Indian fifth-generation fighter: it won’t take off without Russia

63 493 139
Indian fifth-generation fighter: it won’t take off without Russia


So, let's talk about the fighter first, and then about Russia. As for the fighter, everything is simple: after some debate, the relevant committee of the Cabinet of Ministers of India approved the continuation of work on the creation of the fifth-generation Indian fighter AMCA (Advanced Medium Combat Aircraft), which should in the future become the air support of the Indian Air Force and Navy.



According to plans, it will be a single-seat, twin-engine, all-weather multi-role combat aircraft.

The Cabinet of Ministers confirmed the seriousness of its intentions by allocating 150 trillion rupees. This, by the way, is 1,8 billion dollars, very serious money. And it is planned to spend them on a set of works on the full-scale design, development, construction and flight testing of the AMCA aircraft and its subsequent certification.

The build and testing are five prototypes, AMSA project director Krishna Rajendra said. According to the agency's plans aviation development of India, the first flight of the fighter should take place somewhere around 2028. Serial production is planned to begin in 2035, and in total the Indian Air Force would like to have 7-8 squadrons of such aircraft, and considering that the Air Force operates 30 squadrons, the percentage of new generation aircraft is quite high.

However, not everyone in India shares the optimism regarding 2035. Aviation experts like the well-known Sanjeev Kumar believe that if the new aircraft goes into production, it will not be before 2040, or even later.

Why? Well, the answer is clear and his name is “Tejas”.



In case anyone has forgotten, the development of this miracle aircraft, which was supposed to replace our MiG-21, began in 1983. The project was completed by 1990, and Tejas made its first flight in 2001. That is, nothing at all, after 18 years. And after the same amount of time (19, to be precise), the Air Force accepted the first combat aircraft into its ranks. 2020 And Tejas are being produced in droves (about 20 units have already been delivered), which makes one think that 37 years is not that long.

But it’s not on credit, as they say.

Of course, no one is talking about any full-fledged replacement of the “blinking light” with this sparrow, but nevertheless: the Indians have experience in producing their own aircraft. But there are also nuances: only an inveterate Indian patriot can call “Tejas” Indian.

The engine is American, General Electric F-404-GE-IN20, but the Indians never brought their own, domestic Kaveri, to fruition. Internal equipment of the American company Martin Marietta, which is now part of the Lockheed Martin corporation. Armament of Russian companies GMKB “Vympel”, Research Institute of Instrument Engineering, “Instrument Engineering Design Bureau” and so on. Indian, frankly, is not enough.

Not everything is smooth sailing with the new AMCA project either: the first two squadrons are planned to be equipped with Mk-1 version aircraft equipped with General Electric F414 engines with a thrust of 10 kgf.

And the next five squadrons, according to the plan, will receive the AMCA Mk-2 aircraft with more powerful engines, a thrust of 11 kgf, controlled thrust vectoring and the possibility of supersonic flight in cruising engine mode. The new engine will be developed jointly with a foreign partner.

And this is where the time of doubt begins. Why? Because Tejas. Because "Kaveri". Because the Indians were never able to create their own engine.

This means that someone will have to make such an engine for India and give it to the Indians, because they will not buy it on principle. “Make in India” is a good motto, but the implementation leaves much to be desired.

And, frankly speaking, there will be no line of people willing to supply India with an engine for a new aircraft after the terrible failure of the Indian MMRCA super competition.

Meanwhile, India needs AMSA. Here we need to look at the countries with which India will have any friction, and the main one here is China. Many Indian experts say that today China is significantly ahead of India in terms of aviation, and the new aircraft should correct the situation.

Another question is what will China wait for? And won’t it release a radically modified J-20 exactly by 2040, or some hypothetical J-40?

Sanjeev Kumar: "The aircraft are required as of yesterday, given the woefully low number of squadrons with fourth generation aircraft and below, as well as the looming threat of growing Chinese aggression"

Well, let’s say, Mr. Kumar gave too much away about the “growing Chinese aggression”, so there were, are, and most likely will be frictions between India and China, but for some reason, there is no open aggression on the part of the PRC. In reality, China has enough headaches with the truly aggressive United States and its pack of allies, so India will definitely not soon rise to at least the top 10 Chinese problems.

But here is the state of the Chinese army and fleet - this is what will dragon the Indians until they can at least equal China in capabilities. And here, completely Chinese developments have had and will have an advantage over Indian purchased and localized weapons developments.

Here we need to understand such a thing as “design school”. This is a very difficult path, roughly speaking, from a plywood biplane to a strategic bomber. There are design schools in the USA, Britain, Germany, and Italy. In countries that have been building airplanes for over a hundred years. Russia also has its own and very unique KS, and it is unlikely that anyone in the world would dare to challenge this. Soviet and Russian aircraft are a separate chapter in stories world aviation and the chapter is bright and interesting.

It’s worth looking back here, and you can see that Russian aircraft designers Sikorsky, Lebedev, Gakkel, Grigorovich, Tupolev and Polikarpov did not engage in stupid reverse engineering, stupidly copying Nieuwports, Sopwiches and Fokkers, they built their own models, tested them , worked on improvements.


Yes, the aircraft industry of the Russian Empire was very undeveloped, there were no engines, there was not a lot of things, but already by the 30s, Soviet aircraft began to fly en masse using their own engines, even if they were created on the basis of imported ones. And what started after the war...

In this regard, the Chinese are great guys. Having bought the Su-27 from us, they played it safe and eventually successfully copied it, and then moved on. And they actually achieved a “five-year plan in three years,” because no one would dare call their J-20 a copy or variation of the Sukhoi Design Bureau aircraft. In the meantime, the Chinese were fighting for their “Black Eagle”, using developments on all the aircraft they could get their hands on, from the MiG 1.44 to the F-35, the peace of the sky was guarded by the Su-30MKK and Su-35 wisely purchased from Russia. But now the number of J-20s cannot be compared with the number of purchased Russian aircraft!


What did they do in India? And there they simply mastered the assembly of Russian Su-30MKI.

What's wrong with assembling imported aircraft and localizing their production on your own territory?


Nothing. But good is also not enough. An example couldn’t be simpler: how many car factories have foreigners opened in Russia before 2022? And how many are working now? Blind assembly does not give anything to the design school; in general, it only gives finished products.

A factory worker makes parts. The collector collects them into nodes. The installer installs the units in place. And so on. Not a single person at the factory that supposedly produces the aircraft can answer the question of why this unit is the way it is and how it can be improved. It was invented by completely different people.

No, the Indians are great, they are trying to install their radars, they are trying to replace Russian avionics elements with Israeli ones... But you understand, this is local. It is possible to install another radar, from another manufacturer, that is true. But along with it, it will be necessary to change the interface units with the guided weapons systems. And it is not a fact that, for example, Russian missiles will perfectly understand what the Israeli radar transmits to them.

This is how the Indians learned to assemble the T-90. But “Arjun” has so far remained an armored weakness, and it is unlikely that “Arjun-2” will be able to correct the mistakes of the first.


Indian engineers were able to install German diesel (imported again!) and Russian Kontakt-5 into their own box, but were unable to create a more or less acceptable suspension. They just don't know how. That’s why it turned out to be almost its own, but infirm. Which, we note, has been developed for 37 years.

37 is an unlucky number for Indian designers. Tank, airplane…

Let's return, by the way, to airplanes. What the Indians achieved in terms of the Tejas cannot be compared with the MiG-21, which had to be replaced. Jay versus crow.

And so, in the wake of such success as the Tejas, the Indians launched a second program to create “their own” fighter, aiming at the fifth generation. As for the timing, it is worth remembering that the development of Tejas lasted 37 years. Plus there was also a failure with the domestic Kaveri aircraft engine. So in reality, the timing of AMSA can shift to the right no worse than it did in the stories of “Arjun” and “Tejas”.



