ATGM "Kornet" confirms calculated characteristics

53
ATGM "Kornet" confirms calculated characteristics
Launch of 9M133 missile at enemy target


In service with the Russian armies consists of the 9K135 Kornet anti-tank missile system. Such ATGMs in various designs and with different types of missiles are widely used during the Special Operation to protect Donbass. During their use, they have demonstrated their effectiveness and a wide range of combat capabilities, and also confirmed the declared tactical and technical characteristics.



Technical potential


The 9K135 Kornet was created by the Tula Instrument-making Design Bureau and is one of the latest domestic developments of its class. The development of the original design continues, and the industry regularly introduces new versions of missiles and launchers for them.

Initially, Kornet was developed as a portable ATGM for infantry. In this form, the system included a 9P163M-1 launcher on a tripod and transport and launch containers with 9M133 missiles. The total weight of the system in combat position is 55 kg.

Later, various options for placing the ATGM on self-propelled chassis were proposed. The simplest projects involved mounting a standard launcher on a suitable vehicle. The Kornet-D launcher was also developed with four transport and launch containers and a block of observation and control equipment. It is also compatible with various carriers.

The 9M133 missiles of all modifications have a similar design. They are made in a torpedo-shaped body 1,2 m long and 152 mm in diameter. The head of the missile has rudders that can be unfolded in flight, and the tail has stabilizers of a similar design. The maximum span of the planes is 460 mm. The mass of the missile, depending on the modification, reaches 26-29 kg.


"Kornet" and its combat crew. To increase mobility, the complex is mounted on a truck

All 9M133 variants are equipped with a solid-fuel engine located in the center of the hull. The nozzles are located on the sides of the hull. The engine provides supersonic flight speed. The first missiles of the family had a range of up to 5 km, and in later models this parameter increased to 8-10 km. It can be launched at both ground and air targets.

"Kornet" is equipped with a laser-beam control system. The launcher in semi-automatic mode tracks the target and directs a laser beam at it. The missile tracks its position relative to the beam and automatically flies along it.

The original 9M133 missile carried a tandem cumulative warhead. It was declared capable of penetrating up to 1000 mm of homogeneous armor behind dynamic protection. The 9M113F was equipped with a high-explosive warhead weighing about 7 kg. Later, new warheads for various purposes were developed, including a reinforced high-explosive and volume-detonating one. The latter is comparable in power to a 152-mm artillery shell.

Record range


Depending on the type of missile used, Kornet is capable of hitting targets at a distance of up to 5-10 km. Operators constantly use these capabilities of the complex. In addition, new range records are regularly reported.

For example, in early January, the Ministry of Defense reported setting a range record for both the 9K135 system and all domestic ATGMs. One of the combat crews operating in the Artemovsk area hit a target from a distance of 7,8 km.


Combat duty on the shore of a reservoir

The record-breaking operator with the call sign "Zeus" told the details of this attack. He received intelligence about the presence of a pair of enemy infantry fighting vehicles in the area, which were located at a distance of about 10 km from his position. The operator detected them in time and waited until they approached the missile launch range. Despite the great distance, the missile from the 9M133 family hit the armored vehicle and destroyed it.

This record lasted for several months and was broken at the end of August by an ATGM crew from the Airborne Forces. The paratroopers discovered an electronic warfare station on the right bank of the Dnieper estuary (Mykolaiv region), which was interfering with our drones.

To destroy this target, it was decided to use the Kornet complex, which was located at a distance of 8,15 km from it. The ATGM operator launched it, guided the missile over the water and successfully destroyed the building with the electronic warfare station.

It is quite possible that this record will be broken in the future. The latest modifications of the Kornet missile have a range of up to 10 km, and there is still a reserve of characteristics for new achievements. How, when and under what circumstances a new record will be set will be known later.

Armor-piercing argument


The 9M133 missiles in several modifications are equipped with a tandem cumulative warhead, which is capable of penetrating 1000 mm of armor behind dynamic protection. As practice shows, this is sufficient to defeat typical targets on the modern battlefield.


According to available data, Kornet operators destroyed armored vehicles of almost all types in service with Ukrainian formations. With the help of these ATGMs, they knocked out and destroyed the entire spectrum tanks Soviet model, including models of Ukrainian and foreign modifications.

