Deliveries and losses: the British press counted the tanks transferred to the Ukrainian Armed Forces

59
Deliveries and losses: the British press counted the tanks transferred to the Ukrainian Armed Forces

The West has launched massive deliveries since the beginning of 2023 tanks to the Armed Forces of Ukraine. All cars that came to hand were and will continue to be used: from Soviet models to modern Western models.

NATO and other allies of Ukraine have provided, promised or are executing an order for 819 tanks. Of this number, 682 units have already been transferred to the Ukrainian Armed Forces. These range from the older 105mm variants of the Leopard 1 and T-72 to the modern Challenger 2 and the relatively new M1A1 Abrams

- says the British edition of Army Technology.



As indicated with reference to Ukrainian “analysts”, the losses of the Ukrainian Armed Forces allegedly amounted to at least 143 MBTs: 95 T-72, 8 PT-91, 10 M1A1 Abrams, 1 Challenger 2 and at least 30 Leopard 2. Obviously, only the equipment caught on camera lenses, and even then not all of it.

According to a British intelligence report published in late January 2024, after the deployment of the offensive operation of the Russian Armed Forces, Russian troops since the beginning of October 2023, they could lose up to 365 tanks, that is, less than a hundred units per month. At the same time, according to British military intelligence, Moscow is capable of producing or repairing at least a hundred tanks per month.

This is an acceptable loss level. Russian industry is able to compensate for them by returning damaged platforms to service, producing new tanks, or reactivating reserve reserves.

- noted in the press.

59 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +8
    13 July 2024 22: 28
    It's good that we filled them, all the vaunted superiority disappeared instantly
    1. +3
      14 July 2024 05: 32
      Urgently
      There has been an assassination attempt on Trump.
      They missed. The bullet passed tangentially and hit my ear.

      Democracy....
      1. +2
        14 July 2024 05: 44
        Supplement:
        9 shots, those standing nearby were killed. The shooter was shot dead by security. He shot from 125 meters from the roof opposite the stands.
      2. +2
        14 July 2024 10: 59
        They didn’t really miss - they hit one of his ears (he only has 2 of them)! Now let's give Trump a nickname - "Donald - Shot in the Ear."
  2. -6
    13 July 2024 22: 29
    How many tanks did Russia lose during the Northern Military District? and what is the ratio to the enemy?
    1. -3
      13 July 2024 22: 49
      Well, in addition to tanks, the Russian Federation lost many vehicles in supply columns. And these are not only cars but also people. Why did they go unaccompanied? How many planes were lost? There were no bulldozers to fill the caponiers? How many ammunition depots were damaged? Is this also a problem with bulldozers? If you investigate the history of the SVO, you will have many questions about the organization of everything. It's like 41 here. Why weren't we ready? Moles? Incompetence? Corruption? What?
      1. +8
        13 July 2024 23: 14
        How quickly, in one message, you moved from the loss of tanks supplied to Ukraine to the topic of bulldozers and caponiers in the Russian Army.
        1. +1
          14 July 2024 03: 29
          The manual obliges, so to speak))
          1. +2
            14 July 2024 03: 51
            Yes, they already manage without a manual. they just carry all sorts of blizzards. One diagram for any message...
            This is all nonsense, in fact everything disappeared... and off we go. You respect such people and you can try on white slippers, anyway, if not today, then tomorrow we will all be finished.
            1. 0
              14 July 2024 07: 36
              Judging by the fact that everything is heading towards a “vigorous loaf”, very many. And not because someone there didn’t have enough bulldozers. In general, the SVO highlighted a lot of problems. As always, Russia is not ready for war, although it seemed that the opposite was true. Well, “it’s not the gods who burn the pots,” let’s straighten it out and win. As it always was.
        2. +5
          14 July 2024 03: 40
          From the Ministry of Defense report for July 13, 2024
          In total, since the beginning of the special military operation, the following have been destroyed: 627 aircraft, 277 helicopters, 27553 unmanned aerial vehicles, 547 anti-aircraft missile systems, 16567 tanks and other armored combat vehicles, 1376 combat vehicles of multiple launch rocket systems, 11834 field artillery guns and mortars, 23637 units special military vehicles, the defense department said in a statement.
          Since when did we begin to trust the British press and not trust the reports of the Ministry of Defense...???
          1. 0
            14 July 2024 03: 52
            I didn't understand something. Why did you write this to me?
            1. +1
              14 July 2024 04: 09
              You respect such people and you can try on white slippers, anyway, if not today, then tomorrow we will all be finished.

