Old Leopard tanks can be upgraded as air defense systems with the Skyranger 35 turret

13 665 29
Old Leopard tanks can be upgraded as air defense systems with the Skyranger 35 turret
Anti-aircraft complex Skyranger 35 on the chassis tank Leopard 2A4


Over the past years, Rheinmetall has been promoting the Skyranger family of anti-aircraft artillery systems on the market. One of the key advantages of such combat modules is compatibility with different chassis, which is regularly demonstrated using new prototypes. This time, Rheinmetall presented three promising Skyrenger ZACs on different bases, incl. based on a tank.



Anti-aircraft guns from the exhibition


On June 17, the next military-technical exhibition Eurosatory opened in Paris. One of the regular participants of this event is the German company Rheinmetall, and each time it presents new developments of various kinds that are of great interest. This time the company paid attention to the direction of land anti-aircraft systems and presented three unified models of this class at once.

New anti-aircraft artillery / missile and artillery systems are built using unified combat modules of the Skyranger family. Modules of two main types are used, as well as three different chassis. Due to this, potential buyers were able to offer three models of equipment with different features, but similar parameters.

Two SAM systems are made using Skyranger 30 combat modules, equipped with 30-mm automatic cannons and guided missiles. rockets "surface-to-air". One turret of this type was mounted on a Lynx KF41 tracked chassis, while the other used a wheeled Boxer. It is curious that prototypes of the ZAK / ZRAK based on the Boxer with both types of the Skyranger module have already been demonstrated in the past. Thus, the carrier of the 30-mm gun was shown in 2022.


ZAK on the Lynx KF41 chassis

The third ZAK was carried out on the chassis of the main tank Leopard 2A4. The higher carrying capacity of such a vehicle made it possible to use the Skyranger 35 combat module with a larger caliber gun. The resulting self-propelled gun differs from the other two products in improved protection, higher firing range, etc.

On the first day of Eurosatory 2024, representatives of Germany, Hungary and Denmark signed a letter of intent to organize the production and supply of the ZAK / ZRAK Skyranger family. In the near future, three countries, within the framework of the international program European Sky Shield Initiative, will issue contracts to the manufacturing company for the production of the desired number of self-propelled guns with 30 mm guns. It is not specified which ZAKs will be purchased, but it is reported that they will be adapted to the wishes of specific customers.

Perspective development


During the exhibition, Rheinmetall management announced plans to develop another ZAK of the Skyrenger line. They plan to install a combat module with a 35-mm cannon on the chassis of the old Leopard 1 tank. Such a project will use existing experience, which will have a positive impact on the timing and quality of development.

A ZAK based on Leopard-1 is proposed to be made for a specific customer. They want to send such equipment to Ukraine to make up for the losses of anti-aircraft weapons. The Skyranger 35 self-propelled gun is considered as a direct replacement for Gepard armored vehicles. The latter were previously supplied to Ukraine in significant quantities by several foreign countries. At the same time, the equipment arrived in a fairly used condition, and then suffered serious losses.


Boxer / Skyranger 30 complex (photo from the Berlin exhibition ILA 2024)

The hypothetical contract for ZAK Leopard 1 / Skyranger 35 is of particular importance for Rheinmetall. With its help, the company will be able to make money and also get rid of accumulated stocks of obsolete tanks. In addition, the operation and combat use of the new ZAK in a real conflict zone should be a good advertisement for the entire Skyrenger family.

However, for now we are talking only about proposals and desires. The Leopard 1-based ZAK project exists only as a general concept that requires further development. This requires time and funding. The issue of producing and sending such equipment to the Kyiv regime has also not yet been resolved.

Battle Modules


The constantly expanding family of anti-aircraft self-propelled guns is built around two main elements - Skyranger combat modules. Both of these products are armored turrets with artillery (optional missile) weapons, ammunition, optics and control systems. Externally, in terms of layout and equipment, the Skyranger 30/35 modules are similar to each other, but there are significant differences associated with the weapons used.

The Skyranger 30 type module is equipped with a 30 mm Oerlikon KCA automatic cannon. This is a single-barrel gun chambered for 30x173 mm ammunition, capable of using different types of projectiles. The rate of fire reaches 1200 rounds/min. bursts or 200 rounds/min. single. The gun is equipped with a programmer for air-blasted projectiles. The maximum effective fire range is 3 km.

