Kazakh authorities have announced their intention to continue to comply with Western sanctions against Russia

7 495 46
Kazakh authorities have announced their intention to continue to comply with Western sanctions against Russia

The Kazakh government has announced that the country fully complies with Western sanctions against Russia. According to the head of the Kazakh Ministry of Economy, Nurlan Baibazarov, cases of violating anti-Russian sanctions are isolated and are immediately stopped.

According to the Kazakh official, if suspicious transactions are detected, the accounts of potential violators are immediately closed, and companies suspected of attempting to circumvent sanctions against Russia are subject to inspection.



Baibazarov noted that since the introduction of anti-Russian sanctions, only two Kazakhstani companies have been caught violating the sanctions regime; by their nature of activity, they turned out to be "one-day firms" created for the purchase and resale of certain types of goods. After these operations were carried out, the violating companies were immediately closed, but they managed to come to the attention of financial intelligence, after which it was decided to include them in the sanctions lists.

It is noted that after some Western companies announced their withdrawal from the Russian market, and banks were restricted in their ability to make payments in Western currencies, Kazakhstan actually began to function as one of the main hubs for importing goods into the Russian Federation. However, in April last year, Astana tightened control over the movement of goods across the border of the EAEU, after which a ban was imposed on the export of 106 types of sanctioned products to Russia.
46 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +19
    11 September 2024 18: 27
    Well done Kazakhs, you thanked Russia and the Russian people for everything.

    I'm just wondering, what would Kazakhstan lose if it declared that it would not impose any sanctions against Russia? Nothing.

    What would you gain? The most reliable ally on this planet.
    1. 0
      11 September 2024 18: 33
      No, Kazakhstan could lose a lot, because then the West and the USA could impose sanctions against it.
      1. +14
        11 September 2024 18: 38
        No, Kazakhstan could lose a lot, because then the West and the USA could impose sanctions against it.


        How many things have been introduced against India, China, Serbia?

        The more countries bend to the US, the more they will be bent.

        Now the US will force the Kazakhs to introduce several genders for their citizens and hold a gay parade.
        1. 0
          11 September 2024 19: 20
          So India and China are actually complying with sanctions.
        2. +1
          12 September 2024 13: 15
          Somehow the moon-faced neighbors on the shores have gotten confused... Or is there not enough room for them even on two chairs (Russia and China)?
      2. +13
        11 September 2024 18: 42
        For example, India and China have stated that they will maintain a neutral position. Kazakhstan has not done so. Russia needs to take this into account in its future relations.
        1. +9
          11 September 2024 18: 52
          I have friends in Omsk who work remotely with an Indian company, writing computer programs. When SVO began, the Indians asked them to leave Russia to continue their cooperation. The friends had to go to Kazakhstan and set up a server with some acquaintances there, through which they now communicate with the Indians.
          So India is also afraid of violating sanctions.
          1. +5
            11 September 2024 19: 37
            Lenin and the Bolshevik-Trotskyists should not have followed the lead of the West and divided the territory of Soviet Russia into national republics according to the national principle of the so-called "titular nationality"!

            Everything that we have now in Russia with the same foreign migrants from Central Asia in Russia's migration policy and in relations with countries in the post-Soviet space is the historical legacy of the Russophobic idiocy of the Bolshevik-Marxists of the Trotskyist-Leninist guard.

            If Lenin with his Russophobic "PRO-DETARIAN INTERNATIONALISM" had not stepped down from state power due to illness in 1922-23 and died in 1924, and if Stalin had not purge the party in 1937-38, the USSR would have lost the Great Patriotic War much earlier than 1941!
            1. +3
              11 September 2024 19: 54
              The development of SOVIET Russia, the world's first socialist state, was twofold - controversial - in nature.
              On the one hand, the Russian people, who believed in the communist idea of ​​the Bolshevik-Leninists, and, being the bearer of the sovereign mentality, on all fronts of social construction really created socialism within the framework of the whole country as their entire multinational Motherland. As a matter of fact, he had nothing else to do.
              But at the same time, on the other hand, in the former tsarist national outskirts, where feudal relations still prevailed and there was no own national proletariat, the petty national bourgeoisie and former local feudal lords received power from the Bolshevik-Leninists and under their control. The national industry was already being built by the hands of the Russian and Russian-speaking peoples. Wherein everything that was really created national during the years of Soviet power in the once backward tsarist national outskirts - the national republics - is only the local national party and Soviet bureaucracy, as well as the national creative intelligentsia serving it (social scientists, writers, artists, etc.). This national party and Soviet intelligentsia objectively retained the national bourgeois-feudal mentality not only in relation to their own working people, but also in relation to the Russians who came, in their opinion, to “hunch at them” up to the time of the so-called Gorbachev "new thinking".

