: 35
                  A UAV with a 10-meter wingspan requires a full-fledged air defense system. Not a surrogate.
                  1. +2
                    23 September 2024 18: 53
                    There is none, neither full-fledged nor ersatz. Or rather, there was none. I'm talking about Toropets.
                    And about the ersatz. There are several levels of target interception. And if a lawn mower is rattling over your head (or almost over your head), then at least something more powerful than a machine gun is better.
                    1. 0
                      24 September 2024 08: 10
                      Your logic is strange. What do you mean there is nothing?? After all, it is fragments that fly in, not whole UAVs, someone destroys them. Everything is there.
          2. 0
            26 September 2024 14: 46
            If I'm not mistaken, something similar happened in the USSR in the 50s and 60s.

            Do you mean "Kolos"?
            1. +1
              26 September 2024 20: 36
              Sclerosis has changed. Yes, Kolos. Why I remembered him as Verba I don't understand myself.
              Thank you for correcting.
  5. +1
    25 September 2024 21: 20
    Verba is a really top-notch MANPADS, the only thing I like from the West is the British Starstreak or whatever it's called, which can be effectively used against equipment (except tanks), which is good both for self-defense of army air defense units and in cases of asymmetric conflicts, when the enemy either has no or very few air attack weapons... A similar complex in addition to Verba (not as a replacement, but as an addition) would be interesting...
    Regarding Verbs/Iglas, why not recruit air defense specialists for a good salary, to cover cities and important infrastructure... Provide a good salary, give guarantees that the service is not in the SVO zone, but on the territory of the region where the conscription is taking place (or specified regions, if the conscription is from distant entities)... Airfields can be covered, large radars, and even oil refineries... Recruit even specialized officers, discharged after a week of service... If physical fitness is good, you can take them up to 65 years old... Train the guys, hand out Verbs and Iglas, in theory even arrows, because they should be able to cope with slow-moving UAVs, get them from warehouses and hand them out, reinforce them with gun trucks with machine guns...
    Then all you have to do is properly organize the service and notification of approaching aircraft... And you can intercept 99% of UAVs...
    Give people a salary of 150-200k with a guarantee of non-participation in their own and people will go to work, and many of them, and you can also choose the best and set a condition that if you oversleep - you'll be fired and we'll take the next ones...