While maintaining the dimensions and weight at the level of the second module of the family, they were able to fit a retractable launcher for anti-aircraft missiles into the Skyranger 30 body. Previously, installations for two or four missiles taken from serial MANPADS were demonstrated. Earlier this year, for the first time, they presented a package for nine guides for small-sized missiles for intercepting UAVs.


Signing of preliminary agreements for the production of ZRAK Skyranger

The larger and heavier Skyrenger-35 turret is equipped with a 35-mm Oerlikon GDM automatic cannon. The gun uses 35x228 mm rounds with different types of shells, incl. with a programmable fuse. To work with the electronics of the projectile, a programmer is provided on the muzzle of the barrel. The gun's rate of fire is limited to 1000 rounds/min. Effective range – up to 4 km.

Both Skyrange modules are equipped with electric drives for guidance. Circular rotation around a vertical axis and barrel elevation at an angle of up to +85° are provided. A unified fire control system is used. An optical-electronic station and radar are used to detect and track targets, as well as monitor the results of firing. It is possible to install radars and EPS of different types, at the request of the customer. The complex is controlled by an operator or operators from a remote control inside the armored vehicle.

At the Eurosatory 2024 exhibition, Rheinmetall is showing three variants of the ZAK with Skyranger modules and promises one more. All these developments have a common architecture, but differ in different features and characteristics. Thus, self-propelled guns on the Lynx and Boxer chassis have an average combat weight and are protected only from small-caliber artillery and some types of grenade launchers. At the same time, they carry a module with a 30-mm cannon and missiles, which limits their combat radius.

From the point of view of firepower and protection, the ZAK based on the Leopard 2 MBT looks more interesting. Apparently, this combat vehicle has retained the standard projectile-proof armor on the front of the hull and other design features. Due to the tracked undercarriage and specific power, which has increased due to the abandonment of the standard tank turret, high mobility and maneuverability should be achieved. With all this, the combat radius of the complex is limited by the characteristics of the gun used and the lack of missiles.

The announced ZAK project based on Leopard-1 will be similar in firepower to the product shown at the current exhibition. At the same time, an outdated chassis will limit the overall level of protection and will not allow for high performance characteristics. However, this is not so important, since the project has completely different goals.


SB360 Wide Area Sensor radar from Electronics UK, suitable for use in Skyranger modules. In the background on the left is a ZAK on a Boxer chassis

Unclear future


Rheinmetall positions the Skyranger 30/35 complexes as a modern and effective means of combating tactical and army aviation enemy, as well as from UAVs of a number of classes. For well-known reasons, the latter occupy a special place in advertising and are considered almost as the main target for 30- and 35-mm shells. Taking into account such tasks, the composition of the MSA and other aspects of the project are determined.

To interest customers, the development company offers different options for anti-aircraft self-propelled guns using a pair of unified modules. In this context, all modern German-made armored chassis have already been used, and the next such ZAK was shown at Eurosatory 2024. They also promised another vehicle on an outdated base, which is expected to have some advantages.

It should be noted that Rheinmetall's efforts to promote the Skyrangers have had very limited results. Only a few days ago, the interest of potential customers turned into a preliminary agreement, contracts for which will appear only in the future. Whether new orders should be expected is a big question.

However, German gunsmiths have found an interesting solution to the sales problem. They propose a simplified version of the ZAK for transfer to the Kyiv regime. Military assistance to Ukraine has been a hot topic for three years now and, with the right approach, can make money. It is obvious that Rheinmetall plans to promote a self-propelled gun based on the Leopard 1 MBT specifically for profit, as well as for advertising in order to obtain further contracts.

However, the position of the Skyranger 30/35 project as a whole remains ambiguous. Despite many years of promotion on the market, it is not particularly popular, and an attempt to advertise it with the help of the Ukrainian Defense has dubious prospects. Time will tell whether the leading German arms company will be able to change this situation.
29 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. -5
    19 June 2024 05: 18
    Old Leopard tanks can be upgraded as air defense systems with the Skyranger 35 turret

    There is no particular point in this; old Leopard-1 tanks are mostly disposed of by transferring the APU or are inoperable. The new ZAK will use a modern wheeled or tracked base.
    1. +5
      19 June 2024 05: 23
      Quote: Bongo
      There is no particular point in this; old Leopard-1 tanks are mostly disposed of by transferring the APU or are inoperable.

