The use of FAB-3000 aerial bombs with UMPC modules began

42
The use of FAB-3000 aerial bombs with UMPC modules began
The leadership of the Ministry of Defense inspects the production of large-caliber bombs, February 2024. Photo by the Russian Ministry of Defense


Several months ago it became known that the Russian defense industry was resuming the production of high-explosive aviation FAB-3000 bombs. Then it was connected with plans to use such weapons as part of the ongoing Special Operation. And the forecasts were justified: recently our front-line aviation began using three-ton bombs with universal planning and correction modules to attack enemy targets.



Return to the arsenals


On March 21, 2024, Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu, accompanied by other department heads, visited one of the enterprises of the military-industrial complex in the Nizhny Novgorod region. The name of the organization was not mentioned in official communications.

The minister was shown the production of modern ammunition and told about the achievements of the enterprise. The plant specializes in the production of various types of ammunition, including those intended for front-line aviation. Recently, the company has been increasing its production rates.

In addition, in February of this year, the plant resumed production of FAB-3000 aerial bombs. The Defense Ministry delegation inspected the production line where ammunition casings and finished products are manufactured. Bombs of the 1954 modification with a shortened body were captured in the frame.


The first known episode of the use of FAB-3000 with UMPC was the destruction of buildings in the village. Liptsy. Still from video from Telegram / Fighterbomber

It immediately became clear that the production of new aerial bombs was being carried out to equip units participating in a special military operation. Therefore, the use of new ammunition could be expected in the coming weeks or months.

Events and experience of recent months have led to the assumption of the possible use of three-ton FAB-3000 aerial bombs with universal planning and correction modules (UMPC).

The Ministry of Defense did not disclose its plans for the production and use of three-ton bombs. Versions about the imminent appearance of these ammunition in the combat zone and their use with UMPC have been neither confirmed nor refuted.

On June 20, a video appeared for the first time on specialized resources, which allegedly demonstrated the use of a FAB-3000 aerial bomb with a UMPC by an aircraft of an unspecified type. The video was taken from a reconnaissance drone, which probably also provided target designation. The target of the attack was buildings in the village of Liptsy, Kharkov region, which the enemy used to house manpower.

The bomb flew along a steep trajectory and exploded on the site between the buildings. As a result of the explosion, several one-story buildings were completely destroyed and a neighboring building was seriously damaged. The exact results of the strike are unknown, but it is obvious that in the destroyed buildings manpower and equipment were destroyed, and in the damaged building they at least suffered great damage.


Impact results. The multi-storey building is damaged, two buildings on the right are completely destroyed. Still from video from Telegram / Fighterbomber

Literally the next day after the first strike using the FAB-3000 with the UMPC, another video was published showing an attack on an enemy target in Liptsy.

On June 23, two new videos appeared showing strikes on targets in the same area. And on June 24, they showed that an aerial bomb hit the village of Volchansk, which is also located in the Kharkov direction.

In all cases, the result of the bomb was the same: some buildings were demolished, others were destroyed. There were also casualties among enemy personnel and material was destroyed.

To date, five videos have been published on specialized resources showing FAB-3000 attacks on Ukrainian targets. However, it can be assumed that not all results of objective control become public. The actual consumption of bombs may be significantly higher than what is known.

Obviously, the use of such weapons will continue as long as the enemy has suitable targets.

At a new stage


History The creation of the high-explosive aerial bomb FAB-3000 began in the forties of the last century. At that time, a line of general-purpose free-fall bombs was developed for bomber aviation.

In 1954, these bombs were modernized to meet the requirements of new combat aircraft. The result of this work was the FAB-3000 M54 product, which is still in service.

It is interesting that the three-ton bombs, unlike other products in the line, were used for a long time only at training grounds. The FAB-3000 was first used in real combat during the war in Afghanistan. After that, there was a long break. And only in 2022, such bombs were used in combat again - during the battles for the industrial development of the city of Mariupol. FAB-3000 were used in the original free-fall version, and the carriers were Tu-22M3 bombers.


The second blow in Liptsy. A flying bomb is visible. Still from video from Telegram / “The Inside Out”

Currently, a new page is opening in the history of FAB-3000. This old ammunition has received additional attachments that allow it to be turned into a precision weapon with an increased release range.

