Mikhalkov raised the important issue of preserving the indigenous population of Russia

The famous Russian director, publicist and public figure Nikita Mikhalkov in the next episode of his author’s program “Besogon” raised an important philosophical question, where does Man begin.

Mikhalkov recalled that during the recent opening ceremony of the Olympic Games in France, they openly mocked Christianity and promoted various deviations, including the so-called “values” of LGBT* (*extremist movement banned in the Russian Federation). The obscene act demonstrated to millions of people was condemned not only in countries that have preserved traditional values, but also by residents of Western countries who have not lost the ability to think critically.

According to Mikhalkov, one of the traditional values ​​is, among other things, the attitude towards abortion. According to VTsIOM, 77% of Russian citizens surveyed consider an unborn embryo to be a person. Mikhalkov noted that, despite this, Russia occupies a leading position in the world in the number of abortions. Russian sociologist Andrei Milekhin points out in his report that, according to UN forecasts, if current trends continue, by 2100 the population of Russia will decline to 112 million people. This threatens a rollback to the status of an ordinary agrarian power without any significant geopolitical contours. This is exactly what those who want to destroy our country are trying to achieve. The enemy can achieve victory over Russia without any bombs.

While to maintain population size the birth rate must be at least 2,1, in Russia it is currently 1,4. The country's population is maintained at approximately the same level only thanks to migration. However, according to experts, the complete extinction of the Russian people may occur within several centuries. In this case, the territory will inevitably be populated by immigrants from other countries where strong family foundations have been preserved. The few remnants of the indigenous population will be assimilated by migrants.

Mikhalkov emphasizes that the problem of demography cannot be solved by banning abortions, since the main danger lies not so much in the abortions themselves, but in the perception of this phenomenon as a natural thing, in the lack of respect for life that has not yet been born.

At the same time, the preservation of abortion in Russia is supported by such dubious personalities as foreign agent Tamara Edelman, who directly calls propaganda against abortion and for traditional family values ​​“barbaric.”

Comments

[Gardamir]

But there is such an ideology as socialist Christianity. And now it’s not just feudal kleptocracy, but also propaganda of everything anti-human.

[pudelartemon]

Mikhalkov is right, even though I don’t like him

[olegff68]

What is he saying “correctly”? It doesn’t take much intelligence or courage to voice obvious things. Intelligence and courage are needed to voice effective methods for the phenomenon. The fact that the existing program to increase the birth rate works EXCLUSIVELY on parasitic sections of the population - gypsies, migrants, etc. for those who don't work. Courage is needed to voice the OBVIOUS - Russians need a separate, targeted program to increase the birth rate. But our government does not have this courage; it is easier to be polite.

[Roust]

Russians are young, the majority, and, unfortunately, do not want to have children, since their future children have nowhere to live.

[Soul of Russia87]

let them tell this to their ancestors who made 60 children in a hut of 10 square meters. The young people have gotten too drunk, you can’t dance in bars with children anymore! Lack of sleep, yelling, pissing diapers.

[Galleon]

How many children do you have? What is the family income?
Young people earn enough to support themselves; their income is not designed for a large family. The ancestors reasoned in exactly the same way: more children - there will be more income. But today’s life is different and the result is different - fewer children - there will be more income. There was no medicine, there was a terrible infant mortality rate.
Your statement is real obscurantism without an attempt at reflection and understanding.

[paul3390]

Alas for you - the ancestors did not do this out of love for children. It’s just that working hands are always needed in a peasant farm. In addition, the infant mortality rate was simply horrific; a lot had to be cut down in order for at least a couple to be guaranteed to survive. Well, before the type of reforms of the father of the Russian revolution, Stolypin, the land in the community was divided according to the eaters. More children - more land. Direct economic interest. But as soon as communal land ownership was destroyed, the birth rate in the villages immediately fell. Because one plot of land cannot feed many mouths...

So it's all about economics. Just like the bearded classics... And in our blessed time, three children is a direct path to poverty for the vast majority of the population. And unlike migrants, who don’t give a damn how their children will grow up, our people are somehow not ready to put up with this.

[Kote Pan Kokhanka]

It’s just that working hands are always needed in a peasant farm. In addition, the infant mortality rate was simply horrific; a lot had to be cut down in order for at least a couple to be guaranteed to survive.

I will support Pavel and add a little of my own. For example, Peter I was the 14th child in the family. In total, Alexei Mikhailovich had 16 children from two marriages. And this is the royal family!!!

[Galleon]

What is this to me, alas? I said the same thing.
Still, it’s good that our travelers didn’t have contraceptives...

[UserGun]

They will also tell you that they gave birth and raised these children as helpers in the household, and most importantly it was their PENSION for old age. Because the old people were fed by their children. There was simply no other way out to live longer.

[Cartographer]

Quote: Soul of Russia87

let them tell this to their ancestors who made 60 children in a hut of 10 square meters. The young people have gotten too drunk, you can’t dance in bars with children anymore! Lack of sleep, yelling, pissing diapers.

Well, you can live in a hut if you want. You can also remember the living standards of peasants and mortality rates. I understand that Mikhalkov needs soldiers to protect his noble mansion.

[P]

Being an asshole is not a crime. Nikolashka could have told his kids that, yeah

[Vasilenko Vladimir]

Quote: Roust

since their future children have nowhere to live.

there is a problem with housing, but that is not the basis, the main thing is the ideology of the “belly”, everything for oneself, children, family, this is an act of something personal, but over the past 30 years it has been drilled into the head that the main thing is “I”

[alexoff]

Not really. They just tell you from everywhere exactly what needs to be provided for the child, so that he has a mobile phone and wears new sneakers, sends him to tutors, etc. and you can’t give him a belt for his exorbitant requests. And at school they will harass him that he is a beggar with a push-button mobile phone and does not have an electric scooter.

[paul3390]

Well - let's look at everything from the other side? Our fathers and grandfathers left us a huge, rich country, one of the two superpowers, capable of doing unique things that others cannot do.

Why should we, their descendants, be equal to the standard of living of blacks in Africa?? Giving birth to a mass of children who are not able to provide with what is generally commonplace in decent countries? And only because the characters who stole our heritage suddenly realized that they don’t have enough workers, you see, in order to continue to exploit them for nothing?

I don’t argue - our ideology is truly the worst. In all aspects. But is that the only problem?

