Guided complex of missile and bomb weapons "Thunder" in the Special Operation

47
Guided complex of missile and bomb weapons "Thunder" in the Special Operation
The Grom ammunition at one of the domestic exhibitions. Photo by Rosoboronexport


Recently, the Russian Aerospace Forces received a unique guided missile and bomb weapon system called "Grom". Since last year, the Russian military has been using it to strike Ukrainian targets. So far, only a few episodes of its use are known, but even in this case, the system is of great interest.



Combat application


The first information about the possible use of the guided missile and bomb weapon system (GBMW) "Grom" was reported in March 2023, during the battle for the settlement of Avdiivka. At that time, the enemy discovered fragments of an unknown device near its positions - probably an aircraft weapon.

It was a fragment of a cylindrical body with a wing that had a folding mechanism. There was no marking on the wreckage that would allow the type of product to be determined. However, the characteristic external appearance of the wreckage led to the emergence of a version about the use of a bomb or missile from the Grom complex.

It is unknown why large fragments of the munition ended up on the ground. It may have fallen and been destroyed by external impact or due to a breakdown. Unfortunately, not all new products can demonstrate 100% efficiency.

Given the specifics of the VKS work, there is reason to believe that other products from the UK RBV "Grom" were used in that period and in that direction. The enemy did not find their fragments, and this is an indirect confirmation of the effectiveness of such weapons.


The Grom product, side view. Photo by Rosoboronexport

Subsequently, new information about the use of the UK RBV "Grom" in different directions appeared several times. Messages of this kind were received quite rarely, which could indicate episodic use of the new weapon. It seems that the new complex is not used actively and only complements other ASP in certain situations.

A curious episode occurred several days ago. On August 31, the Russian Aerospace Forces launched a series of strikes against the enemy in the city of Kharkov. After clearing the rubble of one of the destroyed objects, the Ukrainian city leadership stated that a Grom-E1 guided bomb was used in the strike.

Unlike previous episodes, no evidence was provided for this. No details followed either. Did our aviation in this strike the newest ammunition is unknown. It is worth noting that the Kharkov leadership for some reason mentioned the export version of the guided bomb, which has the letter "E" in its name. This probably indicates the level of its knowledge of Russian weapons.

Modern development


The Tactical Missile Weapons Corporation first spoke about the RBV Grom project back in 2015 at the MAKS aerospace show. Mock-ups of new ammunition in export performance were presented, and some features of the project were revealed, such as goals and objectives, key decisions, and the main tactical and technical characteristics of finished products.

In mid-2017, KTRV reported that it had conducted flight tests of two munitions of the new family. They were tested in the conditions of the proving ground and demonstrated their capabilities when working with standard carriers. This stage was planned to be completed in the coming months.


Presumably, debris from the Grom product, March 2023. Photo Telegram / Dambiev

In August 2019, at the forum “Army» KTRV announced the readiness of the new products "Grom-E1" and "Grom-E2" for serial production. The corporation was ready to accept orders, manufacture export ammunition and send them to customers.

According to various sources, during this period the possibility of adopting the UK RBV "Grom" into service with the Russian Aerospace Forces was considered. This issue was successfully resolved, as a result of which the relevant documents were issued, and KTRV launched production of the new weapon. However, there is no exact information about the start date of production and deliveries of "Grom", the size of the order, etc.

Since at least last spring, Grom products have been used in the Special Operation. They are used by frontline aviation along with other types of ASP. At the same time, the new UK RBV plays an auxiliary role for now. Grom series products, due to their limited quantity, are used only in individual cases as a kind of supplement to other weapons.

Unified designs


"Grom" is a complex of guided aircraft weapons with a modular architecture. It consists of several modules for various purposes, which can be combined to create ammunition of the required type with the required characteristics.

The Thunder is based on some of the developments and components of the Kh-38 air-to-surface missile. However, the new project used completely new architectural and layout solutions, which led to significant differences between the Thunder and the previously created missile.


View from another angle. You can see the wing folding mechanism. Photo Telegram / Dambiev

"Thunder" consists of five main devices: the main warhead module (MBCho), the additional warhead module (MBChd), the planning and control module (PCM), the propulsion module (PMU) and the steering drive module (SDM).

The warhead and propulsion modules are made in cylindrical housings; the MBCh has an ogive fairing. The diameter of the modules is 310 mm, and their length is 2,35 m for the main warhead and 1,13 m for the additional one. The main warhead can be equipped with a high-explosive fragmentation charge weighing 315 kg or a volumetric detonating charge weighing 250 kg. The additional warhead can have a high-explosive fragmentation charge weighing 165 kg or a thermobaric charge weighing 120 kg.

