Anti-aircraft missile system "Pantsir-SMD-E" for combating UAVs

32 497 44
Anti-aircraft missile system "Pantsir-SMD-E" for combating UAVs
Module "Pantsir-SMD-E" at the forum "Army-2022"


The Russian defense industry has unveiled a new development - an anti-aircraft missile the Pantsir-SMD-E complex. This is an improved version of a well-known product, which has been optimized to solve specific tasks. Thanks to changes in equipment and weapons, the new SAM system should be more effective in combating unmanned aerial vehicles.



New sample


The Pantsir-S1 anti-aircraft missile and gun system was developed at the Tula Instrument Design Bureau (KBP), which is part of the High-Precision Complexes holding company of the Rostec state corporation. KBP continues to develop the original project and regularly demonstrates modifications to the complex.

Recently, at the Army-2024 military-technical forum, KBP presented a new development - the Pantsir-SMD-E anti-aircraft missile system. A full-size mock-up or prototype of this product was shown in the open area. They also revealed basic information about him.

Like the previous systems of the Pantsir family, the new complex is a means Defense short-range and is intended to protect important stationary objects or areas. At the same time, they focused on combating UAVs, including massive raids.

The new tasks led to a significant change in the original appearance of the complex. It lost artillery weapons, but received additional missiles. The combat vehicle's electronic equipment was also reworked.

It is not yet known at what stage the new project is at. Perhaps he has already reached the point of building a prototype, which was shown at Army 2024. If tests have not yet been carried out, they may begin soon.


Side view

It is worth noting that the letter “E” in the index of the air defense system presented at the exhibition indicates its export version. This means that KBP, High-Precision Complexes and Rostec are counting on orders from both the Russian army and foreign countries.

In a modified form


At the Army-2024 forum, the new air defense system was shown as a separate combat module. It can be installed on different chassis or stationary bases. The resulting “Pantsir-SMD-E” is similar to previous versions of the air defense missile system, but has a number of significant differences.

The combat module is assembled on a frame on which the base of the rotating turret and the power compartment are located.

The main equipment of the air defense system is located on a rotating turret. A fixed target tracking radar antenna is installed in the front of the turret. On the roof at the stern there is a rotating target detection radar antenna. On the sides of the tower there are missile launchers.

The target detection radar is equipped with an active phased array antenna and provides all-round visibility with large elevation angles. It is capable of detecting various air targets over a wide range of ranges. For example, for an object with an EPR of 1 sq. m. detection range is 45 km. Up to 40 targets can be processed simultaneously.

The second radar is responsible for tracking targets and controlling the launched missile. Its operating range is shorter than that of a detection radar, but exceeds the firing range of missiles.


From the previous Pantsirs, the new SMD-E modification received the 57E6-E anti-aircraft guided missile - a two-stage solid fuel munition with a radio command control system. Its launch range is 20 km, the destruction height is up to 15 km.

The TKB-1055 anti-aircraft guided missile was previously created for the Pantsir-SM air defense missile system. It is characterized by reduced size, weight and flight characteristics. The missile is designed to intercept small air targets, such as Drones. Its range is up to 7 km, and the height of destruction is up to 5 km.

Two Pantsir-SMD-E launchers have space for 12 transport and launch containers with missiles. Larger missiles of the 57E6-E type are placed in the TPK one at a time, and for the TKB-1055 four-person containers with the same dimensions have been created.

The development organization reports that the air defense system's ammunition can include two types of missiles in any combination. Depending on the perceived threats, the launchers can accommodate up to 12 longer-range 57E6-E products or up to 48 TKB-1055 anti-drone products.

Based on experience


The Pantsir-S1 air defense missile system of the first version was put into service quite a long time ago and during its service it showed its best performance. Subsequently, the original project was developed, which resulted in new modifications with their own characteristics and capabilities.

The emergence of a new threat in the form of UAVs of various classes led to the launch of the development of improved versions of air defense systems. Thus, a few years ago, a modernized Pantsir-SM air defense missile system was presented, equipped with improved electronic equipment. Later, a small-sized missile defense system appeared specifically for combating UAVs.


Rear part of the launcher and TPK with missiles

Now Rostec and KBP are presenting another version of the short-range anti-aircraft system. "Pantsir-SMD-E" retains the general architectural solutions of its predecessors, but has new electronics with maximum characteristics.

The Pantsir-SMD-E differs in its armament configuration. The pair of 30mm cannons was eliminated due to their limited firepower, and the new TKB-1055 missiles were fully integrated in their place.

