Roman Emperor Tzimiskes against the Kyiv Prince Svyatoslav

43
Roman Emperor Tzimiskes against the Kyiv Prince Svyatoslav
Reconstruction of the face of Tzimiskes on a silk Byzantine tapestry brought from Constantinople in the 12th century by Bishop Gunther of Bamberg


В previous article it was told about the origin and youth of John Tzimiskes and the circumstances of his accession to the throne. Today we will continue this story.



Having ascended the throne, John discovered that things in the empire, to put it mildly, were not very brilliant. For the third year in a row, the country experienced poor harvests. The Arabs were preparing for a new war, in which they hoped to regain lost cities and lands. And in the north, a new formidable enemy suddenly appeared - the young Kiev prince Svyatoslav.

The rash decision of Nikephoros Phocas


As often happens, the Romans themselves called on the future enemy for help. Svyatoslav, in their opinion, should have struck at the Bulgarians, who were then receiving tribute from the Romans. In 966, Nicephorus Phokas decided to put an end to this and, in order to tie the Bulgarians’ hands with war, sent the patrician Kalokir, the son of the strategist of Chersonesus, to Kyiv to recruit new allies. Kavlokir brought a fairly large amount of gold - 15 centinarii, that is, 108 thousand coins. However, the envoy of Nikephoros “exceeded” the assignment - he fraternized with Svyatoslav and, it seems, agreed with him on selfless assistance in the capture of Constantinople, the throne of which was to go to Kalokir. The Hungarians and some Pecheneg tribes also acted as allies of the Russian prince.

The outbreak of war


Svyatoslav approached the mouth of the Danube, where he defeated the army of the Bulgarians who opposed him, after which he took possession of many fortresses. He liked the new lands - so much that, according to the chronicler’s report, he then said:

“I don’t like to sit in Kyiv, I want to live in Pereyaslavets on the Danube - for there is the middle of my land, all the blessings flock there: gold, pavolok, wine, various fruits from the Greek land; from the Czech Republic and from Hungary silver and horses; From Rus' there are furs and wax, honey and slaves.”

Some of the Bulgarians entered into an agreement with Svyatoslav, others sought help from the Romans. Tzimiskes tried to negotiate, but his ambassadors did not achieve success. After this, John and Svyatoslav exchanged threatening letters. The Emperor wrote:

“If you do not leave the country yourself, then we will expel you from it against your will. I believe that you have not forgotten about the defeat of your father Ingor, who, despising the oath agreement, sailed to our capital with a huge army on 10 thousand ships, and arrived at the Cimmerian Bosporus with barely a dozen boats, becoming the messenger of his own misfortune. I don’t even mention his pitiful fate when, having gone on a campaign against the Germans, he was captured by them, tied to tree trunks and torn in two. I think that you will not return to your fatherland if you force the Roman force to come out against you - you will find death here with your entire army, and not a single torchbearer will arrive in Scythia to announce the terrible fate that has befallen you.”

Svyatoslav replied:

“I see no need for the Roman Emperor to rush to us; let him not exhaust his strength on the journey to this country - we ourselves will soon pitch our tents at the gates of Byzantium and erect strong barriers around the city, and if he comes to us, if he decides to confront such a misfortune, we will bravely meet him and show him in practice , that we are not some artisans who earn a living by the labor of our hands, but men of blood who weapons defeat the enemy. In vain, out of his unreasonableness, he mistakes the Russians for pampered women and tries to intimidate us with similar threats, like infants who are frightened with all sorts of scarecrows.”

Constantinople was gripped by anxiety. The epitaph addressed to Nikephoros Phocas, which was written by John the Geometer in the spring of 970, is characteristic. In it, he called on the murdered emperor to rise from the grave and defend the capital or accept all its inhabitants into his grave.

However, Tzimiskes was also a very good commander. In preparation for decisive battles with aliens from the north, he, in particular, created a new guards unit of 500 heavily armed horsemen (cataphracts), which was called “Immortals” (perhaps by analogy with a similar unit of the Persian king Darius). This detachment included the best warriors who received armor decorated with gold and silver - their armor literally shone in the sun, which made a great impression on both the enemies and the Romans themselves. In Thrace, two experienced commanders gathered troops - Master Varda Sklir and Patrick Peter. In the east at this time, Patrick Nicholas led the remaining troops.

