BRICS vs SWIFT – leave and not return

20
BRICS vs SWIFT – leave and not return


Tehran 2024


So, the BRICS countries unexpectedly quickly began to transfer mutual payments to national currencies. But the main thing is not even this, especially since there will be a lot of difficulties along this path; what is more important is that the BRICS seriously expect to do without using the SWIFT system.



There, as you know, it is not entirely formal, but almost every step is automatically converted into dollars. At the same time, one of the experts called this BRICS decision a reaction of community functionaries to recent decisions in the same financial sphere of another integration structure - the SCO.

As is known, the SCO even started talking about some kind of common currency not long ago, but the traditional confrontation between India and China has forced it to limit itself to plans to create a single bank. Everything is being done, again, by analogy with BRICS and the local system of mutual settlements. Now it's about integrating digitally.

Agree, otherwise in our time all this fuss with finances makes no sense. Integrating finance separately from the dollar digitally means not just using computer networks, but based on advanced blockchain technologies, where cryptocurrencies are involved.

It is significant that the initiator of the process of divorce from SWIFT was not Russia, which is still very closely integrated into the world economy, but Iran. The Islamic Republic, which has been balancing on the brink of a big crisis for almost a year now, did it for it. the war with Israel, during this time, in general, integration has become quite active.

A free trade zone with the unification of the EAEU has been created and is about to begin to really work; Iran, in just two years of membership, has become something of a locomotive in the SCO. Finally, the former global outcast joined BRICS, not to say the long-awaited one, and immediately together with Egypt, the UAE and Ethiopia, which is absolutely dubious in terms of integration.

Iran, in addition to, of course, Russia, had to endure a lot of difficulties in connection with Western sanctions, which resulted in a noticeable decline in the country’s economy and hyperinflation, which has not yet been suppressed. Tehran needs such a powerful single anchor as BRICS, and it would be nice to have a single currency that can save the Iranian rial from depreciation.


Nothing personal - just blockchain


The BRICS apparatus is not very active in commenting on the innovation, but they assure that companies and banks of the nine member countries of the association will have the opportunity to transfer money among themselves, similar to SWIFT. The timing is not specified, but the system will only work according to the principle of the movement of cryptocurrencies.

Now it is not so important on what operating basis it will be based - Chinese or Russian, but the path to the single BRICS currency most likely lies through it. New digital money is unlikely to replace rubles, yuan, rupees and the same Iranian rials, especially since there is no urgent need for this.

But the need to move away from SWIFT is clearly ripe today, as is the desire of many, even very many, to distance themselves as much as possible from the dollar. Experts differ in their assessments of what the real price for the widespread use of American currency is these days, because we may be talking about a tiny fraction of a percent, but that is by no means the main thing.

Do not forget that in the same SWIFT system, deductions in favor of the dollar are a priori included. Not the largest ones - even the well-known Russian character in almost the highest commanding position that is possible in Russia now took much more, for which he received the nickname “Two Percent”.

But the main thing is that mandatory fees for exchange rate differences, insurance and service fees are imposed on every single transaction in dollars. Regardless of participants and sizes.

It is characteristic that if the topic of a single BRICS currency surfaced quite a long time ago, as soon as a single BRICS bank was created at the instigation of South Africa, and someone even showed this promising money to the public, then it was mainly specialists who spoke about a single payment system. And all projects of this kind were considered promising, sometimes deliberately.

There are many disagreements in BRICS that can slow down the processes of financial integration. There are different dynamics of currencies, and absolutely different stability of the economies of the community countries. Iran still cannot overcome the black currency market, and this acts like a red rag on a bull for its BRICS or SCO partners.


Nevertheless, the deputy head of the Iranian Central Bank for international affairs, Mohsen Karimi (pictured), recently decided to unveil a far from indisputable initiative in Moscow. Understanding that Russia will be the first to support the idea itself. After all, it, too, like Iran, unlike other BRICS members, has already been excommunicated from the SWIFT system.

Is there life without SWIFT?


On the pages of VO there were many publications on this topic - one might even consider it a whole series Russia without SWIFT is not scary. However, the discussion there was mainly about how to cope without connecting to the system. But in BRICS, it seems, they immediately decided to go further, and not limit themselves to the creation of an independent blockchain system.


Experts are already ready to support it with an analogue of an international organization to combat money laundering and the financing of terrorism. Such a global service, as you know, is called FATF and generally shows enviable efficiency.

