Su-35S: features of the Russian 4++ generation fighter

27
Su-35S: features of the Russian 4++ generation fighter

The Su-35S is a Russian multi-role super-maneuverable fighter of the 4++ generation, created on the basis of the Su-27, but significantly superior to it in its characteristics. In fact, this winged vehicle is an “intermediate option” between the Su-27 and Su-57.

The fighter was designed to perform a wide range of missions, including air superiority, destruction of ground and sea targets, and electronic warfare. One of the key features of the Su-35S is its ability to fight at long and short ranges, which makes it a versatile tool in modern conflicts.



It’s worth starting with the fact that the Su-35S is equipped with advanced engines with thrust vector control (TCV). The AL-41F1S power plant provides the aircraft not only with a high thrust-to-weight ratio, but also with the possibility of prolonged supersonic flight without the use of afterburner, which is an important advantage in air combat. This ability makes the Su-35S one of the most maneuverable fighters in the world, capable of successfully countering even more modern aircraft.

Another feature of the winged vehicle is its onboard radio-electronic system, which includes a powerful Irbis-E radar station. This phased array radar is capable of detecting targets at a distance of up to 400 kilometers and tracking up to 30 targets simultaneously, giving the Su-35S a significant advantage in detecting and destroying the enemy before he can engage in combat. The aircraft is also equipped with an optical location system that allows it to detect targets in low visibility conditions using infrared radiation.

On weapons, the fighter can carry a wide range of guided and unguided weapons, including missiles air-to-air and air-to-surface class. To destroy air targets, the fighter uses R-77 and R-27 missiles, and to hit ground and sea targets - Kh-29, Kh-31 and other missiles. The Su-35S can also use guided bombs and standard bombs of various calibers. In turn, the 30-mm GSh-30-1 cannon is designed for close air combat and the destruction of lightly armored ground targets.

The Su-35S is also equipped with a modern electronic warfare system "Khibiny", which significantly increases its survivability in combat conditions. This system is capable of effectively counteracting enemy radar detection and guidance systems by creating false targets and suppressing enemy signals. Combined with high maneuverability and a low-observable profile, this fighter becomes an extremely difficult target for enemy missiles and systems. Defense.

Finally, a distinctive feature of the Su-35S is also its ability to integrate into modern network warfare systems (the so-called network-centric warfare). This means that the fighter can effectively interact with other aircraft, ground and sea units, exchanging data in real time.

In general, the Su-35S is not just a modernized version of the Su-27, but a fundamentally new fighter that incorporates advanced technologies that provide it with superiority in modern air combat. High maneuverability, powerful weapons and modern detection and protection systems make it one of the best combat aircraft in its class, capable of successfully performing a wide range of missions in various conditions.


27 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +2
    13 August 2024 17: 34
    I think this is the best fighter in the world, it’s a pity that the production rate is not too high.
  2. -10
    13 August 2024 17: 45
    In general, the Su-35S is not just a modernized version of the Su-27, but a fundamentally new fighter that incorporates advanced technologies that provide it with superiority in modern air combat.

    Or maybe the Su-35S (4++++++++++++++++) can take down an American reconnaissance drone without using either missiles or a gun on it? Does he have a set of EMP guns - an analogue of the same “Alabuga” that disables all electronics at a distance of up to 10 km?
    Then there would be no price for him...
  3. +3
    13 August 2024 18: 06
    The author has forgotten about the R-37. And this is a superweapon. Well, and also the R-73. And of course bombs with a correction module.
    1. 0
      14 August 2024 00: 30
      The author did not forget, he did not know
  4. 0
    13 August 2024 18: 16
    Quote: ROSS 42
    In general, the Su-35S is not just a modernized version of the Su-27, but a fundamentally new fighter that incorporates advanced technologies that provide it with superiority in modern air combat.

    Or maybe the Su-35S (4++++++++++++++++) can take down an American reconnaissance drone without using either missiles or a gun on it? Does he have a set of EMP guns - an analogue of the same “Alabuga” that disables all electronics at a distance of up to 10 km?
    Then there would be no price for him...

    Now, if you were silent more, then you would look much smarter. Moreover, this is easier to do than what you suggest.
  5. -6
    13 August 2024 18: 19
    Quote: Glagol1
    The author has forgotten about the R-37. And this is a superweapon. Well, and also the R-73. And of course bombs with a correction module.

    And Amer’s aim-174, that’s just baby talk, right?
    1. +3
      13 August 2024 18: 43
      Right


      Because there is nothing more to comment on.
      1. -10
        13 August 2024 18: 45
        A range of 400 km is bullshit. Whether it’s our 360. It’s ours, which means it’s a priori better - generally a classic.
        1. +1
          13 August 2024 18: 57
          The snow leopard detects aim 174 at a distance of at least 170-180 km, and interception is provided by the same P37 and P77, including at distances less than 100 km.
        2. -1
          13 August 2024 19: 17
          Quote from Nesvoy
          A range of 400 km is bullshit. Whether it’s our 360. It’s ours, which means it’s a priori better - generally a classic.

          But how will a missile find a target at such a distance? And this is where it comes into play main advantage of SM-6; The missile is completely network-centric, designed to interact with the combat information space (English battlespace) of the US Navy. It can directly receive target position data supplied by ships with the Aegis system, ships and aircraft with other compatible BIUS, as well as E-2D Hawkeye AWACS aircraft. Developed by Raytheon (manufacturer of the entire Standard family), a dual-frequency data exchange channel provides the missile with the ability to interact with different types of radars and digital communication systems in service with the United States and NATO.