In this form, aerial bombs are actively used as part of a Special Military Operation to destroy various enemy targets. They clearly demonstrate their potential.

Means of destruction


FAB-3000 model 1954 is an aerial bomb designed to destroy targets on the ground. Its length is about 3,3 meters, and its case diameter is 820 millimeters. The actual mass of the bomb is 3067 kilograms.

The FAB-3000 body consists of several conical surfaces. The head fairing has a massive anti-ricochet ring. The tail unit is represented by several planes connected by a ring.

The bomb carries an explosive charge weighing approx. 1,4 t. The use of three fuses is provided, the nests of which are located in the bow and tail parts of the body. Detonation of the charge leads to the fragmentation of the body into fragments and their scattering across the area; a shock wave is also formed. The impact of waves and fragments is guaranteed to kill personnel within a radius of 35-40 m, and also destroy buildings or cause damage to armored vehicles. At a distance of up to 150-160 m, the shock wave can cause serious injuries. The fragments of the hull are scattered hundreds of meters.

The Universal Planning and Correction Module (UMPC) is a device for converting a free-falling bomb into a guided munition. UMPC is available in several versions for bombs of different calibers.

The UMPC has an oblong body, inside of which there is electronics, and outside there is a folding wing and tail unit. The device is attached to the bomb using clamps. In some cases, the head of the bomb is covered with an additional fairing.

Modules for bombs of different calibers differ in size and structural strength. For example, the largest modification of the UMPC is used together with the FAB-3000. Based on the available materials, we can conclude that this module can have a length of up to 2,5-3 meters and a wingspan of about 4-5 meters.


The result of the blow. Still from video from Telegram / “The Inside Out”

UMPC (universal planning and correction module) is equipped with a noise-resistant Comet satellite navigation device and a SMART navigation controller. Before resetting, the module electronics receive target coordinates from the carrier aircraft. During the flight, it tracks its location and determines the flight path, if necessary, issuing commands to the steering gears.

Circular Probable Deviation (CPD) of no more than a few meters was reported. The gliding flight range is unknown, but according to various estimates it can reach at least 40–50 kilometers.

It is not yet known exactly which aircraft carry the FAB-3000 with UMPC. The original free-fall bomb can be used by long-range bombers Tu-95MS and Tu-22M3, as well as front-line Su-34. However, the ammunition capacity of the latter is limited by its overall carrying capacity and the capabilities of individual suspension points. It is quite possible that all of these bombers can also carry a bomb with a UMPC, but the presence of the module affects the specification of the suspension and application.

Obvious advantages


A high-explosive aerial bomb of 3000 kg caliber with a planning and correction module (FAB-3000 with UMPC) has a number of important advantages and has already taken its place in the arsenal of our military aviation.

It has recently been used in a war zone, and its use cannot be expected to stop any time soon. FAB-3000 with UMPC will be used as long as there are appropriate targets on the enemy’s front line and in the rear.

The idea of ​​equipping aerial bombs with UMPC modules also has economic advantages. The glide munition is created on the basis of a finished bomb and is equipped with a correction module of a simpler design, which reduces the cost of production. This allows for mass production of guided weapons at limited costs.


The fifth known use of FAB-3000 with UMPC. The goal was to locate the enemy in the village. Volchansk. Still from video from Telegram / “The Inside Out”

The FAB-3000 has unique combat characteristics and is capable of reliably hitting a variety of objects, manpower, etc. At the same time, the UMPC module increases the flight range and also increases the accuracy of the hit. As a result, the bomb uses its potential more fully, is more likely to hit its target and causes more damage.

Development continues


Last spring, the Russian Military Space Forces (VKS) received and began to use high-explosive aerial bombs with universal planning and correction modules (UMPC). First, gliding bombs of 250 and 500 kg calibers came into service, and then heavier ammunition appeared.

To date, a whole family of weapons has been formed, including bombs with a caliber of up to 1500 and 3000 kg.

