Why was Archduke Franz Ferdinand killed?

55
Why was Archduke Franz Ferdinand killed?
Franz Ferdinand and his wife Sophia leaving the Sarajevo City Hall after reading a speech on June 28, 1914. Five minutes later they were killed


110 years ago, Archduke Franz Ferdinand, heir to the throne of the Austro-Hungarian Empire, was assassinated. This provocation marked the beginning of the July Crisis in Europe and the First World War.



On July 28, 1914, Austria-Hungary declared war on Serbia. Russia begins mobilization. On August 1 and 3, Germany declared war on Russia and France. On August 4, England enters the war. A pan-European war began.

Empire federalization project


Franz Ferdinand Carl Ludwig Joseph von Habsburg was the eldest son of Archduke Charles Ludwig (brother of the Austrian Emperor Franz Joseph) and Princess Maria Annunziata of the Two Sicilies. The elderly Emperor Franz Joseph I had ruled since 1848 and outlived his heirs. The only son and heir of Emperor Franz Joseph, Crown Prince Rudolf, died in 1889 at Mayerling Castle. According to the official version, he killed his beloved Baroness Maria Vechera and then shot himself.

However, there is a version that the heir to the throne of the Austro-Hungarian Empire became the victim of a conspiracy - it was a political murder disguised as suicide. After this mysterious murder, Archduke Karl Ludwig was considered the heir to the throne of the empire. In 1896, Karl Ludwig unsuccessfully drank water from the Jordan River, fell ill and died. The emperor's nephew, Franz Ferdinand, became the official heir.

Franz Ferdinand became the main hope of the decrepit Austro-Hungarian Empire. In 1906, the heir to the throne formulated the idea of ​​​​transforming Austria-Hungary, which could extend the life of the Habsburg Empire. Created with the help of a politician and lawyer of Romanian origin, Aurelius Popovich, the plan envisaged the federalization of the Austro-Hungarian Empire. The politician planned to create the United States of Greater Austria (German: Vereinigte Staaten von Groß-Österreich), which solved the problem of interethnic contradictions in the empire, where the Germans made up only about 25% of the population and formed the political, military, financial-industrial and scientific-cultural elite of the empire.

Another privileged nationality were the Hungarians, who achieved their rights through a long and persistent struggle that almost destroyed the Habsburg Empire. In 1867, the Austro-Hungarian Agreement was concluded, which transformed the Austrian Empire into Austria-Hungary, a constitutional dualist monarchy.

The other numerous peoples of the empire - Czechs, Croats, Slovaks, Slovenes, Serbs, Rusyns, Little Russians, Poles, Romanians and Italians - did not have the rights and opportunities that the German-Austrians and Hungarians had.

The “Patchwork Empire” was heading towards its collapse; only an external impulse was needed. Therefore, Vienna was very afraid of the Russians and the ideology of Pan-Slavism. The Austrians were afraid that Russia would receive the “inheritance” of another “sick man of Europe - Turkey”, would occupy a dominant position in the Balkans, leading the Orthodox and Slavic peoples. This will cause an uprising of the Slavic part of the Habsburg Empire and destroy it.

Therefore, the Viennese court in the 1877th and early 1878th centuries actively put spokes in the wheels of Russia. In particular, Austria's hostile position led Russia to defeat in the Crimean (Eastern) War. Also, Russia was unable to take advantage of the victory over Turkey in the war of XNUMX–XNUMX.

The Austrian question also became a prerequisite for the deterioration of relations between the German Empire and Russia. The British cleverly used these moments to pit the Germans and Russians against each other, breaking their traditional alliance since the wars with Napoleon.

Franz Ferdinand and Aurel Popovic wanted to continue the reform and establish a trialist federation (Austro-Hungarian-Slavia). This could breathe new life into the old empire. Popovich proposed creating about 15 autonomous equal regions (“states”) on a national-territorial basis.

In addition, they planned to establish several national enclaves (mostly German) in Bohemia, Slovakia, Hungary and Transylvania. Some large cities received autonomy within their “state”: Prague, Budapest, Lvov, Brasov and others.

Each large nationality received its own autonomy and all the conditions for the development of national culture, language and economy. So it was proposed to highlight:

– German Austria (Austria, South Tyrol, southern part of the Czech Republic);

– German Bohemia (northwestern part of the Czech Republic);

– German Moravia (north-eastern part of the Czech Republic), in these three areas the German language predominated;

– Czech Bohemia (central and southern Czech Republic);

– Slovak lands (Slovakia);

– Polish Western Galicia (Lesser Poland);

– Eastern Galicia (Rusyns);

– Hungary (Hungary, southern Slovakia, northern Vojvodina);

– Hungarian Székely lands (Székely region is the territory inhabited by Hungarians in Transylvania, modern Romania);

– Romanian Transylvania (Transylvania, Banat, Bukovina);

– Italian Trento (Trentino);

– Italian Trieste (Trieste, Gorica, western part of Istria);

– Slovenian Krajina (Kraina, southern Carinthia);

– Croatia (Croatia, Srem, Bay of Kotor);

– Serbo-Croatian Vojvodina (Vojvodina).