The planning and control module is equipped with a folding wing for flight to the target. It also houses the autopilot, which issues commands to the MRP, and the satellite and inertial navigation systems. It was also reported that a homing head could be developed for the Grom.

The autopilot guides the bomb or missile to the target using pre-loaded coordinates. Such a control system is capable of flying along a simple trajectory or maneuvering. For example, it is claimed that it is possible to launch a missile/bomb into the rear hemisphere relative to the carrier aircraft, although this reduces the maximum range.

The MBChO, MDU, MPU and MRP modules are used to assemble the 9-A-7759 or Grom-1 (export version Grom-E1) guided air missile. Its total weight reaches 594 kg, and it is capable of delivering a warhead to a range of up to 120 km.


Architecture of the product "Thunder". Graphics of KTRV

The Grom-2 or 9-A1-7759 (export version of the Grom-E2) is a gliding guided bomb. It includes two warhead modules with a total load of up to 480 kg, as well as gliding and rudder modules. Due to the lack of an engine, the flight range is reduced to 65 km.

The Grom is carried by all the main aircraft of the domestic frontline aviation, primarily the Su-34 frontline bombers. However, it can also be carried by fighter-bombers of current models. The drop is carried out at a speed of up to 1200 km/h and an altitude of up to 10 km.

Modular approach


The UK RBV "Grom" is an interesting example of the use of a modular approach to the creation of airborne weapons. KTRV developed a set of modules based on an existing missile, from which it is possible to assemble ammunition of different classes with the required characteristics.

The modular architecture of the Grom project simplifies and reduces the cost of mass production of missiles and bombs of the complex. Common control components significantly facilitate preparation and combat use.

The idea of ​​two warhead modules deserves special attention. This allows the operator to choose between a missile with a longer range and a bomb with a more powerful warhead. Such a complex should be a flexible combat instrument.

The Russian Aerospace Forces have long tested the new UK RBV "Grom" and gave it a high rating. As a result, the complex entered service. Now missiles and bombs from its composition are regularly used in the current Special Operation and successfully hit targets.


"Thunder" on tests. Photo by KTRV

However, apparently, they are not used very often. The reason for this may be the novelty of the Grom products, as well as the availability of other means of destruction. The VKS is armed with many other missiles and bombs with high combat characteristics. In a number of situations, they are more convenient and effective.

For example, standard high-explosive aerial bombs with a mounted planning and correction module (UMPK) are widely used. They demonstrate combat qualities no worse than those of the Grom, but are much simpler and cheaper to produce. There is also a whole range of aviation missiles with different combat loads and flight ranges.

However, each type of weapon is designed to solve its own range of tasks. In certain situations, the Grom-1 and Grom-2 products can show the best results and outperform other models. It seems that such situations do not occur often, but they have their own weapons in the form of the new UK RBV.

Extended nomenclature


The Russian defense industry is constantly working on new types of ASP, and this leads to a gradual expansion of the VKS arsenals. One of the latest innovations in this area was the RBV "Grom" UK. Several years ago, it passed all the necessary tests, and since 2023 it has been used in real air strikes.

The Grom project shows that KTRV and its enterprises are capable of proposing and successfully implementing completely new ideas in the field of weapons. Due to fundamentally new developments, new niches are created and filled, and combat aviation gets the opportunity to improve its strike capabilities.
47 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. -2
    5 September 2024 04: 23
    As long as defense industry enterprises operate in Ukraine, all talk about the use of Groms and Molniyas can be considered bragging and throwing dust in the eyes.
    That's it, gentlemen!
    1. +16
      5 September 2024 05: 12
      I remember that even in Germany, under the bombing of thousands of American and English bombers, industry worked until the last days. It is not so easy to bomb it.
      1. +1
        5 September 2024 05: 59
        The industry worked until the last days
        There, all the industry was transferred to the south of Germany and Austria, where bombers began to fly only towards the end of the war.
        1. +8
          5 September 2024 09: 19
          That is, being fully ready for serial production in 2019, they launched production only in 2023? And for a whole year, Su-34 crews dropped bombs like in the Great Patriotic War? This is pure sabotage by Shoigu personally and the entire leadership of the Ministry of Defense. It was not for nothing that the current government repealed this article, under which Shoigu and those responsible for this would have been put up against the wall with confiscation of property.
          1. +3
            5 September 2024 09: 33
            Judging by the text of the article, it is used sparingly (and in fact, in the text of the article there is not a single confirmed case of use except for the dubious one in Kharkov and the fragment found), and not because they were released in small quantities. The author himself believes that there is no need to use them, the problem is solved in other ways. The article also does not address the issue of the advantages of this ammunition over others.
            1. +2
              5 September 2024 10: 01
              Quote from solar
              The article also does not address the issue of the advantages of this