              So that “not to measure white slippers” and then this is the data of our Ministry of Defense not only for you, but also for everyone who believes that “if not today, then tomorrow it’s the end of all of us”... I fully understand that you personally do not think so... In general, if something is wrong, sorry!!! hi
              1. +2
                14 July 2024 04: 17
                Quote: Lev_Russia
                for everyone who believes that “if not today, tomorrow is the end for all of us”

                Ew, it’s clear smile
                Reading their nonsense, you get the feeling that they don’t think so either, it’s just an outright sketch of TsIPSOsh nonsense. In 2022, there weren’t so many messages that “everything was lost,” they were quite happy and rubbed their sweaty little hands. But over time, the sadness overcame them, they still pour out their sadness, they shouldn’t go to war. Even if it was in his own pants, he made a mess of the damned Muscovites.
          2. 0
            14 July 2024 06: 51
            I understand your sarcasm but still...
            These numbers indicate targets attacked and signs of defeat. For example, an aircraft signature disappeared after a missile was launched, a gun position was hit by a lancet or “suitcase” of a six-inch howitzer, and the like. Ideally, observe a detonation or fire, but alas, not every time request
          3. +1
            17 July 2024 15: 34
            Have you ever learned in the reports of our Defense Ministry about the losses of our fleet or our losses - reading our reports there is no understanding at all of the potential and balance of forces...
            These reports with typical phrases (such as “all targets hit”) resemble a broken record.

            Our reports are one-sided and do not allow us to understand the real situation at the front at a particular moment.
            Remember the Ministry of Defense reports in September 2022, when we left the Kharkov region? There was also a daily listing of lost units of equipment and destroyed enemy fighters - only this listing was of any use if at the same time the Ukrainians were taking dozens of settlements practically without a fight... therefore, there is no faith in such reports - there were too many lies...
        3. +1
          14 July 2024 04: 28
          Their losses are not our problem. Why feel sorry for the adversary? But controlling your losses is a bloody nose... This is not good at all. Most of them are the result of incompetence and sloppiness of the command.
          And even worse - it's all covered. Did the attack fail? - so we carried out reconnaissance in force, the task was completed. All this can be listed, but it is suppressed at all levels. Quite rude and vile methods.
          1. 0
            14 July 2024 04: 38
            Quote: Prokop_Svinin
            Their losses are not our problem.

            This is precisely an indicator of the work of our troops. How does he propose to evaluate the effectiveness of air strikes, shooting, and the work of sappers?
            There is a subject of the article, there is something to discuss. But some people can’t stand it; from any topic about the enemy’s losses, some from the first message, even without transition, write how bad everything is with us. So the flies are separate, the cutlets are separate.
            1. -5
              14 July 2024 05: 03
              What they have there is from retellings. And what we have - everyone can see by visiting the cemetery. It should be clear to everyone that skillful and responsible conduct of air defense cannot allow such losses. The enemy's level is not at all the level to stupidly butt heads with.
              1. +2
                14 July 2024 05: 09
                Quote: Prokop_Svinin
                What they have there is from retellings.

                Shooting and strikes are not corrected from retellings. You also need to know the number of the enemy and they will find out without visiting the cemeteries of Ukraine. This article is precisely about this, that even other countries assess the losses of equipment, qualitative and quantitative, to understand the situation on the LBS, but for some reason you are drawn to transfer to the topic of how bad everything is with us.
                1. -2
                  14 July 2024 05: 12
                  I have already said that what is bad with us should be a priority. Otherwise, jumping on the spot and shouting will absolutely end in some kind of Minsk and Istanbul.
                  1. +1
                    14 July 2024 05: 28
                    Quote: Prokop_Svinin
                    I have already said that what is bad with us should be a priority.

