SAM S-350 "Vityaz" in Special Operations

36 337 74
SAM S-350 "Vityaz" in Special Operations
S-350 in the Special Operation zone


Air defense units and formations that are part of the Aerospace Forces are taking an active part in the special operation to protect Donbass. It has recently become known that units equipped with the latest anti-aircraft weapons are involved in ensuring the security of our airspace. rocket S-350 Vityaz complex.



These systems are capable of detecting and destroying various air targets, while demonstrating impressive results confirming the high potential of the new technology.

According to official data


Promising S-350 anti-aircraft missile systems began to arrive in the Russian army at the end of 2021. Thanks to this, the first units were re-equipped and soon began combat duty.

In 2022–2023, reports appeared about the possible use of new complexes and their crews in special operations, but there was no official confirmation of this.

The participation of the “Vityaz” in hostilities became known only on July 4, 2024. The Ministry of Defense published a short video dedicated to the work of crews of the Pantsir-S1 and S-350 complexes in the Donetsk direction. It showed part of the deployment process of the Vityaz and the launch of an anti-aircraft missile. The destruction of an air target was not demonstrated, probably due to the large distance to it.

On the same day RIA News published the first details of the combat operation of the new air defense systems. The agency interviewed the commander of the S-350 crew, who works as part of the Southern Group of Forces. An officer with the call sign “Lev” spoke about one of the episodes of combat work against real air targets.


Rocket launch

Recently, the commander said that his Vityaz anti-aircraft missile system (SAM) had to repel a strike from the HIMARS multiple launch rocket system.

The air defense missile system's radar systems promptly detected 12-16 flying missiles and escorted them at a distance of 90 kilometers. After this, the complex launched missiles and successfully hit all air targets. The missiles were intercepted at a distance of about 70 kilometers.

Combat S-350 air defense systems not only intercept MLRS rockets, but also successfully hit other targets. For example, RIA Novosti reports successful interceptions of enemy jet unmanned aerial vehicles and even ATACAMS operational-tactical missiles.

Positive review


In an interview with the news agency, the Vityaz commander spoke positively about his equipment. He highlighted its strengths and advantages, both operational and combat.

One of the main advantages of the Vityaz complex is the use of guided missiles with autonomous homing heads. This architecture of an anti-aircraft guided missile increases the reliability of target acquisition and tracking, and also facilitates its destruction.

The commander also noted the high speed of the complex. From the moment of target detection to its destruction during normal operation of the air defense system, about 8 seconds pass (probably, we are talking about a short-range missile). In combat conditions, this interval is reduced to 1,5–3 seconds, depending on the operating mode.

The commander highly appreciated the automatic operating mode of the complex. Thanks to him, the Vityaz did not make unnecessary missile launches, and all the ammunition used reached its targets.

In addition, the complex has other advantages. High chassis characteristics are noted, which provide high mobility and cross-country ability. This reduces the time spent in position and reduces the risk of enemy strikes. In addition, the complex is equipped with its own power supply and does not require external sources. Also, the complex’s facilities can be placed at a great distance from each other, which reduces risks.

Modern development


The S-350 Vityaz anti-aircraft missile system (SAM) is a promising medium-range system that has been developed by the Almaz-Antey concern since the late 2000s. The goal of the project was to create a new air defense system that would be unified with the S-300P and S-400 systems, but at the same time would have advantages in some characteristics.

The finished complex was planned to be used in the facility Defense to complement existing models. In 2013, a prototype of the Vityaz was first presented to the public at the MAKS air show, and soon after, its full-scale testing began. These tests continued until the end of the decade. And only in 2019-2020, the first S-350s were delivered to the training centers of the Aerospace Forces. And at the end of 2021, deliveries of serial equipment for the rearmament of combat units began.

At the turn of the decade, the Almaz-Antey concern launched mass production of new air defense systems. The process of re-equipping troops continues, but the volumes and pace of deliveries are not disclosed for obvious reasons. Nevertheless, we can already talk about a significant number of batteries and divisions that have been formed. This fleet allows the complexes to be used in special operations, protect airspace and demonstrate their potential.


From the point of view of the general architecture and some components, the S-350 air defense system is a continuation of the development of air defense systems with the letter “C” from the Almaz-Antey concern. The Vityaz project implemented new ideas aimed at improving the main characteristics that determine the effectiveness of combat use.

