France calls on its citizens to leave Iran as soon as possible

French authorities urge their citizens currently in Iran to leave the country as soon as possible due to the risk of military escalation in the region.

A report published by the French Foreign Ministry notes that after Iran accused Israel of killing the leader of the Palestinian Hamas movement in Tehran, the risks of an armed conflict have increased significantly.

Meanwhile, the US and UK governments are sending additional refueling aircraft to the Middle East to support their fighter jets, which are expected to be used to intercept Iranian drones and missiles in the event of an attack on targets in Israel.

At the same time, American intelligence believes that Israel and its allies will not have enough time to repel an Iranian attack, as was the case in April of this year. The Pentagon expects a larger response to Israel from Iran and its proxies.

It was previously reported that US President Joe Biden and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu discussed the possibility of deploying additional American forces in the region to support the IDF if necessary. Biden also assured the Israeli prime minister of the United States' readiness to provide military assistance to the Jewish state to protect against possible threats from Iran and its allies.

Comments

[Mavrikiy]

French authorities urge their citizens currently in Iran to leave the country as soon as possible due to the risk of military escalation in the region.

Interesting. But they are not offering to leave Israeli territory....

[Huarabey]

And they somehow forgot to take this fact into account when they were making a scarecrow for Iran

[Myths]

They really want to shake up the hot spot there; they themselves don’t have enough strength to help Ukraine. It's a pity Iran is not Belarus.
Ours don’t want to help Iran with calibers and daggers. The hot heads of the warmongers would be cooled down.

[alystan]

And at this time, as the TG channel “The World through the Eyes of an Arabist” writes, paramilitary forces supported by Iran began moving from Iraq to the city of Abu Kemal in Syria.

Local sources in Syria are already reporting that Iran is massively transferring units of the Afghan Fatimiyoun forces and the Iraqi Kataib Sayyid al-Shuhada battalions from Iraq to the Imam Ali barracks in Abu Kemal.

[tralflot1832]

This is how you need to convince a Frenchman to go to Iran.

[Nexcom]

So the Spaniards called and said that now the shame is French...
Andrei

[opposite28]

Iranian French are not exactly the same as French French. You never know who among the Iranians is a potential bearer of the French soul (somewhere very deep inside themselves) such as those who carried out complicity and assistance in the death of Ismail Haniya, since in addition to technical support, there was no participation from those close to them, including from among ordinary service personnel especially.

[dmi.pris1]

How to get there? Money, business. In Iran, industry and the automotive industry have been developing very intensively in recent decades (by the way, on the basis of the French Peugeots). They started building a nuclear power plant, they have a lot going on there

[Michael]

Quote from: dmi.pris1

They started building a nuclear power plant, they have a lot involved there

That's right - business, contracts, children, wife, work? For example, the government will “strongly encourage” me to go somewhere, and I will immediately say that I have a job, I need to feed the children and pay the mortgage - where will I go from work, children and a mortgaged apartment?

[Victor Leningradets]

Apparently, Israel and the United States are preparing aggression against Iran.
One can only guess who else will join their union.
So the whole question is whether we can provide nuclear guarantees to Iran, or, as always, we will limit ourselves to the concerns of the Foreign Ministry.

[dmi.pris1]

Actually, Iran itself has nuclear potential. Already.. It is clear that it is very small, but still..

[Victor Leningradets]

Short chain mail!
This is if there is. Iran will not have enough strength for anything other than a retaliatory strike, which, even if it comes, will only aggravate the situation.
We are another matter. With air defense, aviation and tactical nuclear weapons on Iranian territory. Here the United States will have to turn on the back with the complete loss of all Arab allies and sympathizers.
And this is oil and the collapse of all geopolitical structures.
But isn't treason brewing within Iran itself?

[dmi.pris1]

But won’t we find ourselves in such a split that we won’t even be able to get up? Air defense and aviation are now desperately needed elsewhere. About tactical nuclear weapons... As I understand it, it has come to such a point that the enemy is no longer afraid of Russia’s nuclear potential. Or a sense of self-preservation lost, or knows something that we don’t know

[Beringovsky]

He's afraid, he's still afraid. Otherwise, we would have been bombed long ago, there is no need to doubt it.

[Victor Leningradets]

And you will fire a special warhead at an air target (dummy) over the Strait of Hormuz, so that it can be seen from tankers and destroyers. Then the attitude towards our nuclear potential will become much clearer. We promised to shoot down threatening targets? - they promised! So we put it into effect.

[Montezuma]

Quote: Victor Leningradets

So the whole question is whether we can provide nuclear guarantees to Iran, or, as always, we will limit ourselves to the concerns of the Foreign Ministry.

