Another rifle from the museum

9 020 22
Another rifle from the museum
The author with a Martini-Henry rifle designed for sport shooting. This is not a military model (there was already an article about this military model rifle on VO), so it is very elegantly finished and has some purely sporting improvements. Nevertheless, this rifle did not seem light to him at all, and holding it in his hands for a long time and at the same time aiming with it was quite difficult! Penza Regional Museum of Local Lore. Author's photo


“But seeing that we, terrible people, not afraid of his patented English Peabody and Martini rifle, kept climbing and climbing forward, he was horrified. When he wanted to leave, some little man, whom he could have killed with one blow of his black fist, jumped up and stuck a bayonet in his heart.”
"Four days". V. M. Garshin

stories about weapons. This rifle first entered service with the British Army in 1871, replacing the redesigned Snyder-Enfield system. After this, the Martini-Henry rifle was used throughout almost the entire territory of the British Empire for 47 long years. The rifle was a “hodgepodge”: the bolt was designed by Henry O. Peabody and improved by the Swiss gunsmith Friedrich von Martini, while the barrel with polygonal rifling of the original shape was developed by the Scotsman Alexander Henry. As happened very often, a special commission was created that tested a dozen and a half different rifles, first selected the barrel, and only then, having tested nine bolts along with it, settled on the design of Frederic Martini.




Martini-Henry rifle, model 1871, from the collection of the Army Museum in Stockholm

The original rifle fired a 0,452-inch soft lead hollow-base bullet with a conical head that was wrapped in paper tape, increasing its diameter from 0,460 to 0,469 inches. The powder charge was inside a cartridge made of thin brass foil with a rim, but later the cartridge case began to be made seamless. The cartridge case was lined with paper inside to prevent a chemical reaction between the black powder and the brass.


These are the bullets this rifle fired...


And these are cartridges for Martini-Henry rifles of different years of production. Photography by Jim Miles

Known today as the .577/450, this Boxer-design cartridge was loaded with 85 grains (5,51 g) of Curtis and Harvey No. 6 coarse black powder, known for its heavy recoil. The rifle was 49 inches (1245 mm) long, with a steel barrel measuring 33,22 inches (844 mm) long. Henry's patented rifling was heptagonal with seven grooves and one turn per 22 inches (559 mm). The rifle weighed 8 lb 7 oz (3,83 kg). There were two types of bayonets: dagger bayonets for non-commissioned officers and needle bayonets for privates. There was also a bayonet with a double row of teeth on the butt, which could be used as a saw. But it was not produced in large quantities and was not standard.


Trunk section

The Mk II Martini-Henry rifle was the most popular modification of the British army, adopted for service in 1877 and most actively used during the Zulu Wars. The sight's firing range was 1800 yards (1600 m). At 1200 yards (1100 m), 20 shots averaged 27 inches (69 cm) off target.


The rifle, which is in the collection of the Penza Regional Museum of Local Lore, is not a military weapon. This is a sporting example, as it has a beautiful “tiger” finish on the butt and stock, not found on military rifles. The fact that this is not a combat rifle, but a sports rifle for marksmanship, is indicated by the special design of the rear part of the butt and the absence of a firing pin cocking indicator on the right side of the bolt box. Penza Regional Museum of Local Lore. Author's photo

In 1879, the Mk III rifle, unified with the Martini-Henry carbine, was adopted for service. In the late 1870s, the British military decided to standardize ammunition for rifles and machine guns (both were .45 caliber, but were chambered for different cartridges), while the .577/.450 cartridges for the existing box magazines turned out to be inconvenient for machine guns.


Close-up of the same rifle. Right view


Bolt box and "sports stock". Left view

At the same time, in 1880, the development of a new cartridge with a lighter bullet of approximately 0,4 inch caliber began. In April 1886, a new version of the rifle was approved for it, designated “Enfield-Martini”. In total, more than 21 thousand of these rifles were produced, and a year later a new order was added to them. But even before it was completed, the decision was made to replace single-shot Martini-Henry rifles with bolt-action .303 Lee-Metford rifles - the same ones that Louis Boussenard satirized in his anti-British novel "Captain Rip your head off."


