Evolution of the MLRS: after the collapse of the USSR and before the start of the SVO

24
Evolution of the MLRS: after the collapse of the USSR and before the start of the SVO

In the material The evolution of the MLRS: from the “Dark Ages” to the collapse of the USSR we looked at how multiple launch rocket systems (MLRS) were born in general, as well as their evolution in the 20th century until the collapse of the USSR.

USSR heritage


After the collapse of the USSR, work on MLRS in Russia largely stopped due to lack of funding. As for the countries of the East and West, several well-established trends can be identified.



In the East – we are talking about China and North Korea, they have taken the path of modernizing Soviet developments and increasing the caliber of MLRS. For example, on the basis of the Soviet Smerch MLRS, China created its own MLRS PHL-03, also of 300 mm caliber. At the same time, the maximum firing range of the Chinese PHL-03 MLRS with the latest rockets reaches 160 kilometers, and the ammunition load of the PHL-03 MLRS also includes high-precision projectiles.


MLRS PHL-03

In general, from the moment that guided missiles for MLRS came into service, the difference between MLRS and operational-tactical missile systems (OTRK) began to gradually disappear, although it is possible that this happened even at the moment when operational-tactical missiles (OTR ) ATACMS learned to fire American M270 MLRS MLRS.


Operational-tactical missile and replacement package for the M270 MLRS MLRS

In North Korea, based on the technologies of the Soviet Smerch MLRS, the KN-09 MLRS of 300 mm caliber was created with adjustable rockets with a firing range of up to 200 kilometers. There are several modifications of the KN-09 MLRS - with eight and twelve guides. Presumably, the placement of the KN-09 MLRS guides ensures batch reloading of four or six rockets at a time.


Modifications of the KN-09 MLRS with eight and twelve guides

The design of the Smerch MLRS was also developed in Ukraine, where the Vilkha MLRS was created, also with high-precision rockets. With Typhoon-3 missiles, the range of the Ukrainian MLRS reaches 200 kilometers.

An interesting feature is the use of a transverse gas-dynamic control belt in the Alder MLRS rockets, which provides the missile with exceptional maneuverability, so high that there was a project to create an anti-aircraft guided missile (SAM) with an active radar homing head (ARLGSN) from an American air-to-air missile AIM-120.


MLRS "Olkha" and its rocket with a transverse belt of gas-dynamic control

Projects for the creation of missile defense systems based on MLRS rockets clearly show the prospects for the development of relatively highly specialized MLRS into multifunctional complexes.

In 2015, in Belarus, based on the technologies of the Smerch MLRS, with the support of Chinese specialists, the Polonaise MLRS of 301 mm caliber with eight launch guides was created. In 2017, a rocket was launched to a range of about 300 kilometers. Projectile guidance is carried out using an inertial navigation system (INS), with correction based on satellite navigation data.


MLRS "Polonez"

Further, bigger, more powerful


China did not stop at modernizing the Smerch MLRS - completely new Chinese MLRS WS-2 (2004) and WS-2D (2008) were created with calibers of 400 mm and 425 mm, respectively, with a maximum firing range of up to 400 kilometers. According to some reports, at the final stage the flight path of the jet units can be adjusted from unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs). The circular probable deviation (CPD) of the WS-2 and WS-2D MLRS reaches 600 meters and is provided by the INS, so, most likely, we are talking about the usual adjustment of fire according to data from a UAV.


MLRS WS-2

In 2010, China developed the WS-3/WS-3D MLRS of 400 mm caliber with significantly increased firing accuracy. In addition to the INS, the missiles are also corrected according to satellite navigation data - only with the INS, the CEP is 300 meters, and when satellite navigation is used, the CEP is up to 50 meters (in general, for satellite navigation, the stated CEP is a bit too large; rather, we are talking about 5–15 meters).


MLRS WS-3

In 2019, North Korea created the KN-25 MLRS of 600 mm caliber with a firing range of up to 400 kilometers. Due to the long firing range and the small number of guide barrels, firing from the KN-25 will only be effective with high-precision projectiles, that is, the KN-25 is more of an OTRK than an MLRS. There are MLRS KN-25 with four and six guides.