      But nevertheless, this is the modularity of a healthy person.
    2. +4
      19 June 2024 06: 04
      The new ZAK will use a modern wheeled or tracked base

      For the new ZAK it is completely unclear what kind of base it will have - tracked or wheeled. At least horse-drawn. This will in no way prevent him from fulfilling his main task... wink
      1. +3
        19 June 2024 08: 27
        Quote: Luminman
        For the new ZAK it is completely unclear what kind of base it will have - tracked or wheeled. At least horse-drawn. This will in no way prevent him from fulfilling his main task...

        The turret with the artillery unit can theoretically be installed on a Panzerkampfwagen VI Ausf.H tank taken from a museum, or on the battleship Mikasa standing at the quay wall in the port of Yokosuka - it makes no difference. But when developing a new type of weapon, its life cycle is always taken into account, and therefore promising mobile air defense systems are usually placed on new chassis that will be produced in the future. This simplifies and reduces the cost of operation and repair.
    3. +3
      19 June 2024 11: 27
      Quote: Bongo
      There is no particular point in this; old Leopard-1 tanks are mostly disposed of by transferring the APU or are inoperable.

      There are Greece, Türkiye and Brazil, which have many first Leos. Their combat value is questionable, and disposing of them is a suffocation.
      1. +1
        19 June 2024 23: 35
        Well, on an ancient tank it’s better to install something simpler than a delicate anti-aircraft gun with an optical-electronic tracking station. The savings are most likely pennies on such a chassis. Would they make a better remote-controlled tank or ARV?
    4. 0
      19 June 2024 12: 53
      Quote: Bongo
      There is no particular point in this; old Leopard-1 tanks are mostly disposed of by transferring them to the Armed Forces


      This is a forced decision for the Ukrainian theater of operations, just like FrankenSAM
  2. -8
    19 June 2024 05: 51
    I want, I want to sell/sell them the old stuff, in a shiny new wrapper...
    But this does not solve the main problem, it does not provide effective protection against many threats that are present on the battlefield and in the rear. soldier
  3. +5
    19 June 2024 06: 15
    ...the position of the Skyranger 30/35 project as a whole remains ambiguous. Despite many years of promotion on the market, it is not particularly popular
    The Skyranger project is only a couple of years old.
    There are already firm orders from the German (on Boxer) and Austrian (on Pandura) Bundeswehr.
    And already Denmark (something of its own eight-wheeled) and Hungary (on a Lynx chassis) are joining. And some of the Balts also want it.

    So everything is fine with the Skyranger: smoothly from the ship's Millennium charger to the container Mantis for protecting bases to Skynex on trucks and now a purely military S-RAM ("against missiles, artillery shells and mines").
    "Depending on tactical needs and the required range of targets, the Skyranger can be equipped with a 35 x 228 KDG revolver gun or a 30 x 173 KCE revolver gun. Both guns feature a high rate of fire, excellent accuracy and air burst ammunition. The 35mm caliber provides C-RAM capabilities and an effective firing range of up to 4000 meters. The 30 mm caliber has an effective range of up to 3000 m, and the gun turret is also designed to mount short-range air defense missiles.
    The chosen highly modular design approach allows for customizable active or passive sensor configurations. These include AESA radars, passive panoramic vision systems and electro-optical packages. Advanced algorithms are used to combine sensor data, classify targets and support operators in decision making. As threats evolve, so does Skyranger. The possibility of integrating a high-energy laser or vertically launched C-PGM missiles is being considered.
    " https://www.rheinmetall.com/en/products/air-defence/air-defence-systems/mobile-air-defence-skyranger

