Current projects of experimental aircraft of the X-series

14 767 43
Current projects of experimental aircraft of the X-series
The X-1 rocket plane is the first X-series aircraft. Photo by the US Department of Defense


US science and industry are constantly searching for new solutions and technologies in the field aviation. To test and develop promising ideas, experimental aircraft with the letter "X" in the index are developed, built and tested. The next representatives of this series are undergoing flight and other tests right now. Time will tell whether they will be able to influence the further development of aviation.



Long story


The first in the X series was the experimental X-1 rocket plane, designed and built by Bell for the U.S. Air Force and NACA. It made its maiden flight in January 1946 and flew for the first time in October. stories aviation exceeded the speed of sound.

Soon the Air Force and NACA began developing new projects with the letter "X". At first, it was only about aircraft with certain features. Then they began experimenting with combat aircraft. missiles. In the sixties, the experimental series was first replenished with projects of rocket and space and other types of technology. In recent decades, experimental UAVs have increasingly appeared under the designation "X".

According to open sources, the US Air Force, NACA/NASA and their contractors have developed about 70 X-series designs to date. About 60 of these prototypes have been built and fully tested.

The experimental series tested various layouts and architectures of aircraft. Non-standard aircraft designs, helicopters, various convertiplanes, etc. were built. Experiments were conducted with new versions of propulsion systems, new equipment was tested, etc.


The X-58 QUESST experimental aircraft. Photo by NASA

Some of the Air Force and NASA experiments were successful. New solutions showed their potential and were implemented in real projects. Other "X" products did not live up to expectations, and their main ideas were not developed.

Although the X-series has developed with varying success, its experience is generally considered positive. Numerous flying laboratories allowed us to evaluate the real potential of various ideas at the experimental stage. Thanks to this, we were able to reject unpromising solutions in a timely manner and focus on successful ones.

Work continues


Experimental aircraft with the letter "X" are still being created and tested. They are used to work out various issues of aviation and space technology development. There are regular reports of the launch of new similar projects or work on existing ones. Also, predictably, there are news about the closure of some works.

At the moment, only a few current "X" projects are known. They implement new ideas in the field of aircraft design and aerodynamics, as well as in the field of advanced control systems. Another development helps to test the potential of unmanned space systems.

It should be noted that until recently NASA and the Air Force had several other experiments in the same areas. All of them have now been discontinued for various reasons, including the successful completion of their tasks.

The Future of Airplanes


In early 2024, Lockheed Martin unveiled the X-58 QUESST (Quiet SuperSonic Technology) experimental aircraft, commissioned by NASA. Its first flight will take place in the coming months.


The X-61A UAV in flight. Photo by Dynetics

The goal of the QUESST program is to find technologies to reduce the noise of a supersonic aircraft. To this end, a high aspect ratio airframe with optimized flow was developed, which creates minimal shock waves and does not allow them to amplify each other.

NASA hopes that the distinctive design of the experimental aircraft will find application in civil aviation. In the future, this could lead to the emergence of supersonic airliners that are quiet enough to be used over land, including populated areas.

Unmanned experiments


Since the mid-2018s, the DARPA Advanced Research Projects Agency has been running the Gremlins program. Its goal is to create a combat UAV of the "faithful wingman" type. In XNUMX, a contract for the full development of such a drone received by the company Dynetics. Its project was assigned the index X-61A.

In November 2019, the prototype Gremlin made its first flight on the external sling of the carrier aircraft. Two months later, the first drop took place, but the onboard instruments did not work correctly, and the X-61A crashed. Only in August was it possible to conduct the first flight according to the full program. The UAV detached from the carrier, completed a training task and returned back.

According to known data, the Air Force and DARPA are currently working on issues of single and group use of drones. The carrier of such equipment is a converted military transport aircraft C-130.

The completion dates for the X-61A project, even approximate ones, are still unknown. In addition, it is unclear what equipment the Pentagon will ultimately order. It may purchase drones from Dynamics in their current form or order the development of a new design based on the accumulated solutions.


X-61A in the process of re-entry. Photo by Dynetics

UAV experiments are also being conducted using the X-62 VISTA (Variable Stability In-flight Simulator Test Aircraft). Previously a training version of the production F-16, it was rebuilt and modernized in 2021.