But everything could have been completely different


Remember how in 2007 India joined the Russian program to create the fifth generation fighter FGFA (Fifth Generation Fighter Aircraft)? Its goal was to create a multi-role fighter based on the Russian PAK FA, which was being developed at that time. But genetic greed and the desire to bargain for more for themselves failed the Indians this time. And after successes with the T-90, BrahMos, Su-30MKI, India left the project and got a big bang. And Russia has implemented a project that now flies and fights like the Su-57. Yes, in small quantities for now, but here it is - for now.

That is, at the level of the start of its AMSA program, India could already have its fifth-generation fighter, not just “in the metal”, but on the runways of airfields, and who the hell is not joking - in the future, in factories. And there it would be possible to bargain, fortunately, there are no sanctions in India.

In general, of course, trading with India is like having an amorous affair with a tigress: both dangerous and below average pleasure. The eternal Indian dances to the point of exhaustion in the style of “Ay-lai-lai, the plane crashed, the tank doesn’t move, the machine gun doesn’t fire, you should have bought it in Europe, but it’s more expensive, but you can use it”—it’s actually starting to get boring. The Indian press constantly raised such a howl and groan before each tender that an inexperienced reader could seriously think that everything was so bad.

Well, of course, their MiG-21s are falling... Well, yes, they are falling. Half of them were beaten, they were incompetent during the entire operation. But here’s the funny thing: for some reason, MiGs assembled in India fought in emergency situations! What was produced in the USSR flew like clockwork.

But these are the terms of the game: dancing with groans every time, breaking the hands of the seller, revising the financing of projects, revising the terms of contracts. The execution freezes completely, then the Indian military arrives and begins to resolve the situation. And they often resolve it, but the question is - at what cost? Discounts, deferments, special prices...

Well, here’s the result: like in that poem about “And in our apartment... Su-57, and in yours? "Tejas"?


But in general, in fairness, I note that such dances are Indian buyers weapons suits absolutely everyone without exception. Well, this is their tradition at the genetic level - to dance to death and then calmly rob.

And it didn’t work out with Russia, so much so that it’s time to bite your elbows, because the Su-57 turned out to be a very good plane. But all the accusations against the FGFA project somehow didn’t play out, and in the end, Russia has the plane, but India does not. And China has it. However, an opinion has already been expressed in this direction here: Su-57 - fifth generation disco dancer? And so far nothing has changed.

But the engine...


Hope that the good Americans will provide the engine and allow it to be localized and produced (they gave it, they allowed it)? Yes, but excuse me, for Tejas-2 and the first two AMCA series it will be the General Electric F404-GE-F2J3, and its ancestor, the General Electric F404-GE-F1D2 was still on the F-117! And the first F404 in general F/A-18 of the first series were lifted into the air...

In general, this is not an engine for a fifth generation aircraft. Yes, things aren’t going very well for us with the AL-41F1, so this is where the crux of the matter lies: if we have problems, what should we talk about there, on the other side of the Indian border? We will resolve the issues with the engine sooner or later; here, as they say, the school decides.

But the engine is just an engine. In the case of Arjuna, even German diesel did not save. An aircraft engine requires many more systems and equipment, properly installed and debugged.

So all these millions of dollars look, of course, serious, but the possibilities of their implementation are not very good. Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL), which is the manufacturer, seems to have already started production activities that will result in AMCA.

But will it be...

The Indian media themselves say that the aircraft of the first and second series will be different. Yes, in fact, it will be the same airframe, capable of storing 6500 kg of fuel, 1500 kg of weapons in the fuselage compartment and 5500 kg (goodbye, stealth!) on the external sling.

It turns out that the AMSA Mk.1 will fly with a General Electric F414 engine, and the Mk.2 with a more powerful engine, which is only planned to be developed jointly with the French company Safran, which was previously called Snecma.

No, there is no doubt that these Frenchmen know how to work with engines. After all, Safran, formerly Snecma, even earlier this company absorbed such famous manufacturers as Gnome&Rhône, Turbomeca and Microturbo.

The only question is, to what extent will the Safran engine be identical in weight, dimensions and dimensions to the American product from General Electric? And to what extent will it be possible to replace one engine with another? History, you know, knows many cases when they wanted one thing, but it turned out somewhat different.

So the dance begins


It’s hard to say how long it will last, but 150 trillion Indian rupees will run out sooner or later. Well, or 1,8 billion US dollars, whichever is more interesting to you. And obviously this will happen faster than 37 years will pass, as was the case in previous projects.

In general, there is a quiet suspicion that the Indians will gnaw at themselves more than once, and not just their elbows, for refusing to participate in the fighter project with Russia. Now they are at least twenty years behind, and how the Indian military sees itself overcoming such a gap, which, moreover, can grow up to 30 years.

Of course, the Chinese military will be such gentlemen that they will wait for their neighbors to finish their next generation aircraft. True, they, the Chinese, are already deploying their “Black Eagles” in Tibet, right near the Indian border, but this means absolutely nothing, doesn’t it, Mr. Vivek Ram Chaudhary, Commander-in-Chief of the Indian Air Force?

After all, a dance can go on forever, even a dance around an airplane. And, as the Indian experience shows, the result is not always important. But in cooperation with Russia there would be a result similar to the Su-30MKI or BrahMos. And now the prospect is more like Tejas 2 or Arjun 2.

By the way, it’s completely natural.
139 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +1
    20 August 2024 05: 10
    Something tells me that the Indians, having seen enough of us, realized that they cannot depend on anyone’s engines.
    1. +13
      20 August 2024 07: 30
      Quote: Spare
      Something tells me that the Indians, having seen enough of us, realized that they cannot depend on anyone’s engines.