                    For whom for us? And why should this be the priority, and not the desire for an objective picture?
                    Quote: Prokop_Svinin
                    jumping on the spot and shouting will absolutely end in some kind of Minsk and Istanbul.

                    Alarmists and all-goers don’t bring any benefit either. Such conversations, focused on how bad everything is with us, clearly do not motivate, but rather, on the contrary, lead to shameful behavior. We have problems and we have them, but shouting about them in every topic is obvious alarmism. As I wrote above, there should be a more or less objective picture, and not arguments about how everything is bad with us.
                    1. -3
                      14 July 2024 05: 55
                      Such a topic does not exist here at all, so you have to chop with an ax, and not eat from a spoon.
                    2. +1
                      14 July 2024 12: 48
                      Focusing on problems in the conduct of combat operations by the Russian Defense Ministry is precisely the surest way to solve them. The delicate and vulnerable have no place in war or in the leadership of the armed forces. Sometimes from the outside you can see better how time puts everything in its place. Who is who. Emerging problems in the Northern Military District must be resolved quickly and clearly, as Stalin did during the Second World War. Accusations of some as “all-overs” are a great nonsense. This is the 872nd day of the war. This is already more than halfway through the Second World War. The Red Army passed through the Kursk Bulge. The Russian army has been fighting head-on in Chasovoy Yar for more than six months; the battles for Stalingrad ended even sooner. I think the striped ones would have resolved this issue (with Chasovy Yar) faster and much more. First, they would cut out all air defenses around within a radius of 100 km. Then they would cut off all the supplies that go at night with bombings and Apaches and Hellfires. Without supplies, the entire defense of the Ukrainian Armed Forces would have ended. What happened for our General Staff happened. Everyone sees. You can’t win the war this way, you can fight out the war until the next agreement.
                      1. 0
                        14 July 2024 12: 59
                        Quote: cmax
                        Focusing on problems in the conduct of combat operations by the Russian Defense Ministry is precisely the surest way to solve them.

                        Especially on the VO website. All the decision makers have gathered. I have already said several times on this topic:
                        Quote: suhorukofal
                        We have problems and we have them, but shouting about them in every topic is obvious alarmism.

                        The essence of my message is that these cries here are not for the sake of solving problems, but for the sake of information noise about how bad everything is with us. I myself often mentioned our problems in my comments, I think this is normal. But here professional people have already gathered to sing about how “everything is wrong.”
                        Quote: cmax
                        Accusations of some as “all-overs” are a great nonsense.

                        I can play the same game. You somehow remember the experience of the Second World War partially and forget precisely about this alarmism and the practice of punishing it. According to your analogies with the USSR, justifying the “all-disappearers” was not just stupidity, it was considered a crime.
                      2. 0
                        14 July 2024 15: 26
                        “Especially on the VO website. There are a lot of decision makers. I’ve already spoken on this topic several times”......

                        You know, based on the results of the Northern Military District to date, taking into account that we were the first to go to the country, I don’t see any difference here, in the Moscow Region and the General Staff. There are the same people there, only they have power, that’s all. Many are squeezed by corporate discipline and superiors. Hence the lack of necessary weapons in the army's arsenal. I think the only plus from the war (may the relatives of the victims forgive me) is that we learned the real strength, or rather weakness, of our armed forces and realized the real backwardness in many types of weapons. It’s not even worth listing.....what we don’t have. Smart leaders will take this chance to set things right (for a beaten person they give two unbeaten ones), stupid leaders will build new “Potemkin” villages! I hope Victory will be ours and Russia will emerge from the war stronger. IMHO.
                      3. 0
                        14 July 2024 15: 40
                        Quote: cmax
                        There are the same people there, only they have power, that’s all.

                        Well, yes, businesslike. Haberdasher and Cardinal. To anonymous on VO and the General Staff, they will save Russia.
                        About what the war showed. Of course, it’s hard to disagree with you. But here everything is natural, like any turning point event, the war shows the strength of the system, the strength of the people. So it is with us. All sorts of degenerates showed their insides. This Defense Ministry also applies to representatives of our so-called elite, even ordinary people who surround us in everyday life.
                        But it’s not about how they showed it, but what changes will happen. For example, Peter 1 also started with defeats, but the situation was corrected. I repeat, this is not a reason to shout everything is lost, as some here do.
                      4. +2
                        15 July 2024 10: 02
                        I can play the same game. You somehow remember the experience of the Second World War partially and forget precisely about this alarmism and the practice of punishing it. According to your analogies with the USSR, justifying the “all-disappearers” was not just stupidity, it was considered a crime.