[alexoff]

First of all, this is due to the fact that capitalism involves sucking all the juice out of a person. And the rent for a one-room apartment in a house built in Moscow under Brezhnev is 45 thousand. I think it's similar in other cities. And will a man be able to feed his wife with an infant and a preschooler? Or will he slide down to the standard of living of a poor student? What if they fire you? Our birth rate is approximately the same as in the West, a similar system is that in the city you with two children begin to balance on the brink of poverty, and with three - here you have to pay at least 60 thousand just for food and housing and communal services for five. When they grow up, where will they live? It’s with these thoughts that parents fall asleep and decide not to multiply too much.
As I understand it, it has always been so that in cities people reproduced poorly even without the invention of contraception.

[paul3390]

In the West everything is exactly the same. Avon America - look at their old TV series and films, everywhere a man works, and at his main job, his wife sits at home with the children, running the household. What now? Both work like they were bitten in the butt at two jobs, and there is always not enough money, in debt like silk.. I'm talking about the general population, of course.. Ordinary hard workers. And all my friends who have been or live there confirm this. Capitalism, sir...

[alexoff]

Quote: paul3390

Capitalism, sir...

Yes, this is not even capitalism, but some kind of law of nature. It’s like money is money and goes from the weak to the strong. Just like in space, anything that falls into a black hole is lost. Some external influence can only break the vicious circle. Like the October Revolution, which scared Western capitalists and they raised wages. Or when the plague swept across Europe, the feudal lords began to reckon with the peasants and give them more rights, since there were a couple of times fewer peasants and the feudal lords did not have enough money for baronial squads.
Housing is a socially significant product, the prices of which are not regulated in any way; the state stupidly gives taxpayers’ money to citizens of Cyprus in the form of discounts on mortgages and maternal capital. And in Cyprus there lives a crowd of those who collected money from shareholders and did not build anything. In the event of a world war, they would slap a Sarmatian there...

[Gardamir]

And now what?

Democracy, emancipation, feminism. Abstract words, but for some they are more important than a full stomach and a roof over their head.

[Sergej1972]

In France, in the second half of the 19th and early 20th centuries, the birth rate in cities was higher than in rural areas.

[alexoff]

I suspect this is due to the fact that young virgins flocked en masse to the cities, where they ensured the birth rate. In the Leningrad region, the birth rate is also lower than in St. Petersburg. There is simply no one to give birth to. We need to look at the cross-section of the population and fertility.

[Sergej1972]

No, this was due to the predominance of small land plots among French peasants. When there is one heir, all the land goes to him. When there are several of them, you will have to divide the already small plot of land. Perhaps what you wrote about also played a certain role.

[alexoff]

I read on the Internet about the French, yes, in the 19th century they succeeded in reducing the birth rate with their laws. While in other countries the population has grown exponentially since the beginning of the 19th century, they adopted such laws that by the First World War they began to ring bells that there would soon be no one to fight. Perhaps there is some kind of conspiracy theory here, maybe the British imposed such a law following the results of the Napoleonic wars. In the Middle Ages, every fourth person in Europe was French

[Sergej1972]

Minuser, are you challenging a fact generally known among historians and demographers?

[Evgeny_Sviridenko]

Ideology is too strong a word for this obscenity. There is precisely regression and a slide into neo-feudalism. And ideology is, first of all, frameworks and restrictions, and for everyone without exception, it shapes the vector of development of society. In the USSR, party leaders, for example, also wanted to live in palaces and have private planes. But they made do with dachas and the Volga. For it was primarily ideology that kept him in check. And it was with the destruction of ideology that the collapse of the USSR began. Therefore, the current government avoids any ideology like fire, so as not to become its hostage. And also, for example, words such as war, martial law, etc. Otherwise, how can you do business with partners?

[P]

belt-belt, but nobody wants to raise an illiterate, sick, homeless monkey. 10 monkeys will never provide you with old age, even if they try very hard

[alexoff]

In Russia, there is a weak correlation between salary and level of education. Someone will go to work at a tire shop at 18 and will immediately receive an adequate salary and provide for themselves, someone will go to university, will study there for a long time and will end up receiving less, and they will start receiving it 5-6 years later. Similarly, intelligence and health are weakly dependent on the number of children.

[South Ukrainian]

. but that is not the basis, the main thing is the ideology of the “belly”,

I agree with you. We borrowed the ideology of consumerism from the West. Young people are chasing crazy things, if they have a few extra pennies, they need to buy an iPhone. No one washes their cars themselves anymore, they are too lazy to clean the apartment, so they call the cleaners. We can give many such examples, but the point is that this modern shortage of money cannot be solved by high salaries. They will earn more, they will buy more and more expensive things, it’s such a vicious circle. Nowadays there is a popular opinion that one should live here and now, i.e. today, that’s where they live.

[alexoff]

Quote: South Ukrainian

Nowadays there is a popular opinion that one should live here and now, i.e. today, that’s where they live.

because no one believes in the future. You ask people under 30 what kind of pension they will receive and from what age. Most will laugh and say that in their old age there will most likely be no pensions. Well, you still need to live to old age, which the current world situation does not guarantee

[Kronos]

And they do it right, there are no pockets in the coffin, why collect pennies?

[P]

the pursuit of things is fair, but if you don't chase, families often have nowhere to get 13-15 million in 21 prices. This is an unaffordable amount of money for the birth, upbringing and education of a minimally suitable child

[guest]

Quote: Vasilenko Vladimir

the main thing is the ideology of the "belly"

Well, when there is no state ideology, which is prohibited by the constitution, such an ideology appears. A holy place is never empty

[Andrey_5]

they don’t want to have children for a completely different reason, and the only way to change the situation is to radically change a person’s worldview, for example, completely remove pensions, turn off this device and legally oblige children to support non-working parents. No children or one child, well, bread and water will help.

[P]

A great way to completely and forever discourage the desire to have children. If previously the apartment was a reason for conflict, now your own children will wish death on their parents and many will kill their parents so as not to carry a stone around their necks

[Altmann]

The problem of fertility is not only a problem in Russia, it concerns the whole of Europe. This is the extinction or extermination of the white race. The fact that housing is not just a cover for a problem is something we also had a hard time with when we were young. If we cannot unite in the name of God and Christianity, we have no other ideology. In the Czech Republic, this problem is being addressed purposefully. Social policy is anti-youth and anti-birth rate. I would say the problem is deeper here.

[Soul of Russia87]

The apologists say that no one here gives birth to many children because there is little money, there is no confidence in the future, and there are few social services. Here's a world fertility map for you to think about. Maybe we should stop pointing at the mirror if our face is crooked?

[cast iron]

To begin with, let us tell you how many children you yourself have given birth to? And then we will continue the conversation on the topic.