View of the open shutter

Consequently, in order to avoid the use of rifles of three different calibers, the Enfield-Martini rifles were discontinued, re-barreled in 0,45 caliber and called Martini-Henry Mk IV models "A", "B" and "C" " Some versions of the .0,303 black powder carbines, known as Martini-Metfords, and even .0,303 cordite carbines called Martini-Enfields (the former named for the action type and the latter for the rifling pattern) were also produced.


View of the receiver during reloading

During the Martini–Henry’s service life, the British Army fought in many colonial wars, most notably the Anglo-Zulu War in 1879. The rifle was used at the Battle of Isandlwana and also at the Battle of Rorke’s Drift, where 139 British soldiers successfully defended themselves against several thousand Zulus. During the Zulu War, the rifle had problems extracting cartridges, mainly due to the thin, weak foil-brass cases used. They expanded too much in the rifle’s chamber when fired, to the point that they ruptured inside the chamber. Controls artillery The British Army's Armaments Department found that the main causes of this problem were poorly designed rolled brass cartridges and contamination of the barrel and chamber with black powder residue. To fix this, the cartridge was replaced with a stronger one. And the MK-IV model of the rifle was given a longer reloading lever so that more force would be required to open the bolt in the event of contamination.

However, it was not until the 1920s, when smokeless nitro powder and copper-jacketed bullets were tested in these rifles, that accuracy and 100% reliability in removing cartridges was finally achieved. English hunters on various safaris, mainly in Africa, also found that the Martini, using a cordite charge and a 500 grain full metal jacket bullet, was effective in stopping even large animals such as hippopotamus at up to 80 yards. Cuno's nitro-based propellants in .577/450 brass Martini-Henry cases were used commercially well into the 1960s and have proven to be very reliable. And since the gunpowder is smokeless, the problem of contamination was solved.

The rifle remained popular as a sporting weapon for competitions organized by the National Rifle Association. From 1872 to 1904 it was used for shooting at ranges up to 1000 yards using standard ammunition of the time. But by 1904, more and more shooters began using the new .303 caliber, so interest in the .577/450 caliber dropped markedly.


Carbine based on the Martini-Henry rifle, model 1878. Auckland Museum, New Zealand

In addition to the rifle, there was the Martini-Henry carbine, introduced in 1878, which had less recoil and a smaller powder charge in the cartridges. The enemy was most confidently hit at a distance of up to 400 yards with both a rifle and a carbine. This was reflected in the tactics of their combat use. Thus, during most key battles, such as Rorke's Drift and the Battle of Ulundi, the order for volley fire was not given until the Zulus were at or within 400 yards, at which point Martini rifles would fire. -Henry” soldiers fired at the highest possible rate of fire.

Interestingly, unable to purchase Martini-Henry rifles from the British, since all the production of their factories was used to rearm the British troops, the Ottoman Empire bought weapons identical to the Mk I rifles from the Providence Tool Company in Providence, Rhode Island. USA (which produced a similar Peabody rifle), and used it effectively in the Russo-Turkish War of 1877-1878. In the Ottoman Empire, the rifle was called "Aynali Martin" and was even mentioned in several famous folk songs.


Romanian rifle "Martini-Henry" 1879 Army Museum, Stockholm

The Romanian Martini-Henry dates back to 1879, when Romania decided to replace its old Peabody Model 1867 rifles with new Martini-Henry rifles. Steyr received an order for 130 rifles, which were delivered to Romania in the early 000s. These rifles were also used during the First World War. Thus, on August 1880, 15, the Romanian army had 1916 rifles and 142 carbines of this system in service. A significant number of rifles were also produced for the Boer Republics, both in Belgium and by Westley Richards in Birmingham as early as the late 906s. As a result, Martini-Henry rifles were used by many Boers during the Second Boer War as over 8724 were purchased.


Then Martini-Henry rifles were manufactured for a long time by home-grown gunsmiths from the Tribal Zone in Pakistan. Often they were inlaid with mother-of-pearl like this...

The rifle and carbine were loved by the British and were produced until 1904, which was facilitated by both its simplicity and ease of use. The swinging bolt operated in a vertical plane, lowering and rising due to the pull down of the lever on the neck of the stock, which was not a continuation of the trigger guard, as was, for example, done on Winchester rifles. The lever, pulled down, lowered the bolt, the chamber opened and ejected the spent cartridge case. The cartridge was inserted into the chamber and chambered with a finger. After this, the lever rose along with the bolt and locked the chamber with the cartridge.