Already in 970, the first clashes between Russians and Romans took place. At first, Peter managed to defeat the advanced detachments of Svyatoslav, but then his army suffered a crushing defeat. The name of this patrician is not mentioned anywhere else - perhaps he died in battle.


B. Chorikov. Svyatoslav in the battle with the Greeks near Adrianople

Another detachment of Rus near Arkadiopolis entered into battle with the army of Varda Sklir. In Byzantine sources there is a description of this battle:

“Varda divided the phalanx into three parts and ordered one of them to follow directly behind him in the center, and the other two to hide to the side, in the forests, and jump out of ambush as soon as they heard a trumpet sound calling for battle... From both The bravest warriors died on both sides. And then, they say, some Scythian, boasting of his strength and the might of his body, rushed forward from the phalanx of horsemen surrounding him, galloped up to Varda and struck him on the helmet with his sword. But the blow was unsuccessful: the blade of the sword, hitting the hardness of the helmet, bent and slid to the side. Then Patrik Constantine, Varda’s brother, a young man who barely had any down on his chin, but who was of enormous height and invincible, irresistible strength, drew his sword and attacked the Scythian. He was afraid of Konstantin’s onslaught and dodged the blow, leaning back on the horse’s croup. The blow hit the horse's neck, and his head flew to the side; The Scythian collapsed along with his horse to the ground and was stabbed to death by Constantine... The impermanence of happiness passed uncontrollably from one side to the other, Varda ordered a military muster to be blown and the tympanums to be beaten frequently. At this sign, the phalanx hidden in ambush rose up and rushed at the Scythians from the rear: gripped by fear, they began to incline to flee. However, at a time when the retreat had just begun, some noble Scythian, superior to the other warriors in his great height and brilliance of armor, moving through the space between the two armies, began to arouse courage in his comrades. Varda Sklir ran up to him and hit him on the head so hard that the sword penetrated to the waist; the helmet could not protect the Scythian, the shell could not withstand the strength of the hand and the devastating effect of the sword. He fell to the ground, cut in two; The Romans perked up and filled the air with joyful cries. The Scythians were horrified by this amazing, supernatural blow; they screamed, broke their formation and fled. Until late in the evening the Romans pursued them and mercilessly exterminated them.”


Persecution of Russians by the Byzantines, miniature of the “Madrid Manuscript” of Skylitzes

Tzimisces at this time was gathering troops of Anatolian themes, which came to Thrace in the spring of 971.

Revolt of Bardas Phocas


Meanwhile, in Caesarea (the modern Turkish city of Kayseri), the nephew of the murdered emperor, Bardas Phocas, tried to rebel. Mikhail Psell wrote about him:

“And this husband, as the historian says, was similar in character to his uncle the emperor: always anxious and wary, he knew how to foresee and see everything, was skilled in military tricks, experienced in various kinds of attacks, ambushes and open battles. In battles, he was more decisive and courageous than Skler. The enemy wounded by him immediately gave up the ghost, and with one battle cry he confused the entire phalanx.”

Tzimisces entered into negotiations, promising forgiveness and the preservation of all the possessions of the rebels, but Bardas Phocas did not even respond to his letter. It was necessary to recall Varda Skler from Thrace, whose brother, the same Constantine, was married to the sister of the rebel. The emperor, who completely trusted Skler, hoped that he would be able to come to an agreement with his relative. Bardas Skleros sent spies to the enemy camp, who quickly propagated the army of Phocas' supporters, so that he soon had no more than 300 soldiers loyal to him. With them he went to the fortress of the Tyrants, in which he then surrendered to the mercy of the winner, was tonsured a monk and exiled to the island of Chios. But the emperor ordered the soldiers accompanying him to gouge out their eyes.