                        But at the same time, the authorities reacted quickly and harshly. She didn’t go and complain that she was deceived, she didn’t draw colorful lines. The same Shoigu and his deputies were in prison for how long? In WWII, commanders at all levels, perhaps even too harshly, were changed instantly.
                      5. +1
                        15 July 2024 10: 19
                        Quote: Single-n
                        The same Shoigu and his deputies were in prison for how long?

                        Oh, that's it! Joke. Yes, I don’t argue with that. And there’s nothing to say about the reindeer herder. HE still has to sit, and has been sitting for a long time, only in certain places, where there is fresh air, exercise in nature, a daily routine.
                      6. +2
                        17 July 2024 15: 45
                        It’s rightly said - it’s already the 872nd day of the war - we daily and methodically count the enemy’s losses on the LBS, while at the same time we don’t bother at all with how to block the enemy’s access to the LBS - why until now there have not even been attempts to destroy bridges across the Dnieper (except for the only one to Moldova) so that railway echelons cannot systematically and constantly deliver troops and equipment to the LBS?
                        Reminds me of a zombie movie (I don’t remember the name), when the machine gunner mows down one wave of the walking dead after another, while he himself enjoys the process itself.
                        This is how it is with us - instead of throwing our forces into eliminating the enemy’s military logistics, in order to prevent the replenishment of his forces at the LBS, we stupidly erase populated areas along with the enemy’s soldiers, working on the principle of a bloody conveyor belt, which increases our losses!
                        The USA and the West are happy with this (they don’t care about the Slavs and how many of them die), Ze and Co. are happy with this - he still rules the remnants of Ukraine, but why is this situation suitable for us???
        4. +1
          14 July 2024 07: 27
          Quote: suhorukofal
          How quickly, in one message, you moved from the loss of tanks supplied to Ukraine to the topic of bulldozers and caponiers in the Russian Army.

          Fuli, hot wassat Kapkaz lover of looking for Jews in airplane engines... wrapping his women in stinking rags...
      2. +2
        13 July 2024 23: 33
        All together, but not like in 41. The difference in people and conditions then and now is absolute. Moreover, reports are one thing, but what is in each person’s head is different. That’s why I don’t like questions about why I answered this way or did it in a specific period of time. Also, no computer can calculate absolutely all people’s actions. One person can miscalculate in a short period of time. The more people, the more options. No one thought that Ukraine would become the fulcrum for global changes throughout the world
        1. 0
          14 July 2024 07: 50
          But this is just in vain. That’s why the country’s leadership exists, to think. The most likely point was. The most dangerous for us and with a ready-made application, the frostbitten Selyukov Bandera mass.
      3. +3
        14 July 2024 11: 13
        Let's be objective, there are significant losses! The guilt of the leadership of the Russian Defense Ministry and the General Staff is obvious! The Russian Army turned out to be unprepared for the Northern Military District, and the losses of the Russian Black Sea Fleet turned out to be prohibitive. The change in the leadership of the Ministry of Defense and criminal cases among the command staff indicate that there is an understanding that there is a mess in the army. Our WWII HISTORY is repeating itself - we learned to fight in the 3rd year of the Northern Military District (read war)
    2. -1
      14 July 2024 12: 13
      In any case, the Russian army lost much fewer tanks than the Ukrainian Armed Forces lost tanks.
      1. +1
        14 July 2024 12: 53
        A naive person who thinks this way. Russia's losses in tanks are significantly higher. Take, for example, the fact that we withdrew from the Sumy and Kherson regions. After all, the non-combat-ready equipment we abandoned (a gesture of goodwill) fell into the hands of the forelock. And also to the question of damaged and lost combat units heard from our television boxes. Ever since the Second World War, we have liked to attribute the number of tanks hit. But history has shown that it is one thing to be damaged (later restored and again sent into battle), but destroyed is another thing. And our victorious destroyed trains. Rave. The victory parade clearly showed that all tanks, except the T-34, were at the front. And ours burn no less from enemy defeat than theirs. Have you forgotten how our columns were burned in the parade march in 2022?
    3. +1
      15 July 2024 13: 25
      Judging by the tone, they are reporting to you directly from the General Staff of the Russian Federation and the State Academic Technical University. Please announce the entire list.)
  3. +3
    13 July 2024 22: 50
    Those. To the tanks the Khkhlovs had, they supplied another 819 units, not counting infantry fighting vehicles, armored personnel carriers and other crap, of which 143 were damaged, well, taking into account the restored ones and other unaccounted for things, let there be 200.
    All the same, the Khkhlovs still have a pretty strong armored fist.
  4. +3
    13 July 2024 22: 55
    Why did these arrogant people suddenly take up the mathematics of hardware!? It would be better to count how many Ukrainians their policies killed and how many were maimed.
    1. +3
      13 July 2024 23: 13
      Why count them? They're not British...
      1. 0
        14 July 2024 07: 57
        Moreover, this is the task - to inflict such losses on the main geopolitical competitor that it will not be able to defend its resources and territories. Know, throw some firewood into the Russian military force. For them, there are no Ukrainians, for them it’s all Russians. In the 90s they managed to break away the outskirts of the Empire from the Empire, now they are developing their success.
  5. +2
    13 July 2024 23: 13
    that only equipment caught on camera lenses is taken into account

