The problem of the "Mongol" invasion of Russia. Part of 4
In the traditional version of the "Tatars" - a mixture of terminators with the SS, who on their unpretentious horses captured a large part of Eurasia, destroying everything in its path, leaving burning ruins from flourishing civilizations and states. From the point of view of the "Eurasians", the "Tatar-Mongols" (their origin is not questioned) were generally friendly to Russia and were with her as part of the Golden Horde in a state of idyllic "symbiosis". There are generally sound facts about the positive influence of the government of Genghis Khan and the first rulers behind him on the vast Asian expanses. In particular, merchants could easily travel great distances without fear of robbers, they were destroyed; a well-organized postal service was created. Northeastern Russia, with the support of Batu, held out in the fight against the western “dogs-knights”.
In general, the Eurasian version is useful in that it dealt a strong blow to the "armor" of the classic history written by the Germans and Westerners for Russia. She showed the deception of the stereotype about the eternal hostility of the “forest” and “steppe”, the incompatibility of the Slavic world with the cultures of the steppe Eurasia. The Westernizers attributed the Slavic world to Europe, but it was subjected to harmful “distortions” by the “steppe”, like the “totalitarianism” of the “Mongolian” rulers. It should be noted that by separating the “forest” and the “steppe” the researchers dealt another strong blow to the true history of Russia-Russia: they excluded many pages from Russian history, for example, with Azov-Black Sea Russia, which in turn was the heir of civilization Sarmatia-Scythia (Secrets of Russian history: Azov-Black Sea Russia and Varangian Russia. Part of 1., Part 2.).
The interpretation of the “Tatar-Mongolian yoke”, which was proposed by the authors of the theory of radical revision of history, “new chronology” - A.T. Fomenko, G.V. Nosovsky and other authors, gained considerable popularity. It must be said that the authors of the “new chronology” used the earlier ideas of the Russian scientist N. A. Morozov. "Fomenkovtsy" revised the traditional chronology in the direction of its reduction, and believe that there is a system of historical counterparts, when some events are repeated in another time and another region. "New chronology" put a lot of noise in the historical and near-historical world, the subversors, in turn, wrote a whole bunch of exposing works.
But, in my opinion, this is not the main thing. The main thing is that the Fomenkovists in their writings published a large number of traces of the presence of Russians in Europe and throughout Eurasia. Although according to the “classic” version of history, the Eastern Slavs (Russians) climbed out of the marshes and forests only somewhere in the period of the 5-6 centuries. (others give an even later date - 7-8 centuries), and have no relation to the "true story", which was in Europe and Asia.
True, having found numerous traces of the Russians' presence in Europe, Fomenko and Nosovsky made a strange conclusion: the Russians, together with the Cossacks and the Turks during the reign of Ivan III, conquered Europe and ruled it for a long time. Europe was part of the Russian Empire. Then, gradually, the Russians were ousted from Europe, and their traces were tried to be destroyed, so that there was no doubt about the greatness of European civilization.
Here you can agree with the last conclusion: the Vatican, the late Masonic orders and lodges really did everything to destroy the traces of the Slavs, the Rus in Europe. But this could not be done completely, because the Russians were not short-term invaders of Europe, as it seems to the supporters of the “new chronology”. There was no conquest of Europe, the Rus were the autochthonous (indigenous) population of Europe. This confirms most of the toponymy in Europe (the name of rivers, lakes, localities, mountains, cities, settlements, etc.). Since ancient times, the Rus have inhabited the expanses of the Balkans, modern Poland, Hungary, Austria, Germany, Northern Italy, and Scandinavia. The process of their assimilation, Christianization, and crowding out from Europe began approximately in the middle of 1, th. er It was the Slavorian tribes that crushed Rome, which was completely rotten (Germanic ”tribes that are counted among the Germans, have nothing to do with them, for example, the“ Germans ”- the vandals are the Venetian Slavs). But the flag of "Roman contagion" was picked up by West Christian Rome, a protracted war began, which lasted a thousand years (and continues to our day, since the "Russian question" has not yet been resolved). Slavs ousted to the east. A significant part of it was destroyed or assimilated, turning into the “Germans”, it was included in the composition of the new Roman and German-Scandinavian nationalities. So, the whole Slavic civilization in the center of Europe - Western (Varyazhskaya) Russia was destroyed. You can read about this in L. Prozorov’s work “Varangian Rus: Slavic Atlantis”. Other Slavs were vaccinated with a virus of Catholicism, making enemies of their brothers. In particular, in this way, the Poles were turned into stubborn enemies of Russia.
The supporters of the “new chronology” did not leave a stone on the stone or the traditional myth of the “Tatar-Mongols”. According to Fomenko, there were no “Tatar-Mongols” at all; by medieval sources they mean “Russians”. The Golden Horde and Russia were part of the great power "Great Tartary", which was predominantly populated by Russians. The invasion of troops by Baty Fomenko and Nosovsky are considered internal wars within one state: between Russians and Tatars of Russia on the one hand, and Russians, Cossacks and Horde Tatars, on the other. The "Great Tartary" (Big Russia) was split into two fronts, into two rival dynasties, the western and the eastern. The eastern Russian "Horde" was the army that took stubborn cities by storm, broke down the resistance of the proud princes and demanded "tithe" (a tax on the maintenance of the troops).