              Why is it not disclosed? The article shows that the main advantage is the modular principle of assembly. When several products are produced by simply connecting standard modules. Which allows increasing production volumes and reducing costs.

              The reasons why these products are still rare are also described - the presence of others with similar characteristics in warehouses or directly in production. And reconfiguring production even for a more promising product, in the conditions of the ongoing war, is not the best idea. Yes
              Although, it is clear that gradually the modular principle will be implemented more and more widely. Since, the economy is also important in war.
          2. 0
            5 September 2024 10: 43
            The friends of the "king" cannot in fact be guilty of anything, and the "king" is even more so a saint.
            In general, as you once wrote, nothing will change with the current military-political leadership, and unfortunately, others will not be allowed in.
            And so the PR departments will work to tell us that "there are no analogues in the world", that everything is great and beautiful in the country request This is cheaper, but on the other hand, stealing by the billions.
      2. -3
        5 September 2024 08: 05
        Quote: keleg
        I remember that even in Germany, under the bombing of thousands of American and British bombers, industry worked until the last days.

        There is no need to lie here. The underground factories were working, and above they were kneading everything that moved.
        1. +4
          5 September 2024 11: 41
          There is no need to lie here. The underground factories were working, and above they were kneading everything that moved.

          What is the lie?
          What difference does it make what kind of factories (underground/aboveground) worked? But they did work. If they were kneading, it means there was something to knead. Or was it just for the hell of it?
          So, whose lie it is still needs to be sorted out.
    2. +3
      5 September 2024 05: 57
      While defense industry enterprises operate in Ukraine
      We need to start with power plants. If there is no electricity, there will not even be any nail production.
      1. +2
        5 September 2024 08: 51
        .We need to start with power plants. If there is no electricity, there will not even be any nail production.

        Power engineer detected)))) Can you tell me which specific power plants need to be bombed to stop the production of Patriots? Or, say, Leopards
        1. +1
          5 September 2024 10: 48
          Power engineer detected)))) Can you tell me which specific power plants need to be bombed to stop the production of Patriots? Or, say, Leopards
          Our blue-winged dove, the pig-faced ones not only fight with imported weapons, but also produce some of their own. They got a pretty good military-industrial complex from the USSR
          1. +1
            5 September 2024 17: 01
            . Our blue-winged dove, the pig-faced ones not only fight with imported weapons, but also produce some of their own. They got a pretty good military-industrial complex from the USSR

            Sure, our astute Dutch strategist. But as we have found out, a significant part of the weapons comes from abroad and in this case, strikes on power plants will not help. And it is pointless to dream about nails. They will bring
            1. +1
              5 September 2024 20: 45
              Quote: Winnie76
              and in this case, attacks on power plants won't help. And it's pointless to dream about nails. They'll bring them

              There is no electricity, trains are not running. Communication centers, dispatch centers, etc. are not working. Automobile transport does not transport much.
        2. +1
          6 September 2024 13: 17
          what's the use of leopards, people at the front need to deliver food, provisions are banal, without electricity, food spoils for millions of people, food rots, try to bake something, if the electricity suddenly disappears, then this is a loss for hundreds of enterprises, sometimes it is easier not to produce anything, than to spoil half-finished products at a loss for casting, for example, or somewhere else ... Of course, for the most urgent needs, diesel generators, but the cost of everything increases incredibly without electricity, the same gasoline diesel will rise in price because of generators and a shortage of fuel, it's high time to demolish all the electrical substations near nuclear reactors! It seems to me that our people are waiting for winter to finally bury them, and without nuclear generation, the blackout in almost all of Ukraine is indefinite, and then whether you like it or not, you can't punch a check, you can't keep the food warm, you can't get it, only firewood and candles, and a bit of scarce fuel ... You can't fight for so long and you can't take out the country ...
    3. +2
      5 September 2024 06: 10
      all talk about using "Thunder" and "Lightning" can be considered bragging

      Then what application can be considered as not such? What does bragging have to do with it in general?
      Demagogy.
      1. -1
        5 September 2024 08: 08
        Quote: Tagan
        Demagogy.