In this way, several problems were solved.

Firstly, the Habsburg Empire was preserved, it received a chance to renew itself and maintain its status as a great power. This was in the interests of the House of Habsburg.

Secondly, the Slavs received their own autonomous regions. In particular, this reconciled the Czech national movement. The Slavs benefited from the creation of Austro-Hungarian Slavia.

Thirdly, the nationalists had the opportunity to direct their energy in a peaceful direction, to the development of their autonomies, and not to the destruction of the Austro-Hungarian Empire.


Proposed map of the United States of Greater Austria and the main ethnic groups of Austria-Hungary

Opposition. Supporters of Greater Hungary


The idea of ​​radical reform of the empire also had strong opponents. Thus, the Hungarian elite was an uncompromising opponent of the triune state. The plan threatened the exceptional position of Hungary, which, thanks to the 1867 agreement, gained power over 1/2 of the territory of the Habsburg Empire. Thus, Transleithania (the lands located on the eastern side of the Leitha-Litava River) included the Kingdom of Hungary, including the Grand Duchy of Transylvania, the Kingdom of Croatia and Slavonia, and the free port city of Fiume.

The Hungarians emphasized the presence in Hungary of “a single political nation – the indivisible Hungarian” and actively pursued a policy of Magyarization. The Hungarian nobility did not want to lose lands and political influence in the empire. It got to the point that the Hungarian Prime Minister Count István Tisza declared: “If the heir to the throne decides to carry out his plan, I will raise a national Magyar revolution against him and wipe him off the face of the Earth.”

As a result, a version of the “Hungarian trace” even arose in the assassination attempt on the heir to the Austro-Hungarian throne.

In Vienna itself, Franz Ferdinand also had opponents.

The Archduke, like many other representatives of the Austrian nobility, did not like Russia and even more the Serbs. But the heir had enough common sense to understand the obvious: a preventive war with Serbia would lead to tragic consequences. The clash with Serbia led to a conflict with Russia, and this threatened serious consequences, including the collapse of the “patchwork empire.”

Franz Ferdinand was a realist and tried his best to avoid such a conflict. By this, he aroused the hatred of certain forces in the Habsburg Empire itself and powerful forces that were leading Europe to carnage and had already written off the Austro-Hungarian, German and Russian empires.


Franz Ferdinand Karl Ludwig Joseph von Oesterreich-Este (Archduke d'Este) (1863 - June 28, 1914) - Archduke of Austria, since 1896 heir to the throne of Austria-Hungary. General of the Cavalry (1899).

"Greater Serbia"


Another force that wanted to eliminate the Duke were Serbian nationalists. They wanted to destroy Austria-Hungary in order to build “Greater Serbia.” The Balkans during this period were (as at the present time) a real breeding ground for games of various intelligence services, secret organizations, terrorists, revolutionaries and outright bandits. Here, one after another, secret organizations arose - “Black Hand”, “Mlada Bosna”, “Svoboda” and others.

Thus, the assassination attempt on the Archduke was organized by the Serbian nationalist organization “Black Hand” (“Unity or Death”). Its branch in Bosnia, captured by the Austro-Hungarian Empire, was the Mlada Bosna organization, to which the murderer of the heir to the Austrian throne, high school student Gavrilo Princip, belonged.

The secret organization was created by the head of Serbian counterintelligence, Colonel Dragutin Dmitrievich, nicknamed “Apis” (the sacred bull in ancient Egyptian mythology). “Apis” was a patriot of Serbia, an enemy of pan-Germanism, and dreamed of building a “Greater Serbia,” and for this it was necessary to destroy Austria-Hungary.

Dmitrijevic, Tankosic and other organizers of the Black Hand were not only Serbian patriots, but also members of Masonic lodges. Among them was the Serbian minister L. Chupa, a prominent hierarch of the “freemasons”, who was associated with the Belgian and French masons. It was he who oversaw the organization. And the organization, after the coup of 1903, when the Serbian king Alexander Obrenovic and his wife Draga were killed, occupied leading positions in Serbia. Participants in the conspiracy entered the entourage of the new King Peter, occupying the highest military positions.

The organization's agitation was carried out from pan-Slavist, patriotic and Great Serbian positions. It was planned to achieve the main goal - the creation of “Greater Serbia” through war, with the obligatory participation of the Russian Empire.


