Ukrainian version of bullpap AK - Vepr assault rifle

22
As is known, after the collapse of the Soviet Union, each of the countries that were previously part of one great whole, proved its independence in all possible and impossible ways and, naturally, without creating its own types of manual firearms. weapons It didn’t work, because the possibility of providing our army with our weapons is the best proof that a country is independent. Actively proving its independence in this way, Ukraine, as it turned out, there are a lot of people in the country with original ideas concerning firearms, and quite a few scientific centers that can and want to pursue similar developments. We will not cite the example of truly original ideas in this article, such as, for example, Ascorius’s sniper rifle for arrow-shaped bullet cartridges, and learn about a more mundane type of weapon — the Vepr machine gun.

Created this sample machine in 2003 year, and created within the walls of the institution with a rather interesting name, namely the Scientific and Technical Center of Precision Engineering of the National Space Agency of Ukraine. It’s hard to imagine just this, what kind of machine gun it was, as at the time of its creation it was joked off, a weapon was created for conducting combat in space, however, in practice, the sample turned out to be completely not funny. Many compare this machine with the well-known Russian Thunderstorm, and in many ways this comparison is true. Just like the Thunderstorm, the Vepr machine gun is based on AK74, just like the Thunderstorm, the machine gun is designed as a bullpup, but the cartridges are not 9x39 and not 7,62x39, but 5,45x39, so even the comparison and the correct one, but the characteristics of the weapon are different . The main feature of the weapon is that it was possible to maintain maximum compatibility of parts and components with similar ones from the Kalashnikov assault rifle. This is quite important, provided that the AK from the Soviet Union left a huge number of warehouses, and to repair fully compatible weapons is much easier when each spring is studied far and wide and is in stock. The weight of the machine is equal to 3,45 kilogram without taking into account the cartridges, the length is only 702 millimeters, with a standard barrel length 415 millimeters, respectively, the initial speed of a bullet fired from this barrel is about 900 meters per second. The rate of fire left the old 600 shots per minute, which is convenient for those who are used to AK. Shops are fully compatible with AK74, 30 ammo capacity.

As a result of the fact that the 5,45х39 cartridge itself doesn’t create the biggest impulse when shooting and assembling the bullpup weapon, we managed to increase the accuracy of automatic fire, the machine itself became more manageable and everything would be fine if not for the few “buts” that are almost always present have weapons in the bullpup layout. Due to the new layout of the weapon, its balance has shifted, which makes retention for the shooter unusual. Ejection of spent cartridges, even when using the right hand as the main one, occurs too close to the shooter’s face, respectively, powder gases can irritate the mucous membranes, which is not at all a pleasant phenomenon. The change of the store in the weapon is completely unusual, the sighting line has decreased in its length, which negatively affected the accuracy, however, the sights of the machine gun work perfectly on their distance. In general and in general, the only serious disadvantage of this weapon can be considered only the release of spent cartridges close to the shooter’s face, the rest is a matter of habit.

In addition to the layout of the weapon, changes were made to the controls of the machine gun. Immediately catches the eye is that in the usual place there is no shutter handle. She carried far forward over the barrel of the weapon, can be rearranged from the right side to the left, and most importantly, it is stationary when firing. The fuse switch is a cross slider, placed above the trigger, which has a positive effect on the speed of bringing the weapon on alert and silence when switching.

Much more important point in the weapon was that the forearm, controls, etc. do not relate to the trunk, that is, in fact, the trunk itself could be called freely suspended, if not for the removal of powder gases. This decision has played a significant role in improving the accuracy of weapons. Separately note that due to the fact that the barrel is almost completely covered with plastic elements, this excludes its uneven cooling, although in my opinion such a problem is more inherent in machine guns rather than machine guns, however, if you don’t feel sorry for the weapon, don’t recount the cartridges ... almost all elements of the weapon are metal, the long-term contract of the arrow with the metal is completely excluded. This is achieved thanks to the plastic lining on the cover of the receiver, which is the focus for the cheek shooter, as well as the back plate on the butt, which, thanks to its sufficiently large area, helps to reduce the already not very high return when shooting.

