"Soldiers of Fortune" in the service of the United States

59
In foreign media reports, information about the participation of employees of private military companies (PMC - Private Military Companies) in the military operations of NATO countries is becoming increasingly common. If we analyze the military conflicts with the participation of the armed forces of the bloc, it will become clear that the West assigns an increasing role to contract contractors (a modern analogue of the “soldiers of fortune”) when planning foreign military campaigns.

... on the example of "Blackwater".

It cannot be said that the attraction of the “soldier of fortune” is a new thing, because story hirelings has more than one thousand years. For a long time they were considered outlaws and in the eyes of society looked like a rabble, whose incompetence was inferior only to their bloodthirstiness.



In 1997, the top military leadership of the United States made the unanimous decision to actively use private military companies in the coming decades when establishing "democracy" abroad.

In the same year, the largest and most scandalously famous (both in the US and abroad) private military company "Blackwather" was founded, which became the prototype for many negative characters of American cinema and the gaming industry. The company was created by a former US Naval Special Forces (SEAL) officer Eric Prince and an applied shooting trainer Al Clark as a security company that will support and train military and law enforcement operations.

In 2002, Blackwater Security Consulting (BSC) was established, the company's employees participated in the war in Afghanistan.

"Soldiers of Fortune" in the service of the United States


Immediately after the fall of Saddam Hussein’s regime in 2003, "Blackwater" appeared in Iraq as one of the 60 security companies, and began training new Iraqi forces and police, as well as supporting coalition forces.

Formally, being civilians, representatives of a private security firm, as a rule, perform the most “dirty” work. Units of the regular American army cover up and provide for their actions. In the case of illegal actions on the territory of another country, these persons are protected from Iraqi justice and at the same time may be under jurisdiction in the United States. Mercenaries are not part of the American army, so the command is not responsible for their actions.

As for the irrecoverable losses among the "contractants", their exact number is carefully hidden. For example, in Iraq and Afghanistan in official reports of casualties there is practically no mention of killed and wounded mercenaries, since formally they are not regular military personnel. Therefore, the Pentagon and the US administration have the ability to manipulate data in order to hide the true state of affairs in a particular conflict zone and not create the basis for discontent in American society.

Inevitable costs?

Despite all the "visible benefits", the command of the coalition forces in Iraq is increasingly beginning to face a problem of a non-material and financial nature. Many of the "contractants" had weak professional military training, did not observe discipline and accepted rules of conduct, sabotaging the execution of orders of their commanders and superiors, which, in turn, leads to a number of scandals widely commented by many foreign media. But it seems that the US military leadership sees this as the inevitable costs of the introduction of innovations in the conduct of the war.



For example, on September 12, 16, employees of Blackwater, guarding the US State Department’s diplomatic convoy, organized a shootout in the central square of Baghdad, which ended with the death of seventeen and the wound of eighteen Iraqi civilians (among the victims were children). The Iraqi government initiated the Blackwater mercenary withdrawal procedure, but the contract was still renewed. According to the results of the investigations, it turned out that employees of the company from 2007 of the year to 2005 of the year participated in the 2007 shootouts and in 195% of cases they opened fire first.

Blackwater has also been repeatedly suspected of smuggling weapons. A loud scandal involving a security company in March 2010 of the year was an investigation into the disappearance from the American warehouses in Afghanistan of more than 500 Kalashnikov assault rifles and other weapons. In September 2010, five members of the leadership were charged with illegal arms trafficking. Officials falsified documents and thus hid their gift to King Abdullah II of Jordan in the form of 22 weapons, including 17 AK assault rifles captured during the 2008 raid.

Many believe that this is why the company had to change its name several times in 2009 to "Xe Services LLC" and in January 2010 to "Academi". The company's management claims that such changes are not related to the shooting of a demonstration in Baghdad and other scandalous incidents involving company employees, and decisions to change the name and rebranding were made much earlier.

Conclusions are not made?

In December, 2012 of the year in the Pakistani newspaper Ummat reported that Academi plans to expand its presence in Afghanistan after the withdrawal of the international military contingent led by the US in 2014 to protect American interests. The article says that a private military corporation has already spent 22 million dollars for this and will receive additional funding in 2015. It should be noted that the company won on a non-alternative basis a contract for placing contractants in Camp Integrity until May 2015, in the total number of 7 000 fighters.