    it works both ways
  6. +2
    13 July 2024 23: 14
    Why did he become so scared that he became relatively new?
    relatively new M1A1 Abrams
  7. -6
    14 July 2024 00: 42
    "Russian troops could lose up to 2023 tanks from the beginning of October 365." It is interesting to compare these values ​​with official Ukrainian data, which are regularly published in the media. From fresh:

    The total combat losses of Russian troops from February 24, 2022 to July 13, 2024 are approximately 557 (+770 in the previous day) killed. The General Staff of the Armed Forces of Ukraine reported this.
    In addition, during the full-scale invasion of Ukraine, the army of the aggressor country lost:
    tanks - 8199 (+8) units,
    armored combat vehicles - 15779 (+24) units,
    artillery systems - 15216 (+58) units,
    MLRS - 1119 (+0) units,
    air defense systems - 889 (+1) units,
    aircraft - 361 (+0) units,
    helicopters - 326 (+0) units,
    UAV of operational-tactical level -12069 (+34),
    cruise missiles -2397 (+0),
    ships/boats - 28 (+0) units,
    submarines - 1 (+0) units,
    automotive equipment and tank trucks - 20461 (+52) units,
    special equipment -2556 (+13).
    1. +2
      14 July 2024 01: 01
      Quote: Tarasios
      It is interesting to compare these values ​​with official Ukrainian data, which are regularly published in the media.

      They're lying as always!
    2. -11
      14 July 2024 01: 31
      Quote: Tarasios
      The total combat losses of Russian troops from February 24, 2022 to July 13, 2024 are approximately 557 (+770 in the previous day) killed.

      For the sake of humanity, peace and in order to reduce the number of victims, Putin should hit the largest hundred Ukrainian cities with thermonuclear ammunition as soon as possible. Although this should have been done already in April 2022. Only this can stop Russophobia and the NATO war against Russia for 50 years.
      1. +1
        14 July 2024 19: 07
        Yes, this will stop Russophobia. The whole world will love Russia for such actions.
        1. 0
          14 July 2024 22: 21
          Quote: Yaroslav Tekkel
          The whole world will love Russia for such actions.