The first assault rifles were equipped with sights taken from AK, but since the sighting line was reduced due to changes in the layout of the weapon, and the accuracy of the weapon as a whole increased, it was decided to replace the rear sight with a diopter. As well as the front sight, on the high rack is installed and the rear sight, the rack itself has the ability to fold. In addition to the standard sights, you can install the widest range of optical sights, night sights, collimator sights, including specially designed for this machine gun.

Initially, the weapon was developed taking into account the mounted grenade launcher, that is, we can speak not just about the machine gun, but about the rifle-grenade complex. Unfortunately, the GP-25 grenade launcher with a weapon in such a layout was incompatible, so it was necessary to develop its modification, especially for the Vepr machine gun. With the grenade launcher installed, the weapon is more stable when fired, its balance back becomes more familiar, although the weight of the machine gun increases. An interesting point is that with the grenade launcher installed, the automaton fuse plays the role of the grenade launcher fuse, which is quite reasonable. In addition, at the same time you can not push the trigger of the machine and the grenade launcher.

Thus, it turns out that the Vepr machine gun is another variation of the Kalashnikov machine gun in the bullpup layout. Naturally, many deny it, but even with the naked eye, without disassembling weapons, one can see the relationship of the two samples. The automatic machine received a gain in accuracy and accuracy of fire, its dimensions were reduced. Naturally, the bullpup layout contributed its negative qualities to the weapon, but they are quite tolerant. Many argue that the Vepr machine has fewer parts in comparison with the AK, which, unfortunately, is not possible to reliably verify. At the moment, the machine is in service with the army of Ukraine, along with the Kalashnikov machine gun, that's just to give this weapon in their hands is given far from everywhere, but only where compact dimensions are necessary with the full usefulness of the machine gun. The rest has to be content with Kalashnikov assault rifles, whatever one may say, and it is much cheaper to take the ready from the warehouse than to create an automaton again.

Ukrainian version of bullpap AK - Vepr assault rifle
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

22 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. avt
    +6
    22 February 2013 09: 43
    ,, Thus, it turns out that the Vepr automaton is another variation of the Kalashnikov assault rifle in the bullpup layout. Naturally, many deny this, but even with the naked eye, without disassembling the weapon, one can see the kinship of the two samples. "__________ I totally agree, the banal turning of Kalash into a bun without much design effort. Tula buns are much better thought out and look.
    1. +3
      22 February 2013 16: 49
      Why discuss what has died. "Boar" is a corpse!
      Mentioned here:
      http://gunmagazine.com.ua/index.php?id=143
      1. +2
        22 February 2013 20: 06
        ".......... Vepr assault rifle is based on AK74 .. "

        Our variations on this theme (if I am not mistaken, from the company "Zenith")


        1. DuraLexSedLex.
          0
          22 February 2013 21: 01
          On their site this is not (((((((((Drop the link please to those interested ...
          1. 0
            22 February 2013 21: 20
            Quote: DuraLexSedLex.
            On their site this is not (((((((((Drop the link please to those interested ...

            http://alfafilatov.livejournal.com/51826.html
            by the firm "Zenith"
            http://zenitco.ru/catalog/1717/
            http://zenitco.ru/
            1. DuraLexSedLex.
              0
              22 February 2013 22: 09
              Apparently I went blind, but there is not a single link to these products and alterations.
              1. 0
                22 February 2013 22: 28
                Quote: DuraLexSedLex.
                but there is not a single link specifically to these products and alterations.

                On the official website, I did not find any links to this alteration (bullpup), but the first link has a photo of the stand (yellow) with a bullpup, so in terms of elements everything is produced on "Zenith" (for example, if you type "handle RK- 3 "[or" forend B-10 "], then - a link to" Zenith "and its photo is present)
                1. 0
                  22 February 2013 23: 12
                  Something I don't eat this system ... As far as I understand, just AK is taken, a butt plate is installed instead of a butt, a pistol grip with a trigger mechanism "relatives" are removed and installed, designed to be carried forward + is weighted with new buns. Or am I wrong? what If everything is so, then I can’t say anything but “geniuses have not died out yet”, since in reality everything is ingeniously simple smile
                  1. 0
                    22 February 2013 23: 51
                    Quote: scrabler
                    ... As far as I understand, just AK is taken, a butt plate is installed instead of the butt, the pistol grip with a trigger mechanism "relatives" are removed and installed, designed to be carried forward + weighted with new buns .......