Thus, private military companies are now becoming an influential force. Contractors are undoubtedly one of the main official tools of the United States to establish "justice and democracy" during armed conflicts. And the killing of civilians is just the "inevitable costs" on the way to the goal.
59 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +28
    3 March 2013 06: 58
    Bandiks are Americanos - they are in any form bandits. They do not fight for the idea, for the homeland, at home. Only for grandmothers, in a foreign territory, and preferably secretly
    1. +7
      3 March 2013 07: 05
      Quote: smel
      on foreign territory, and preferably secretly

      All the secret becomes apparent, but the locals do not care who they wet, for them they are occupants.
      There’s a double-edged sword about what they’ll do when they return to the USA. All they can do in life is kill.
      1. +5
        3 March 2013 08: 16
        All they can do in life is kill.
        Recently, one employee of a sniper rifle was presented to another world. And the same fate awaits these.
      2. +2
        3 March 2013 11: 46
        Quote: Alexander Romanov
        All they can do in life is kill

        Well, the United States will send them to all countries! And how "convenient"! There is no official US army in the country, and "employees of a private company" - well, this is a business, a contract with the locals, private traders are sacred, and in general, "and we have nothing to do with it!" am
        1. +4
          3 March 2013 14: 11
          Quote: Egoza
          Well, the United States will send them to all countries! And how "convenient"! There is no official US army in the country, and "employees of a private company" - well, this is a business, a contract with the locals, private traders are sacred, and in general, "and we have nothing to do with it!"


          Smuggling weapons, drugs, dirty operations, etc. that's what they are for.
          The usual "brigades" of reputable businessmen from global TNCs



          Film by Alexander Sladkov - Mercenaries. Private Military Companies (2011)
          Our companies, in particular Gazprom and Rosneft, which have a lot of infrastructure abroad, also need such PMCs. There is nothing reprehensible if these companies are engaged in their direct business and not serve as a CIA branch.



          Russian Security Systems, ”or SSR, is a private military company founded by former members of the Russian armed forces. They offer escort and security services in different parts of the world. SSR employees argue that their uniqueness lies in a much more cautious approach to their business, reports RT correspondent Tom Barton.

          1. +2
            3 March 2013 16: 59
            But is it not their offspring at their peers' schools that are wet? Well, a worthy change is growing.
          2. Vas_OK
            +1
            3 March 2013 20: 21
            Dear Stanislav, I do not know much about international humanitarian law (IHL), but I know that mercenaries have themselves outlawed. Sorry for the pun. The bottom line is that there is a definition of a combatant, non-combatant. And - a mercenary - a bandit to whom the actions of IHL are not spread. Is not it? For me, a private military company (PMC) is a structure not provided for by IHL, and therefore, in case of armed conflict (war), if PMC employees use weapons, they will immediately qualify as criminals. With the ensuing consequences.
            In the worst case, let PMCs establish themselves as departmental security, and in the best case, let Gazprom entrust their defense to the Russian Armed Forces.
            1. +3
              3 March 2013 21: 12
              International humanitarian law does not explicitly prohibit mercenaries! It defines mercenaries as non-combatants - i.e. the status of prisoners of war does not apply to them. Caught mercenaries are subject to the articles of the Criminal Code of a given country (in Russia this is Article 359 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation). From 4 to 8 man-made ...
  2. Lavrik
    +1
    3 March 2013 07: 10
    Quote: "Formally, being civilians, representatives of a private security company, as a rule, do the most" dirty "work. Units of the regular American army cover and provide for their actions. In case of illegal actions on the territory of another country, these persons are protected from Iraqi justice and at the same time can be not subject to jurisdiction in the US Mercenaries are not part of the US army, so the command is not responsible for their actions. " The American state has settled well: it pays money and someone does the dirtiest work for it. Moreover, the state does not bear any responsibility for their actions.
  3. +10
    3 March 2013 07: 19
    I did not understand what the author wanted to convey to the reader. Just information about "Black Water" or what!? So whoever has not washed her bones already! And the crimes committed by this company are well known all over the world.
    But this does not mean at all that the interests of the Russian oligarchs for a given period of time should be served by regular army units and ordinary conscription guys!
    Let them create their own PMCs. It is inevitable and turning away from such costs of a market economy is simply stupid!
    They put a snout into capitalism, please slurp to the fullest! (For our moralists from the government), and create laws to ensure our guys from such similar structures that protect them and their families socially!
    1. +2
      3 March 2013 09: 27
      Quote: sergo0000
      But this does not mean at all that the interests of the Russian oligarchs for a given period of time should be served by regular army units and ordinary conscription guys!
      Let them create their own PMCs. It is inevitable and turning away from such costs of a market economy is simply stupid!
      They put a snout into capitalism, please slurp to the fullest! (For our moralists from the government), and create laws to ensure our guys from such similar structures that protect them and their families socially!