    The Leo1 option - it seems to have appeared in the newspapers with a reference to the head of Rheinmetall, so it is very likely. The Ukrainian Armed Forces seem to have Skynex 35 mm, Leo1 too - why not use old, unnecessary and unfit for restoration Leo1s for the ZSU?
    "The head of Rheinmetall Landsysteme, Björn Bernhard, said that the 35-mm anti-aircraft gun is being integrated into the Leopard 1 MBT chassis for Ukraine. BILD reported that maintenance work on the Marder 1A3 IFV is ongoing, and the firm plans to supply ten Skyranger 35 artillery anti-aircraft missile systems on the Leopard 1 MBT chassis. The Skyranger 35's firepower consists of one 35 mm Oerlikon 35/1000 revolver cannon firing ammunition AHEAD air burst, which provides an increased probability of destruction compared to the existing Gepard self-propelled guns used by Ukraine, which use a pair of 35 mm revolver cannons.
    The German website hartpunkt.de reports that ten units are planned to be supplied to the Ukrainian Armed Forces. The Skyranger 35, a more advanced air defense artillery system than the Gepard, offers improved kill capabilities. While the Gepard uses a dual-axis search radar that rotates 360 degrees, the Skyranger 35 uses four AMMR AESA radars with greater accuracy against smaller targets such as UAVs. More importantly, AHEAD ammunition creates a cone of smaller projectiles when exploding in mid-air to hit smaller targets with fewer projectiles.
    " https://turdef.com/index.php/article/germany-integrates-skyranger-35-ad-system-on-leopard-1-mbt
  4. The comment was deleted.
  5. 0
    19 June 2024 07: 23

    Good old Bofors with a programmable universal projectile from BAE. Superior in range, reach, and power
    1. +1
      19 June 2024 07: 28
      1. 0
        20 June 2024 09: 22
        Good setting.
        I wonder if this installation can shoot down artillery shells?
  6. +1
    19 June 2024 07: 31
    In this area we will never accept 57mm “derivation”, the idea is the same but the projectile is more powerful. This is the machine we need, given what is essentially a drone war. Yes, and you can also install the module on the same armored personnel carrier.
    1. +1
      19 June 2024 13: 29
      The larger the projectile, the greater the radius of safe approach and the higher the risk of hitting your own when shooting at low-flying targets. 57 mm is for airplanes and helicopters.
      1. 0
        20 June 2024 04: 54
        Why, having a longer-range weapon, shoot down a UAV over the fighters? Shoot him down in 5 km, not 3
    2. 0
      20 June 2024 09: 23
      Here's the car you need

      The car and the idea itself are great.
  7. -4
    19 June 2024 08: 17
    Old buildings, first of all, need to be equipped and repaired.
  8. +7
    19 June 2024 10: 15
    The larger and heavier Skyrenger-35 turret is equipped with a 35-mm Oerlikon GDM automatic cannon. The gun uses 35x228 mm rounds with different types of shells, incl. with a programmable fuse. To work with the electronics of the projectile, a programmer is provided on the muzzle of the barrel. The gun's rate of fire is limited to 1000 rounds/min. Effective range – up to 4 km.

    A universal soldier... both air defense and anti-tank. There are probably armor-piercing shells too. It will remove optical-electronic gadgets from the tank's turret in seconds, pierce the barrel and destroy the tracks.
    The heavier the base, the more accurate the shooting.
    1. 0
      19 June 2024 19: 17
      Tell the truth... But I don’t understand why the good old “Cheetah” on the same chassis and with two 35-mm barrels is not upgraded to modern optical-electronics, because it will be no less effective!? Well, if it means a banal cut, then of course “that’s different”!
      1. +2
        19 June 2024 23: 30
        All these devices are being created for the new structure of NATO troops, which is a consequence of a revision of the concept of combat operations based on the experience of the war in the Ukrainian theater of operations.
        NATO doesn’t have the time to make cuts like before.

        Please read:
        https://defence-network.com/mittlere-kraefte/

        Some excerpts:
        "... This allows us to derive three justifications for the creation of medium forces:

