Former Iraqi Defense Minister on contracts with Russia

19
Iraqi network resources report that former Iraqi Defense Minister Lieutenant General Abdul Qadir Mohammed Jassim Obeid Al-Mifarji (Abdul Qadir Mohammed Jassim Obeidi al-Mifarji), who held this post in the government of Nuri Al-Maliki from June 2006 to December 2010, 19 February 2013 interviewed Iraqi television, including the recent Iraqi contracts for the purchase of Russian weapons (a statement of the interview in Arabic is, for example, here). As can be judged, Kadir Obeidi was at the forefront of negotiations on the purchase of a large batch of Russian weapons for the new armed forces of Iraq.

Former Iraqi Defense Minister on contracts with Russia

The current Minister of Defense of Iraq, Saadoun al-Dilami (Saadoun al-Dulaimi, has been in office since August 2011) with the model of the combat vehicle of the Russian Panzir-S1 anti-aircraft missile system

On the issue of military-technical cooperation with Russia, former Iraqi Defense Minister Kadir Obeidi said the following:

Weapons contracts with Russia are part of the second phase of the Iraqi three-stage weapons program, designed until 2020 and assuming Iraq to achieve “full defense capability”.

Iraq made a comparative evaluation of the Boeing AH-64D, Eurocopter Tiger and Mi-28 combat helicopters, and as a result chose the Mi-28 [Mi-28NE] as an army combat helicopter aviation.

Iraq will not purchase any Tanks “of eastern origin”, as they are, in the words of the former Iraqi Minister of Defense, “track bombs”. In the future, only Western-made tanks will be purchased (the possibility of obtaining additional M1A1 Abrams tanks from the presence of the American army under the EDA program is being considered).

Kadir Obeidi said that "the armament program of Iraq will continue, and politicians who are trying to foil a deal with Russia will not succeed."

Kadir Obeidi also said that Iraq had turned to Russia with a request for the urgent acquisition of fighters, and that the parties had agreed to make an emergency delivery to Iraq of eight ready-made fighters in June 2013 of the year. According to Iraqi observers, it may be that Iraq is acquiring eight MiG-29M fighters from a frozen Syrian order.

According to the statement of the former minister, in negotiations with Russia on the issue of arms procurement, the Iraqi side put forward seven main points of the equipment list, in the acquisition of which it was interested. These are the Pantsir-C1 and Tor-M2E air defense complexes, infantry fighting vehicles BMP-3, Su-30МК2 and MiG-29М / М2 fighters, Mi-17В-5 and Мi-28Е helicopters. The first package of contracts was concluded in the amount of 4,5 billion dollars.

Kadir Obeidi also noted that "due to political uproar and unnecessary cries in the Iraqi parliament, which almost discredited the deal [with Russia], in the future military contracts will not be publicly announced by the government to avoid delays and difficulties in international relations ".
19 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +2
    25 February 2013 17: 25
    Is it possible that the owners from Washington will let this deal go through. Something is not clean here. Well, they don’t need our technologies. here kakraz is the case when it is better to overtake than not to finish.
    1. 101
      101
      +1
      25 February 2013 18: 26
      Quote: Renat
      Is it possible that the owners from Washington will let this deal go through.
      It’s almost openly said that the owners will not tolerate and will not forget about the role of the United States in their history.
    2. ded
      +1
      25 February 2013 18: 58
      According to Iraqi observers, perhaps this is about Iraq acquiring eight MiG-29M fighters from a frozen Syrian order.


      There probably agreed with the Americans (either we (Russia) supply the previously ordered planes of Syria, or you buy. But we do not intend to lose money.)

      Iraq will not buy any tanks of "eastern origin" as they are, in the words of the former Iraqi defense minister, "bombs on tracks."


      This, in my opinion, is the answer to the question: Why did they start to create "Atmata"?

      Iraq made a comparative assessment of the Boeing AH-64D, Eurocopter Tiger and Mi-28 combat helicopters and, as a result, chose the Mi-28 [Mi-28EE] as a military helicopter for the military.


      And here, if this is true, then you can really be proud!
  2. +3
    25 February 2013 17: 52
    We’ll wait and see how all these contracts end. It’s hard to judge yet.
  3. 0
    25 February 2013 17: 55
    You never know where you will find where you will lose. A good gift at the beginning of the year.
  4. 0
    25 February 2013 17: 56
    We have advanced aviation.
    That armored vehicles still pull up ...
  5. +5
    25 February 2013 18: 08
    Quote: Renat
    Is it possible that the owners from Washington will let this deal go through. Something is not clean here. Well, they don’t need our technologies. here kakraz is the case when it is better to overtake than not to finish.


    why do you have such suspicion, what do you think if the Iraqi government came to power that they are in solidarity with the United States ?! I think the Iraqi government is pursuing a different policy from the US government. They are pursuing their own national interests. Iraq is not Saudi Arabia and especially not Qatar.
    1. Fox
      +1
      25 February 2013 18: 39
      Quote: Apollon
      why are you so suspicious

      Duc, it is not the first time that Iraqis have acquired our equipment for studying mattresses. And it’s just something that mattresses are afraid of not wanting to face in military operations.
    2. +3
      25 February 2013 18: 59
      Quote: Apollon
      What do you think if the Iraqi government came to power that they are in solidarity with the United States ?!

