Combat unmanned ground apparatus Ripsaw-MS2

30

Most unmanned ground vehicle (UAV) developers use vehicles that move rather slowly and require relatively complex control, as well as lack effective 360-degree situational awareness. As a result, the enemy can quite easily maneuver faster than them and even neutralize them by coming very close to the BNA. The US Army is eyeing a much larger, more powerful, flexible and deadly work developed by Howe & Howe (H&H), known as "RipSaw Military Specification 2", provides many benefits that minimize this vulnerability. The Ripsaw-MS2 is being tested as a convoy guard and combat support vehicle.







Unmanned tracked vehicle RipSaw Military Spec 1 (MS1) is a test platform for testing advanced off-road capabilities. His ability to move quickly off-road caused the army to be interested in using him as a guardian angel of convoys. The device is able to move quickly with the column, without hindering the movement of the column itself, quickly examine the places of possible placement of the VCA or respond to the enemy’s fire from ambushes, suppress the sources of this fire, or tow vehicles that are stuck from the line of fire. Not so long ago, Ripsaw-MS1 demonstrated such capabilities during Robotics Rodeo at Fort Hood. In addition to the mission of protecting convoys, Ripsaw is able to perform other potential tasks, including perimeter defense, guarding, rescue, border patrolling, riot control and ammunition disposal.





Ripsaw uses multiple cameras to obtain a continuous circular (360 degrees) review, thereby providing the operator with "always" full situational awareness. In addition, the device is large enough that it is capable of carrying out so much effective perimeter protection so as not to let anyone get close. This active self-defense system uses modular ammunition selection control.
"Crowd Controls" M5 (Modular Crowd Control Munitions, MCCM) installed around the perimeter of the machine. Relying on this deterrent weaponRipsaw can rush into the crowd using MCCM stun grenades or use non-lethal rubber bullets to scare an approaching enemy from the vehicle. Similar weapons can also be used as offensive weapons. At Ripsaw, another payload has already been tested, including equipment to combat IEDs and mines.





Ripsaw MS2 is remotely controlled from the neighboring M113 BTR. However, as in a semi-autonomous car, many of its functions are computer controlled. The device is designed as a highly adaptable platform that can be integrated with many weapons systems and various payloads.




The height of the Ripsaw MS2 is just the 1.77 meter, so the unit is able to effectively fit into the landscape, disguised from enemy eyes. The low silhouette is also useful when using the unit as an advanced combat module; Ripsaw-MS2 has already been tested with 7.62-mm and 12.7-mm machine guns. BNA was also equipped with Javelin ATGMs, but combat shooting with them has not yet been conducted. The device was equipped with weapons by the US Army, Engineering Development Research Center (Armys Armament Research, Development and Engineering Center, ARDEC) in Picatini Arsenal, New Jersey. The installation kit included a remote-controlled machine gun M240, which was controlled from a separate console installed in the escort vehicle.



Initially, the Ripsaw “drone tank” was designed as a “one-of-a-kind” project in a garage in the backyard. The developer, Howe and Howe Technologies, drew the attention of the US military after the device was introduced in the 2005 year at the DARPA Challenge.





Two years later, a small developing company entered into its first contract with the US Army, which transformed the device into a demonstrator of the capabilities of unmanned ground vehicles.

The current version of the device, called Ripsaw MS2, is larger, faster and more modular than the MS1 version. The device is capable, in spite of the considerable combat damage received, to still be quickly repaired in the field and return to full combat readiness the very next day. According to the manufacturer, unlike other vehicles, which, as a rule, cannot be repaired after a mine or IED, damaged Ripsaw can be "disassembled for parts" right on the spot and assembled in a fully combat-ready unit for one night.