In addition, the Kornets destroyed a number of main battle tanks produced by NATO countries. These episodes of combat operations are of particular interest, since they demonstrate not only the general potential of modern Russian ATGMs, but also the correctness of the technical solutions used in their development.

The fact is that it was the M1 Abrams or Leopard 2 tanks that were considered the main target for modern and prospective ATGMs over the past decades. The systems were developed taking into account the protection of such objects, and now they are showing that they really meet these requirements.

Interestingly, among the enemy tanks knocked out by Russian missiles, there are models with additional protection. It turned out that dynamic protection blocks, various screens and "visors" can hinder the operation of the ATGM, but do not provide absolute protection from the Kornet.

Wide range of goals


"Kornet" is originally an anti-tank weapon weapons, but it can also successfully hit other targets. For example, thanks to a cumulative warhead designed to penetrate tank armor, this ATGM destroys lighter combat vehicles with a lower level of protection. In addition, 9M133 missiles effectively hit various buildings used by the enemy.

ATGMs are regularly used to defend against attacks from water. The 9M133 family of missiles are capable of attacking light, high-speed watercraft in motion. Since such targets are unprotected, any hit makes the attack successful.


Destruction of enemy boats with landing forces

Domestic ATGMs, including Kornet, can attack some air targets. The crews of the systems often have to work on medium and heavy enemy copters that are conducting reconnaissance or are about to drop ammunition.

Recently, the Ministry of Defense reported another such episode. On one of the front lines, the Kornet operator hit the Baba Yaga UAV with the first missile and prevented the enemy from conducting reconnaissance. It is noteworthy that the launch was carried out at night, but the ATGM worked without errors or problems.

The missile's high flight and speed characteristics, as well as its beam control system, contribute to the effective use of Kornet in air defense. This simplifies target search and tracking, as well as missile guidance. In addition, the air target does not have time to detect the threat and react.

The best in the world


The 9K135 Kornet series ATGMs have excellent tactical, technical, operational and economic characteristics. They can successfully solve a wide range of combat missions related to the destruction of various targets. Based on the combination of positive qualities, Kornet can be considered the best modern ATGM in the world.

The 9K135 systems have been actively used in various conflicts of recent decades, and since 2022 they have been used in full-scale combat operations against a well-trained enemy. During their combat use, the Kornets have confirmed all their calculated characteristics and proved that they can really claim world leadership among their class.
53 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. The comment was deleted.
  2. +6
    5 September 2024 05: 07
    Soviet old men can do it! If they are filed down with a file taking into account modern Russian realities good

    In Wikipedia (God forgive me) in the article about Cornet one of the phrases is: "The Kornet ATGM was used by pro-Russian separatists during the war in Donbass. The 9M133F-1 engine block, the missile control unit, and empty tubes were demonstrated to international experts as evidence of Russia's participation in the war"

    This is a quote, by the way.
    1. +3
      5 September 2024 11: 48
      Now let's "return to reality"! At maximum target distance, the Kornet missile flies at a speed of about 300 m/s for about 30 seconds. The laser beam must be on the target all this time?! The operator must be in the line of sight and cannot leave his place. In addition, time is needed for deployment. The generation 2+ complex is presented as something advanced!
      Moreover, the expression "fire and forget" is sometimes used in an idiotic sense. The tracking machine on a mobile vehicle supposedly holds the beam itself, but the fact that this vehicle cannot move and hide is something that the idiots do not understand. Just as they do not understand that such systems should have long ago been provided with external target designation for UAVs...
      There was a news flash about the development of a remote autonomous installation that can be controlled remotely and... disappeared. It is expensive and has many relatively new components and is difficult to mass produce, but soldiers are born.
      Stop living in a parallel reality and listening to fairy tales...
      1. +5
        5 September 2024 21: 01
        Quote: Vitov
        All this time the laser beam should be on the target?!

        The beam is not on the target but on the missile. And it is usually brought higher than the target so that the radiation sensors do not trigger prematurely.

        Quote: Vitov
        They also don’t understand that such systems should have been provided with external target designation for UAVs for a long time...

