“Underground” tank and “Shishiga”: treasury of the Gorky Automobile Plant

35
“Underground” tank and “Shishiga”: treasury of the Gorky Automobile Plant
"Underground" танк, dug up by factory workers in one of the GAZ workshops.


Technical artifacts


Lenin Avenue, in the Avtozavodsky district of Nizhny Novgorod, for the amateur stories famous for two things - the legendary main entrance of the Gorky Automobile Plant and the museum of the enterprise of the same name. But if the checkpoint, from the gates of which GAZ released military equipment and trucks during the war, is not even advisable to photograph (at least that’s what the controller put it), then with the museum everything is simpler - it is open to visitors.



Its history dates back to 1965, but it became truly modern at the end of 2022, when the St. Petersburg office “SIB-Project” noticeably transformed the design of the museum. All the pleasures cost half a billion rubles, but they were worth it - the exhibition’s design was on par with the best automobile museums in the world.

A review of the museum’s contents should begin with two remarkable exhibits.

Of course, all GAZ relics are remarkable without exception, but there are a couple of special ones. True fans of the Military Review will surely love the T-70 tank hull, discovered during the reconstruction of the metal coating shop, the production of fittings and wheels. It was literally dug out of the ground in 2008. How it got there is unknown, but the information plate reads:

“During the Great Patriotic War, GAZ not only produced, but also repaired tanks coming from the front. If a tank was severely damaged in battle, everything that could be used in the future was removed from it. The armored hull remained. In this case, it could well have been used as a shelter during air raids. Thanks to “preservation” underground, the find was perfectly preserved. This unusual exhibit was left for posterity; it serves as another evidence of the heroism of home front workers.”

How many more such historical artifacts are stored in the buildings of the Gorky Automobile Plant?




The body of the T-70, nicknamed the “underground” tank. Apparently it served to protect factory workers during bombings.

A significant part of the exhibition is occupied by a reconstruction of the life of GAZ workers in the tragic years 1941–1945. The Nazis mercilessly bombed an automobile plant that produced products critical to the front. The memorial with photographs and names of GAZ workers and employees who died under the bombs is a very clear and poignant reminder of those times. Enemy raids aviation caused such significant damage that in 1944, for the early liquidation of the consequences of the bombing, the plant was awarded the second Order of the Red Banner.

In the same tragic series is the original funeral service in the name of Varvara Ivanovna Larina, who was informed that

“your son, Lieutenant Sergei Mikhailovich Larin, died in the battle for the socialist Motherland, faithful to the military oath, showing heroism and courage, on June 23, 1944. He was buried with military honors in the village of Yanchin, Tiraspol region."
.



Reconstruction of the life of car factory workers during the Great Patriotic War. Pay attention to the heater from the final drive housing. The hole was probably caused by another Nazi air raid.

The T-70 light tank is reminiscent not only of its hull, but also of the document awarding the title of Hero of Socialist Labor to Nikolai Aleksandrovich Astrov, the main developer of the tracked armored vehicle.

By the way, the assembled tank is not on display, but you can get a closer look at it on numerous pedestals in Nizhny Novgorod. In total, Gorky produced 8 T-226 tanks, including 70 during the war. It is rightfully considered the best light tank of the Second World War and the second most popular after the T-6.




Invaluable witnesses to the triumph and tragedy of the past

Let us move from the glorious and tragic history of the Gorky Automobile Plant during the Great Patriotic War to modern times. More precisely, in 1992–1995.

At this time, the GAZ-3302 Gazelle light commercial vehicle was undergoing bench tests. The car is legendary in every sense. It became a “golden” model for the car plant and allowed it not to perish in the turbulent post-perestroika years of the new Russia.

Let's remember that the lorry began to be developed back in the mid-80s, but the car appeared on the assembly line only on July 20, 1994. The museum displays a pre-production copy that has covered 270 thousand bench and road kilometers. The car is frankly tired, but not broken. The names of the designers, testers, technologists and other creators of the Gazelle were placed on the cockpit.