      The army now, under the plausible pretext of protecting the fatherland, is protecting the oligarchic interests, since the country is ruled by wealthy bourgeoisie. But the Army is still a workers' and peasants' army, and if this thieves' pack is allowed to have PMCs, they will flood their country with blood, without the slightest possibility of protection against this gang. Yes, in principle, there are already emerging security PMCs.
    2. +3
      3 March 2013 09: 29
      By the way, in the first photo, guys from our PMC! wink
      "Anti-terror-eagle" in my opinion. (I could be wrong in the name)
      Now there are enough of them. On an annual basis, American companies provide services for $ 350 billion. Russian for 120 are the same "presidents"!
      The scope of their services is extensive. From the protection of foreign politicians, sheikhs, heads of corporations to mine clearance in the hot spots of the planet! And unlike amers, ours are not protected by almost any laws!
  4. +4
    3 March 2013 07: 29
    This is who to train our "wolfhounds" on. Here and America will not yell that its soldiers are being killed, and ours will test new types of weapons. And then our weapons only go to exhibitions and travel ...
  5. +5
    3 March 2013 07: 42
    Quote: sergo0000
    But this does not mean at all that the interests of the Russian oligarchs for a given period of time should be served by regular army units and ordinary conscription guys!


    + That's right, PMCs are needed! The state should not strain in the event of threats to private companies abroad. The topic is large, controversial, with "blurred edges" of scope, tasks, responsibility, relationships, etc. But, for example, with all the "beauty" of the fight against piracy, the Navy actually protects the private property of shipowners, and how to protect the property of Russian non-state companies abroad, who will guard the convoy with humanitarian aid, etc. - these are general examples, without linking legal issues but these problems have arisen and will continue to grow.
    The state can also fully cooperate with PMCs, especially when unofficially defending their interests abroad - do we really have few retirees, shortened, etc., who believe that only one can best.
  6. +7
    3 March 2013 08: 19
    PMCs, I believe Russia needs Russia also in order to pursue a policy of state interest where the state itself (for some reason) cannot explicitly act
    1. +15
      3 March 2013 11: 29
      Quote: Ragnarek
      in order to pursue a policy of interest of the state where the state itself (for some reason) cannot explicitly act

      There are similar organizations in Russia, and in considerable numbers. They are simply not promoted as "black water", and they work more professionally, without lawlessness, so they are not heard.
      Anecdote in the topic:
      - Iraqi partisan diary:
      Day One: The Yankees arrived, drove us out of the city, captured the port and oil rigs.
      Day Two: We gathered forces, liberated the city and returned the port and towers.
      Day Three: Again, the Yankees arrived, tried with the support of tanks and helicopters to re-capture the city, but the Russians appeared, the security service of some LUKOIL! Swearing obscenities, beating our faces and amers, took away the city, port and towers! As a result, they kicked everyone out!
      Fourth day: Again we fight with amers, only already in the desert ...
      1. +2
        3 March 2013 11: 51
        Quote: AlNikolaich
        They are simply not promoted as "black water", and they work more professionally, without chaos,

        Why unroll them? Whoever needs it knows and can use it in the necessary directions, only PMCs will conclude contracts with the state, and not with the oligarchs (preferably). Do you think state contracts will not survive PMCs? In my opinion - quite.
        1. +5
          3 March 2013 13: 27
          Egoza,
          , only PMCs will conclude contracts with the state, and not with the oligarchs, it is desirable). Do you think state contracts will not survive PMCs? In my opinion - quite.

          That's right! wink If we take into account the fact that the services of such companies in the history of Russia, Ivan IV (Grozny) Vasilyevich also addressed!
          As an example, the team of Yermak! smile
          With the wolves of imperialism in the modern world, it would not be otherwise.
          1. avt
            +4
            3 March 2013 13: 48
            Quote: sergo0000
            As an example, the team of Yermak!

            Yes, Vanya was busy with the Livonian War, and Strogov hired Cossacks for business to restore constitutional order, since Khan Kuchum collecting tribute in Siberia, having heard about Vanya’s failures in the west, refused to transfer to the center and announced Sovereignty. Then Vanya sent archers to Yermak. In general, Cossacks are the first PMCs. laughing True, it sometimes cost a little, just to get a zipun "if not on the Volga where the Orthodox frolicked so much that state plows under the red flag walked so that at least they would not covet the sovereign's property, and in the near abroad, creating, in addition to simple internal banditry, also problems For a long time later, with the Turks, the ambassadorial order was canceled.
        2. +2
          3 March 2013 16: 04
          Quote: Egoza
          Do you think state contracts will not survive PMCs? In my opinion - quite.