Continuation of the war in Bulgaria


Meanwhile, John Kurkuas (grandson of the good commander about whom we spoke in previous article), did nothing, ceasing all attempts to counteract Svyatoslav's troops, which were ravaging Thrace and Macedonia. And Emperor John Tzimiskes celebrated a new marriage all winter (with the daughter of Constantine Porphyrogenitus Theodora), which was concluded on November 3, 970. This wedding was supposed to strengthen John's position as emperor. He set out on a campaign in April 971. At that time, Svyatoslav's army was divided into two parts, the first of which, under the command of the governor Sfenkel, was in Preslav, the second, commanded by the prince himself, was in Dorostol (later this city was called Silistria). According to modern researchers, the forces of the opponents were approximately equal - about 28 thousand soldiers on each side. But, as already noted, the two Russian armies were located at a distance of about 14 km from each other. At the same time, Svyatoslav, confident in his strength, did not take measures to protect the passes in the Balkan Mountains. But 160 years ago, in the Vyrbish Pass, already returning from the burnt Pliska, surrounded by the Bulgarians, Emperor Nicephorus I died along with his entire army. Tzimiskes declared to his subordinates:

“I myself know that carelessness and willful insolence in battles usually lead to the greatest danger and irreparable disaster... however, we should act decisively and make the best use of the circumstances... while the Scythians are still inactive and do not suspect our arrival, we will take advantage convenient opportunity. Victory awaits us after we pass through the mountain passes. But if they discover our intention to cross the gorge and line up their army there against us, things will not end well, then a terrible disaster will await us, our situation will become hopeless. Cheer up your spirit, remember that you are Romans, who used to put any enemy to flight with their weapons! Follow me as quickly as possible and show your courage in action!”

In just four days (from April 9 to April 12), Tzimiskes' army covered 180 kilometers and reached the capital of Bulgaria - the city of Preslav, which was taken by storm just 2 days later.


The Romans storm Preslav

The Bulgarian Tsar was captured, the treasury of the kingdom was captured, about 7 thousand Russians died, Patrick Kalokir fled to Svyatoslav in advance with the news of the approach of the imperial army.

On April 18, Tzimiskes led the army to Dorostol, where Svyatoslav was located - and the numerical advantage was now on the side of the Romans. Nevertheless, Svyatoslav decided not to hide behind the walls of the fortress, but to give battle in the field - about 18 km from Dorostol. Lev Deacon writes:

“The Tauro-Scythians tightly closed their shields and spears, giving their ranks the appearance of a wall, and awaited the enemy on the battlefield. The emperor lined up the Romans against them, placing armored horsemen on the sides, and archers and slingers behind, and, ordering them to shoot non-stop, led the phalanx into battle.”


The battle between the Russians and the Byzantines at the reconstruction of M. Gorelik

At the decisive moment, Tzimiskes sent cataphracts to attack, who crushed the formation of Svyatoslav’s soldiers, and the prince was forced to retreat to Dorostol. The Romans, apparently, were so tired of the battle that they could not organize a full-fledged pursuit - otherwise the entire army of Svyatoslav would have been destroyed on the way to Dorostol.

“Having offered prayers to the victorious martyr George for the victory (for the clash with the enemies took place on the day dedicated to his memory), the next day the emperor himself moved to Dorostol and, once there, began to strengthen the camp.”

On April 25, the siege of Dorostol began, during which the Rus often left the city for small skirmishes with the Romans. Meanwhile, Roman warships approached Dorostol, including flamethrower dromons, which blocked the fortress from the river.


John Tzimiskes at the walls of Dorostol. Miniature from a Vatican manuscript of the 14th century.

Skylitsa claims that, fearing the betrayal of the Bulgarians, Svyatoslav executed about 300 "the famous Misyans for their birth and wealth", and Tzimiskes suggested that he resolve the matter by duel:

“He did not accept the challenge and added mocking words that he, supposedly, understands his own benefit better than the enemy, and if the emperor does not want to live anymore, then there are tens of thousands of other ways to death; let him choose whichever he wants.”

During the Russian raid on July 18, the above-mentioned Master John Kurkuas was killed, whom the Russians mistook for the emperor because of his rich armor. Inspired by this success, the next day Svyatoslav again led the army outside the walls, but this time it was not possible to break the blockade, but the Russian governor Ikmor, who is called the second man in the army, died. Lev Deacon describes the burial ceremony of the fallen Rus:

“When night fell and the full circle of the moon shone, the Scythians came out onto the plain and began to pick up their dead. They piled them up in front of the wall, made many fires and burned them, slaughtering many captives, men and women, according to the custom of their ancestors. Having made this bloody sacrifice, they strangled (several) infants and roosters, drowning them in the waters of the Ister.”