      There are no miracles. In order not to depend on foreign engines, you need to persistently develop your science, engine building and design and related industries for thirty years. Even the Chinese are not doing well with their engines. What can I say, although everything is moving along with this, it is very tense. I think Indians still need to work and work in these areas. And literally tomorrow they will do nothing. Therefore, you will have to take someone else’s on a competitive basis.
      1. 0
        20 August 2024 08: 48
        Today China is significantly ahead of India in terms of aviation, and the new plane should just correct the situation.
        There is a deadlock here, the answer must be asymmetrical... Only the destruction of Chinese aviation along with the aviation industry can bring India closer to China in terms of aviation... and I somehow doubt it a little. wink laughing
        1. +5
          20 August 2024 10: 38
          Kolya! hi
          This is all a sham, in a terrible secret the Indians are making the sixth generation, and the Chinese are screwed
    2. -2
      20 August 2024 13: 30
      Can. If the supplier country is a reliable partner. Russia is just such a partner, it is not afraid of anyone and can do a lot. Well, with the striped ones, yes, it’s dangerous here, the genes are like that, sorry. If I didn’t like it, they immediately grabbed the Colt and fired.
      1. +1
        25 August 2024 13: 51
        Is Russia a reliable partner? For India? What if Comrade Xi asks to refuse Comrade Modi?
      2. 0
        27 August 2024 12: 36
        Are you sure?
        The Indians left the project because Russia was not going to transfer any technology to them at all.
        Maximum - the same assembly line as on the Su-30.
        And that's exactly why they came out.
        And Skomorokhov created the article by deceiving readers.
        What India supposedly lost without us.
        He himself came up with, drafted the text, and accused the Indians of something that they would not have had without us and would not have had with us.
        Technologies.
    3. -2
      20 August 2024 14: 25
      Look here or don't look... we need a fighter. Can India make turbojet engines? No!..
      The correct and successful path is the Chinese one with the Su30MK and the J-10.
      They bought a license (the Indians also went through this stage), mastered production, bought the Al31 and are developing their own analogues.....This is the path to success and China has its own fighter production. The Indians have an advantage - they have access to both our technologies and Western ones. But they have no brains.
    4. 0
      20 August 2024 18: 50
      I don’t know what this nonsense tells you, but neither the Indians nor anyone else will be able to organize the production of engines without the participation of Russia, since neither the EU nor the USA will ever provide technology.
      1. 0
        25 August 2024 13: 53
        Why? The French will build a factory, for example.
      2. 0
        27 August 2024 12: 52
        So Russia, too, has not given any technology and will not give it.
        That is why India withdrew from the project.
    5. +1
      21 August 2024 17: 10
      What do engines have to do with it? The Indians refused cooperation on the PAK FA/Su-57 because they were not satisfied with his EPR. They didn't even demand back the approximately 280 million dollars they had invested in advances into the R&D of this project. The Su-57 has a frontal EPR similar to the Rafale (without the suspension), of which they had bought a whole bunch from France.
      https://meta-defense.fr/ru/2024/07/04/dassault-aviation-site-mco-rafale-inde/#:~:text=Rafale%20%D0%BF%D1%80%D0%B5%D0%B4%D0%BD%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%BD%D0%B0%D1%87%D0%B0%D0%BB%D1%81%D1%8F%20%D0%B4%D0%BB%D1%8F%20%D0%92%D0%92%D0%A1%20%D0%98%D0%BD%D0%B4%D0%B8%D0%B8,%D1%83%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B5%D0%BD%D1%8C%20%D0%BA%D0%B0%D1%87%D0%B5%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B2%D0%B0%2C%20%D1%82%D1%80%D0%B5%D0%B1%D1%83%D0%B5%D0%BC%D1%8B%D0%B9%20%D0%B8%D0%BD%D0%B4%D0%B8%D0%B9%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%B8%D0%BC%D0%B8%20%D0%B0%D1%80%D0%BC%D0%B8%D1%8F%D0%BC%D0%B8.
      1. 0
        23 August 2024 08: 51
        They were not satisfied with the Su-57 EPR? Let them look for available projects with the necessary EPR. It's like in the saying: it's supposed to be there!
        1. +1
          23 August 2024 09: 00
          - They found the Rafale. Which has a frontal ESR (no pendants!) about 0.2-0.3 m²
          https://overclockers.ru/blog/amv212/show/101228/pochemu-indiya-vybrala-francuzskie-rafale-esli-rossijskie-su-30-mki-bystree-manevrennee-i-deshevle?ysclid=m06av1if97426892199
          1. +1
            23 August 2024 09: 47
            These are tales of the Vienna Woods. EPR, like EPR, like any 4++ generation analogue.
            An aircraft with a gimbal cannot have an ESR less than an aircraft with hidden weapons and rational contours.
            The Indians took a finished product with AFAR and a universal...
            1. 0
              23 August 2024 09: 56
              Of course it can’t, of course EPR Su-57 must be less. But how much less it actually turned out to be is obvious that the Indians, as direct sponsors and future buyers of the PAK FA (Su-57), were familiarized with all the data in detail. And they didn't like it so much that they didn't even demand their 280 million dollars, which they had invested in advance in the PAK FA R&D, they "slammed the door" and left... They were probably also offended by the fact that their test pilots were not allowed to try out the PAK FA in the air. IMHO, this was the "last straw"...
              1. +1
                23 August 2024 10: 29
                The Indians are real traders and buyers. They bought and received all our last contracts - Su30, T90, Brahmos, etc. on very good terms during the collapse of the USSR and the Russian Federation. At that time, the Su30MKI was a very advanced system.
                Apparently, they decided to sell PAK FA to the Indians under "normal" conditions for this.....and not "for free". The same Rafale, according to the terms of sale, is far from the Su30MKI program. And the Indians themselves, as we see from the Tejas and MBT Arjun programs, can't do anything themselves.
                Given the armament of neighboring countries such as China and Pakistan, their path is not the right one.
            2. +1
              27 August 2024 12: 54
              And if the shoulder blades stick out in the frontal projection in such a way that the pendants could not even dream of?
              1. 0
                27 August 2024 15: 54
                What if they don’t stick out?
                Or are there blockers?
                And people (engineers) specifically designed it this way, having all the data on su27.
                Or was the goal to make EPR? And besides the blades, Rafal has one keel and no tilt, pillars with weapons, how does it all fly at super sound?
            3. 0
              28 August 2024 00: 43
              4th generation aircraft like Rafal or Eurofighter use an aircraft composite in the frontal projection, which greatly reduces the ESR and weight.
              1. -1
                28 August 2024 15: 39
                And everything else? What did I write about? Does it lower? And do they have an absorbent coating?
                You need to go to the Military Parity website. There are analysts of your kind there. We read here, the fish were lying here. We believe in this, but we don't believe in that. Such machines are a collection of compromises. Rafale and EF are the latest and most modern fighters of the 4th generation. Moreover, they were created immediately as 4++ machines. A lot of their systems correspond to 5th generation machines. But the 5th generation is designed differently.
                1. 0
                  28 August 2024 22: 27
                  It seems that it was not possible to arrange the Su-57 so that in the area of ​​stealth it corresponds to the 5th generation parameter. Although for the 5th generation, in addition to stealth, you need a modern AFAR radar, communications equipment and a corresponding army connected by these means, network-centric systems. Where the Russian army is in terms of communications equipment has long been no secret. If the Su-57 were a successful 5th generation aircraft, then there would be quite a few people willing to finance production by placing orders for dozens, if not hundreds of aircraft, such as China or India. It’s already the 3rd year of the SVO and it seems like there should be more of those 7 prototypes of the Su-57, they’re even talking about some kind of series. That’s where it would come in handy, squeezing between the radar stations and smashing something dill in the rear and what kind of advertising there would be. But we don’t see these cars even close to the front. One of the serious problems of the Russian and Chinese aviation industry is the lack of aviation composites, without which neither modern UAVs nor aircraft can be created.
  2. +17
    20 August 2024 05: 27
    And, frankly speaking, there will be no line of people willing to supply India with an engine for a new aircraft after the terrible failure of the Indian MMRCA super competition.

    There is a strange tendency to overload technical articles with irrelevant verbosity and fantasies.
    In July 2023, India and France signed the Horizon 2047 strategic partnership program. One of the points of this program is the development by Safran of engines for the Mark-2 AMCA and a multi-purpose helicopter.
    For a helicopter engine, a shareholder agreement has already been signed between Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL), India, and Safran Helicopter Engine, France, and a similar agreement is being prepared for a fighter aircraft.
    Of course, it is premature to say that cooperation between the Indians and the French will necessarily lead to success, however, a start has been made.
    1. -20
      20 August 2024 06: 17
      IMHO, in 5-10 years the Indians will buy the Su-75 as their main aircraft and the Su-57 as a “guards” aircraft. that is, the Su-75 is a replacement for the Mig-21 and Tezhdas, and the Su-57 is a replacement for the Su-30 and AMSA, but they will still try to finish the AMSA
    2. +1
      20 August 2024 07: 39
      Quote from Frettaskyrandi
      Of course, it is premature to say that cooperation between the Indians and the French will necessarily lead to success, however, a start has been made.

      The French are such partners. They do a good job for themselves. But what is intended for the 3rd world is not so good. Our experience of operating the sam 146 shows that this cooperation is very politically dependent on the level of relations between the parties, and the engine parts supplied by the French do not last the declared service life.
      1. +3
        21 August 2024 17: 14
        The French are still partners. They do themselves a good job. And what is intended for the 3rd world is somehow not very good.

        This is not true. World competition does not allow this to happen. That is why the French do not do this.
        1. -1
          22 August 2024 05: 55
          Quote: Strelkin
          Global competition does not allow doing this. that's why the French don't do that.

          It should not allow. Yes, it does. But today, world trade is very politicized. Therefore, the free honest market is dead, especially in such industries as engine building, aircraft manufacturing, and high-tech weapons production. You can ask about the hot part resource problems sam146.
          1. +1
            22 August 2024 11: 24
            I asked. And I did not find confirmation that “the nasty paddling pools are sending all sorts of bullshit abroad instead of standard aircraft units”:
            https://ruavia.su/the-french-will-return-spare-parts-for-sam146-engines-through-the-courts/
            The French will return spare parts for SaM146 engines through court
            13.03.2024, 08: 45

            According to the decision of the Arbitration Court of the Yaroslavl Region, the French company PowerJet will transfer to ODK-Saturn spare parts for the SaM146 engines installed on Superjet 100 aircraft. This is an interim measure in the claim of ODK-Saturn against Powerjet for $152 million, Mashnews reports.

