Tactical transporter "Plastun-TT"

31
Tactical transporter "Plastun-TT"
All-terrain vehicle "Plastun-TT"


As practice has shown, in some situations of modern armies Light and maneuverable transport, such as buggies and all-terrain vehicles, is required. The Russian armed forces already have equipment of this class, and new models are currently being developed. For example, the tactical transporter Plastun-TT was first presented at the military-technical forum Army-2024. It is designed to transport people and cargo.



Premiere in Moscow


A promising tactical transporter for the army was developed by the Russian All-Terrain Vehicles Plastun company. It already produces a family of multi-purpose tracked vehicles called Plastun, and recently decided to expand its range with a new wheeled all-terrain vehicle.

The new Plastun-TT model was first presented to specialists and the general public at the Army-2024 forum. The goals and objectives of the project were revealed, as well as the characteristics of the resulting machine. In addition, photos and videos from tests were published, demonstrating the main aspects of operation and application.

The goal of the Plastun-TT project was to create passable and mobile transport for the Russian army. This all-terrain vehicle is proposed to transport various cargo and people, including the delivery of ammunition and the evacuation of the wounded from the front line.

The conveyor is built on the basis of domestic components. The engine, transmission and axles were borrowed from Russian production cars, and the remaining units were developed by the manufacturing company itself.


Tactical transporter being tested

The developers note that among the already produced all-terrain vehicles there are no direct analogues of the Plastun-TT. Existing models differ from it in their technical appearance and the use of imported components and other features.

Today and tomorrow


Currently, a prototype of the new all-terrain vehicle is undergoing road and off-road testing in one of Russia's regions. The tests are being conducted by civilian specialists with the participation of Military.

The all-terrain vehicle successfully copes with test tasks and receives positive feedback. According to the developers, no comments have been received yet.

The company “Russian all-terrain vehicles “Plastun” is preparing for mass production of new transporters. Production capacity allows the production of up to 20 all-terrain vehicles per month. If there is an order from the Ministry of Defense, then at least 40 vehicles can be delivered by the end of the year.

The conclusion of the contract will increase production. In this case, by the spring of 2025 it will be possible to achieve a production rate of 40-50 cars per month. However, it is not yet known what order the Ministry of Defense can place and how long it will take to complete it.


Articulation node

It is reported that the Ministry of Defense is already interested in Plastun-TT. A future contract is currently being negotiated and its terms are being discussed. It is expected that the finished document will appear in the near future, and after that the manufacturing company will launch mass production of all-terrain vehicles.

Technical features


"Plastun-TT" is a two-axle all-wheel drive off-road vehicle, created using ready-made components from production models. It is easy to operate and is designed for transporting goods and people, including transporting bedridden wounded.

The all-terrain vehicle has an articulated design. Its frame consists of two halves connected by a special hinge. The frame and hinge are made of stainless steel tubing, which gives maximum strength with limited weight.

Using a hydraulic drive, the frame bends in a horizontal plane. This allows the all-terrain vehicle to turn and maneuver, and also improves its maneuverability.

The front half of the frame houses the main components of the propulsion system and the axle. There is also a two-seater cabin with a control post.


The rear part of the frame is equipped with a second axle, the drive of which is organized through a cardan shaft. On the second link, an onboard body for the payload is mounted.

The developers do not specify the models of the engine, gearbox and transfer case that are used in the Plastun-TT. However, it is known that these components were taken from the Niva car.

Currently, Niva Legend and Niva Travel cars are equipped with 1,7 liter gasoline engines with a power of 80 hp. Both use a five-speed manual transmission.

The axles with self-locking differentials are taken from the Gazelle car, and the cardan shafts are supplied by the Ulyanovsk Automobile Plant.

The all-terrain vehicle is equipped with wheels of size 12.4L-16 8PR, specially adapted for off-road driving. The design of the chassis gives a ground clearance of 280 mm.

"Plastun-TT" can accelerate to 100 km/h on the highway and has a power reserve of 400 km. The rear link body can carry up to 1 ton of cargo.


The all-terrain vehicle is controlled by one driver, who is located in an open cockpit on the front link of the vehicle. There may be a passenger next to him. There are safety bars installed above the cabin, which can also serve as a frame for the awning.

The payload is housed in the rear link body. There are benches along the sides, and in the front there is an additional seat. There are safety bars. For ease of boarding and loading, the rear side of the body folds down. The body can accommodate up to 6–8 passengers or 2 bedridden patients with an accompanying person.

Potential and Opportunities


Practice has shown that the Russian army needs light and passable transport, such as buggies, all-terrain vehicles, etc. This technique significantly increases the mobility of individual units and helps them carry out combat and support missions.