Henryk Semiradsky. “Night Sacrifice” (“Trison of Svyatoslav’s warriors after the battle near Dorostol in 971”)

And further:

“They say that the Scythians venerate the mysteries of the Hellenes, make sacrifices according to pagan rites and pour out libations for the dead, having learned this either from their philosophers Anacharsis and Zamolxis, or from the companions of Achilles. After all, Arrian writes in his “Description of the Seashore” that Peleus’ son Achilles was a Scythian and came from a town called Myrmikion, located near Lake Maeotis (Sea of ​​Azov). Expelled by the Scythians for his wild, cruel and insolent disposition, he subsequently settled in Thessaly. Clear evidence (of the Scythian origin of Achilles) is the cut of his cape, fastened with a clasp, the habit of fighting on foot, blond hair, light blue eyes, extravagant irritability and cruelty.”

At the council of the remaining Russian commanders, which met the next day, opinions were divided. Some suggested breaking through on ships, but there was a high risk that they would be burned by the Roman dromons. And therefore, some of the commanders insisted on negotiations with the emperor. But Svyatoslav, as you know, decided to give another battle, it was then that he uttered the famous phrase:

“The dead have no shame.”

On that day, the Roman warrior Anemas, who had previously defeated Ikmor, died:

“Anemas was surrounded by rows of Scythians, his horse fell, struck by a cloud of spears; He killed many of them, but he himself died - a husband whom none of his peers could surpass in military exploits.”

At some point, it seemed that victory was leaning towards the Russians - and then the emperor himself led the attack of the “immortals”. Later, a legend arose that in front of this detachment many saw an unknown rider on a white horse, who was declared the patron saint of warriors, Theodore Tyrone, who came to the aid of Christians.


Saint Theodore Tyrone on a 15th century Cretan icon. According to the apocrypha “The Tale of the Exploits of Fyodor Tirinin”, this saint was also a snake fighter

The Russians were forced to retreat.

In the next article we will continue the story about the war between John Tzimiskes and Svyatoslav, talk about the diplomatic successes of this emperor in Italy, two successful campaigns in the East and unexpected death.
43 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. 0
    17 June 2024 05: 06
    Quote: Ryzhov V. A.
    Svyatoslav approached the mouth of the Danube, where he defeated the army of Bulgarians who opposed him
    What has always been interesting to me during this historical period is whether the Bulgarians already considered themselves Slavs (they had just recently converted to Orthodoxy) or did they still remain Turks? And what language did they speak? And wasn’t this a long-standing enmity between the conditional descendants of the Polovtsians (Bulgarians) and the Pechenegs who came with Svyatoslav?
    1. -1
      17 June 2024 18: 41
      "Glorify the Bulgarian people." They considered everything as Slavs. And how did Russia define it in those times? Slavic or Varangian Derzhava?
      1. 0
        17 June 2024 20: 26
        "Glorify the Bulgarian people." They considered everything as Slavs. And how did Russia define it in those times? Slavic or Varangian Derzhava?
        Write in Russian
        1. 0
          18 June 2024 22: 51
          And so it is clear that the Bulgarians were already more Slavs than Turks, but the Russians were still more Varangians than Slavs.
          1. +1
            19 June 2024 05: 06
            And so it is clear that the Bulgarians were already more Slavs than Turks
            By what signs is this clear?
        2. -1
          2 August 2024 07: 58
          Here is a quote from the message of Tzimiskes:
          I think that you will not return to your fatherland if you force the Roman force to come out against you - you will find death here with your entire army, and not a single torchbearer will arrive in Scythia to announce the terrible fate that has befallen you.