Thus, Russian strike aircraft have a wide range of different weapons to combat various targets. The range of weapons is constantly expanding, providing bombers with new combat capabilities. The appearance of the FAB-3000 with UMPC in service makes it possible to more effectively carry out operations to demilitarize Ukraine.
42 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +1
    1 July 2024 06: 02
    The author did not mention another advantage of such bombs. If they are used en masse, they can seriously overload the air defense of Ukraine, i.e. from the use of FAB you can get a double benefit, the effect of a landmine and the load on air defense. In addition, the FAB-3000 is capable of penetrating fortified points at great depths
    1. +1
      1 July 2024 06: 18
      “In addition, the FAB-3000 is capable of penetrating fortified points at great depths.” No they can't. The heavier it is, the shorter the range of independent flight. Fab F500 or Fab 1500 with more accurate UMPCs would be more respectful. But there is something. But the haters will be pleased with the cap.
      1. +6
        1 July 2024 08: 11
        “In addition, the FAB-3000 is capable of penetrating fortified points at great depths.” No they can't. The heavier it is, the shorter the range of independent flight.
        What does the range of a bomb have to do with its ability to penetrate fortifications?
        1. +1
          1 July 2024 09: 10
          “at great depth” means the great depth of the enemy’s defense. The short distance is measured in distances from the LBS to the enemy’s last line of defense. Not the depth in the ground.
          1. +1
            1 July 2024 16: 41
            Quote: puteovii
            “at great depth” means the great depth of the enemy’s defense. The short distance is measured in distances from the LBS to the enemy’s last line of defense. Not the depth in the ground.

            No, what we mean is the depth of the damage in the ground. Otherwise they would have written “at a long range in the depths of the enemy’s defense.”
          2. -2
            2 July 2024 16: 25
            You shouldn't write nonsense! The flight range, on the contrary, is greater the heavier the ammunition, provided it is dropped from the same height and speed! Even the controls are easier! Less influence of atmospheric movement. Mechanization is more difficult. The choice of media is more difficult. Yes, 5 FAB500 are more impressive than 1 FAB3000 for not very fortified objects, but the price, taking into account the UMPC, differs by 3-4 times...
            1. 0
              19 August 2024 10: 19
              Learn physics. Back in the 16th century, Galileo, using the Leaning Tower of Pisa, proved that the speed of a falling body does not depend on its weight.
              In our case, the flight range depends on the flight altitude, speed and aerodynamic qualities of the module.
              The first two points depend on the capabilities of the carrier.
              A suspended toy does not improve the flight performance of the aircraft.
              1. 0
                15 September 2024 09: 19
                Again nonsense... You are a complete... humanities student! It does not depend on it in a vacuum! And we are in the atmosphere! And gliding in a vacuum is impossible! And we are considering a gliding object! And the heavier it is, the greater the initial speed and altitude we give it - the further it will fly! And since the parameters of the atmosphere do not depend on us, then the heavier the object, the less influence fluctuations have on it, which interfere with precise following of the course (guidance). There is such a concept - "aerodynamic quality of a glider" - this is the ratio of altitude to flight range (in the ideal case!). For example, for a good glider - it is about 20, i.e. a glider launched from 10 km will fly 200 (launched with zero speed, there are no air flows, it is clear that this is purely theoretical!).
                1. 0
                  15 September 2024 10: 26
                  Shark, it's a vacuum in your head, and also weightlessness.) )
                  In my post above, I already indicated that the flight range depends on the energy that the body has and on the aerodynamic properties of the aircraft.
                  The energy of the body depends on the height and speed of the object. It's a pity that formulas cannot be written here.
                  It is logical that the higher these indicators are, the further the object will fly.
                  Where do you fail to understand the basics of physics? You don't understand that the heavier the object, the larger its area, the greater the air resistance, and therefore it won't fly any faster.
                  Argument: what will fall to the ground faster - a kilogram of brick or a kilogram of cotton wool?
                  All planning blocks are made of the same material.

                  About fluctuations. The aerodynamic quality of the gliding block wing is greater, the greater the lift and the less the drag. The lift and drag of the wing depend on the geometric characteristics of the gliding block wing. This is not related to weight.

                  I can give you a head start in physics.)
        2. 0
          1 July 2024 09: 28
          Quote: Dutchman Michel
          What does the range of a bomb have to do with its ability to penetrate fortifications?