                    I understand the same.
  2. +11
    22 February 2013 09: 44
    Timofeevich created a machine gun for all time. Variations on the theme "Kalashnikov" will multiply like mushrooms. Because - better - impossible to create .....
  3. Fox
    +2
    22 February 2013 09: 50
    it would be interesting to poyuzat it. in the first Chechen comrade saw a THUNDER, with the stigma of 1985. but even he didn’t put it in ... PKM liked him more smile
  4. Akim
    +10
    22 February 2013 10: 26
    Don't touch the Boar. ABOUT the dead either good or nothing.
    1. +1
      22 February 2013 11: 09
      Akim,
      Yes, no one seems to touch - in fact, it turned out very nice, extremely rare for a bun-remake.
      Why the dead man? All that they have done - have they made a press release? wink
      1. Akim
        +9
        22 February 2013 11: 25
        Mikhado,
        How many have made them. Less than 10 pieces! He shamefully failed military trials. The sleeve flies suspiciously before my eyes. If you're left-handed, don't come close at all. The sound of the shutter frame hits my ears. Gunpowder burns blind after two stores and so on and so forth ...
        1. Algor73
          +1
          22 February 2013 17: 37
          Where does this information come from? Link please!
          1. Akim
            +2
            22 February 2013 18: 51
            Quote: Algor73
            Where does this information come from? Link please!

            Almost 10 years ago I did not sit at the monitor. And then they’re used to scooping all the information in Nete.
    2. Octavian avgust
      -3
      22 February 2013 16: 13
      And about the cruiser Ukraine, too, in the subject! laughing
  5. 0
    22 February 2013 10: 38
    The machine turned out to be quite good, a kind of analogue of our Thunderstorm, but having a number of advantages over it.
    1. avt
      +2
      22 February 2013 11: 12
      Quote: MRomanovich
      The machine turned out to be quite good, a kind of analogue of our Thunderstorm, but having a number of advantages over it.

      I do not agree, at least Storm has a new subsonic cartridge.
      1. +1
        22 February 2013 15: 06
        there is a thunderstorm for all three cartridges, choose which one you want
    2. Hon
      -2
      22 February 2013 12: 02
      Quote: MRomanovich
      The machine turned out to be quite good, a kind of analogue of our Thunderstorm, but having a number of advantages over it.

      Bullshit turned out
    3. 0
      22 February 2013 12: 36
      MRomanovich, and which ones?
  6. nnkfrschk
    0
    22 February 2013 11: 19
    The bullpup layout has its drawbacks - quick magazine changes are not possible.
    1. Misantrop
      +10
      22 February 2013 11: 38
      Quote: nnkfrschk
      The bullpup layout has its drawbacks - quick magazine changes are not possible.

      But incomplete disassembly is easier to produce. The border guard officer showed. If, holding it vertically by the barrel, sharply hit the butt on the table, incomplete disassembly occurs automatically ... wassat
      1. Akim
        +3
        22 February 2013 11: 42
        Quote: Misantrop
        If, holding it vertically by the barrel, sharply hit the butt on the table, incomplete disassembly occurs automatically

        But to shoot with such "Lego" is dumb.
        1. Misantrop
          +1
          22 February 2013 12: 07
          Quote: Akim
          But to shoot with such "Lego" is dumb.

          That's why they are farther than weapons and do not appear laughing
  7. +1
    22 February 2013 11: 48
    like Thunderstorm, the Vepr assault rifle was created on the basis of AK74, just like Thunderstorm, the assault rifle is made in bullpup layout, but the cartridges are not 9x39 and not 7,62x39, but 5,45x39, so at least the comparison is correct, but the characteristics weapons are different.

    So the Thunderstorm seems to be under 5,45 and 5,56.
    1. +1
      22 February 2013 12: 51
      As far as I remember, Thunder-4 under 9х39 and Thunder-1 under 7,62х39
  8. 0
    22 February 2013 12: 26
    The idea is good. The length of the weapon is key when maintaining a database on equipment.
  9. Akim
    +4
    22 February 2013 12: 36
    I would not say that the idea of ​​a bulpup based on Kalash in Ukraine is dead, but it will not be "Vepr"
    1. 0
      22 February 2013 13: 31
      About 5,56x45 says - hints? (4: 01)
      1. Akim
        +2
        22 February 2013 13: 35
        Quote: scrabler
        About 5,56x45 says - hints?