      And what about the cancellation of Iraq’s debt to Russia with the condition that Iraq acquires half of the military equipment?
  6. +3
    25 February 2013 18: 46
    We will not buy "bombs on caterpillars" ... but we will buy armored buses
  7. +2
    25 February 2013 18: 47
    Quote: Fox
    Duc, it is not the first time that Iraqis have acquired our equipment for studying mattresses. And it’s just something that mattresses are afraid of not wanting to face in military operations.


    Arabs, although one nation, are different in nature. I tell you this in spirit. Iraqis are a proud people, although they consider liberation from Saddam as a blessing. nevertheless. they will never accept the occupation of Iraq. De jure Iraq is independent. It is de facto under occupation.

    post script
    Iraqi vice president fled to Turkey, the question is why, the second Americans support the Kurds in the north of Iraq as a whole and encourage autonomy, but actually push independence, the question is why, I tell you so, the situation in Iraq is not uniform in itself.
  8. 0
    25 February 2013 18: 49
    Not bad, not bad.
  9. +2
    25 February 2013 18: 56
    The former minister gave an interview .... Without reference to the documents ..... Perhaps a fling of information was specially made to monitor the reaction of all interested parties. And then make a decision. East is a delicate matter. Must see ...
  10. +2
    25 February 2013 19: 26
    [b] In the future, only Western-made tanks will be purchased (the possibility of obtaining additional M1A1 Abrams tanks is being considered

    A clever man. I heard that there would be no problems with spare parts. The desert is full of disassembling abrams.
  11. 0
    25 February 2013 19: 34
    It is not at all clear why for this contract?
    After all, there are no guarantees at all that these weapons will not move to America to study! To develop counteractions to these models
    1. s1н7т
      +1
      25 February 2013 22: 03
      Quote: APASUS
      ! to develop opposition to these models

      Usually, such a modification is sold that its study does not give anything to our best enemies.
  12. DeerIvanovich
    +1
    25 February 2013 20: 44
    Iraq was left at the mercy of Iran, whoever arms outdated samples there is not important. The main thing is to arm! And at the same time, if the opportunity arises, you can discredit ... but then ... when the time comes!
    Still, there are some agreements on BV between Russia and the United States, it’s another thing that both of them try to outwit each other, and they officially smile on friendly terms!

    such a scenario: Sunnis with Shiites = war, in the end, Iran wins ?! not the Saudis, not the Bahrains are not like the role of the 5th Reich, reach only the scale of local wars, and terrorist networks, Iran is another thing, which has already crushed Iraq. (Germany is returning its original lands to Austria, exactly the same analogy with the Shiites of Iraq)
    As you can see, the Iranian Reich is being built according to the same patterns as the 3rd Reich was built!
    Shiites came to power with the support of the Americans, like the Natsik 3 Reich.

    No matter how absurd the scenario was, but alas, it should be so according to the plans of backstage strategists. It is interesting against whom the Islamist East will be directed ?! request smile
    1. s1н7т
      0
      25 February 2013 22: 31
      Quote: DeerIvanovich
      It is interesting against whom the Islamist East will be directed ?!

      Religious states have no prospects. First they will attack the neighbors, then they will snap at the "creators", and then they will eat themselves.
  13. Octavian avgust
    +2
    25 February 2013 21: 13
    Kadir Obeidi also noted that "due to political uproar and unnecessary cries in the Iraqi parliament, which almost discredited the deal [with Russia], in the future military contracts will not be publicly announced by the government to avoid delays and difficulties in international relations ".
    The Yankees press on what else to do when they see a competitor go 4,5 billion. green + the country seems to be occupied. It was not for this that they carried "freedom" and removed Saddam Hussein.
    And the truth beats the vanity of hypocritical garbage!
  14. INVOU
    +2
    25 February 2013 22: 01
    Third-party provocation in order to monitor our developments. IMHO
  15. 0
    25 February 2013 22: 12
    We look what will happen next. Sincerely.
  16. 0
    25 February 2013 22: 50
    Then these fucking Iraqis will give weapons to the Americans, and they will work out a breakthrough in air defense, the fight against fighters ...
  17. +1
    26 February 2013 00: 26
    Somehow I like selling equipment for long-term loans to unreliable regions ..... because then quite often it ends with forgiving old debts at the expense of future transactions, I'm certainly not an economist but .........