Firing from MLRS KN-25 with four and six guides

Mobility and precision


In the West, they did not pursue a significant increase in caliber - first of all, attention was paid to maneuverability and tactical flexibility in the use of MLRS. No matter how far the MLRS fire, in modern conditions they can always catch a “response” from the enemy’s counter-battery weapons, so the M270 MLRS MLRS moved from a tracked to a wheeled chassis, simultaneously losing one package with guides, thus turning into the M142 HIMARS MLRS.


MLRS M142 HIMARS

In addition, new ammunition was created for the M270 MLRS MLRS and the M142 HIMARS MLRS, now these vehicles are actually used only with high-precision GMLRS rockets of 227 mm caliber and ATACMS operational-tactical missiles of 610 mm caliber (almost like North Korean rockets for the KN MLRS -25), the firing range and accuracy of which gradually increase from modification to modification.

The latest versions of GMLRS – ER GMLRS should have a range of up to 150 kilometers. The caliber of the ER GMLRS has increased to 254 mm, but they are still placed in the amount of 6 units in the standard transport and launch container (TPK) M270 MLRS MLRS (2 TPK) and M142 HIMARS MLRS (1 TPK).

The maximum range of the OTR ATACMS is about 300 kilometers; they should be replaced by the OTR PrSM (Precision Strike Missile) with a firing range of over 500 kilometers.


Launch of the OTR PrSM prototype from the M142 HIMARS MLRS

One TPK must accommodate two OTP PrSM, that is, the M142 HIMARS MLRS will be able to transport and use two OTP PrSM at once, and the M270 MLRS MLRS will be able to transport and use four OTP PrSM at once.


Placement of OTP PrSM in TPK

Separately, it is necessary to highlight the GLSDB (Ground Launched Small Diameter Bomb) missiles, created on the basis of the SDB GBU-39 high-precision small-diameter bombs with a jet accelerator. The GLSDB range reaches 150 kilometers.


GLSDB

Domestic development


In Russia, in the post-perestroika period, the modernization of the MLRS of the Grad and Smerch families continued, evolving into the Tornado-G MLRS and Tornado-S MLRS, outwardly almost indistinguishable from their predecessors. The firing range of the 122-mm MLRS "Tornado-G" reaches 40 kilometers, the combat vehicle is equipped with an automated fire control system, which allows firing without topographic and geodetic preparation and guiding a package of guides without the crew leaving the cabin.


MLRS "Tornado-G"

The range of the 300-mm MLRS "Tornado-S" increased to 120 kilometers, its ammunition included high-precision rockets, and an automated fire control system appeared, like the MLRS "Tornado-G", as a result of which the MLRS "Tornado-G" C" is sometimes called the universal tactical missile system (UTRS).


MLRS "Tornado-S"

There was also a very interesting version of the Tornado-S MLRS - 9A52-4 Kama with six 300 mm caliber launch guides on a KamAZ chassis, somewhat similar to the M142 HIMARS MLRS, but this vehicle did not go into production.


MLRS 9A52-4 "Kama"

An even more interesting development could be the Uragan-1M bi-caliber MLRS with batch reloading, capable of carrying and using either 30 220 mm caliber rockets or 12 300 mm caliber rockets.

Work on this machine began in the mid-90s of the 2012th century, but was then suspended. Then the work was continued, and in 2017, state tests were even started. It was planned that in XNUMX the ground forces would be armed with it. troop Russia was supposed to receive two regimental sets of the Uragan-1M MLRS, but the fate of this vehicle is unknown; it seems that the troops have 6 Uragan-1M MLRS units.


MLRS "Hurricane-1M"

In parallel, Russia was developing MLRS for engineering troops, namely engineering system for remote mining (ISDM) "Agriculture". This machine includes two packages of 25 barrels of 140 mm caliber (according to some sources, 122 mm), that is, a total of 50 barrels. Ammunition packages can be changed entirely. The equipment of the package may vary at the discretion of engineering troops with anti-tank mines, anti-personnel mines and their combinations. The deployment range of minefields at the ISDM “Agriculture” reaches 15 kilometers.