        In terms of their composition and equipment, medium-sized forces represent a natural link between the tasks of ICM and LV/BV.
        Medium forces solve the operational problem of forward deployment of forces, for example, as a reinforcement force on the NATO flank. Because medium forces operate on wheels, they can be deployed more quickly and flexibly and are ready to perform operational missions in the operational area in a shorter time frame. A special role here is played by the possibility of timely deployment - they can serve as a quasi “operational wedge” for preparing military options for action and can be deployed independently in all corners of the alliance’s range in the shortest possible time. In such scenarios, medium forces quickly generate combat value for both defense and delay, but are only partially suited for offensive operations due to their limited assertiveness.
        The third rationale arises from the fact that the intermediate forces are reorganizing. They thus provide a special opportunity for the German Army to promote innovation. The focus is on the Sensor to Shooter chain and how to make that chain better, more efficient and therefore more effective. The topic of new weapons, such as the use and handling of "loitering munitions" and similar issues, can also be considered in connection with force generation. As mentioned several times, all Medium Power abilities should be tied to the wheel. What does this mean in detail? Being highly mobile alone and yet being able to act decisively, even in very intense combat, is the main criterion for a medium-sized force. This means they can reach specific operational areas to reinforce forces more quickly and independently. Better capabilities for combat prioritization and significant increases in operational flexibility give the military leader options he would not have with a heavy chain-based force."
    2. 0
      19 June 2024 23: 41
      Well, with such a fantasy, we can say that a cart with a zushka will have time to shoot at the tank so much that it will not seem enough to him, and there is no need to talk about air targets and infantry! But if a tank comes out to attack the anti-aircraft gun, then most likely the anti-aircraft gunners will try
  9. 0
    19 June 2024 11: 13
    The correct approach is to use different platforms for a unified ZU. For us, this could be a 57mm gun on tank platforms, APCs/BMPs, and even old SAM launchers.
  10. -3
    19 June 2024 12: 36
    Again, everything they have is junk and the future is not clear, but for us such an anti-aircraft gun would be useful against UAVs, but we do not have programmable projectiles for such calibers
  11. +1
    19 June 2024 16: 44
    A good crusher against any unmanned little things
  12. Lad
    -1
    19 June 2024 18: 58
    Judging by this site, Ukrainians are generally given only the very, very latest, latest junk, and then only purely to get away with it and sell completely outdated scrap metal from their hands. In short, this mess cannot even be compared with Russian weapons. Ukrainians... also don’t care about fighting, if compared with Russians, they can’t do it at all. In addition, the number of Ukrainians is several times lower. In short, no matter where you throw it, the enemy sucks. And everything seems clear here, but small (and nasty) questions arise all the time. Where are the Kyiv, Sumy, Kharkov regions? Where is Kherson? Where is Zmeiny? Where are Kyiv, Odessa and Lviv in three days? Why have three days already turned into three years, but there is no prospect in sight? Why is such a cool army with such advanced weapons still standing near Donetsk, and not near Paris? Why did the Black Sea fleet hide in a hole and sit there and not breathe? Why... But why ask? If you don’t even answer these questions, but just ask them, then all the local hurray articles will look very bad. .. And so yes, I fully support it 100% - this poor Skyranger is bullshit. There is no need to even take it into account. And it wasn’t worth writing about him. It's not worth the effort spent on the article. With both hands, as they say, for it.
  13. 0
    19 June 2024 21: 13
    They, of course, know better, but using the Leopard-2A4 as a base is too wasteful, in my opinion. It still needs to be modernized and modernized.
    But why not the Leopard-1 base? Or the Marder base, if it can handle the weight and recoil of the combat module. Well, the wheelbase of an off-road truck is just that!
  14. +2
    20 June 2024 08: 34
    Quote from alexoff
    But if a tank comes out to attack the anti-aircraft gun, then most likely the anti-aircraft gunners will try

    Yes, yes...of course. The speed of rotation of the anti-aircraft gun turret is 10 times faster. You might as well remember the Great Patriotic War and the German acht acht. And today on VO they repeated the video with the designer of the Ramka who is confident in the victory of his BMPT against the Armata
    And this video shows how rate of fire and visibility win
  15. 0
    21 June 2024 12: 25
    While someone has been sawing barbecues for many years, several modules have already been developed in Europe: in addition to the modules described in the article with a cannon and missiles for air defense at the platoon-company-battalion level, at the same exhibition they showed several modules for the roof of a tank with firearms and electronic warfare. At this rate, drones will predictably cease to be a super-weapon, as has always been the case in a spear-shield pair.
    Actually, the concept is obvious. The question is what the technological, production, financial and other capabilities are enough for: barbecues, electronic warfare boxes, 100500 different remote control missile systems or such modules.
  16. 0
    8 October 2024 19: 45
    Our T-55 and T-62 tanks can also be equipped with modules with a 57 mm cannon, 7,62 PKTM, ATGM and MANPADS, and terminators will not be needed.