[Soul of Russia87]

daughter, but my wife is already over 40, we are afraid of the second for his wife’s health. I would like more

[cast iron]

I also have a daughter. But for medical reasons, I most likely won’t be able to. And I have doubts that I can provide a decent life for two or more children. You see, I am not a half-educated Tajik from an village for whom life in a hut in the mountains is normal. And accordingly, he scolds children not out of great intelligence and the desire to have them, but rather even from a lack of knowledge about contraception. There is no need to cite semi-educated and in fact feudal or tribal societies as an example of how to live. Humanity, society - it is developing. Somewhere faster, somewhere slower. It has already happened that in modern civilized societies there are weighty arguments that slow down the increase in population. And one of the main obstacles is the total inaccessibility of housing for young families. This is a reinforced concrete fact. The examples of South Korea and Japan are particularly illustrative.

[Kronos]

So what are you talking about ancestors and 10 children and reproaching people if you yourself have one child? As usual, a moralist is always a hypocrite.

[paul3390]

I have two sons and already two grandchildren. And I can clearly say that if it weren’t for my help, my youngest would have been able to manage two children with very great difficulty. Even though I bought the apartment for them. And he earns - not exactly a penny, he works two jobs... So...

[cast iron]

This is what we are talking about. That the population looks at such “prospects” and decides to give birth to a maximum of one child.

[P]

it's not about development, but about the cost of creating a full-fledged person by the standards of society. In green countries the percentage of higher education is higher, in burgundy countries it is lower. No education - no expenses on it -> cheaper to make people -> more people. Another conversation is that in more educated countries they are not quite people

[cast iron]

Well thank God! The court master explained why Russians are dying out! We just need to change people's attitudes towards abortion! That's all! And let prices for housing, education, healthy food and consumer goods continue to fly into the sky. The master is not interested in prices. He has a family castle on Rublyovka and a bunch of apartments in Moscow - multiply at least every year.

[EvilCommunist]

And sociological science also says that the population grows when the economic situation in the country is favorable, in other words, the criterion for the successful management of a state is the growth of its population, for example, under Nicholas 2, whom the communists dubbed the bloody, the population growth amounted to +50 million people, and Russians people, rather than imported foreign specialists and the increase from reunification with the original Russian territories.
What about today? A population strangled by loans and thieves in power who don’t think about the people, but how to steal more and so that they don’t steal what has already been stolen, ugh
If anything, I am against abortion and have never been involved in it

[EvilCommunist]

In other words,..
a government with a negative demographic indicator must admit its professional incompetence...
It wasn’t me who said it, it’s sociological science that says...
From such demographics, let’s see (c)

[tatra]

Well, come on, praising Nicholas II, give the people the same wonderful life as under him. Introduce criminal penalties for abortions for women and doctors who performed abortions, remove all contraceptives, relocate 85% of the people to villages, and give land to peasants according to the number of eaters - the more children, the more land.
Like ?
And it is not known how much the population increased under Nicholas II - the statistics were kept ugly - according to various statistical data for 1914, the population of the Republic of Ingushetia was 166, and 173, and 179, and 184 million people. But the enemies of the USSR, naturally, choose only the largest number.

[EvilCommunist]

Yeah ...
Why do you live poorly under the Emperor? It’s better to live poorly under me (c) V.I. Lenin
I don’t believe in more than one communist fairy tale about the sovereign, invented by the communists by the chikists and veriukhai, and those who did not believe then rotted in the camps in the millions, that’s the achievement of your communists
Hostility towards communists is not hostility towards the USSR as a fatherland. Different things.
At 80, many were not communists and did not regret it

[tatra]

Some kind of nightmare. How many inadequate people did Gorbachev give freedom to?

[EvilCommunist]

Gorbachev, your first, sold his homeland to the Americans in order to hang out beautifully,
You had the courage to shoot an innocent family in the Ipatiev house, but you forgot to shoot a dozen real traitors to the fatherland, or rather, the security officers could no longer and were tired of hiding from the open robbery of the state, they were tired of being encrypted, which is what they actually did in the first place 20 years after the collapse of the USSR and essentially continues now

[Dart2027]

Quote: tatra

Introduce criminal penalties for abortions for women and doctors who perform abortions

Like under Stalin?

[ANB]

. let's go by the number of eaters - the more children, the more land

But it's the right idea. They gave me 3 acres for 10. But there is already a 4th one, but the plot is not being enlarged :(

[guest]

Mikhalkov raised the important issue of preserving the indigenous population of Russia

The question is correct, but there must be a Russia in which these people will live.

[tatra]

All this is verbiage. The enemies of the USSR created a System in which mortality increased by 20-40% and the birth rate decreased already in the 90s. Here is the news today that natural decline over these six months increased by 18% compared to the first half of 2023.
And none of them wants to change this System.

[paul3390]

And none of them wants to change this System.

Well, why - many people want it. Very many. It’s just not very clear yet how. Especially against the backdrop of the betrayal of the interests of the people by Gavriks like the Communist Party of the Russian Federation. There is no guiding force, and no leaders. And the revolutionary situation according to Lenin, alas, has not yet matured.

[tatra]

The Communist Party of the Russian Federation is exactly what our Irreplaceable allowed. And the enemies of the USSR, who portray the opposition, like all enemies of the USSR in general, have only AGAINST for their country and people, but there is nothing and no one useful FOR.

[UserGun]

Well, why not change it! Smart! Let's ban passports for the villagers, like under a mustachioed benefactor, we'll work for sticks without a pension, listen to Radio Radonezh and we'll be fruitful! )))

[paul3390]

Enough with the liberal crap! Aren't you tired? Is it difficult to read the primary sources first?

Passports - The Soviet government abolished EVERYONE. As soon as it was formed. Considering that a Soviet person does not need an identity document at all. And only then, at the end of the 20s, when it was necessary to introduce cards in cities, I went back to introducing passports, just to streamline the distribution of food. Precisely for this purpose, and not at all for the type of enslavement of peasants.

Did you yourself live under the USSR? Definitely not - otherwise they would know that in everyday life a passport was needed in two cases - when checking into a hotel and buying a plane ticket. ALL. When I was 20 years old, I put my passport somewhere at home - and discovered that I didn’t know where it was until I was 25, when it was time to change the photo. Before that, I didn’t even remember that I had it. For what? Those totalitarian terrible times are not like today’s free times, in which you can’t even go out to buy bread without a document...

Sticks are even worse crap. Workdays are just a tool for the further division of the collective farm’s PROFIT after the sale of the harvest. Your share. So it made complete sense to work for them...

