Rostec State Corporation: there is no effective protection against attacks from the Iskander OTRK

20 910 25
Rostec State Corporation: there is no effective protection against attacks from the Iskander OTRK

Representatives of the Russian state corporation Rostec, commenting on the publication in the American publication Military Watch Magazine, emphasized that there are currently no effective means of protection against strikes missiles operational-tactical complex "Iskander".

The Rostec State Corporation noted that the most powerful warhead of the Iskander missiles during the military operation of the Russian Armed Forces in Ukraine demonstrated the ability to extremely accurately hit the intended targets.



The Telegram channel of the Russian state corporation also indicates that the missile systems produced by the High-Precision Complexes holding are actively used in the SVO zone. The warhead of the Iskander-M missile is capable of destroying buildings, warships or enemy fortifications. At the same time, Iskander missiles demonstrate sniper accuracy, deviating from the target by a few meters, which has absolutely no significance, given the radius of destruction of the warhead.

Earlier, Military Watch Magazine published an article noting that the missiles of the Russian Iskander-M operational-tactical missile systems are capable of maneuvering in flight, moving at extremely low altitudes, which makes it difficult for them to be detected by means of Defense the adversary.

The Russian military is assisted in carrying out objective control over the results of fire damage by the Supercam UAVs manufactured by Rostec State Corporation, which are protected from EW and capable of reaching speeds of up to 120 km/h.
25 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +6
    16 July 2024 11: 52
    This has been proven in the NWO zone. good
    1. 0
      16 July 2024 13: 32
      Rostec State Corporation: there is no effective protection against attacks from the Iskander OTRK

      laughing !.. Keep it up!.. Shoot down the freaks!.. Let there always be Sun!..
      For example, thermonuclear, closer to Poland!.. Or - directly to the US coast, ... so as not to later collect radioactive ash in piles on your continent, since there will be no one else.
    2. 0
      16 July 2024 14: 29
      proven in the NWO zone.

      What has been proven? That a high explosive or a cluster warhead consisting of 500 small 54 kg shells can be dropped with a precision of 480 km with a CEP of 150 m? That's a plus. As well as the fact that air defense can be penetrated with a high probability. But the price of this pleasure? Not even the price, but the production capacity? The Americans are meticulous, they counted the number of all launches and estimated the capabilities of the Russian Federation at six!!! missiles per month. And only 50 PU. This is barely enough to roll out a regional center. And that's unlikely, if you compare it with the number of lighters and high explosives on Dresden. The main thing in the Iskander is the 6 kilotons of nuclear warhead, which is guaranteed to fly. 8 x 48 = 250 is the number of FAB-300, which were dropped on a small village 8 meters long along a river by two flights of Mi-XNUMX MT.
      1. +2
        16 July 2024 14: 59
        What are you carrying? (Short comment)
        1. 0
          16 July 2024 15: 09
          What are you carrying?

          Do you have problems understanding Russian? It seems to be clearly written - "Iskander" with a conventional warhead is not a good weapon in a large-scale war because of its high cost. To scare a weak country - yes, it can. To change the situation in the same Ukraine - no. The maximum - to solve individual, extremely rare tactical tasks.
          1. 0
            16 July 2024 15: 30
            I have no difficulties. I don’t understand your interpretations and speculations. What is your crying all about? What do you mean? There is nowhere to throw out anger, so I’m not a psychiatrist. The Americans did the math, Dauria brought it to the masses. The circus has left, colleague.
            1. 0
              16 July 2024 15: 47
              I have no difficulties

              So, there are other readers here besides you. Those who know how to not "mumble", but calmly and soberly assess reality. If you have any objections to what is written, post them. From February to the end of May 2022, more than 240 missile strikes were recorded. After - rare isolated cases. 240 high-explosive shells weighing 500 kg each - a pellet for an elephant even on the scale of a normally dispersed MSD. Not to mention that they were spread out over two months.
              1. -1
                16 July 2024 16: 01
                Colleague, I don’t even want to comprehend your letters. One question, what did you want from OTRK? What characteristics did you want to put there? What are you offering? An alternative to Iskander? What are you talking about?
                1. 0
                  16 July 2024 16: 12
                  Iskander was initially created as a means of delivering a tactical nuclear charge in conditions of strong enemy air defense. Moreover, to tactical depth in the interests of infantry in defense and attack. That's all. All these high-explosive shells and cassettes are an add-on that is of no use. 500 kg will destroy one entrance of a five-story Khrushchev-era building, no more. Now they have thrown it out, tested it - they will take it into account, improve it and end this fooling around. Moreover, they are not testing the missile itself, but the entire complex of machines in real conditions. Even the one in which they wash foot wraps and cook food.
                  1. 0
                    16 July 2024 16: 15
                    Colleague, don't joke with nuclear weapons. We will win anyway. Cool down, I have no desire to quarrel with someone out of the blue. hi
                    1. -1
                      16 July 2024 16: 17
                      don't joke with nuclear