          In his opinion, Kyiv is Scythia.
          On the famous map of Fra Mauro from 1450. Russia - Sarmatia. Russia/Sarmatia in both Europe and Asia.
          The name of the country changed, but the essence remained.
          Kyiv was part of Scythia - Sarmatia - Russia.
          And the Varangians are not Scandinavian tribes, but from the southern coast of the Baltic.
          Yes, Rurik on his father’s side had haplogroup N1, but on his mother’s side he was the grandson of Gostomysl. And what?
          England is still ruled by the Hanoverian dynasty. Which had nothing to do with England. And no one gives a damn.
          1. +2
            2 August 2024 08: 05
            In his opinion, Kyiv - Scythia
            For the Greeks, everything east of the Balkans was considered Scythia. And they didn’t particularly bother with the ethnic origin of those living there
            And the Varangians are not Scandinavian tribes, but from the southern coast of the Baltic
            The Varangians included many peoples, but their backbone was still the Scandinavians
            Yes, Rurik had haplogroup N1 on his father’s side, but on his mother’s side he was the grandson of Gostomysl
            This is very controversial. And even slightly smacks of alternative history wink
            1. -1
              2 August 2024 08: 13
              DNA genealogy has long been a science.
              Varangians are a vague concept. It's not clear what this even is.

              For the Greeks, everything east of the Balkans was considered Scythia

              Well, yes, then it was called Sarmatia, Russia. .I mentioned Fra Mauro's map. This is a real map. The truth is old, the south is at the top, but you can figure it out. It clearly states that Sarmatia=Russia. In Europe and Asia. No one disputes the reality of this map. There's a lot of interesting stuff there.
              1. +1
                2 August 2024 10: 43
                DNA genealogy has long been a science
                Science, but the remains of Rubrik have not been found to this day, and all the so-called. “Rurikovichs” can have very different degrees of kinship. Even on the female side
                Varangians are a vague concept. It's not clear what this even is
                Varangians - in Russian transcription, Vikings. In Rus' there were people from Eastern Sweden, who were called Varangians
                It clearly states that Sarmatia=Russia
                At that time there was no Russia yet. In the Greek understanding, these lands were called Scythia, in medieval Europe it was Tartary
                1. 0
                  2 August 2024 11: 08
                  Science, but the remains of Rubrik have not been found to this day, and all the so-called. “Rurikovichs” can have very different degrees of kinship. Even on the female side

                  They checked all the way to the son of Alexander Nevsky. The Y chromosome is passed on only through the male line. The Rurikovichs have either R1a or N1. The Swedes have very few of these groups. There's either I1 or R1b.
                  There are many versions of the Varangians.
                  Fra Mauro's map specifically says: SARMATIA OVER RUSSIA. In general, there is no Rus' on the maps. RUSSIA everywhere.
                  I would send you a link to Fra Mauro, but they will throw it away.
                  There are literally over 100 thousand old maps on David Ramsey's website. When you look at them, your attitude towards official history changes greatly.
                  And life has taught me to work from a document.
                  Ramsey is a billionaire with a passion for collecting cards.
                  I can send you a private message, it might last longer there.
                2. 0
                  2 August 2024 11: 09
                  Look. I sent it in a private message.
  2. -1
    17 June 2024 08: 10
    Many thanks to the Author for an interesting story.

    Judging by the quotes, Svyatoslav had a certain sense of humor and an immense sense of superiority.
    1. 0
      17 June 2024 08: 37
      All these quotes were invented by chroniclers, but rather taken from some ancient works.
      1. +3
        17 June 2024 08: 57
        Did ancient authors take these quotes from Neanderthal rock inscriptions?
        1. +2
          17 June 2024 09: 10
          No, they themselves composed rhetoric and taught them, and in the Middle Ages it was considered chic to write an entire book from quotes.
          The description of Svyatoslav by Leo the Deacon is the same as Attila by Priscus of Panius.
          1. 0
            17 June 2024 09: 24
            Well, in the USSR it was also obligatory to insert quotes from the "classics of Marxism-Leninism". But if the same Leo the Deacon inserted not just any quotes, but suitable ones (close in meaning to his work) from Priscus, then it was okay.
            1. +1
              17 June 2024 09: 27
              I’m not saying this is good or bad, although it would be better if they gave the real names of the tribes and lands, and not just any Tauro-Scythians
              1. +1
                18 June 2024 18: 52
                Quote: Cartalon
                the real names of tribes and lands were given, and not just any Tauro-Scythians

