Artillery of the Russian Airborne Forces

68
Artillery of the Russian Airborne Forces
Crews of D-30 guns during exercises, 2021


Russian airborne troops have all the necessary weapons and equipment to operate in isolation from the main forces. In particular, they have developed and fairly numerous artillery. Towed and self-propelled systems of a number of types are in service. Some of them have been in service for a long time, while others have only begun to enter the troops in recent years.



Artillery in the troops


In terms of functions and tasks, airborne artillery does not differ from the artillery of the ground forces. Its main task is fire support for landing formations in various conditions. Gunners must be prepared to engage a wide range of targets on the battlefield.

The existing airborne and airborne assault divisions of the Airborne Forces each have one artillery regiment. Each regiment includes several artillery battalions with different equipment and weapons. In addition, the Airborne Forces have several separate air assault brigades, which are also equipped with artillery battalions.

The armament and equipment of airborne artillery battalions are varied. The units are equipped with both towed and self-propelled systems of various classes. Some formations have recently been re-equipped using the latest models.

According to available information, several artillery units of the Airborne Forces are currently participating in the Special Operation to protect Donbass. They use their weapons to solve assigned combat missions and cause damage to the enemy. Since the start of the operation, the airborne artillery has demonstrated excellent training and the high potential of the available equipment.

Mastered systems


Some of the airborne artillery weapons appeared and entered the troops back in Soviet times. Thanks to regular repairs and upgrades, such material remains serviceable.


Mortarmen of one of the Airborne Forces formations, 2020.

One of the most popular weapons in the Airborne Forces is the 122-mm howitzer 2A18/D-30. This is an easy-to-use weapon that can be transported by air, including by parachute landing. The howitzer uses a wide range of projectiles and can hit targets at a distance of more than 15 km.

Also in the units there are at least several dozen towed 2B23 “Nona-K” guns of 120 mm caliber. This system uses domestic and foreign mortar mines, and in addition, it produces its own line of shells. The firing range of a conventional projectile reaches 8,8 km.

A key place in the artillery weapons system of the Airborne Forces is occupied by the 2S9 “Nona-S” self-propelled gun and its modifications. This combat vehicle carries a “universal” 120 mm gun that functions as a cannon, howitzer and mortar. In terms of fire characteristics, the Nona-S is similar to the Nonu-K, but has the advantage of an armored self-propelled chassis.

The Airborne Forces also widely use transportable and portable mortars of the main domestic calibers - 82 and 120 mm. They complement other weapons and enhance firepower within a radius of several kilometers.

New generation


In the mid-1910s, the domestic defense industry presented several new artillery projects for ground and airborne troops. Some of these models have now begun to enter service. the army.


Column SAO 2S9 "Nona-S"

About a year ago, in July 2023, the Rostec state corporation announced the delivery of the first production batch of 2S41 Drok self-propelled combat vehicles to the customer. This product is positioned as a portable/carryable mortar and is intended for the Airborne Forces. Apparently, the first production batch was transferred to one of the airborne formations last year.

The 2S41 product is a K-4386 Typhoon-VDV armored vehicle with a combat module equipped with an 82-mm mortar. The second gun of this caliber is transported by vehicle in disassembled form. In essence, this is a replacement for the existing transportable 82 mm mortar, characterized by increased mobility.

As a modern replacement for the Nona-S, a 120-mm “universal” self-propelled gun 2S42 “Lotos” has been developed. It was previously reported that its testing had been completed and mass production would soon begin. News the start of supplies of equipment to the troops has not yet been reported.

“Lotos” is built on the BMD-4M chassis, which should simplify operation and maintenance. A new weapon with the functions of a howitzer, cannon and mortar was used. Due to the increased barrel length, the main fire characteristics have increased significantly, while the range of tasks solved has not changed in comparison with the Nona.

Overall potential


Thus, the Russian Airborne Forces have developed artillery in quantitative, qualitative and organizational terms. Units and formations with guns of various types are ready to solve various tasks, to support their forces and to defeat the enemy.


Self-propelled mortar 2S41 "Drok"

The existing artillery weapon system of the Airborne Forces meets modern requirements and is constantly evolving. New models with certain features are being created and brought into service. Their appearance has a positive effect on both the technical condition of the parks and the combat effectiveness of troops as a whole.

All available and expected weapons in the army together form a multi-component system that provides impact on the enemy over a wide range of ranges. The use of such a system or its components has a positive effect on the results of the combat work of the Airborne Forces.