But again, we must remember - this is efficiency in favor of the dollar and dollar turnover. By all indications, the BRICS do not want to work for the dollar here either. In this regard, it would be very appropriate to quote the already mentioned Iranian banker M. Karimi, who especially notes that the BRICS member states as “Economically developing powers need their own settlement mechanism to create a unified financial system.”

An alternative to SWIFT - an international, but, excuse the repetition, practically monopolistic interbank system for transmitting information and making payments - is actually being sought by many, and has been for a long time. The head of the Bank of Russia, Elvira Nabiullina, also recalled this not long ago.


Risks when using SWIFT have now begun to grow rapidly due to the rather weak security of the system itself. It is no coincidence that a total of 159 foreign participants from 20 countries have already connected to the Russian Financial Message Transmission System.

Compared to SWIFT, which is not completely tied to the blockchain system, the Russian analogue, which is quite capable of becoming the basis for the BRICS system, operates in precisely this reality. And since there are no restrictions on cryptocurrency, it is simply beneficial for anyone who connects to the system. Moreover, there is no need even for conversion, sometimes multiple times.

Through the new system, it remains possible to buy dollars without restrictions. And this is just a pleasant bonus to the ability to transfer money between countries without restrictions, when various types of bank commissions and insurance, and even more so sanctions, do not become an obstacle.
20 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +1
    10 August 2024 06: 40
    BRICS vs SWIFT – leave and not return

    It's time. It's high time!
    There is already enough evidence of Anglo-Saxon meanness and hypocrisy.
  2. -1
    10 August 2024 08: 26
    I don’t understand why the author got hooked on SWIFT, although it’s just a transfer system (allowing the Yankees to control all transactions). It’s the easiest way to get around it, even if you go back to your grandfather’s methods). But building a settlement system divorced from the global one is a more difficult issue. And, for some reason, it seems to me that everything will return to the analogue of the transferable ruble.
    1. -5
      10 August 2024 08: 51
      All power to the Soviets!

      Quote: Arch
      why did the author get hooked on SWIFT, even though it’s just a translation system

      "A long road begins with the first step"

      Quote: Arch
      It seems to me that everything will return to the analogue of the transferable ruble.

      At the BRICS summit, a digital currency (instead of the dollar) based on the yuan, ruble and drachma will be adopted for mutual settlements (September is already close).
      1. +3
        10 August 2024 08: 58
        Well, let's wait for the results. In fact, when the system starts working, the three-letter ones will be forced to extract the information that is now flying straight into Pasyuk’s mouth, like Pasyuk’s dumplings. And among other things, as Leo Taxil wrote, the truth is for a different reason: the blow was delivered to the most vulnerable place - the wallet. .
    2. +1
      10 August 2024 10: 16
      Quote: Arch
      I don’t understand why the author got hooked on SWIFT

      The system is controlled by the US Federal Reserve and is used as an instrument of economic warfare. We don't need this kind of hockey!
      Quote: Arch
      And, for some reason, it seems to me that everything will return to the analogue of the transferable ruble.

      The BRICS countries need their own currency (for mutual settlements). The transferable ruble is a financial surrogate, served for settlements within the CMEA, did not have access to international markets, and served primarily the political interests of the bloc. hi
      1. 0
        10 August 2024 18: 03
        Multilateral clearing with an established limit of gold equivalent in the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank, New Development Bank or other financial institution through which settlements of the association's participants are carried out.
        This option will ensure financial independence from subversive activities and currency speculators, does not infringe on patriotic feelings and preserves the internal circulation of national banknotes, as is the case with the IMF’s special drawing rights, which can be transferred to hard currency or national funds, pay for government purchases and debts, or give loans to anyone with your own hands you can't touch it.
        Last year, V. Putin said that in October 24, the Russian Federation would offer for consideration its own version of mutual settlements, independent of external factors. Any proposal must go through the stage of discussion and approval, the question is how long it will take if approved
        1. 0
          10 August 2024 18: 49
          Quote: Jacques Sekavar
          Any proposal must go through the stage of discussion and approval, the question is how long it will take if approved

          If the proposal is reasonable and has competitive advantages over the US dollar, if approved, it will not take much time. In a year or two you can create COPY US Federal Reserve, Fort Knox, US dollar, both fiat and crypto, payment system for these financial instruments. Entrust this to the board of directors of the BRICS countries, and the executive director chosen by it. hi
      2. 0
        10 August 2024 22: 06
        Regarding SWIFT, I will repeat once again that a political decision is sufficient to bypass it. Yes, the speed of payments has decreased, but this is nothing compared to the Yankees losing control.
        The question that the author is really trying to consider is the currency of payments in the BRICS. Not on a global scale, but within the bloc. And here any options are possible. Let me also remind you about such a currency for internal payments in the block as ECU. Now degenerated into the euro.
        1. +1
          11 August 2024 05: 58
          Quote: Arch
          The question that the author is really trying to consider is the currency of payments in the BRICS. Not on a global scale, but within the bloc.

