US Navy may lose four aircraft carriers

32

The US Navy will be forced to disable and preserve four nuclear aircraft carriers if the US lawmakers and the White House do not reach a compromise on the upcoming budget sequestra March 1, the report said to the US Congress.

The country's naval command indicates that the aircraft carriers "John Stennis", "Eisenhower", "Ronald Reagan" and "Roosevelt" will have to be put out of action "with different time intervals," Voice of Russia reports, citing Interfax.

Earlier, the US Navy has already reported that because of a possible reduction in the defense budget, it was decided not to send an aircraft carrier strike group led by the nuclear aircraft carrier Harry Truman to the Persian Gulf region, to cancel the reloading of the fuel and overhaul on the aircraft carrier Avraham Lincoln, postpone repairs on the aircraft carrier "Roosevelt".

At present, there are ten nuclear aircraft carriers in the US Navy. In the event of the failure of four of them, the naval forces will be able to have only six carrier strike groups. At the same time on combat duty in the Middle and Far East at the same time can be no more than two aircraft carriers.

The rest, who will replace them, at this time will have to undergo maintenance and minor repairs at the bases, and the crews - to rest and undergo training. Thus, the U.S. Navy will not be able, if necessary, to concentrate in hot spots a large number of deck aircraft aviation for applying massive airstrike.

For the preservation of the four aircraft carriers will also follow the downfall of the four wings of carrier-based aircraft. In addition, the long-range cruise of an amphibious airborne group of three large amphibious ships, headed by the aircraft-carrying universal landing ship Batan, has already been canceled.

Automatic budget sequestration - cutting spending on 1,2 trillion dollars, equally distributed between the military and civilian spheres - will begin in the United States from the beginning of March 2013, if the US administration and Congress do not agree on ways to reduce the budget deficit.

As the newspaper VIEW, reported earlier, the head of the Pentagon Leon Panetta stated that the Pentagon had begun to implement cost-saving measures aimed at mitigating the financial consequences of a large-scale budget cuts by the US Department of Defense.

These measures include, inter alia, refusal to hire civilians, postponement of some maintenance work and reduce other items of expenditure.

According to the US Secretary of Defense, reducing the defense budget will have "devastating" consequences for the country's national security.

Recall that a year ago, Panetta confirmed that the United States intends to reduce the number of armed forces by 2017 by 100 by thousands of people, which will be done as part of the country's new defense strategy.

In order to save, the defense ministry will also abandon a number of programs for the purchase and modernization of weapons and equipment. Also, the armed forces in an accelerated mode will carry out the procedure for writing off obsolete or requiring expensive repair of military equipment.

According to the plans of the American administration, the United States will change the approach to the formation of the armed forces: the American army should become more mobile and modern, but its numbers will decrease.
32 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Nevsky
    +13
    22 February 2013 12: 03
    Give the assembly of furniture at the enterprises of the American defense industry! wassat

    Seriously, it’s possible the United States, now the USSR in 1987 .... (the parenthesis is the shortage of goods, due to different economic models and the presence of direct sabotage in the Union)
    1. Nevsky
      +3
      22 February 2013 12: 05
      Although with the printing press and the theory of "controlled chaos", you can stretch for another 10-15 years ...
      1. +5
        22 February 2013 12: 06
        and I think, why will I raise my first glass tonight? .... now I know, for the good people-ships, John Stennis, Eisenhower, Ronald Reagan, Roosevelt, well, I won't forget the others, they got together and sang: " What are you curling around, black raven, on my head! drinks
        1. Gemar
          +2
          22 February 2013 12: 20
          Quote: strannik595
          for good ship people