Work of ISDM “Agriculture”

In addition to the TOS-1A Solntsepek heavy flamethrower system, the TOS-2 Tosochka was developed on a wheeled chassis and with an increased firing range of thermobaric mixture projectiles.


TOS-2 "Tosochka"

There is also the TOS-3 “Dragon” project, the characteristics of which are still classified, presumably it will be a combat module from the TOS-2 “Tosochka” on a tracked chassis, it is possible that on the “Armata” platform.

During the visit of Russian Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu, a new bicaliber MLRS under the supposed name “Vozrozhdenie” was demonstrated, created on the basis of the ISDM “Agriculture”, which will be able to use both 122 mm and 220 mm caliber shells. That is, it will be able to use both ammunition from the Tornado-G MLRS of 122 mm caliber, and ammunition from the Uragan MLRS and TOS-2 Tosochka of 220 mm caliber.


Alleged image of the MLRS "Vozrozhdenie"

The question now is whether there will now be another MLRS similar to the Uragan-1M MLRS, but capable of using bags of 300 mm caliber ammunition and some high-power ammunition of a larger caliber, about 600 mm?

Conclusions


And so the Russian special military operation (SVO) began in Ukraine. Many misconceptions that existed before the SVO regarding the prospects of this or that type of weapon were dispelled. Artillery, including MLRS, turned out to be one of the most effective types of weapons that showed themselves on the battlefield. As during the Second World War, victory was often determined by the number of combat vehicles and shells available to troops to inflict fire on the enemy.

A new trend has clearly emerged - MLRS are especially good when they use not unguided projectiles over areas, but guided ones at previously identified targets. Now the beneficiary of the glory has become the American M142 HIMARS MLRS, which has pretty much drunk blood from the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation (RF Armed Forces). The Ukrainian Vilkha MLRS could have caused no less trouble, but the number of shells for it in Ukraine, apparently, is extremely limited.

However, Russia has its own answer - the Tornado-S MLRS, which has comparable characteristics, and new developments are on the way. We cannot rule out supplies of Chinese or North Korean MLRS to Russia; it would be interesting to see them in action.

In any case, the MLRS has a great future; in the future we will consider the prospects for the development of this type of weapon in the near and medium term.
24 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +4
    14 July 2024 07: 18
    As for the countries of the East and West, several well-established trends can be identified here.

    One of the main trends in the creation of modern MLRS systems is a move away from the use of tubular guides, reloaded directly at the position, to the use of transport and launch containers. This solution allows, firstly, to significantly speed up reloading, and secondly, it gives the system tactical flexibility, allowing the use of missiles of different calibers and different equipment from the same launcher, depending on the task at hand. Essentially MLRS and OTRK in one bottle.
    An example is the Brazilian MLRS ASTROS II and ASTROS III, which can use both rockets with a caliber of 70 to 300 mm, and tactical ballistic and cruise missiles with a caliber of 450 mm.
    1. +4
      14 July 2024 09: 11
      Himars somehow looks more harmonious.
      Regular 6x6 truck.
      All analogues are cyclopean 8x8.
      But he’s not clear about reloading.
      Replacing the soil bag looks effective. But who delivered this package there and unloaded it in a hypothetical planting or grove? TZM M14(3)?
      1. +4
        14 July 2024 10: 11
        8x8 is ASTROS III. ASTROS II - there are classic 6x6. And for the delivery of “packages”, the battery includes three transport-charging vehicles on the same base. Picture below.
    2. AAK
      +5
      14 July 2024 12: 01
      Everything is as usual, even the DPRK is already ahead of Russian developments in terms of launch range and ammunition power...
  2. +6
    14 July 2024 07: 35
    In any case, the MLRS has a great future; in the future we will consider the prospects for the development of this type of weapon in the near and medium term.