          I have an assumption that Russian PMCs are in the majority of special services units! And they work for the state. And the very name of the PMC in this case is "roof"! And very effective. You can justify the presence of special forces somewhere in someone else's territory, by a contract for the protection of "Uncle Tom's hut" of some sort, and do business! And the process is underway, and Russia seems to have nothing to do with it. And the enemies do not enter, with whom they are dealing, whether with the special services, or really with PMCs!
          1. +1
            3 March 2013 20: 43
            Any formations of this kind are under the control of the relevant services and are used by them as needed! It is unrealistic to recruit, train, arm and transport any large unit to the place of work, remaining unnoticed. The notorious Bob Denard says in his interview. that the days of romantic mercenaries are over. "Free shooters" went to the state content. PMCs recruit those who have served in the army special forces - 5 years, police special forces - 6 years.
      2. +6
        3 March 2013 11: 59
        Quote: AlNikolaich
        There are similar organizations in Russia, and in considerable numbers.

        Domestic companies such as Feraks, RSB-Group, Tiger Top Rent Security, Redut-Antiterror, and Antiterror-Orel worked quite successfully (by Russian standards) in the PMC market. They worked in Iraq, Afghanistan, Kurdistan, Sri Lanka and other difficult world regions. ******************** I must say that most of the modern French foreign legion consists of from the Slavs - they all support Russia and Russian PMCs. They help Russians in Africa, not the French. Many are ready and want to work in Russian PMCs. By the way, the USSR Minister of Defense Marshal Malinovsky served in the Legion: in 1916, he fought on the Western Front as part of the expeditionary corps of the Russian Army in France; in September 1917 he took part in the uprising of Russian soldiers in the camp of La Curtin, during which he was wounded; after treatment for 2 months (October-December 1917) he worked in quarries, and then signed a contract for service in the Foreign Legion, where he fought until August 1919 as part of the 1st Moroccan Division.
        1. avt
          +2
          3 March 2013 13: 51
          Quote: Thunderbolt
          The USSR Minister of Defense Marshal Malinovsky served the Legion: in 1916, he fought on the Western Front as part of the expeditionary force of the Russian Army in France;

          Not correct and even inaccurate. Legion is a regular state formation with a specific principle of manning.
          1. +2
            3 March 2013 18: 38
            avt, Among those who fought in the Russian Expeditionary Force as part of the French army were the future Marshal of the Soviet Union Rodion Malinovsky and the poet Nikolai Gumilev. In autumn 1915, a French mission arrived in Petrograd. Senator Paul Dumer, on behalf of his government, proposed sending 400 Russian soldiers to France in exchange for arms supplies. General Mikhail Alekseev, chief of staff of the Supreme Command headquarters, was indignant at the immorality of the proposal. However, it was necessary to make concessions, as weapons were sorely lacking. True, after long negotiations, not 400 thousand people were sent, but almost ten times less.
            In 1916, four special infantry brigades were formed in Moscow and Samara. Later they will be called the Russian Expeditionary Force. The first brigade was to make a world tour. The other three will later go to France via Murmansk - along the seas in which German submarines operated. The creation of a new warhead was approached strictly. Candidates were presented with the following requirements: they must be literate, necessarily Orthodox, have differences in service. On the personal instructions of Nicholas II, a brilliant orchestra for the first brigade was also formed. And it was commanded by Major General Nikolai Lokhvitsky, holder of the Order of St. George IV degree, the brother of the writer Taffy. In April 1916, the Expeditionary Force arrived in Marseille, and from there to the province of Champagne. The war was sluggish. Our soldiers intensified battles, went in bayonet attacks. It was courage that was the hallmark of the Russians. The volunteer Nikolai Gumilev, seconded to the headquarters of the corps, even surprised fellow soldiers that during the battle he got up to the height of the trench parapet, pulled out a cigarette case and smoked. The poet was sure that fate would leave him alive ... Huge casualties caused the indignation and rebellion of the soldiers. In the French units they were brutally crushed by Marshal Petain. And the riot in the 1st Special Russian Brigade was liquidated on its own.
            There were many reasons for the protest. The February Revolution took place in Russia. The king abdicated. Not a single news from home - field mail did not work. They did not want to fight for a foreign country. Refusing to swear allegiance to the Provisional Government, the soldiers demanded that they be sent home. After three months of persuasion, an order was issued to disarm the rebels. The soldiers and non-commissioned officers who had entrenched themselves in the camp, who did not follow the orders, were forced to surrender after three days of shelling. The shameful mission was carried out by General Belyaev. The Russians killed the Russians. The survivors were sent to Algeria for hard labor. Rodion Malinovsky was seriously wounded, and the hospital saved him from hard labor. And in the spring of 1918, Russia withdrew from the war after the signing of the Brest-Litovsk peace. True to the oath, and who refused to accept French citizenship and the shameful, from their point of view, peace, our fighters were in a difficult position. The Russian Legion did not need so many officers. I had to play positions by lot. The rest went to work. The new division of Russian volunteers was included in the Moroccan division of the Foreign Legion of the French army. She was sent to the very heat, where she suffered heavy losses.
            In the spring of 1918, in the battle of Amiens, the enemy was driven back by Russian legionaries. The commander of the rifle company, Captain Lupanov, right on the battlefield, was awarded the Legion of Honor. And when the Germans captured the city of Soissons, 70 kilometers from Paris, the Russian legion again saved the situation: our soldiers launched a bayonet attack. It was then that the French press called the Russian division the Legion of Honor.
            And they returned home in 1920, thanks to the help of the International Red Cross. Http://www.rusempire.ru/forum/topic1045.html
            1. avt
              +3
              3 March 2013 18: 50
              Quote: Thunderbolt
              The Russian Legion did not need so many officers. I had to play positions by lot. The rest went to work. The new division of Russian volunteers was included in the Moroccan division of the Foreign Legion of the French army. She was sent to the very heat, where she suffered heavy losses.