              In this way, national problems in the Soviet Union were not only from the very beginning of Soviet power, but also had a national-Bourgeois class character in relation to the Russian people. Bourgeois the coup d'etat in the USSR in 1991 as a whole only raised from the bottom to the surface, like a counter-bourgeois time bomb since 1917, the national-bourgeois deformations that had already taken place during the construction of socialism in Russia, which the Soviet leadership tried not to give wide publicity.
        2. +2
          11 September 2024 20: 56
          However, Kazakhstan borders Russia and this cannot be changed. So the situation is ambiguous, since Kazakh millionaires keep their money in dollars, and American oil companies essentially control the oil fields and production.
        3. +3
          11 September 2024 22: 33
          Quote: Blacksmith 55
          Kazakhstan did not do this. Russia needs to take this into account in future relations.

          We must be state-minded people, not prostitutes in power. Our brave "daddy" has more than enough of those. Russia supplies water from the lower reaches of the Volga, it goes on an industrial scale to 3 provinces of Kazakhstanstat. Maybe it's time to stop squandering our resources, this will make "partners" more loyal. hi
          1. +3
            11 September 2024 23: 13
            Quote: kapitan92
            Quote: Blacksmith 55
            Kazakhstan did not do this. Russia needs to take this into account in future relations.

            We must be state-minded people, not prostitutes in power. Our brave "daddy" has plenty of those. Russia supplies water from the lower reaches of the Volga, it goes on an industrial scale to 3 provinces of Kazakhstanstat. Maybe it's time to stop squandering its resources, this will make "partners" more loyal. hi

            Support!
            Water is more important to Kazakhstan than American money, unless, of course, the leadership of Kazakhstan itself, together with its families, has dual citizenship and does not intend to soon move and live in another country - for example, in the same America.
      3. +2
        11 September 2024 20: 32
        Quote: Kronos
        Kazakhstan could lose a lot of autumn

        so they comply and at the same time - Mishustin - "Russia ranks first among Kazakhstan's foreign trade partners, last year mutual trade turnover amounted to more than 2,5 trillion rubles or 12 trillion 600 billion tenge and exceeded the record figure of 2022." https://tass.ru/ekonomika/20148841
        Kazakhstan hasn't really benefited from the sanctions, if after the start of the Soviet Union the Armenian GDP has jumped to 12%, then the Kazakhs have 3% with a bit... They are observing and observing, trade is going on... they are waiting, let them wait...
    2. +6
      11 September 2024 18: 40
      Read between the lines. We do it, we caught two(!) fly-by-night firms. The East is a delicate matter © .
      1. +14
        11 September 2024 18: 44
        Quote: tur-tur
        Read between the lines.

        Let's read. Introduce sanctions of the Russian Federation against Kazakhstan. Let them read between the lines now.
        1. 0
          12 September 2024 18: 48
          Let them return northern Kazakhstan. Factories, airports, railways and yurts. It is more comfortable to live there - there is more dung than in the city.
    3. +2
      11 September 2024 18: 41
      Are you aware of who controls the foundation of the Kazakh economy - the fuel and raw materials sector? They didn't even have the right to say that he rejected sanctions. The West has a noose around Kazakhstan's neck. However, there are plenty of local jerks there too.
    4. +3
      11 September 2024 19: 06
      Of course, you laughed about a reliable ally. You noticed that we actually have no allies. Think about it, why is that?
      1. +5
        11 September 2024 19: 16
        Because those who do not respect themselves, no one wants to be friends with them, much less be allies. Because our foreign policy has been so miserable and toothless for the last 30 years that everyone who wants to is wiping their feet on it.
        We could force neighboring countries to do what we need, but for this we need statesmen in power and not officials who are only interested in schemes.
      2. 0
        11 September 2024 19: 33
        Russia has only two allies: the army and the navy... and North Korea... three
        1. +1
          11 September 2024 19: 54
          Moreover, they spat at the third ally with all their might. But I had to drag myself to the well...
      3. +4
        11 September 2024 20: 23
        And so, if you think about it: who has reliable allies? Maybe China or India, maybe Brazil or Argentina? Doesn't seem like it. In general, everyone thinks about their own interests, and only the hegemon has loyal dogs in Europe, who are allies only in one issue: how to defeat and rip apart Russia, and in other respects they also hate (only quietly) the USA.
    5. +2
      11 September 2024 19: 40
      I'm just wondering, what would Kazakhstan lose if it declared that it would not impose any sanctions against Russia? Nothing.

      What would you buy? The most reliable ally on this planet.

      That's for sure. Armenia won't let you lie.
    6. +3
      11 September 2024 20: 10
      Quote: Ratmir_Ryazan
      I'm just wondering, what would Kazakhstan lose if it declared that it would not impose any sanctions against Russia? Nothing.

      there was already one story - in one of the American banks, funds of the National Fund of Kazakhstan in the amount of almost 22 billion dollars were frozen. https://topwar.ru/132826-v-ssha-zamorozheny-milliardy-dollarov-nacfonda-kazahstana.html
      Now many people are waiting to see how things will end in Ukraine - and only after that will they make a choice
    7. -1
      13 September 2024 13: 52
      Kazakhstan, while outwardly complying with the sanctions, itself avoided sanctions and continued to supply us with products on the sly. Theoretically. I mean, this is an assumption
  2. +12
    11 September 2024 18: 28
    It is better to have a good enemy than such a "friend"
    1. +2
      11 September 2024 18: 35
      it is the best to make friends with people of character and only partners with the others. unfortunately, russia does the opposite - decides who are the friends, then looks for favorable arguments.
      It is best to be friends with people with a strong character and cooperate only with the rest. Unfortunately, Russia does the opposite - decides who is a friend and then looks for favorable arguments.
  3. +3
    11 September 2024 18: 32
    The Kazakh government has announced that the country is in full compliance with Western sanctions against Russia.