The main advantages of Pantsir-SMD-E are associated precisely with the use of a new small-sized rocket in combination with the existing 57E6-E. The TKB-1055 product is superior to 30-mm guns in its main characteristics, and is also cheaper than a full-size missile defense system. In addition, the small dimensions of the rocket made it possible to obtain a record ammunition load.

The latest version of the Pantsir, with two types of missiles, is capable of more effectively fighting UAVs. Its large ammunition load allows it to repel even massive raids. At the same time, basic capabilities in the context of air defense are successfully preserved.

The execution of an experimental or mock-up complex for the Army 2022 forum is of interest. Such a combat module can be installed permanently or on a chassis. Different installation options may be of interest to both the armed forces and other structures, including foreign ones.


Serial air defense missile system "Pantsir-S1"

In general, the new Pantsir-SMD-E anti-aircraft missile system was the result of the systematic development of the existing family of equipment in a changing environment and the emergence of new threats. By maintaining some solutions and introducing others, as well as using new components, it was again possible to obtain an air defense system with improved combat capabilities.

Great future


The Pantsir missile and gun systems of previous versions have long and firmly taken their place in the domestic air defense system. They are responsible for covering various territories and protecting other types of air defense systems. In addition, these air defense missile systems were used in real military conflicts.

Experience shows that the technical potential of the Pantsir has not yet been fully realized. Development companies take this into account and create new versions with different design features and characteristic combat capabilities.

This year, Rostec and its enterprises presented another version of the anti-aircraft system, this time with improved anti-UAV capabilities. We can expect that the new Pantsir-SMD-E air defense system will pass all the necessary tests, and the army will accept it into service. History "Shell" will continue to benefit our air defense.
44 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +6
    15 August 2024 05: 42
    Also interesting is the modularity of the new Pantsir, where the control cabin (in this case, a protected laptop) is located separately from the combat module.
    This allows
    1) Remove the crew from the attack
    2) Use a regular Mi-8 to deliver the module to towers/roofs of buildings
    3) Use premises with existing life support infrastructure for personnel
    1. +1
      16 August 2024 19: 23
      Quote: keleg
      Also interesting is the modularity of the new Pantsir, where the control cabin (in this case, a protected laptop) is located separately from the combat module.

      Such modules can be used to build area air defense of industrial facilities, populated areas, military aviation airfields and administrative centers. The abandonment of guns has seriously simplified, reduced the cost and reduced the weight of the module, without at all reducing its effectiveness, and this should reduce the production cycle time and increase the production rate. The “Pantsir” in this air defense system has proven itself above all praise, and its missile defense system, due to radio command guidance, does not have any seeker except a radio fuse. Therefore, with such high efficiency, this is the simplest and cheapest missile defense system and can be produced quickly, on a huge scale and very inexpensively.
      1. +2
        19 August 2024 11: 29
        Have already done.
        Just a 10-15 meter tower. At the top is a combat module, at the bottom is a container with crews and related equipment.
  2. -3
    15 August 2024 08: 31
    We are strange people, we love to deceive ourselves and enjoy self-deception. Like children... Now there are multi-engine UAVs that fly in forests and at the level of tree crowns. What will this Pantsir do? The RCS of some models of air attack and reconnaissance systems (calculated) is less than 0,01 sq.m. And how does this complex plan to see it? Large ammunition? Where did you see it, author? And what, will each squad of soldiers be assigned such a complex? And what, will it see against the background of forests, mountains or buildings? Is the enemy an idiot? Reality shows that no. There are no idiots there. It seems that they have all gathered here. Once again, the physics that underlies the radar principle of navigation/detection/guidance does NOT allow determining the coordinates of an air object with an accuracy higher than 3-5 degrees in azimuth/elevation coordinates (regardless of the nationality of the developer and state affiliation). The problem of selecting a target and plotting its trajectory is not being solved. The means of destruction is a missile. A separate conversation. Well, and the visibility of the complex itself. Like a New Year's tree at night... The degradation of our military-industrial complex is obvious. Solid fantasies. But the most interesting thing is that it is impossible to reach the heads of the leaders. Nobody needs anything
    1. +3
      15 August 2024 08: 49
      And what will Shell guard in the forest?
      1. -3
        15 August 2024 12: 29
        Do you really not understand or are you kidding? If you are kidding, then get out of here. If you do not understand, then I will explain: the enemy uses every opportunity to bring an air strike to the object of destruction (target). For this, both terrain folds and half-destroyed buildings are used. They are used both as a background environment and as passage channels to the place of target destruction. Today, due to the lack of effective means of countering the use of small-sized multi-engine UAVs, their massive use has begun on the front lines. What to shoot them down with? Nothing. There is nothing except chatter and showing off. And what will Pantsir do at a distance of 10 km from the LBS? Why is it needed there? Talk to those who are in the trenches ... for every normal word there will be 10 swear words ... Effective means of cover were developed back in 2016. They could operate in passive mode up to MDV = 3 km, at a radius of up to 20 km, the capacity of tracking channels was 1,5 million objects with an update step of 0,01 s. Worked against any background. The probability of defeat was not lower than 0,92. But it turned out that no one needed it. They went to officials and our military leaders, like prostitutes, and offered. No. Nobody needed it. The answer was: an unmanned vehicle is not a threat, and you are all dreamers. Although experimental testing was carried out and the results were confirmed. The enterprise was closed. The buildings were demolished. Now there is a residential complex there. The team is lost - food in stores is not given under a cross. And now Pantsir, with three missiles ... Another breakthrough ...
        1. 0
          15 August 2024 22: 47
          Quote: RVlad
          Effective means of cover were developed back in 2016. They could operate in passive mode up to MDV = 3 km, at a radius of up to 20 km, the capacity of tracking channels was 1,5 million objects with an update step of 0,01 s. Worked on any background.