        What's the point if the missile is guided by a laser beam? Then it needs to be launched from a UAV or another missile with homing needs to be developed, even if it's optical to a reflected laser beam (like Krasnopol).
        1. +1
          6 September 2024 20: 50
          Here, there is just enough space to cross the 1970st century with the 2.0s. Laser and camera on a drone. ATGM launcher in ambush. Operator with a cup of tea and a cookie at the monitor. Stugna XNUMX, of sorts.
          1. +1
            6 September 2024 21: 49
            Quote: Proctologist
            Laser and camera - on the drone. ATGM launcher - in ambush

            Did you really read what I wrote just above? The Kornet missile does not have laser beam guidance, it is directly controlled by this beam from the launcher. You cannot launch a missile from one place and control it from another, it simply will not see the control signal.
      2. -2
        6 September 2024 00: 28
        So why all this negativity? Look how the Ukrainians bragged about the Javelin and where are they now? Most of the Javelin ATGM operators are lying around like fertilizer, they don't even have time to be buried. And this is despite the fact that they have the same "fire and forget" system (probably their brains). Let me remind you that their guidance is at least like a TV with IR guidance, but they need to track the target for 30 seconds, and only then they fire. However, the firing range does not exceed 2 miles, or 3.2 km. They also need to approach unnoticed, so they are purely defensive in nature.
        If it weren’t for the slow-witted people in the Ministry of Defense, it would have been possible to significantly reduce losses.
        However, the Ukrainian Armed Forces are unlikely to supply Javelins with a range of 8-10 km; they are simply being sold junk.
        Kornet has an advantage in pricing policy, which is also important in mass production. What would you prefer 1000 missiles, albeit with an outdated guidance method, but shoot further than 150 very expensive missiles? Moreover, due to the complexity of manufacturing the sight and labor intensity, it is quite difficult to compensate for the losses. Frankly speaking, the war is already turning into an economic one, who has more resources and opportunities. NATO is clearly losing in this race, although this also costs considerable losses for Russia.
        1. 0
          11 September 2024 13: 44
          Are you serious about the power of the Russian military-industrial complex? Today is not April 1st
      3. +2
        6 September 2024 11: 05
        Quote: Vitov
        Moreover, the expression "fire and forget" is sometimes used in an idiotic sense. The tracking machine on a mobile vehicle supposedly holds the beam itself, but the fact that this vehicle cannot move and hide is something that the idiots do not understand. Just as they do not understand that such systems should have long ago been provided with external target designation for UAVs.


        First of all, you've got it all mixed up. The target tracking machine doesn't guide the missile. It keeps the target in the sight's field of view. You have a screen, and in the center of the screen is the sight's "frame." The target tracking machine is responsible for ensuring that the target you've selected doesn't leave the screen. And keeping the frame on the target is the operator's or the automatic aiming system's job.
        That is why the carrier with the target holding machine can not only move, it can rush like crazy. The Mi-28N can whistle 2-3 kilometers to the side at an angle of up to 120 (if my memory serves me right) degrees from the moment the missile is launched until it hits the target. The operator will not notice this visually, the sight will be clearly looking at the target.


        In the case of Kornet, the laser beam does not hit the target. It hits the missile, which is the information carrier, not the illumination.
        External guidance from a UAV will not play a special role in this case. It is certainly useful, but the concept itself will not allow shooting beyond the horizon. You will not "bend" a laser and will not lead it behind an obstacle. Kornet is a line-of-sight weapon, and in this role it is extremely useful, since at a distance of up to 5-6 km there is a lot of everything that should not show signs of aggression, mobility and life...
        1. +1
          6 September 2024 16: 24
          MI-28? What missile? LMUR? It has a different guidance system. Are you sure you're on the right track?
          Stick a UAV to a 2nd generation ATGM? Maybe it's high time to change the ATGM?
          1. +1
            6 September 2024 16: 59
            Quote: Vitov
            MI-28? What missile? LMUR? It has a different guidance system. Are you sure you're on the right track?

            Read carefully what I write.
            Yes, it is Product-305, and it is for Mi-28.


            Quote: Vitov
            Stick a UAV to a 2nd generation ATGM? Maybe it's high time to change the ATGM?