Pension is the next crap. Collective farmers did not have a STATE pension!! Why - if they didn’t work for him, the collective farm is a private cooperative shop. And so he was obliged to take care of his shareholders in old age. What's not fair here?

[UserGun]

Listen, dear. Before you talk nonsense, think a little bit. And yes, I lived enough under happy Sicialism; I remember well how my grandmother rejoiced when she received a passport in the late 60s, and then lived on a pension of as much as 29 rubles, working on a collective farm all her life. It’s you who are so lucky for us, your comrades are now pushing for EVERYONE to live like this?! In SS 2.0))) You are deeply mistaken that you will find such fools at the present time, together with Mikhalkov. Your time is gone forever.

[paul3390]

Understood. Another young liberal telling us who lived then how terrible our life was in the USSR. You are definitely on the wrong site - your nonsense will not be appreciated here.

[UserGun]

It always amuses me how idiots like you blame some liberals for all the troubles, but they themselves don’t remember that, for example, 2 times two equals four) For some reason they get either 3 or 5))))

[paul3390]

Okay - once again, for the especially gifted. Something prompted me to give to charity in the morning, although I understand that it is useless.

1. WHAT could your type of grandmother do with a passport in the USSR in the 60s that she categorically could not do without a passport? The reasons for such wild joy? Examples in the studio.

2. The pension - as a shareholder of an agricultural cooperative, that is, a collective farm, was paid to her by this very cooperative. And this is not a pension at all - but its share of profits. Grandma’s fellow villagers voted for this at a general meeting. So they decided that they would pay her 29 rubles. But for some reason you blame the Soviet state for this, which has nothing to do with this. Because your grandmother did not work for him and did not pay him pension contributions.

Finally, turn on your brains a little - you live under capitalism!! It should be clear how shared ownership works!!!

[UserGun]

A passport was needed for many actions, you are ours without a passport) Even with developed
m sisialism and not very much))) As I understand it, you didn’t live at that time, so there’s nothing to talk to you about. And the most important action of the passport was registration, which you were without in the eyes of the state. You were tied to your village, kishlak, aul forever! Like the same slave.
But most of all, it’s funny to me when, without hesitation, you compared a collective farm with a cooperative))) Ayy little kids!!! Do you even know that you HAD to hand over ALL products to THE STATE?! At the price that the state rat with a party card will set. What kind of cooperative is this, you are a sick person of ours) And finally.... It was the State that paid my grandmother’s pension. At least read about this. The same by-laws. Goodbye, loser.

[IS-80_RVGK2]

Quote: UserGun

A passport was needed for many activities

Have you even read what it was like with passports in the USSR? What do you even know about the history of passports?

Quote: UserGun

But most of all I find it funny when you, without hesitation, compared a collective farm with a cooperative

Do you know how collective farm stands for? As for pensions, peasants in the Republic of Ingushetia were not paid at all. Again, you know nothing about the issue, but at the same time you are being clever.

[vsart]

Even judging by the number of minuses that you were given by the "fools" who lived in the USSR and honestly built socialism as the most just social system, which was always recognized even by many foreign enemies, like Kissinger, Thatcher, etc., you, based on your indiscriminate malice, are one of those who destroyed and/or undermined the foundations of socialism and now rejoice in wild capitalism, when less than 1% of the population parasitizes in luxury, about 5-10% is a conditional middle class, and the rest are forced to survive in hopeless poverty and in credit slavery, when a person does not even have the opportunity to buy normal food, medicine and pay for housing and communal services. According to official statistics alone, there are more than 40 million debtors with trillions in debt, which the bourgeois government is even afraid to voice. And no confidence in the future. Plus a man-made war, which could have been prevented if your beloved, insatiable government had not screwed up Ukraine. And you should have studied the history of your homeland better. And know that it was the Bolsheviks you hate who introduced pensions for everyone in Russia. And they were really small. Later on collective farms - 8 rubles without work experience, first 12 with work experience, and then they grew, and my mother, who raised 5 sons, received 40 rubles, and then 70...

I am 72 years old and my grandmother is the same age as the 12th century, raised 2 children, three of whom fought in the war, and was very happy with this pension. We must remember and understand what kind of times those were, that the USSR in its short history survived 1991 (two) terrible wars and nevertheless managed to create/build the second economy and defense in the world, which your like-minded people are still destroying. The peoples of the USSR won the war against fascism not because they fought for some dogmas, they fought first of all for the Soviet (people's) power, which gave them everything, starting with genuine equality, real social justice, free education and medicine, confidence in the future and the opportunity to work in their chosen specialty at their place of residence. Therefore, statements like "your time is up", to put it mildly, are incorrect, naive and irresponsible. You should know and remember that in the referendum in March 90, almost XNUMX% of the "oppressed" people consciously voted for the preservation of the USSR. And the thirst for justice - this is the main national feature according to school Dostoevsky, for which he was so hated by one of the main enemies of people's socialism, the swindler and foreign agent-traitor A. Chubais.

"The famous politician Henry Kissinger said that he was disappointed in the ideas of capitalism and considers the greatest sin of the United States to be the "systematic destruction of the only just world state - the Soviet Union"
“The highest and most characteristic feature of our people is a sense of justice and a thirst for it.” (F. M. Dostoevsky)

We know that the Great October, in the last century,
He awakened freedom of conscience and spirit in man.
And the essence of the Biblical commandments and instructions of God,
He embodied the bright deeds of accomplishment in the USSR!

In them the spirit of unity, faith and love triumphed,
Towards freedom with equality, to the soul of the native land...
And we really didn’t know of any other country like this,
Where people would live with songs, respecting each other!

Where honor and conscience are raised to a pedestal,
And equality has become a desired norm of life,
Where the man of labor rose above greed,
And people believed that they would live "under communism."

We all come from the unforgettable USSR,
Having nurtured the glory and greatness of the people,
Having shown the world an example of justice,
Where the conscience of being breathed into nature.

The ideas of justice are bright and noble,
Like the sun above the planet, they are full of warmth.
For the purposes of equality, others are unsuitable,
Only the wisdom of compassion is sanctified by goodness.

The USSR is a ray of light in the dark kingdom of the yoke of capital,
The soul's earthly flight to heaven from hopeless poverty.
And only after losing spiritual wealth did people realize
How hard and wretched is life without the light of a righteous dream.

https://stihi.ru/2017/10/27/3378

P.S. Capitalism in Russia is a vile step backwards:
You cannot serve God and Mammon at the same time.
The spirit of justice requires neither gold nor rewards,
He longs to rise again with equal rights on the throne.

