How the British fleet plundered the Russian North

22
How the British fleet plundered the Russian North
White Sea. Attack on Russian settlement by frigate Miranda and corvette Brisk. August 1854. French lithograph


White Sea Campaign


Having declared the Russian Empire the war In March 1854, England and France, using all possible means to inflict damage on Russia, tried to organize attacks not only on the Black Sea, but also on the Baltic, White Sea and the Pacific Ocean (Heroic defense of Petropavlovsk). In the Baltics there is a strong Anglo-French fleet blockaded the Russian Baltic fleet in Sveaborg and Kronstadt, after which he landed troops that captured the fortress of Bomarsund (They dreamed of Kronstadt, but only took Bomarsund).



The English also undertook an expedition to the White Sea. Already in May 1854, the English sent three ships to blockade the White Sea. Then several more English and French ships were sent there. The squadron was commanded by the English captain Erasmus Omanney (flagship frigate "Efridika"). In total, the Anglo-French squadron numbered about 10 pennants. On June 5 (17), the enemy squadron appeared at the entrance to the White Sea.

The British chose Sosnovets Island as their main base, very conveniently located in the Throat of the White Sea for the blockade of Arkhangelsk and other White Sea ports and the interception of ships passing through this relatively narrow strait. A coal depot was created on the island, which was necessary for the operation of steam ship engines. Already on June 5, the British frigates captured a Kema schooner near the Three Islands, carrying a cargo of flour to Norway, which was sent to England along with the cargo as the first trophy. A few days later, two more merchant ships were intercepted. During July and August, British ships raided the entire White Sea, stopping the merchant ships they encountered and seizing their goods.

On June 22 (July 4), the British reached Mudyug Island, which was located in the Dvina Bay of the White Sea, near the mouth of the Northern Dvina, and sent out several boats to measure the depths. However, they were driven off by fire from two cannons of Ensign Baldin and rifle fire from Lieutenant Tveritinov's boats.


British frigate Eurydice. Artist: William York

Russian forces


In February 1854, the Primorsky District (that is, the entire Russian coast of the White and Barents Seas), and in March the rest of the Arkhangelsk Governorate were placed on martial law. The military governor and chief of the Arkhangelsk port, Vice-Admiral Roman Platonovich Boyle, headed the region's preparation for military action. He concentrated all his efforts on defending the mouth of the Northern Dvina, as well as the approaches to the Novodvinsk fortress and Arkhangelsk. Six coastal artillery batteries were equipped in the delta of the Northern Dvina.

Of the warships in the Arkhangelsk port, there was only the 16-gun brig Novaya Zemlya, which was on guard duty in the Dvina delta. In May, a flotilla of 20 gunboats was urgently put into service, each of which carried 2 guns and a crew of 40 people.

All other settlements on the coast of the White and Barents Seas had to rely on their own detachments, hastily recruited from “willing people” (volunteers), as well as on the units of disabled people that were available in a number of places, to defend themselves from the enemy.


Novodvinsk fortress

Defense of the Solovetsky Monastery


On July 6 (18), 1854, two steamships, Miranda and Brisk (Provorny), attacked the Solovetsky Monastery. The steam frigate Miranda had 15 guns, and Provorny had 14. The British considered the monastery a strong fortress, but still decided to try to take it, as they hoped to seize the treasures that, according to rumors that had reached them, the Russian churches were rich in.

On Solovki, they took into account the possibility of an enemy fleet appearing, so all the monastery valuables had already been taken to Arkhangelsk. According to the Ministry of War, the monastery had the following means of defense:

"20 poods of gunpowder, spears and many halberds and axes from the time of Fyodor Ivanovich."

A battery with two three-pounder guns was built on the shore, and 8 more small guns were placed on the walls and towers. The monastery was defended by soldiers from the invalid detachment.

Beginning with the time of Tsar Peter I, invalids in the Russian Empire were military personnel who had suffered illnesses, wounds or injuries that made them unable to perform military service, and they were assigned to serve in civilian institutions, train recruits or perform guard duty. Even under Peter I, crippled, wounded, decrepit officers, non-commissioned officers, dragoons and privates were sent to monasteries. They were supported by the monasteries.

Anchored, the British ships immediately, without entering into negotiations, opened fire. They destroyed the monastery gates and bombarded the monastic buildings. Fireworks Drushlevsky responded shots from the coastal battery and was able to damage the "Miranda". After that, the British moved away.