The S-350 complex consists of a 50K6 combat control point, a 50N6 multifunctional radar and from 6 to 8 50P6 self-propelled launchers. All these components are placed on the automobile chassis of the Bryansk Automobile Plant and are capable of moving between positions. Combat missions are carried out from the spot, after a little preparation. In this case, the complex can quickly stop working and leave the position.

The 50P6 self-propelled launcher carries a package of 12 transport and launch containers with anti-aircraft missiles. Vityaz uses 9M100 short-range missiles and 9M96(M) medium-range anti-aircraft guided missiles. The 9M100 missile is equipped with an infrared homing head and is designed to intercept targets at a distance of up to 15 kilometers. 9M96 missiles of various modifications are equipped with an active radar homing head and have a range of up to 120 kilometers. The maximum interception altitude can reach 30-35 kilometers, depending on the type of missile used.

With enhanced performance


Previously, it was repeatedly reported that the S-350 anti-aircraft missile system is being developed as a modern replacement for some systems of the S-300P line. The new project planned to use ready-made solutions and components, as well as propose several innovative ideas. This approach was supposed to significantly improve the basic combat characteristics.


One of the first "Vityaz" transferred to the armed forces

The most significant difference between the Vityaz and previous systems is the increased ammunition capacity of the launcher. The 50P6 installation is equipped with 12 missiles of two types, which significantly exceeds the capabilities of the installations included in the S-300P. Thanks to this, the S-350 complex can hit more targets without the need to reload. In conditions where the enemy uses high-precision aviation weapons or attack unmanned aerial vehicles, such capabilities are of particular importance.

It is also worth noting the choice of missiles for the Vityaz. The anti-aircraft missile system uses off-the-shelf ammunition that has been developed for other anti-aircraft systems. This provides a successful combination of combat and economic characteristics. In addition, it also simplifies and reduces the cost of supplying anti-aircraft missile units, which use various equipment.

Recently, the new S-350 Vityaz systems have been used during a special military operation. Together with other equipment of their class, they provide airspace protection from various threats. According to recent reports, this anti-aircraft missile system successfully copes with intercepting various targets, including the most complex ones. At the same time, it demonstrates high efficiency and efficiency in terms of ammunition consumption.

Proven by practice


So, one of the latest Russian developments in the field of air defense has not only been put into mass production and used by the troops, but has already been successfully tested during a real military operation. Details of the combat use of the newest S-350 Vityaz anti-aircraft missile system have not yet been disclosed, but even what is already known is of great interest.

The latest news confirms that the main ideas embedded in the S-350 project turned out to be correct. Thanks to high mobility and increased ammunition, these combat systems are able to hit more targets, including more complex ones, and also avoid enemy attacks. “Vityazi” significantly enhances the potential of site-based air defense, and you can be sure that they will be increasingly used.
74 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. 0
    12 July 2024 04: 41
    It recently became known that units equipped with the latest S-350 Vityaz anti-aircraft missile system are involved in ensuring the security of our airspace.
    Just units equipped with several complexes? How many S-350s were produced?
    1. +2
      12 July 2024 05: 34
      Quote: zyablik.olga
      How many S-350s were produced?
      https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/С-350#Операторы
      1. +10
        12 July 2024 05: 46
        found where to get information from
        1. +6
          12 July 2024 06: 23
          Quote: 501Legion
          found where to get information from
          Such as there is. Post yours if you can (by the way, wiki corrected, so go for it).
          1. +10
            12 July 2024 09: 07
            Correct, but not always))) democracy in action. The article about the fictitious Russian strike on the children's hospital in Kuyev is not correct)))))
            1. +3
              12 July 2024 09: 28
              Whatever you say, the S-350 is the best air defense system in its class and perhaps even in the world!
              If they had also made a mass-produced AWACS aircraft plus an AWACS UAV, and also mass-produced at least the MiG-35 to saturate the air defense aviation, and linked all of this into a single information exchange network, then there would have been no strikes on our territory.
              1. +9
                12 July 2024 10: 04
                Quote: ramzay21
                Whatever you say, the S-350 is the best air defense system in its class and perhaps even in the world!

                Potentially - this is a very good complex. Time will tell whether it will become the best in its class and how many of them will be mass-produced.
                1. 0
                  12 July 2024 15: 46
                  Bongo hi The question is whether they will put the AGS like the Buk M3 and S 350 missiles on the long-range ones from the S 400 and R 37m?
                  1. +2
                    12 July 2024 15: 49
                    Quote: Alexander Galaktionov
                    The question will be whether the AGSN, like those of the Buk M3 and S 350 missiles, will be replaced by the long-range ones of the S 400 and R 37m?