[UserGun]

You cannot serve God and Mammon at the same time.

Yeah) And communism and God can exist at the same time! ))) However, history shows that this is nonsense.
You are wrong to reproach me for loving the current regime) Oh, you are wrong...)

[P]

Listen, dear sir, how did your grandmother even receive a state pension? A collective farm is a private office working for the profit of its shareholders, which, in fact, did not make any special pension contributions except for taxes. Any collective farmer could get a passport by simply moving to the city, which is what millions of them did. In the village, a passport was not needed at all. If we are talking about a collective farm pension, this is again a question of relations between the shareholder and the private office.

[Cartographer]

Quote: paul3390

that in everyday life a passport was needed in two cases - when checking into a hotel and buying a plane ticket. ALL

No need to fool around. When entering college, when changing your place of residence, when getting a job.

[paul3390]

Am I writing in Swahili? It’s strange - I didn’t notice myself... It seems that I wrote it clearly - in everyday life?

Aaaaah, I got it! During the Soviet Union, all you did was change jobs and housing once a month and regularly go to college? Am I right?

[Cartographer]

Quote: paul3390

Am I writing in Swahili? It’s strange - I didn’t notice myself... It seems that I wrote it clearly - in everyday life?

Aaaaah, I got it! During the Soviet Union, all you did was change jobs and housing once a month and regularly go to college? Am I right?

Do you seriously consider applying for a job to be an extraordinary case? I’m not talking about the fact that for any offense you needed a passport. Vershteen? By the way, cigarettes and alcohol were not sold to minors.

[UserGun]

That is, a passport was not needed, at all?! Oh, well done, Kamunyak! ))) And why then was mandatory passportization needed in the cities?! After all, it turns out that those same poor collective farmers were in the position of some kind of declassed elements, yeah ) Almost half of the population of the USSR. For as long as half a century ))) What were you jabbering about "equality and brotherhood"?!

[paul3390]

Read - trained? Passports in cities were introduced in the late 20s to streamline the distribution of food products using cards. Did I write it clearly?

[UserGun]

So collective farmers don't need passports?! ))) What does it have to do with cards in this matter?! ))) By the way, was it possible to at least enroll in a university?! And how can you get a free apartment))) without a passport?

You write down there, write down...))))

[Vladlous]

Yes, enough about the connection between fertility and income. Look, Europe was so far living an order of magnitude better than it is now, that the indigenous population was multiplying rapidly? Nothing like that! It's not about the money, it's about the brains. Liberalism is not about humanity and development, but about consumption and betrayal. And, by the way, about irresponsibility. This whole story with fatherlessness, widespread prostitution, lack of ideology - these are all signs of systemic failures. The solution to the problem is only forced.

If you want to have civil rights, give birth before the age of 25. If you don’t give birth freely, there is a way out, by the way, without a passport. As for boys who have not yet become men, but are already shaking their households left and right, civil rights (such as the right to higher education, the right to obtain a driver’s license, the right to vote and be elected, and the like) should begin only after passing military service, the duration of which must be at least 2 years, otherwise he also went away without a passport. In other words, the more you give to society and the country, the more rights and opportunities you have. This is how it should be, this applies to both men and women. Otherwise it’s a complete collapse.

Boys are required to go to school for martial arts as part of their physical education. A boy should know how to fight. It doesn’t matter whether he wants or doesn’t want, it’s supposed to be and that’s it. Girls at will, not their parents, but themselves. Down with this music and other drawings until the ninth grade. Stop producing impotents and nonentities.

Well, and of course patriotic education. Studying one's history, pride in the country, and this is possible after massacres among the elite, many of whose representatives, unfortunately, are examples of a tribe of thieves.

Glory to Russia!

[Dilettante grandfather]

If you want to have civil rights, give birth before the age of 25. If you don’t give birth freely, there is a way out, by the way, without a passport. As for boys who have not yet become men, but are already shaking their households left and right, civil rights (such as the right to higher education, the right to obtain a driver’s license, the right to vote and be elected, and the like) should begin only after passing military service, the duration of which must be at least 2 years, otherwise he also went away without a passport. In other words, the more you give to society and the country, the more rights and opportunities you have. This is how it should be, this applies to both men and women.

I agree with some things. Some don't. I didn’t give birth until I was 25 - what if I’m not able to? The female system is very unpredictable, you know... Again, in order to give birth, a woman must get married. Of course, someone can do this, but mostly girls need a man for this. What if it doesn’t work out? Go hand in hand, the main thing is to give birth?..
There's a lot you haven't thought through here.

[paul3390]

what if you can’t?

Then - pay for children for those who are able. If, of course, you are at all interested in the future of your country and people...

[Dilettante grandfather]

In Soviet times there was a tax on childlessness. Here you can return it. And depriving people of citizenship who are physically unable to have children is overkill.

[Fast_mutant]

Quote: Grandfather is an amateur

In Soviet times there was a tax on childlessness.

In common parlance it was called the “egg tax”! ))) I remember.

[Vasya_T.]

To give birth, a woman must get married

- Well, this is the date. I've never heard more nonsense in my life. How did Australo and other Pithecus survive without a registry office?

[cast iron]

Look, Europe was so far living an order of magnitude better than it is now, that the indigenous population was multiplying rapidly?

Which place is better? In many European countries, housing is basically unaffordable. Just like there is no maternity leave for women and kindergartens. It was and is full of its own economic problems, which, with the growing education and self-awareness of the population, provide some food for thought and action.

must begin only after completing military service, the duration of which must be at least 2 years,

This is too short a period. I would like your children and grandchildren to serve 15 years in a closed barracks. This is the only way they will become “real men”

In other words, the more you give to society and the country, the more rights and opportunities you have,

Just to begin with, we will all determine what reformers like you gave to society and the country. It will be very interesting to listen.

Down with this music and other drawings until the ninth grade.

Yeah. You haven’t heard about the harmonious development of personality. Give you a fight and a drill step from kindergarten. By the way, there have already been such examples in history. They didn't end well.

Glory to Russia!

Do you need to respond to your cry with “glory to the heroes”?

[Vladlous]

And then there is nothing to be surprised by the hordes of liberal degenerate nonentities.

[cast iron]

Thanks also to the “liberal nonentities”, we communicate openly on social networks. Still, freedom of thought and action moves society forward. Ossified, conservative societies do not develop. Historical fact.

[Vladlous]

"From the top, all roads lead down." This is my answer from the works of liberal Mikhail Weller.