Serbien muss sterb[i]en! (“Serbia must die!”). Cartoon shows Austria's hand destroying a Serbian terrorist

Preparing for world carnage


Thus, the Great Game was going on, the Serbs were seduced by the idea of ​​“Greater Serbia”. Russia was generally dragged into the war in secret; it did not need this war. Russia and the German world had no key contradictions; controversial issues could be resolved peacefully. The French and British skillfully dragged the Russians into the war, using them as “cannon fodder” against the Germans and as a “cash cow.”

The hawks in Austria-Hungary and Germany wanted war to resolve the issue with Serbia (dominance in the Balkans) and France (dominance in continental Europe). However, the Germans did not calculate all the consequences of the war, hoping for a blitzkrieg against France, and then a quick separate peace with Russia, which would lose its main ally in Europe. England, according to their calculations, should have remained on the sidelines.

In reality, all the benefits were received by the forces that stood behind England and the USA, the behind-the-scenes structures of that time (the Masonic lodges were part of them). The financial international (capital), whose family houses directed the policies of Britain, France and the USA. The crisis of capitalism caused by interest rates (living on debt, parasitism) was decided to be stopped by war. Along the way, fish in the troubled waters of war. Make money on military supplies, robbery and dismemberment of defeated powers.

The masters of the then collective West (France, England and the USA) planned to solve the most important strategic problems. To do this, it was necessary to eliminate competitors within the Western project - the German world, which still adhered to the outdated principles of the people's aristocratic society, the monarchy. They were going to dismember the German world, develop it, and include it in the common market. Also destroy the only civilization and power that did not submit to the West - Russian civilization, Russia. Then build your own “new world order” on the ruins of the Austro-Hungarian, German and Russian empires.


The car in which Franz Ferdinand and his wife were killed in Sarajevo. Militaryhistorical museum (Vienna)

Sarajevo murder


The Black Hand had enormous influence in Serbia and established branches in Bulgaria, Macedonia, and Bosnia. The King of Serbia, Peter I Karadjordjevic, and the head of government, Nikola Pasic, did not share the views of the radical organization, but could not control its activities. Everything was done so that Vienna would see in Belgrade the culprit in the death of the Archduke. Just before the assassination attempt, the terrorists were brought to the Serbian capital, where they underwent training at a shooting range in the royal park and were armed with Serbian pistols and bombs. In fact, a “Serbian trace” was created on purpose.

Apparently, there were also people in Vienna who benefited from the high-profile murder. The Serbian Prime Minister Pasic and the Russian Ambassador to Serbia Hartwig, through their agents, learned about the impending assassination attempt and notified the Vienna Court. However, the Austrian government did not cancel the Archduke's visit to Sarajevo and did not take adequate measures to strengthen security.

As a result, on June 28, 1914, terrorists were able to organize two assassination attempts at once. The first was unsuccessful - an explosive device thrown by Nedeljko Gabrinovic killed the driver and injured several people.

This assassination attempt, oddly enough, did not become a reason for strengthening the security of Franz Ferdinand or his immediate removal from Sarajevo. Moreover, the security of the heir to the throne that day was suspiciously curtailed. The terrorists had the opportunity to commit another assassination attempt.

From the Appel embankment, the Archduke's motorcade turned onto Franz Joseph Street, General Oskar Potiorek began to scold the driver for going the wrong way. The car (it was open) tried to turn around, but in a narrow place filled with townspeople it was difficult to do so. At this time, Gavrilo Princip jumped out of the crowd, raised his revolver and fired twice. His hands were shaking from fear, and he hit a woman - Sophia, the Archduke covered her with himself, and the third bullet killed Franz.

The crowd pinned down the killer and nearly tore him to pieces. Princip was saved by the police. Gavrilo Princip tried to poison himself, but the poison did not work (another oddity). For some reason, the wounded Franz and Sophia were taken not to the hospital, which was only a couple of blocks away, but to Potiorek’s residence, where, amid the lamentations of their entourage, they died of blood loss without receiving medical care.

The Mlado Bosna conspirators were convicted, adults were executed, and minors were sent to prison. In 1917, the terrorists Princip, Gabrilovich, Grabech, who were imprisoned in an Austrian prison, “themselves” died within a few weeks.

The leaders of the Black Hand were arrested and shot in 1917 on trumped-up charges (they allegedly wanted to open a front for the Austrian army). In 1918, the archives of the Sarajevo trial disappeared. In 1919, when Vienna wanted to return the Belgrade archives to Serbia (they were seized during the occupation of Serbia during the war), the ship that was carrying the documents disappeared on the Danube along with its crew. Thus, direct witnesses and documents disappeared.

This event led to a global catastrophe.

Obviously, the death of the heir to the throne of the Habsburg Empire and his wife could not lead to war.