The Plastun-TT tactical transporter was developed taking into account similar needs of the army. Production of this equipment will begin in the near future, and it will be delivered to the front. The new all-terrain vehicles are proposed to be used together with existing equipment, which will have a positive impact on the transport capabilities of the troops.

"Plastun-TT" has a number of important features and advantages that have already attracted the interest of a potential customer and should ensure successful operation.


The main advantages of the vehicle are related to its driving characteristics - mobility and cross-country ability on various terrain. High results are achieved thanks to the special frame design, chassis features, all-wheel drive and other factors.

The all-terrain vehicle is capable of carrying up to 10 people. or up to 1 ton of cargo. This is enough to solve most problems on the front line or near the rear. The Plastun-TT can be used as a light transport for scouts or a supply truck.

"Plastun-TT" is distinguished by high performance characteristics. The key components of the all-terrain vehicle are taken from domestically produced serial vehicles, which makes it easier to maintain the vehicle, supply spare parts and other aspects.

It is worth noting that the Plastun-TT does not have structural protection and the possibility of standard equipment with weapons. However, practice has shown that the intended methods of application make it possible to do without these funds. If necessary, such issues can be quickly resolved at the factory or in the home.

For the needs of the army


The Russian defense industry takes into account the needs of the armed forces and creates the equipment they need. In particular, light all-terrain vehicles are being actively developed that can perform various tasks at the front and in the rear.

The units involved in the Special Operation already have a significant number of such all-terrain vehicles of various types. Their fleet is gradually expanding, and in the near future the first Plastun-TT transporters may be included in it. How quickly this will happen and whether the new model will live up to expectations will become clear in the foreseeable future.
31 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. -3
    19 August 2024 04: 27
    The Plastun-TT tactical transporter was developed taking into account similar needs of the army.

    The idea of ​​​​creating it was taken from the appearance of a TPK born in 1975, produced in the Ukrainian SSR, taking into account modern requirements for protection and cross-country ability:
    1. 0
      19 August 2024 05: 30
      Plus from the American M561 Gama Goat. In service 1970s–1990s.
    2. +2
      19 August 2024 09: 26
      Yes, it’s a masterpiece to compare a low amphibian with a mini Kirov resident. For the plant to copy this Luaz, it seems to be a terrible problem. And private owners are not interested. There, at least give up the cardan shafts for the CV joints. Well, it’s difficult to rearrange the gearbox so that you can drive back in all-wheel drive. The motor from the Oka would be enough. And now a liter Chinese V-shaped one would fit there - they put the Ural on a motorcycle and it drags confidently. Yes, a 3-cylinder engine with a 90 hp piston from a VAZ has already been created in the Kulibina database. All that remains is to certify. If Dorokhov can help with this matter, then at least a heavy motorcycle and (or) a quad with this engine will go into production.
    3. +1
      27 August 2024 14: 31
      Why was it ripped off and why specifically from a corpse carrier from the USSR, when almost all armies had and have had similar equipment for a hundred years now, only in different configurations, and the tasks of all, plus or minus, are practically the same.
    4. +1
      8 September 2024 10: 11
      Quote: ROSS 42
      The idea of ​​creating a rerun

      from the head of a person with an adequate, properly functioning brain. Because the idea is obvious - a light, or better yet, ultra-light vehicle is needed to increase the mobility of units in modern conditions. At the same time, its transport spaces should be open, which will allow for quick cover on the ground or opening fire in any direction from personal weapons.
      Since all this is completely obvious for modern warfare, this idea could not penetrate into the generals' minds of the Ministry of Defense, as the customer. Our military minds are not structured that way. And so a third-party developer and manufacturer offers the army technical innovations that its fighters desperately need. I seriously doubt that the Ministry of Defense will accept them.
      The fact that such transporters are desperately needed on the front lines does not change the fact that the manufacturer clearly does not have the money to pay a bribe commensurate with the general's appetites...
  2. +2
    19 August 2024 05: 34
    In general, a walk-behind tractor with a trailer and rear drive wheels. It is not clear why the Niva engine is there. He obviously won’t be able to drive faster than 20 km per hour, 20 horses will be too much for him. The design is clearly overcomplicated due to the placement of the driver's cabin on a walk-behind tractor. Place the cab on a trailer and you won’t need hydraulics: a gearbox will suffice. The trailer itself is clearly short: there is no room for the crew to sleep or for the wounded to be laid out at full length.
    In general, the authors have proven themselves, but something simpler and cheaper needs to be done for the army. Like the Belarusian MB-1 from the 80s, but with rear-wheel drive from a PTO. This drive was envisaged there, but was not made.
    1. 0
      19 August 2024 16: 40
      Well, it is stated that it accelerates to hundreds of km/h.
  3. +2
    19 August 2024 09: 13
    The design of all-terrain vehicles uses components and assemblies of the Renault-Nissan-Mitsubishi alliance.