          Let’s say such a missile is hung on one of the F-16s that arrived in Ukraine,
          what's next ?
          1. +3
            14 August 2024 09: 03
            Let’s say such a missile is hung on one of the F-16s that arrived in Ukraine,
            what's next ?
            But nothing!!! Who will give this F-16 with 174 in Ukraine this very “combat information space”??? An AWACS aircraft that will hover in Poland or Romania, and from which the front line will be beyond the radio horizon? Or will they launch these AWACS in front of the fighter, substituting them for fighters or air defense, but at the same time gaining the opportunity to shoot 400 km??? And by the time the F-16’s own radar sees something, it itself will already be under fire!
            1. +1
              14 August 2024 10: 26
              Quote: Bad_gr
              Let’s say such a missile is hung on one of the F-16s that arrived in Ukraine,
              what's next ?

              Quote: Hexenmeister
              But nothing!!! Who will give this F-16 with 174 in Ukraine this very “combat information space”???

              That's what I pay attention to. If our fighter, having launched a missile, controls it from the moment of launch until it hits the target, then the American one, without auxiliary crutches, such as AWACS aircraft, is completely useless when firing at long ranges.
              1. +1
                14 August 2024 10: 48
                What I pay attention to
                Everything is correct! Only here you still need to understand that the transmission of radio correction signals, which we use, is the “creation of a combat information field” in American terminology, only from a fighter aircraft.. Only a fighter that has launched a missile can perform this action easier than an AWACS aircraft, since the latter conducts a circular search, there will be questions about the rate of information updating, and the information needs to be emitted precisely in the direction of the missile; non-directional “circular” radiation will require high power costs at high launch ranges. An interesting technical point for the 174th rocket, if you believe what is written about it, is the use of a global positioning system, rather than an inertial system, to eliminate the accumulation of errors in the latter. For our 37M, this was solved, it seems, by other methods.
            2. +1
              14 August 2024 11: 09
              On my own behalf, I would like to add that you also need to understand from what height a missile must be launched so that it hits a target at a distance of 400 km, 12000 - 14000 meters. The surveillance radars of our air defense systems will detect it at a distance of 500 - 600 km.
              1. +1
                14 August 2024 11: 51
                12000 - 14000 meters
                Or maybe more, and the target should be high altitude, and the carrier and target should be supersonic, it seems to me so...
          2. 0
            14 August 2024 22: 27
            Well, they have such a rocket, and then what? There is also an anti-missile maneuver, there are also anti-missiles, and then what? Should we quickly retreat and shout not to hit the man lying down? Don't cause panic, alarmist. Sit and chew chips, they'll sort it out without you. And then, listening to people like this, all the vandals think that it’s time to call in UFOs. Our MiG-16SMT will deal with the Fu-29m without any problems. And the SU-35S is not a headache at all. Otherwise we are used to looking beyond the horizon and praising it, but our gold is being trampled underfoot.
            1. 0
              15 August 2024 00: 29
              Quote: forester
              Well, they have such a rocket, and then what?
              It seems my text is too complicated for you. There, just below, I presented the text a little simpler, read it, maybe the meaning of what was said will still reach you.
        3. 0
          26 August 2024 06: 15
          No one in real life launches rockets either three hundred or two hundred km
  6. -3
    13 August 2024 19: 00
    Quote: Rus_80
    The snow leopard detects aim 174 at a distance of at least 170-180 km, and interception is provided by the same P37 and P77, including at distances less than 100 km.

    Proof of detecting this missile from a distance of 180 km. And secondly, what prevents American missiles from intercepting our missiles?
    1. 0
      13 August 2024 19: 54
      When 174 is 100 km away from the MIG, the plane from which it was fired will already hide and there will simply be no one to fire missiles against our missiles. And even if they release it, then during the approach of 174 and 77 it will be another 300 km from the meeting point of the first missiles. Pure geometry if the speeds of the rockets are approximately equal. and if they differ greatly, then the numbers will change, but the repeated rocket will be late for the rendezvous for the duration of the 200+ km flight. Chaotic, tired, too lazy to formulate beautifully.
      1. 0
        14 August 2024 00: 35
        Don’t formulate it, because you didn’t understand the question. I think the person asked, “Can the Amers also shoot down our missiles fired at them?” Is that clear?
  7. 0
    14 August 2024 19: 53
    how many of them were shot down in Ukraine, including by friendly fire?
  8. +1
    14 August 2024 19: 55
    Question for experts to answer - when will the 4+++ plane appear?
    1. 0
      15 August 2024 09: 13
      when will the 4+++ plane appear?
      What are the differences between “three pluses” and “two pluses” or “one plus”??? Will cockpit displays finally be secured with emerald-colored and varnished screws?
  9. 0
    19 August 2024 14: 13
    Who knows for sure whether the Su-35 can carry the KAB-3000?
    If it can, why then the Su-34 or are there still some nuances such as the landing gear being rather weak or the space for the KAB-3000 suspension not being enough....
  10. 0
    19 August 2024 19: 22
    Soon they will teach you to independently select targets, maneuvers, choose weapons depending on the situation, and at the limit no one will want to argue with such weapons...
  11. 0
    23 September 2024 15: 30
    My opinion is that the Chinese comrades have made a much more modern aircraft from the Su-27, in addition to the engine, namely a composite airframe, modern avionics and airborne equipment, that's where we need to go.