But certain forces wanted war, and they got it. Everything was ready. Serbian patriots dreamed of a “Greater Serbia,” Vienna dreamed of defeating Serbia, Berlin dreamed of defeating France and redistributing colonies and world markets in its favor, France was eager to take revenge for its defeat in the war of 1870–1871. England needed to destroy Germany’s industrial might and its fleet, to preserve their colonial empire.

Only Russia did not want war, but it was skillfully used. The Russians were pushed into a massacre with the Germans. And London and Washington received all the benefits from the war.

Thus began a war that claimed millions of lives, destroyed millions of destinies, destroyed the Austro-Hungarian, German, Ottoman and Russian empires, greatly changed the political map of the world and even previous value systems.

Finance capital, England and the United States received all the benefits from the war. Financial and industrial clans made huge profits from the war, destroyed the aristocratic elites of the old empires, which were outdated and interfered with the construction of a new, “market-democratic” world order.

And most importantly, the main competitors of the Anglo-Saxon elite and large global capital - Russia and Germany - were pitted against each other and eliminated.
55 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +1
    4 July 2024 04: 48
    In my opinion, the engine of most wars is money, money and more money. Imposing one’s opinion on the world is carried out primarily for financial well-being, that is, money again.
    The empire on which the sun never set (England) began to yield to the development of the USA and Germany. And this jeopardized the position of the British in first place in the world and, of course, the finances of their country.

    Therefore, I would exclude the United States from the list of interested parties in the impending war. The USA, having enormous resources, would have overtaken Germany.
    Yes, they took advantage of the situation later. But they only took advantage...

    https://m.vk.com/topic-155684972_36289571
    1. +2
      4 July 2024 05: 03
      I would also cross France off the list of interested parties. The French did not behave like instigators, unlike the British...

      https://topwar.ru/183421-predposylki-vtoroj-mirovoj-vojny.html

      In the recent past, a similar situation arose.
      In the United States, back in 2014, they knew that before 2040 there would be a war with China, which at that time would become the only leader in the world. But they cannot win a war with China and Russia even with the entire EU.

      This means that these countries should have been broken up one by one. It is better to distance oneself from the EU, which was destined for the role of fighting the Russian Federation.
      After Rohatyn’s bear teaching, the Balts and Poles realized the role assigned to them as sacrificial animals and began to push Ukrainians into this role.
      The British even left the EU, trying to stay on the sidelines, but fighting with the wrong hands...

      1. 0
        4 July 2024 05: 09
        You can read partly about what is described above in the article
        https://topwar.ru/116089-bystryy-globalnyy-udar-chast-1.html
        1. +1
          4 July 2024 05: 26
          I would also add that the role of the Freemasons in the international sense is most likely extremely low.
          After the end of the Great War, the United States only wiped out Italy's debt. The British and French paid in full.
          And the Masons in England were one of the strongest lodges. It turns out that the Freemason brothers were not interested in helping their brothers in England
          1. 0
            4 July 2024 09: 00
            AsmyppoL(Alexey Ivanov)
            The main cause of the First World War was the crisis of capitalism. hi
            1. +2
              4 July 2024 10: 12
              I mean, it’s predation.. I don’t understand why Austria-Hungary is considered decrepit? According to their emperor? So, did the light fall like a wedge on Franz Ferdinand? The empire was on the rise. I mean the economy, industry. Multilingualism? So this applies many, including the Russian Empire..
  2. +4
    4 July 2024 05: 36
    Franz Ferdinand, a supporter of the Triune Monarchy, which also included the Slavs, was married to a Czech woman, which the ruling Habsburg dynasty did not like very much. And when he was killed, the German party made jokes about this, saying that he was a supporter of the Slavs, but the Slavs themselves killed
  3. +4
    4 July 2024 05: 57
    What's Hasek's story about Ferdinand?
    “They killed our Ferdinand,” his maid said to Schweik........ “Which Ferdinand, Mrs. Müllerov?” – Schweik asked, without ceasing to massage his knees. – I know two Ferdinands. One works for the pharmacist Prusha. Once, by mistake, he drank a bottle of hair growth liquid from him; and then there is Ferdinand Kokoschka, the one who collects dog shit. I don’t feel sorry for both of them at all. - No, Archduke Ferdinand, sir, was killed...
    1. +3
      4 July 2024 06: 29
      “They killed our Ferdinand,” his maid told Schweik.
      And his portrait was dirty by flies wink
  4. +2
    4 July 2024 06: 59
    Thirdly, the nationalists had the opportunity to direct their energy in a peaceful direction, to the development of their autonomies, and not to the destruction of the Austro-Hungarian Empire.

    no, the nationalists already received a legal base of autonomy for the destruction of Hungary.
  5. 0
    4 July 2024 07: 21
    An article with a hint of current events, especially highlighted phrases. Poor Nicholas II was dragged into the war, and he was also dragged into the war.
    All Nicholas II had to do was fulfill Germany's demand and stop mobilization. Only after the third refusal of the Russian ambassador Sazonov to cancel mobilization did the German ambassador declare war on Russia on behalf of Germany.
    1. 0
      4 July 2024 13: 56
      Abandon Serbia and completely lose face? This was completely unacceptable in the eyes of the society and politicians of that time.
      1. 0
        5 July 2024 12: 59
        Abandon Serbia and completely lose face? This was completely unacceptable in the eyes of the society and politicians of that time.