            On March 4, the court granted the request of the Rybinsk engine manufacturer to provide access to SaM146 spare parts, which are necessary for UEC-Saturn to fulfill current contracts for aircraft maintenance. The interim measure came into force immediately after the verdict was announced. The company also asked the court to order the French company to resume fulfilling its obligations under joint contracts.

            “ODK-Saturn received fuel lines, fuel half-manifolds, segment fairings, roller bearings, nuts, bushings, linings, locking pins, borescope plugs and other parts,” writes Mashnews.

            “In justifying the need to transfer spare parts, UEC-Saturn, in particular, pointed out that the shortage of serviceable SaM146 engines among airlines leads to the suspension of operation of SSJ100 aircraft, which reduces the carrying capacity of the Russian civil aviation fleet and increases airline costs.

            For its part, PJSC UEC-Saturn is ready to compensate the French company for losses that it may incur in connection with the use of spare parts. In court, the United Engine Corporation was provided with a guarantee with an obligation to pay Powerjet any amount up to 6 billion rubles if UEC-Saturn does not compensate it for losses that may arise in connection with the use of interim measures.

            The problem with the supply of spare parts, consumables and components for the Franco-Russian SaM146 arose after the joint venture PowerJet stopped supplying and servicing its engines in Russia, voluntarily terminating its long-term partnership and cooperation with UEC-Saturn. PowerJet may suffer losses as a result of violating EU sanctions against Russia, introduced by the European Commission after the start of the special operation in Ukraine.
            ..........................
            This is NOT confirmed:
            The French are still partners. They do themselves a good job. And what is intended for the 3rd world is somehow not very good. Our experience in operating the sam 146 suggests that this cooperation is very politically dependent on the level of relations between the parties, and the engine parts supplied by the French do not reach the declared resource.
            1. 0
              22 August 2024 11: 43
              Quote: Strelkin
              The problem with the supply of spare parts, consumables and components for the Franco-Russian SaM146 arose after the PowerJet joint venture stopped supplying and servicing its engines in Russia.

              The problem arose before that. It arose from the fact that the engine did not maintain the declared service life, so it had to be changed more often. And in order to organize an increased replacement fund, they were taken from supplies for new aircraft. The main problem is cracks in the “hot part”, for which the French part of the joint venture is responsible. You need to seek an opinion on this from the companies operating the CCJ 100. Instead of 8000 hours, this part often lasted no more than 2000 hours. Therefore, many who bought these planes then replaced them with Boeings or watermelons.
              1. 0
                22 August 2024 11: 55
                Can you provide a link that "the product, instead of the required 8000 hours of operation, only lasts 2000, and then becomes unusable"? Or not can you?
                1. -2
                  22 August 2024 14: 39
                  There is an author in LiveJournal who referred to the material of Alexander Vorobyov from the Vedomosti newspaper. Make a request and read. Of course, some things can be questioned, but the rates of refusal to purchase aircraft are inexorable.
                  1. +1
                    22 August 2024 14: 47
                    Do you have a link? It’s not difficult to post it on this LiveJournal, is it?
                    aircraft acquisition failure rates are relentless.

                    ?? WHAT planes? Sukhoi Superjet? And who is to blame?
                    https://www.moscowtimes.nl/2023/11/13/rosteh-sorval-postavki-importozameschennih-ssj-100-iz-za-problem-s-dvigatelem-a112986
      2. 0
        27 August 2024 13: 05
        Yes Yes.
        There were hundreds of mirages of all kinds flying all over the world and it was considered a wonderful aircraft.
        Alpha Jets around the world.
        There are many A400s.
        Rafales are the same.
        This is for the military.

        For civilians, Falcons are a classic of business aviation.
        Hundreds of them fly in both private hands and government services.
  3. +1
    20 August 2024 05: 30
    They don’t even have a civil aircraft industry, do they? so there is no engineering school. neither military nor civilian, it will be difficult for them, but let them try. the one who walks will master the road
  4. -5
    20 August 2024 05: 30
    India must depend on us. It’s calmer, more reliable and the friendship is stronger.
    1. -1
      25 August 2024 13: 58
      So far, it is India and the Russian Federation that is dancing, and not vice versa
      1. 0
        25 August 2024 15: 40
        Bye! (Yes, it’s short, so what?)
    2. 0
      27 August 2024 13: 08
      This is when the addict had friendship with the one on whom he depends?
      Maybe during the times of serfs? Apparently not.
      Maybe during Roman slavery?
      The same seems to be not the case.

      Explain your opus.
      1. 0
        28 August 2024 08: 53
        Everything was described in the 19th century by Lord Palmerston - Britain has no permanent friends and no permanent enemies, Britain has permanent interests. Applies to all countries. There is no friendship between countries. How many friends did we have 35 years ago? All sorts of Bulgaria-Poland... Should I continue further, Mr. Opusologist?
  5. -3
    20 August 2024 06: 09
    God, Shiva, Allah, Buddha put everything in its place. This means that Indians, in principle, do not have to worry about technical issues. Dancing, music, contemplation, achieving Nirvana seems to be their lot. Yes
  6. 0
    20 August 2024 06: 30
    Praising Chinese airplanes is, after all, unnecessary. The same problems with the engine as the Indians. And blindly copying foreign samples does not solve the problem either. Yes, the Chinese, with their characteristic hard work and determination, are trying to develop their own science-intensive programs: materials science, steel casting, avionics. The only question is whether there will be enough cham. The experience of past “big leaps” shows that it’s easier to communize...
    1. 0
      23 August 2024 08: 53
      One way or another, China has its own fleet of Su-35S-class IBs with Russian and its own turbojet engines and created a single-engine I10 aircraft with one Al-31... and what does India have, which started with the more advanced Su-30MKI (China had a simpler version, the MKK)
    2. +1
      23 August 2024 10: 04
      1. The Chinese no longer have “big problems” with engines; they have actually caught up with Russia in terms of quality (lifetime, maximum operating temperatures), and are now chasing the USA.
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shenyang_WS-15
      2. China's development over the past 45 years has not the slightest analogy with the idiotic "Great Leap Forward" program of the 60s of the last century. They are intensively building their universities and scientific laboratories, attracting leading specialists from the most developed countries of the world - for a lot of money, of course. And they have a lot of money...
  7. +2
    20 August 2024 06: 37
    According to plans, it will be a single-seat, twin-engine, all-weather multi-role combat aircraft

    Why is the plane single-seat? The overload of weapons and instruments on a modern aircraft simply requires having a second pilot (navigator-operator)...
    1. -2
      20 August 2024 07: 25
      Quote: Luminman
      simply obliges to have a second pilot (navigator-operator)
      By 2035, artificial intelligence will completely replace the operator. Possibly the pilot too. Software is much easier to steal or reverse-engineer than turbine blade technology. And even the Indians have programmers, even if the moderators don't allow you to say what. Another thing is that most of them are only good for something, so it is possible that in the Indian version, instead of approaching the target, the AI ​​will dance around it "until exhaustion in the style of Ai-lai-lai".
      1. 0
        20 August 2024 08: 12
        Quote: Nagan
        then in the Indian version, instead of approaching the target, the AI ​​will dance “until exhaustion in the Ai-lai-lai style” around it.