                      Am I calling? You have to be a complete idiot to be the first to use nuclear weapons in Ukraine. And you have to be an even bigger idiot if you don’t have tactical nuclear weapons against NATO.
                      1. +3
                        16 July 2024 17: 25
                        Alex.
                        The main targets of the Iskanders at the moment are MLRS, air defense facilities, objects at airfields, and plus all sorts of things like “vital infrastructure”.
                        What the Iskanders do very well.
                        Their tasks have never included “rolling out regional centers.” Unless it's nuclear.
                        And they cope quite well with the turnover.
                        Yes, I would probably like them to fly like clouds, blocking out the sun.
                        But don’t forget that our country, in principle, lives in a relatively peaceful regime. Salaries are paid, pensions are paid.
                        And then there is a choice: either clouds of Iskanders or salary and pensions.
                        And, by the way, meticulous Americans, to put it mildly, are mistaken in the number of Iskanders produced. Otherwise they wouldn’t have been shot so much.
          2. +1
            16 July 2024 15: 44
            What is Iskander used for? In your opinion, in order to hit the trenches on the front line?
          3. +1
            16 July 2024 16: 11
            The fact is that there are no other options.
      2. 0
        16 July 2024 17: 16
        six !!! rockets per month
        and they let them in at a rate of one or two a week? Or is it old stock that will run out in a week?
  2. +1
    16 July 2024 12: 17
    Judging by the statements, they then need to be produced as cartridges for Kalashnikov.
    1. +4
      16 July 2024 12: 32
      Yes, they seem to have been put on stream - this can be seen by how frequent the displays of videos using it have become good They don’t regret it and even use it with cassette parts. The advantage is that it is unrealistic to intercept and the approach time is very short, that 404 simply cannot do anything
      1. 0
        16 July 2024 13: 22
        Looks like they've been put on stream
        The flow is determined by the type of production - single, serial, large-scale, mass. Solid propellant rocket motors have always been manufactured in batches and, depending on the number of sets of equipment in production, the number of solid propellant rocket motors in the batch is determined. It is not possible to compare the production of solid propellant rocket engines with the production of cartridges.
        1. 0
          16 July 2024 13: 25
          It is clear that in the TT engine the requirements are different... any cavity and everything... but fortunately there are no problems with troubleshooting, after all, not a launch vehicle stage, but more modest in size
          1. 0
            16 July 2024 14: 43
            There is no difference in the requirements for TT homogeneity, whether for a single-stage rocket or for a multi-stage one.
  3. +1
    16 July 2024 12: 35
    Reconnaissance and target designation are what guarantee a successful Iskander strike. With the complex itself, thank God, everything is set up, it works like a clock!
  4. -6
    16 July 2024 13: 56
    There are different opinions about Iskander, including detailed comparative analyses with other systems. The analyses are made by Western publications. "Enemy Voices" have the audacity lol assert that the Iskander complex is inferior to the leading models not only of the Western military-industrial complex, but also of Iranian missiles fellow . (they compare the KVO, throw weight, presence/absence of multi-block, etc.). There is also information that the Iskanders have electronic components produced in the "decaying" West.
    I would like to see an information plate from the manufacturer to understand that this “product” has no analogues.
    1. +1
      16 July 2024 14: 48
      There are different opinions about Iskander
      An opinion can be expressed on the basis of knowledge, but “Western publications” have no knowledge on the design of the Iskander missile.
    2. 0
      16 July 2024 17: 18
      Well, there was an opinion in the comments that nothing reaches Kyiv because everything is shot down. And when it arrived, the person expressing such versions disappeared somewhere
  5. +2
    16 July 2024 14: 06
    "Supercam UAVs produced by Rostec Group"
    The Unmanned Systems group of companies has been a developer and manufacturer of Supercam brand unmanned aerial systems since 2010.
    To date, the Unmanned Systems Group of Companies has supplied more than 1500 Supercam unmanned aerial systems to various public and private organizations.
    GC "Unmanned Systems" continues to participate in the international defense and security exhibition "World Defense Show-2024" at the joint stand of the Russian exposition in Riyadh.
    On the first day, the exhibition was presented to the Deputy Chairman of the Government of the Russian Federation - Minister of Industry and Trade of the Russian Federation Denis Valentinovich Manturov and the General Director of the State Corporation Rostec Sergey Viktorovich Chemezov.
  6. The comment was deleted.