          Why limit yourself in trade and payments? You need to try to conduct business in such a way that the BRICS currency is attractive to other countries. To do this, you need a little - analyze the “jambs” of the dollar and eliminate them. And the first is the dollar's departure from the gold standard. Second, the dollar is the domestic currency of the United States, and this needs to be corrected. An international currency should not give an advantage to one of the countries. A return to the gold standard will not allow the uncontrolled issuance of money, be it digital or fiat (banknotes). Europe's refusal of the ECU and the transition to the Euro just means that the currency within the bloc is flawed. Smart people learn from other people's mistakes, not smart people repeat them.
          1. +1
            11 August 2024 09: 45
            Colleague, you, in principle, also approach what is needed: a) a supranational currency, b) providing this currency with real goods and materials. And this question is quite serious. Why did I mention the transferable ruble? Moreover, this is one of the attempts to use a supranational currency. For the rest. You will have to start small inside the block by failing the system and eliminating the jambs. But you are right that you are right to plan this matter on a grand scale.
    3. +2
      10 August 2024 17: 42
      1. The author does not understand why the minus is due. SWIFT is just a transfer system with a high degree of reliability and insurance. Convenient and, so to speak, a de facto standard in the banking industry.
      2. On earth, the world dollar system and SWIFT or other transmission system will not change this.
      3. Russia needs a sovereign emission center without being tied to organizations (institutions) of the Bretton Woods system (Bretton Woods agreement (English: Bretton Woods system) - an international system for organizing monetary relations and trade settlements, established as a result of the Bretton Woods conference, held with July 1 to July 22, 1944. Changed the financial system based on the “gold standard.” Named after the resort of Bretton Woods in New Hampshire, USA, the conference laid the foundation for such organizations as the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (IBRD) and the International Monetary Fund (IMF).
      4. BRICS will not be able to issue a new currency that will suit all its member states. Economies are too different.
      5. The transition to national currencies and settlement within the BRICS is possible and necessary. A clearing center is sufficient for this.
      6. Having your own financial messaging system within the BRICS is a good idea. The system of digital currencies, blockchain, etc. does not play a role at all. These are just tools for creating a system.
      7. “Integrating finance separately from the dollar digitally means not just using computer networks, but based on advanced blockchain technologies, where cryptocurrencies are involved.” - This phrase contains a basic misunderstanding of the authors: What to integrate digitally, what kind of finance, what kind of blockchain and why? Cryptocurrencies are still derivatives of the dollar. First, the formation of a monetary unit untied from the dollar and backed by at least something, exit from the Bretton Woods system, quotation of this currency relative to other currencies and the dollar, and then take it into account in anything. Either on paper or digitally. Is it really planned to mine the national currency uncontrollably? No, no one will give it.
      8. Blockchain is needed for absolute control over the movement of funds. I hope the authors understand this?
      9. The modern cryptocurrency system is a pyramid for creating fictitious assets to tie up available funds on the market in an attempt to reduce global inflation.
      1. -1
        10 August 2024 22: 09
        Colleague, I agree with you on almost all points.
      2. 0
        10 August 2024 23: 18
        World trade is based on equality of exports and imports. If this equality does not exist, then the difference should be repaid in a currency that is easily realizable, i.e. With this currency you can easily buy the desired product elsewhere. This is an axiom. Now this currency is mainly the dollar, less often the euro, yen and yuan. How to pay technically is another question, and Vladimir is absolutely right.
    4. 0
      12 August 2024 12: 10
      It's very simple. If you have dollars in your account and a correspondent account. US Bank, then, being connected to Swift, you can make instant transfers around the world. And if your bank is disconnected from Swift, then we immediately forget about instantaneity, and in general the problem of making a payment arises. It's easier than sanctions. In theory, sanctions are introduced with some formulation, for example, for the production of military equipment. But if you are a manufacturer of asthma drugs, it just won’t work out here. And here it’s simple - the bank was turned off and that’s it, a ton of clients in... (the moderators won’t let it through).
  3. +3
    10 August 2024 10: 14
    The viability of the system alternative to Swift depends on the volume of payments passing through it, and the calculations depend on integration ties within the SCO, BRICS, EAEU, and this is the whole problem - the economies of all participants in these associations, including such giants as China and India, are not oriented towards each other as in the EU, and to the west - to the USA and the EU, settlements with which are carried out not in national funds, but in hard currency, and the entire global financial and economic system is built and supports these banknotes. Therefore, the question is not about an alternative to Swift and the dollar, but about an alternative to the global financial system, which includes banks, exchanges, rating and insurance agencies, and many other things, including supranational structures.
    That is why the United States calls its main enemy not the Russian Federation, but the PRC, which is trying to undermine the existing global financial system based on the dollar and enter into a fight with the United States with its global initiatives to build a society of a common destiny - the same globalization, but under the ideological, political and other leadership of the PRC , which is unacceptable for the Western bourgeoisie and, in principle, for the Russian one too, but the break with the West forces the Russian Federation to continue to play on the side of the PRC and try to reach an agreement with the West.
    1. +1
      11 August 2024 07: 09
      Quote: Jacques Sekavar
      but the break with the West forces the Russian Federation to continue to play on the side of the PRC and try to reach an agreement with the West.