[UserGun]

"In many European countries, housing is basically unaffordable"

In dugouts and huts live... Ehhh... poor things...

)))))))))))))))

[P]

In Greece or Spain, move a little away from the center. Concrete floors are the norm. A road literally through the wall is a common thing, as are windows with a view of the neighbors' windows at arm's length. And such a nice phenomenon as squatting is a song in general. It comes from a wonderful life and complete prosperity, right?

[cytadell]

We need to be stricter with young people, then it will make sense. In the meantime, we’ll be lisping as if we’re ruining the country. There are also questions for the government - about housing, and clinics with queues, sanatoriums for mothers and children (and simply for the health of children), about the family education program and the institution of family from school. A woman who dares to give birth to three children must take care of the children without having a headache about how to dress and put on their shoes. Is the father capable of working hard and being responsible for his family!? The role of the state in preserving the family, guaranteeing stability.
There are many questions - are there any answers to them?

[Kronos]

Absolute and stupid nonsense and forcing a birth will not work.

[P]

One question: how will you impose these wonderful rules on the whole of society if the apparatus of violence belongs to the raw materials export super-monopolies, which are obviously satisfied with the state of affairs with civil rights?

[Dutchman Michel]

openly mocked Christianity and promoted various deviations, including the so-called “values” of LGBT*

Macron, he openly kissed his minister

[Dilettante grandfather]

Well... Don't be so harsh on the French... Remember Leonid Ilyich! Wherever he flew to visit, all three times, from the heart... Indira Gandhi, they say, was pleased. The rest are not very...

[Andrey the Magnificent]

I'll throw in my 5 cents.
Most of the new buildings are one-room apartments or studios, maximum 2 rooms - this is already for the wealthy, because the prices are steep and that’s an understatement.
So, in the end, we must admit that the state program for maternal capital and other subsidies does not justify itself.
We need a government program to build affordable housing.
There must be a minimum of 4 bedrooms.
We need to build houses like in America, multi-room ones, like townhouses.
Then they will give birth.
And you can’t make so many children in a one-room or two-room apartment.
We need to develop 10 - 20 options for houses and build them, not yachts for 500 million dollars.
But then we will have to admit that for too many years they were engaged in continuous prophonation, only imitating vigorous activity, and when they realized that people did not want to give birth and live with four of them, not to mention five of them in a two-room apartment, maximum in three-room apartment, they decided to express the situation by importing here wild hordes who, in comparison with their life in the villages, found themselves in the promised paradise and agree to live with six of them in one room, because in their homeland they could not even dream of such a thing.
But Mikhailov, as always, technically avoids answering the question: WHO IS TO GUILTY?
Although everyone understands perfectly well who is responsible for everything...

[Fast_mutant]

Quote: Andrey the Magnificent

Minimum must be 4 bedrooms

I totally agree.
And we also have a ton of forests and territories in our country! We need to build PERSONAL WOODEN houses, not human houses. At the same time, road construction will also increase.
For example, I wouldn’t sell my dacha for a house like this. Although, to be honest, I don’t have enough strength to maintain both a dacha and an apartment.
And also develop production not only in St. Petersburg/Moscow. What’s stopping you from building factories that are not “millionaires”, but at least “hundreds”? and evenly across Russia? I'm not talking about the "large heavyweights", but most of the businesses fit well into the "hundreds" (in terms of the number of employees). Then, by the way, defense capability will increase. Try to knock out all this little stuff at once, 10-100 workers at a time!
By expanding the “horizontal” development of the country, both large and small businesses will benefit!
All is well!

[P]

need-need-need. Who needs it? Decisions are made in the interests of raw materials export monopolies by their executive authorities on the basis of laws adopted for them. They DON'T NEED IT.

[Rvlad]

When I was young, the question did not arise for me: to have or not to have children. Have. At that time I was confident in the state and knew: I would work and everything would work out. Which is exactly what happened. And now my sons in the state, and I myself, are not only unsure, but consider it hostile to us. We are nobody in the country and there is no way to call us. We have grandchildren, but we don’t see any future prospects. Mikhalkov can fantasize and come up with some values. He never served the country, but earned money...

[cast iron]

Mikhalkov is a thieves celestial who has been riding like cheese in butter since he was a baby back in the USSR. Already in his teens, he is on friendly terms with great directors... He is basically unfamiliar with the problems of the population. To listen to him is to disrespect yourself. Under Yeltsin he said one thing, but now he said something else. Opportunist.

[ivan2022]

"A man passes like a master
Your vast homeland"
This was guaranteed by the laws of the Soviet government.
But there was no point.
In Russia, “laws don’t work” because for them to work they need a special Master who will make them work. They thought it was Stalin. But Stalin died, and the new Master changed Soviet laws to anti-Soviet ones... And why does a Russian person need laws at all if he still needs the Master?
As Alexander the 3rd said: “A peasant needs a Tsar and a whip”... For Russian people are not some kind of Jews or French.


And this is the result of the existence of a people who have never been the master of their land.

[tatra]

The enemies of the USSR are excellent at comparing what they had under the USSR and what they GOT thanks to the destruction of the USSR.
But they don’t know how to compare what is best for their country and people.
And this is an axiom that the USSR is the best State for the majority of the people, both in comparison with the Republic of Ingushetia and in comparison with the Russian Federation. And the enemies of the USSR themselves prove this by the fact that at every such comparison they rush to rage against the USSR, because they admit by this that they have nothing for the Republic of Ingushetia and the Russian Federation.

[EvilCommunist]

Listen, USSR, before the USSR there were 1000 years of monarchy which you destroyed and with grief you yourself lasted 90 years, you feel the difference between 1000 and 90, can I tell you what you got from the Republic of Ingushetia?
History has taken you to the landfill for 90 years... sit, you belong there

[cast iron]

before the USSR there were 1000 years of monarchy which you destroyed and with grief you yourself lasted 90 years, you can feel the difference

And even before the USSR, there was capitalism in Russia, under the control of the Monarch. This capitalism lasted 50 years. Those. even less. Can you hear the difference? :)

And we also have the example of a communist country. China, in case you don't understand. Let's look at what China has done over the past 34 years, and what democratic capitalist Russia has done? Can you hear the difference?

[P]

Tell us about the war on all borders that we inherited, about the total mess that we inherited from the Russian Empire on literally every piece of territory of the former Russian Empire. Tell us about the lack of medicine and epidemics from the Russian Empire, about the zero mechanization of agriculture, about the zero melioration from the Russian Empire, about the miserable transport that simply did not exist, about the missing energy sector, about the illiterate population that had to be taught to read. Tell us about the flogged people, yeah.