          And what is this remedy?
          Quote: RVlad
          The probability of defeat is not lower than 0,92.

          What means of destruction?
        2. +2
          19 August 2024 11: 47
          Well, I'll please you a little
          Air defense is not just one air defense system, it is a system.
          The task of the Shell is to cover stationary objects.
          And towers with Pantsir modules are already being built across the country.
          The answer was: unmanned aircraft are not a threat, but you are all dreamers. - this is unfortunately the bitter truth. the warriors did not understand the meaning of small drones.
          [media=https://yandex.ru/video/preview/2686645128179288280]
          This was shown just recently - but we have zero attention.

          I myself, having seen an advertisement for an unmanned aircraft, showed it to several colonels, and only one of them, a border guard, thought about it. I simply said - load this plane with 10 kg (of explosives, drugs, contraband, etc.) and launch it across the border at an altitude of 10 meters, and it will fly 20 km and meet it there. This was 2010.
          Then I saw this
          [media = https: //vk.com/video-146612389_456239027]
          and the first thought was - cool and cool, and the second thought - so you can attach half a kilo of explosives to a UAV and use it against a diesel locomotive, almost partisan actions, and the third thought - so you can not just hit a diesel locomotive, you can hit anything With such a drone, you can stick more than half a kilo of explosives, it doesn’t have to be TNT, you can stick it more powerfully.

          Again I showed it to the colonels - well, yes, these are all toys.
    2. AMG
      0
      15 August 2024 10: 53
      This is not a complex for use on the front line, it may not even be self-propelled. In this form, it can be used for air defense of large objects (airfields, factories, etc.) by installing it on masts. A kind of air defense tower.
      1. -4
        15 August 2024 12: 32
        Well, yes, put it on every toilet in the courtyards...
        1. AMG
          -1
          15 August 2024 12: 43
          I couldn’t come up with anything smarter...Oh, how I want to leave a comment.
          1. 0
            15 August 2024 13: 57
            Leave me, what are the problems?
        2. +1
          15 August 2024 14: 00
          But not emotional chatter, but with numbers. To make your train of thought clear... If you haven’t evaluated it, then take E.S.’s book. Wentzel "Theory of Probability", "Anti-Aircraft Combat" by F. Neupokoev, add a book on the principles of radar operation (whichever one you like) and carry out an analysis... I think that the result of this assessment will remove any unfounded optimism from you... and you will understand why about toilet... Good luck
          1. AMG
            -2
            15 August 2024 14: 42
            In the next article on this topic, the author calls the complex a "defender of oil depots." Is he wrong? And you want to install it on the toilet that you sometimes visit and read complicated books about forests, tree crowns and the basics of the radar principle, whether navigation, detection or guidance. How many readers do you think your long, convoluted comments are?
            1. 0
              15 August 2024 16: 27
              look here: https://t.me/TolkoPoDely/33470
              1. AMG
                -1
                15 August 2024 16: 34
                So what? What is this about? What does this mean?
            2. +2
              15 August 2024 16: 30
              I have a video (where a Ukrainian UAV strikes an oil refinery). Calmly and unhindered. It's going between the mountains. And the Pantsir (and it was there) doesn't see it, for obvious reasons. And the same story happened in Khmeimim. I asked you: no emotional chatter.
              1. -2
                15 August 2024 22: 56
                Quote: RVlad
                I have a video (of a Ukrainian UAV striking an oil refinery). Calm and unobstructed. It goes between the mountains. But the Shell (and he was there) does not see him, for obvious reasons.