On July 7 (19), the British captain Omanney sent a parliamentarian and announced that since “The Solovetsky Monastery assumed the character of a fortress and fired at the English flag", then he demands the unconditional surrender of the garrison with all guns, weapons, flags and military supplies for 6 hours. Otherwise, he threatened the bombardment of the fortress. Archimandrite Alexander replied with a refutation of lies concerning guilt in the shooting of the British flag, as the Russians began to answer only after the third core, fired into the monastery. They refused to surrender.

A new bombardment began, which lasted more than nine hours. On our side, invalids and hunters (volunteers) responded with fire from 10 guns. The English bombs and cannonballs caused some destruction, but less than expected. The bombardment, despite its considerable intensity and duration, did not destroy the entire Solovetsky Monastery, although the roof was pierced by cannonballs and the walls were damaged. There were no human casualties. The power of the English artillery was weakened by the fact that the enemy ships tried to keep their distance so as not to come under return fire. The defenders believed that the English would land troops. Initially, apparently, they had this idea, but the English did not take the risk and retreated on July 8 (20).


The British attack on the Solovetsky Monastery. Drawing from 1868.

Archimandrite Alexander and the entire population of the island demonstrated true heroism by refusing to capitulate to superior enemy forces. The Russian people preferred to fall in an unequal battle, without modern weapons, than to voluntarily allow the enemy onto Russian soil. Tsar Nicholas ordered that the abbot of the Solovetsky Monastery, Archimandrite Alexander, be awarded a diamond pectoral cross on the St. George ribbon; monks Matthew, Barnabas and Nicholas were awarded gold pectoral crosses on the St. George ribbon for the excellent performance of their duties during the English attack.

From the Solovetsky Monastery, the British went to the deserted Zayachy Island, where they destroyed and plundered the wooden church. Then they robbed the village of Lyamitskaya in the Onega Bay. On July 9 (21), the British appeared at Kiy Island, 15 miles from the city of Onega, where they burned the customs office and other government buildings. On the same island, they robbed the Krestny Monastery. The British trophies turned out to be quite modest, since at the beginning of the war, all the most valuable property of the monastery was packed into 7 large chests and sent to the Podporozhsky parish, and less valuable things were buried on the island itself.

On July 10 (22), the British landed a team on the eastern shore of the Onega Bay, near the village of Pushlakhty. There were no Russian troops there, but the peasants (23 people) under the command of two lower ranks and the assistant to the Kholmogory district chief of the Ministry of State Property Volkov resisted. They killed 5 people, wounded several and retreated without losses. In retaliation, the British plundered and burned the village.

Later, Tsar Nicholas rewarded courageous people. Volkov was granted the Order of St. Anna 3 degree, non-officer Basov insignia of the Military Order and 25 rubles, and the usual Ievlev 15 rubles. All peasants received 5 rubles, the most honorable were given the insignia of the Military Order.

On July 20-22, 1854, the British approached Kandalaksha and landed 150 sailors who robbed the settlement. Then the British plundered the villages of Keret and Kovda.


A. Munster. Bombardment of the Solovetsky Monastery by Two English Steamships. Artist: V. Timm

Cola Destruction


On March 2, 1854, the Kola mayor Shishelova sent a report to the Arkhangelsk military governor Boyle. In it, he said that if England wished to send part of its fleet to the northern shores of the Russian state, then

"in this case, the city of Kola may also not escape his attention due to its ease of capture..."

There was no garrison in the city, except for several dozen privates of the invalid detachment, armed with only about 40 serviceable rifles, with a minimum amount of ammunition, and no artillery weapons.

Military Governor Boyle, for his part, wrote to the Kola mayor in March 1854 that

"The inhabitants of Kola are a brave and intelligent people, and therefore I hope that they will not allow the enemy into their city, but will destroy it with shots from the steep banks and from behind the bushes."

And to lead the inhabitants he sent Captain Pushkarev with 100 guns and ammunition. Pushkarev received instructions to use the terrain, which was convenient for defense. An attack on the settlement could only be carried out by rowboats and it was necessary to land on a steep bank.