The rifle did not have a safety lock, but in order for the shooter to determine whether the firing pin was cocked or not, a special indicator lever was installed on the right side of the bolt box. There was also a small slide on the inside of the trigger guard, which could be pushed under the trigger, after which it was no longer possible to fire a shot.

Technical characteristics of the Martini-Henry rifle (1869)
Caliber 11,43 mm
Barrel length 889 mm
Rifling stroke 559 mm
Rifle length 1295 mm
Bullet diameter 11,56 mm
Bullet weight 31,1 g
Charge weight 5,5g
Cartridge weight 46,4 g
The rifle's rate of fire was determined to be 16 rounds per minute.
22 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. + 15
    23 June 2024 04: 26
    What I like about Vyacheslav Olegovich’s publications is that they are not politicized, detailed and well illustrated! good
    Although there are controversial issues. Quote:
    At 1200 yards (1100 m), 20 shots averaged 27 inches (69 cm) off target.
    This is a very good indicator even for modern rifles of 7,62X51 and 7,62X54 caliber. I doubt that such accuracy is possible when firing a cartridge with a blunt-nosed jacketless bullet loaded with black powder.
    Then Martini-Henry rifles were manufactured for a long time by home-grown gunsmiths from the Tribal Zone in Pakistan.

    In the 1980s, such rifles were often captured by servicemen of our "limited contingent" during village cleanups. But for the most part at that time they were used as hunting weapons, which was facilitated by the possibility of independently manufacturing ammunition.
    1. +8
      23 June 2024 05: 26
      I join Sergei’s kind words; I literally devoured the article. Thank you!
      R.s. Good day everyone!
      1. +7
        23 June 2024 06: 43
        Quote: Kote pane Kohanka
        literally devoured the article

        Oh, thanks! But when you yourself hold on to the weapon, it’s much easier to write... If the museum’s funds were completely at my service, that would be a “yes.” And so, in order to photograph the Mannlicher M1895 rifle, I will have to wait for the exhibition to change and the display case to open. And it’s not a fact that people will remember that they promised to invite me to this “ceremonial event”!
        1. +2
          23 June 2024 12: 56
          Thank you, Vyacheslav! good
          entered service with the British Army in 1871, replacing the Snyder-Enfield conversion system.

          Pictured is Snider-Enfield (UK)
    2. +2
      23 June 2024 09: 16
      I doubt that such accuracy is possible when firing a cartridge with a blunt-nosed jacketless bullet loaded with black powder.

      You have no reason to doubt it. Below is a scan of the photo"Table of ballistic data for a 4,2 line infantry rifle with a bayonet." from the 1884 Manual for Shooting Training.
      At 1400 steps, the standard deviation is 1 arshin and 5 vershoks (approximately 93 cm) vertically and 15,2 vershoks (approximately 68 cm) horizontally.
      1. +7
        23 June 2024 09: 27
        Quote from Frettaskyrandi
        You have no reason to doubt it. Below in the photo is a scan of the “Table of ballistic data for a 4,2 line infantry rifle with a bayonet.” from the 1884 Manual for Shooting Training.

        What you sent is not exactly the "average deviation".
        1. +2
          23 June 2024 11: 27
          Parameter
          standard deviation
          is used for evaluation even today. What's wrong with it? Where is or was "average deviation from the target center" used? There is "average radius of hit points Rср". I would like to see the original, since I suspect that the author translated it incorrectly.
    3. The comment was deleted.
    4. 0
      23 June 2024 16: 56
      Quote: Bongo
      What I like about Vyacheslav Olegovich’s publications is that they are not politicized, detailed and well illustrated! good
      Although there are controversial issues. Quote:
      At 1200 yards (1100 m), 20 shots averaged 27 inches (69 cm) off target.
      This is a very good indicator even for modern rifles of 7,62X51 and 7,62X54 caliber. I doubt that such accuracy is possible when firing a cartridge with a blunt-nosed jacketless bullet loaded with black powder.