        That is, they will satisfy the request from the Indian generals 100%?
      2. +3
        20 August 2024 08: 27
        Another thing is that most of them are suitable only in one cannot say that

        You're right. Dancing by dancing. And here they are great. This book is from the late 80s. Translated into a bunch of languages. For me, this is one of the best reference books of that time. The author is Indian. True, in the dedication he lists all his relatives down to his second cousins, uncles and aunts. laughing
        1. +3
          20 August 2024 08: 36
          Yes, I have met smart Indians. But all of them, without exception, either had 10 years of experience working in America, or came as children and received an education here. And those who studied there and gained work experience there, wrote such Indian code that sometimes it was easier to rewrite it from scratch than to edit the existing one. Now the testers there are normal. Going through the test plan meticulously point by point from A to Z is quite for them. I can't say about designing processors and low-level languages, I am more into C# and SQL.
          1. 0
            20 August 2024 08: 44
            Well, why wouldn't the Americans buy bright heads? Any, all over the world. Why condemn them? And it’s always cheaper to rewrite your own code than to meticulously disassemble someone else’s routine code. Even low level. Usually they “lick” and use only beautiful fragments of a particular solution.
          2. +2
            20 August 2024 08: 48
            I'm more and more into C# and SQL

            And I'm further RNR и Visual Basic I was never able to jump. Well, some more code C ++ I can poke around a little. However, I can do this, I'm just an amateur...

            we wrote such Indian code that at times it was easier to rewrite it from scratch than to edit the existing one

            According to rumors, Indians are paid by the number of characters, here they are are trying...
            1. +2
              20 August 2024 08: 55
              Believe me, C# is not much different from VB.NET (I also write in it) and uses the same libraries. And at least in theory it compiles into the same intermediate language. So if you really need it, you'll get the hang of it. As they say, it's not the gods who cast into potslol
        2. +1
          20 August 2024 10: 01
          Hmm, I didn’t come across this book at the time. Now the ball is ruled (with some reservations) by the book of the Harris family (David and Sarah) “Digital Circuit Design and Computer Architecture”. And all the “machine-aided design” was hidden behind the façade of system verilog. Moreover, enthusiasts are sawing exotics like SpinalHDL, and most likely this is not the last possible level of abstraction laughing
          As for where packages like Cadence went, I’m generally silent; all placement and optimization have long been completely left to the AI ​​(and this is precisely what it is strong at, especially considering the multi-billion-dollar number of elements).
          1. 0
            20 August 2024 11: 08
            Hmm, I didn't come across this book at the time.

            It was valuable to others - most of Intel's single-chip processors from 8080, 8085, 8086, Z80 from Zilog were painted. With architecture, address space, command system, registers, examples of memory and port organization, fragments of assembly code. Together with Jordain’s book on IBM PC, XT and AT and the technical descriptions in brochures that strictly go along with the EU ones from the GDR - in fact, by 1990 there was not a damn thing. And then ordinary amateurs generally had to be content with the magazines Radio and Modelist-Constructor. Volkov’s “Specialist” assembled it himself, traced, drilled and etched the board, converting it to fit what was at hand. There is still a DRB-8 lamp lying around to erase the UV ROM.
            1. +1
              20 August 2024 11: 46
              Oh, this is generally about architecture and programming. For some reason, based on the title, I thought that we were talking about CAD for microarchitecture design (and I was surprised, in those days microarchitecture was often still edited manually and exclusively in the bowels of commercial firms).
              That's how I soldered my Radio 86RK in the same way hi
              Although later he had more to do with the deceased DEC.
              Well, from scratch (due to graduation) I switched to BMK, and then, much later, to CPLD and FPGA.
      3. 0
        22 August 2024 08: 21
        Quote: Nagan
        or do reverse-engineering than turbine blade technology.

        So reverse engineering is the repetition of everything alien, including turbine blades)) How to make them without technology?)
    2. 0
      25 August 2024 14: 00
      No, if you approach the question normally. The F-35 does not have a second pilot and the norms, everyone takes
    3. 0
      27 August 2024 09: 45
      There was a reality of instrument overload, but it disappeared: the old F-15 versus the F-35:
      1. +1
        27 August 2024 16: 39
        Quote: Strelkin
        There was a reality of overload with instruments, but it disappeared: the old F-15 versus the F-35:

        She didn't go anywhere. The pilot is simply obliged to monitor all parameters of the aircraft - pressure and temperature of fuel and oil, flight speed and altitude, condition of the hydraulic system and locator data. Etc. And all these readings are displayed not on a separate device as before, but on a monitor, where some of the parameters are hidden so as not to overload the pilot’s attention...
        1. 0
          27 August 2024 18: 24
          - Swim-swim! It just floated away! On modern aircraft, a lot of parameters are controlled and regulated by automation, on-board computers and during normal operation the pilot does not need to be distracted by their functioning. And if necessary, the computer will display an appropriate warning...
          This also applies to combat work, so it is easier and simpler for a pilot to work on the F-22/F-35 than on the F-15. The US Air Force once conducted an experiment: they recruited a group of new pilots for the F-22, very young, with an average flight time of ~400 hours (not the worst, of course) - and they mastered the plane very quickly and successfully. Despite the fact that there are not even pairs, - a certain number of flights on the simulator - and off you go! The computer helps in everything, including piloting...
  8. +10
    20 August 2024 06: 40
    Indian fifth-generation fighter: it won’t take off without Russia

    Who knows. They also said a lot about the Indian lunar satellite...
    It won’t take off without Russia, it will take off with the help of Russia’s “best friends.”
  9. +7
    20 August 2024 06: 43
    It is mentioned twice that the Tejas cannot be compared with the MiG-21.
    How bad is Indo-European?

    It would be interesting to analyze the performance characteristics
    operating costs, operational readiness,
    concepts for using both within the Indian Air Force.

    It is clear that different eras, generations, etc.
    But we must be responsible for the “bazaar”.

    The Mig-29 is also “very bad” among the Ukrainians, but with the help of the Saxons,
    They have already screwed in small-sized UMPCs that are killing our guys.
    What's my point?... the mischief should already be a thing of the past.
    1. +8
      20 August 2024 11: 54
      This is Roman. wink Get used to it. But at least the articles are good because they force you to think critically, despite the author. And check.
  10. Eug
    -2
    20 August 2024 06: 47
    If the Indians decide to seriously modernize their Su-30MKI together with Russia, I don't see any particular threat to them from the J-20, especially if another 60-72 Su-30s in a modernized version are purchased in any form. We'll see...
    1. -1
      29 August 2024 01: 15
      If the Indians do decide to seriously modernize their Su-30MKI together with Russia, then I don’t see any particular threat to them from the J-20

      J-20 is a stealth aircraft, Su-30MKI is “he’ll tear a hot water bottle like Tuzik”...
      1. Eug
        0
        30 August 2024 06: 27
        Are you sure that the J-20 is stealth? With its AD scheme? Do you know of at least one stealth aircraft, other than the J-20, made according to the "duck" scheme? And the concept of low visibility is only for certain angles of radiation and corresponding frequencies.
        1. 0
          30 August 2024 13: 53
          The CIA claims that its frontal RCS is about 0.01 m².
  11. -7
    20 August 2024 07: 13
    Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL), which is the manufacturer, seems to have already started
    Limited means "Limited". Limited in everything - knowledge, skills, experience. And opportunities too. Of course, one and a half billion greenbacks is a lot of money, but not in the case of developing an aircraft, especially a fighter, especially a fifth-generation one. Even though the engine is purchased. Google what the F-35 program got into. As for the J-20, I'm not sure that even search engines will dig up the real figure, because it's China, and most likely a significant part of the project was not officially part of the project and was financed completely separately and secretly. Well, in the USSR, the official defense budget and real costs had a very relative relationship to each other. So, if the Indians want to have a fifth-generation fighter in the foreseeable future, then their fate is to buy either the F-35 or the Su-57, because the Chinese will not sell them. And something tells me that the Su-57 has a slightly higher chance. Firstly, it is cheaper. Secondly, no American president, even a democrat, and especially a Republican, will sign off on even a screwdriver assembly, much less localization of the F-35, abroad, and especially in India. And the Indians have not cancelled the "Make in India" program.
    1. +5
      20 August 2024 07: 41
      also
      Limited means "Limited". Limited in everything - knowledge, skills, experience. And possibilities


      As far as I know, this is simply a designation for a form of ownership where the owner's liability is limited to a certain amount.