Pushkarev did not stay in the city for long. He was wounded by some intruder and left. The captain was able to find two guns, one 2-pounder and one 6-pounder, but one of them was out of order, and the other was only able to fire one shot during the battle. A breastwork was also built to shelter the soldiers. The military governor Boyle appointed Lieutenant Brunner as Pushkarev's successor, and he arrived in the city in August.

On August 9 (21), the steam frigate Miranda appeared in sight of Kola. English boats began to measure the depths. On August 10 (22), the English continued to measure the depths and set up buoys. The Russians did not open fire from the gun they had, as they were afraid to waste the shots due to the considerable range. At 8 o'clock in the evening of the same day, the British ship raised the white flag and approached the shore. A boat was sent to the shore from the steamship Miranda. The English demanded the unconditional surrender of the city, fortifications and garrison, threatening to destroy Kola otherwise.

There were no modern fortifications on Kola (the fortifications of the fort were long outdated, and there was virtually no artillery armament), and the entire garrison consisted of a disabled team of 50 people. The adjutant of the Arkhangelsk military governor, naval lieutenant Andrei Martynovich Brunner responded with a decisive refusal. He gathered a disabled team and several hunters (volunteers) from local residents and prepared for defense. All residents of the town expressed their readiness to sacrifice themselves and their property to repel the enemy.

Brunner, expecting the immediate start of the bombardment of the city, withdrew his small forces from the coastal strip under the cover of the steep banks of the Kola and Tuloma rivers. And when dusk fell, the lieutenant called for volunteers to remove the buoys set up by the British and take the fishing vessel they had captured to a new location. Volunteers included the townsman Grigory Nemchinov and the exiles Andrei Mishurov and Vasily Vasilyev. They successfully completed their mission, removing ten buoys.


The screw steam frigate Miranda destroys the town of Kola in Russian Lapland, engraving from 1854. Source: The Illustrated London News, October 7, 1854.

On the morning of August 11 (23), British ships began shelling the city. The bombardment continued until late evening. In addition, the enemy attempted to land troops several times, sending boats with armed men to the shore, but each time a small detachment of invalids and hunters under the command of Lieutenant Brunner stopped these actions. The lower part of the town, consisting of wooden structures, was completely destroyed. About 100 houses burned down, an old fort with 4 towers at the corners, 2 churches, and several shops. The upper part of the city survived. There were no casualties, several people received minor wounds and concussions.

During the bombardment, the masterpiece of Russian wooden architecture burned down. The Resurrection Cathedral, built under the tsars John and Peter Alekseevich in 1684. The cathedral along with the Transfiguration Cathedral in Kizhi was one of the largest many-headed temples of the Russian North. The cathedral had 19 chapters (according to other sources, the chapters were 18, one was removed during the 1834 repair of the year) and, having stood for 170 for years, surprised everyone with its beauty and durability.

On August 12 (24), early in the morning, the bombardment of Kola resumed and continued until 7 a.m. The British tried to set fire to the upper part of Kola, but they failed to do so. After that, the British retreated, never having waited for Kola to surrender and not having decided to land.

Russian Emperor Nikolai, having received a report on the defense of Kola, Lieutenant Brunner noted the Order of St.. Vladimir 4 degree with a bow, captain of the 1 th Archangelgorodsk garrison battalion of Pushkarev - Order of St. Anna 3 degree with a bow, non-commissioned officer Fedotov - a badge of the Military Order. The exiled Mishurov and Vasilyev were transferred to Arkhangelsk for temporary residence.

At the end of August, the English appeared at the city of Onega. At the first alarm, up to 250 townspeople joined the military team, armed with guns, pikes and hooks, ready to defend their city. The enemy did not dare to storm and retreated.

This marked the end of military operations in the North in 1854. In September 1854, British ships left the White Sea.


The western facade of the Resurrection Cathedral in Kola, sketched by A. T. Zhukovsky
22 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +3
    5 September 2024 03: 38
    attempted to organize attacks not only in the Black Sea, but also in the Baltic, White Sea and Pacific Ocean
    Well, the Anglo-Saxons are poking their noses in everywhere!
    1. +3
      5 September 2024 04: 43
      Quote from Uncle Lee
      Well, the Anglo-Saxons are poking their noses in everywhere!