Record Gazelle after 270 thousand test kilometers. Noteworthy is the hydraulic mechanism for loading ballast on board.












Prototype and sketches of the future Gazelle

Noteworthy is the unusual lift-type loading mechanism, apparently designed to facilitate loading the machine with ballast in the field. There is no explanation of the purpose of this device on the presented information stands.

Combat background


If we say “military GAZ”, we invariably remember the GAZ-66, nicknamed “Shishiga”. The fine truck occupies a significant place in the museum’s exhibition.

The production of the car began on July 1, 1964 - this year “Shishige” will turn 60 years old! Some of them still roam the roads, and some of them even fight in Ukraine, although mostly on the enemy side. The GAZ-66 was produced in various modifications until September 1999.

The total circulation is 964 cars. Apparently, numerous prototypes have not survived to this day and are presented only in archival photographs.

GAZ-66 is a car that is as legendary as it is controversial. But on the information plaque in the museum everything is optimistic:

“One of the striking technical solutions of the GAZ-66 is the cab that tilts forward, allowing access to the engine. The compact cabin frees up space for a more spacious body. For easy access to the cab, crown steps are provided on the front wheel hubs. The driver's work is facilitated by power steering and a hydraulic vacuum brake booster.

The smooth ride is enhanced by elongated springs with a “soft characteristic” and telescopic shock absorbers on both axles. A sleeping hammock could be hung across the cabin.

The only inconvenience was the location of the gearbox shift levers, front axle connections and range (on the right, rear), but one could get used to this drawback.”




"Shishiga" in its best years.


Prototype GAZ-66A with sealed brakes and a GAZ-62 type cab, 1957


Everything for the convenience of the driver and mechanic


In the photo there is a GAZ-66B, an experimental vehicle for the Airborne Forces
























The evolution of the main GAZ emblem

The immediate predecessor of the Shishiga can be considered the GAZ-63, for which a group of designers from the Gorky Automobile Plant received the Stalin Prize on March 6, 1950. GAZ-63 is the first all-wheel drive truck of the Gorky automakers and the first mass-produced 4x4 truck in the Soviet Union.

The car was also the first in the USSR to use the same track on the front and rear wheels and single-pitch tires on both the front and rear, which reduced rolling resistance when driving on sticky soil and snow. The front axle was connected rigidly, and a reduction gear in the transfer case further increased cross-country ability. The exhibition features a GAZ-63A car, additionally equipped with a winch.


GAZ-63A - the first domestic mass-produced truck with all-wheel drive


Experimental GAZ-63A on arched tires with dimensions 1x000


Road train consisting of a GAZ-63P truck tractor and a PAZ-744P semi-trailer, 1958


Truck tractor GAZ-63D with a power take-off for working with a semi-trailer dump truck, 1959

It is very difficult to cover the exhibition of the GAZ History Museum within the framework of one material, but one thing can be said - the car factory workers succeeded. Light, modern, interesting, although not without some excesses.

For example, in the Western style, they hung the Volga on steel cables from the ceiling. For what? If they wanted to show the configuration of the sedan's underbody, then they could simply put the car on its side. Although the vast majority of visitors are completely indifferent to what the Volga has under its body. Although some ladies are really impressed by the sedan floating in the air. If that was what it was intended to do, then it worked.




If you rely on the content of the exhibition, you get the impression that GAZ has been taking care of the safety of experimental and prototype cars only since the late 90s.

The museum has very few experimental machines created before this period - all search models are exclusively in the photo. And this is depressing, although this in no way detracts from the uniqueness of the GAZ History Museum.
35 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +17
    24 June 2024 05: 05
    GAZ-63 is the first all-wheel drive truck from Gorky automakers

    Me and Masha.
  2. +4
    24 June 2024 06: 43
    The problem with the museum and others like it is that under the USSR such museums were closed to visitors “from the street.”
    Why tear out veins and fight for exhibits if the authorities compulsorily force you to take a tour?
    And on top everything was polished with the “Secret” formula - what if in the 1970s the enemies find out what the T-70 was made of, what type of roofing tin???
    Who prevented the Moscow Region from transferring samples of captured equipment to museums?