        Then Russia with the AK-102 has long been in NATO! Sleep well. wassat
        1. -1
          22 February 2013 13: 39
          Well, at least they don’t talk about the prospects of the cartridge in the country request
          1. Akim
            0
            22 February 2013 13: 41
            Quote: scrabler
            Well, at least they don’t talk about the prospects of the cartridge in the country

            Why do not they say. In Ukraine, the MZ-15 bicycling assault rifle is produced.
            1. -1
              22 February 2013 14: 28
              I mean that they do not plan to use weapons for this cartridge, and those samples that are under 5,56 are mainly for export. Thank you for the tip on the MZ, I did not know about such options for weapons smile
              1. Akim
                +1
                22 February 2013 14: 44
                Quote: scrabler

                I mean, they don’t plan to use weapons under this cartridge

                Why change the awl for soap? And the MZ-15 allows the use of cartridges 5,45x39, 5,56x45, 6,5x38 6,8x38, 7,62x39. Change the trunk and that's it. Even the bolt group is unchanged.
                1. 0
                  22 February 2013 14: 46
                  So I ask why the prospects for this ammunition appeared.
                  1. Akim
                    +1
                    22 February 2013 14: 49
                    Quote: scrabler
                    from and I ask why the prospects for this munition appeared.

                    Which one?
                    1. -1
                      22 February 2013 15: 10
                      The video you posted is above 4 minutes 1 seconds.
                      1. Akim
                        +1
                        22 February 2013 15: 39
                        Quote: scrabler
                        The video you posted is above 4 minutes 1 seconds.

                        These are prototypes, and the MZ-15 is serial. This is a completely different rifle. As for caliber. The Armed Forces of Ukraine are two sub-machine guns of 5,45 and 7,62x39. The first is the main one. The transition to other calibers is not yet provided.
            2. 0
              22 February 2013 21: 20
              Nothing is produced in Ukraine. The release of 10-20 prototypes is not taken into account.
    2. 0
      22 February 2013 20: 06
      Hmm ... PBS almost as long as the "paddle" itself is definitely a test.
      True, they were somewhat confused by statements about a fundamentally new scheme (7:47) of the muffler. So what can you come up with new? Separators were used, expansion chambers - well this is generally a classic, all kinds of fillers (metal shavings and in general) too ... Well, okay, you can use materials more advanced than steel to use: composites, ceramics ... But - fundamentally new?
      1. 0
        22 February 2013 20: 25
        Quote: Raphael_83
        But - fundamentally new?

        As I understand it, a standard cartridge is used with this muffler. That is - with a supersonic bullet.
  10. gladiatorakz
    +4
    22 February 2013 12: 42
    Great machine. And Kalash and Boar option. I would just add a telescopic butt. And the eyes away from the ejected cartridges and weight distribution can be adjusted. And so fire! Under the jacket and off. He unbuttoned it - took it out - to the balaclava, put it on his glasses. Done.
    One thing I did not understand why the author did the first paragraph? I attached a certain "proof" of independence to the description of the machine. Fuck this policy everywhere to shove? If this modification was made in Russia, then what would they prove?
    1. +3
      22 February 2013 12: 53
      They would prove that there used to be Gunsmiths, and now only designers. wink But seriously, I think that using a country’s own weapons is the best indicator of its independence and success, with the proviso that weapons and military equipment are not copied, but developed and produced domestically.
      1. gladiatorakz
        +1
        22 February 2013 19: 48
        Quote: scrabler
        But seriously, I think that using a country’s own weapons is the best indicator of its independence and success, with the proviso that weapons and military equipment are not copied, but developed and produced domestically.