                    As far as I know, the 9M317M missile defense system used as part of the Buk-M3 air defense system has a semi-active radar seeker.
                    1. +1
                      12 July 2024 15: 52
                      There's like agsn Slanets? It seems they have the same AGSN as the Buk M3 and S 350
                      1. +1
                        13 July 2024 02: 39
                        Quote: Alexander Galaktionov
                        There's like agsn Slanets?

                        9M317M - PARGSN, 9M317MA - ARGSN. The main one at SVO is 9M317M.
                    2. 0
                      12 July 2024 15: 53
                      Semi-active maybe in the marine Shtil-1, it also illuminates the Nut?
                  2. 0
                    13 July 2024 02: 04
                    Quote: Alexander Galaktionov
                    The question will be whether the AGSN, like those of the Buk M3 and S 350 missiles, will be replaced by the long-range ones of the S 400 and R 37m?

                    The 40N6 has its own seeker with an active channel.
                2. +2
                  12 July 2024 17: 49
                  The S-350 replaces the S-300 and inherits the best characteristics of its famous predecessor and, together with the TOR-M3 and Buk-M3, will defend units of the Russian Armed Forces.
                3. +1
                  12 July 2024 20: 37
                  Quote: Bongo
                  Potentially this is a very good complex. Time will tell whether it will become the best in its class and how many of them will be mass-produced.

                  Here everyone is arguing about long-range missiles. And in principle, an active radio seeker is interesting, of course. But the choice of an IR seeker for close combat is puzzling. What targets can it take? Ballistics - definitely not. UAVs with internal combustion engines (large and medium) most likely - yes, with an electric drive - rather not. And will it take cruise missiles head-on?
                  1. +2
                    13 July 2024 02: 34
                    Quote: Saxahorse
                    But the choice of IR seeker for close combat is puzzling.

                    On 9M100 there is ARGSN.
                    1. 0
                      15 July 2024 21: 55
                      Quote: Comet
                      On 9M100 there is ARGSN.

                      Where did you get this information from? Everything that has been written about the 9M100 since the time of Poliment-Redut points to IR.

                      In the middle section of the trajectory, the 9M100 missile is controlled by an inertial system with radio correction supplied by the ship's radar, and in the final section - by a passive infrared seeker. The target is captured by the seeker immediately after the missile is launched.

                      This is topwar: https://topwar.ru/120625-novaya-rossiyskaya-zur-9m100.html
                      1. 0
                        15 July 2024 23: 11
                        Quote: Saxahorse
                        Where did you get this information from? ...

                        From Diamond and Torch.
                        Quote: Saxahorse
                        This is topwar: https://topwar.ru/120625-novaya-rossiyskaya-zur-9m100.html

                        And TopVar refers to
                        Quote: topwar
                        According to the blog bmpd

                        which has nothing to do with either Diamond or Torch.
                      2. 0
                        15 July 2024 23: 54
                        Quote: Comet
                        which has nothing to do with either Diamond or Torch.

                        Please provide the link. I see similar information in other sources, for example: http://war-russia.info/index.php/nomenklatura-vooruzhenij/68-vmf/oruzhie-vmf/kompleksy-pvo/2558-zrk-3k96-2-redut -poliment-redut-9m100-9m96d-e2-e2-1-sa-n-9-gauntlet-1989g

                        Sources:
                        Karyakin L, Soviet and Russian air defense systems of the Navy. "Arsenal. Military-Industrial Review” No. 4, 2010.
                        Missile air defense systems of the USSR and Russian Navy “Arsenal of the Fatherland” No. 3(17) 2015
                      3. -1
                        18 July 2024 00: 50
                        Quote: Saxahorse
                        Please provide the link. I see similar information in other sources,

                        Is this Diamond, Torch? Come to Army 2024, they will tell you everything.
                      4. +2
                        15 July 2024 23: 38
                        Quote: Saxahorse
                        In the middle section of the trajectory, the 9M100 missile is controlled by an inertial system with radio correction supplied by the ship's radar, and in the final section - by a passive infrared seeker. The target is captured by the seeker immediately after the missile is launched.