      There may or may not be other restrictions because of this.
      1. -6
        20 August 2024 07: 43
        Yes, of course, in the business world this means “limited liability company,” but Limited really applies to turkeys in a broader sense.
      2. +2
        20 August 2024 10: 58
        As far as I know, this is simply a designation for a form of ownership where the owner's liability is limited to a certain amount.
        Limited Liability Company or LLC. For the Germans it will be GmbH. The names are different, hell the same wink
  12. -6
    20 August 2024 07: 21
    1,8 lard $ - this may be a serious amount, by Indian standards, but not enough to create a fifth-generation aircraft. The F-35 program is estimated at 2 trillion. $. Moreover, apparently, this amount will be exceeded. But, if the Indians want to waste a few lard on an absolutely useless activity, as was the case with Tejas, then we can wish them creative Uzbeks.
    1. +4
      20 August 2024 08: 14
      Quote: TermNachTER
      1,8 lard $ - this may be a serious amount, by Indian standards, but not enough to create a fifth-generation aircraft. The F-35 program is estimated at 2 trillion. $. Moreover, apparently, this amount will be exceeded. But, if the Indians want to waste a few lard on an absolutely useless activity, as was the case with Tejas, then we can wish them creative Uzbeks.

      2 trillion is not the budget for the development of one aircraft.
      This is the development of 10+ versions that are very different from each other.
      This is the production of 3000+ aircraft and all related equipment, training and other things for 50 years.
      This is their operation with everything, including costs for airfields, ammunition, etc. for 50 years
      1. -2
        20 August 2024 10: 10
        So I say - the whole program, although the figure is not final. But the order of the numbers explains the breadth of breadth and depth of depth of the problem that the Indians took on. I'm not even talking about all sorts of related problems that will appear during the course of the play)))
        1. +3
          20 August 2024 10: 32
          India ranks 5th in the world in terms of nominal GDP, almost twice that of Russia. If the Russian Federation can pull it off, then so can India
          Not to mention that the growth rate of Indian GDP is much higher than that of Russia.
          1. -5
            20 August 2024 11: 11
            GDP is a very tricky number that can explain anything. In terms of the level of corruption, it is also one of the first places in the world))) it would be nice to also have a design school, which cannot be bought for a million lacs of rupees - this is decades of development. And “Tejas” - this was clearly demonstrated; it was not possible to assemble a construction set with “crazy hands” from Russian, American, European and Jewish parts. And a lot of money was spent. In general, it is not clear why they abandoned the joint project with Russia to create a fifth-generation aircraft. For them this was a real chance to learn and get some technology, and not what the French sold them)))
    2. -7
      20 August 2024 08: 44
      Quote: TermNachTER
      The F-35 program is estimated at 2 trillion. $.

      Two trillion, this is “in relation to meanness”, if you have read the Russian classics) We don’t know how much development actually costs in the USA. If only because the F35 will end up in landfills, not yet being fully developed.
      1. -7
        20 August 2024 10: 12
        Well, how they know how to cut the budget in the USA can only be described in the style of ancient Russian epics, there is no other way. If a pilot's helmet alone costs 400 kilobucks, what can we say about other things?
        1. -3
          20 August 2024 22: 36
          Somehow you and I have terribly angered the local collective unconscious. Well, who will minus with all his might, and silently)) I must say that the pluses and minuses on the Internet have gained some kind of strange power over people. Apparently, these people are thinking of hurting us somehow)
        2. -3
          20 August 2024 23: 24
          Well, I’ll give + to you, and you to me))) well, just laugh))) in general, I very rarely give + or -, unless I categorically disagree or agree.
      2. 0
        27 August 2024 09: 49
        It will go to landfills in 2070, the year “so unfinished”... laughing
  13. -6
    20 August 2024 07: 22
    And once upon a time they flew on vimanas. When you read their fairy tales, it takes your breath away. Where did all this go? By the way, Sanjeev Kumar - it seems like he was such an artist, has he really retrained? laughing
    1. -6
      20 August 2024 10: 13
      There was a film actor Vijay Kumar, but a long time ago, however, the surname is quite common. Although I like it - you’re already crazy, get bored)))
    2. -1
      20 August 2024 22: 38
      The guys on the vimanas once unleashed a battle of incredible proportions. Where they disappeared along with the vimanas. The population of many countries died there. Almost entirely. Only the cunning traders survived, hiding in puddles of shit and covering themselves with their trays. They continued the family line, passing on their best skills to their descendants...
  14. Des
    +6
    20 August 2024 07: 22
    Nevertheless, we cannot develop an aircraft ourselves from beginning to completion - neither small aircraft, nor transport, nor passenger, nor various military ones. Either an inheritance from the USSR, or cooperation with foreign companies. And it’s not about money, but about technology and that same “design” (“Russia also has its own and very unique CS, and it is unlikely that anyone in the world would dare to challenge this.”) school.
    Although India cannot (and will not yet be able to) create, for example, an airplane, it has more opportunities for purchase and development. Their “dances” can be eliminated (an example of solving similar problems is the People’s Republic of China).
    And why didn't India cooperate with South Korea...
    1. -8
      20 August 2024 08: 41
      Quote: Des
      However, we cannot develop the aircraft ourselves from start to finish.

      We can. Well, that is... In general, the “Moscow representative office of Boeing” developed Boeings from beginning to end. No problem. Being 100% staffed in the design department by domestic designers. Boeing now has huge problems, but not with the design part, everything is fine here, but with execution. American execution.
      So Russian designers can certainly develop any aircraft) But Russian managers cannot organize the business, that’s another story...
      1. Des
        +7
        20 August 2024 08: 47
        Quote: Mikhail3
        We can. Well, that is... In general, the “Moscow representative office of Boeing”...
        those. Still, we can’t.
        1. -8
          20 August 2024 08: 57
          Re-read my post again. Not only can we, but if necessary, we can develop in the manner of the American school better than the Americans. Changing the “hand” is generally unique for a designer, but ours can) So build, not steal... but this is not a complaint about the development. Developing is not a problem...
    2. -3
      20 August 2024 08: 42
      Quote: Des
      Nevertheless, we cannot develop an aircraft ourselves from beginning to completion - neither small aircraft, nor transport, nor passenger, nor various military ones. Either an inheritance from the USSR, or cooperation with foreign companies.

      At the moment this is the case. But I keep my fingers crossed that the imported Superjet and MC-21 enter production faster.
      1. Des
        +1
        20 August 2024 08: 45
        Quote: Stas157
        But I’m keeping my fingers crossed that the imported Superjet and MC-21 go into production sooner
        Is there such a thing as 100%?)
        Of course that would be great.
        1. -2
          20 August 2024 08: 54
          Quote: Des
          Is there such a thing as 100%?)

          If we can produce a large series under conditions of hellish sanctions, then what difference does it make? The plane itself, engines, avionics... Our own. The rest is not so significant.
          I hope that equipment for the production of composite wings will also be replaced over time. Or they will cooperate with the Chinese. They also really need this now.
          1. Des
            -2
            20 August 2024 08: 58
            I hope.
            The comment carries no meaning other than emotional goodwill.
      2. +1
        20 August 2024 09: 06
        It won't work, at least for now. How did it work with the Superjet? Let's take the engines. Who will supply us with engines? Our unique specialists are organizing a tender - who will offer them a larger bribe and a safer method of obtaining it, for the supply of these engines. And so on for all other nodes.
        An extremely respected specialization in Moscow, its skills are in no way suitable for managing the development of its engines. There, you see, there are other tasks. Not at all similar to the previous ones. But the entire management of our oaks) is assembled precisely for that very superjet task! They understand absolutely nothing about development and implementation! They never solved such issues!
        Foreign engines have ALREADY been developed, tested, etc. The only question was the size of the baksheesh! The qualifications of our Oaks are not even a hair higher than baksheesh. But what kind of money can you take from our half-dead factories? Well, that is, they will try, since they don’t know how to do anything else, but our factories not only have no super profits, but also no profits as such. So the money from the order is either used for a bribe, or for at least some kind of work. No way for both!)
        1. 0
          27 August 2024 13: 49
          Ours made PD-14.
          It really is two or even three times more expensive than its classmates.
          And according to the resource, it’s like “not Hello”...

          Accordingly, there will be no economy for air carriers.
          It turns out that tickets will become more expensive and consume a little more fuel, and produce more engines.

          For the average retiree on the couch, this may be “bullshit.”
          And for the country as a whole?
          These are only losses.