[Fakapych]

Watch the movie "Idiocracy" at the beginning everything is described correctly

[fa2998]

Women have abortions so as not to create poverty. People should not live like beasts, stretching their money until they get paid. No amount of “maternity capital” will change the situation. These “fantastic” figures about the average salary of 72 thousand are literal. They do not take into account the colossal income gap between segments of the population.

[South Ukrainian]

. Women have abortions to avoid creating poverty.

This is not always the case. Raising and raising children is hard work.

[Fast_mutant]

Quote: fa2998

figures about the average salary of 72 thousand

In St. Petersburg they announced that the average is 72500... only the Median is only 50. I think this one is a little too high. Moreover, with the rapid growth of the average, the median practically does not grow. I believe in this. The authorities do not offend themselves by spitting on the “rabble”. How to give birth? Produce poverty?

[Comrade I]

Oh, the bakery has come out. With the found reason for the decline in the population of the Russian Federation. And this, of course, is the damned, decaying West. And... um... gays?

[Dart2027]

Quote: Comrade Y

Oh, the bakery has come out

Do you mean citizen of the USSR?

[the lord]

The midshipman's drunken sidekick, Krivoruchko, teaches the Russian woman how to live again. Vanka Gnilin attacks! Give us a new feudalism of Dugin and Gundyaev!

[Pashka Kolokolnikov]

The meat grinder of the war, which has not yet truly begun, will grind the male part of the titular nation, especially its reproductive part. But a holy place is never empty. Russian women will be trampled by newcomers. Everyone understands where they will come from. “Thank you” to our king for this war, for the future future of Russia

[P]

already grinding. Mostly obedient ones

[Viktor Grishchenko]

How can you worry about the citizens of the country by exporting fuel and energy resources abroad without particularly worrying about prices on the domestic market of the country. Prices are constantly rising, what demographics can you write about? Prices in the country depend on international speculator exchanges and not on internal cabinet prices. Many examples

[P]

The state apparatus is managed in the interests of the largest export monopolies. Which export and speculate and set domestic prices and give orders to explain the situation to their dolls, in whose anuses they keep their fists 24/7. Open your palm - the doll starts talking, close it - it shuts up

[Old Horseradish]

Some experts express the opinion that over the past decades, about 2 trillion dollars have been taken out of the country.
The bulk of the population is deprived of basic social guarantees. The minimum wage does not provide even simple physical survival. The ideological basis is the cult of the oligarchy and their minions. You can continue for a long time and tediously. Subcolonies always have approximately the same picture.

[Fast_mutant]

Quote: Old Fuck

The bulk of the population is deprived of basic social guarantees

But on the box - everything is fine.
Everyone cares about you.
The other day they called from the clinic: “Please undergo medical examination.” It became interesting, especially since it was a day off. I went. They gave me a 3-sheet questionnaire “...what illnesses did you and your relatives have” and did a cardiogram. All! HEALTHY! They didn’t even make a FLYUSHKA! I also emphasized, do it! They said, “You did it 11 months ago!” A year hasn't passed. And then, 11 months “according to the client”! So how to survive with such medicine? And you're talking about fertility here. Yes, if I die 2 sons, who will wait until retirement? This, by the way, is an old joke: “the bad parent is the one who didn’t bring his children to retirement”! ))) One son is 31, the second is 21. Both work, but they don’t receive 75 kes!

[Ross xnumx]

Mikhalkov raised the important issue of preserving the indigenous population of Russia

Most likely, he is not the only one concerned about the issue of preserving the indigenous population of Russia.
This question worries me because...
Nothing depends on me, I will not change my opinion on the problem of demography, but those who are competent to solve such problems will. chose to protect the interests of the property class.
The opinion of the people (judging by the referendums held, who knows when) no longer interests them. Moreover, they don’t even know any other way to live in the country other than the massive domination of the territory by migrants and maintaining a low standard of living for the Russian population.

[Ruslan Smorodin]

Mikhalkov was 30 years late with this question. It's too late to drink Borjomi

[Vasya_T.]

Now, in the eyes of the Russian leadership, a “traditional family” is a divorced family with three trailers from three different fathers, who pay alimony to the female (certainly not to the children). This is already traditional, it couldn’t be more traditional. "Maternity capital". 102% of divorces. Immediately after the divorce, the stepmother turns the children against the father, and in 70% of cases prevents the father from seeing the children. The entire family code is about squeezing out a man’s property and how “a man should.” Attention, question - why the hell (such a plant) does a man need such a complete “family”? Moral (ugly people) in power have been creating this situation for decades.

Eliminate alimony and the extraction of a man’s property during a divorce, and in the same year the percentage of divorces will drop 20 times. But the authorities have other goals.

[ivan2022]

There are a lot of divorces in Russia and those from which there is nothing to take.

There are no “good males” and “bad females”. Both are born and grow up in the same families. There are only traditions of society.

And “in the eyes of management” is simply their reflection. The leadership did not come to us from the moon, it comes from the same gate as the rest of the people.

[Cartographer]

Quote: Vasya_T.

Abolish alimony and the extraction of a man’s property during a divorce, and in the same year the percentage of divorces will fall 20 times

Debatable. People get divorced for various reasons. Or do you want to do it like under the Tsar Pea, when the first marriage was lifelong and the bride saw the groom on the wedding day? Or when 15 year old girls were married off to 40-50 year olds?

[Kronos]

Lies and nonsense about evil women and good men.

[Desperado]

Quote from Kartograph

Or when 15 year old girls were passed off as 40-50 year olds?

Well, judging by the laws being adopted and the trends towards a return to family values, everything is moving towards this. And let it be not 15-year-olds, but 18-year-olds who are accomplished men. I finished school, got married, and then it’s up to the man to decide. So to speak, a marriage of convenience is the strongest!!! =)

[ivan2022]

Everything is going in the opposite direction.

But if a rich Barinok like Nikita wants to promote himself, he holds the cards. Like, “The master was concerned that the servants would not die...”

[Sergeant_1989]

The answer is simple, people do not have enough funds for a decent existence, there is no faith in the future where their children will live with dignity and happiness. There is no money for education, medicine. Without this, only migrants give birth in dozens. They had a natural selection: the child survived - well, he didn’t survive, there are still 9 left. The degradation of the country over the past 30 years has been colossal.

[vvnab]

What did he “raise” there?
We have been dying out since 1990. And now only the lazy don’t talk about it!
Hipozhor!