              Well, let's all clarify. Officers and soldiers fought in the Russian corps of the imperial army sent to France by Nikolas. The foreign legion of the French is not a private shop but a completely separate formation in the French army, equipped with a special status and led at ALL levels by cadre officers of the same French army, this full-time unit, unlike PMCs. That's all. It is impossible to compare it with a private, albeit a military company.
              1. +1
                3 March 2013 19: 47
                Well, I don’t argue that mechanical ventilation and PMCs are one thing drinksBut the fact that the future Marshal Malinovsky, like many Russians fought as part of a mechanical ventilation, I think is reliable and incontrovertible. Yes, and PMCs in modern status were not then feel ))) IMHO like that "petty" elite soldiers were sent to a foreign land in exchange for weapons and credits. It doesn't matter what they sold ....
            2. +1
              3 March 2013 18: 50
              In February 1916, together with the Russian expeditionary force, Malinovsky was sent to France as part of the 4th machine gun team of the 2nd Special Infantry Regiment. At the end of June, the regiment was sent to the front at the beginning in the Reims area, then under Suleri and Fort Brimont. In April 1917, in a battle near Fort Rodion Malinovsky, he was seriously wounded by a bursting bullet in his left hand and for a long time he was confined to a hospital bed. He was awarded for courage and heroism.
              After October 1917, the Russian regiments were disarmed, and some of the soldiers were sent to work in a quarry. Others, including Malinovsky, were invited to join the Foreign Legion and continue the struggle with Kaiser Germany. For two more years the troops of the expeditionary force remained in France. Malinowski fought in the Foreign Legion of the 1st Moroccan Division and was awarded the second French award for courage in the battles in Picardy.
              1. Kaa
                +1
                3 March 2013 18: 54
                Quote: Thunderbolt
                At the end of June, the regiment was sent to the front at the beginning in the Reims area, then under Suleri and Fort Brimont.

                “The monument to Russian soldiers who fought on the fields of World War I opened on Saturday at Fort Pompel on the outskirts of French Reims, RIA Novosti reports. and diplomats.
                “We gathered today to commemorate the Russian soldiers who fought defending the Reims, along with the French soldiers,” said Reims Mayor Adelen Azan. “The opening of the monument to Russian soldiers and officers who fought here in Champagne, on the banks of the Marne, will help restore the good memory of the soldiers who gave their lives for their homeland, for Russia and France,” said Russian Ambassador to France Alexander Orlov 08:37 05/09 / 2010 http://maxime-and-co.com/actualites/corps-expeditionnaire-russe/
                1. Kaa
                  +1
                  3 March 2013 18: 56
                  Quote: Kaa
                  Monument to Russian soldiers

                  If not mistaken, this one ..
                  1. +2
                    3 March 2013 19: 27
                    Kaa, and in my photo of the monument to the Russian expeditionary corps at the Saint-Hilaire Le Grand cemetery. On Sainte-Hilaire-le-Grand, mostly REC soldiers who died in the battles in Champagne are buried. In addition, there are those who perished in the Russian Legion. And here are the "UGS" that are doing:
                    On Saturday, February 16, in Paris on Canada Square, where a monument to Russian soldiers and officers who died during the First World War in France was erected, a rally organized by the France-Russia Collective French association was held. The participants expressed their indignation at the incident a week ago. Then, on the night of February 7-8, unknown people painted a bronze monument with the help of an automotive nitro-varnish. On the pedestal was inscribed "Free Pussy Riot". The Russian embassy in Paris sent protest notes to the French Foreign Ministry, to the City Hall of Paris and to the police. During the night, the monument acquired its original form.
                    1. Kaa
                      +2
                      3 March 2013 19: 35
                      Quote: Thunderbolt
                      Thunderbolt