            What are you talking about? What should we replace the ATGM with? With lard?
            1. 0
              6 September 2024 21: 40
              What kind of guidance system does the 305 have? There is no laser beam. Are you celebrating Friday already or are you delirious? Maybe you can stick the American JAGM here too?
              1. 0
                8 September 2024 11: 47
                Quote: Vitov
                What kind of guidance system does the 305 have? There is no laser beam. Are you celebrating Friday already or are you delirious? Maybe you can stick the American JAGM here too?


                Can you do it without any pressure? Or did you enter ahead of schedule on Friday?
                Where did I write about the laser guidance of the 305th? I don't understand why you're picking on me. I wrote about the 305th in a comment to a post with the following content:

                Modern foreign ATGMs are 5th generation systems that implement the principles "shot and forgot", "capture/interception of a target on a trajectory", "television guidance until the moment of defeat": Spike, Akeron MMP....Our analogue is Product 305 LMUR (made, by the way, according to the FSB specifications, not the Ministry of Defense)


                To be more specific, Spike is not a "fire and forget" but a flying TV camera. And the 305th was not developed according to the FSB's technical requirements, but was completed under development with joint funding from the FSB and the Ministry of Defense, as part of the LMUR program for the FSB.
                1. -1
                  8 September 2024 17: 12
                  Modern foreign ATGMs are 5th generation systems that implement the principles of "fire and forget", "capture/intercept target on trajectory", "television guidance until the moment of destruction": Spike, Akeron MMP.... Our analogue is the Product 305 LMUR (made, by the way, according to the FSB's specifications, not the Ministry of Defense)

                  Where did you write this?
                  In another place and for another visitor? Is everything okay with you?
                  1. 0
                    12 September 2024 13: 37
                    You're not quoting me. Sober up.
      4. -1
        6 September 2024 13: 50
        This is something that morons don't understand. Just as they don't understand that such systems should have been provided with external target designation for UAVs for a long time...

        idiots think that instead of shooting at a clearly visible target, the ATGM crew should sit and wait for a drone to fly up there and illuminate the tank,
        and if there is no drone nearby, then there is no point in shooting
        1. 0
          6 September 2024 16: 27
          No! He, the crew, must drag the installation, turn it around so that they can see the target and vice versa, and pray... until the missile flies and they sit in full view of all the enemies...
  3. -9
    5 September 2024 05: 54
    Domestic ATGMs, including Kornet, can attack some air targets
    They can take high-speed targets at altitudes of up to 9 meters. This is serious.
    1. +6
      5 September 2024 06: 46
      Quote: Dutchman Michel
      Can engage high-speed targets at altitudes of up to 9 meters

      Alas, targets with speeds up to 100 km per hour. And then the automatic tracking system can't cope.
      1. -1
        5 September 2024 09: 45
        Quote: Chifka
        If they are finished with a file taking into account modern Russian realities

        However, modern realities show that FPV drones occupy a similar tactical niche, but at the same time are several times, if not tens of times, cheaper than systems such as Kornet.

        So it is more likely that development will go towards UAVs on optical fiber or with controllers for target recognition without an operator. Since such UAVs are not sensitive to electronic warfare. Yes
        And ATGMs will become one of many interesting, but dead-end types of weapons.
        1. 0
          6 September 2024 00: 38
          I fundamentally disagree with the dead-end development. Imagine a drone that can launch Kornets in flight. At the same time, they have the same capabilities as helicopters, but smaller dimensions. Of course, no one has canceled air defense, but in the future, Kornet can shoot much further than we think. Drones need to fly very close to drop a bomb or grenade, which means that electronic warfare will simply suppress them, operators can miss. The only option is to launch ATGMs from the sky at a distance of 8-10 km, and you don’t need to worry about penetration.
          1. 0
            6 September 2024 09: 28
            Quote from warlord
            Imagine a drone that can launch Kornets in flight

            What is there to imagine, there is already such a thing. They tried to put Fagot on Perun.
            The problem with the range of the Kornet-type ATGM is inherent in the device itself. The missile is controlled from the launcher. And the further they are from each other, the more difficult it is to control. You can't put a camera on the missile, like you can on a drone on a FPV. sad
            By the way, drones that carry other smaller drones already exist. The mother drone also serves as a repeater. And it is several times smaller and orders of magnitude cheaper than drones that carry ATGMs.