In the current weapons system, the shortest-range weapons are 82-mm mortars. They are capable of attacking targets at a distance of 85 to 3100 m and using different types of mines. Until recently, 82-mm systems were only portable, but now there is also a self-propelled one.

Mortars of 120 mm caliber are superior to 82 mm products in all respects. They fire a conventional mine at 7,1 km and show a higher power of ammunition. Mortars of traditional appearance are widely represented in this caliber.

120-mm systems also include self-propelled guns “Nona-S” or “Lotos”. They perform the functions of mortars, guns and howitzers. The new SAO 2S42, depending on the ammunition used and the operating mode, hits targets at ranges of 12-13 km.


120-mm SAO 2S42 “Lotos”

With all this, the longest-range weapon in the airborne artillery remains the traditional howitzer - the D-30, capable of firing at a range of 15 km or more.

In accordance with the characteristic requirements of the Airborne Forces, all artillery systems in service have limited dimensions and weight. They are suitable for transporting military transport aviation and for parachute landing.

Thanks to this, the Airborne Forces have a large and developed artillery force that can solve a full range of tasks to defeat enemy targets and support their troops. It should be noted that in some characteristics, the Airborne Forces artillery is inferior to similar systems of the ground forces. But at the same time, it has advantages in the form of greater mobility and the ability to quickly transfer to the desired area, including over long distances.

Special Features


Airborne troops play an important role in the Russian armed forces. They are assigned special tasks that require special capabilities. This affects the composition and equipment of both all airborne forces and their artillery units.

The Airborne Forces' own artillery has guns and self-propelled guns of various types with a wide range of characteristics. The effectiveness of such a weapon system has been repeatedly demonstrated during past exercises, and is now being tested in real combat operations.
68 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +5
    29 August 2024 04: 43
    Russian airborne troops have all the necessary weapons and equipment for actions in isolation from the main forces.
    belay What nonsense is that. Communications, reconnaissance, drones...
    .in the airborne artillery there remains a howitzer of a traditional appearance - D-30, capable of firing at 15 km
    recourse The amers have three titanium axes, which are more suitable for their purpose and will be lighter. feel
    1. D16
      +6
      29 August 2024 07: 48
      titanium three axes, more suitable for the purpose and will be lighter feel

      The M777 is a ton heavier. The landing party is dropped onto an unprepared enemy defense. Why do they need big guns? Mobility, weight, and the weight of the ammo are what matters there.
      1. +5
        29 August 2024 10: 27
        M777 was created for territory control, for anti-guerrilla warfare. On the one hand, air transportability so that the gun could be dropped by the main standard transport helicopter to the point, and on the other hand, the standard caliber is 155 mm.
        Yes, do they really drop D-30s with a parachute? Well, you dropped the landing force, the enemy woke up, pulled up artillery and with impunity mixed the landing force with the ground.
        1. +7
          29 August 2024 15: 41
          Both the D-30 and its tractors are airborne. Look, there are many pictures of howitzers prepared for airdrop and the same 66s on platforms with parachute packs. The crew is airdropped separately, after landing they gather together, as luck would have it.
          Another thing is that in a combat situation this does not happen now.
          1. 0
            29 August 2024 15: 44
            I suspect the BC is flying on a separate platform. How many sorties are needed to drop a D-30 battery with a standard BC? Maybe, in these times, it would be better to use drones for the same drop weight?
            1. +3
              29 August 2024 16: 09
              Still, artillery and drones do not replace but complement each other, so it is better to take both.
            2. +2
              30 August 2024 07: 55
              The D-30 ammo capacity when dropped by parachute is 16 shells.
              If memory serves, there's not much there.
              1. +1
                31 August 2024 11: 39
                When the OP of any howitzer is taken, approximately the same BC in the tractor. To repel the attack while the position is being equipped. Only then more shells are brought in. In already arranged cellars.
        2. D16
          +2
          29 August 2024 18: 34
          Yes, is the D-30 really dropped with a parachute?

          They drop it on their platform. I'm not a fan of the D-30 for landing. IMHO, mobility is more important to them than firing range. Nona, Lotus, Drok - that's what you need for a quick change of positions.
          1. +2
            31 August 2024 11: 41
            If the landing force has to quickly change its position, things are bad.
            1. D16
              0
              31 August 2024 16: 31
              Quote: stankow
              If the landing force has to quickly change its position, things are bad.