      I didn't guess right. Collect your belongings and say goodbye to your beloved west. Yes
      The West has proven that agreements with it are impossible. Russia will not be a colony of the West. fool
      1. 0
        11 August 2024 10: 44
        V.V. Putin, other big bosses and the media have repeatedly said that the war is for the survival of the Russian Federation - how can this be understood?
        If the Russian Federation wins, this is one thing, but what if the war ends with a separate deal?
        V.V. Putin has been talking about the Russian Federation’s openness to negotiations with nationalists and Bandera supporters for more than two years now.
        The very fact of negotiations, and moreover, the signing of an agreement with them, means legitimization - recognition of their power as legitimate, after which they will carry out denazification and denazify and demilitarize themselves?
        Any negotiations are bargaining, and bargaining presupposes the readiness of the parties to make mutual concessions, as was the case when signing the Minsk agreements, where, by mutual agreement of Ukrainian nationalists and representatives of the Russian Federation, under the leadership of Mr. Medinsky, weapons, the number of troops, etc. were prescribed.
        Non-negotiable conditions are an ultimatum set by the strongest on the eve of unconditional victory, and victory implies the defeat of the enemy army and peace on the winner’s terms.
  4. -2
    11 August 2024 16: 51
    The situation today: A BANKER IS NOT NEEDED!

    Direct translations of ANYTHING are enough if there is an equivalent (for example, “e-coin”). For the transfer, the RCC is enough, the bank is extra. Trade speculation can be cut in the same way if desired.

    Previously, it was impossible to compare universally on a planetary scale a gram of gold, a mechanic’s standard hour, a kg of grain and a liter of gasoline. Today it is POSSIBLE. Consequence? The usurer and speculator will be as necessary as the coachman and groom in the age of automobiles.

    PS: The Russian Federation and China are planning barter (exchange in kind). Money is an extra link in the EXCHANGE chain, where value equivalents are precisely known.
  5. 0
    12 August 2024 12: 22
    Everything has its stages:
    1. Establish settlements in national currencies, bypassing Swift. There is a platform, it really works. Convince partners to connect.
    2. If partners are afraid of secondary (tertiary) sanctions, and they are, it is necessary to create clearing banks. One per country. And the task of such a bank is only settlements between 2 countries. Let them impose at least a ton of sanctions on him, I don’t care.
    3. If this works, then you can start dealing with BRICS currency. There is already enough technology and financial power; it’s a matter of making a political decision. Now the Anglo-Saxons are torpedoing this topic by any means available, and it is indicated for detailed discussion at the BRICS summit in October in Kazan. They understand that the BRICS currency will appear and the dollar will fly into the abyss. Pre-sanctioned...
  6. 0
    13 August 2024 13: 08
    Can anyone explain the difference between cashless money transfer via smartphone or computer and digital currency?! What kind of stupidity is this?! Non-cash - you no longer need to print money for the entire amount in the country. I don’t understand at all when the price for cash, for example, is cheaper than a bank transfer, since a bank transfer is immediately visible to the tax authorities and the bank takes an expensive percentage for it. Are collectors free of charge?! If you don’t pay a percentage for acquiring, you’ll give it to the collectors. Moreover, the percentage of robberies or simply theft of cash is again not zero. Place two banks on both sides of the border, for example with China, and transport money directly at a distance of 1 km without any electronic bills or reports, since everyone is so scared of sanctions. Although direct commodity exchange between states has long been needed. And no individuals are involved in this.