          Making an engine is one thing.
          Making a good engine, economical, cheap, durable - this is completely different.

          And here, precisely here, we have never had a design and technology school.

          And here we are inferior to real guests and strongly to all technically developed countries.

          Our military aircraft engines still have a service life of no more than 4000 hours.
          American military engines of the last 15 years have a service life of 12000-15000 thousand. But not hours, but cycles.
          The cycle is takeoff, flight, landing.
          Regardless of flight time.
          They are already neglecting this parameter.

          Now what a difference.
          1. 0
            27 August 2024 13: 56
            Quote: SovAr238A
            American engines of the last 15 years have a service life of 12000-15000 thousand

            That's true. When we surrendered as adversaries in the Cold War, the proud victors of the USSR, among other conditions of ignominious surrender, banned smelting and other methods of obtaining thousands and thousands of alloys and other materials necessary for the production of breakthrough machines. Aircraft engines, of course, belong to such machines, and without all this nomenclature they cannot be made normally. And for the last 15 years, the Americans, as you rightly noted, have been using the former technologies of the USSR (which, as you know, only made galoshes) that they bought for air, and therefore have seriously advanced.
            Also keep in mind that the USSR had a slightly different approach to the overhaul interval. It was considered more efficient to replace the entire engine than to constantly repair it. Whether this is good or not is for experts to judge...
      3. -3
        20 August 2024 10: 22
        Hmm..Are there such planes? Boeing also has Russian components. Let’s keep silent about titanium
        1. +1
          20 August 2024 10: 45
          Quote: Alexey Alekseev_5
          Hmm..Are there such planes? Boeing also has Russian components. Let’s keep silent about titanium

          The task is not to completely replace imported components, but to be able to produce aircraft regardless of which component suppliers fall out in the process. Boeing can cope with this (it is not threatened by it!). And Russia? I really hope so too.
        2. 0
          27 August 2024 14: 30
          And what? Where is the woman's head, and where is the devil's father? What does titanium have to do with it?
          1. 0
            27 August 2024 18: 02
            And the blades in a Boeing engine are made from crap. And the hydraulics on the chassis are made in Russia
  15. +5
    20 August 2024 07: 55
    . How many car factories have foreigners opened in Russia before 2022? And how many are working now?

    It's better not to ask. But they sang soaring songs about what a great guy Putin is. Now, they say, we are releasing more USSR! And not just any galoshes, but Toyotas and BMWs!
    And, they say, the West will not take those factories to itself!
    And in 22, everyone suddenly became quiet.
    After all, even the Lada, which is Vesta, could not be launched without Chinese spare parts.
  16. -5
    20 August 2024 08: 26
    When the Su-75 is available, it can be offered as an alternative.
  17. -6
    20 August 2024 08: 34
    It is gratifying to read that the Indian lawless traders received tinsel. But we need India. Both as a client and as a counterweight to China. I believe that a fundamental mistake was made initially, which led to the current situation.
    Any small trader from the dirty illegal market (no high positions and billions of dollars in income will ever change Indian “entrepreneurs”) always starts hustling with prices when he sees that there is a buyer for this mahalai. Why is trade with India so... well, so? Because we initially allowed her to become like this. Because there was no way out of it, so it all started back in the USSR.
    To deal with Indians, you must not stoop to their level of trade. It’s hard and difficult (well, a small, tiny little concession, and everything will be! I swear by Shiva!!), but it must be done. Stop negotiations as soon as the smallest akhalay begins. Raise the price for every attempt at mahalaya. Dispassionately demand 100% advance payment as soon as the Indians mention “price clarification.”
    Alas, the trading experience of our top brass is limited to selling stolen goods at any price, as well as the rich experience of black marketeering in the USSR. These are not the techniques that give results, remember at least the most shameful price rally with gas... If you hold firm, after a fairly short time you can suddenly see quite adequate negotiating partners opposite you. The Indians can do this too. Simply, if you are being led astray, why not use Mahalai?
  18. +1
    20 August 2024 10: 07
    The AMCA is designed as a single-seat, twin-engine combat aircraft. The AMCA Mark 1 will be equipped with 5th generation technologies, while the Mark 2 will have incremental improvements to the 6th generation technologies... The AMCA will be equipped with a larger and more powerful variant of the Uttam AESA radar, which will use gallium nitride (GaN) technology. [42].

    And the most interesting thing is what they write
    The Israeli Air Force plans to purchase at least 125 AMCAs in Mark-1 and Mark-2 configurations. [27]

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HAL_AMCA
    Here it is worth looking back, and you can see that Russian aircraft designers Sikorsky, Lebedev, Gakkel, Grigorovich, Tupolev and Polikarpov did not engage in stupid reverse engineering

    Has the author heard about the history of the creation of the Tu-4 "Superfortress"?
    1. +6
      20 August 2024 12: 56
      Has the author heard about the history of the creation of the Tu-4 "Superfortress"?

      It’s just that the author is far from technical and in most cases does not even understand what he is writing about.
      Of course, they didn’t engage in stupid reverse engineering. They engaged in smart reverse engineering, that is, they took into account their own technological capabilities and made appropriate changes taking into account these same capabilities.
      By the way, Lebedev did not design airplanes at all, and Gakkel did not engage in reverse engineering, he built his own designs, and all of them were unsuccessful. And Sikorsky too.
  19. +2
    20 August 2024 10: 52
    details. The collector collects them into nodes. The installer installs the units in place. And so on
    Not really. There are also engineers who carefully study all the components of the aircraft and are probably trying to copy it all. But so far nothing is working
    1. +2
      20 August 2024 15: 05
      With respect, but as a technologist I can say this is not true at all, unfortunately. In the current state of our aircraft engine industry, there is not a single worthy designer or technologist. For so many years, we have not been able to even replicate a single good foreign aircraft engine. I am talking about the civil direction. And in India, even more so. hi
      1. +2
        20 August 2024 17: 09
        for so many years we cannot at least repeat a single good foreign aircraft engine
        The designers themselves will not be able to do anything without appropriate support from the state. Compare the work of aircraft designers in the 30s with the state of affairs today
        1. 0
          27 August 2024 13: 56
          Several billion dollars were allocated for PD-14.
          Numbers from 6 to 12.
          This is multiple more than the cost of civilian hits from P-U, GE, RR, Snekma.
          Money can not buy happiness
  20. +2
    20 August 2024 11: 49
    Question to the author, what’s wrong with the AL-41F1?
  21. 0
    20 August 2024 12: 15
    Not a single person at the factory that supposedly produces the aircraft can answer the question of why this unit is the way it is and how it can be improved. It was invented by completely different people.
    Oh well? Oh, well, yes, yes, Skomorokhov...
  22. +3
    20 August 2024 12: 54
    There are design schools in the USA, Britain, Germany, Italy

    It is impossible not to mention the French school, absolutely authentic with original and very good machines, designed and produced in-house from the fuselage to power plants and avionics, as well as nationally produced weapons.
    1. -1
      20 August 2024 16: 29
      Quote: velikoros-xnumx
      It is impossible not to mention the French school

      The French aviation school consisted entirely of German engineers invited or kidnapped after the war by the French intelligence services...
  23. +2
    20 August 2024 13: 49
    After this phrase I stopped reading - “Yes, the aircraft industry of the Russian Empire was very undeveloped, there were no engines, there wasn’t a lot of things, but: already by the 30s, on our own engines, albeit created on the basis of imported ones,...”
    According to the author, the aircraft engines and everything else started on their own, like fleas on a dog.
    There were no Russian designers Tupolev and Polikarpov - there were Soviet aircraft designers - since both were in the Republic of Ingushetia - no one.
    Anyone who tries to hide and gloss over the leading role of the economic system of socialism in the creation of the domestic aircraft industry is a traitor.
    1. 0
      20 August 2024 17: 19
      since both were in RI-nobody.

