"Criminal failures" of Colonel Kvachkov
Perhaps over the past few years there has not been a more resonant court in Russia in relation to a former or current soldier than the court that was held over a retired GRU colonel Vladimir Kvachkov. After the conviction of the Moscow City Court, according to which Colonel Kvachkov was accused of promoting terrorism and organizing an armed insurrection, the public buzzed. Buzzed for several reasons.
Firstly, the trial itself was held in a half-closed mode, and the press subsequently managed to learn all the details of the course of this trial from the lips of lawyers. Journalists were admitted to the meeting already when the court heard the arguments of the parties and proceeded to the conviction, according to which Kvachkov received 13 years of "stricter".
Secondly, the evidence base of the corpus delicti is somewhat strange, which is based on the testimony of those people who, even at the trial itself, stated that these same testimonies were beaten out of them by the investigators in completely unlawful ways. The court did not investigate how the testimony was beaten out, in effect declaring that the witnesses this time bear false witness. That is, getting several witnesses at once to places that actively contribute to giving any testimony didn’t cause questions to the court, but why the witnesses decided to state testimony methods at the court itself - you know, it caused ... Like, gentlemen, if you think that you were not questioned within the framework of the law, then be so kind as to sue ... Oh, we later (after the verdict in the current case) and we'll figure it out ...
Thirdly, the application of the article of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation, on which Kvachkov was accused, raises questions. After all, if the court by the term “armed rebellion” understands the presence of a group of retired officers of a very young age, one broken crossbow, several hunting knives, two air pistols and a machine gun with a scattering of ammunition, which weapons and do not fit at all, then, frankly, it becomes scary for the security of the Russian Federation as a state.
Arguments of the court that, they say, Kvachkov - an experienced officer, and therefore could easily make an unconstitutional coup alone in the presence of two pneumatic trunks and a hunting knife, look, at least, strange. If you are guided by the logic of Judge Melekhin, then an article about an armed rebellion can get any pretty drunk fishing or hunting man who claims that he is not in awe of the policies of the current authorities. Why? The entire evidence base will be quite similar: is there a gun? - there are a couple of drunken friends? - also, well, the words that he would have ruled the country “a thousand times better”, every second Russian citizen speaks in our kitchens, in smoking rooms (and not only) ...
However, “every second man” is not imprisoned, as well as those whose evidence base against which is much more impressive and repeatedly confirmed, is not imprisoned, but the retired colonel Kvachkov is planted. As they say, far and long ...
Recently it became known that the lawyers of Vladimir Kvachkov are going to appeal the Moscow City Court’s verdict in the Supreme Court of Russia. It was the Supreme Court that at the time passed the final acquittal of the retired GRU officer in the so-called “Chubais case”. Recall that in the 2005 year, the FSB took Kvachkov into a turn, suspecting that it was precisely at the order of Kvachkov that an ambush was made on the route of the car of Anatoly Chubais. In that attempt, the "father of privatization" was not injured. Moreover, Anatoly Borisovich stated then that he already knew about the assassination attempt on him, and therefore the ambush did not come as a surprise to him. These words made the jury doubt whether there was an attempt at all, or there was a rather mediocre direction instead.
In the end, after long trials, the Kvachkov court not only acquitted, but also ordered the Ministry of Finance to pay him monetary compensation in the amount of 450 thousand rubles.
If you dock the events of March 2005 of the year, the acquittal of the Moscow Regional Court, confirmed by the decision of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation, with the conviction Vladimir Kvachkov “awarded” in February of this year, the retired officer, holder of the two Orders of Courage and the Order of the Red Star, simply excuse me hopeless layman. “I wanted to kill Chubais — it didn't work out, I“ wanted ”to recruit people to go to Moscow with hunting knives — again it didn't work ... One gets the impression that someone intends to expose a military officer, he tried his best to attract attention to himself, but thanks to the vigorous work of the representatives of the special services, this “terrorist” and “rebel” failed. They say, citizens of Russia, sleep peacefully - we will always find justice for such “criminals” as Colonel Kvachkov: we will withdraw knives, leaflets and pneumatic pukalki ...
But the citizens of Russia “rebel” Kvachkov together with his whole “army” were somehow not particularly afraid. More precisely, they were not even afraid at all ... Our citizens today are not at all concerned with broken crossbows, with which someone there tried to push towards Moscow, and not even the health and life of Anatoly Borisovich Chubais, but something completely different. Concerns, for example, why with much less enthusiasm cases are investigated and handed down (more correctly, rather, they say: they are not handed down) convictions against terry corrupt officials, in whose houses you can find much more impressive collections than the collection of a pair of Colonel Kvachkov's pistols . The public is worried about why roof guards of the underground business, representatives of the Ministry of Internal Affairs, the prosecutor’s office, the judiciary, who kill women and children to death on the pavements and stops; why in criminal cases of billions of dollars of embezzlement from the state budget, investigators have to figure it out for years, calling on dozens of different witnesses (many of whom themselves could have put their hands on tight bundles of bills), but in such a large-scale case as “state insurgency” charges are taken out as soon as pancakes are baked in a hot pan ...
Based on the above logic, it turns out that in our country the colonel of the Main Intelligence Directorate was preparing for committing all his “crimes” so clumsily that even the ladies from Oboronservis outnumbered him in preparation. How else? Kvachkov, according to the investigators and the court, at all intersections trumpeted that he was preparing a "crime", but the "women's council" at the Ministry of Defense quietly did its work. As a result, Kvachkov is a “trinashka on the zone,” and, for example, Ms. Vasilyeva is a trinashka in the number of dungeon rooms, where she waits until the investigators finally collect an “exhaustive” evidence base. Here is how! .. Behind this: urgent! urgent! urgent! all officers of the GRU - to go through the "school of silence" "Oboronservisa" ...