          Love or love, but the world must adequately assess the prospects for the results of the war with Russia. Neither Napoleon nor Hitler voiced goals to ban the Russian language, unlike Zelensky, Poroshenko and Kolomoisky who acted in this regard.
    3. +5
      14 July 2024 01: 37
      These are the losses we have. I couldn't even imagine this. A submarine was sunk somewhere in the steppes, and aircraft were shot down as if with slingshots; not every hunter shoots so much game. And the only people lost were killed during 2 mobilizations. And what about several million wounded? Damn, someone is cloning people along the way.
      1. 0
        14 July 2024 19: 09
        What's wrong with the submarine? Not in the steppes, of course, but in the dock.
    4. 0
      15 July 2024 13: 29
      Everything is clear with these idiots, but what kind of submarine is this, nuclear, diesel, from what Fleet, where was it sunk?
      1. 0
        15 July 2024 14: 14
        This refers to the B-237 “Rostov-on-Don” (4th separate brigade of submarines of the Black Sea Fleet).
        On the night of September 13, 2023, she was seriously damaged by a missile attack while in the dry dock of the Sevastopol Marine Plant. By the way, they wrote about this on VO.
        The boat was promised to be restored by June 2024:
        https://tass.ru/armiya-i-opk/19803401
        “Shipbuilders of the Sevastopol Marine Plant (a branch of the Zvyozdochka Ship Repair Center, part of USC) will complete the repairs of the Rostov-on-Don and repair the damage received on September 13, 2023 as a result of a Ukrainian cruise missile strike on the enterprise by the end of the first half of this year " (With).
        1. 0
          15 July 2024 14: 17
          Yes, indeed, I forgot. Guilty. Well, thank God it’s in the dock, we’ll restore it.
          1. +1
            17 July 2024 13: 08
            In terms of Black Sea Fleet losses (28 ships/boats)), taking into account heavily damaged units, this is relatively plausible.
            At least 7 irrecoverable losses confirmed:
            1. Missile cruiser "Moscow"
            2. BDK "Saratov"
            3. BDK "Novocherkassk"
            4. Large landing ship "Caesar Kunikov"
            5. Patrol ship "Sergei Kotov"
            6. Missile boat "Ivanovets"
            7. Rescue ship "Vasily Bekh"
            Three large units were heavily damaged by missile strikes:
            1. Submarine "Rostov-on-Don";
            2. BDK "Minsk"
            3. Small rocket ship "Askold"
            “Raptors” and “Chamois” definitely suffered losses, but it’s difficult to take into account - something was raised and restored + some very small things.
            There were reports of the destruction of the Cyclone missile launcher, but without confirmation.
  8. +1
    14 July 2024 02: 16
    It looks like Trump will clearly win the election due to today's assassination attempt.
  9. 0
    14 July 2024 05: 48
    Quote: North Caucasus
    Well, in addition to tanks, the Russian Federation lost many vehicles in supply columns. And these are not only cars but also people. Why did they go unaccompanied? How many planes were lost? There were no bulldozers to fill the caponiers? How many ammunition depots were damaged? Is this also a problem with bulldozers? If you investigate the history of the SVO, you will have many questions about the organization of everything. It's like 41 here. Why weren't we ready? Moles? Incompetence? Corruption? What?

    Well, speaking of investigations, in your text one can find signs of slander against the army, etc. You can always put an owl on the globe if you want. However, you know this because you do it yourself.
  10. -3
    14 July 2024 07: 57
    Loss counting system:
    Ukrainian Armed Forces: caught in the frame, bad, considered a loss. Didn't get into the frame, good, no loss.
    Russian Armed Forces: The Armed Forces officer said that he knocked it out, we believe it, and we consider it a loss. No videos or photos? No problem. The statements of the General Staff of the Armed Forces of Ukraine are the most truthful in the world.
    laughing
    By the way, this is reminiscent of the mudki with calculations of Wehrmacht losses during WWII. It was similar there. The tank was towed from the battlefield, which means it was not lost. And it doesn’t matter that it’s broken into trash. laughing
    1. 0
      17 July 2024 14: 22
      Exactly. Even in the TTB of the Tigers they had 300% losses, but... Everything broke down on its own, lack of fuel, blew up during the retreat, etc. That is, the Red Army fought somewhere to the side on its own. But they calculated the losses in tanks, anti-tank guns and self-propelled guns in the Red Army one by one.
  11. 0
    14 July 2024 19: 10
    What an ugly photoshop on the screensaver. Okay, we clone one-to-one, but why did they tear off the guns?