
The state of Ukraine has existed for more than 20 years, during which the fourth figure is performing the duties of president. Enough time has passed before the state, called independent, could become such in fact. In this article I will try to draw the reader’s attention to the ideological line around which the “Ukrainian statehood” has been built all these years. I take this expression in quotation marks, implying a figure of speech firmly rooted through millions of repetitions into the consciousness of the population of Ukraine.
Despite the simplicity of the ideological rationale of "Square", it is extremely important to understand what this rationale is based on in order to reveal the source from which official Kiev derives its legitimacy all these years. It can be compared with a well, which is strictly guarded, so that no one will know what it is for the well, from which the population of Ukraine has been watered for over 20 years. And this is completely unsurprising, for it says: Russophobia.
Imagine that one rich person, experiencing temporary difficulties, distributed for temporary storage all his wealth to his neighbors. The neighbors, realizing that the owner might not return, and realizing that all wealth could be appropriated to themselves, quickly came up with a rationale that the wealth they had always belonged to. That the cruel and brutal master simply by force appropriated all the good to himself, which rightfully belongs to them, his neighbors. And that it always belonged to them, and who does not believe, can read the latest "textbooks stories», In which all this is described in detail. So there is no doubt - this is all ours, and who is against, that occupier. And if he resists, then we will call the “civilized world”, he will arrive and confirm.
This metaphor depicts the nature of power in almost all CIS countries. Including in Ukraine. At the same time, it is important to divide Ukraine as a native land and as a state. I am talking about the political regime in Ukraine established by the Americans after the 1991 year. Nouveau riche regime, who totally disowned history and the people and invented his own “history”, justifying his betrayal. Story of Ukraine. That is the way to translate into English that official “history of Ukraine”, which is obligatory for study in all schools and universities.
Everything is very simple. In order for people to take away something, the easiest way is to impress that they do not need it. In order to rob the people of their homeland, you need to demonize it and replace the new "homeland". Independent, democratic, European integration. Not that “backward Russia”. Because if Russia is not backward, then all propaganda crumbles like a house of cards. This can not be allowed. To this end, all over the media from morning to night rivers are pouring in “evidence” of how “human rights” are oppressed in Russia, the authorities are afraid of everything, and people are limited in everything. Of course, everything is done correctly, at the level of the background, embedded in the subconscious. Such a nice-sweet background, on which your nightmare is perceived almost as a holiday.
And how else, tell me, prove that part of the Russian land should not be together with the rest of Russia? If the anti-Russian hysteria is stopped, the truth will become obvious: since some part of the Russian land exists apart from all of Russia, then by this very fact it claims its anti-Russianness. Therefore, the image of the enemy - just what you need. And they mold it very carefully.
Russophobia is the only source of legitimacy of any "independent" power in Ukraine. The absence of Russophobia automatically casts doubt on its legitimacy of power, since a reasonable question arises: why is it needed at all then, this “independent” power? Therefore, the official authorities are forced to prove to everyone, but above all to themselves, their legitimacy by protection from the “Russian enemy”.
Hence the conclusion: no matter how Russian the candidate for presidency of Ukraine may be, he can never become a Russian president. For who will he be then as a result of reunification with the rest of Russia? Just one of. It is not by chance that Yanukovych publicly rejected the state status of the Russian language literally one week after the inauguration, publicly betraying all his voters.
The very logic of the existence of the state of Ukraine, separate from the rest of Russia, dictates the Kiev authorities Russophobic line. When things are going really bad and we need to somehow make excuses, the next gas war with Russia is being started with cries about “enslaving conditions” and “unfair gas prices” (as if this were not the official leadership of Ukraine entered into a contract). If Russia builds South Stream, leaving Ukraine alone with its gas transport system, then it is even worse. You should have seen that hysteria, which professional Ukrainians have turned up about the “South Stream” (there is such a profession in Ukraine, which is very profitable, by the way, and well paid). Remember the words of the barmaid from “Striped Flight”: “He finds fault with me, he doesn’t pay attention to me at all”? This is exactly the case.
It would seem that official Kiev should rejoice at breaking the “enslaving” ties with Russia. But the fact of the matter is that Ukraine does not want to be independent, because then you have to take responsibility for the degradation that has been going on for 20 years. Therefore, it is very convenient to take this position: we are going “to Europe” and we wanted to spit on Russia, but since we are fraternal peoples, then pay us our “European integration”. Yeah, you don't want to see, we said that the Russians want to capture us! This is a win-win position. Only now its win-win was based on the potential that went to Ukraine from the USSR. And this potential is very quickly exhausted ...
Will there be enough courage in the authorities to admit their betrayal and apostasy and take the path of correction? I do not think that she is capable of this, seeing the monstrous evil that she deliberately carries to her people, and that sea of lies in which she is stuck. At the same time, I do not mean a particular government at all (they all stand for each other), but I mean the last 20 years as a whole. Any authority in Ukraine always blames the previous one, but all together they even more strongly blame Russia. But how else from myself suspicions take?
We, the patriots of our United Russian Fatherland, should not be mistaken about the patriotism of the authorities in Ukraine, which will inevitably be Russophobic neo-Nazi in nature, as long as this part of Russia considers itself “independent”. The clue is that Ukraine, as the territory from which the local oligarchy feeds, tends to be not independent of any external influences, but “Square” against the rest of Russia, receiving for this as a reward from the “civilized” owners of this territory. Because for them, Ukraine is not a homeland, no matter how much they may boast of their patriotism, but a territory, on the transit status of which you can parasitize carelessly. And all the actions of the official Kiev are reduced to one thing - to sell the territorial-geopolitical resource called Ukraine as profitably as possible.
Those who love the Fatherland, who live alone with the thought of his reunification, will never accept the divisive ideology of the Ukrainians, in the sin of the pride of the intended. We will forever, whatever happens, we will remain loyal to the Russian state and the Russian Orthodox Church! And be sure to reunite Holy Russia!