                Well, Americans and Russians consider them Russians, and not Tatars, Bashkirs and other nationalities that are part of Russia.
  3. +1
    17 June 2024 08: 56
    Svyatoslav clearly overestimated his strength, which was still incomparable with the forces of the Empire. And he was a bad politician. It was necessary to accumulate forces and wait for the opportune moment when a less experienced and skillful commander would be at the head of Byzantium.
    1. +3
      17 June 2024 09: 25
      He needed to feed his squad, for this he had to rob someone, Igor couldn’t do it for strangers, he had to do it with his own.
      1. +1
        17 June 2024 09: 32
        But this reminds me of modern realities
  4. +2
    17 June 2024 08: 59
    But how should we feel about Svyatoslav’s refusal to fight with Tzimiskes? On the one hand, it seems like cowardice? On the other hand, forethought? What if “the leg moves”? Or will the Byzantines be deceived? If Tzimiskes wins, they will demand to admit defeat; if they lose, will they still continue the war?
  5. +1
    17 June 2024 10: 17
    I don’t even mention his pitiful fate when, having gone on a campaign to Germans, he was taken prisoner by them, tied to tree trunks and torn in two.

    This is how Igor died...
    1. +2
      17 June 2024 11: 54
      This is how Igor died...
      Damn Germans... laughing Although these were Drevlyans... let them be Germans, the author knows better.
      1. VLR
        +2
        17 June 2024 12: 04
        let them be Germans, the author knows best.