    The future in MLRS development is a carriage and a large trolley. Only the RF Armed Forces still use Soviet developments (albeit domestic ones), which do not show impressive results. The situation is also strange in the union state, where on the one hand there is “Polonaise” and 300 km of range, and on the other there is “Smerch” with its 110 km and the prospect of up to 200 km.
    * * *
    Maybe it’s time to teach the “grooms” how to harness quickly?
  3. +2
    14 July 2024 08: 20
    Quote from Frettaskyrandi
    As for the countries of the East and West, several well-established trends can be identified here.

    One of the main trends in the creation of modern MLRS systems is a move away from the use of tubular guides, reloaded directly at the position, to the use of transport and launch containers. This solution allows, firstly, to significantly speed up reloading, and secondly, it gives the system tactical flexibility, allowing the use of missiles of different calibers and different equipment from the same launcher, depending on the task at hand. Essentially MLRS and OTRK in one bottle.
    An example is the Brazilian MLRS ASTROS II and ASTROS III, which can use both rockets with a caliber of 70 to 300 mm, and tactical ballistic and cruise missiles with a caliber of 450 mm.

    You are basically right, but that “trick” already comes from the 80s of the last century (abroad). There was an article in the Western Military District somewhere in 84. There, even “secondary” Spain already had similar systems. But we have our own machine for each caliber, and reloading right at the position.
    1. +3
      14 July 2024 09: 38
      You are basically right, but that “trick” already comes from the 80s of the last century (abroad). There was an article in the Western Military District somewhere in 84. There, even “secondary” Spain already had similar systems.

      You are wrong. The only Spanish-developed MLRS - Teruel, which was in service from the early 1980s until 2011, had a “classical” design - a package of 40 pipes with a caliber of 140 mm.
  4. 0
    14 July 2024 08: 47
    My opinion is that the main issue now, taking into account the arrival of the new Minister of Defense, is the cost of these MLRS. On some resources they write that the same Iskander-M is almost mass-produced, several pieces per day, the price is announced at 25-30 million rubles per 1 piece. Perhaps the manufacturers are charging for a high-precision missile for the Tornado-S comparable to the Iskander, so things don’t go further than prototypes.
    1. +1
      15 July 2024 11: 49
      I laughed heartily about the Iskanders.
      But there is no need to confuse the launcher and the rocket.
      The rocket, yes, is mass-produced, but the consumption is daily. The price of an Iskander missile, yes, is probably similar.
  5. +2
    14 July 2024 09: 31
    And only Russia, China, North Korea and the USA took part in the evolution of the MLRS from 1992 to the present? Where are the rest of the countries? Brazil, Israel, for example. They have something to show. Belarus was mentioned in the article with one “Polonaise”. And in the DPRK and China there are not 2-3 systems, but DOZENS of different systems, both wheeled and tracked, have been developed and adopted. To really show the evolution of the MLRS, it was necessary to do articles on each state separately, and not so quickly and in one pile..
    1. +3
      14 July 2024 10: 03
      To really show the evolution of the MLRS, it was necessary to do articles on each state separately, and not so quickly and in one pile..

      Today, no one writes like that on the site except Linnik. The rest "fill the information space." There is no question of quality.
      And there is something to write about. Even the UAE has something to show in this field. One 240 - barrel Jobaria (first photo) is worth it. Moreover, it is multi-caliber and can use 122 mm and 107 mm rockets.
      And Jobaria TCL is on the way. This is already a High Mobility Artillery Rocket System. Can use both Chinese A300 missiles and Turkish T-300 Kasirga. Unfortunately, the photos are still bad; the Arabs are in no hurry to show them, so the quality is not very good.
    2. 0
      15 July 2024 12: 26
      Quote from buv59
      Where are the rest of the countries? Brazil, Israel, for example.

      So, for the same Israel, a separate article is needed. Because there were so many things sculpted there...
      I still remember this miracle from an article in the Soviet Western Military District of the 80s - MAR-290:
  6. +1
    14 July 2024 09: 44
    Quote from Frettaskyrandi
    You are basically right, but that “trick” already comes from the 80s of the last century (abroad). There was an article in the Western Military District somewhere in 84. There, even “secondary” Spain already had similar systems.