            Quote from warlord
            Drones need to fly very close to drop a bomb or grenade, which means that electronic warfare will simply suppress them.

            Not exactly. Firstly, the Kornet's competitor is not a drone-bomber, but a kamikaze FPV drone that carries a cumulative warhead. And secondly, there are already a bunch of tricks against EW suppression, from changing frequencies to passing the final section without control, just along a previously set straight line. But I already pointed out above that drones with fiber-optic control or with AI for target recognition are on the way, which don't give a damn about EW at all. request
            1. The comment was deleted.
      2. +1
        5 September 2024 10: 46
        Unfortunately, the targets have a speed of up to 100 km per hour.
        The specifications say up to 900 km/h
        1. +1
          5 September 2024 21: 07
          Quote: Dutchman Michel
          The specifications say up to 900 km/h

          Maybe, but there is a nuance:
          Maximum target flank speed: 60 km / h
        2. 0
          6 September 2024 05: 09
          The specifications say up to 900 km/h
          Look at the manual... If there is an automatic target tracking system, and it is only on mobile complexes. If it is possible to destroy an aircraft from a portable complex, then only at the airfield.
          1. 0
            6 September 2024 11: 30
            Quote: Timeout
            If it is possible to destroy an aircraft from a portable complex, then only at the airfield.

            What about the helicopter?
            1. +1
              7 September 2024 03: 12
              Quote: abc_alex
              What about the helicopter?

              Transportable, under ideal conditions yes, wearable no.
              1. +1
                8 September 2024 11: 19
                Quote: Timeout
                Quote: abc_alex
                What about the helicopter?

                Transportable, under ideal conditions yes, wearable no.

                Sorry, I didn't read your post carefully:
                you said "... from wearable complex"... Yes, I agree with that.
  4. Des
    0
    5 September 2024 07: 24
    From the author's article on VO: "Since the beginning of August alone, no less than 40 military transport planes carrying cargo for the army of the Kyiv regime have landed at the airport of this Polish city."
    Well, yes, 1-2 flights per day. Not 40 per day. That is, they receive the remaining "90%" of cargo by rail, sea and air.
    1. +3
      5 September 2024 07: 53
      You can't provide for a war with planes. One train will transport everything that these thousand planes will deliver. You can't bring much by sea either. If a country is not capable of supplying itself with weapons, no supplies from abroad will help. Half of them are destroyed in warehouses.
      1. Des
        +2
        5 September 2024 08: 10
        Quote: Victor Sergeev
        One echelon will transport everything that these thousand planes will deliver. You can't bring much by sea either. If a country is not capable of supplying itself with weapons, no supplies from abroad will help. Half of them are destroyed in warehouses.
        For some reason they didn't destroy it. They delivered a lot by sea. The supplies helped.
        It's probably more complicated than that.
        1. +4
          5 September 2024 08: 46
          The Ukrainian Stugna has a remote launch and control point, which allows such a complex to be controlled remotely. The Kornet does not have this.
          1. +3
            5 September 2024 08: 52
            In addition, the Ukrainian complex has a top-down attack mode and a thermal imaging sight.
            1. +6
              5 September 2024 11: 26
              Quote: Monster_Fat
              "Cornet" doesn't have this.

              Kornet has this, it’s called KDU “Kurgan”.
              And there are thermal imaging sights to choose from. For example, 1PN79 "METIS-2".

              An attack from above, given the armor penetration of the Kornet tandem missile, is not required. Yes
              1. +3
                6 September 2024 05: 14
                The KDU "Kurgan" is a "garage" development, not accepted into service, purchased with donations and personal money of fighters.
                An attack from above can be implemented if an elementary computing unit is added to the launcher, which will form a flight trajectory based on the distance to the target.
                The main problem is that the Kornet was not purchased en masse by the Ministry of Defense. It is not available in the OSHS in linear motorized rifle units (unless on the BMP-2M with the Berezhok, but even there there is no remote launcher). Kornets were issued only to special forces.
                1. +1
                  6 September 2024 09: 40
                  Quote: Cympak
                  KDU "Kurgan" - "garage" development

                  And there is basically no huge problem with making a remote control. And why they didn't make it right away and supply it to the troops, like the Kornets themselves - this is the million and first question to the previous leadership of the Ministry of Defense, which, obviously, will remain unanswered. request

