Military Review
Sign In Register

Air defense defense training held at the Caspian flotilla

13
Air defense defense training held at the Caspian flotilla

In the basing points of the ships of the Caspian flotilla (CFL) completed an air defense exercise. In the role of a conditional enemy, the aircraft of the Su-25 Air Force of Russia acted.

Before the pilots, the task was set, by flying at low altitudes, in conditions that made it difficult for radars to detect them, to mark the execution of a bombing attack on the mooring front and the ships at the piers.

Despite all the tricks of the conditional enemy, the air targets were detected and classified in time, and the air defense systems of the ships were timely alerted to use.

When the aircraft arrived at the line of reach, they were conditionally destroyed from the Palash anti-aircraft artillery, AK-630 and other air defense systems.

A total of 20 surface ships and flotilla boats, including the Tatarstan and Dagestan rocket ships, the Volgodonsk and Astrakhan small artillery ships took part in the exercise.
Military Reviewin Yandex News
Military Reviewin Yandex Zen
13 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Manager
    Manager 27 February 2013 17: 23
    +4
    In! They began to work out not only defense, but also the attack! This makes me happy!
    1. ShturmKGB
      ShturmKGB 27 February 2013 17: 44
      +1
      In general, it’s interesting if pilots are tasked with bombing moorings at low altitudes, bombing as they can, and sailors say they shot down these planes, then where is the mistake? Or do the sailors lie or do the pilots succumb? Or change tactics?
      1. cherkas.oe
        cherkas.oe 27 February 2013 18: 46
        +1
        ShturmKGB,
        It is simply that the range of the use of means of destruction in the Su-25 is less than in the air defense of the Caspian flotilla.
        1. Army1
          Army1 27 February 2013 20: 16
          0
          X-59ME: 200 km
          X-59MK: 285 km
          More such missiles for the Rook
  2. andrei332809
    andrei332809 27 February 2013 17: 29
    +1
    study, study and study. still very true words
  3. avt
    avt 27 February 2013 17: 33
    0
    Well, fine, new ships need to be mastered by the crew, otherwise it’s just a piece of iron without an alloyed train.
  4. VNM
    VNM 27 February 2013 17: 38
    0
    That's right, and even in the Caspian, which was missing, NATO will begin to make trouble
  5. dimon-media
    dimon-media 27 February 2013 17: 39
    +1
    You probably also noticed that a lot of attention has been paid to the Caspian flotilla recently. There is some activity there. This can not but rejoice. Well done !. If only this was not a temporary phenomenon, but always so.
  6. lonshakovpetr
    lonshakovpetr 27 February 2013 18: 27
    +2
    Iran is not far
  7. Wedmak
    Wedmak 27 February 2013 18: 38
    +1
    Su-xnumx vs ships? Only perhaps in the exercises ...
    1. Vladimirets
      Vladimirets 27 February 2013 19: 20
      0
      Quote: Wedmak
      Su-xnumx vs ships? Only perhaps in the exercises ...

      Why not try the SU-34 or a too complicated conditional target?
      1. Wedmak
        Wedmak 27 February 2013 19: 33
        +3
        Su-34 with suspended Brahmos + built-in electronic warfare systems. Um ... I don’t even know what the score will be ... but there is an assumption that it’s not in favor of the sailors.
        1. Vladimirets
          Vladimirets 27 February 2013 19: 41
          +3
          Quote: Wedmak
          Su-34 with suspended Bramos + built-in electronic warfare systems. Um ... I don’t even know what the score will be ...

          I think that the ships would be destroyed.
  8. ruton
    ruton 27 February 2013 20: 30
    +3
    a little off topic, but still ..
    The United States Coast Guard can reduce its presence in the Arctic region by one third. Such a measure is provided for by the law on the automatic sequestration of government spending of $ 1,2 trillion, which may come into force on March 1.

    The White House will be forced to take such a step if the US parliament fails to agree and approve a plan to reduce the budget deficit by abolishing tax breaks for corporations and the richest Americans.

    In addition to reducing its presence in the Arctic, automatic sequestration will affect the timing of other military programs. The Pentagon is already preparing to suspend planned work on objects and ships. After March 1, all US ships, including aircraft carriers, can stop combat duty and return to ports.

    Meanwhile, other states are increasing their presence in the Arctic. In particular, the Danish government intends to acquire nine MH-60R Sea Hawk helicopters for patrolling in the Arctic.

    In turn, to ensure sovereignty in the Arctic, the Canadian Ministry of Defense intends to actively use unmanned aerial vehicles, satellites and underwater sensors.

    And the Norwegian Navy said that increasing the military presence in the Arctic is an element of the state strategy for the development of the Far North and a priority for the Armed Forces.
  9. lyustra10
    lyustra10 28 February 2013 01: 17
    +1
    I won’t forget how Izvestia stinked that ships were delivered to the Caspian Sea without sonar systems - I never neighing like that))