After replacing the equipment, the X-62 gained the ability to interact with "loyal wingmen." It can exchange data with UAVs, give them instructions, and monitor their work. According to known data, the VISTA aircraft is already participating in tests using various experimental drones.

It is not known when and how such work will be completed, but its goals are quite clear. The Pentagon has long announced its intention to widely introduce “slave” UAVs in the future, as well as to give manned aircraft the ability to control drones.

Experiments in space


The X-series record for duration is held by the X-37 orbital aircraft project. The first version of this product was developed by Boeing in the mid-2006s, and in XNUMX, flight tests in the atmosphere began using a carrier aircraft.

In 2010, the prototype X-37 first flew into space. Since then, two prototypes have completed six space flights lasting from 224 to 908 days. The seventh mission was launched in December 2023 and is still ongoing. Its completion date is unknown.


The X-37 spaceplane after returning from orbit, November 2022. Photo by the U.S. Department of Defense

The X-37 is one of the most secretive programs of the Pentagon and NASA. The goals and objectives of the flights, the payload of the devices and other aspects remain secret. There are reports of various episodes of the devices' activity in orbit, but there is no exact data.

It is assumed that the developments on the X-37 may form the basis for promising projects in the field of military astronautics. However, it is unknown which ideas are being tested and how they will be applied in practice.

Past and Future


All the projects of the "X" series are actually united only by the letter in the index and the desire of their creators to search for and test new solutions. Such activity of the aviation and rocket-space industry has been going on since the middle of the last century and has well-known consequences.

The Pentagon and NASA do not stop searching for new technologies and ideas. In this regard, new X-series projects with certain features are regularly launched. Thus, now the experimental series devices help to work out the issues of using UAVs and optimizing the appearance of supersonic aviation equipment. How these projects will end and how they will affect the further development of American aviation, time will tell.
43 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. + 12
    31 August 2024 05: 05
    Whatever they say about "cut paper with dead presidents", there are real results from financing it. Even the negative ones, Zumwalt, for example, bring positive experience!
    1. +4
      31 August 2024 06: 22
      Whatever they say about "cut paper with dead presidents"
      American banks are very careful to ensure that some of this shredded paper does not get from third countries to the US territory and does not generate inflation with its mass. There is an opinion that this "shredded paper" is somehow marked and is not allowed for use in the US
    2. -10
      31 August 2024 06: 37
      Whatever they say about "cut paper with dead presidents", there are real results from funding it.

      Well, yes... Of course there is, but only for the States and their closest satellites... Everyone else is simply forced to keep their savings in this "cut paper" and sell raw materials for it... No one objects that the States have settled in well, but not everyone likes it... That's why BRICS appeared and I hope that its currency will appear soon... Well, then we'll see... The dollar will certainly live on, but it will become harder for it to live and perhaps someday it will really turn into "cut paper with dead presidents"...
      1. +5
        31 August 2024 10: 35
        The truth is that the world needs one global currency so that people can trade for it and countries with weak economies can keep their savings in it in case of devaluations and food with them.
        And only a currency with a large market for everything from consumer goods to high technology with a stable political system so that the exchange rate does not fluctuate back and forth will be able to displace the dollar.
        Neither the ruble nor the yuan nor anything else is capable of this. The euro was the closest, but it couldn't do it either. Even though it won a share of the market.
        1. -6
          31 August 2024 10: 43
          The truth is that the world needs one global currency so that people can trade for it and countries with weak economies can keep their savings in it in case of devaluations and food with them.

          Seriously...??? And how did humanity manage without the dollar for thousands of years with its national currencies, and then suddenly without the dollar, which is less than two hundred years old, it can't manage... Don't make me laugh...
          1. +7
            31 August 2024 11: 01
            And how did humanity manage for thousands of years without the dollar and its national currencies?