The positivity of the “new chronology” is that it shows the absence of “Mongols from Mongolia” in the expanses of Russia. It proves the fact that the true history of Russia is, in many ways, circumcised, distorted in favor of the West.
The third version is offered by supporters of the idea that Russia as a state and geopolitical reality always existed, and within the borders of Northern Eurasia and since ancient times it was inhabited by the Ruses whom the sources know under different names - Aryans, Scythians, Tauroskifs, Sarmatians, Roksolans, Varangians-Veneds “Moguls” (“powerful”), etc. For example, in the work of N. I. Vasilyeva, Yu. D. Petukhov “Russian Scythia” it is noted that in the territory of Northern Eurasia - from the Pacific Ocean and the borders of China to the Carpathians and Black sea anthropological, cultural (spiritual and material I am a culture), often political unity can be traced from the times of the Neolithic to the Bronze Age (the time of the Proto-Indo-Europeans, Aryans) to the Middle Ages.
According to Yu. D. Petukhov, the author of a number of fundamental studies on the history of the Rus, vast forest-steppe spaces from the Northern Black Sea region through the Southern Urals and to Southern Siberia, modern Mongolia, which were given by the Western historians to the “Mongol-Tatars” in the 12-14 centuries in fact belonged to the so-called. "Skifosibirskomu world." The Europoids mastered huge spaces from the Carpathians to the Pacific before the wave of Aryan-Indo-Europeans left during the 2 millennium BC. er to Iran and India. The memory of tall, fair-haired and light-eyed warriors has been preserved both in China and in neighboring regions. The military elite, nobles of Transbaikalia, Khakassia and Mongolia were Europoids-Indo-Europeans. It is from here that the legend of the Russian-breed and the blue-eyed (green-eyed) Genghis Khan-Temuchin originated.
It was these heirs of the great northern civilization - Scythia, that were the only real military force that could conquer China, Central Asia (which had previously been within their sphere of influence), the Caucasus, Russia and other regions. Later they were dissolved among the Mongoloids and the Turks, giving a passionate impulse to the Turks, but they retained their memory as fair-haired and light-eyed “giants” (for the less physically developed Mongoloids they were giants, like the Russians of Kiev, Chernihiv and Novgorod for Arab travelers) .
Some of these Scythians came to Russia. Anthropologically and genetically, these late Scythians were the same Ruses as the Russians living in Ryazan, Vladimir or Kiev. Outwardly, they were distinguished by the manner of dressing - “the Scythosiberian animal style,” their own dialect of the Russian language, and the fact that they were largely pagans. Therefore, the chroniclers and called them "nasty", ie, pagans. That is the key to the phenomenon that the three-century “Mongolian” yoke did not make the slightest anthropological changes in the indigenous population of Russia. Therefore, the Scythian Russes of the Horde (the word "horde" is a distorted Russian word "clan", "glad", in the German language is preserved as "order, ordnung") quickly found a common language with the majority of Russian princes, were related, framed. It is doubtful that in the same way Rusichs would begin to build relationships with absolute strangers-Mongoloids.
The Horde and the Rus fought together on the Western Front: in 1241, Batu led troops into Western Europe, and his army included Russians from North-Eastern and Southern Russia. The troops of Baidar and Ordu fought in Poland, captured Lublin, Zavikhost, Sandomierz, the Malopolsky militia were defeated near Tursk, the Krakow and Sandomir regiments tried to close the route to Krakow, but were defeated in March 18 March and Shkalko 19 respectively. Krakow was captured. Poland was completely conquered, Boleslav V fled to Hungary. Interestingly, the Knights Templar helped the Tatars in this campaign, they acted as guides, translators and even military commanders. On April 9, in the battle of Legnica, the soldiers of Batu defeated the combined Polish-German forces. At this time, Batu's troops defeated the Hungarians of the Ugrians. 11 April at p. Shaio Russian-Tatar troops defeated the army of Bela IV, the Hungarian king fled to the Austrians. Under the rule of the "Mongols" was the whole Danube part of Hungary. At the same time, Batu entered into a strategic alliance with the emperor of the Holy Roman Empire Frederick II Hohenstaufen against the Guelphs and Rome (as early as 1239, the emperor was excommunicated by Pope Gregory IX from the church).
In 1242, the Batu army continued its offensive. The Mongols crossed the Danube and besieged Buda, Fehervar, Esztergom, Nitra, Bratislava and a number of other Hungarian cities. Corps Kadana ravaged Croatia, took Zagreb. Detachments of Batu entered Serbia, Bosnia, Bulgaria. In the future it was planned to invade Italy and France. However, the campaign did not take place, for political reasons, Batu had to turn the troops.