                        There is a contradiction right here in the two adjacent phrases. Why control a missile in the middle section with an inertial system with radio correction if the seeker has already captured the target immediately after launch?
                      5. 0
                        15 July 2024 23: 57
                        Quote: DenVB
                        There is a contradiction right here in the two adjacent phrases.

                        Yes, there are some inconsistencies in the description. We don't see the optical sensor in the photo. Perhaps it is covered with a fairing like on the IRIS-T, but how does it capture the target in advance? Moreover, a vertical launch rocket.
              2. -1
                18 July 2024 13: 58
                And also the MiG 1.44 and the Lun ekranoplane, and the Black Eagle tank.

                Dream, dream ...
            2. +2
              12 July 2024 13: 22
              Quote: Mikhail Nasharashev
              Correct, but not always))) democracy in action.
              In this case (edits to this article are not blocked) everything works fine, it’s just that no one expressed their wishes: exactly how much should I put in there?. Will it work like this, or should I add something?
          2. +5
            12 July 2024 10: 02
            To be fair, Vika, especially Russian-speaking, is not the most reliable source of information on this issue. In addition, the number of launchers is not an indicator.
          3. +2
            12 July 2024 23: 09
            The wiki is corrected if you are writing it from Ukraine or from Warsaw, otherwise it will be quickly corrected back. I actually read on the wiki that it turns out we had a landing party on the first day of the Northern Military District between Nikolaev and Odessa
          4. The comment was deleted.
      2. 0
        13 July 2024 19: 41
        It turns out that we only have one air defense system with the 6th launcher? I think more.
  2. 0
    12 July 2024 05: 09
    Knights in the troops. Hear it for the first time. And this certainly makes me happy!
    1. +10
      12 July 2024 05: 17
      Quote: Rus_80
      Knights in the troops.

      In fact, this complex is in trial operation and very few S-350s have been built.
      1. 0
        12 July 2024 07: 09
        Yes, that's understandable. Most likely, we are talking about one or two divisions. We hope that over time they will increase deliveries to the troops. The S-400 also once started with one regiment)
    2. 0
      12 July 2024 05: 34
      Quote: Rus_80
      Knights in the troops

      There is also a "variety" of the Buk-M3 SAM system, the "Viking"! They seem to me ("Vityaz", "Viking") like "brothers"! drinks
      1. -3
        12 July 2024 07: 12
        Vityaz older brother) Range is greater than that of the Buk-M3
        1. +1
          12 July 2024 12: 01
          But the Buk intercepts high-speed targets. Up to 3000 m/s. But Vityaz can’t do that
      2. +7
        12 July 2024 10: 16
        Quote: Nikolaevich I
        There is also a “variation” of the Buk-M3 air defense system “Viking”! They seem to me (“Vityaz”, “Viking”) as “siblings”!

        "Buk-M3" is conceptually and in its purpose a different system with a different principle of SAM guidance. "Brother" is the South Korean SAM Cheolmae-2 (KM-SAM) which has much in common with the S-350. Development of the SAM Cheolmae-2 began in 2001, it was carried out jointly by the Russian concern VKO "Almaz-Antey" and the machine-building design bureau "Fakel" in cooperation with the South Korean companies Samsung Techwin, LIG ​​Nex1 and Doosan DST.
        According to information published in open sources, the anti-aircraft missile for the South Korean Cheolmae-2 air defense system was created on the basis of the 9M96 missile system developed by the Fakel IKB. The Korean-made missile defense system is equipped with a combined guidance system: command-inertial in the initial and middle sections of the flight path and active radar in the final.
        Currently, approximately 15 Cheolmae-2 systems are deployed in the Republic of Korea.
        1. -1
          12 July 2024 12: 14
          Quote: Bongo
          "Buk-M3" is conceptually and intended to be a different complex with a different principle of missile guidance.

          Alas! I didn't expect such a "misunderstanding" from you! Then we'll have to argue a little! The 9M96 and 9M317M SAMs are "similar" in their main characteristics! That is, both "one" and "the other" guidance system: inertial command + active radar seeker ! The 9M96 has a pulse correction mode in the final section, but it may not be used! In principle, pulse correction can also be introduced into the 9M317M SAM! The S-350 SAM uses a vertical launch, and the Buk-M3 uses an inclined one, but with a high degree of approximation to the vertical ... Moreover, there is a modification (naval!) 9M317 with a vertical launch! A high degree of "multi-charge" of the launchers of both the S-350 and the Buk-M3! The ability to control "external" launchers in both systems! The 9M96E2 SAM has a "range" of 120 km and an "altitude" of 30 km; but 9M96E - 40 km and 20 km, respectively! 3rd level 9M317M - 70 km and 35 km respectively! What else do you need?
          1. +3
            12 July 2024 15: 46
            Quote: Nikolaevich I
            We'll have to argue a little then!