      There is a ton of evidence for this, but WHY, in the end, Russia, having become a power that has the ability to FOREVER get rid of an annoying partner, NEVER shot at some Westminster complex of buildings or destroyed the same production facilities on the territory of Great Britain, or cut off communications at the bottom of the seas washing this snake den?
      Why have we never heard frank questions asked of the British leadership, the answers to which could clarify the situation?
      Maybe it's time to choose a president whose election promises will include the following: put an end to British arrogance once and for all?
      1. +3
        5 September 2024 07: 54
        Why have we never heard frank questions for the British leadership?

        Because such questions should be asked by a truly national government, and not by those who draw red lines, who have already become a pain in the ass, and not by those who make meaningless protests...
    2. +3
      5 September 2024 05: 09
      By 1945, their noses had been shortened considerably without our help. The former arrogance, however, remained.
    3. +1
      5 September 2024 19: 02
      Greetings, Vladimir Vladimirovich! hi
      The Russian North (as well as Transcaucasia, Ukraine, Central Asia, the non-Baltic region and Belarus) is their long-standing dream. And one thing is unclear: before the Revolution and after the Great Patriotic War, our country somehow got along well with them. request why? What good did Russia, the USSR ever see from them?
      1. -5
        5 September 2024 20: 30
        It's all right to ask, but why does Britain need the Russian North, Transcaucasia, Belarus or Ukraine? To accommodate 66 million people (or 21 million in 1854, the vast majority of whom were plebs) in one person per 10 hectares? Before the collapse of the colonial empire, Britain had India, Canada, Australia, half of Africa, Hong Kong, etc. What's there in the Russian North, then and now - a fox and one ice-free port? Russia doesn't really need it, so what Britain are we even talking about? What's there in Transcaucasia, except for Caspian oil - but at the peak of its power, oil was not a factor for the British Empire, and even less so now. What's the point in Belarus or Ukraine - there's nothing there except potatoes and wheat. Mineral resources? So Britain is not particularly distinguished by its production, and any coal is so unnecessary that in Britain itself, even under Thatcher, mines were closed en masse.

        Are these eternal grievances that come from some minor confrontations (in terms of world and time frames) of the Great Game? So look at France - that's where the whole history is bloody wars to the death with Britain and Germany. And nothing, the British don't particularly covet Normandy, and the Germans don't covet Alsace-Lorraine.
        1. +1
          5 September 2024 20: 51
          At the beginning of the 20th century, Halford John Mackinder formulated a theory, the conclusions of which can be briefly formulated as follows:
          Who owns the heartland owns the world
          What is interesting is that the English followed this theory, it turns out, even before it was clearly formulated.
          1. 0
            6 September 2024 00: 17
            This is a marginalized theory from the beginning of the 20th century, since then Britain has long since stopped laying claim to world dominion - it would like to hold on to Northern Ireland and Scotland, and we still have phantom pains about the all-powerful "Anglo-Saxons"...
            1. +2
              6 September 2024 00: 27
              Quote: Vladimir_Semenovich
              Since then, Britain has long since stopped laying claim to world dominion

              I suggest you familiarize yourself with the list of countries in which the British king is the head of state.
              1. -2
                6 September 2024 00: 45
                In order to do what? Let's take the two largest countries - Canada and Australia. Do they pay any tribute or taxes to Britain? Do citizens of these countries serve in the British army or are there any joint patrols, military pacts? Maybe the mother country exports all the resources and in return sends criminals to serve their sentences in the Yukon? Do citizens of these countries need work visas to work in the UK or vice versa? Does the British crown have any leverage, apart from respect for traditions?

                I'll ask a simpler question: does the king have limits to his power in Britain itself? For example, if an open communist or fascist wins the election, can the king refuse to approve such a politician as prime minister?
    4. -1
      5 September 2024 20: 12
      There was a war, Britain could project power with its navy, why not do it?
  2. -1
    5 September 2024 05: 58
    This did not end British activity in the North.