    The general position of the state also did not particularly contribute to increasing the content of the exhibitions.
    No efforts were made to preserve equipment samples.
    Given the frantic production volumes, there was no complete tank left at the manufacturing plant - this is an obscene joke. There is not even a discussion about prototypes - they simply don’t exist.
    The problem is the same with planes and ships. Moreover, if the ships were relatively few in number, then the banal PO-2s were stamped into the mountains.
    But they are not there either.
    There are a lot of pre-war planes flying in the USA - we have one and a half pieces for the whole country, no more.

    And this was the case under the USSR and is no better now
    1. 0
      24 June 2024 07: 47
      It's a shame that the designers and directors don't want to leave a memory of themselves. It would be in the museum that the memory of the creators and leaders would remain.
    2. +2
      24 June 2024 07: 53
      Who prevented the Moscow Region from transferring samples of captured equipment to museums?

      And not only in museums, it would look good if there was a T34, KV, IS, BM, IL, Yak, etc. on a pedestal, and at the foot of it there was a broken trophy tank, plane, gun. And necessarily with crosses on the sides, so that everyone would remember who exactly our grandfathers smashed.
      1. +2
        24 June 2024 08: 14
        if there is a T34, KV, IS, BM, IL, YAK, etc. on the pedestal - the problem is that there is practically no equipment from the beginning of the war at all and they stand en masse on a pedestal post-war t-34-85.
        And it would be fine if they were all burned or melted down during the war (there was no time for museums!). No, quite a large number came under pressure after the war, and even in the 1970s.
        It’s the same garbage with airplanes - they flew on -2 back in the 1960s.
        It’s easy to push slogans like “No one is forgotten..”, but to do something to preserve memory - oh well...

        A trivial example: about 10 years ago I saw a Sherman in the south on a railway repair train!! Without a turret, but judging by the dirt on the tracks, it’s on the move!!
        Someone bothered to transfer it to the museum? Very unlikely....
        There has never been a memory in Rus' and there will never be such a thing...
        1. +1
          24 June 2024 08: 19
          It’s easy to push slogans like “No one is forgotten..”, but to do something to preserve memory - oh well...

          I completely agree with you, but you don’t have to dance on a rake, don’t repeat mistakes, so that
          There has never been a memory in Rus' and there will never be such a thing...

          after all, now there is also a war with a strange name, and future monuments are now standing in fields and forests. I would like to preserve them as a reminder for posterity.
          1. -1
            24 June 2024 08: 28
            I would like to preserve them as a reminder for posterity.
            Looks like they're trying to do something with the trophies.
            The story of the exhibition of captured equipment in Moscow during the Great Patriotic War and after it may repeat itself. Some things were saved, the bulk was melted down.
            1. 0
              24 June 2024 08: 36
              History may repeat itself with the exhibition of captured equipment in Moscow

              Yes, it’s good that now in every city there should be this broken enemy equipment in the squares, even if it’s just a truck with their symbols.
              1. +1
                24 June 2024 08: 41
                I would put Abrams in front of the US Embassy. In a bunch..
                And the Leopard opposite the German...
                1. +1
                  24 June 2024 14: 48
                  I would put Abrams in front of the US Embassy. In a bunch..
                  And the Leopard opposite the German...
                  - interesting - who decided to stand up for the USA and Abrams and Leo and minus dripped?
                2. +1
                  24 June 2024 22: 12
                  I would put Abrams in front of the US Embassy. In a bunch..
                  And the Leopard opposite the German...