            There is nothing to argue about here!
            Quote: Nikolaevich I
            That is, both “one” and “the other” have a guidance system: inertial command + active radar seeker!

            9M317M missiles is a single-stage solid-fuel rocket, made according to the normal aerodynamic scheme. The length of the rocket is 5180 mm, the diameter of the hull is 360 mm, the range of the rudders is 820 mm. Due to the fact that the rocket is equipped with a more powerful dual-mode engine with increased operating time, the controlled flight range of 9M317M has been increased to 70 km. Reach in height - 35 km, flight speed - 1550 m / s. The missile is delivered and stored in an airtight transport and launch container, completely ready for combat use, and does not require on-board equipment inspections during the entire specified period of operation.

            At the main stage of the flight, the missile is controlled by an autopilot with correction by radio signals, and when approaching the target it is activated semi-active Doppler radar homing head with integrated on-board computer. However, this guidance method requires radar illumination at the final stage, which significantly unmasks the air defense system and limits the range of use by the radio horizon.

            https://topwar.ru/168498-sistemy-pvo-v-rf-zrk-buk.html
            1. +1
              12 July 2024 17: 08
              Quote: Bongo
              There is nothing to argue about here!

              The 9M317M SAM is produced in several "variations" (i.e. with different seekers!) I did not mean, for example, the 9M317ME with a semi-active radar seeker! Because there is also a 9M317 with a semi-active radar seeker! I always (!) "talk" about the 9M317M with an active radar seeker; i.e. about the 9M317MA SAM! That is why I compare the "Viking" with the "Vityaz"! And I point out certain "similarities" in the S-350 and "Buk-M3" systems! But it turned out to be difficult to convey this to the "especially gifted"!
              1. +1
                13 July 2024 01: 20
                Quote: Nikolaevich I
                o 9M317M with active radar seeker; i.e. oh zur 9M317MA!

                Tell us for the “especially gifted”: is this missile defense system produced in series and is it in the army? And I’m also very interested in your understanding of the difference between an object and a military complex?
                1. -1
                  13 July 2024 07: 42
                  1. The difference between object and military complexes often turns out to be conditional! And not only in tactical (organizational) application, but also in technical "equipment"... example: "initially" military SAM "Tor"! (SAM "Tor-M2" in modifications)
                  2.
                  Quote: Bongo
                  Is this missile system being mass-produced and is it in the army?

                  What is the point of this provocation? There were many things that were not in the SVO; but now they are! And what is not there yet will soon appear! But my comment was not about that! But about the technical "kinship" ("commonality") of the complexes! So... don't "twist the cards"!
                  1. 0
                    13 July 2024 10: 23
                    Quote: Nikolaevich I
                    The difference between facility and military complexes often turns out to be arbitrary!

                    Just for you, have you ever been inside the Buk and S-300P guidance station?
                    Quote: Nikolaevich I
                    Why this provocation?

                    To the point that you undertake to judge something that you have very little understanding of.
                    Quote: Nikolaevich I
                    And about the technical “kinship” (“commonality”) of the complexes!

                    There are much more differences than “relatedness”.
                    Quote: Nikolaevich I
                    don’t “distort the cards”

                    I have a rule - I don’t pick up playing cards.
                    1. 0
                      14 July 2024 13: 10
                      Quote: Bongo
                      Just for you, have you ever been inside the Buk and S-300P guidance station?

                      Why? If you judge the difference between the object and military SAMs by the cabin (although I didn't guess what particularly interested you there...), then that's your preference, but I'm not interested in "beating water in a mortar"!

                      Quote: Bongo
                      There are much more differences than “relatedness”.

                      Are you already picking on figurative expressions? You may not be understood, just as the second cousin of my friend did not understand and was offended when he refused to consider him a close relative at the first meeting 30 years after the birth of his "nephew"!
                      Quote: Bongo
                      To the point that you undertake to judge something that you have very little understanding of.