        You can of course accept such an indicator of independence. We have developed a lot of weapons together! I hope that the time will come and we will work together again. Both at construction sites and on the military field.
        1. +2
          22 February 2013 20: 12
          (Belarus + Russia + Ukraine + Czech Republic) - officials = our global arms market)))
          1. 0
            22 February 2013 21: 26
            And he is already ours. Only we are not together. recourse
  11. 0
    22 February 2013 13: 21
    Another "Padelka" of the level of the Finnish valmet on the bunkin theme. Not bad and not good. Let's see how the troops go ...
    1. 0
      22 February 2013 20: 14
      But I could not understand that this "stub" reminds me of, well, just the same M-82. They were really released maybe more, but with a similar final result.
    2. 0
      22 February 2013 21: 29
      The troops will not go. In the best case, some trunks will not be exported, but in the worst case they will be converted to a civilian version and sold to the public. Yes
  12. +1
    22 February 2013 18: 32
    One big mistake of the majority of authors and commentators of small arms articles (and not only) is whether the weapon was made on the basis of (for example, the AK-74) or made using components and assemblies (AK-74).
    1st case is "Boar".
    2nd "Thunderstorm" and A91.
    And in general, the arrangement of small arms according to the "blpup" scheme is underestimated and in this regard, one cannot but rejoice in the progress of our Slav brothers.
  13. Algor73
    +3
    22 February 2013 18: 55
    And in my opinion, a good machine. But to argue whether he is good or bad - we need tests, comparative ones. But where to get such an impu? Hey all-knowing Akim, share!
    1. Akim
      +4
      22 February 2013 19: 15
      Quote: Algor73
      Hey all-knowing Akim, share!

      You have to serve 10 years in the army to have a "soldier's mail".
      1. +1
        22 February 2013 21: 31
        In a few months there will be just 10 years. But in the Ukrainian army no one heard of this miracle.
        1. Akim
          +1
          22 February 2013 21: 58
          I ran up to 2006. And about the drowned first three (BTR-3) did not hear?
  14. 0
    22 February 2013 20: 08
    And in my opinion, the Boar was simply screwed up on purpose, it has its own shortcomings, but they are either inherent in all bullpups, or are quite easily eliminated. They leaked their sample so that others would come in its place under a license, for which someone received a considerable amount of money. The only question is whether the army is good for this, it seems to me that the new devices, as well as the Boar, will receive minimal distribution and will be a rare species. And how many such samples are still buried which are either very little known or nothing is known at all ...
  15. +2
    22 February 2013 20: 23
    Certainly a worthy example, plus article!
  16. 0
    22 February 2013 20: 27
    Quote: datur
    Mromanovich, and which ones?

    Of those visible from the outside, a longer sighting line, a separate trigger for the grenade launcher, a more convenient position of the shutter handle, a plastic emphasis for the cheek, a convenient fuse can be distinguished.
  17. 0
    22 February 2013 21: 06
    http://waronline.org/fora/index.php?attachments/420237_10151313536131936_7701993

    49_n-jpg.3259 /.
    A well-made bun is a pretty decent weapon. Although I will tell you the truth I managed to hold it a couple of times and asked the conscripts for several minutes. But the devil is hellish, already terrible.
  18. +1
    22 February 2013 21: 31
    In my lifetime, I have seen a lot of all kinds of alterations of the AK assault rifle.
    But, as an advanced, I dare say, user)) AK, all these alterations are garbage.
  19. +2
    22 February 2013 23: 59
    And now the question is - what the hell? What the fuck is all this bummer? What can a Boar do that a simple AK can't? What such golden properties does this miracle man have to make such a garden? As I understand it, the Vepr has no special advantages, except for consolation of the "national piha".
    But it has a full yard of hemorrhoids ... here you have both ejection of cartridges and exhaust in the face and reduced (definitely!) Reliability and specifically the rear balance, which is inherent in all bullpup systems ... in short, the verdict is that - the game is not worth the candle.
  20. +1
    23 February 2013 01: 39
    Quote: akm8226
    What can a Boar do that a simple AK cannot?