          The opposite. The farther the bomb glides, the lower its vertical speed will be at the moment it falls.
          1. 0
            2 July 2024 16: 49
            Do you really think so?! A bomb, even a FAB500, is not a feather, and during glide its speed changes little, yes, it slows down a little compared to the moment of takeoff (the plane is clearly flying faster). And the heavier the ammunition, the slower it slows down. It’s even difficult to say for sure about the vertical speed - the FAB3000 will gain sufficient speed even from 200-300 meters; again, the design of the FAB bombs itself does not imply deep penetration; for this purpose, thin, elongated ammunition is made, for example from old gun barrels.
            1. 0
              2 July 2024 16: 58
              Quote: sH, arK
              Do you really think so?!

              Yes.
              1. 0
                2 July 2024 17: 01
                Then maybe you should start with a school physics course?
                1. 0
                  2 July 2024 17: 26
                  Quote: sH, arK
                  Then maybe you should start with a school physics course?

                  Try these tips out for yourself.
                  1. 0
                    2 July 2024 17: 33
                    Already. 40 years ago at school, 35 years ago at the institute, and then working at a military research institute for almost 10 more years! And try it!
                    1. -1
                      2 July 2024 17: 41
                      Quote: sH, arK
                      Already. 40 years ago at school, 35 years ago at the institute, and then working at a military research institute for almost 10 more years! And try it!

                      It may not be difficult for you to calculate what speed a bomb will acquire when falling from a height of 300 meters.
                      1. +1
                        2 July 2024 17: 49
                        Alas, the FAB with the UMPC does not fall vertically, but approaches the target at an angle of 30 to 60 degrees. So the acceleration of gravity there is not enough for a complete calculation. I didn’t just recommend that you study. And not only physics, but also just thinking!
                      2. 0
                        2 July 2024 18: 28
                        Quote: sH, arK
                        Alas, the FAB with the UMPC does not fall vertically, but approaches the target at an angle of 30 to 60 degrees. So the acceleration of gravity there is not enough for a complete calculation.

                        Since vertical speed is needed to break through ceilings, this is what interests us.

                        Quote: sH, arK
                        I didn’t just recommend that you study.

                        I also recommended that you follow your own advice for a reason.

                        Quote: sH, arK
                        And not only physics, but also just thinking!

                        And that too.
      2. 0
        1 July 2024 10: 01
        the shorter the range of independent flight

        In principle, no one bothers to attach a cheap disposable solid fuel booster engine to the bomb. Can be separated after production. With him, she will noticeably fly further...
        1. +2
          1 July 2024 10: 49
          disposable booster solid propellant engine
          When Shoigu visited the plant where these FABs were manufactured, it was transparently hinted at some kind of powder accelerators for it, which would be logical for such a weight. Now, no matter how much I read about it, this is not mentioned anywhere else
      3. +3
        1 July 2024 14: 55
        What does the weight of a bomb have to do with its flight range? If you think like this, then a 5,45 bullet will fly further than a 7,62 (at the same initial speed), but this is not at all the case. The flight range of any object in the air is influenced by air resistance, consisting of drag, friction, and inductive resistance. These types of resistance depend on linear dimensions. As the linear dimensions increase, the resistance increases accordingly, but the mass (and kinetic energy) increases in the cube, so a heavier bullet will fly further.
        As for the FAB-3000 with UMPC, the flight range depends only on the design of UMPC (under equal release conditions). And the UMPC for FAB-3000 is not the same as for FAB-1500.
    2. 0
      1 July 2024 09: 17
      In order for a FAB to hit an air defense missile system, you must first find it. They are located relatively “in depth”; the release range does not always allow.
  2. +1
    1 July 2024 06: 35
    The Su-34 can lift one three-ton EMNIP, but one and a half is already three, and not two at all.
  3. The comment was deleted.
  4. +2
    1 July 2024 07: 33
    Excerpt from the history of the Pe-8 aircraft about the use of FAB-5000:

    “To determine the force of the explosion of the bomb, they decided to drop it at a nearby test site. And even those who could not see from the air how, after the flash, the blast wave cleared several hectares of forest from trees in a matter of seconds, felt at the moment of the explosion how the earth shook. The crater is the diameter of about a hundred meters made an impression..."