        Demagogy - when instead of regularly striking at the infrastructure of Ukraine (western regions), they try to present single strikes as some kind of apocalypse that would flatten the Ukrainian military-industrial complex on its back.
        1. +2
          5 September 2024 08: 21
          What does the Ukrainian military-industrial complex look like at the moment?
          You are apparently confusing it with someone else's military-industrial complex.
          To understand how much the Ukrainian military-industrial complex has degraded, it is necessary to compare the production capacity, volumes and range of weapons produced by domestic forces before the start of the Second World War and at present.
          1. -1
            5 September 2024 09: 05
            Quote: Tagan
            What does the Ukrainian military-industrial complex look like at the moment?

            Military-industrial complex (of any country) - enterprises engaged in the production of military equipment and weapons.
            1. +1
              5 September 2024 09: 58
              It's like you didn't understand what the question was.))
              Okay, let me rephrase. What is the state of Ukraine's military-industrial complex?
          2. -3
            5 September 2024 09: 36
            It is necessary to compare production capacities, volumes and range of weapons produced by our own forces before the start of the Second World War and at present.

            Judging by the reports from different regions about attacks by Ukrainians, it has grown both in nomenclature and in volume :((
            1. +2
              5 September 2024 10: 02
              Has domestic production increased in Ukraine? In what place?
              The bulk of weapons and ammunition are supplied from outside.
    4. +1
      8 September 2024 16: 07
      You forget that there are Russians there too, even if they are completely spoiled. They can fight and how. As we see from the experience of the SVO, there is persistence and not only they, it was not a fun walk. But the fact that we see a series of accusations and not only that, this is already the result of the new minister. It's a pity that the two were left untouched. I would like to see them there too. After all, they were in charge. All they could do was chat and destroy Wagner. As they say, biathlons and parades were our everything. Only the ordinary soldier pays for this. Drones, as they were a problem, and still are, trench electronic warfare too.
  2. +2
    5 September 2024 04: 51
    "It is worth noting that the Kharkov leadership for some reason mentioned the export version of the guided bomb, which has the letter "E" in its name. This probably indicates the level of its knowledge of Russian weapons."

    And why not? Export versions also need to be tested, their declared characteristics confirmed, and best of all in real combat operations.
  3. +2
    5 September 2024 05: 15
    The short wings are confusing. A new UMPK with longer wings and increased range has just come out, I think the Grom can do the same, increasing the range to 75 and 180 km, respectively. The range of 50-60 km (see data on the ROE website) is a bit short for a gliding bomb, its carrier falls under the SD SAM, even at extreme distances.
    1. +3
      5 September 2024 08: 04
      The range of 50-60 km (see data on the ROE website) is a bit too short for a glide bomb.

      Of course, it is too small. But increasing the bomb's range leads to an increase in its weight, by installing additional boosters and increasing the area of ​​the tail, which leads to an increase in its visibility in both the radar and infrared ranges. Some compromise is needed here...
  4. 0
    5 September 2024 07: 29
    It's interesting. As soon as we have new equipment, it's immediately printed in the media in all its details. It seems that we have no secrecy. This looks like a profiteering, treasonous approach to our weapons. Previously, for such things, they would smear your forehead with green paint. And now, what? The norm?
  5. -2
    5 September 2024 08: 04
    A reasonable question arises about the reliability of the product due to the need for assembly in field conditions...
  6. 0
    5 September 2024 09: 12
    "The Russian defense industry is constantly working on new types of ASP, and this leads to a gradual expansion of the Aerospace Forces' arsenals."
    It is strange that the new weapon is reported in the press in detail, it looks like an advertisement for sale or a kind of copyright claim. Although it was known in ancient times that if a secret gun gets into the army, it ceases to be a secret.
  7. -1
    5 September 2024 09: 29
    Get the fan ready.
    I wrote it then and I will write it now.
    What's modular about this???
    What can you collect here???
    Two options from which nothing third will come out.
    It's not modular. It's just a disassemblable ammo.
    1. +2
      5 September 2024 10: 19
      What's modular about this???

      All
      Two options from which nothing third will come out.