        Well, he saved face. But he lost his empire. wink
        1. +1
          5 July 2024 14: 02
          It's good to know the future. But in 1914 everyone was planning a quick defeat of the enemy and dinner in St. Petersburg or Berlin.
    2. -2
      5 July 2024 13: 05
      An article with a hint of current events, especially highlighted phrases. Poor Nicholas II was dragged into the war, and he was also dragged into the war.
      All Nicholas II had to do was fulfill Germany’s demand and stop mobilization. The German ambassador, only after the third refusal of the Russian ambassador Sazonov to cancel the mobilization, declared war on Russia on behalf of Germany.

      Irina, what are you saying, then the communists would not have come to power in Russia! wassat
      By the way, do you know that Mustafa Golubic, a member of Mlada Bosna and the Black Hand, later became a senior official of the Comintern?
      What can you tell us about the participation of communists in the assassination of Ferdinand? wink laughing
  6. +7
    4 July 2024 07: 36
    This fairy tale about poor Russians who have no brains and everyone uses them, is it not advisable to consider our ancestors idiots?
    1. +1
      4 July 2024 09: 57
      Yes, as if they were promoting a similar idea about their contemporaries; they say the Anglo-Saxons were drawn into the war with Ukraine. :((
  7. -2
    4 July 2024 08: 26
    Quote: AsmyppoL
    Therefore, I would exclude the United States from the list of interested parties in the impending war. The USA, having enormous resources, would have overtaken Germany.


    I wouldn't rule it out. If you have several competitors, the smartest thing to do is to pit them against each other. Enter the fight yourself at the most advantageous moment, when everyone else has smeared each other in bloody shit. Fortunately, the geographical location is very favorable for such a position.
    And why rely on the natural course of events if they can be significantly accelerated? War is just the best accelerator.
    1. +3
      4 July 2024 13: 58
      At that time, the United States adhered to isolationism and did not meddle in European affairs at all... However, I would not be surprised if an article comes out tomorrow in which it turns out that they organized WWI, as well as the Crimean and Napoleonic wars.
  8. 0
    4 July 2024 08: 29
    Quote: AsmyppoL
    It turns out that the Freemason brothers were not interested in helping their brothers in England


    Cain and Abel were also brothers. Why help your competitors?
  9. +2
    4 July 2024 08: 31
    If you want to fight, there will always be a reason.
  10. +1
    4 July 2024 08: 34
    It is unlikely that those who planned the murder had the resulting result in mind :)

    The author, as always, is trying to put an owl on the globe, based on the theory that we are always deceived, we didn’t want to, there are enemies around us, and we are always the losers.

    I'm afraid the author does not understand what this approach makes of us Russians. naive fools, only capable of serving their overseas masters, who, according to the author’s logic, are much smarter than us.

    You have to really despise your people to think like that.
  11. +3
    4 July 2024 09: 49
    "We were deceived again..." (C) Like Nicholas II in 1914... smile
  12. +3
    4 July 2024 10: 10
    I would argue about the benefits that England received from the war. In the end they had a lot of debts; it was expensive to have the fleet that they had and the land army.
    1. +3
      4 July 2024 10: 31
      The Americans benefited the most from the two world wars. And they occupied Russia during the Civil War not only to help the White Guards fight the Bolsheviks, but also to rob Russia. And now they benefit from what is happening in Ukraine.
      1. +1
        4 July 2024 10: 38
        The biggest beneficiaries of the two world wars were
        Bourgeois of all countries...
  13. 0
    4 July 2024 11: 53
    According to the official version, he killed his beloved Baroness Maria Vechera and then shot himself.