    I read the following phrase on the manufacturer's website.
  4. +6
    19 August 2024 09: 20
    Another miscarriage from crazy "innovators".
    It’s not clear why bother with all this? Why an articulated frame for a car of this size? Why bother with a stainless steel frame - who will weld it at the front in case of damage.
    You need, as some here write, an analogue of the TPK LUAZ - the engine and transmission should only be taken from the Oka.
    Lightweight aluminum body on a welded steel frame, removable frame for soft roof, front-wheel drive, for simplicity.
    but none of this will happen - cheap and affordable vehicles do not provide profits and kickbacks.
    1. +1
      19 August 2024 23: 28
      I think the business idea of ​​the manufacturer (for now only tracked vehicles) is to use the customer’s money to create (develop, test, launch into series...) a new model range (mini-Kirovets). This was the case with GAZ and the Tiger, for example.

      Why LuAZ needs a “break” is another question. Something tells me that in the USSR they thought through the TPK issue and got a simple LuAZ, and not a mini-Kirovets, which seems to be a hint.
    2. 0
      21 August 2024 17: 58
      An acquaintance of mine, Alexander Vlasov, died, brought TPKs to the DPR in 14 or 15, he dealt with them professionally, and said that it would not be suitable for military operations. There is a piece of his soul in this transporter; together we thought about what kind of car it should be.
    3. +1
      27 August 2024 14: 42
      The same stillborn as the AG-34.
  5. +1
    19 August 2024 09: 30
    It is interesting whether the tires are made by us or not. And even Kamaz came up with a 21-inch landing size - and there’s almost no choice. And for jeeps, some off-road tire sizes are also not produced in the Russian Federation.
  6. 0
    19 August 2024 14: 08
    Ingenious design for a cheap transporter! The whole point is that there are no swivel wheels, CV joints, racks or worms. Two rear axles from Niva. On the steering wheel there are hydraulic system valves and two inexpensive hydraulic cylinders in a turning point. On mini tractors and loaders, this control system is widely used and works well. The disadvantage is the high wear of tires on hard soils and worse handling than swivel wheels. The cost of mass production can be within 1 million.
    1. +2
      20 August 2024 10: 15
      Quote: svan26
      The whole point is that there are no swivel wheels, CV joints, racks or worms. Two rear axles from Niva. On the steering wheel there are hydraulic system valves and two inexpensive hydraulic cylinders in the turning point

      Any malfunction of the hydraulic system (a hose broken by a piece of shrapnel, for example) - and the machine becomes completely uncontrollable. Plus, the articulation unit takes up about a quarter of the useful volume of the machine.

      A controversial decision, to be honest.

      Quote: svan26
      The whole point is that there are no swivel wheels, CV joints, racks or worms.

      So what's the point? All steering designs have been tested on thousands of car models; components are sold in any auto store.
  7. +1
    19 August 2024 17: 29
    geologists, foresters, mushrooms/hunting/fishing - why is everything interesting only for the Ministry of Defense? ;)
    1. 0
      21 August 2024 17: 54
      I made this transporter on the basis of our all-terrain vehicles, taking the best - an articulated frame in one plane, spring suspension, two rear axles from the Gazelle and an engine, gearbox and transfer case from the Niva. Tractor wheels Fbel-160m, tested in trophy. The steering is hydrostatic, MTZ. Everything is domestic, there is nothing homemade except the frame.
      The main thing here is reliability, then cross-country ability. Field repair possible.
  8. Owl
    +1
    19 August 2024 21: 10
    Unfortunately, there is no diesel...
  9. 0
    19 August 2024 21: 16
    Apparently, the “legs” of this project grow from niche small-scale manufacturers of tourist all-terrain vehicles, specializing in a specific “fracture” design.
    A fracture frame (in common parlance, a fracture frame) is a special type of vehicle design in which two half-frames are connected to each other by a rotary coupling device (or, as it is often called, a steering knuckle). This approach allows the all-terrain vehicle to literally break in half, which provides it with the following advantages:
    • smaller turning radius (the all-terrain vehicle can literally turn around its axis);
    • better balancing compared to a solid frame;
    • low risk of diagonal hanging (all four wheels are always on the ground and have excellent traction);
    • minimal risk of frame damage even with maximum body load and strong potholes;
    • uniform load distribution allows an all-terrain vehicle with a tipping frame to have greater power density, all other things being equal.
    Anyone interested will find more information on the Internet. The above are the advantages, but there are also a number of objective disadvantages.
  10. 0
    20 August 2024 06: 21
    It would be interesting to experiment:

    If you attach a towed gun to the rear compartment with drives for automatic transition to the combat/traveling position from the AZ for several shots
    and wherein
    If you place in the rear compartment a power plant for powering the gun's automation, a ammunition compartment with an AZ automatic reloader.