            national symbols were applied to a piece of gold or silver and, if desired, one currency could be melted down into another
          2. +2
            31 August 2024 11: 18
            when the currency was gold/silver everything was simple, but when the currency became cut paper it became unclear why paper was worth anything at all at the same time both currency turnovers increased and operating with tons of gold is also, to put it mildly, inconvenient and gold is needed in other areas and there is no such amount of gold to ensure the trade turnover that has begun, in theory for the amount of dollars that are floating around, the US should have a reserve of gold, silver, diamonds, etc. oil in the end, something that can be exchanged for dollars at any time, I don’t know, maybe that’s how it is
          3. +3
            31 August 2024 13: 18
            With great difficulty. Try to go somewhere in the Balkans or Southeast Asia or Central America with rubles and you will understand how difficult it is to trade there. You may find a common language. But they will rip you off three times as much if you can come to an agreement.
            You are right, the world somehow lived before the dollar, and before the pound, and before the real, and before the Roman sisters, but the world always chose one more optimal currency.
            And if you want to squeeze the dollar flag into your hands. I have outlined the scope of work above. That's all hi
            1. -5
              31 August 2024 13: 24
              And if you want to squeeze the dollar flag into your hands. I have outlined the scope of work above. That's all

              Nothing on Earth in this world lasts forever... Read books on world history and you will realize this... hi
              1. +5
                31 August 2024 15: 07
                As a history teacher, shouldn’t I know that everything in this world is temporary? hi
  2. +3
    31 August 2024 05: 31
    Experimental aircraft with the letter "X" are still being created and tested.

    It is not the devices with the letter "X" that are assigned the letter "X" in the USA, but experimental aircraft.
    For example, the XB-70 Valkyrie is an American experimental bomber with M=3.
  3. -3
    31 August 2024 06: 28
    We had an experimental project "Burya". The American X-37 is a modern development of this project, unlike the giant "Challengers" and "Burans". This is the direction we need to develop. Return stages are one path of development, and a spacecraft is another. For example, the IL-76 takes a spacecraft up the fuselage, rises to the altitude, gains the necessary speed and the spacecraft takes off into space, using the acceleration impulse from the aircraft. After completing the mission in space, it lands like an aircraft. soldier
    1. -4
      31 August 2024 08: 50
      This is how you should launch a missile aircraft based on the FAB-9000 from the "back" of an Il-76. If necessary - to Rzeszow and the Beskid Tunnel.
    2. +6
      31 August 2024 13: 31
      We had an experimental project "Burya". The American X-37 is a modern development of this project.

      The Burya project is a cruise missile that does not go beyond the atmosphere. And the X-37 is an orbital aircraft, a development of the X-20 Dyna Soar. There were similar programs in the USSR (Mikoyan OKB Spiral, etc.)
      1. -3
        31 August 2024 14: 45
        Thank you for pointing out my mistake, I wrote "Storm" and in my head was "Spiral". It's a pity that they stopped working on "Spiral". Imagine now we would have a spaceship that would fly to the ISS twice a month, changing astronauts like a taxi. Four to six passengers.
        By and large, Lavochkin's "Storm" gave impetus to the "Challengers" and "Burans".
        And the greatest success would be if they crossed the "Burya" and "Spiral". At work I spoke with an officer who worked with the "Burya". The reviews were only positive. I asked why they didn't adopt it? It's too expensive to pull two Korolev and Lavochkin systems. And now development is going the way of Lavochkin, "Burya then flew 7 thousand km in a prototype. Then there was a plan to put it into near-earth orbit. soldier
        1. +1
          31 August 2024 14: 52
          Thank you