      Firstly, even the possibility of obtaining two qualitatively different ammunition by replacing modules already speaks of modularity. Secondly, this is only at this stage. And modularity allows changing certain qualities of ammunition by introducing new modules. And not by manufacturing a new product.
      1. +1
        5 September 2024 10: 24
        This product is almost 10 years old.
        You can browse the site archive. There was an article about 7 years ago.
        There is nothing modular there. Even the large and small BCs are not interchangeable and exist only in 2 filling options. And they cannot be combined.
        The whole point of modularity is that there is either an additional charge or an engine to increase the range.
        That's all.
        1. 0
          5 September 2024 10: 28
          This product is almost 10 years old.

          Is this supposed to be proof of non-modularity? I thought it was just proof of lack of demand.
          All modularity in that either an additional charge or an engine to increase the range.

          You are amazing. There is "Schrödinger's cat", we can introduce the expression "Harry-lin modularity" - you don't have it, and it is here wassat
          1. 0
            5 September 2024 10: 42
            What demand??? Who offered what???
            Who will need it??? Prefabricated construction implies a high price. And the qualification of the personnel.
            There are no advantages to a prefabricated structure. What is the demand???

            So you want to say that this is modularity????
            Or can't you tell the difference between sarcasm???
            feel
            1. 0
              5 September 2024 10: 59
              What demand??? Who offered what???

              What are you talking about? You lost your train of thought behind the number of question marks.
              Who will need this???

              To anyone who decides he needs it. Isn't it obvious?
              Prefabricated construction implies a high price. And the qualification of the personnel.
              There are no advantages to the prefabricated structure.

              And what special qualifications should the personnel have in order to connect individual modules according to the instructions? Can an academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences handle it? wassat The level of difficulty is like assembling a system unit. Schoolchildren can handle it.
              The prefabricated design, at the very least, simplifies (and reduces the cost of) production; you don’t need a separate line for each product that can be assembled from modules.
              So you want to say that this is modularity????

              I don't want to say it, I'm saying it. Should the fact that you don't understand it (or just like the principle from the old cartoon "Baba Yaga is against") really become my problem?
              1. 0
                5 September 2024 11: 19
                Well on points.
                1. In order to buy, the buyer needs to decide that he needs exactly "this". It needs advantages that Grom simply does not have.
                2. Additional connections make it cheaper? Fastening clamps? Connections??? Make it cheaper?
                A new word in economics.
                And yes. Anyone can handle this. They can twist it with a fingernail. (That was sarcasm)
                3. Most ammunition comes with different warheads. And each variant is assembled on a separate line? Or maybe even at a separate plant?? Don't make me laugh.
                4. So, every ammunition with two warhead versions is already modular???
                Thunder is just some old stuff that no one needed in 10 years.
                250 kg of cast iron with UMPK can do the same thing, only cheaper.
                1. 0
                  5 September 2024 12: 05
                  In order to make a purchase, the buyer must decide that he needs exactly “this”.

                  You decided to retell my 7-word phrase in 11 words? I don't understand why.
                  We need advantages that Grom simply doesn't have.

                  What we are having is an empty conversation. And I don't like that kind of talk. Advantages and disadvantages can only be determined in comparison with something else concrete. Otherwise, it's just that "And Baba Yaga is against it." And to be honest, I don't care. So I won't be that fan you threw at me. Sorry.
                  Additional connections make it cheaper? Fastening clamps? Connections??? Make it cheaper?
                  A new word in economics.

                  Everything you listed is a tiny percentage of the cost of a whole munition with other functional qualities, which you can get by replacing individual modules.
                  And yes. Anyone can handle this. They can twist it with a fingernail. (That was sarcasm)

                  That is, in your reality, you need academicians of the Russian Academy of Sciences for this. Well, okay, I'm not stopping you from living in your reality. And in mine, the JDAM-ER modules are connected to Mark 83, picking their noses, by technicians at bases.
                  Most ammunition comes with different warheads. And is each variant assembled on a separate line? Or maybe even at a separate plant?? Don't make me laugh.

                  Who is this primitive manipulation with the narrowing of the modularity principle to just "different warheads" intended for? Tell me about one line for a guided single-body aerial bomb with an engine and INS+NAV and a single-body aerial bomb with INS+SAL. That's the first thing. And secondly, modularity allows the product to be assembled directly at airbases. Unlike simply prefabricated ones.
                  So, every ammunition with two warhead versions is already modular???

                  No. It will be modular if the BC is a separate module. I think this is obvious.
                  Thunder is just some old stuff that no one needed in 10 years.
                  250 kg of cast iron with UMPK can do the same thing, only cheaper.