          Wow! Retire Roosevelt, steamboat man! fellow
          1. +1
            22 February 2013 14: 47
            Forget gentlemen pockets increase.
            http://www.navy.mil/submit/display.asp?story_id=72259
            It says here that CVN # 69 "Dunya Izyakhauer" went to sea on 21.02.2013. Nurful and even with a "German friend".
            CVN # 70 "Carly Winson" also left Diego San to iron into the ocean-sea.
            CVN№74 "Joe SyStanya" in the vicinity of the "bay" is baked in the sun for 2 months. And this is not counting LHA # 5 "Batek", which grazes in the Horn of Africa region and LHD # 6 "Bonya Richards" which quietly drags from Sasibo towards the "bay".
            In the outskirts of Nurfulk, active educational "socks washes" are taking place during the last month, in which 2 AUG and 2 UDCs took part. I wrote about this last week and the week before last. soldier
    2. +9
      22 February 2013 12: 14
      And what news is coming to February 23 laughing
      Probably this year 23 we will celebrate with a special feeling of a LONG DREAM wassat
    3. Shoma-1970
      +2
      22 February 2013 12: 14
      This is the beginning of the end !!!
      1. avt
        +3
        22 February 2013 12: 21
        Quote: Shoma-1970
        This is the beginning of the end !!!

        Rather, the end of the beginning. Maybe the beginning of all beginnings or the end of all ends! laughing In general, it looks like a banal blackmail of the leadership of their Navy.
        1. +1
          22 February 2013 12: 34
          "Organize" provocative mess, in which the Americans will suffer, and the issue of cutting the defense budget, under the "pressure" of public opinion and imaginary external threats, will disappear.

          Old, proven method of planned provocations by the Americans
      2. +2
        22 February 2013 13: 07
        Quote: Shoma-1970
        This is the beginning of the end !!!

        This is the end !!! And mil, giving, will not know what kind of boyfriend STATES was the end.
  2. +2
    22 February 2013 12: 04
    The frayer's greed will destroy.
  3. +3
    22 February 2013 12: 05
    News ++++++, God forbid that everything be so! Americans stop printing candy wrappers, turn off ArtMoney laughing
  4. SPIRITofFREEDOM
    +4
    22 February 2013 12: 08
    I just do not understand one !!!!!!!!!!
    What is the US threat ????
    They chtoli all of Asia marching with 20 aircraft carriers with 20000 cruise missiles and tank battalions ????
    Brad!
    THE WORLD IS NOT JUST WANTED TO RELEASE. TRIMMED HEGEMONS
    1. Bashkaus
      +1
      22 February 2013 14: 59
      I’ll explain to you, very many people want to kick the Americans, they feel it with the sphincter
  5. +3
    22 February 2013 12: 09
    Well, storage is so storage that with the storage technique it becomes we know. wink
  6. 0
    22 February 2013 12: 12
    Automatic budget sequestration - cost savings of $ 1,2 trillion ... will begin in the United States in early March 2013 if the US administration and Congress do not agree on ways to reduce the budget deficit.

    I will be very surprised if "they do not agree" ... No.
    but how good it would be ... winked
  7. +2
    22 February 2013 12: 14
    And good news may come out, comrades !!! The "inflated" fleet of our potential adversaries, supported by many years of printing press work, when it stops, returns to its reasonable and rational size. Something reminds me of our 90s ... with the possible conversion of the military-industrial complex.
    Maybe they will let it go ?! What? Sounds beautiful: Roosevelt sewing machine, Abraham Lincoln kitchen set of pots with anti-radiation coating. The people need to be fed.
  8. Tom230
    +1
    22 February 2013 12: 16
    The hegemon is blown away! Soon in the USA it will be the same as ours in the 90s, only taking into account the number of weapons in the hands of the inhabitants of the USA, there will be an awesome civil massacre!
  9. +1
    22 February 2013 12: 22
    Ai ah ah a nightmare what ... The seas are empty without you ... And how are the AUG bases in the Persian Gulf now? so now perhaps there will be less "democracy" in the world? crying