The actions of Alexander Yaroslavich — his victories over the Swedes and German knights — look completely random in this light. His fraternity with Sartak, the eldest son of Batu. There is information that the Horde troops helped Alexander in his fight with the enemies on the north-western borders of Russia.
This version immediately puts in place many pieces of jigsaw puzzles that do not find the answer in the traditional version. Siberian Scythians had a many thousand years developed spiritual and material culture, a production base, military traditions (similar to the later Cossacks) and could form an army capable of crushing China and reach the Adriatic Sea. The invasion of the Scythian-Siberian pagan russes sucked into its mighty wave of pagan-turkish, pagan-polovtsy and alan. Later, the Siberian Rus created the Great “Mongolian” empire, which began to degenerate and degrade only after the growing Islamization, which was facilitated by the influx of a significant number of Arabs into the Golden (White) Horde. Islamization has become the main prerequisite for the death of a mighty empire. It collapsed into many fragments, among which Moscow Russia began to rise, which would restore the empire. Although back in the time of Mamaia, the pagan beliefs were widespread in the Golden Horde. Thus, in “The Tale and the Mamai Massacre”, a literary monument of the 15 century, gods are worshiped by the “Tatars”: Perun, Salavat, Rekly, Horse and Mohammed. Thus, simple "Tatars" worshiped Perun and Hors. After the battle on Kulikovo field, Moscow gradually comes to the fore, as the capital of the empire. In about a century and a half, the new center will be able to restore the main core of the empire. Thus, in the 16-19 centuries, the Russian state did not conquer foreign lands, but returned territories that had been part of northern civilization from time immemorial.
In this light, it is not at all surprising that, before the 16-17 centuries, and sometimes up to the 18 century, most of Eurasia in Europe was called Great Scythia (Sarmatia) or “Great Tartaria”. The sources of that time identified the ancient Scythians-Sarmatians and the contemporary Russian Slavs, considering that the whole forest-steppe Eurasia, as before, was inhabited by one people. So not only authors who used literary sources, but also travelers believed. The Roman humanist of the 15 century, Julius Lat, traveled to Scythia, visited Poland, on the Dnieper, at the mouth of the Don, and described the life and customs of the Scythians. The traveler spoke about the "Scythian" honey and Braga, how the "Scythians" sitting at the oak tables, proclaim toasts in honor of the guests, wrote down a few words (turned out to be Slavic). He said that "Scythia" extends to the borders of India, where the "Khan of the Asian Scythians" rules.
Arabian (Egyptian) historian of the middle of the 14 of the century, Al-Omari, reporting on “the lands of Siberia and Chulymanskiy”, reports a strong situation and that there are beautiful, remarkably folded people who have white face and blue eyes. In China, under the rule of the Yuan dynasty (1260-1360-s) in the capital Khanbalik (Beijing), the guard, recruited from Yasov, Alans and Russians, was of great importance. Some of the names of “Alanian” commanders are also known - Nikolay, Ilie-Bagatur, Yuvashi, Arselan, Kurdji (George), Dmitry. The Slavic pagan name was worn by the renowned commander "The Eyed" Bayan. In 1330, the emperor Wen-tszun (Kubilai's great-grandson) created a Russian unit in 10 of thousands of warriors - in translation from Chinese to Russian, its name sounds like “Always true Russian Guard”. Given the fact that by the middle of the 14 century, the former united “Mongolian” empire had collapsed, it is hard to imagine that thousands of Russian soldiers came from China from Vladimir and Moscow Russia. Most likely they were from closer places. So, Chinese Wang Hoi and Yu Tan-Jia, who lived in the 14 century, wrote: “Russians are descendants of the ancient Usun people”. And the Usuns are Siberian Scythians, who were called Issedons in ancient Europe (they occupied the territories of the Southern Urals and Siberia).
Before the intervention from outside, the national historical tradition directly elevated the origin of the Russian people to the Alans-Sarmatians. The author of the “Scythian history” A. Lyzlov identified the Sarmats-Savromats with the Russians. In the History of V.N. Tatishchev and M. Lomonosov, it is reported that the Russians came from the Sarmatian Roksalans on the one hand, and from the Vendians-Wends on the other.
Summing up this article it must be said that almost the entire history of Western Europe is a myth. Winners, i.e., the West’s masters simply ordered the story for themselves, tried to clean up or hide unnecessary pages. But we do not need their myth, you can not build your power on other people's tales. We must write such a history of Russia-Russia, which will educate sages, warriors and creators, and not losers and "eternal slaves" who are under the yoke of the Khazars, the "Mongols", the "Reds". It is quite reasonable and expedient to support the version of the "Mongol-Tatar" invasion, which will be beneficial and useful to Russia and its peoples, and not other people's inventions.
- Alexander Samsonov
- Russian land before the Batu invasion. The problem of the "Mongol" invasion of Russia
Russian land before the Batu invasion. The problem of the "Mongol" invasion of Russia. Part of 2
The problem of the "Mongol" invasion of Russia. Part of 3
The problem of the "Mongol" invasion of Russia. Part of 4
Information