[Evgeny Popov_3]

Many commentators write that the problem of the birth rate is a lack of housing - this is completely untrue. There are three of us parents, and only two of us each have a daughter, although some have one apartment, some have two. And we are not going to give birth again. Even if the state gives me even 20 million, we still won’t give birth anymore.

[ivan2022]

After all, this is your business, no one forces you to live in this world, and not just give birth......

The topic is different here : What is the reason for the decline in the birth rate of Russians specifically? Can you tell me anything about the topic? (Without telling stories about yourself, what you have and how much you have, and without throwing shit at others....)
And how much money and apartments you have here, no one really cares.

[barbos]

They begin to remember Ogarkov’s doctrine. If you look at it, Nikolai Vasilyevich was quite a creative person with very good experience and a wealth of knowledge. Some of his ideas were brought to life, but not with us.

[vsart]

A response to the lying and boorish comments of user UzerGun on one of the most pressing topics of life in bourgeois Russia.

Even judging by the number of minuses that you were given by the "fools" who lived in the USSR and honestly built socialism as the most just social system, which was always recognized even by many foreign enemies, like Kissinger, Thatcher, etc., you, based on your indiscriminate malice, are probably one of those who destroyed and/or undermined the foundations of socialism and now rejoice in wild capitalism, when less than 1% of the population parasitizes in luxury, about 5-10% is the conditional middle class, and the rest are forced to survive in hopeless poverty and in credit slavery, when a person does not even have the opportunity to buy normal food, medicine and pay for housing and communal services. According to official statistics alone, there are more than 40 million debtors with trillions in debt, which the bourgeois government is even afraid to voice. And no confidence in the future. Plus a man-made war, which could have been prevented if your beloved, insatiable government had not screwed up Ukraine. And you should have studied the history of your homeland better. And know that it was the Bolsheviks you hate who introduced pensions for everyone in Russia. And they were really small. Later on collective farms - 8 rubles without work experience, first 12 with work experience, and then they grew, and my mother, who raised 5 sons, received 40 rubles, and then 70...

I am 72 years old and my grandmother, a contemporary of the 12th century, who raised 2 children, three of whom fought in the war, was very happy with this pension. We must remember and understand what kind of times those were, that the USSR in its short history survived 3 (two) terrible wars and nevertheless was able to create/build the second economy and defense in the world, which your like-minded people are still destroying. The peoples of the USSR won the war against fascism not because they fought for some dogmas, they fought first of all for the Soviet (people's) power, which gave them everything, starting with genuine equality, real, social justice, free education and medicine, confidence in the future and the opportunity to work in their chosen specialty at their place of residence. It is not surprising that in post-war families, despite objective circumstances, as a rule, there were 5-1991 or even more children. Therefore, statements like "your time has passed" are, to put it mildly, incorrect, naive and irresponsible. You should know and remember that in the referendum in March 90, almost XNUMX% of the "oppressed" people consciously voted for the preservation of the USSR, respected throughout the world. And the thirst for justice - this is the main national characteristic, according to Dostoevsky in school, for which he was so hated by one of the main enemies of people's socialism, the swindler and foreign agent-traitor A. Chubais.

"The famous politician Henry Kissinger said that he was disappointed in the ideas of capitalism and considers the greatest sin of the United States to be the "systematic destruction of the only just world state - the Soviet Union"
“The highest and most characteristic feature of our people is a sense of justice and a thirst for it.” (F. M. Dostoevsky)

We know that the Great October, in the last century,
He awakened freedom of conscience and spirit in man.
And the essence of the Biblical commandments and instructions of God,
He embodied the bright deeds of accomplishment in the USSR!

In them the spirit of unity, faith and love triumphed,
Towards freedom with equality, to the soul of the native land...
And we really didn’t know of any other country like this,
Where people would live with songs, respecting each other!

Where honor and conscience are raised to a pedestal,
And equality has become a desired norm of life,
Where the man of labor rose above greed,
And people believed that they would live "under communism."

We all come from the unforgettable USSR,
Having nurtured the glory and greatness of the people,
Having shown the world an example of justice,
Where the conscience of being breathed into nature.

The ideas of justice are bright and noble,
Like the sun above the planet, they are full of warmth.
For the purposes of equality, others are unsuitable,
Only the wisdom of compassion is sanctified by goodness.

The USSR is a ray of light in the dark kingdom of the yoke of capital,
The soul's earthly flight to heaven from hopeless poverty.
And only after losing spiritual wealth did people realize
How hard and wretched is life without the light of a righteous dream.

https://stihi.ru/2017/10/27/3378

P.S. Capitalism in Russia is a vile step backwards:
You cannot serve God and Mammon at the same time.
The spirit of justice requires neither gold nor rewards,
He longs to rise again with equal rights on the throne.

[pavel.tipin]

There can't be a large family in the city, there are only exceptions. Children need a safe environment in the fresh air, ideally a village. To live in a village, there must be developed small business.

[V Rodichev]

The demographic vector has already changed. There is an accelerated replacement of the indigenous ethnic group by newcomers from Central Asia, who come with large families and continue to breed here like cockroaches, comfortably settling down on social security. So by 2100 there will not be 112 million, but significantly more, only Russians among them will be 10-15% maximum. The rest are Uzbek-Tajik "new Russians".

[AC130 Gunship]

In the early 90s, there were few births because people did not understand how they would raise and feed their children. In the early to mid-2000s, births began to increase. There was stability and an understanding of the future.
The situation today is reminiscent of the wild 90s

[AC130 Gunship]

We won't talk about small villages and towns. There are no Asians there. Today (according to various estimates, since there is no formal registration or immigration program in the Russian Federation in general) in Moscow approximately every 6th resident is Asian. In 5-10 years it will be every 5th. In the South-Eastern Administrative District, from 2/3 to 3/4 of the students in schools are not Slavs.
It all started not yesterday. In the late 90s - early 2000s, the first janitors began to appear, who were settled in the basements of houses. Now - the third generation of those who arrived, who absolutely do not assimilate, live by their own concepts, open their own businesses, somewhere there is legal polygamy, slaves, etc., etc.
And our state continues the open gate policy. And where did the young 20-30 year old guy go, who crossed the border at Domodedovo airport and does not speak Russian at all, no one cares. Well, maybe the cops will shake him down a bit at the metro...

[pavel.tipin]

It would never occur to anyone to declare private property in clean air or water, because they are vitally necessary for human life. In the same way, in our northern country, separate housing is vitally necessary for a young family. The only way out is that all housing should be state-owned, and the surplus housing should be taken away through exchange.