                  It’s a shame to pollute the clean streets of the Capital with all sorts of crap...
        2. +1
          24 June 2024 20: 31
          and the post-war T-34-85 stand en masse on a pedestal.
          Surprisingly, there is a T-70 in Bakhchisarai, and a T-34-76 in Sevastopol and Simferopol. But this is rare.
          1. +1
            24 June 2024 21: 33
            Quote: Aviator_
            and the post-war T-34-85 stand en masse on a pedestal.
            Surprisingly, there is a T-70 in Bakhchisarai, and a T-34-76 in Sevastopol and Simferopol. But that's rare.
            -well, what am I talking about!!!
            in Mongolia, in the steppes, 10 years ago, there were abandoned/destroyed tanks and armored vehicles from the time of Khalkhin-Gol - I came across a big article on this issue. There were such photos - my heart bleeds...
            Who stopped you from coming and silently picking them up during the USSR?
            The Mongols wouldn’t even understand what, where, why....
            Do we have many live BTs and T-26s?
    3. 0
      24 June 2024 14: 19
      Yeah, take the Americans, what kind of aviation and space museum, and here we have exhibits like these rotting in the open air in Monino, it’s a shame.
    4. 0
      24 June 2024 18: 14
      The KVZ museum has the original PO-2, see https://dzen.ru/a/YbpKm4Rp4CyG_nY3
      1. +1
        24 June 2024 21: 22
        Quote: Vitaly Koisin
        https://dzen.ru/a/YbpKm4Rp4CyG_nY3
        -
        at the factory that produced 11(ELEVEN THOUSAND!!) Po-2 as much as 2 Po-2
        - 1 with cut wings (obviously not flying!!) and 1 new-made model (I suspect that it also doesn’t fly because it’s a model).
        2/11 is a normal ratio, respectful belay to the story
        Half of the production (almost 5000) of Airacobras came to us, 11 of 27 twice heroes of fighters flew on it. Are there any flying ones now?!! 3 monuments on pedestals without contents. That's all...

        and USA:
        Air show of legendary aircraft, including: Spitfires, Mustangs, Airacobra, B-17, Catalina, Wildcat, Hellcat, Mitchell, Thunderbolt, Corsairs, Lancaster, Gladiator, Hurricanes, etc. From our I-15. Short interviews with pilots. The picture is good, the sound of the roar of piston engines is excellent!
        https://vk.com/wall-76992071_259885

        flying.....
        1. 0
          26 June 2024 19: 51
          Why are there flying Po-2s at the factory? Well done for keeping at least one in the museum. And on their territory there are half a dozen old “turntables” in the form of monuments, someone caring also tried at one time.

          Our problem with “flying rarities” is that during the Soviet era, a private individual could not own an airplane. Now it is possible, but 1) there is almost no technology left and 2) for this business to become widespread (as in the USA), a much larger layer of the “upper middle class” with excess money is needed (also like in the USA). Plus, our corresponding infrastructure is lame.

          So it’s not the factories and museums that are to blame, but our history has turned out that way.
          1. 0
            26 June 2024 21: 35
            Quote: Vitaly Koisin
            Our problem with “flying rarities” is that during the Soviet era, a private individual could not own an airplane.
            What was the problem with the car?
            Do you see a lot of Studebakers, for example?
            Quote: Vitaly Koisin
            So it’s not the factories and museums that are to blame, but our history has turned out that way.

            in the Kursk region, in a gully there was a bombed German convoy in the 1970s - it was overgrown with forest. There were several tanks, trucks, a couple of buses, and several armored personnel carriers.
            In the 1980s, it was cut up for scrap metal. And okay, tanks are still heavy, but why bother with passenger cars? I still can’t understand the logic...
            1. 0
              26 June 2024 22: 49
              Well, Studebaker is a truck. How many private individuals owned a truck or bus in the USSR, even in its later years? There didn’t seem to be a legal ban on this, but I don’t remember anything like that. Was it even possible to buy a used one? Or were they reduced to the state of scrap metal in the army and the national economy?

              Another thing, for example, Willis. If they had been given to the people after they were written off, our men would have put them in order and would have been driving around for another 50 years :) Why this didn’t work out, I don’t know. In general, was it really possible to buy even a domestic light vehicle, decommissioned from the Ministry of Defense or any other ministry?..