                      And I noticed that as soon as you began to take on topics that you had not studied enough, you began to “smear”!
          2. 0
            13 July 2024 02: 22
            Quote: Nikolaevich I
            The 9M96 has a pulse correction mode in the final section

            The 9M96 does not have a pulse correction mode. 9M96 - Anti-aircraft Guided (not Adjustable) Missile.
            1. -1
              13 July 2024 06: 54
              Quote: Comet
              9M96 does not have a pulse correction mode

              Where do you get these "template" ones? You can only understand template expressions! The 9M96 missiles have a pulse correction mode... if you don’t know this expression, then maybe the phrase will reach you: “lateral control motor ...
              1. 0
                15 July 2024 23: 01
                Quote: Nikolaevich I
                Where do you get these "template" ones? You can only understand template expressions!

                Well, everything was said about people like you back at the beginning of the last century by engineer Treukhov:
                “Of course,” he wrote, “the bolts can be called a transmission, ...

                Quote: Nikolaevich I
                The 9M96 missiles have a pulse correction mode... if you don’t know this expression, then maybe the phrase will reach you: “lateral control motor ...

                If the 9M96 missile defense system has a transverse engine Management, then how does the 9M96 missile defense system carry out pulse correction? Moreover, the 9M96 SAM DPU is not a pulse engine.
                1. 0
                  16 July 2024 00: 02
                  Quote: Comet
                  If the 9M96 SAM has a lateral control engine, then how does the 9M96 SAM perform impulse correction? Moreover, the 9M96 SAM DPU is not a pulse engine.

                  You are cleverly talking nonsense! You can continue, but without me! I can’t stand the squeals of the unfortunate...! crying
        2. +2
          12 July 2024 19: 14
          The development of the Cheolmae-2 air defense system began in 2001, it was jointly carried out by the Russian concern VKO Almaz-Antey and the Fakel engineering design bureau in collaboration with the South Korean companies Samsung Techwin, LIG ​​Nex1 and Doosan DST.
          It's a pity that not with the DPRK. At that time, our main politician was trying to prove to all the other bourgeoisie that he belonged (Mir station, bases in Cam Ranh and Lourdes). But they didn’t appreciate the deflection.
    3. +5
      12 July 2024 07: 55
      Knights in the troops. Hear it for the first time.

      Last year I saw these installations on the march, I won’t say where, but they are definitely there in the Northern Military District.
    4. +2
      12 July 2024 16: 25
      I already suffered losses; I was blown up by a mine in the Lugansk region at the end of winter.
      1. 0
        13 July 2024 10: 23
        Quote: Burer
        I already suffered losses; I was blown up by a mine in the Lugansk region at the end of winter.

        There was a different story.
  3. +2
    12 July 2024 05: 49
    The Vityaz air defense missile system has a launcher for 12 anti-aircraft missiles... But there are 2 "varieties" of missiles! (9M96E and 9M96E2) They differ in range, altitude and weight... The 9M96E2 with a range of up to 120 km (some say up to 150 km...) and an "altitude" of up to 30 km is not always necessary! Then the 9M96E with a range of up to 40 km and an altitude of up to 20 km may also be useful! Due to its lower weight, it is "easily" possible to use a launcher for 16 missiles! P.S. I am not at all sure that the 9M100 anti-aircraft missiles are used in the SVO!
    1. UAT
      +2
      12 July 2024 10: 04
      Respected
      Nikolaevich I
      , I’m embarrassed to ask, what is it
      Very unsure
      . Please translate into Russian.
      1. +3
        12 July 2024 11: 01
        Quote: UAT
        Very unsure
        . Please translate into Russian.

        And here it is in Russian! It is just that an older and now less commonly used form of meaning is used! And to you, judging by the nitpicking, it is more important to "checkers" than to "to go"!
        1. UAT
          +3
          12 July 2024 18: 25
          That’s exactly what I wanted to go, but I didn’t understand where you were going and asked me to explain. But I received no explanation.
          1. -2
            12 July 2024 18: 51
            Quote: UAT
            I didn't receive an explanation.