      To be honest, I also doubt it, but on the other hand, it is the blunt-nosed bullet that shows the best results at subsonic speeds. However, all armies switched to pointed bullets simply because the initial speeds increased thanks to smokeless gunpowder, and besides, combat distances thanks to machine guns became no more than 500-600m. Also, the infantry switched to scattered battle formations and firing in volleys became pointless. And at distances less than 1000m, a pointed bullet is definitely better.
  2. +2
    23 June 2024 05: 30
    all the products of their factories went to the rearmament of British troops
    Not being strong in the production of small arms, I would still like to ask, how were such weapons produced? Was there already a well-established line production, something like a conveyor belt, or did production take place in a handicraft way in various workshops, but according to established drawings and pre-developed technologies?
    1. +5
      23 June 2024 06: 44
      Quote: Dutchman Michel
      Was there already a well-established line production, something like a conveyor belt, or did production take place in a handicraft way in various workshops, but according to established drawings and pre-developed technologies?

      Yes, it already happened. But at the same time, many manual operations remained, which, by the way, was characteristic of the Austrian military industry.
    2. +3
      23 June 2024 09: 48
      Was there already a well-established line production, something like a conveyor belt, or did production take place in a handicraft way in various workshops, but according to established drawings and pre-developed technologies?

      There are scans of albums of drawings from arms factories from those times on the Internet. So there are many times more drawings of devices and calibers for production than drawings of the weapon itself, practically one device for every manual operation.
      Still, you can’t make mass-produced weapons using handicraft methods, and it is unrealistic to bring the entire set of devices and calibers to every handicraft workshop.
      1. +1
        23 June 2024 10: 34
        It is unrealistic to bring the entire set of devices and calibers to every handicraft workshop
        Why bring any kits? Drawings and a step-by-step assembly description from the developer are enough, the rest is up to the manufacturer
        1. 0
          23 June 2024 11: 54
          Why bring any kits? Drawings and a step-by-step assembly description from the developer are enough, the rest is up to the manufacturer

          And the big problems of a soldier in war.
          No, military production works differently. And any production in general.
  3. +6
    23 June 2024 05: 51
    The original rifle fired a 0,452-inch soft lead hollow-base bullet with a tapered head that was wrapped in paper tape.

    Vyacheslav Olegovich, this form of bullet is called cylindrical-ogive. The generatrix of ogive-shaped bullets is the Karman ogive, hence the name.
  4. +4
    23 June 2024 06: 48
    [quote=Frettaskyrandi]cylinder-ogive. The ogival shape of the bullet is the Karmana ogive, hence the name.
    Naturally, I came across this name. But since in this case, as often happens, there was a translation, I did not change anything, so as not to make a mistake even by accident. There is also a cylindrical-conical shape...
  5. +5
    23 June 2024 07: 21
    Film "Zulu" 1964, at the end of the video there is a close-up of loading and removing the cartridge case
    1. +8
      23 June 2024 10: 16
      Good film! good
      True, it contains carbines that have already been converted for more modern ammunition with a small-pointed bullet.
      Which, of course, cannot be considered a disadvantage. winked
  6. +6
    23 June 2024 09: 53
    The morning should simply begin with coffee and an article by dear Vyacheslav, we should already oblige VO, since they can’t have coffee, then the article is a must
    1. +4
      23 June 2024 19: 29
      The morning should simply begin with coffee and an article by dear Vyacheslav, we should already oblige VO, since they can’t have coffee, then the article is a must

      I support it, although now I’m drinking beer and waiting for meat!
  7. +1
    23 June 2024 22: 56
    Not an advertisement for the channel.... I already brought videos from there... here's a review of it (this is Prague, Czech Republic) In general, I didn't manage to go... I'm stuck with my knee for a long time now sad recourse
    Z.Y, Vyacheslav fellow hi
  8. +1
    24 June 2024 00: 07
    Cuno's nitro-based propellants in .577/450 brass Martini-Henry cases were used commercially well into the 1960s and have proven to be very reliable.

    The manufacturer is most likely not “Kuno”, but “Kynoch”.
  9. 0
    24 June 2024 23: 00
    the MK-IV rifle model had a longer reloading lever, so that in case of contamination, more force was required to open the bolt.

    Instead of "that" most likely meant "since"
    I was struck by an interesting detail - the cross-section of the trunk in the form of a polygon.
    For what ? There must be a good reason, because the greater complexity of such cutting is obvious - after drilling, more metal must be removed.