    And when I watch a video about the FAB-3000 with the UMPC, the question arises: why is there nothing similar in the consequences of the explosion, does the difference in the mass of the explosive really have such a strong effect?
    1. -1
      1 July 2024 09: 18
      The greater the weight of the bomb, the larger part of it goes to the body, and the weight of the explosive decreases accordingly. If the bomb is a penetrating type (the body walls are thicker), this ratio changes even more.
      1. +2
        1 July 2024 09: 26
        Quote: TermNachTER
        The greater the weight of the bomb, the larger part of it goes to the body, and the weight of the explosive decreases accordingly.

        It should be the other way around, mathematically.
        1. 0
          1 July 2024 09: 29
          I don’t know how to do it mathematically, find data on aerial bombs on the Internet and look at the ratio between the weight of the bomb and the weight of the explosive.
          1. +3
            1 July 2024 09: 37
            Quote: TermNachTER
            Find data on aerial bombs on the Internet and look at the ratio between the weight of the bomb and the weight of the explosive.

            Can't you do it yourself? FAB-500-M54: weight 528 kg, explosives 201 kg. 38 percent explosive. FAB-3000-M54: weight 3067 kg, explosives 1200 kg. 39 percent explosives.
    2. 0
      2 July 2024 15: 28
      Strongly depends on the setting of the detonator and the speed of the bomb at the moment of explosion. 3-5-9 tons should go deep into the ground and destroy underground structures with a shock wave.
      With this application, there will be maximum benefit from land mines.
      And for how they are used now, ODAB of the same weight that is used is better suited.
  5. +2
    1 July 2024 08: 15
    The leadership of the Ministry of Defense inspects the production of large-caliber bombs, February 2024

    why FABs? and not ODABs? - if they do not take it from storage, but produce it?
  6. +1
    1 July 2024 09: 15
    The news is somehow a little outdated, the video was posted a week ago. Although it is difficult to judge by the force of the explosion.
    1. 0
      1 July 2024 11: 18
      So, I wanted to joke about Estonian news myself :)
  7. UAT
    -4
    1 July 2024 10: 02
    showed an air bomb hit the village of Volchansk
    - for a guided bomb to hit a populated area is a gigantic achievement. The German FAUs with their hits in London are smoking on the sidelines.
    1. -1
      1 July 2024 11: 59
      Well, don’t find fault, a good editor is a rarity these days)))
    2. UAT
      0
      10 July 2024 20: 24
      Additionally, for those in the tank, I inform you that comparing the accuracy of our adjustable bomb (according to the text of the article) with the German FAU is sarcasm.
  8. +2
    1 July 2024 10: 08
    "Obvious advantages" (c)
    The author did not provide any clear advantages. Unfortunately.
    In my opinion, this solution has more disadvantages than advantages. Even the UMPC with such a bomb is already a full-fledged all-metal airframe with a large reflective surface. Four "five hundred" flying in a swarm, but at one target, will cause more damage than a "three-ton". And it’s easier for the plane to pick them up and you can reconfigure targets in flight by hitting up to four different ones, if the first one has disappeared somewhere, left, dispersed, etc.
    1. 0
      1 July 2024 12: 00
      Such opinions were also heard. I think that the truth will become clear when there are some statistics and results of using both.
  9. 0
    1 July 2024 13: 33
    There are persistent rumors that three liters is not the limit and canisters for five and nine are being prepared. True, the question of carriers arises.
    1. +1
      1 July 2024 19: 27
      And why does a goat need an accordion? Unless for the future or against a completely defenseless enemy.
      In my opinion, there is a great need for cluster bombs with cumulative fragmentation submunitions. Especially in the field, where the effectiveness of conventional high-explosive weapons is not so obvious.
      Cluster munitions provide a large coverage area, and you can’t hide from PTAB-2,5KO cumulative submunitions even in a dugout.
    2. 0
      25 August 2024 15: 21
      https://www.airwar.ru/weapon/ab/fab9000m54.html
  10. 0
    2 July 2024 08: 06
    It feels like Shoigu did not arm us with what we needed. Now we take out developments from the 40s (!!) and put them into production. Land mines and vacuum bombs have catastrophic indirect effects, destroying everything.
    1. 0
      25 August 2024 15: 35
      Here on one plane there are 20 precision bombs: [media=https://i.okcdn.ru/i?r=BUHoKFKCs3-57yPBZdu-SuAVrZxg-b5s-BtSOAB-EVsYhbyTlqkshLtvCvttRIA2xam4nAQ0sfb90RIO1R1vTcnW&dpr=2]