            Why explanations? I see that you still won’t understand! It’s none of your business!
            1. UAT
              0
              13 July 2024 13: 35
              It’s sad that the main argument “also put on a hat”
    2. +1
      13 July 2024 02: 24
      Quote: Nikolaevich I
      But there are 2 “varieties” of missiles! (9M96E and 9M96E2)

      9M96E2 and 9M100. 9M96E is not needed on the S-350E.
    3. 0
      13 July 2024 02: 31
      Quote: Nikolaevich I
      A 9M96E2 with a range of up to 120 km (some say up to 150 km...) and an “altitude” of up to 30 km is not always necessary! Then the 9M96E with a range of up to 40 km and an altitude of up to 20 km may come in handy!

      The 9M96E is designed for ships that cannot accommodate the 9M96E2. If the 9M96E2 fits, then it is always and in everything (except for a small difference in the near border of the zone) better than the 9M96E.
      1. 0
        17 July 2024 22: 07
        If the 9M96E2 fits, then it is always and in everything (except for a small difference in the near border of the zone) better than the 9M96E.

        The 9M96E2 is probably several times more expensive than the shorter-range 9M96E.
        1. 0
          17 July 2024 23: 05
          Quote: assault
          9M96E2 is certainly several times more expensive than the shorter-range 9M96E

          These missiles differ only in the solid propellant rocket motor.
  4. +4
    12 July 2024 08: 40
    SAM radar systems promptly detected 12–16 incoming missiles

    To be honest, this phrase really confused me. So they found 12 or 16, or maybe 14? And if you don’t know how many missiles have been detected, then.........It’s not clear at all.
  5. 0
    12 July 2024 09: 41
    Everything is fine, but I have a question: S350 and BukM3, plus or minus, in the same weight.
    Do they have anything unified? ZR, Radars, maybe something else?
    1. -1
      12 July 2024 14: 02
      Currently, 12 missiles are “nothing”. During mass launches, it is enough to miss just one high-precision missile and... kirdyk, especially if it has a cluster warhead. . In addition, the complex is large and inconvenient to covertly deploy and camouflage. .
      1. 0
        12 July 2024 14: 05
        Well, 12 targets will be hit, but there’s only one... Over there in Kyiv, 5 calibers arrived at the factory, but there’s only one.
        1. +1
          13 July 2024 13: 49
          There were X-101s, not calibers
      2. +1
        13 July 2024 19: 58
        12 on one launcher, in a division 6-8 launchers - a total of 72-96 missiles. Still not enough for you?
        This is if the missiles are 9M96, and 9M100, 1 pieces fit in 3 container, if I’m not mistaken.
    2. 0
      12 July 2024 15: 44
      Missiles, or more precisely, AGS. Although the Buk M3 has a radar for low-altitude targets, the S 350 does not.
      1. 0
        13 July 2024 02: 26
        Quote: Alexander Galaktionov
        Although the Buk M3 has a radar for low-altitude targets, the S 350 does not

        MFRs can be located on special towers.
  6. 0
    12 July 2024 15: 59
    It seems like the naval Buk-Shtil-1 has proven itself well, should they be installed on the modernized frigates? The Pr 1155 is the best.
    1. 0
      13 July 2024 20: 44
      Where and how did Shtil show himself?
  7. 0
    12 July 2024 16: 01
    Bongo, will you write an article on air defense missiles, VKS?
    1. -1
      12 July 2024 21: 17
      Quote: Alexander Galaktionov
      Bongo, will you write an article on air defense missiles, VKS?

      Is it necessary? If Bongo does not know that the 9M317M SAM is modular in terms of its seeker! In the version where the SAM is equipped with a semi-active radar seeker (9E432), the modification is called, for example, 9M317ME... When the 9M317M SAM is equipped with an active radar seeker (Slanets), the SAM is called the 9M317MA...! I tried to "convey" this to this comrade, but he stubbornly repeated, like a dictaphone, that the 9M317M only has a semi-active seeker!
      1. +3
        13 July 2024 01: 58
        Quote: Nikolaevich I
        Is it necessary?

        If you are sure that you are better informed than me, then you can write an article on this topic yourself. However, I don’t understand at all why you are getting personal? Did I spit in your soul?
    2. +2
      13 July 2024 02: 00
      Quote: Alexander Galaktionov
      Bongo, will you write an article on air defense missiles, VKS?

      No, I will not write about what is currently used in the database, as well as about what does not exist in nature.
  8. 0
    13 July 2024 02: 06
    The 9M100 missile is equipped with an infrared homing head and is designed to intercept targets at a distance of up to 15 kilometers.

    I wonder when VO will finish writing this crap about IKGSN on 9M100? On 9M100 there is ARGSN!