              Any artillery will have a hard time if it does not change positions in a timely manner. If there is a war with a technically advanced enemy, of course.
              1. +1
                31 August 2024 16: 39
                A well-dug-in and camouflaged gun or mortar can stand in one position for weeks. Sometimes performing fire missions. Until the front moves forward. We look at the video from the SVO - and the net is equipped, and the cells, dugouts nearby. Where to change the position? And settle in again? Oh, the enemy found out the coordinates? So he saw his own too. Is he shooting? Okay, they will answer him, shut up.
                1. D16
                  0
                  31 August 2024 17: 04
                  Pancet or similar has arrived. How much will determining the coordinates of the launch vehicle give you if it was folded after launch?
                  Watch the video from SVO

                  It's just that the Ukies are in a bad way with their artillery, means of overcoming our air defense and long-range drones. That's why we can afford to bury towed artillery. The Ukies are running out of it as a class.
                  1. 0
                    1 September 2024 10: 26
                    Where does this "end as a class"? Towed? In the Ukrainian Armed Forces? So much the worse. But anyway, judging by the reports of destroyed equipment, the ratio of towed to self-propelled is quite preserved. Even the Soviet equipment is not finished yet. In the reports, D-30, MT-12 and D-20 pop up every evening.
                    1. D16
                      +1
                      1 September 2024 16: 29
                      At first there was only Soviet, then imported post-Soviet, then imported licensed, assembled around the world, then M109 and M777 and their predecessors also assembled around the world. All the same, licensed and Soviet will surface. There are many of them. The destruction of self-propelled guns is determined by the presence of reconnaissance in their air and the ability to track their movements.
                      1. +1
                        1 September 2024 22: 43
                        I hope after the war there will be interesting research - how the ratio of Western to Soviet equipment in the Ukrainian Armed Forces changed and within what limits. Then we will judge how the West "helps". And whether it is worth contacting them.
      2. +5
        29 August 2024 16: 10
        Quote: D16
        The landing party is dropped onto an unprepared enemy defense. Why do they need big guns?

        To survive until the army arrives.
        Quote: D16
        There, mobility, weight and the weight of the BC are what really matter.

        Only mobility? One of the tasks of the landing force is to hold important points deep in the enemy's defense until the ground troops arrive. That is, to quickly reach them, knocking down the barriers, and take up defense.
        Without normal artillery, this defense will be a shooting range for the Airborne Forces, where the paratroopers will be the target.
        1. D16
          -2
          29 August 2024 18: 46
          Without normal artillery, this defense will be a shooting range for the Airborne Forces, where the paratroopers will be the target.

          And powerful but slow-moving artillery will become fodder for aviation or the same Hymers.
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. 0
      10 September 2024 10: 12
      Quote: Mavrikiy
      The Americans have three titanium axes