    According to the unofficial story, someone cut off his balls. By the way, I feel sorry for the girl. She seemed to be only 16 years old.
  14. -3
    4 July 2024 11: 57
    Quote: tatra
    Americans benefited the most from the two world wars

    Yes. In general, we can consider both the First and Second World Wars as episodes of one war, and this war was Anglo-American.
    England was first plunged into debt, then in Washington it lost its fleet, and at the beginning of World War II, its empire.
  15. +1
    4 July 2024 12: 06
    It would be useful to know what the population of the Austro-Hungarian Empire was in all of its ethnic groups in order to understand the percentage of different nationalities that existed within it. This was a period of various assassinations against various European royal families. For example, Princess "Sissi" was assassinated in Geneva by an Italian anarchist in 1898. And King Umberto I of Italy was assassinated by another Italian anarchist in 1900, but there are many other examples.
  16. 0
    4 July 2024 12: 07
    The author has a strange position.
    Austria-Hungary directly became the spring of the First World War.
    No, the war (albeit in a European format) was designed by the British. Their goal was to eliminate the competitor on the mainland and globalize the financial market.
    To a certain extent, they succeeded in pitting the main European powers against each other, but the war turned out to be not as simple as White Hall believed. We had to harness ourselves, and even get into debt with the damned Yankees. Well, losses, including in colonial terms.
    And they thought of excluding Russia from the list of winners by overthrowing the autocracy, and long before February 1917.
    1. 0
      5 July 2024 15: 05
      Stop putting an owl on the globe; it has long been clear to a normal person that the war was started by the Serb brothers, who believed that by dragging Russia into the conflict, they would solve their nationalist aspirations.
  17. +1
    4 July 2024 14: 02
    Everyone there was good. But AVI and Germany behaved most aggressively; they were the main instigators of WWI.
    1. 0
      4 July 2024 14: 42
      And the Kaiser (and Bethmann) at the beginning of 1914 understood what would happen by 1916 - 1917, when the military programs of Russia and France would be implemented. Well, and Great Britain remained the mistress of the seas (the Skagerrak was still ahead). So I was FORCED to act proactively, and was far from in the best shape.
      At the same time, the calculation was for the lightning defeat of France, and only then of Russia. If successful, this provided the absence of a front in Western Europe and a food and raw material base in Eastern Europe and Russia. And they looked askance at Austria in Berlin; even then they were thinking about a big Anschluss.
      It was in this adventuristic spirit that the Composer, concurrently the commander of a ship of the first rank and the Emperor of a unified German state, acted.
      1. +1
        4 July 2024 14: 58
        Yeah, “forced.” A typical excuse for aggressors. The Russian-French alliance was defensive in nature and posed a threat to Germany only if it wanted dominance on the continent. She actually wanted it. As for Britain, the Germans themselves made it hostile out of their own stupidity, starting a dreadnought race, building a fleet clearly aimed against England, and wasting the last chance that it would remain neutral when they invaded Belgium.
        1. 0
          4 July 2024 15: 06
          Everyone there was aggressors.
          About the UK and the global financial system - everything is right, France was thirsty for revenge. About the delusional projects of Franz Ferdinand and Pan-Slavism - in this article, and dear Russia continued to dream of the final solution to the Ottoman problem and the capture of the straits.
          So - live with wolves...
          But it is the all-European mess in the style of the Napoleonic wars that is Great Britain.
  18. +1
    4 July 2024 14: 08
    Quote: Kmon
    At that time, the United States adhered to isolationism and did not meddle in European affairs at all... However, I would not be surprised if an article comes out tomorrow in which it turns out that they organized WWI, as well as the Crimean and Napoleonic wars.


    Before the United States, the most “isolated” power was Great Britain.
    Splendid Isolation...
    Of course, the most important beneficiary in the First World War was also the United States.
    In 1913, the Federal Reserve System was organized, a year later - the First World War...
    War is a bonanza for the financial elite, oligarch bankers. It is during times of major wars that loans are taken out most of all, which means that entire countries can be put on a financial needle.

    And yes... do you know how much the Napoleonic wars enriched the Rothschild clan? Which gave loans to both sides, the British and the French.
    To work off Rothschild's loans, Napoleon went to Egypt. Actually, the goal was Palestine...
    Baron Rothschild stood at the origins of the Bank of England, the forerunner of the Federal Reserve System. Initially, the Fed was only a branch of the Bank of England. Both offices were staffed by the same people, whose amount of power is difficult to overestimate.
    1. +2
      4 July 2024 15: 05
      The Brilliant Lockdown is just a short period of 17 years during which Britain actually stuck to lockdown. As for loans, although formally the United States became the number one creditor after WWII, European countries were extremely reluctant to repay loans, and some, like Russia, suffered complete losses.

      For example, France received $3400 billion out of the $10,35 billion the US gave to its allies during or immediately after the war. France did not want to repay the loans, nor could it. The French quite rightly believed that their war costs (including non-monetary ones), which were quite significant, should also be taken into account. As a result, under the Mellon-Béranger agreement, ratified in France in 1929, the debt amount was reduced from $4230 to $1680 billion (including interest, reduced from 5 to 1,68), which must be paid
      eleven years. But France did not fulfill this agreement either. In total, just over $486 million was paid in the interwar period.