                      "According to the far, far and far away incomplete data (including detailed, but again not complete information of the Russian consulate in Strasbourg in Alsace and Lorraine), there are 318 burials of soldiers of the Russian imperial and Soviet army in France, not counting Saint-Genevieve-des-Bois , Batignolles, Asnier, Passy, ​​Cocade, Menton, etc. And not counting the objects during the war with Napoleon (about 10)
                      of which 74 are from the Second World War ...
                      5 of them with the number of buried more than 1000 ...
                      buried:
                      - 9055 Russian soldiers killed during the First World War ...
                      - 8161 Soviet military personnel and civilians killed during World War II, not counting the concentration camps of Ban San Jean (23000) and Struthof (1600), the British Channel Islands, and excluding HiWi ...
                      found:
                      - 18 monuments, 3 of them are Ukrainian, 1 Georgian;
                      - 24 monuments and memorial signs of "Normandy-Niemen";
                      - 18 obelisks;
                      - 9 plaques;
                      - 1 church and 1 monastery (Murmelon);
                      - 1 memorial tree planted by French children ...
                      - 5 inscriptions on military monuments ... http: //severr.livejournal.com/299925.html
            3. +3
              3 March 2013 20: 24
              Quote: Thunderbolt
              It was courage that was the hallmark of the Russians. The volunteer Nikolai Gumilev, seconded to the headquarters of the corps, even surprised fellow soldiers that during the battle he got up to the height of the trench parapet, pulled out a cigarette case and smoked. The poet was sure that fate would leave him alive ...

              This is not courage, but stupidity. He probably called himself Orthodox, and with the priceless gift of God - life, he treated himself with godless negligence.
              Well, and ended badly.
              1. +1
                3 March 2013 21: 23
                Death is near human breed,
                Zeus dusts up on them,
                Noisy waters collapse from the ledges,
                Water will emerge from the cracks of the earth.
                Death in the midst of a howl, and a whistle, and a moan
                Not a single person will escape
                Also who of strong maple
                In time he will ask the faithful ark. ************ N. Gumilyov
      3. +2
        3 March 2013 12: 42
        they need to bring the legislative framework under their activities so that they can work openly as PMCs, and not as chop
        1. +3
          3 March 2013 12: 58
          Today we are dealing with a completely new foreign policy and foreign economic matrix, which was developed and used very effectively by the United States. One of the main characteristic features at the present stage is that the United States does not participate directly in military strategic actions, but only supports financially and informationally formally independent forces from which they achieve their goals.
          The current situation in the Middle East may later spread to Africa, the North Caucasus, Central Asia and, through fomenting a series of regional conflicts, enter into a global conflict in order to strengthen the collapsing “dollar empire”. And in this regard, the speedy decision of the Russian leadership to legalize the actions of private military companies will only contribute to strengthening the country's security and its prosperity.
  7. +7
    3 March 2013 08: 42
    The authorities of the Russian Federation would study the experience of others and draw the right conclusions. A private military company is a good tool in solving some problems abroad. Protecting the interests of the country, assistance in evacuating citizens, protecting property, ensuring the safety of our specialists and so on.
    And protect soldiers and protect legitimate interests.
    The right thing ... if you approach correctly.
  8. +1
    3 March 2013 08: 56
    Let's retreat a little into the world of computer games ... There is a game like this - "Tom Clancy's HAWX", so it very clearly shows what can happen if PMCs have a big impact.
    With respect.
  9. +3
    3 March 2013 09: 11
    Well, it's like an organization, that's understandable. And how many "Wild Geese" fly around the world? But all nationalities are represented there, and there are more than enough specialists there. And they are fighting not for an idea, but for money, and the operations are also not quite carried out ....., from a moral point of view. It is not for nothing that at one time, the "French legion" spent a lot of time and money on their search and attraction as instructors.
    1. +2
      3 March 2013 09: 30
      Averias,
      Of course, it would not hurt to create PMCs and Russia, there are specialists, But so that they act only abroad.
      1. +3
        3 March 2013 11: 45
        Here I agree with you 100%. We have so many SPECIALS that Mama Do not Cry. In the dashing 90s, how many of them went to the bandits. Of course, it is necessary to form teams from such pros, because in fact they are able to do that - they can only fight (no offense is said). I have a friend, one of these specialists, he’s bored with a civilian, he says - except for fighting, I don’t know how to do anything.
  10. DDR
    +2
    3 March 2013 09: 29
    Attitude to mercenaries is twofold: on the one hand, they fight for money, but on the other; here recently showed the dock. a film about our guys in Serbia. While they were needed they were worn on the hands, and now they are, to put it mildly, ignored.
    Everyone will make a conclusion for himself.
  11. avt
    +1
    3 March 2013 10: 02
    Now add here drug trafficking, which allows you to transfer to self-sufficiency and ask yourself the question: Will amers leave Afghanistan 2014? It will be the same as in Iraq - deep immunity for a "limited" contingent of "advisers" and PMCs with "wild geese" from all over the world. And we will feed them, as the main consumer of Afghan heroin !!!! the war that new Vice President Biden was so happy about! am
  12. +3
    3 March 2013 10: 19
    Surprised! "Thus, private military companies are now becoming an influential force. " - In Russia, this has long been called - OPG - The question is how and by what incentives to transfer them to the North Caucasus ???
    1. 0
      3 March 2013 11: 18
      Quote: taseka
      In Russia, this has long been called - organized crime groups - The question is how and by what incentives to transfer them to the North Caucasus ???