    Of the tangible, only one thing is that it is relatively free to squeeze into the opening, alas, the advantages end there. There are of course little things, such as a convenient fuse, but this is not so significant. There are many more shortcomings, from which they probably will not be equipped with it.
    1. 0
      12 October 2013 23: 24
      If you think about it, even Ksyushka will furnish the Boar - compactness, lightness and reliability are more than on the level. And besides there is also the classic layout, which does not have all the disadvantages of the Boar
  21. +1
    23 February 2013 05: 44
    Like bullpups are doing to make the sample more compact and lighter. Compactness for tankers, easier for march-throws, But in return often get other disadvantages. NOT?
    1. -1
      23 February 2013 10: 23
      Excuse me, where are you with such a fool in a tank? There is no place there, every millimeter counts ... for tankers there are Cedar-type PPs and others that are portable, not like Boar ... Another nuance is the aiming bar is too close to the eye. This clearly worsens the conditions of aiming. That is why they put a diopter or a collimator.
      1. Akim
        +1
        23 February 2013 11: 02
        Quote: akm8226
        for tankers there is a Cedar type software

        I am not a fan of "Boar" either, but you should not mix a full-fledged machine gun with a submachine gun. Besides, "Kedr" is a Russian model and is unlikely to get widespread in Ukraine. True, there are samples of their own and some have successfully passed the tests.
        1. 0
          24 February 2013 00: 10
          I don’t understand, but what - is Ukraine going to fight with someone?
          Is this a new joke?
          1. Akim
            0
            24 February 2013 00: 21
            Quote: akm8226
            I don’t understand, but what - is Ukraine going to fight with someone?

            To be honest, I did not enter the question.
            1. +1
              24 February 2013 00: 26
              Well, in the sense, why should Ukraine even develop weapons? Who is she going to fight with? Sell ​​this miracle ... are you laughing? In the world there are several bullpup systems, worked out and brought to mind ... the very same Steir AUG for example ...
              1. Akim
                0
                24 February 2013 00: 35
                Quote: akm8226
                Well, in the sense, why should Ukraine even develop weapons? Who is she going to fight with?

                The country always has a conditional opponent. And as for small arms made in Austria, they do not use the army anywhere except Austria. The AK-74 itself is out of date in its current form. Need a new machine.
                1. 0
                  24 February 2013 00: 39
                  Excuse me - who exactly needs a new machine? Have you served in the "army" of Ukraine for a long time? There are absolutely no problems except how to change the outdated AK-74 to the Vepr?
                  But....
                  1. Akim
                    +1
                    24 February 2013 00: 52
                    Quote: akm8226
                    How to change the outdated AK-74 to Vepr?

                    Who said that "Vepr" will be in the army of Ukraine ?. This project in that version has sunk into oblivion. And what about rearmament. We still have a lot of PCA in our warehouses. Why do we need a new machine?
                    PS And the word served not correctly bracketed.
    2. -1
      23 February 2013 10: 36
      Quote: BITL_DJUS
      It seems bullpups are doing to make the sample more compact and lighter ....

      I think not so.
      A bullpup with a full barrel length is not lighter and no shorter than the same AK-74 with a butt folded to the side. So carry or keep in the car the same way. Differ in usability. If the weapon is used in a limited space (urban areas), then bullpup is more convenient, if the field, then the classic is more convenient.
  22. insomnia
    0
    23 February 2013 15: 13
    We know that ho..ly love to experiment with weapons. Another thing is whether they need these alterations?
    The Ukrainian military industry is now mainly export-oriented. But the global market is now split between the US and Israel and, to a lesser extent, between Russia, China and Europe. And with this "gun" they have no prospects ...
    On the other hand, they can do it for their own, but here I heard somewhere that they do Tavor under license. So, the local market is also not an option.
  23. a boat
    -1
    23 February 2013 21: 40
    as it was written above, that we ourselves were to blame for the next sample! it’s not the first one, and not the last one! And in more detail, does anyone have info about the mz-74 lighthouse is a very interesting machine!
    1. Akim
      0
      24 February 2013 00: 16
      5,45 and 5,56 mm barrels and bolt group for bicaliber rifle.
  24. georg737577
    +1
    25 February 2013 04: 15
    How long can you "reinvent" Kalashnikov? But go and the institute got a lot of money - of course, "the development of a unique domestic sample, etc. ...". Awards, certificates. show-off ... I will not be surprised if our PMs begin to convert into bullpup ... And then back .. And everything is "in business"!
    1. Akim
      +1
      25 February 2013 07: 28
      Quote: georg737577
      But loot and go get sickly institute

      Here I agree. And the amount of work done as a cadet - a rabbi for a diploma.
  25. Mius
    0
    17 November 2014 00: 20
    Here's another topic: Such a sebededelkin from AKM.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"