      And you have a logical error. If someone benefits from an event, this does not mean that he organized it. The Rothschilds, the Freemasons, the Fed running the world - this is a classic conspiracy theory. According to this logic, bankers have ruled everything since antiquity.
  19. +2
    4 July 2024 16: 32
    Franz Joseph I was something like today's Self-propelled Grandfather, and Austria by this time was in serious need of reforms, and its entry into the war pronounced its death sentence...
  20. +1
    4 July 2024 16: 55
    Quote: Victor Leningradets
    And they thought of excluding Russia from the list of winners by overthrowing the autocracy, and long before February 1917.

    And, by the way, losing the war against revolutions is far from the worst option in this situation.
    Let’s imagine that, yes, Russia has acquired the straits. Aaaand...
    There are several million kindly Turks around the straits. There is no land connection with the metropolis. More precisely, there is, but through Bulgaria and Romania.
    The Turks inevitably begin a war of liberation. The Englishwoman traditionally shits.
    It could have turned out to be such a mess that two revolutions with the Civil Revolution would seem like a cheerful picnic on a spring lawn.
    By the way, I was always interested in: how did the Russian tsars imagine owning the Straits?
    1. 0
      4 July 2024 18: 04
      Quote: Grossvater
      By the way, I was always interested in: how did the Russian tsars imagine owning the Straits?

      I always imagined this as taking possession of the northern territory adjacent to the straits. I don't know what it's called geographically. That is, Russia would own the northern coast, Türkiye - the southern. Russia, it seems, did not set itself the task of depriving Turkey of access to the straits (why?). It is important for her to ensure free access to the Mediterranean Sea.
      1. +1
        4 July 2024 22: 40
        So a free exit would not have worked. The minimum width of the Bosphorus is only 700 meters.
        1. 0
          5 July 2024 00: 28
          Quote from solar
          So a free exit would not have worked. The minimum width of the Bosphorus is only 700 meters.

          What, 350 meters is not enough for a free exit? Is someone eating too much?
          1. +1
            5 July 2024 00: 37
            Shot right through. This is hardly a “free exit”.
            1. 0
              5 July 2024 00: 51
              Quote from solar
              Shot right through. This is hardly a “free exit”.

              So you can shoot from both sides. It is not beneficial for either one or the other.
              1. +1
                5 July 2024 07: 51
                That’s why I write that it’s difficult to call this a free exit, since it depends on the enemy
                1. 0
                  5 July 2024 11: 12
                  Quote from solar
                  That’s why I write that it’s difficult to call this a free exit, since it depends on the enemy

                  It is also difficult to walk on the sea. There, too, everything depends on the enemy. Durnovo (who was a skeptic of the idea of ​​straits) wrote about this. A country with a strong navy (England?) can simply blockade the Aegean Sea.
  21. 0
    4 July 2024 16: 56
    Quote: Victor Leningradets
    Everyone there was aggressors.
    About the UK and the global financial system - everything is right, France was thirsty for revenge. About the delusional projects of Franz Ferdinand and Pan-Slavism - in this article, and dear Russia continued to dream of the final solution to the Ottoman problem and the capture of the straits.
    So - live with wolves...
    But it is the all-European mess in the style of the Napoleonic wars that is Great Britain.

    Yes!
  22. 0
    4 July 2024 17: 01
    Quote: Kmon
    starting the dreadnought race

    And failing to take advantage of the only real chance to influence the outcome of the war through large ships.
    I mean the period: the “race to the sea”, when the exit of the High Seas Fleet could prevent the landing of the English Expeditionary Force.
    By the way, in this case, Germany’s absolutely disadvantageous geographical position would work in the opposite direction. The Grand Fleet simply would not have had time to save the troop transports transporting the Corps to France from sinking.
    In the first, maneuverable period of the war, a delay of several days could be decisive.
    1. +1
      4 July 2024 17: 38
      Firstly, by that time a significant part of the British corps was already in France. Secondly, the FOM's entry into the sea would provoke the exit of the Grand Fleet, with a predictable result. Thirdly, during the run to the sea, only the 7th Division was transferred to France, and even if the Germans were lucky enough to sink it, it is unlikely that this would have fundamentally changed anything. The Germans had already lost when the plan to quickly capture France failed.
  23. 0
    4 July 2024 17: 24
    Quote: Grossvater
    And failing to take advantage of the only real chance to influence the outcome of the war through large ships.


    I think the role of the BEF in the decisive period is greatly exaggerated. Germany missed the chance to quickly finish off France after the "miracle on the Marne", in which only 6 British divisions participated, which did not play a decisive role. Germany did not use the High Seas Fleet because it considered its intervention excessive, as far as I understand the situation.