    PS good good good Guys "democrat" well, give the pussies money, well, what are you ...
  10. Nymp
    +3
    22 February 2013 12: 24
    10 aircraft carriers even minus 4 = 6 are still a bit too much against our Kuzi! And they still blather about the threat to their national security! Would rather have gone broke
  11. +1
    22 February 2013 12: 24
    "According to the US Secretary of Defense, cuts in the defense budget will have 'devastating' consequences for the country's national security."
    That shit came up with. Russia at the same time coped with the 40 billion budget, although it was in the circle of "best friends". These pida ............. s 2 oceans wash. Above Canada (ally) below Mexico (it's ridiculous to talk about an invasion from its side). Thanks to this geographical location, they did not fight for destruction with anyone, and the economy lived on. And now they are afraid they are afraid:
    Ser, we spotted two Taliban on a camel. They crossed the ocean and take over the ocean.
    1. +1
      22 February 2013 12: 39
      Quote: Army1
      According to the US Secretary of Defense, cuts in the defense budget would have "devastating" consequences for the country's national security. "
      That shit came up with. Russia at the same time coped with the 40 billion budget, although it was in the circle of "best friends". These pida ............. s 2 oceans wash. Above Canada (ally) below Mexico (it's ridiculous to talk about an invasion from its side). Thanks to this geographical location, they did not fight for destruction with anyone, and the economy lived on. And now they are afraid they are afraid:
      Ser, we spotted two Taliban on a camel. They crossed the ocean and take over the ocean.

      ++++++++++++ Americans need more honest !!!! threat Not to national security, but to national interests ..
  12. 0
    22 February 2013 12: 26
    Yes! Their mentality is completely different. I'm afraid a possible scenario of the beginning of the end of the hegemon in the person of the United States will not be on the principle of "little blood", there you look not only disintegration into factions of states is visible, but revenge between the "southerners" and "northerners" shines.
    1. Barmen
      0
      22 February 2013 20: 10
      That's right!! Immediately, the Republicans with the shit will remember their swing. laughing And the Confederate army will rise up under its banners. laughing That's just how they will solve the issue with blacks ?! laughing
      1. 0
        22 February 2013 20: 50
        Quote: BARMEN
        That's just how they will solve the issue with blacks?

        Well, with this their problems will not arise! let the cannon fodder.
  13. +3
    22 February 2013 12: 33
    They plan to withdraw. They will cut back. Cut funding. All these are just plans, words. In fact, they are still very strong. To our great regret, there are visionary politicians. You have to keep your ear sharp. Yet our most likely opponent.
  14. +2
    22 February 2013 12: 49
    All the same, Obama is well done. Our person.
  15. +1
    22 February 2013 13: 00
    and in the framework of the mutual reduction of offensive weapons to offer them to cut these aircraft carriers into metal) Well, and we, in turn, cut 10 old barges))))
  16. pilot mk
    +1
    22 February 2013 13: 22
    Air wings will cut. Only the aircraft carrier that goes into the war zone receives an air wing.
    http://oko-planet.su/infonfoko/167531-rossiya-ssha-kto-morgnet-pervym.html
  17. +2
    22 February 2013 13: 28
    America, America is beautiful, but Russia is where there is power !!!
    1. lebron85
      0
      22 February 2013 15: 20
      Whoever shouts for Putin will tear one place, only Putin and no one except him is mostly Russia, they only need money from the Russians, they talk about their homeland, about its protection, but in case of war they won’t go to defend it, they’ll run somewhere in the best case, but most likely they will surrender and become accomplices of the occupation regime and will exploit us as slaves.
      Regarding the fleet, look at our fleet, except for strategic submarines, the rest is all outdated and have already exhausted their resources, and the new ones are the coastal zone boats and boats, which in the United States belong to the coast guard, but unlike them, we do not have such a public debt, the number of billionaires is growing, as Putin will say, GDP is growing (only any goods from toothpicks to high-tech products are labeled China, but are several times more expensive than there. For example, in the USA, Apple laptop costs 500-600 dollars, and in Russia almost 100000 rubles), so why if everything is so good we don’t have money for a contract army, the equipment is purchased only by the piece and which is not just obliged to be necessary. Why does the government shout that everything is good and there is money (or does it believe that everything is fine with a close circle, and they do not consider the rest as people, but only a means of enrichment), raise taxes, cut back on the social sphere, at the expense of the Olympics and the World Cup it would solve 75 - 80% of the problems of the army, i.e. there is money for entertainment, but not for the rest. If the authorities do not care for people, then this power should not exist
  18. Alikovo
    0
    22 February 2013 14: 18
    let all 10 aircraft carriers be cut and the building under construction frozen. drinks laughing
  19. Bubo
    0
    22 February 2013 14: 50
    Quote: "Earlier, the US Navy has already reported that due to a possible reduction in the defense budget, it was decided not to send an aircraft carrier strike group led by the nuclear-powered aircraft carrier Harry Truman to the Persian Gulf region ..."