Firstly, the trial itself was held in a half-closed mode, and the press subsequently managed to learn all the details of the course of this trial from the lips of lawyers. Journalists were admitted to the meeting already when the court heard the arguments of the parties and proceeded to the conviction, according to which Kvachkov received 13 years of "stricter".
Secondly, the evidence base of the corpus delicti is somewhat strange, which is based on the testimony of those people who, even at the trial itself, stated that these same testimonies were beaten out of them by the investigators in completely unlawful ways. The court did not investigate how the testimony was beaten out, in effect declaring that the witnesses this time bear false witness. That is, getting several witnesses at once to places that actively contribute to giving any testimony didn’t cause questions to the court, but why the witnesses decided to state testimony methods at the court itself - you know, it caused ... Like, gentlemen, if you think that you were not questioned within the framework of the law, then be so kind as to sue ... Oh, we later (after the verdict in the current case) and we'll figure it out ...
Thirdly, the application of the article of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation, on which Kvachkov was accused, raises questions. After all, if the court by the term “armed rebellion” understands the presence of a group of retired officers of a very young age, one broken crossbow, several hunting knives, two air pistols and a machine gun with a scattering of ammunition, which weapons and do not fit at all, then, frankly, it becomes scary for the security of the Russian Federation as a state.
Arguments of the court that, they say, Kvachkov - an experienced officer, and therefore could easily make an unconstitutional coup alone in the presence of two pneumatic trunks and a hunting knife, look, at least, strange. If you are guided by the logic of Judge Melekhin, then an article about an armed rebellion can get any pretty drunk fishing or hunting man who claims that he is not in awe of the policies of the current authorities. Why? The entire evidence base will be quite similar: is there a gun? - there are a couple of drunken friends? - also, well, the words that he would have ruled the country “a thousand times better”, every second Russian citizen speaks in our kitchens, in smoking rooms (and not only) ...
However, “every second man” is not imprisoned, as well as those whose evidence base against which is much more impressive and repeatedly confirmed, is not imprisoned, but the retired colonel Kvachkov is planted. As they say, far and long ...
Recently it became known that the lawyers of Vladimir Kvachkov are going to appeal the Moscow City Court’s verdict in the Supreme Court of Russia. It was the Supreme Court that at the time passed the final acquittal of the retired GRU officer in the so-called “Chubais case”. Recall that in the 2005 year, the FSB took Kvachkov into a turn, suspecting that it was precisely at the order of Kvachkov that an ambush was made on the route of the car of Anatoly Chubais. In that attempt, the "father of privatization" was not injured. Moreover, Anatoly Borisovich stated then that he already knew about the assassination attempt on him, and therefore the ambush did not come as a surprise to him. These words made the jury doubt whether there was an attempt at all, or there was a rather mediocre direction instead.
In the end, after long trials, the Kvachkov court not only acquitted, but also ordered the Ministry of Finance to pay him monetary compensation in the amount of 450 thousand rubles.
If you dock the events of March 2005 of the year, the acquittal of the Moscow Regional Court, confirmed by the decision of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation, with the conviction Vladimir Kvachkov “awarded” in February of this year, the retired officer, holder of the two Orders of Courage and the Order of the Red Star, simply excuse me hopeless layman. “I wanted to kill Chubais — it didn't work out, I“ wanted ”to recruit people to go to Moscow with hunting knives — again it didn't work ... One gets the impression that someone intends to expose a military officer, he tried his best to attract attention to himself, but thanks to the vigorous work of the representatives of the special services, this “terrorist” and “rebel” failed. They say, citizens of Russia, sleep peacefully - we will always find justice for such “criminals” as Colonel Kvachkov: we will withdraw knives, leaflets and pneumatic pukalki ...
But the citizens of Russia “rebel” Kvachkov together with his whole “army” were somehow not particularly afraid. More precisely, they were not even afraid at all ... Our citizens today are not at all concerned with broken crossbows, with which someone there tried to push towards Moscow, and not even the health and life of Anatoly Borisovich Chubais, but something completely different. Concerns, for example, why with much less enthusiasm cases are investigated and handed down (more correctly, rather, they say: they are not handed down) convictions against terry corrupt officials, in whose houses you can find much more impressive collections than the collection of a pair of Colonel Kvachkov's pistols . The public is worried about why roof guards of the underground business, representatives of the Ministry of Internal Affairs, the prosecutor’s office, the judiciary, who kill women and children to death on the pavements and stops; why in criminal cases of billions of dollars of embezzlement from the state budget, investigators have to figure it out for years, calling on dozens of different witnesses (many of whom themselves could have put their hands on tight bundles of bills), but in such a large-scale case as “state insurgency” charges are taken out as soon as pancakes are baked in a hot pan ...
Based on the above logic, it turns out that in our country the colonel of the Main Intelligence Directorate was preparing for committing all his “crimes” so clumsily that even the ladies from Oboronservis outnumbered him in preparation. How else? Kvachkov, according to the investigators and the court, at all intersections trumpeted that he was preparing a "crime", but the "women's council" at the Ministry of Defense quietly did its work. As a result, Kvachkov is a “trinashka on the zone,” and, for example, Ms. Vasilyeva is a trinashka in the number of dungeon rooms, where she waits until the investigators finally collect an “exhaustive” evidence base. Here is how! .. Behind this: urgent! urgent! urgent! all officers of the GRU - to go through the "school of silence" "Oboronservisa" ...
Information