      Made of Russian titanium Yes
  2. +2
    29 August 2024 07: 10
    We were told that it could shoot.
    But I would like to know which of these can hit the target?
    In modern combat, online adjustments are important.
    And here everything comes down to secure communication systems and display of combat information.
    Without a connection with technical means of reconnaissance and adjustment, all of this will be big targets for enemy drones.
    1. 0
      29 August 2024 15: 47
      Everything listed in the article can and does hit the target even without a secure connection and online network.
      Shooting and adjustment of ground artillery is always carried out in real time with target observation by various means. Secure communication is, of course, better, but to say, for example, "sight less than 5 to the left of 0-03", a regular radio station or TA is enough. Let them listen, who is interested
      1. +2
        29 August 2024 15: 54
        So, a tanker has to go somewhere, find infantry there, negotiate with their lieutenant to get a spotter, sort out the frequencies of their radios, the spotters go to move out, maybe even launch their drone, give the tankers the command to start, we see everything. The tankers get their task, go in the right direction, the spotters find something, tell them. The tanker reports to his superiors, there is a target. The superiors give the task to reconnaissance to clarify whether this is the target that is needed.
        And at that time ...
        1. +4
          29 August 2024 16: 15
          No, the tankers, or rather the artillerymen, send their lieutenant to the infantry with communications, and the infantry simply tells this lieutenant in their own infantry language, “calm down that ‘bad’ man,” and the artilleryman in the infantry’s combat formations then translates this into a command to the supporting artillerymen or tankers.
      2. +1
        31 August 2024 11: 54
        That's right. And when the last 3 thousand are selected and the fugitives are defeated, then there is no one on the other side to listen to the communication between the OP and the NP. Everyone lies at the bottom of the trench and regrets that they were too lazy to deepen it at least another meter at night.
    2. +1
      31 August 2024 11: 48
      Kuziming Everything is based on the amount of metal that you can deliver to the opponent per minute. And here drones lose by three orders of magnitude. That is, by 1000 times. Where drones release a kilogram, artillery dumps a ton. With all the consequences for the enemy. Get used to it.
  3. +1
    29 August 2024 07: 17
    What nonsense is this hurray patriot writing?
  4. +3
    29 August 2024 07: 58
    The last time the VDV were used en masse as VDV was during the Great Patriotic War. And all three operations, Vyazemskaya and Demyanskaya in 1942 and Dnieper in 1943, ended in failure.
    In modern conditions, mass landing is not possible. And for small helicopter landings, the Airborne Forces do not need. These are rather tasks for special forces.
    All the thousands of units of special combat equipment are more expensive and worse than infantry. And the war teaches our generals nothing. They are unteachable.
    1. -1
      29 August 2024 09: 36
      In modern conditions, mass landing is not possible.
      You are mistaken - "impossible" in this case is written together. But everything else is correct. Margelov pushed through the concept of the Airborne Forces in the 50-60s, when mass landings were still possible, but MANPADS were developed in the late 60s and they buried Margelov's ideas, no matter how great he is now called.
      1. +4
        29 August 2024 09: 46
        You forgot what a big country we live in. If the conventional Mongols rush across the border on their horses, or other Asians, then quickly transferring troops in addition to those we have in Siberia and the Far East, and there are not many of them anyway, and they are spread out over a huge territory, will be very problematic. In such a case, transferring a couple of airborne divisions over our territory under some kind of cover, but still air defense and with fighter cover is valuable.
        1. +2
          29 August 2024 09: 50
          then quickly transferring troops in addition to those we have in Siberia and the Far East, of which there are already few, and they are spread out over a huge territory, will be very problematic.
          That's what the VTA is for, don't confuse the VDV with armored vehicles with aluminum armor and full-fledged motorized riflemen, which the VTA will be transferring. And of course, no airborne mass landings - this is the forerunner of today's tank show-off biathlons.
          1. +4
            29 August 2024 10: 21
            In 2022, the BTR-2a, with a larger troop compartment and 82 times lower cost, was transferred to Kazakhstan along with the BMD-3.
            1. +1
              29 August 2024 16: 14
              Quote: Ivan Seversky
              In 2022, the BTR-2a, with a larger troop compartment and 82 times lower cost, was transferred to Kazakhstan along with the BMD-3.

              He-he-he... I'll tell you more - the 45th separate separate brigade of special forces received BTR-80s ("clean" and AM) when it was still a regiment. But for special forces, parachute landing is even more important than for airborne divisions.
          2. +1
            31 August 2024 11: 57
            The VTA cannot transfer motorized infantry. Their equipment is not included in the plane. Motorized riflemen - only railway. Without their own tanks and artillery, a division/brigade will not go into battle on BMPs alone.
        2. +3
          29 August 2024 10: 04
          There is a lot of confusion here between equipment adapted for parachute drops and equipment adapted for rapid airlift from point A to point B.
          And for information - the main and only VTA aircraft produced by us was adapted (created) to the dimensions and airborne equipment drop.
          1. +1
            29 August 2024 11: 35
            I mean that there were no global parachute landings, there are none and there will not be. And regarding the "only VTA aircraft" - the latest modification of the IL-76-400 is essentially a new aircraft. Not the one that was shown at Le Bourget in 1971 and not the one that was mass-produced to replace the AN-12.
            1. +1
              29 August 2024 11: 44
              The fuselage of this aircraft has remained the same in terms of dimensions. The MD version is only longer. In terms of GP, it can lift the MBT, but in terms of dimensions - either not or with great difficulty. And, for comparison, the Chinese M-20 (I think) already has a wider cabin.
              1. 0
                29 August 2024 16: 20
                Quote: Zaurbek
                In terms of GP, it can lift the MBT, but in terms of dimensions, it either can’t or will do so with great difficulty.

                The T-72 with its side screens removed literally fits into the cargo cabin opening at the limit of its width.