    This could turn out to be a very interesting version of Archer-type self-propelled guns
  11. 0
    20 August 2024 06: 28
    Quote: ROSS 42
    The idea of ​​​​creating it was taken from the appearance of a TPK born in 1975, produced in the Ukrainian SSR, taking into account modern requirements for protection and cross-country ability:

    these are fundamentally different designs (if we are talking about an articulated body).
    there is/was an articulated NIVA
  12. +1
    20 August 2024 08: 44
    "Plastun-TT" can accelerate to 100 km/h on the highway

    Are you crazy? An articulated all-terrain vehicle? The Belarus tractor has better handling.
    This plastun is a stillborn freak; they won’t even test him in Bronnitsy at the GABTU training ground. The more complex the more expensive, was it done according to this principle?
  13. 0
    20 August 2024 09: 50
    Quote: Maxim Davydov
    I think the business idea of ​​the manufacturer (for now only tracked vehicles) is to use the customer’s money to create (develop, test, launch into series...) a new model range (mini-Kirovets). This was the case with GAZ and the Tiger, for example.

    Damn, why Kirovets needs a broken frame is understandable; he needs to turn around in a limited space with towed equipment - a logical solution.
    It is not clear why the creators of this obscenity used a stainless steel joint and frame - what does this give?
    What are the advantages?
    The TPK, by the way, is a beast of a machine - an ideally thought-out and technologically advanced design for war - only the USSR knew how to do this.
    1. 0
      20 August 2024 10: 03
      Quote: Dozorny severa
      Damn, why does Kirovets need a broken frame? It’s clear he needs to turn around in a limited space

      Without the “breakable frame,” the Kirovets would not be able to turn at all - it has non-steering wheels.
  14. 0
    20 August 2024 10: 12
    Quote: DenVB
    Without the “breakable frame,” the Kirovets would not be able to turn at all - it has non-steering wheels.

    Did I write that he needs to make a turn by turning the wheels?
  15. 0
    21 August 2024 20: 58
    Quote: solomon
    An acquaintance of mine, Alexander Vlasov, died, brought TPKs to the DPR in 14 or 15, he dealt with them professionally, and said that it would not be suitable for military operations. There is a piece of his soul in this transporter; together we thought about what kind of car it should be.

    With all due respect to your deceased comrade, now there is nothing but a buggy and a Niva and an UAZ.
    And the term will not work - it’s not technical.
    We need a cheap vehicle ready for mass production.
    I know one thing - the proposed vehicle will be expensive, unreasonably complex and slow-moving.
    1. 0
      22 August 2024 07: 44
      Vlasov is known online as Fenix, he was an expert on Luazs and modernized them. I trust his opinion that TPK will not work for the current hostilities. TT is not complicated, not expensive, and not slow, just the opposite.
  16. 0
    22 August 2024 08: 04
    Quote: solomon
    Vlasov is known online as Fenix, he was an expert on Luazs and modernized them. I trust his opinion that TPK will not work for the current hostilities. TT is not complicated, not expensive, and not slow, just the opposite.

    The area of ​​faith does not belong to technology. How is it not slow, - I readily believe, - how fast is the turning speed - 5-8 km/h?
    I don’t need to write anything else—an ordinary pseudo-innovative sawing project.
  17. 0
    27 August 2024 23: 06
    A Niva motor driving a hundred miles along a highway on squirrels with a hydrostatic fracture is absolutely fantastic. If only in a straight line and downhill. And the body layout is generally slag, minus one passenger in the front and minus 20% of capacity due to a fracture. A Niva pickup with off-road capability will be much better than this miracle at a lower cost.
    1. 0
      31 August 2024 05: 03
      The chassis, suspension, and frame of this vehicle are designed for heavy impact loads. The Niva chassis will die under tractor tires and gullies at high speed.
      Everyone is clinging to the maximum, but for some reason no one sees the rest.
  18. 0
    5 September 2024 00: 41
    Depends on how much it costs. Otherwise they will ask for several times more than the Chinese one...