        Do you mean Leo the Deacon? This is a quote from his "History" (and highlighted as a quote in the text of the article).
        1. +1
          17 June 2024 12: 06
          Of course, the Slavs did not even raise their hands to such atrocity...
      2. +3
        17 June 2024 12: 15
        I suppose the Romans were not interested in the details. Basically, let them. Well at least they’re not dog heads)))
        1. +1
          17 June 2024 12: 29
          Well at least they’re not dog heads)))
          good laughing
  6. +2
    17 June 2024 10: 27
    The author - well, Svyatoslav could not have had such powers by definition. Well, no way. At most, up to 10-12 thousand people of the Slavic tribal association under different leadership and mercenaries (the same Hungarians, Pechenegs, Yasses, Kasogs and other tribes of the Great Steppe), local allies. This is at its peak.
    Thanks to 40 years of archaeological research in Silistra, we already know for sure that around the middle of the 5th century, the fortress of Dristra occupied an area of ​​3 hectares. How more than 7-8 thousand soldiers could be accommodated there for XNUMX months, I do not know. And there were probably local residents, nobility, animals for food and war horses. And this is a very tender animal that will not live long in poor conditions. Within the fortress there were massive buildings, a cathedral, residences, a place was needed to store food and loot.
    Based on reality, 6–7 thousand soldiers is the critical maximum that could fit on the territory of the Dristra fortress. For a very short period of time, otherwise illness, hunger, and discontent are guaranteed. This fully corresponds to the statement of the ancient Russian Ipatiev Chronicle that Svyatoslav (in his own words) went on a second campaign against Bulgaria with 10000 soldiers. Surely he could have gathered no more than 5-6 thousand people in the Rus' of that time (there was no talk of a full-fledged state yet!). You need to understand that the warrior of that time was not a warrior of the late 13th century before the Mongol invasion. These are overwhelmingly foot, lightly armed warriors without heavy armor or no armor at all.
    The forces at the disposal of John Tzimiskes are known with absolute certainty. They were reported by Leo the Deacon, Skylitzes and others. Literally - "John Tzimiskes went to Bulgaria in the spring of 971 with 5000 foot soldiers and 4000 horsemen. Emperor John Tzimiskes went to Dristra with the strongest army that Byzantium had in the glorious 971th century: the terrifying "fire-bearing triremes" (more precisely dromons), the corps of "immortals" and the Asia Minor tagmas, famous for their unprecedented victories over the Arabs before and after the battle of 20." Apparently the total forces were about XNUMX thousand professional army and navy.
    What does this mean? Apparently the threat was so serious that the empire was forced to send against Svyatoslav the best troops that had recently fought against the Arabs. And yet, after a series of fairly successful battles, they were forced to come to an agreement and even pay off.
    The result - Svyatoslav, without allies, was forced to leave Bulgaria by sea back to Rus'. Apparently the losses were catastrophic, many military leaders died. Were his sons waiting for him in Rus'? Hardly.
    The steppe mercenaries left earlier or went parallel to the sea. In any case, Svyatoslav had some horses left. Sveneld, as we know, came to Kyiv on horseback with several companions. Svyatoslav refused to abandon the rest of the army and the spoils. And he died with the remaining warriors in the early spring during the second attempt to pass the rapids. All the Bulgarian spoils went to the Pechenegs. Who were warned either by the Byzantines or by Svyatoslav's recent allies who had returned. In any case, Svyatoslav's fatal miscalculation and overconfidence cost him and his warriors their lives.
    There must have been very few of them left in the spring after a hungry winter, and the prey was very attractive, which is why the local steppe inhabitants decided.
    With the departure of Svyatoslav, the Byzantines subjugated Bulgaria.
  7. +4
    17 June 2024 15: 23
    “When night fell and the full circle of the moon shone, the Scythians came out onto the plain and began to pick up their dead. They piled them up in front of the wall, made many fires and burned them, slaughtering many captives, men and women, according to the custom of their ancestors. Having made this bloody sacrifice, they strangled (several) infants and roosters, drowning them in the waters of the Ister.”
    Directly hit the balls of the local neo-pagan dolboslavs with a sickle. Respect to the author Yes
    1. +1
      17 June 2024 22: 10
      For example, in honor of Nikola the water (sea), belated travelers in the winter were thrown into an ice hole, and even during a storm they cast lots for who should go to the king of the sea. Sadko fell out and he obviously didn’t really want to, but he had to.
      Sacrifices were common practice in those days among many peoples. Many rituals required sacrifices. For example, one wife of the deceased, it seems by lot, was given drink, then strangled and burned with the deceased (the Arabs described). The Baltic autochthons, they really did have some cults similar to the Hellenistic ones. All this still needs to be researched, of course. And apparently many saints and holidays in paganism and Christianity were intertwined.
      So what? Why should this make the Slavic neo-pagans feel worse? Do they position themselves as “tender lambs”?
      Faith evolves, rituals change and now times have changed.
      Although we are Orthodox now, our ancestors lived this way and you need to know about this and should not be ashamed of your history.
      1. +1
        18 June 2024 08: 01
        Quote: awdrgy
        Why should this make the Slavic neo-pagans feel worse? Do they position themselves as “tender lambs”?
        Because they claim that it was Christians who tortured people (burned, tortured, etc.), and before them everyone lived in harmony - well, the Slavic tribes, of course, with the “decaying West” everything is clear
        1. 0
          18 June 2024 08: 36
          Well, this is the grassroots level... that mass that does not understand the meaning and purpose of Slavic neo-paganism, although it participates in it indirectly. People need to be attracted. Women are needed to increase their numbers, so we have to tell them fairy tales about flowers and candy wrappers. Where to get people? You can't leave Islam, you can only leave Christians. That’s why such topics are brought up. It `s naturally.
  8. 0
    17 June 2024 15: 47
    Quote: Stirbjorn
    Directly hit the balls of the local neo-pagan dolboslavs with a sickle. Respect to the author