                If I remember correctly, in practice, the transportation of T-72 in Il-76 was tested in India.
                1. 0
                  29 August 2024 17: 19
                  That's what I wrote...GP allows...but with exercises
  5. -1
    29 August 2024 09: 01
    It seems that after the collapse of the USSR, the Russian army has completely neglected the development of artillery.
    1. +2
      29 August 2024 16: 22
      Quote from: d.zacharith
      It seems that after the collapse of the USSR, the Russian army has completely neglected the development of artillery.

      The Airborne Forces are not an army. They have their own pride.
      In Soviet times, all normal artillery divisions VDV - this is 6 (six) D-30. The rest are gun-and-throwers ("Nonas") and mortars.

      It was not for nothing that in Afghanistan, when the 345th separate airborne regiment's staffing levels were brought into line with reality, the regiment's artillery division was "inverted" - "No" was left with one battery, but three batteries received D-30s.
  6. +2
    29 August 2024 09: 12
    I wonder who shoots from a D-30 at 15 km or more?
    1. -3
      29 August 2024 10: 01
      there was a corrective projectile, it would have been possible to continue shooting
      1. +2
        29 August 2024 10: 58
        There is an active-reactive projectile, there is also a special one, the entire full range of non-lethal barrel artillery. This weapon also until recently formed the basis of the field artillery of the Ground Forces, the equivalent of the AK rifle.
        1. -4
          29 August 2024 11: 08
          In NATO, the equivalent is a 105mm howitzer gun.
          The Americans are replacing it with the lightweight 155mm M777.
          The trend is to get a titanium 30mm MSTA or Coalition in the weight of an iron D152.
    2. +2
      31 August 2024 12: 07
      Nobody shoots at 15 km. There are no interesting targets at such a distance. And there are plenty of targets in front of the motorized infantry. At a distance of 2-5 km. The dispersion is less than any target. Zero in the reference point, transfer the fire, they will thank you from the heart.
  7. -4
    29 August 2024 10: 00
    The Airborne artillery, as a mobile force, needs to follow the American path with lightweight 152mm howitzers (like the M777) and Himars-type systems on 6x6 and 8x8 chassis. Tornado-S prototypes with 6 300mm tubes on a Kamaz 8x8 chassis have been on display at exhibitions for a long time, but they are not being developed. Ideally, a launcher for 1 Iskander BR should be made on the same Kamaz. All this will dramatically increase the power of the Airborne Forces.
    1. +2
      29 August 2024 13: 42
      The Airborne Forces don’t need a long arm for free because they simply won’t be able to provide reconnaissance.
      120/122 mm will be more than enough for them. We need to focus on increasing accuracy and reconnaissance at 20-30 km.
      Either reform completely. Or competently apply what we have.
      1. -2
        29 August 2024 13: 44
        It is clear that reform is needed. And rearmament with normal equipment.
        And reconnaissance means are also needed. And connection with reconnaissance from various RC means (aircraft and satellites) too. Instead of BMD4 - BMP-4...etc.
        1. +2
          29 August 2024 14: 02
          If you decide to change it, you can at least assign a regular Sarmat. But for now, you need to solve the problems of today.
          1. 0
            29 August 2024 17: 46
            That's what I'm writing - get rid of the BMD and issue the BMP3M... the cost is 1 BMD for 2 BMP...
    2. 0
      31 August 2024 12: 15
      Zaurbek Russia has a lightweight 152 mm howitzer like the 777 - the Pat-B. But the Tornado and Iskander are not needed by the Airborne Forces at all. After landing, the targets themselves approach the landing force, up to a direct fire distance. A long range is not needed, but more shells. That's why the Airborne Forces have 122 mm and even 120, or even 82 mm. 152 is too much, you can't take much.
      1. 0
        31 August 2024 15: 30
        777 is a full-fledged howitzer... PAT-B is a ersatz gun...
        I'm talking about the approach.
        1. 0
          31 August 2024 15: 32
          Different weapons, different tactical niches, different design approaches.
          1. 0
            31 August 2024 15: 39
            PAT b is a short 152mm barrel on the BMD 3/4 chassis.
            Let them first figure out the chassis, then (from the experience of the SVO) the characteristics of the howitzer itself and the length of its barrel.
            And everything will become clear.
            1. +1
              31 August 2024 15: 59
              No, no, the Pat-B is towed. The BMD won't carry it. The 152 mm barrel is mounted on a D-30 carriage. To cope with the doubled recoil, they installed a huge muzzle brake. The military turned away in horror. The 777 is an even bigger compromise. The barrel is set high to ensure movement at high angles. The brake and recuperator are complex and fragile, hydraulics, hoses, wires are everywhere, a godsend for fragmentation and cluster shells. There is no shield. The barrel balancing device is another headache. And the loading is terribly slow with the help of two crew members and a twisting ram. Because the breech is at eye level. Etc. But it hangs proudly under the helicopter. Sometimes he even shoots, at extreme distances, signaling to the bandits that that's it, we're slowly dispersing. You're in the mountains, our patrol is at the base, no one was hurt laughing
  8. -3
    29 August 2024 10: 20
    The calibers mentioned in the article do not contain cluster munitions. It is their production and design that must be addressed.
    1. 0
      29 August 2024 13: 46
      3VO32 cluster mine with cumulative submunitions.
      I don't remember the index with anti-infantry.
      Nona can work for them.
      And it should be in 122 too.
      1. -4
        29 August 2024 13: 47
        Is it in production and in service? And what is there in the 122mm caliber, other than fantasy and fiction?
        1. 0
          29 August 2024 13: 53
          It is in production.
          Whether they apply it or not, who can say.
          122 I didn't say what is, I said what should be. It's just ours or not ours.
          1. -1
            29 August 2024 14: 31
            Why should the Ukrainians remain silent? And our fighters even show Korean and Iranian ammunition, which they should have kept quiet about.
            In general, the 122 mm caliber itself is too small for submunitions.
            1. +1
              29 August 2024 15: 15
              Well, 3VO32 contained 30 submunitions with 100 mm penetration. I think that's a lot.
              In general, the manufacturers call the legacy of the USSR in 120 mm caliber an analogue of 152 mm. Like comparable.
              And if you look at the ammunition itself, it is usually long. The weapon is low-impulse. The range is short. The projectile is long and heavy. Apparently, that is why they charge wages.
              So it seems quite logical.
  9. 0
    29 August 2024 14: 25
    As far as I know, our motorized rifle battalions are air transportable. And they are air-dropped if they need to be transferred somewhere. It seems that the Airborne Forces are not needed, there is no such stupid enemy around.
  10. +2
    29 August 2024 21: 24
    I want to say about the Airborne Forces - they are professionals, they even held regular night exercises before the SVO. But in the SVO they participate as regular motorized riflemen, only without normal (powerful, from 152 caliber, mobile) artillery. And they move on tin cans with weak protection. Therefore, the Airborne Forces units must be supported by tanks and normal long-range artillery in the form of the Msta.
    1. +1
      30 August 2024 07: 19
      Quote: Nikolay293
      Therefore, airborne units must be supported by tanks and normal long-range artillery in the form of the Msta.