          You are welcome!
  4. 0
    31 August 2024 06: 31
    Quote: Ryabov Kirill
    experimental aircraft X-58 QUESST (Quiet SuperSonic Technology), created by order of NASA
    This whole QUESST program is designed to combat sonic booms when we break the supersonic barrier. What does NASA have to do with it?
    1. +3
      31 August 2024 06: 51
      At least in money.
      At the very least, in a technology that reduces the load on the glider when crossing a barrier.
      What else is being researched, ask NASA. smile
      1. +2
        31 August 2024 06: 54
        in technology that reduces the load on the glider when crossing a barrier
        The QUESST program is specifically about reducing the sonic boom when crossing a barrier.
        1. -1
          31 August 2024 06: 56
          And the sonic boom doesn’t affect the glider and the insides of the device?
          1. +2
            31 August 2024 07: 00
            And the sonic boom does not affect the glider.
            Of course, it does. I repeat that the QUESST program was created to reduce the sonic boom and is aimed specifically at civil aircraft. The load on the structural elements is a different story.
    2. +1
      31 August 2024 12: 29
      This entire QUESST program is designed to combat sonic booms at the moment of overcoming the supersonic barrier.
      Michel, the Mach cone is formed when the speed of sound is overcome, and then the device drags it along with itself all the time until it reduces the speed to subsonic. So the word "moment" is superfluous here.
      1. 0
        31 August 2024 15: 33
        and then the device drags him along all the time
        In my opinion, the device, on the contrary, drags it in front of itself, creating greater pressure at the very front point of the fuselage. Something similar to an artillery shell
        1. +1
          31 August 2024 16: 14
          The apparatus does not drag anything in front of itself, since the speed of the apparatus is the highest. The situation is completely analogous to the movement of a projectile, especially since the "Mach number" during the period of the fight against cosmopolitanism (late 40s) was to be replaced by the "Maevsky Number", who at the same time as Mach introduced this similarity criterion for the flow around projectiles. One can say "the apparatus drags with itself".
    3. 0
      1 September 2024 22: 10
      What does NASA have to do with it?

      And who pays for this banquet?
      1. +1
        2 September 2024 06: 05
        And who pays for this banquet?
        The banquet is usually paid for by those who benefit from it.
  5. -1
    31 August 2024 09: 15
    The supersonic project is clearly aimed at the winged ones, with such forms the citizen will not work at all and in no way. And yes, having a cheat code for money so as not to experiment on everything in a row, why not, when yes!
  6. -1
    31 August 2024 11: 57
    Quote: Dutchman Michel
    There is a belief that this "cut paper" is somehow marked and is not allowed for use in the US

    There is no need to mark it - it’s just a record on the Federal Reserve server.
    1. 0
      31 August 2024 12: 07
      There is no need to mark it - it's just a record on the Federal Reserve server.
      Dollars intended for circulation in various Nicaraguas, Ugandans and other Ivory Coasts have their own numbers and series and in the event of any crisis, will be immediately cut off from the dollars circulating in the USA. At least, that's what evil tongues say wink
      1. 0
        14 November 2024 22: 13
        Our ruble is completely different, ours is a million more expensive. Mayakovsky.
  7. 0
    31 August 2024 12: 38
    Regarding "Quiet Supersonic". Indeed, Boom Supersonic flew its first demonstrator XB-1 in the spring. It is a single-seat machine with an engine from a Phantom. The aircraft reached an altitude of 3.170 m and a speed of 450 km/h. Such success.
  8. -11
    31 August 2024 12: 39
    I was more amused by the pilot's suit in rubber boots, they are so damn comfortable to pilot in laughing and so the era of manned spaceflight is coming to an end and this proves that NASA can't take idiots from the ISS, so let them parachute from there drinks
    Under the USSR, the Union would have launched in a few hours soldier
    1. +8
      31 August 2024 13: 31
      First of all, it's not a "pilot suit," because the X-37 is, ahem, unmanned. It's ground crew PPE, worn because of the risk of leakage of a fuel vapor component - hydrazine or its derivatives. We wear the same, by the way, when working with this fuel.
      Secondly, the boots of the Sokol emergency rescue spacesuit for Soyuz send you a big hello (see photo) laughing
      Thirdly, when an accident occurred in the Soyuz MS-22 thermal control system, our cosmonauts also got stuck on the ISS, who would have thought that it happens not only to "morons at NASA"! And they returned from the station a year after the launch. And the Starliner astronauts will also be returned by an American ship - Crew Dragon. Only if we had to launch Soyuz MS-23 completely empty, there will still be 9 crew members on top of Crew-2, including Alexander Vladimirovich Gorbunov. By the way, this is already the 5th Russian on Crew Dragon, but apparently Roscosmos did not read your comment and does not know that you can't fly on their ships laughing
      1. The comment was deleted.
    2. The comment was deleted.
      1. The comment was deleted.
        1. The comment was deleted.
    3. +1
      1 September 2024 04: 27
      I understand that you are an expert, since a person in a protective suit was mistaken for the "pilot" of the X-37B. Since you are an expert, please show where and how the "pilot" sits and controls the X-37B.
  9. +3
    31 August 2024 13: 54
    To test and develop promising ideas, experimental aircraft with the letter “X” in the index are developed, built and tested.