    In 1918-1919, a concentration camp for captured Red Army soldiers and sympathizers of the Soviet power was created in the Solovetsky Monastery. Our contemporaries were buzzing about the SLON camp, but who initially organized the camp there and what the White Guard government of Tchaikovsky did is almost unknown to anyone today.
    1. -1
      5 September 2024 11: 27
      Tchaikovsky, by the way, was a fairly well-known populist.
    2. +3
      5 September 2024 19: 35
      Even before this, on the island of Mudyug at the mouth of the White Sea, the British (allies?) had organized a concentration camp for completely white soldiers and officers who had spoken out against the intervention.
      By the way, I will clarify the picture of why they did not attack the capital of the North - Arkhangelsk. The whole point is that the mouth of the Northern Dvina, through which one must pass in order to get from the White Sea to the city, is extremely difficult and dangerous in terms of branches and shoals, which can also change over time. Therefore, the Swedes at one time were forced to trust the helmsman Ryabov, and in this story the ensign and lieutenant disrupted the work on measuring the depths by firing at the boats.
      So, in the end, the biggest target in the sea area was Solovki, which the English bombarded, and several coastal villages and monasteries.
  3. +1
    5 September 2024 06: 27
    I recommend the author read about how British ships shelled villages in the Arkhangelsk region during the Civil War, and not just in the 19th century.
  4. +3
    5 September 2024 07: 57
    attempted to organize attacks not only in the Black Sea, but also in the Baltic, White Sea and Pacific Ocean

    This is perhaps the first case in the history of the organization of simultaneous military actions on such a comprehensive scale and at such large distances between objects - up to 8 thousand km.
    Atlantic, Arctic, Pacific oceans...

    The purpose of the English expedition to the White Sea with such a small force is not entirely clear - to stop trade, to plunder, to indicate the seriousness and scale of the war? Perhaps there were simply no resources for more...
  5. +2
    5 September 2024 08: 44
    I thought that this Poklonnaya cross was irretrievably lost in the 1980s. Murmansk residents had a tradition of coming to this cross and standing near it, touching it. It stood opposite the thermal power plant of the Kola settlement under the roof in the gazebo on the right side of the road leading across the Tuloma River to Finland and Norway. It has survived everything over these centuries. good
  6. +2
    5 September 2024 11: 31
    Note the use of the word "hunter" as a synonym for "volunteer". Collaborators who collaborated with the Nazis fabricated orders and decrees issued by alleged representatives of the Soviet political and military leadership to discredit them, and the word "hunter" was very often used in this sense. Obviously, the White émigrés did not know that volunteers were not called that in the USSR.
    1. 0
      5 September 2024 20: 37
      Hunter - in the Russian Imperial Army, the name of a lower rank who was not taken into service in the next recruitment or was not subject to recruitment (and after the introduction of universal military service in 1874 - did not draw the draft lot) and entered service voluntarily (volunteer), also a serviceman who voluntarily (of his own free will) volunteered to carry out some risky task.
  7. +3
    5 September 2024 17: 28
    As soon as the British have to fight themselves - immediately "bang" and the balloon deflates. Only by other people's hands and with overwhelming superiority. The US Armed Forces fight in exactly the same way. From one weed on planet Earth grow...
  8. +5
    5 September 2024 17: 31
    Dear author! You forgot to mention the sailing schooner "Polar Star", laid down on September 01 (13), 1843 in the Arkhangelsk Admiralty. Length: 76 feet 9 inches, width with planking: 8 feet 3 inches. The schooner was engaged in servicing the White Sea lighthouses from 1844 to 1858. In 1854, the "Polar Star" was armed with 6 guns. By order of R.P. Boyle, the schooner managed to remove the keeper and the entire crew, along with lighting equipment, from the Zhizhginsky lighthouse and deliver people and property to the port of Arkhangelsk safe and sound. In 1859, due to dilapidation, the schooner was written off.
    And in June 1860, a sail-and-screw schooner of the same name was laid down in the Arkhangelsk Admiralty. The captains on it were the children of Roman Platonovich Boyle, who died in December 1854: Alexander Romanovich (1880-85) and Georgy Romanovich (1886-87). In 1881, Alexander Romanovich Boyle, on the "Polar Star", armed with 2 guns, conducted a joint cruise with the schooner "Bakan" off the Murmansk coast to protect Russian industrialists from "violent actions of foreigners". It was this ship, excluded from the fleet lists in 1888 in Kronstadt, that became the last ship built in the Arkhangelsk Admiralty.
  9. +1
    5 September 2024 18: 54
    A coal storage facility was created on the island, which was necessary for the operation of steam ship engines.

    Somehow it was created quickly. Either it was already there, or the Norgs got busy (or maybe our merchants). Well, they weren't dragging a supply caravan with them, were they?