    thanks, thanks, and so everyone already understood that you personally will not bother with the Persians.
  20. lebron85
    +1
    22 February 2013 15: 10
    URRRAAAAAAA for Putin, for Abramovich’s yachts, for Vickselberg (who doesn’t even live in Russia and runs Skolkovo, for Usmanov’s type gaster, for even more billionaires who stole what belonged to the USSR and now live on that they belonged to people who survived or participated in VO. Hurray for the increase in housing and communal services, food prices (worse than in the USA they distribute on food cards), for increasing taxes, for legalizing Gaster and giving them the same rights as us, and this will entail a fall in already low salaries and most will live in basements and dugouts, for the deterioration of the quality of education (give birth to more children so that they work for mines as Gaster and are afraid to say words, that they don’t know their rights and laws, but obey only EP), for the deterioration and paid honey. services even with insurance, for total restrictions (on light, water, gas - although we are rubbed by Gazprom’s national heritage, on freedom of assembly), for the almost free seizure of private property (I need land for you on the BTI and I go if I don’t agree uncles from law enforcement agencies will come and bring a case against you or the gopniks will break your skull, and it doesn’t matter if you have housing or not), for modern slavery (loans, mortgages), for the collapse of industry, agriculture, cars and aircraft construction, for yesterday militants who killed Russian soldiers and now riding a bentley and shouting that Russia is a pig and they need to be cut (if a Caucasian killed a Russian then 90% is a conditional term, and if you just hit a Caucasian you will get 5-10 years of 282 mines, and yours they will kill the family and will not seek anyone for it. In which country does a former militant and separatist lead a country’s subject, received the title of Hero of Russia and academician (even without graduating from school) and received huge subsidies from Russian regions for the murder of Russians, for the absence or non-observance of laws (there is no right to self-defense if they broke into your home and killed the attacker, they will put you in prison, it turns out that the criminals have more rights than the lawfully obedient citizens, the authorities create conditions for banditry and crime), for the colossal mortality of the indigenous population and its replacement with Asian Gaster (precisely because of the low level life, the population is dying and drinking too much because of a lack of prospects, so we give birth after all because we are not Gaster to give birth and live in basements) - all this and much more is the achievement of the current government and its leader Putin, URRAAAAAAAA for Putin, no one except Putin, only thanks to Putin, we are the best country and the rest are jealous, but only 80% of educated people dream of leaving here or are already leaving, and no one is going to run away from a bad USA, but on the contrary, everyone is trying to go there, where a Negro without education and without work having 3-4 children receives benefits how much a Russian engineer or other specialist does not receive in a few months. At a meeting of classmates, we are asked each other where you work and how much you earn, in the United States they ask only where you work, because an educated person can’t get a little, I’m silent about a career if you don’t stay in Russia in one place. I am not a supporter of the United States and it is not ideal, but there is much that I would like to see in Russia (laws applicable to all social strata, the value of education, whoever says this is the presence of family values, one cannot judge the values ​​and other parameters of society in USA by megacities, 78% of the population lives in small towns, towns, etc.).
    1. Grishka100watt
      +1
      22 February 2013 15: 25
      Have you forgotten the 90s ?!
      Do you offer a civil war to start?
      Who is this "we", no, do not generalize. Study better.

      I assure you: when they start shooting, you will forget about this nonsense first.
      1. lebron85
        +1
        22 February 2013 16: 06
        So Putin himself from the team of the 90s, a lot of travel to Russia, except for Moscow and St. Petersburg the 90s are still young where they ended, the Caucasus are generally separate states living on subsidies and according to their own laws (in fact, this is not Russia anymore and we have already lost the Caucasus, now the main thing is not to lose Stavropol, but there is already a civil war going on against the Russians). And you propose to be a supporter, for example, I don’t want to leave here, but I also don’t live in this lawlessness, and they don’t just give power away (especially dictators such as Pu), they come and take it away.
        Addition to the post above:

        Whoever shouts for Putin will tear one place, only Putin and no one except him is mostly Russia, they only need money from the Russians, they talk about their homeland, about its protection, but in case of war they won’t go to defend it, they’ll run somewhere in the best case, but most likely they will surrender and become accomplices of the occupation regime and will exploit us as slaves.
        Regarding the fleet, look at our fleet, except for strategic submarines, the rest is all outdated and have already exhausted their resources, and the new ones are the coastal zone boats and boats, which in the United States belong to the coast guard, but unlike them, we do not have such a public debt, the number of billionaires is growing, as Putin will say, GDP is growing (only any goods from toothpicks to high-tech products are labeled China, but are several times more expensive than there. For example, in the USA, Apple laptop costs 500-600 dollars, and in Russia almost 100000 rubles), so why if everything is so good we don’t have money for a contract army, the equipment is purchased only by the piece and which is not just obliged to be necessary. Why does the government shout that everything is good and there is money (or does it believe that everything is fine with a close circle, and they do not consider the rest as people, but only a means of enrichment), raise taxes, cut back on the social sphere, at the expense of the Olympics and the World Cup it would solve 75 - 80% of the problems of the army, i.e. there is money for entertainment, but not for the rest. If the authorities do not care for people, then this power should not exist
        1. Grishka100watt
          0
          22 February 2013 16: 38
          Are you ready to die for your words? I think no.
          Well, who will follow you?
          "power shouldn't exist blah blaaaaaa"
          1. Grishka100watt
            0
            22 February 2013 16: 44
            I think you get paid denyuzhku, but what you wrote here is just a mediocre retelling of the materials provided by people like you, so to speak.
            For only this is capable of voluntarily distributing this ..... not a very smart individual)
            In both cases, arguing is stupid.
            1. lebron85
              0
              22 February 2013 17: 46
              A denyuzhka is paid to protect thieves' power (defending the authorities and crooks they usually resort to the standard scheme - blaming your opponent for a weak mind that he is not a patriot, working for the State Department, sticking together a criminal case, starting to tell about the 90s and that without Pu and his team it will be worse that theft is a Russian tradition and the like)
              As for education - 2 diplomas in the physical and mathematical field, but I have to work in the banking sector, because they pay pennies in the specialty, and there are practically no places where you can work in the specialty (for example, where you went through internship, the organization was closed and now the offices of the companies buy and sell), and even knowledge of 2 languages, plus I can explain in Farsi (I was fond of history of the east). Just as you called me illiterate and looking at your profile, I can say that you are an alcoholic (it’s cold in Arkhangelsk), the school is from education and you will support Pu in some kind of front. And if you yourself can’t write 2 paragraphs, it doesn’t mean that the rest can’t; the rest may have a different opinion, unlike the news from the first channel, unfortunately for many, the brain can only fulfill the functions of natural needs and socialization mines. I’m not ready to die alone, but if there are more people like me and we will unite, then yes I’m ready to sacrifice myself for the future generation (including for the future of your children, including)
              1. Gemar
                0
                22 February 2013 20: 23
                Quote: lebron85
                if there will be more like me and we will unite, then yes I am ready to sacrifice myself for the future generation (for the future of your children as well)

                Hold on, man! I'm with you (nothing on you ???)! drinks

                The main thing in this business is not to overdo it. And then you know what a Russian rebellion! And so the population of the Russian Federation is declining (those who will argue the opposite - believe Pu further, he will not impress you like that), and the revolution will reduce the Russian population (non-Russians will run away).
                In the lessons of history, we were told one parable:
                1917 The old countess is sitting with her granddaughter, the granddaughter is reading something to her there. And then the noise, rumble, shots. Granddaughter runs to the window, looks. Granny asks:
                "What's going on, granddaughter?"
                "Revolution, bubushka!" - the granddaughter answers.
                "And what do they demand?" the old countess asks with dismay.
                "They demand that there are no rich!"
                "Eh-eh-eh" - the grandmother sighs crying, - "and my grandfather, the Decembrist, wanted not to be poor!"
                Any minus in your direction I will perceive as my personal, so keep your paw buddy! +++ And in PM! +++
                In general, for the most part it is our own fault that we have such a government. Well, we cannot organize ourselves like the Germans. We are all waiting for the "good" Tsar-father to come ... And then life will begin!
                Yes, they will not always consider us sheep! Russians go ahead! Good and kind, and educated non-Russian - good and peace!
                The Chinese nafig from Russia!
                Putin, do not dare to give the Kuril Islands! Is my grandfather in vain about Dalian?
                GLORY TO RUSSIA! soldier
                1. lebron85
                  0
                  22 February 2013 22: 39
                  Quote: "Gamer"
                  Hold on, man! I'm with you (nothing on you ???)
                2. lebron85
                  0
                  22 February 2013 23: 36
                  Quote: Gamar
                  Hold on, man! I'm with you (nothing on you ???)