      They do not fight against their own, well, only for good money winked
  13. +2
    3 March 2013 11: 10
    You have to choose! Create PMCs or put them outlawed. Such a "romantic" was caught and immediately spent without a trial or investigation.
  14. +6
    3 March 2013 11: 59
    Mercenaries, Wild Geese ...
    Here, I hope, the vast majority of those who served.
    Oath-taking. Where - ".. until the last drop of blood ..."
    I don’t remember something that there was something about money.
    Rubles there, Tugriks, dollars.
    A military man may be ... a traitor there, a coward, a hunter. But, the basis is the Oath. Idea.
    And these .. geese migratory what is the basis? Grandmas?
    Well, the "shoulder" - in the basis - the same.
    Correct mercenarism is considered akin to banditry. And they are considered - outside the laws, the military. And they were always considered.
    ..
    And because of this, Americans are attracting them more and more.
    Because - themselves - "shoulder" in life.
    Ours ... are not proud of this.
    And Lukoil and Gazprom look at the security structures of all kinds with disapproval.
    The guards - they are the guards.
    1. +3
      3 March 2013 16: 23
      A private company "Forpost" is working in our region, it is engaged in mine clearance. They have no direct relation to the Ministry of Defense, the Ministry of Internal Affairs, the FSB. work for money, employees are individuals! I saw 500 kg myself. aerial bomb
      , which these men neutralized at one of the construction sites. Also a guard? Then more like that.
  15. Alikovo
    +3
    3 March 2013 12: 22
    Russia also needs PMCs, for example, the former military squander their skills, and so on to the country's good.
    1. +2
      3 March 2013 13: 07
      PMCs offer a fairly wide range of services: - examination of the national security and defense system; - a set of recruits for the implementation of international missions and the management of these operations; - protection of strategic facilities (airports, sea harbors, etc.); - protection of oil infrastructure facilities; - protection of energy facilities; - protection of state institutions and embassies and state leaders; - escort of goods, convoys; - training of military units of regular troops; - Translation services specializing in military translation; Other functions, such as mine clearance of fields and objects, as well as the destruction of ammunition; - fire protection; - performance of work on the material and technical supply of troops; - reconnaissance, including air reconnaissance; - protection of ships from pirate attacks. [
      forAlikovo
    2. +1
      4 March 2013 01: 21
      Russia also needs PMCs, for example, the former military squander their skills, and so on to the country's good.
      The worst thing in all these PMCs is that they will pay them money, they will be able to against their country.
  16. +4
    3 March 2013 13: 31
    Let me dream ... For example, Saudi instructors appeared in the Caucasus, all of a sudden, pestilence began at their homeland and with trades, and accident rate suddenly increased. Strange, but only the instructors faded, and others like them, and their order began to recover. And most importantly, no special services of Russia, neither sleep nor spirit. And so with any problems that arise, with representatives of the opposing states.
    1. +2
      3 March 2013 14: 01
      A very good example, very ..
      Bravo, Sergey.
      Although I see work in this normal special services ...
      Geese, damn it, bustards, storks ...
      They are needed - as a factor of distraction.
      To have someone - let them go to the slaughterhouse .... first after the leader.
      ...
      It seems that these structures will continue to grow-and-grow ...
      But they have no prospect.
      Sooner or later, like the same Bob "Wild" - their states will begin to form. And here already - Gusami and does not smell.
      History, Mlyn ... at the next bend.
    2. +2
      3 March 2013 15: 49
      Quote: skeptic
      fishing, suddenly increased accident rate