    Don’t you think that this is part of Christian propaganda, to slander paganism and convert even more potential paying clients to your faith?
    1. +1
      18 June 2024 08: 05
      Quote: Konnick
      Don’t you think that this is part of Christian propaganda, to slander paganism and convert even more potential paying clients to your faith?
      I don’t know, for me it’s all the same, in terms of money scams, so I’ll only donate for the treatment of the children. hi
  9. +2
    17 June 2024 23: 17
    After Oleg, there were two successive not very successful reigns of Ancient Rus' - Igor and Svyatoslav.
    But Vladimir, who was illegal on all sides, did better; he turned out to have a more statesmanlike mind.
    No, his morals and ethics were at least not higher, even though he is now a Christian saint. But his state instinct and luck are something that can still be credited to him as the builder of Rus'.
  10. 0
    18 June 2024 08: 54
    The author cites only the opinion of the Byzantine chronicler, and ignores the Russian chronicles, apparently considering them not worthy of mention, the information provided in them. And there, just the reason for the "frivolity" of Svyatoslav is visible - he did not block the passes, the Romans were defeated near Adrianople and peace or a truce was concluded between Svyatoslav and Tzimiskes. Possibly with the kissing of the cross, that is, Tzimiskes, having started a new round, violated the peace and the kissing of the cross, which was a surprise for Svyatoslav - his mother Olga was a Christian and Svyatoslav knew that breaking the kissing of the cross is a mortal sin and he can be accused of excessive trust in the oath of the Romans - forgetting that to trust Christians is not to respect oneself. Moreover, there was a clever loophole for the Romans, like the Russians are not Christians and the word given to them can be broken.
    And Svyatoslav, Sveneld was supposed to bring reinforcements in the spring for a new blow to Byzantium, but did not do so. And who knows, maybe the Pechenegs were notified not by the Romans, but by Veneld’s people about the route and the forces remaining with Svyatoslav? Kurya was too knowledgeable, after all, Svyatoslav is not a merchant, but a great warrior and he can lead his army at once, this Kurya knew better than anyone else. And only a traitor could give reliable information about the true state of affairs of Svyatoslav. So that the Pechenegs know with whom, in what quantity and where to wait for Svyatoslav. Well, Svyatoslav had to not neglect his land. The war with the Romans, for something that cannot be held, is pointless.
    1. 0
      18 June 2024 19: 08
      Quote: Khibiny Plastun
      Well, Svyatoslav had to not neglect his land. The war with the Romans, for something that cannot be held, is pointless.

      Before the war with the Bulgarians, Svyatoslav took Sarkel, battered the Khazars, the Ugrians, so he probably knew his strength. He divided the army - that was his strategic mistake. In addition, during the battle, the Polovtsians attacked Kyiv and besieged it, and part of the forces had to be returned back. In addition, the Bulgarians were by no means weaklings, before that they had fought with Byzantium for a long time with varying success, their army was strong. And the fact that the Rus defeated them speaks of the strength of Svyatoslav's army.
      1. +1
        18 June 2024 21: 38
        I wrote about the senseless war with the Romans over Bulgaria. It was necessary to digest what I had bitten off earlier - the Khazar lands. And so he defeated the Khazars for the Polovtsians (Kyiv was besieged by the Pechenegs, the Polovtsians came later), for Rus' his campaigns did not bring any benefit - only the death of thousands of men. It turns out that Svyatoslav even defeated Khazaria for the Polovtsians, opening the way for them to the Black Sea steppes, but not for Rus' - having wasted his forces in the war with Byzantium. Rus' received nothing from this war except losses. It seems that Svyatoslav really was not a strategist, like his son Vladimir, but was a konung - war for the sake of war. Then it is clear why they did not want to rescue him - he did not like Kyiv, he uses Rus' as a barracks for distant campaigns alien to the interests of the first people - the final station of the route "From the Varangians - to the Greeks" was closed for several years. So, I’m not sure – if Svyatoslav had made it to Kyiv, would they have been glad to see him there?
  11. +1
    18 June 2024 18: 56
    By the way, some vague time frames and information about age in the Oleg-Igor-Svyatoslav chain. There is a theory that there was, however, another Oleg (called Oleg II), who at the beginning of the 10th century had a series of military campaigns, but was called to reign in Moravia to fight the then pressing Hungarians, which delayed the fall of Moravia (Muravia), after which detachments of refugees and remnants of defeated squads returned to Rus'.
    Even the epic hero Ilya, according to some sources, Murovets, suddenly appeared in Rus' as a famous warrior at the age of 33.
  12. 0
    23 August 2024 11: 41
    So these wars began, back in the days of the Vizard's campaigns. Yes, in those wars the Scythians were so evil that they even tore the skin off the Byzantines and burned it.
  13. +1
    23 August 2024 11: 49
    .
    We must also mention Mithridates.
    This word can be two-part Mithra is the sun and Dat is the god of the underworld. Mithridates and Getae are one people that the Romans and then the Romans wanted to destroy.
  14. 0
    23 November 2024 00: 25
    In short, the barbarians lost.
    The Bulgarians split off from the Avar Khaganate, at that time they were still nomads. It is funny to consider genealogy by DNA, they roamed from Thrace to the Caucasus, the peoples were constantly mixing.
    Studying the DNA of ancient Russians is a dubious undertaking; the people had a custom of cremation.