    Ate? What did you expect from the eternally offended and deprived?
    And how will we cope now without Kazakh bread and electricity... crying
    * * *
    An uninvited guest is worse than a Kazakh...
    1. 0
      11 September 2024 18: 42
      Here's more about Kazakh bread, please... If this isn't banter... Here's a stream of our own going to Novorossiysk.
      1. +4
        11 September 2024 18: 46
        Quote from: dmi.pris1
        Here's more about Kazakh bread, please... If this isn't banter...

        Yes, God be with you... This is banter, of course... This is about virgin land bread and electricity from Russia...
        And also, as my sergeant major said:
        We taught you to walk standing up when you need to pee...
  4. +4
    11 September 2024 18: 33
    Every Judas will get what he deserves
  5. +2
    11 September 2024 18: 40
    And why the hell did the Russian president help Tokayev avoid a coup? To appear kind? But he turned out weak.
    1. +4
      11 September 2024 19: 07
      yes, they've already tired me out with this "love spell" that Tokayev himself organized to remove Nazik from power
    2. The comment was deleted.
  6. +5
    11 September 2024 18: 42
    Well, there is no need to have such friends and enemies. After all, Kazakhstan is our strategic partner in the CSTO and the EurAsEC. Indeed, a friend in need is a friend indeed.
  7. The comment was deleted.
  8. +2
    11 September 2024 18: 49
    An indicator of Russia's strength, power and authority
  9. +1
    11 September 2024 18: 53
    friendship is friendship, but tobacco is apart. Yes, and probably right, only the chicken rakes in the dough and another country
  10. -1
    11 September 2024 19: 01
    In principle, one can understand Kazakhstan. If only it could go all out now, but then bam and "a deal with partners". The blogger's father-in-law won't let him lie. So what should Kazakhstan do then?
    In general, everything is predictable.
  11. +3
    11 September 2024 19: 04
    Kazakh authorities have announced their intention to continue to comply with Western sanctions against Russia
    not surprised at all
  12. +1
    11 September 2024 19: 16
    Probably, the statement of the Government of Kazakhstan, "about the country's full compliance with Western sanctions against Russia" is of an "entourage-diplomatic" nature (to divert the "shadow" from the "fence") or another "throw" into the information space of another "disinformation" from the "depths" of the TsIPSO or MI-6.... This "info" is difficult to "dovetail" with the volume of cargo flows from Kazakhstan and our "counter" deliveries of critically important equipment to ensure the defense capability of Kazakhstan... At least there are no official comments from either side to this government information... This should "alert" those wishing to rush into an accusatory propaganda "battle"...
  13. +2
    11 September 2024 19: 17
    however, we managed to get there in the field of view of financial intelligence, after which there was a decision was made to include them in the sanctions lists.

    Financial intelligence of Kazakhstan?! The Kazakhs included their closed companies in the sanctions lists?! But if you add the US, then everything falls into place.
  14. +3
    11 September 2024 19: 21
    Everything in life comes at a price...
    And the Kazakhs will have to too Yes
  15. +2
    11 September 2024 19: 41
    These are the brothers! I hope that the water issue is closed for them forever!
  16. The comment was deleted.
  17. The comment was deleted.
  18. +1
    11 September 2024 20: 10
    Quote: Aleksey1052
    Quote: ROSS 42
    The Kazakh government has announced that the country is in full compliance with Western sanctions against Russia.

    Ate? What did you expect from the eternally offended and deprived?
    And how will we cope now without Kazakh bread and electricity... crying
    * * *
    An uninvited guest is worse than a Kazakh...

    An uninvited guest is better than a Kazakh...

    Oh, come on. I served both my term and then some. Normal people, with their quirks. (Who doesn't?) I didn't like Kazakh women. Not because they were ugly, they were photo models. But their attitude towards men, it's like a dream, but for some reason you want it. This is from my own memories in the late 80s.
    In general, if you don't take into account
    1. +1
      11 September 2024 20: 16
      In general, if you don’t take into account that this is (..)
      Quite normal.
      That's what I couldn't forgive them for in the distant 80s - the huge amount of onion in any dish. No, I like onion, but if its quantity exceeds all reasonable limits. Well, for example, for a couple of manti - an onion. (There was meat, but there was definitely too much onion) However, I'm Russian and some people find okroshka and kholodets inedible. :)
  19. +1
    11 September 2024 22: 48
    It is high time to introduce retaliatory sanctions against those who support sanctions against us.
  20. +2
    11 September 2024 23: 07
    Russia has a lot of leverage over Kazakhstan - electricity, water, oil transit, for example. Kazakhs can be hurt very badly, if there is political will