      By the way, apparently in this direction the work is in full swing! Only many can not comprehend what is happening and relate. Pros work quietly!
  17. +2
    3 March 2013 14: 33
    We constantly forget everything ...
    in the era of rampant computerization, in the era of the global Internet ...
    keeping secrets is very difficult .. and easy .... secrets are usually one-on-one!
    And if .... plans are on the Web - then these are not plans.
    This item is Trade.
    And these ... Wild Geese ... what the hell are they .. geese .... ducks, plucked.
    ...
    Always the policy of the states was conducted by TRUSTED, FAITHFUL people.
    It was.
    It will be so.
    And ... Geese ... are good with .. buckwheat filling.
    1. +3
      3 March 2013 18: 40
      Quote: Igarr
      Geese ... are good with stuffing .. buckwheat.

      With apples and stewed cabbage! fellow
    2. newFeofan
      0
      3 March 2013 20: 52
      Quote: Igarr
      Always the policy of the states was conducted by TRUSTED, FAITHFUL people.

      The history of any state will say the opposite. Coups and revolutions, conspiracies and murders, the undercover squabble of the ruling clans accompany the country from its foundation to its very end, like fleas like a stray dog.
  18. 0
    3 March 2013 15: 14
    Garbage dogs! It's like the English gentlemen with their privateering! The main thing is to shout more about "the purity of the idea"!
  19. 0
    3 March 2013 15: 24
    The idea of ​​PMCs as some kind of punitive structures is inspired by the media and cinema! The vast majority of employees are engaged in logistics services: Security of bases and warehouses, cargo escort, fuel and lubricants service. repair and maintenance of military equipment, as well as household services - feeding and washing (so-called outsourcing). Such a system allows freeing military personnel from the performance of tasks not directly related to combat work. We often have a dual attitude to PMCs: a soldier ordered to protect the interests of the state is a hero, a PMC employee does the same thing on a voluntary basis - a mercenary and a looter. In general, any soldier who has signed a contract, that is, having documented his material and monetary relations with the Ministry of Defense, is already a mercenary, the state Hires him to carry out a certain range of duties.
  20. 0
    3 March 2013 15: 46
    "In the event of illegal actions on the territory of another country, these persons are protected from Iraqi justice and at the same time may not be subject to jurisdiction in the United States." ... in order to be tried, it is necessary to bring charges against a particular person ... question to whom? They do not appear in the army ... and on the territory of the state, with a high degree of probability, they are illegally ... whoever dares to check them, traces of their actions are visible ... only they do not leave witnesses.
  21. +3
    3 March 2013 15: 46
    Quote: Igarr
    Always the policy of the states was conducted by TRUSTED, FAITHFUL people. It was. It will be so.


    Don't lie and don't oversimplify! Yes, it was different, and not so long ago. Tens of thousands of professional military personnel were "thrown away" because of stupidity, betrayal, lack of funds and for other reasons, with the provision of state guarantees - for survival itself.
    Many of them, nothing more than to fight (sorry, to defend the Motherland - which they did not need) did not know how, and did not want to, change the meaning of their lives to the costumes of businessmen, or the robe of a plumber! And in our country, for political reasons, most often the elite units, including the special forces, were "smashed". What is the admission to military schools? How many of those who wanted to serve the Motherland, but serve in the kind of troops that they liked - but no, in our elite educational institutions, they were going to train chaplains, then cooks!
  22. +2
    3 March 2013 19: 26
    Not so amers and fools that these private security companies (and in fact military companies) created. In Russia, as I understand it now, capitalism, the market and why the interests of private OJSCs, CJSC Gazprom, Lukoil, Surgutneftegaz, "TNK & q
    uot; etc. should our guys from the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation defend abroad, and inside their colleagues from the Ministry of Internal Affairs? Let them create their own private military companies, I think this will be more than enough for them to buy, not all the same yachts and sports clubs should be bought. We need an example in this regard take from amerikosov, not hapit them
  23. -3
    4 March 2013 00: 04
    And the Cossacks before the revolutions, too, after all, were they like mercenaries?
  24. fenix57
    +1
    4 March 2013 03: 09
    "Contractors are undoubtedly one of the main official US instruments for establishing" justice and democracy ".."- and in case of failure you can always disown them: we don't know about them, we don't know about them. hi
  25. 0
    4 March 2013 04: 09
    123§23§123§123§13