    You are wrong. The only Spanish-developed MLRS - Teruel, which was in service from the early 1980s until 2011, had a “classical” design - a package of 40 pipes with a caliber of 140 mm.

    Maybe I was wrong, after all, 40 years have passed, but the article cited MLRS specifically for batch reloading, and of different calibers. hi
    1. +3
      14 July 2024 12: 18
      Maybe you confused Spain with Brazil? The Brazilian Astros II has been in service since 1983. It is just modular, of different calibers. But at that time such a design was exotic.
  7. +2
    14 July 2024 11: 09
    Actually a good MLRS. I would even say that the BEST MLRS will be a combination of such characteristics as:
    1. Unified chassis (so that the chassis is the same as for other army vehicles, this simplifies and reduces the cost of maintenance)
    2. Double packet loading system (when the system has 2 positions for two packets, then it is possible to fire 1 types of shells from 2 installation)
    3. Geometric unification of packages (this is unusual, all packages, when observed from a distance, looked the same, then enemy air and ground reconnaissance will not be able to determine what exactly the installations are loaded with. It is even better if the shape of the packages is unified with the shape of the body of other platforms. That would the enemy, observing the convoy from the air, could not understand where the MLRS was going and where the field kitchen was)
    4. The ability to fire guided or high-precision projectiles by default
    5. Ability to fire at external target designation
    6. Full information integration for working with different tasks for all branches of the military.
    7. The ability to load some types of shells into the field directly, as in “packageless” MLRS.
    8. A wide range of missiles covering a wide range of tasks (the presence of not only simple and high-precision projectiles of various calibers for attacks on ground area and stationary targets, but also the presence of missiles for mining, for combating surface moving targets, for working against air targets, for combating moving ground targets, for long-range strikes with cruise missiles, etc.)
    1. 0
      15 July 2024 12: 31
      In general, it turns out to be "Polonaise". smile
  8. +3
    14 July 2024 11: 25
    Unify ground launchers for most types of missiles - MLRS, SAM, anti-ship missiles. This would make life a lot easier for everyone.
  9. AMG
    +1
    14 July 2024 18: 01
    Why doesn't Tornado-S hit 200 km? Is the fuel formula really unknown?
  10. 0
    14 July 2024 23: 49
    It’s strange that nothing is said about sarma, and even for a hurricane of 1 m, it seems that at the end of 2023 there was information that wax was received
  11. +2
    15 July 2024 06: 22
    Continuation of Mitrofanov’s “history of the MLRS” in the same “manner”! “I remember here (I write)... I don’t remember here (I don’t write)”! That is, he “jumps” through the “history of the MLRS” like a kangaroo across the Australian continent!
  12. 0
    16 July 2024 13: 57
    Does anyone know why, in the last 35 years, shells for MLRS with approximately double the range (with the same dimensions) have appeared? The same trend seems to be with cruise missiles. Has some new fuel appeared that is twice as efficient as the previous one? Or something different?
    1. 0
      11 August 2024 23: 16
      Fuel efficiency has increased, mixed fuel has a higher density and more mass can be crammed into the same size. In addition, the rocket itself can be made from lighter materials, such as fiberglass. Plus, the correction unit in the old tornado was hefty, but now it consists of several microcircuits, a battery and servos for the wings. Often they simply reduce the mass of the warhead, since the accuracy has increased and there is no longer a need to carry two hundred kilos. The smaller the final mass of the rocket, the further it will fly. Plus, at the top of the trajectory, the Americans start the engine again, and rocket engines in airless space are much more efficient than at sea level.
      1. 0
        12 August 2024 00: 28
        Interesting. Thank you very much!
  13. 0
    30 July 2024 11: 05
    In North Korea, based on the technologies of the Soviet Smerch MLRS, the KN-09 MLRS of 300 mm caliber was created with adjustable rockets with a firing range of up to 200 kilometers.

    The Smerch MLRS was not supplied to the DPRK. First, the DPRK developed a 220mm MLRS, and then a 300mm one. The system entered service in 2016 and was put into service in 2018. This is some kind of fixed idea to shove Soviet technologies everywhere. The only exception is American technology. Although in fact they are all originally German.