      Are Sikorsky and Grigorovich suitable?
      Anyone who tries to hide and gloss over the leading role of the economic system of socialism in the creation of the domestic aircraft industry is a traitor.
      Well, socialism gave birth, for example, to the requirements for a long-range, high-altitude, 4-engine dive bomber....isn't this by any chance a betrayal of common sense?
      1. +1
        20 August 2024 23: 32
        requirements for a long-range, high-altitude 4-engine dive bomber...

        This joke was heard only from Tupolev himself, and the grandfather was quite the joker. I remember he invented a flying swear-box, did not sell it to the state, modestly called it "Maxim Gorky" and hung it around the neck of the Writers' Union. How many motors were there? Only eight? Not enough, not enough! The grandfather was eager to build something even more motorized and grandiose, but he was held back by the coattails. The country simply would not have withstood this burst of fantasy.
        1. 0
          22 August 2024 07: 28
          seriously ? Don’t we make noise defending the “good” name of the party?
          K-7, G-1 are also Tupolev’s developments, and Tupolev also performed under the pseudonym Vakhmistrov, right?
          1. 0
            28 August 2024 14: 45
            Read and it will be revealed to you. The Union of Writers of the USSR, and specifically Mikhail Efimovich Koltsov, shook money from the people. The K-7 is a creation made of shit and sticks by another underestimated genius, Konstantin Alekseevich Kalinin, and the G-1 is definitely a Tupolev reworking of the TB-1. And this is the source of inspiration for the Vakhmistrov Circus. Exactly 105 years ago, on January 26, 1918, the world's first successful test of a flying aircraft carrier took place. The Zeppelin L-35 airship took off with an Albatross D.III fighter suspended under its hull. At an altitude of one hundred and fifty kilometers, the plane detached itself from the carrier, turned on its engine, made several maneuvers, and landed safely. And don't forget that Tupolev was one of the bosses of the aviation industry until his arrest.
            1. 0
              28 August 2024 17: 31
              Read and it will be revealed to you....

              yeah, 20 you claimed that it was a matter of grandfather’s wishes, now there are other names.
              So maybe it’s not about Tupolev, but about the ideas of that time, for which the state gave money?
              1. 0
                13 September 2024 07: 11
                "So maybe it's not about Tupolev, but about the ideas of that time, for which the state gave money?"
                And the ideas were in the heads, and the heads were then criticized, sometimes categorically and definitively.
  24. -3
    20 August 2024 14: 06
    Their rifles don’t fire, their tanks don’t drive, their missiles don’t fly. But it’s our own, without import substitution. And all this without the participation of the Russian Federation. What is the fifth generation of aviation? Elephants with turbans to help them.)) Yes, and you can sing and dance, gypsies, eprst.))
  25. +1
    20 August 2024 14: 36
    What, do we have a 5th generation fighter? According to all technical characteristics this is 4++++
  26. 0
    20 August 2024 16: 23
    “Make in India” is a good motto, however, the main thing here is not to go too far. But the Indians sometimes fail to do this. Not many countries agree to transfer technology and shake for every rupee in disputes with the Indians.
  27. -2
    20 August 2024 18: 49
    The main thing is that you can dance and sing.
  28. Alf
    -1
    20 August 2024 19: 04
    But “Arjun” has so far remained an armored weakness, and it is unlikely that “Arjun-2” will be able to correct the mistakes of the first.
  29. 0
    20 August 2024 19: 48
    Quote: george.old
    Well, socialism gave birth, for example, to requirements for a long-range, high-altitude 4-engine dive bomber.... this is not a betrayal of common sense at all times

    I spoke about the economic system of socialism, as the backbone of the domestic aviation industry. It’s not the designers who decide—the economic system. They demolished the system and aviation is out of business, chewing up the Soviet legacy.
    And the fact that a variety of concepts have been put forward is the reason for the creative search, the won-He-177 should also be a dive initially, but any anti-adviser granddaughter of Goebbels, therefore, does not notice the logs in the camp of his idols.
  30. -2
    20 August 2024 19: 52
    Quote: Mikhail3
    Because there was no way out of it, so it all started back in the USSR.

    Again the orderlies didn’t check and the patient escaped into the net.
    Again, among the anti-Sovietists, the USSR is to blame for him, apparently looking at his shriveled, withered appendage, he again denounces the USSR, which has not developed methods of eternal male power.
    This is some kind of schizophrenia.
  31. +5
    20 August 2024 23: 15
    Roman, you remind me of Soviet propagandists of almost 50 years ago, who were just as witty in their jokes about the Chinese economy. And as for India, there are examples of how it works there too. Let's take oil as an example, which we were piling up like it was the last day before closing. For which we were paid with banknotes from a joke bank, which you can't even wipe your ass with - they're small and they paint you. You can't buy anything with them, because these tantric yogis are not fools, they sell tea, cotton, medicine and many other things for candy wrappers, for which there is a queue to buy with real money. The comedy "Pussy Dancers" ended with all the accumulated waste paper being invested in the local "horns and hooves" offices. Under the promise of earning even more of what they call money and smile meaningfully. There is an old joke about Rabinovich and the profit from eggs. But they didn't pay him in rupees, for such a gamble the old man would have immediately written a five-kopeck note. So expect a new exciting dance.
    1. 0
      25 August 2024 12: 31
      Well, yes, they promised to catch up with Portugal, now we’ll laugh at the Indians, and soon we’ll show that our economy is no match for Tajikistan or Afghanistan.
  32. 0
    21 August 2024 09: 54
    Quote: lelik613
    Grandfather was eager to build something even more powerful and grandiose, but he was held back by his coattails. The country simply could not withstand this impulse of fantasy.

    It’s hard not to agree. The commander-in-chief of the USSR YES, Reshetnikov, wrote very interesting things about this family (What happened and what happened) - they were still there.
  33. +1
    21 August 2024 10: 00
    No, there is no doubt that these Frenchmen know how to work with engines.

    No, there is no doubt that Skomorokhov knows how to write an article.
  34. 0
    21 August 2024 12: 27
    India and Fighter Jet Manufacturing..
    Things are incompatible.
  35. 0
    22 August 2024 07: 25
    What remains is to raise the vimanas and give everyone a khan at once?
  36. 0
    23 August 2024 17: 22
    Quote: Strelkin
    They found the Rafale. Which has a frontal ESR (without suspensions!) of the order of 0.2-0.3 m²

    And how much with suspended weapons and fire-fighting tanks? And what will the Rafale be good for without suspensions?
  37. 0
    23 August 2024 17: 57
    Well done. Everything is correct, but the second stage engine is already being installed on the SU 57.
  38. 0
    23 August 2024 21: 24
    The AMCA project in India is proposed to be renamed AMCA WE. What is WE is White Elephant, in common parlance “White Elephant”... with all that it entails.
  39. 0
    25 August 2024 11: 26
    In general, there is no such thing as the Indian 5th generation. Just as there is no Chinese, European or anything else except American and Russian. No one has more complete technology. Well, except for a united Europe.
  40. +1
    25 August 2024 12: 29
    No, the Indians are great, they are trying to install their radars, trying to replace Russian avionics elements with Israeli ones...
    Yes, the Indians are great. And the lamentations about “they don’t take Russian things that have no analogues...” are clearly unnecessary. If they don’t have an engineering school, they will create one; if they don’t have the competencies, they will hire people with the competencies. They have money for this and many, many young people (most people in general) from whom they can select talented ones and train them. And you shouldn't envy them. They also laughed at the Chinese at the beginning, but now it’s no laughing matter if you count their planes or ships.
  41. +1
    27 August 2024 00: 44
    I wouldn't laugh at the Indians like that. At one time they laughed at the Chinese - now they themselves are nowhere and no one without China. We laugh at the Indians, but for some reason we forget that in many areas we also depend on them: for some reason they can do it, but we can’t. And there are fewer and fewer reasons. Look at Roscosmos, how they smacked his lips so deliciously.
  42. 0
    27 August 2024 13: 51
    India is a tick on the body of Russia. Everyone wants it for free, for half the price, remember Igor Mamenko.
  43. 0
    22 November 2024 13: 36
    1,8 billion US dollars,

    A pittance for such a project.