Are you now proposing that the Russian Federation directly get involved in a possible large-scale conflict in the BV, and even with “nuclear guarantees”? Seriously? Well, a very timely idea.

[Victor Leningradets]

Then, when the USA and NATO occupy the Caucasus, it will be very timely, but there will be nothing and no one with it.
It is important not to be late here. And the Americans are not such heroes as to fight to the death for distant lands.

[Montezuma]

Quote: Victor Leningradets

And the Americans are not such heroes as to fight to the death for distant lands.

In your opinion, it turns out that sending our guys “far away to fight to the death” means it’s possible. Interesting logic. And the fact that Russia is fighting against fifty NATO countries on the territory of the Ukrainian Reich does not count? We have an unlimited number of army and a lot of equipment, so that there is enough for two fronts at the same time? And the fact that NATO is increasing its presence in European countries and constantly conducting exercises with a clear anti-Russian focus should not be taken into account? Apparently, such “little things” do not play a role in your personal global strategy.

[Victor Leningradets]

The forces necessary to stop aggression against Iran are not involved in any way in the Northern Military District.
Moreover, this would be the most effective asymmetric response to the initiators of the NATO-Russia confrontation.
The internal situation in Iran is another matter. This is where the dog rummaged. If this score has already been laid out, including by internal US supporters in Iran, then it’s too late to rush around.

[Montezuma]

Quote: Victor Leningradets

The forces necessary to stop aggression against Iran are not involved in any way in the Northern Military District.

Yah? Why did the Russian Federation announce the start of the third stage of exercises of non-strategic nuclear forces on the morning of July 31? Is it really in order to demonstrate to the West the readiness to use them, if necessary, on the territory of the Ukrainian Reich, if the NATO members become insolent and begin the direct entry of their troops? So it will be more precise, not “not involved in any way,” but “are in full readiness for use, in accordance with the current situation.”

[Victor Leningradets]

Readiness for use and deployment are two different things. That's where they will be activated and ready for use. It's just empty. Partners won't allow it.

[Victor Leningradets]

It means it’s possible to send our guys far away to “fight to the death”

Of course, you need to fight there, and not die for the village of Kryukovo, as in 1941. A wait-and-see attitude will only lead to defeat. The enemy will impose his agenda where, when and how it is convenient for him.
It looks like, based on the minuses, many here are fluent in the “ostrich school”; if you’re scared, hide your head in the sand and don’t move, maybe it’ll blow you by!

[Prisoner]

Why? Do bedbugs suffer without food?

[alystan]

Then it would be appropriate for Iran to call on its citizens to urgently leave French territory.

[Evgen Zharov]

ZhaBidon and BenyaNeTanakuy discussed... It's time for the Jews to wander the deserts again for (at least) 40 years

[Rt Rt]

And let them drive straight to Israel

[Evgen Zharov]

Why don’t the toad-eaters withdraw the remnants of their “troops” from the previously occupied territories? WHAT ALL THE TIME the bugs invade there?

[Ripap]

I really hope that China has the brains to help the Iranians with supplies of various goodies. I assure them that they will not like a world in which Iran is defeated, they are next.

[Mathurin Nankap]

L'iran n'est pas seule, elle a consulté les différents acteurs de l'axe pour la réponse à Israël, us et ses vassaux ou pas. Ils ont les moyens de leur faire très mal au moyen-Orient de l'Afghanistan au liban en passant par le Yémen, l'irak et la Syrie. Les paris sont ouverts. Le moyen-Orient prendra-il feu? Si oui, qui s'en relèvera? L'avenir nous le dira mais Teheran est un gros morceau. Wait and see.

[alystan]

Ils ont les moyens de leur faire très mal au moyen-Orient de l'Afghanistan au liban en passant par le Yémen, l'irak et la Syrie. Les paris sont ouverts. Le moyen-Orient prendra-il feu?

prendra-t-il feu?
Time will truly tell who is capable of what.
But I think it will be difficult for Israel to survive if something serious breaks out.

[guest]

Iranian channels interrupted broadcasts and played the war anthem
https://eadaily.com/ru/news/2024/08/03/iranskie-kanaly-prervali-translyaciyu-i-zapustili-voennyy-gimn

[StopTheUSA]

At the same time, American intelligence believes that Israel and its allies will not have enough time to repel an Iranian attack, as was the case in April of this year. The Pentagon expects a larger response to Israel from Iran and its proxies

.
Let's hope that the Americans, in their typical manner, are not exaggerating or exaggerating