                So is your mysterious system:
                Quote: RVlad
                The probability of defeat is not lower than 0,92.

                That is, on average, out of 13 cases of using your mysterious system, 1 (one) will be:
                Quote: RVlad
                ...video (where a Krajina UAV strikes an oil refinery). Calm and unobstructed. It goes between the mountains.
                and your mysterious system will not accept it.
            3. +1
              15 August 2024 16: 33
              you are also illiterate and infinitely far from the topic
              1. AMG
                0
                15 August 2024 16: 55
                We are all illiterate sometimes, especially if we start writing a sentence with a small letter. The website you presented offers to watch a soldier deflect a drone with his head. So I am writing, what is this about? Now explain why radars were previously installed on artificial hills, and then they began to be placed on masts, as in the S-300 complexes, etc.? And why can't the presented equipment be used for air defense of factories?
                1. -1
                  15 August 2024 19: 45
                  Let's stop discussing this topic - I don't want to waste my time on educational programs. I sent you a video with a hero soldier so that you understand: if this happens, it means we do not control the airspace at all. Nothing. This should never happen, ever. It's the same story with factories. I told you what books to read and the questions will disappear on their own... good luck
                  1. AMG
                    -2
                    15 August 2024 23: 15
                    This topic is topical now and it is not the time to stop discussing it. If you have read smart books, sat on some commissions, can say something specific, then say it simply and specifically. And then 2016, effective means of covering up, what? Passive mode, capacity of support channels with an update step. And then more. They walked like prostitutes, buildings were demolished, products under the cross! My heart is breaking from such words. Spend your time, free your soul!
    3. 0
      15 August 2024 22: 44
      Quote: RVlad
      Nowadays, multi-propelled UAVs have already appeared that fly in forests and at the level of tree crowns. What will this Pantsir do?

      The shell will detect. The object is either moving or its blades are rotating, which distinguishes it from the crowns of trees.
      Quote: RVlad
      The EPR of some types of air attack and reconnaissance means (calculated) is less than 0,01 sq.m.

      What about the real EPR? For example, what is the real ESR of the DJI Phantom?
      Quote: RVlad
      Once again, the physics that underlies the radar principle of navigation/detection/guidance does NOT allow us to determine the coordinates of an airborne object with an accuracy greater than 3-5 degrees in azimuth/elevation coordinates

      Angular accuracy 3-5 degrees? And what will the linear accuracy, for example, be at a range of 10 km then? How then do S-75, S-125, Osa, Thor, Pantsir hit targets?
      Quote: RVlad
      The problem of selecting a target and constructing its trajectory of movement is not solved.

      How then do air defense systems with TU-1 hit targets? How then is the preemptive meeting point of the missile defense system with the target in any air defense system determined?
    4. 0
      30 August 2024 16: 31
      1) In addition to the radar, Pantsir has an OLS
      2) The visibility of the complex for its tasks (protection of stationary objects) is not important.
    5. The comment was deleted.
  3. +2
    15 August 2024 09: 22
    You'll get the hang of the zurs for the Pantsir air defense system! I tried it! I know for sure that neither half a liter nor a liter is enough! Simply, I will give the names of the Zurs that I come across on the Internet! So: .57E6/ 57E6E/ 57E6M/57E6M-E/95Y6/95Y6E/95Y6SM/23Y6/19Y6...and don’t forget the “primary” 9M335! So what's better drinks and "forget" about it!
  4. +1
    15 August 2024 09: 49
    He lost his artillery weapons, but received additional missiles.
    Amazing, but can they do the opposite? That is, remove the missiles, leave the guns, increase the ammunition load of shells several times and use a fuse with remote detonation, with the detonation distance set remotely
    1. +1
      15 August 2024 10: 48
      Quote: svp67
      Amazing, but can they do it on the side?

      What about fig? belay And why? stop MZA is a close combat weapon and cannot replace longer-range and "high-altitude" ZURs! And it is not a VTO! negative
      1. +1
        15 August 2024 15: 06
        Quote: Nikolaevich I
        What about fig?

        Because you shouldn’t forget about the ECONOMY. Any shells are tens or even hundreds of times cheaper than missiles
        Quote: Nikolaevich I
        And why?

        To create a strong object near air defense zone
        Quote: Nikolaevich I
        MZA is a melee weapon and cannot replace longer-range and “high-altitude” zurs!