                  UMPK is even more old stuff, which has been of no use to anyone since 1999, or 1998, I don't remember exactly. And which, nevertheless, was needed.
                  I don’t understand why you have the same thing, “250 kg of cast iron with UMPK”.
                  And the funniest thing is that “250 kg of cast iron with UMPK” is also a modular design ammunition.
                  1. 0
                    5 September 2024 12: 27
                    Okay. How do you see the use of Thunder in modern realities?
                    Here it is in warehouses. And there is a target for it 70 km from the contact line in Ukraine.
                    How will the use of Grom differ from any other aircraft missile with a similar weight warhead???. What are the advantages of the Grom gast.
                    1. 0
                      5 September 2024 12: 47
                      It seems like you are on Ryabov's payroll, drawing people into the conversation so that the author has more comments on the article. wink
                      Here it is in warehouses. And there is a target for it 70 km from the contact line in Ukraine.
                      How will the use of Grom differ from any other aircraft missile with a similar weight warhead???. What are the advantages of the Grom gast.

                      The difference will appear when there is a target, but already at a distance of 30 km from the safe launch site. You will remove the engine of the Thunder and hit the target. As a result, you have a weapon component for destroying the next target, but at 70 km, is preserved. And for the conditional "any other aircraft missile with a similar warhead in weight" industry needs will manufacture another such component, because before that it was spent on a target of 30 km.
                      P.S. The conversation has moved away from "What's modular here??? What can be assembled here???" and into the far distance.
                      1. 0
                        5 September 2024 13: 30
                        We now have the engine in stock.
                        Dear Sir, This is not modularity.
                        Modularity is when there is a base. Well, like here, a gargoyle with a control unit.
                        And to this base there are several guidance heads.
                        Several different BC with very different characteristics. And today even combined is desirable.
                        Optional "breakthrough" block. There are false targets, electronic warfare, and all that stuff.
                        Several engine options. From a long-lasting one so that it could circle above the target to an accelerator for a couple of seconds of operation so that in the version of a missile-piercing bomb it could go deeper... that's modularity.
                        So that on site, from spare parts, it would be possible to assemble very different products that are optimally suited to the task at hand.
                        And thunder is just a rocket and a bomb that they forgot to assemble at the factory.
                        The difference is huge.
                        And that is why no one has shown any interest in this junk for 10 years.
                        Although it is quite possible to complete it in what I described. We need engineers, not managers.
                      2. 0
                        5 September 2024 13: 51
                        We now have the engine in stock.

                        Which the industry no longer needs to produce for the missile variant, it is already available, isn't it? Saving resources, both material and labor.
                        Modularity is when there is a base. Well, like here, a gargoyle with a control unit.

                        Absolutely right. The base and modules for it. Both are present in the product under discussion. Therefore, I do not understand your stubbornness.
                        And the fact that you want a million modules for all your desires - well, excuse me, you yourself write - "In order for a purchase to be made, the buyer must decide that he needs exactly "this"". The product is modular, which means it is possible to get everything you want in one product. But for a supply to appear, demand must first arise, it is primary. And the developer will try to satisfy all your wishes.
                      3. 0
                        5 September 2024 14: 08
                        Huge savings. A whole engine. But in order for the Grom to be disassemblable, there are so many extra parts that all the savings lose their meaning.
                      4. 0
                        5 September 2024 14: 32
                        Huge savings. Whole engine.

                        Huge or not huge, but savings
                        But in order for the Grom to be disassemblable, there are so many extra parts that all the savings lose their meaning.

                        Useless conversation.
                      5. The comment was deleted.
                      6. 0
                        5 September 2024 17: 40
                        Well, why empty? Truth is born in dispute.
  8. 0
    5 September 2024 19: 53
    In order to hit targets deep in the rear, a range of at least 500 km is required. And in the case of Grom, the maximum range is only 120 km. Somehow this is all depressingly sad. The same American JASSM have a minimum range of 300 km, and modern versions of 1000 km
  9. 0
    5 September 2024 20: 11
    The Americans have such a bomb, it's called GLSDB. It had to be made. And as always, there are no analogues, everything is unique, which they still can't release.
  10. 0
    8 September 2024 14: 07
    If you make the body not just round in cross-section, but in the form of a trapezoid expanding towards the middle of the rocket and narrowing towards the head and tail, similar to how it is done in the Storm Shadow, then you can increase the weight of the payload and at the same time reduce the level of radar visibility