                  Quote: Cympak
                  An attack from above can be implemented if you add to the PU

                  You are right - it is possible. But is it necessary? The Kornet already has more than enough armor penetration against most targets, except for a few new tanks, which are not and will not be at the front. And with the help of FPV drones with a cumulative warhead, the task of attacking from above is implemented dozens of times cheaper. And feihua-hua?
            2. +2
              5 September 2024 12: 10
              The Kornet penetrates 1000 mm of homogenous shells, and it doesn’t need to attack the target from above.
          2. The comment was deleted.
  5. +1
    5 September 2024 09: 27
    Advertising from industry?
  6. +2
    5 September 2024 11: 02
    We urgently need mass implementation of remote control panels for ATGM crews to save the lives of crews. Ideally, automated turrets for ATGM: set up, camouflage, take cover.
    1. +1
      5 September 2024 12: 11
      It is necessary that the drone provides the CU, and not bother with external PU.
      1. 0
        6 September 2024 05: 20
        In order for a drone to provide guidance to Kornet, a new missile with a LGSN and a new launcher are needed, i.e. it will be a completely different ATGM.
        But the evolution of FPV drones has raised questions about changing trends in ATGMs.
        1. 0
          6 September 2024 09: 50
          He already has a laser head.
          1. +1
            6 September 2024 11: 18
            The Kornet has a laser beam command control (the so-called "laser path"). If very simplified, then the PU forms a laser grid, the missile has a laser radiation receiver in the tail and reads its deviation from the axis of the laser radiation and tries to reduce the deviation from the axis. In the nose of the Kornet there is an opening for receiving the oncoming air flow, due to which the stabilizer steering machine drives work
          2. +1
            6 September 2024 11: 40
            Quote: Pioneer1984
            He already has a laser head.

            Sorry, it's his ass that's laser, not his head. :)
            The developers of the Kornet are smart people, they understood perfectly well that you can't irradiate a tank with a laser - they'll detect it. That's why the Kornet shines a laser into the missile's rear :) And in the missile's head are the steering wheels and the first charge of the tandem.
  7. 0
    5 September 2024 12: 24
    So, do you need to keep the laser mark on the target all the time? What other guidance options do foreign ATGMs have? At a range of 5-10 km. And why don't we have this?
    1. -1
      6 September 2024 05: 38
      Modern foreign ATGMs are 5th generation systems that implement the principles of "fire and forget", "capture/intercept target on trajectory", "television guidance until the moment of destruction": Spike, Akeron MMP.... Our analogue is the Product 305 LMUR (made, by the way, according to the FSB's specifications, not the Ministry of Defense)
      ATGM "Kornet" is the 2nd generation
      1. -1
        6 September 2024 11: 23
        Quote: Cympak
        "fire and forget" principles

        Well, as soon as the Javelins fired, everyone forgot about them. :) Because, I repeat, you can fire and forget from anything, even from a muzzle-loading copper cannon. The problem is to fire and HIT. And homing systems are a complete mess at this. In ideal conditions of the proving ground, something works, but in a real battle it often turns out "fired and forgot to hit".

        Quote: Cympak
        Spike

        The most famous and widely used versions of Spike are guided like a "flying TV camera" and are aimed by an operator via a fiber-optic cable.

        Quote: Cympak
        Product 305 LMUR (made, by the way, according to the FSB specifications, not the Ministry of Defense)