        Each has its own purpose. Moreover, the ammunition supply of shells can be made very significant in a stationary installation
        Quote: Nikolaevich I
        And the WTO is not!

        When using appropriate sighting and command devices, when the fires of several such installations can be controlled from a single center, this is still the case. The 30-mm Pantsir cannons are very accurate weapons, and if you also use shells with a programmable fuse, then the cloud of fragments and blast wave they create will destroy any UAV with a guarantee
        1. +1
          15 August 2024 15: 45
          and if, in addition to these complexes, we develop smaller platform-container turret installations. Take a 2A42 gun, but install an automatic detonation programmer. Use ME shells, but need a new fuse installer. There will be an explosion during approach, 2g of PE will fly forward in a cone. The moment of detonation (calculation and installation of the fuse) is determined by the automatic control system. And since the gun is powered by 2 belts in the second box, there are ordinary OFZ shells, in case of a strong target. You can also install a couple of packages of small missiles on a turret like this.
        2. 0
          15 August 2024 18: 35
          Quote: svp67
          Because you shouldn’t forget about the ECONOMY. Any shells are tens or even hundreds of times cheaper than missiles

          Alas! Such savings in our time will most likely turn out to be apparent! Just like the "savings" on 152-mm shells! If you turn on your "brain" and calculate everything, then the cost of hitting a target with conventional shells will turn out to be more than, for example, with "Krasnopol"! You said it without thinking and without calculating! And in vain!
        3. 0
          15 August 2024 18: 51
          Unfortunately, I have problems with the Internet... (I'm at the dacha, and here the Internet is sometimes there, sometimes not!) But I see that your conclusions, in a certain sense, are "far-fetched"! If not "an owl on a globe"; then certainly "a condom on a sparrow"
    2. 0
      15 August 2024 23: 00
      Quote: svp67
      Amazing, but can they do it on the side? That is, remove the missiles, leave the guns, increase the ammunition load of shells several times and use a fuse with remote detonation, with the detonation distance set remotely

      Then you will have to significantly increase the number of complexes to protect the same area.
      1. +1
        16 August 2024 05: 28
        Quote: Comet
        Then you will have to significantly increase the number of complexes to protect the same area.

        Do you have accurate calculations?
        1. +1
          16 August 2024 15: 22
          Yes, and it's simple. Look at the effective range of guns and missiles.
          1. +1
            16 August 2024 17: 32
            Quote: keleg
            Yes, and it's simple. Look at the effective range of guns and missiles.

            A simple range measurement doesn't tell you anything. An air target can approach its target at an extremely low altitude and its detection range will be at the minimum limit, and here the speed of the anti-aircraft system must play a role. And in any case, anti-aircraft gunners calculate the consumption of two missiles per target, since the probability of their hit is not equal to “1”, that is, 100%...
        2. The comment was deleted.
        3. -1
          19 August 2024 19: 46
          Quote: svp67
          Quote: Comet

          Then you will have to significantly increase the number of complexes to protect the same area.

          Do you have accurate calculations?

          Guns don't like targets with high parameters.
    3. +1
      19 August 2024 12: 06
      There are no shells with remote detonation.
      1. 0
        19 August 2024 13: 21
        Quote: Evgesha
        There are no shells with remote detonation.

        What about shrapnel? Tank complex "Ainet"
  5. +1
    15 August 2024 12: 34
    Or maybe these developments can be used to modernize the Tunguska? After all, it is there... during major repairs, update it. For cover on the front
    1. 0
      15 August 2024 15: 08
      Quote: rosomaha
      For cover on the front

      "Tunguska" without its 30 mm cannons on the front??????? It is unlikely that the commanders will be “pleased”.
      1. 0
        15 August 2024 15: 32
        I wrote about the use of developments on the Pantsir...its elements can be used for moderating the Tunguska radar, EPS, medium-range communications, and new missiles. The guns remain.
        1. 0
          16 August 2024 03: 56
          Well, you get "Pantsir-SM-SV".
  6. 0
    16 August 2024 17: 47
    It was in vain that they abandoned the guns; after all, their ammunition is significant for self-defense from ground and air enemies, and you cannot fire an air defense missile at the ground. request what
  7. 0
    4 September 2024 05: 24
    The pair of 30-mm guns were abandoned due to their limited fire characteristics, and new TKB-1055 missiles were fully implemented in their place.


    Apparently, we should expect the development of the Pantsir and the emergence of machine gun-gun systems working in conjunction with missile systems. It is unlikely that missiles are capable of operating effectively at close ranges. Consequently, the emergence of protective weapons for the system itself is inevitable where they are needed.