              And during the war and after it was strict even with cars and motorcycles, restored by the population from those abandoned by the Germans. If a person could not prove the legality of the acquisition, they confiscated it.
              1. +1
                10 October 2024 16: 42
                My father relayed the words of a familiar driver.
                It was time to sum up the results of Lend-Lease: according to the terms, the undamaged equipment had to be returned or paid for. So the narrator invested in his "Studer-swallow" to the maximum: he straightened out the bent tin, replaced some body boards, painted it - it became as good as new, gnawed out an unworn set of tires from the garage manager, equipped it with everything that was there upon receipt... And on command, he drove to the port where the acceptance was. From the pier, the car was loaded onto an American ship by crane and - straight to the press. The driver, a man who had gone through the Great Patriotic War, sobbed.
                I strongly suspect that they dealt with the Willys in the same way as with the trucks. The same with other equipment. I know for sure that they kept the Bell P-63 Kingcobra; I think that they also kept the delivered steam locomotives. Gasoline, gunpowder, small arms and cartridges, duralumin, uniforms and shoes, food, etc., were probably written off.
                And yet, the final settlement under Lend-Lease was already made by an independent, free and democratic Russian Federation. lol
        2. +1
          26 June 2024 23: 00
          Quote: your1970
          Airshow of legendary aircraft, including: Spitfires, Mustangs, Airacobra, B-17, Catalina, Wildcat, Hellcat, Mitchell, Thunderbolt, Corsairs, Lancaster, Gladiator, Hurricanes, etc.


          Well, what do the factories and the state have to do with all this? Have you watched the video yourself? All these cars were recreated through the efforts of enthusiasts. So the “Iron Curtain” did not hang over them. US and British aircraft could receive spare parts from factories.
          The An-2 is also still flying. And he, you will be surprised, is only 6 years younger than the same Airacobra. 1947, and that one 1941.
          Don't ask for the impossible. The US citizens also have quite a few Soviet flying rarities. There is one I-15 for the entire show. Moreover, it is not clear how the person got there...
          Russia has I-15 too. They are in a hangar in Monino. But they are also wooden and difficult to store. But there are also flying ones. There are even new ones assembled according to old drawings.

          Quote: your1970
          (almost 5000) Airacobra came to us, 11 out of 27 fighter heroes flew on it twice. Are there any flying now?!! 3 monuments on pedestals without contents. All....

          So they got under Lend-Lease. Surely they were all returned in fulfillment of the contract. There was no point in storing them. After the start of the Cold War by the West, all US equipment lost any usefulness.
          1. 0
            10 October 2024 16: 43
            There was only one I-15 for the entire show. And it's unclear how it got there...

            It may be a modern full-size model.
    5. 0
      26 June 2024 22: 36
      Quote: your1970
      The problem with the museum and others like it is that under the USSR such museums were closed to visitors “from the street.”

      Because for the most part they were located on the territory of enterprises. But in the USSR it was not so easy to find a large machine-building enterprise without “closed workshops”.

      Quote: your1970
      Who prevented the Moscow Region from transferring samples of captured equipment to museums?

      Nobody interfered. But at that moment, when there was a lot of captured equipment, there were no thematic museums. And when thematic museums appeared, captured equipment had already disappeared.
      In addition, the Ministry of Defense of the USSR and the Russian Federation have two of their own museums. Museum of the Armed Forces in Moscow and the Armored Museum in Kubinka.

      Quote: your1970
      The general position of the state also did not particularly contribute to increasing the content of the exhibitions.

      Expositions of what? Factory museums? So the creation of such museums was outside the authority of the relevant ministries. They were created on the initiative of the plant management and neither the Ministry of Culture nor the Moscow Region had anything to do with them. These museums were not listed on their balance sheets; often even their employees held “leftist” positions. In addition, experimental samples often did not survive testing at all - they were simply rolled into scrap metal during endurance tests.