        Well, not quite :)
        This project was proposed by the developer for arming the Mi-28, in those very shaggy 70s. And the performance characteristics are also from there. Another issue is that it was not possible to fully implement it right away, it was necessary to refine it. And the Ministry of Defense decided that a titmouse is better, especially since the Shturm was promised to be inter-species.
        The story with the FSB was connected with financing, they announced a competition, the developer estimated that we would pass, and offered. They liked the concept. The process began. By the way, the Ministry of Defense did not refuse the project either, they simply agreed to allocate 30 percent of the requested amount, and the FSB financed it completely.
  8. -2
    6 September 2024 00: 11
    The Kornet ATGM has quite good potential. If such a missile is fired from a smoothbore 152 mm gun, the initial velocity is 6 times higher than that of a portable one. I bet that a tank or tank destroyer with such a gun can penetrate any tanks. And this is not even a figure of speech, but in reality it will be so. Penetration can increase from 1000 to 1600 mm of homogeneous armor. True, the recoil and ammunition will have to be reduced to 30 shells or missiles, but the power of these missiles will be higher than that of classic shells, especially the 7 kg high-explosive warhead and thermobaric.
    1. +4
      6 September 2024 05: 28
      You have absolutely no idea how an ATGM is launched from a tank barrel.
      ATGM is a rather "delicate" product to survive the overloads of a conventional charge. Tanks fire missiles with a small propellant charge, and after the missile leaves the barrel, the rocket engine of the missile itself is turned on. Well, the speed does not affect the penetration of a cumulative projectile.
      1. -1
        11 September 2024 13: 55
        Flight speed also has an effect on armor penetration.
  9. 0
    6 September 2024 10: 51
    The first missiles of the family had a flight range of up to 5 km, and in later models this parameter increased to 8-10 km. It is possible to launch both at ground and air targets.
    "Kornet" is equipped with a laser-beam control system. The launcher in semi-automatic mode tracks the target and directs a laser beam at it. The missile tracks its position relative to the beam and automatically flies along it.


    Oh my... I wonder how the Tula people learned to bend a laser beam beyond the horizon? :) :) :)
    When will the journalists understand that any modern ATGM can simply fly much further than 5 km. And 7, and 8, and 10. The limitation is imposed by the range of CONFIDENT operation of the CONTROL SYSTEM. In this case, the control system must look the missile's ass with a laser. And not let go. :) If the missile goes beyond the horizon, the controlled flight will cease. The missile will continue to fly. It may even hit somewhere, but it will no longer be a controlled flight.

    He received intelligence about the presence of a pair of enemy infantry fighting vehicles in the area, which were located at a distance of about 10 km from his position. The operator detected them in time and waited until they approached the missile launch range.


    I love such fairy tales :)
    Translation: the operator was told the azimuth and range of the target. He saw it through binoculars or in the OLS of the complex from 8-9 km, waited for it to get closer, and from 5 km calmly fired the missile where it was supposed to.
  10. 0
    7 September 2024 09: 00
    Quote: abc_alex
    Oh my... I wonder how the Tula people learned to bend a laser beam beyond the horizon? :) :) :)
    When will the journalists understand that any modern ATGM can simply fly much further than 5 km. And 7, and 8, and 10. The limitation is imposed by the range of CONFIDENT operation of the CONTROL SYSTEM. In this case, the control system must look the missile in the ass with a laser. And not let go. :) If the missile goes beyond the horizon, the controlled flight will cease.


    To launch ATGMs, positions on high ground are often used. Even from a small hill, the distance to the horizon can be more than 10 km.
  11. -1
    7 September 2024 09: 13
    Quote: Vitov
    Now let's "get back to reality"! At maximum target distance, the Kornet missile flies at a speed of about 300 m/s for about 30 seconds. The laser beam must be on the target all this time?! The operator must be in the line of sight and cannot leave his place. In addition, time is needed to deploy.


    No. The laser beam is held slightly above the target and only at the very last moment is it aimed at the target.
    The complex fires from a distance at which the tank is unlikely to be hit by a shell. Unlike the "jevelin", which (along with the operator) is within the tank gun's reach. During the entire period of the SVO, only a few "jevelin" crews were able to fire a second shot and not a single case when they were enough for a third.
    The anti-tank system is good because it allows you to hit tanks from a safe distance when the tank cannot respond.
    The time it takes to prepare a Javelin for launch is considerable, a number of operations must be carried out, the sequence of which can be easily disrupted under stressful conditions (proven by practice). The Javelin's homing head easily makes mistakes and often confuses a tank with other objects (also proven by practice). A person, however, makes mistakes less often.
    It is not surprising that Ukrainian soldiers often abandon unused Javelins. Few people want to be suicide bombers.

    The effectiveness of the "Cornet" has been fully proven during combat operations, so it will continue to serve faithfully.
  12. +1
    8 September 2024 23: 24
    Well, probably a good complex.... The guys from Avdeevka laughed that Kornet "has to be earned", but they have Fagots and..... Mestizos