    Not all American experimental aircraft had the "X" designation in accordance with the United States Department of Defense aerospace vehicle designation. Before 1971, some were designated in accordance with the List of United States Tri-Service aircraft designations, for example - Douglas D-558-1 Skystreak, some, for secrecy purposes - only the developer index (Piasecki PA-97).
  10. Owl
    0
    31 August 2024 20: 12
    Development of space reconnaissance and unmanned space bomber.
  11. +4
    31 August 2024 20: 16
    Literally, the other day, in VO, with "enthusiasm" and determination, an article about the crisis of aviation thought in our "foreign partner" was "chewed over"... And, even, with pathos, the appearance in the American sky of a copy of the domestic "Su - 35", no more - no less, was assumed... And today a new printed "goodie" from Kirill Ryabov about "the Pentagon and NASA, which do not stop searching for new technologies and ideas in aviation"... In connection with which, there, regularly, new projects of the X-series (experimental aerospace platforms) with these or those features are launched and not a single word about the organization of copying the "Su - 35"... How. there, with them, in general terms, without correspondent reviews of technical "goodies", from Kirill Ryabov, is clear... I repeat, having quoted from F.D. Roosevelt, that big ideas, with huge money, lead to grandiose results... And how are we, "hearty" with the X-series aviation platforms? As an amateur, I'll be curious, what awaits us in the next decade in the aerospace field? It seems that with the "backlog", from socialism, from the USSR - everything is heading towards the end or the technical impossibility of implementing ALL THIS into something flying and surprising, due to the decline of aviation schools and the current frivolous technical readiness of engineering and technical workers and the collapse of complex communications (in the past, "Soviet life") design bureaus, research institutes, experimental production facilities and the aerospace industry, as a whole...
    1. 0
      14 November 2024 22: 28
      Convert supersonic speed into electricity.
  12. 0
    2 September 2024 11: 01
    The most (known) notable project of the X-series is the X-37.
    Regarding the data on its carrying capacity, etc., the author is a bit out of the loop - 900 kilo linear meters. The same Wikipedia contains links to confirm this data, at least these are figures that can be used as a starting point. Although I personally have some skepticism, given the wingspan of 4.5 meters and a takeoff weight of almost 5 tons. But, let's say it's really 900 kilograms. Such a weight probably allows it to take on board 2-3 powerful nuclear warheads specialized for attack from orbit. And this could be a very sweet cherry on top of the BGU cake. Although, most likely, this is one of the possible functions of the device, not the most popular. The Americans have a lot of satellites and their operation eats up a lot of money - of course, they will be concerned about their refueling and repair.
    1. 0
      4 September 2024 21: 15
      Regarding the data on its carrying capacity, etc., the author is a bit out of the loop - 900 kilo running meters. In the same Wiki there are links to confirm this data, at least these are figures that can be used as a starting point.

      Actually, it’s smaller, almost 4 times:
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_X-37#Specifications
      Capacity: 227 kg
      1. 0
        4 September 2024 21: 47
        There we are talking about the device with the letter B - as I understand it, this is an additional equipment or manipulators. The original device did not have this additional equipment, which did not prevent it from flying - apparently they chose a specification for it. Which, however, does not cancel its ability to pull these 900 kg of free weight - if this is a modular specification.
        Although everything is maybe, maybe we just translated it with a J, which is not surprising, the moderation of the Russian segment, even according to current technologies, is frankly disgusting - they much prefer to write articles on political topics...
        1. 0
          2 October 2024 04: 31
          I generally believe that this is the "landing" mass, well, those 900 kg that can be returned from space, since the takeoff mass is pulled by the Atlas 5 launch vehicle, there are from 10 to 18 tons to low orbit, 5 tons is the weight of the ashcan itself, and the rest is as much as can fit in the compartment without fanaticism laughing But once they land, there is a weight limit so that the wings don’t fall off.
  13. 0
    21 December 2024 11: 11
    The only way to breakthrough in aviation is to change the technology of energy conversion of continuous media flow. In simple words, this is a new type of propulsion replacing the principle of the turbine process as a derivative of a banal screw or propeller. Therefore, we observe the chatter and fruitless efforts.