      Quote: your1970
      No efforts were made to preserve equipment samples.

      What samples? Serial? Experimental? Trophy? Which ones?
      When creating particularly complex equipment in the status of experimental, experimental and low-volume production, up to a hundred machines can be in service. Keep them all? Museum exhibits must still have some kind of uniqueness and historical value. The museum is not a trash heap or a dump to store everything.

      Quote: your1970
      Given the frantic production volumes, there was no complete tank left at the manufacturing plant - this is an obscene joke.


      No. This is the norm. The plant does not make tanks for itself. He makes them to order from the Moscow Region and in exactly the quantity ordered. No more. And when a model change occurs, assembly in the workshops not only stops, but all technological equipment is dismantled. The only thing that may remain at the factory is a defect that was not accepted by military personnel. But even that! No one will allow it to be left complete - with weapons.
      The only way to acquire a complete tank for a museum is to get a decommissioned one. But who will tell you when which tank will be written off?

      Quote: your1970
      There is not even a discussion about prototypes - they simply don’t exist.

      And it can't be. That's why they are prototypes. The preservation of any of them is always a historical accident.

      Quote: your1970
      banal PO-2s were stamped into the mountains.
      But they are not there either.

      Can you imagine what it’s like to preserve a wooden airplane? For reference, during WW1, Russian aviation suffered catastrophic losses not from anti-aircraft artillery and fighters, but from rain, snow and temperature changes in the fall and spring. Wood is hygroscopic, it rots. The plywood delaminates due to dampness and the fabric tears. Po-2 was produced from 1928 to 1953. At a time when domestic chemistry did not amaze with its successes. Now fill this tree with antiseptics until it has a plastic sheen and it will stand for at least 100 years. And then it was very sour with this. In order to save such a plane, he needed to build a hangar :)

      Quote: your1970
      There are a lot of pre-war planes flying in the USA - we have one and a half pieces for the whole country, no more.


      Because in the USA they did not go through the crucible of war on their territory. In the USSR, the pre-war aircraft fleet was almost completely destroyed. And during the war years, factories deliberately simplified those. process for the sake of increasing the shaft.
      1. 0
        27 June 2024 07: 58
        Nobody interfered. - persuaded. It came out by itself. No and no - and what the hell with her, with that story...
        When no one needs her, no one will even think about people,
        It was necessary to exert force, to wrinkle my forehead...
        Why build a hangar for old junk - God forbid the children will come to look.

        Armored Museum in Kubinka. - can you somehow justify what was top-secret in that museum, that it was closed under the USSR?
        Composition of the roofing sheets of pre-war tanks?
        Trophies? So their manufacturers knew that the USSR received them from its allies.
        American collectors had our T-72s already in the early 1980s.
        What else prevented children from opening the museum?


        On the issue of safety.
        In my yard there is a slab of army rutted road surface. 1957 Year of release. For tanks intended.
        Until 1971 it was used for its intended purpose - then it was privatized feel
        Manure belay , snow, rain, sun, temperature difference from +45 to - 30, chopping wood and butchering pigs...
        She is better preserved than me - although I am younger crying
        She is from plywood...
        1. 0
          27 June 2024 14: 20
          Quote: your1970
          When no one needs her, no one will even think about people,

          There is elderberry in the garden, and in Kyiv TsIPSO? Do you really want to raise the topic of “the crazy totalitarian regime”? Are you talking about museums or about “GulyagZ and Keijibi”? Or were they “filled with meat” out of apology?

          I will repeat to you again: those museums that were official and not self-made received equipment from all possible sources. Both trophy and experienced. In Kubinka, it is experienced tanks that are present in fair numbers.

          Quote: your1970
          Why build a hangar for old junk - God forbid the children will come to look.

          Wouldn’t you suggest “distributing it to pensioners”? Do you even understand what was going on in the country in the 50s? Or are you one of the abstract theorists who demand that Ivan the Terrible be condemned for neglecting human rights?
          In the 50s, half of the country lay in ruins, then do you propose to build hangars for the I-16?