                  Thanks for the support, because here mostly supporters of PU and the current regime
              2. Grishka100watt
                0
                22 February 2013 23: 09
                I have the first category in the bench press in the category up to 100 kg according to AWPC, I handed over last year in Vologda, March 11 (if I'm not mistaken), although I counted on kmc, but it didn’t work.
                You can see the protocols, in the internet there. With the name of Gregory there was 1 person. So, as you see, not a drunk.
                It’s cold in Arkhangelsk, yes. And the rest - sorry, you, uncle - ba la bol.
                1. lebron85
                  0
                  22 February 2013 23: 45
                  Quote: Grishka100watt
                  I have the first category in the bench press in the category up to 100 kg according to AWPC, I handed over last year in Vologda, March 11 (if I'm not mistaken), although I counted on kmc, but it didn’t work.
                  You can see the protocols, in the internet there. With the name of Gregory there was 1 person. So, as you see, not a drunk.
                  It’s cold in Arkhangelsk, yes. And the rest - sorry, you, uncle - ba la bol.


                  And besides the bar, what are you doing, do you work? When you work, you’ll understand what kind of garbage is going on around (especially if you’ll like me dangling all over the country), and if you don’t understand then you’ll rely on PU and others like that, you can change your point of view when there will be children and think about their future in this country
    2. Heccrbq
      +1
      22 February 2013 16: 04
      they’ll bite you now, but hold on!
  21. lebron85
    0
    22 February 2013 16: 05
    So Putin himself from the team of the 90s, a lot of travel to Russia, except for Moscow and St. Petersburg the 90s are still young where they ended, the Caucasus are generally separate states living on subsidies and according to their own laws (in fact, this is not Russia anymore and we have already lost the Caucasus, now the main thing is not to lose Stavropol, but there is already a civil war going on against the Russians). And you propose to be a supporter, for example, I don’t want to leave here, but I also don’t live in this lawlessness, and they don’t just give power away (especially dictators such as Pu), they come and take it away.
    Addition to the post above:

    Whoever shouts for Putin will tear one place, only Putin and no one except him is mostly Russia, they only need money from the Russians, they talk about their homeland, about its protection, but in case of war they won’t go to defend it, they’ll run somewhere in the best case, but most likely they will surrender and become accomplices of the occupation regime and will exploit us as slaves.
    Regarding the fleet, look at our fleet, except for strategic submarines, the rest is all outdated and have already exhausted their resources, and the new ones are the coastal zone boats and boats, which in the United States belong to the coast guard, but unlike them, we do not have such a public debt, the number of billionaires is growing, as Putin will say, GDP is growing (only any goods from toothpicks to high-tech products are labeled China, but are several times more expensive than there. For example, in the USA, Apple laptop costs 500-600 dollars, and in Russia almost 100000 rubles), so why if everything is so good we don’t have money for a contract army, the equipment is purchased only by the piece and which is not just obliged to be necessary. Why does the government shout that everything is good and there is money (or does it believe that everything is fine with a close circle, and they do not consider the rest as people, but only a means of enrichment), raise taxes, cut back on the social sphere, at the expense of the Olympics and the World Cup it would solve 75 - 80% of the problems of the army, i.e. there is money for entertainment, but not for the rest. If the authorities do not care for people, then this power should not exist
  22. lebron85
    0
    22 February 2013 22: 27
    Gamar Hold on, man! I'm with you (nothing on you ???)! ,
  23. lebron85
    0
    22 February 2013 22: 34
    Gemar,
    Hold on, man! I'm with you (nothing on you ???)