      Now the Airborne Forces have all of this.
  11. -1
    30 August 2024 15: 59
    The necessity of the existence of the Airborne Forces in the current situation has already been discussed several times at VO.
    Parachute landings are practically never used, especially with the mass landing of armored vehicles and artillery pieces.
    Military transport aviation can simultaneously transport one parachute regiment with standard weapons, so the maximum number of "classic" airborne forces is two divisions consisting of four parachute regiments and two artillery regiments.
    The main directions are strengthening troop groups in the North or in the Far East.
    These two divisions should contain all the airborne equipment BMD-4M, BTR RAKUSHKA, SAO NONA, BMD-3M, SAM, D-30, airborne vehicles.

    5-6 airborne regiments/brigades should be “landed” on helicopters to form rapid reaction forces on their basis.
    Provide them with light mobile equipment (ATVs, snowmobiles, motorcycles, boats...) for transporting weapons (ATGMs, AGS, mortars, machine guns, MANPADS, ammunition...).

    It turns out that the entire Airborne Forces are 10-12 regiments/brigades, which is consistent with the capabilities of the economy and the needs of the Ministry of Defense.
  12. -1
    31 August 2024 09: 45
    In the Russian Federation, the Airborne Forces are used as slightly more trained infantry, what the hell are paratroopers???
  13. 0
    31 August 2024 11: 33
    And not a word about Octopus?
    ................
  14. +1
    31 August 2024 12: 20
    Quote: Sergey Alexandrovich
    The calibers mentioned in the article do not contain cluster munitions. It is their production and design that must be addressed.

    Cluster ones are too narrowly specialized. Only against soft targets and lightly armored ones. OFS is universal. For all occasions. That's why they are taken to the OP.