    IMHO, the younger Moltke did not want to sacrifice East Prussia temporarily, as a result Russia suffered a defeat, but the forces on the Western Front were less than necessary. Von Kluck may have made a mistake, distributing forces incorrectly and weakening the striking force aimed at Paris. He overestimated the ability of the Entente to act actively.

    Although this is all guesswork, of course.
  24. 0
    5 July 2024 09: 30
    Quote: Kmon
    As for loans, although formally the United States became the number one creditor after WWII, European countries were extremely reluctant to repay loans, and some, like Russia, suffered complete losses.


    The United States became a creditor during WWI, since the warring powers were in dire need of loans and supplies.
    What makes you think that the banking oligarchy was so worried about the return of loans? They were worried about something completely different - strengthening their power, including in the political sphere. They sought this and partially achieved it.
    Before WWII, the United States (more precisely, the real elite there) did not play a special role in European politics. Afterwards, they began to define it in many ways; even then the prototype of the European Union was conceived - the “United States of Europe”.

    Quote: Kmon
    And you have a logical error. If someone benefits from an event, this does not mean that he organized it. The Rothschilds, the Freemasons, the Fed running the world - this is a classic conspiracy theory. According to this logic, bankers have ruled everything since antiquity.


    Of course, of course, it was a coincidence. Once you got lucky, twice, three times... and practically the entire world economy ended up in the hands of several dozen power clans connected by family ties. Well, it happened by chance, yeah.
    All world history is a history of conspiracies and counter-plots. Real power is in the hands of those who do not follow events, do not wait for weather from the sea, but form the agenda.
    To have full power in the modern world, you need control over two important resources: financial and information. Whoever controls them is the “king of the hill”. And both are controlled by a very narrow group of people. Whether anyone likes it or not, this is how it is in the modern world.

    No. Bankers in antiquity did not own everything. Not everything could be bought back then. The title of an aristocrat, especially a monarch, and land holdings were not freely available for sale. In ancient Rome it was impossible to buy something that was the property of the entire state.
    But over time, things began to change. And, albeit not immediately, almost everything became a commodity, including government officials. They began to be bought and sold as a commodity and produced as a commodity, used as a commodity and a tool. This did not happen by itself, and it is not difficult to guess who benefited most from this state of affairs.
  25. 0
    5 July 2024 23: 10
    The article is completely crazy.
    Consider at least the following passages:
    they were armed with Serbian pistols

    These Brownings model 1910, made in Belgium under the numbers 19074, 19075, 19120 and 19126, became Serbian pistols for the author?! By the way, a little lower he writes, without any embarrassment, that "Gavrilo Princip, raised revolver and shot twice"

    Or this pearl:
    In 1917, the terrorists Princip, Gabrilovich, Grabech, who were imprisoned in an Austrian prison, “themselves” died within a few weeks.

    Nedeljko Gabrinovic (not Gabrilovich) died in January 1916; Trifko Grabech - in August 1916; Gavrilo Princip - in April 1918. This shows that the author does not know the material even at the Wikipedia level!

    And this is generally a “masterpiece”, and even in bold:
    The French and British skillfully dragged the Russians into the war, using them as “cannon fodder” against the Germans and as a “cash cow.”

    Excuse me, with whom did the war start? Who signed up for Serbia so as not to lose their prestige? France and England? Or is it still Russia? The Anglo-French could generally say: “because of such a trifle as Serbia, which is also involved in international terrorism, we will not fight.” And leave Russia alone with Germany.
  26. 0
    13 July 2024 14: 38
    This was a reckless act of terrorism. Yes, Princip has a grave in Terezin, where he died of tuberculosis in 1918. Nobody felt sorry for him. I wouldn’t even drag the Slavic peoples into this. At the first stage of the war, Lesser Serbia was able to defeat the 8th Army Corps of the Austrian Armida, but already in 1915, another Slavic nation, the Bulgarians, together with the Germans defeated Serbia, the war flared up, and the collapse of the Austro-Hungarian Empire still turns out to be a fundamental mistake. Thanks to one young Slavic student, the war began already in 1914. Wars would have started without killing, but much later. History probably cannot be assessed from today's point of view. am
  27. 0
    29 July 2024 09: 06
    The other numerous peoples of the empire - Czechs, Croats, Slovaks, Slovenes, Serbs, Rusyns, Little Russians, Poles, Romanians and Italians - did not have the rights and opportunities that the German-Austrians and Hungarians had.

    Does the author consider the Rusyns and Russian-Little Russians to be different peoples?
  28. 0
    15 October 2024 19: 33
    Quote: DenVB
    I always imagined it as taking over the northern territory adjacent to the straits. I don't know what it's called geographically.

    It's called Rumelia, Rumelia.