Footage of the RBU-6000 naval rocket launcher operating as a land weapon in the Chasov Yar area is shown.

Footage has been published online showing the combat operation of the ship's RBU-6000 rocket launcher. A naval rocket launcher successfully hit concentrations of enemy personnel in the Chasov Yar area.

It is reported that an enemy reserve gathered in the forest belt, which was destroyed using the RBU-6000 installation delivered to the position. At the same time, the ship's bomb launcher demonstrated satisfactory accuracy and fire results.

RBU-6000 ("Smerch-2") - a Soviet jet naval bomb launcher with a stationary two-plane guided installation with twelve radially located barrels. Initially, the installation was designed to destroy enemy submarines and attacking torpedoes. The range of the RBU-6000 is 300-5800 meters. Rate of fire - 2,4 shots per second. The installation is capable of firing high-explosive rocket depth charges RGB-60 with a remote-impact fuse UDV-60.

Earlier it was reported that the enemy admits the complete loss of the Kanal microdistrict in Chasovy Yar. Ukrainian monitoring resources record on their maps the complete control of the Russian Armed Forces over the territory up to the Seversky Donets-Donbass canal. In addition, the enemy notes the liberation of the settlement of Yuryevka by Russian troops and control over the southwestern part of New York (Novgorodsky), as well as significant advancement of the Russian Armed Forces in Krasnogorovka.

Comments

[I dare to_notice_]

The ship's bomb launcher demonstrated satisfactory accuracy and fire results.
Too shy to ask...
Is “satisfactory” a C grade?
I wonder... how much would the “reserve gathered in the forest belt” evaluate the result of the impact?

[your1970]

At the beginning of SVO there was an article about them on VO. Apparently he survived...

[Machito]

But they say that the Black Sea Fleet does not participate in the Northern Military District.
He participates, he still participates.
I like this Russian ingenuity of ours.
And you shouldn’t forget about the submarine in the steppes of Ukraine.

[Saburov_Alexander53]

The next gift will be the use of torpedoes in Kherson and Zaporozhye... you just need to drag the torpedo tube to the Dnieper.

[Machito]

No. First we need to torpedo the bridges across the Dniester and Southern Bug.

[Saburov_Alexander53]

First we need to torpedo the bridges across the Dniester and Southern Bug.
I joked about Kherson and Zaporozhye, although there you just need to shoot across the Dnieper. But to hit bridges in Zatoka or Nikolaev with torpedoes... if they could, they would have done it long ago. But we can’t even take them with missiles and it looks like we’ve abandoned this idea completely. But torpedoes don’t travel that far... from what carrier should they be launched? A surface ship will not be allowed so close to the shore, and a submarine will not go into shallow water with depths of up to 50 meters at a firing distance - it’s more expensive for itself.

[Machito]

If you believe Maxim Klimov, not everything is good with our torpedoes, especially with long-range ones.
For attacks on the coast of Ukraine, torpedo boats based on Raptor are needed.

[Saburov_Alexander53]

What's the point of hitting the coast? It won't be possible to get a direct hit on a significant object, and torpedoes can't maneuver using GPS, so any of our boats will be destroyed from the air before it can get close to the target.
I have been familiar with the work of M. Klimov for ten years, especially through his articles and discussions on the naval websites “Avtonomka” and “Fleet”. There he had to enter into heated discussions not with ordinary people far from the fleet, but with colleagues deeply involved in the topic. And I must say that these discussions did not always look decent when it came to direct insults and labeling. Particularly heated was the discussion on Admiral V. Ryazantsev’s book “In the Wake of Death,” about the sinking of the Kursk nuclear submarine.

[Vasyan1971]

“Is ‘satisfactory’ a C grade?”©
This is when I satisfied it “excellent”.

[Enceladus]

Quote: I dare_notice_

Is “satisfactory” a C grade?

It was not created for the tasks of the RZSO... its task is to cover the area where an acoustic target is detected, where accuracy is more evil than good... 1 bomb gives a submarine a damage radius of up to 50 meters in the water, and the external one can damage much more... a shock wave in water is a more evil thing than in air, I think everyone knows. The larger the affected area in the salvo, the higher the probability.

[I dare to_notice_]

This means... using it in forest belts is not effective.
Or is this already... despair?

[Enceladus]

Unguided weapons by themselves are ineffective - they hit areas by definition - it all depends on the situation. If the situation allowed it to be used, it was used.