          Quote: your1970
          Was there anything top-secret about that museum that was closed under the USSR?

          I think it’s these experimental machines. But this is not a question for me, this is for the organizers of the museum - the USSR Ministry of Defense. The Museum of the Soviet Army with its tank exhibition was open.

          Quote: your1970
          In my yard there is a slab of army rutted road surface. 1957 release. Designed for tanks.

          Congratulations. Does your stove look like this?
          1. 0
            27 June 2024 14: 54
            Do you really want to raise the topic of the “fucking totalitarian regime”? - What does “bloody or not bloody” regime have to do with it?

            I will repeat to you again: those museums that were official and not self-made received equipment from all possible sources. Both trophy and experienced. and what did it change - if they were CLOSED?
            Gorgeous exhibitions - that no one has seen?

            In the 50s, half of the country lay in ruins, then do you propose to build hangars for the I-16? I gave an example from the 1980s - with a column.
            I gave an example with PO-2, which was still flying at the beginning of 1970.
            I gave you an example with tanks at Khalkhin Gol, since there are no pre-war ones left.
            In the Cup, in the divisional warehouses in 1989, there were pre-war Mausers with a silencer. The warehouse manager said that they prepared it for Afghan special forces, they brought it, but they didn’t send it. There were about 50 boxes of them - they were carried during the reception of the warehouse. We saw everything from the mines...

            But this is not a question for me, this is for the organizers of the museum - the USSR Ministry of Defense. - was in service until 1998 and was withdrawn from service by order of the Chief of Communications of the RF Armed Forces - “Trolley on a two-wheeled bicycle for transporting carrier pigeons” adopted in 1928 for service. The order was marked “Secret” - otherwise the Americans would find out about the pigeons.
            And there were also Baudot, Schmidt and other devices from 1920-1940.
            Terribly secret things for 1998....
  3. +3
    24 June 2024 07: 25
    Thanks to the author for an interesting excursion!
    Given the news, this article is distracting or something...

    they suspended the Volga from the ceiling on steel cables. For what?

    Maybe based on the movie?
  4. UVB
    +2
    24 June 2024 09: 15
    There was also a three-axle version of the GAZ-66 called GAZ-34. A total of 5 copies were produced, but did not go into production, including due to the appearance of the ZIL-131
    1. +1
      24 June 2024 12: 50
      A total of 5 copies were produced, but did not go into production, including due to the appearance of the ZIL-131

      ZiL-131 appeared ten years earlier than GAZ-34 - in 1956. In 1966 ZiL-131 was mass-produced, and GAZ-34 in 1967 only passed state tests, which did not reveal any advantages of GAZ-34 over ZiL-131. The result is logical.
      1. UVB
        +1
        24 June 2024 18: 53
        Quote from Frettaskyrandi
        ZIL - 131 appeared ten years earlier than GAZ - 34 - in 1956

        Have you missed anything? In 1958, only the ZIL-157 began to be produced; the 131st could not have appeared in 1956.
        1. 0
          24 June 2024 20: 58
          You haven’t messed up anything?

          No, they didn't. The photo shows an experimental ZIL-131, 1956.
  5. 0
    24 June 2024 12: 51
    This does not in any way detract from the uniqueness of the GAZ History Museum.

    And what makes it unique? Are there no other museums like this in the world?
  6. 0
    24 June 2024 16: 50
    To complete the picture ...
  7. 0
    30 August 2024 10: 35
    The only inconvenience was the location of the gearshift levers, the front axle and the demultiplier (on the right, at the back), but you could get used to this drawback.


    The clinical cretin who scribbled THIS should be immediately placed in a mental hospital for life. With a ban on contact with normal people. Let him discuss with monkeys in the zoo what "you can get used to".
  8. 0
    29 September 2024 16: 11
    I wonder what is meant by "sealed brakes"?