[I dare to_notice_]

It’s just that, probably out of thoughtlessness, I used to think that if a weapon is specially “planed” for the fleet and there is no such thing in the ground version, then this is not without reason.
Live forever, learn... (V.I. Lenin)

[Enceladus]

No, a lot of naval weapons are adapted for land use, but there is simply no way to do it (this is the case here) - they just bolted it to the chassis and, of course, there is no automatic kill gun, like the naval one - everything is the old fashioned way - by blacks Just remember how many naval guns came to land and which are considered the best of their kind... especially large calibers?... a carriage and a small cart. And so it is in many countries. Yes, even the banal guns, the same highly specialized ground guns, also turned.... Take anti-aircraft guns - the enormous speeds necessary to destroy aircraft and for 30 years were in service precisely as anti-aircraft guns - suddenly became anti-tank when the tanks realized that bulletproof armoring was somehow not kosher
So if it is possible to use something for other purposes, this has never stopped anyone

[Vlad2012]

It’s just that artillerymen in general and anti-aircraft gunners in particular have always been one of the goals of tankers in an offensive - to get to them before they have time to escape and crush the guns with their tracks. So from the very beginning they learned to repel tank attacks simply out of a sense of self-preservation. Like all artillerymen, whose guns are capable of firing more or less flatly.

[Enceladus]

Quote: Vlad2012

It’s just that artillerymen in general and anti-aircraft gunners in particular have always been one of the goals of tankers in the offensive

and when the T-34 and the KV... the artillerymen were razed to the ground with mallets - the famous 8.8 came to the rescue Which only the IS-2 could fight head-on in the end

[BASHAR ASAD]

Live forever, learn forever - you will die a fool. This is what the full version sounds like

[Petr_Koldunov]

Quote: I dare_notice_

I, probably out of thoughtlessness, used to think that if a weapon is specially “tailored” for the fleet and there is no such thing in the ground version, then this is not without reason.

Not necessarily. During the Russo-Japanese War, the First World War (and the Second too) - large caliber naval guns were taken from ships to the shore and coastal batteries were created, which fired from the shore no worse than from the water.
And the small caliber also did not hesitate to change shoes for land use. In the First World War, for example, Hotchkiss ship's rapid-fire guns were even placed directly in the trenches and fired at the advancing enemies. And they received only rave reviews.

[Egeny]

Well, why be sarcastic, S-z, if our ship’s equipment is used, it means they noticed something in the steppe... Maybe they are testing the characteristics.)
And let the sailors practice, they shouldn’t shoot at seagulls.)

[bulbash70]

what despair? I can’t even imagine how many bombs are in storage in the naval arsenals for installations, Soviet ones, that are not installed on Russian ships. There is a banal disposal of ammunition. The effectiveness is satisfactory. There are no damaging elements.

[APASUS]

This is due to poverty. How come, where have all the factories producing weapons gone?

[KCA]

You have a high rank in military training, but have you served in the army? Were you in the field, or even more so in combat? Anything that fits into your mouth will do, no, not about sex, about food, and about weapons, factories are only on the go, not everything is on the Internet, but despite the first section, there is a lot of information, well, not for any Anunnaki, of course

[BAI]

Whatever fits in your mouth will do

Not everything that is crammed in incorrectly will be for the good
At the same time, we must clearly understand that the best weapon is the one that exists. What is not there will not be useful in battle

[APASUS]

Quote: KCA

You have a high rank in military training, but have you served in the army? Were you in the field, or even more so in combat?

Served and took part in the database. But I am deeply convinced that not everything that can be shot must be taken to war. It is advisable to use a variety of weapons.
Here's an example: How much has been said and retold about installations for NAR on equipment. This has its own specifics. The S-8 rocket is centered due to the initial speed of the aircraft. But when launched from the ground, it is a waste of ammunition, it flies wherever it wants. And at the moment. This phrase hides what?

the ship's bomb launcher demonstrated satisfactory accuracy

Moreover, the fuse has to be redone

[KCA]

S-8/12 from an airplane? Are they used on airplanes besides the SU-25? Helicopters are the main carriers, they can be equipped, but what’s the point? SU-57 reduces speed by 5 times and shoots back NURS?

[faiver]

this is not due to poverty, but rational thinking, there is plenty of this in warehouses and it is free

[Sergey Kulikov_3]

This is out of generosity, there are gifts lying around in warehouses, why not treat the mouse brothers with them?

[Mxabr]

They repurposed them and printed banknotes for generals for bribes. The Russian generals love them too much. And he pulls bags.

[igorbrsv]

It would be nice if they built a granite ground launcher for anti-ship missiles. In naval arsenals, ammunition is rusting. Then the Yemenis could also be given a hundred or two anti-ship missiles

[Ryaruav]

It turns out there are not enough MLRS in the troops, this bomb launcher is much worse than TOS systems

[Gomunkul]

It turns out there are not enough MLRS in the troops

It looks like it.

RBU-6000 is used quite widely in the North-West region. One of the reasons is the availability and large reserves of installations and ammunition for them.

[faiver]

maybe it is not enough, but now tell me, what commander would refuse to strengthen his unit if there is access to replenishment of ammunition? When is it not necessary to ask for fire support from the authorities?

[Rom8681]

Quote: APASUS

This is due to poverty. How come, where have all the factories producing weapons gone?

I thought the same thing too

[South Ukrainian]

A great thing if the enemy is one and a half to two kilometers away. Jump up, hit and leave. Only reloading manually is a bit difficult.

[Height76]

And the enemy is just waiting for you to jump 2 km towards him on such a fool that only a blind person would not notice

[tralflot1832]

How much of this stuff was stored at the "miracle shipyards" under the USSR and at the arsenals of the Navy - the sea!!! And try to sell it for metal - article! The entire fishing fleet (medium tonnage) was turned into auxiliary "battleships" before the first battle.

[aszzz888]

tralflot1832
(Andrey S.)
+1
Today, 11: 46
New
How much of this stuff was stored in the “miracle shipyards” of the USSR and in the arsenals of the Navy - the sea!!! And try to sell it for metal - article!The entire fishing fleet (medium-sized) was turned into auxiliary "battleships" before the first battle.

Yes, there is such a party))! But he fulfilled his task with honor, especially during the Second World War. Ladoga, Caspian Sea, etc. Everything coastal) worked for Victory!

[Height76]

That case when poverty is presented as a virtue

[aszzz888]

You can see the combat operation of the ship's RBU-6000 rocket launcher. A naval rocket launcher successfully hit concentrations of enemy personnel in the Chasov Yar area.

I don’t know how it is on land, but in the sea this product is completely impressive!
I hope that RBUshka will not let you down on land either!

[Height76]

Who is impressed by this product at sea? Pirates on rubber boats?

[aszzz888]

Height76
(Height76)
-1
Today, 11: 58
New
Who is impressed by this product at sea? Pirates on rubber boats?

Yeah! A complete lack of understanding. Why then are you making comets?

[faiver]

Well, he wants to throw some brown substance on the fan

[Height76]

As I understand it, you are ready to drive up to the LBS in this thing in the first rows?

[Height76]

As I understand it, you are ready to drive up to the LBS in this thing in the first rows?

[MCmaximus]

In general, it’s quite suitable as an anti-torpedo weapon. And hitting the fortification point-blank won’t seem too bad either. Yes, so why not use it?
I remember our soldiers used 305-mm RSs in urban battles during that war. They welded something like skids and launched them from the entrance into the neighboring house with the Germans. Also not for the intended purpose. But there were no complaints. The same drones are 100% amateur due to the lack of “their own” art, etc.

[Alexey Lantukh]

Once I worked on the railway. I had a fellow soldier, an artillery officer. He told me: in 41 they gave me a battery of 76 mm short-barreled guns with almost wooden wheels, pre-revolutionary production. So I fought until 42, until the guns were destroyed. So, they always fought with what they had. Nothing new. It seems that in the 90s they managed to sell off a lot of the better stuff from warehouses.

[MCmaximus]

Yes, in any war there is always not enough of everything.
And there is also a concept - standard weapons. And if you are not entitled to "Grad" by the state, then they will not give it to you. It would be good if there were smart generals. Tossed. What if they are just generals?
The native fleet (Pacific Fleet) is concerned. And throws in what it has. And old machine guns and bomb throwers. Anything is better than nothing. And the other fleet (Black Sea Fleet) did not provide machine guns against surface drones. It is not allowed. We know the result.

[Strannik96]

Quote: aszzz888

Height76
(Height76)
-1
Today, 11: 58
New
Who is impressed by this product at sea? Pirates on rubber boats?

Yeah! A complete lack of understanding. Why then are you making comets?

And his task is to be dissatisfied. Does a lot of good at the front

[swnvaleria]

The commandant fired from one of these in a large-caliber commotion, beautiful!

[Cat Alexandrovich]

Of course, it’s better to dispose of the bonbas that have accumulated on the rocks over the years by knocking the pots off the khokhloboshkas...

[Simple]

The feasibility of this device depends directly on the task at hand.
If stormtroopers were planned to rush into the forest regiment after this fire preparation, then not very well.

[TermNachTer]

Not the most effective use. However, on the other hand, considering how much of this stuff has been lying in warehouses since the times of the USSR, then why not.

[Clone]

After the third vacation, the son again went off to the “war”... the guns, he says, are old by age, but quite functional and will remain so for a long time, and the shells are domestic and from “unknown sponsors” - up to the very top.
Such "Frankensteins" are not born out of despair... An old and useless installation in the field was discovered, and a "heap" of ammunition with it, which cannot be used "on the ground", but you really want to... but it's a pity to just blow it up. So the trench "engineering thought" strains itself to combine the naval with the land. It will shoot off its own and be sent to the well-deserved... scrap.
Why not? Everything is for good, everything is for Victory!

[Chuk-i-gek]

I'm not a sailor. I am not familiar with this miracle, but I think that it is no more effective than the MLRS. Why cross the uncrossable? Or is everything so bad with the MLRS that you need to pull the sea wonders to land? I have only one explanation. Perhaps there is so much ammunition for this type in warehouses that there is nowhere to put it, and with ammunition for MLRS it will be worse. No other justification comes to mind.

[kill the fascist]

I think we have a lot of ammunition in our warehouses with a suitable expiration date. And perhaps they decided to dispose of the charges along with the banderoges in this way. Anything is better than killing fish.

[KLM77]

As for me, this is a demonstration of the lack of weapons!

[Mxabr]

Where are the Hurricanes, Grads, TOSs??? The dill was trashed, or???