Weighted in 4.5, tons of BNA Ripsaw MS2 are similar in size to the HMMWV. It can carry about one ton of payload and be controlled remotely or by a crew of two people, including the driver. The device is based on the chassis of a light tubular structure, obtained from NASCAR racing cars, driven by a liter diesel engine Duramax developing 6.6 horsepower from 650. and torque in 1356 Nm, thus providing an exceptional power to weight ratio for vehicles in this class. Fully armed and loaded, Ripsaw MS2 can accelerate from 0 to 80 km / h in just 5.5 seconds (!). Top speed is about 100 km / h. "Ripsaw is very fast and agile, he can easily replay the person," said Michael Howe, pointing out that this is not trivial for a BNA.





The high power-to-weight ratio, effective suspension and low ground pressure provide the Ripsaw MS2 with exceptional maneuverability. Its center of gravity is at a height of 70 cm, which results in high stability on a rise of 50 degrees and a side slope of 45 degrees. High ground clearance in 60 cm and relatively low weight, wide tracks and large suspension travel provide low ground pressure of 0.2 kg per square centimeter. This allows the device to overcome rough terrain at high speed, vertical obstacles up to 1.5 meters in height or move over obstacles such as a heavy tank.




An innovative mechanical clutch system that controls the hydrostatic transmission with a powerful, fast and simple mechanical drive is responsible for the rapid acceleration of the car, maneuverability and handling.




Professor's Note
The twin brothers Jeffrey and Michael Howe (Geoffrey and Michael Howe) of North Brunswick Maine, the founders and owners of Howe and Howe Technologies Inc. developed a relatively large tactical ground tracked unmanned vehicle for military purposes, called the Ripsaw Military Spec 1 UGV or Ripsaw MS1 UGV or Rip Saw MS1 UGV. Billed as the “fastest tracked vehicle in the world,” the Ripsaw MS1 is essentially an unmanned, militarized tracked all-terrain vehicle capable of speeding up to 60 km / h in just 4 seconds. The original BIPA Ripsaw (civilian version) could reach 60 km / h in about 3.5 seconds, as it was a little lighter, but not as durable as the militarized version. Initially, the planned Ripsaw speed was around 100km / h, but the Hou brothers found that remotely operating a BNA at a speed exceeding 60 km / h was scary and dangerous enough. According to Jeff Howe, even with 60 km / h, it’s pretty scary, and now they don’t see any tactical need to move faster with the BNA, although ultimately the decision will be made by the US military if they adopt the BNA.




The Hou brothers tried to make the device as simple as possible. The entire unit consists only of 8 components, including the engine and tubular chassis. The engine itself can be dismantled from the chassis in less than an hour. To replace the engine, it just needs to be lowered to the ground and raise the chassis. Well, almost like Zaporozhets. Simple maintenance is one of the main advantages of a car designed to attract customers. For the manufacture of the chassis, you need to cut about 1000 pipes, and therefore Ripsaw inventor Mike Howe invented a new pipe cutting technology that shortens the manufacturing time of the Ripsaw framework by 300-400%.
Read more here
[media=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6TLbviUMouI]
30 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. FATEMOGAN
    +6
    19 February 2013 10: 33
    Amerikosov is not a robot, but a kindergarten, here is our Russian Beast !!!!! laughing

    Combat, telecontrolled army robot of Russia

    1. vladsolo56
      +2
      19 February 2013 10: 37
      Well, this device is just a figment of fantasy
      1. FATEMOGAN
        +2
        19 February 2013 14: 16
        Quote: vladsolo56
        Well, this device is just a figment of fantasy

        science and technology are developing by leaps and bounds, today is fantasy, and tomorrow you look and they will do it in metal! It is necessary to set over-the-horizon tasks, what was, what is striving for.
        1. Hon
          -1
          19 February 2013 15: 51
          Quote: FATEMOGAN
          science and technology are developing by leaps and bounds, today is fantasy, and tomorrow you look and they will do it in metal! It is necessary to set over-the-horizon tasks, what was, what is striving for.

          Of course they are developing, but not with us ... But we have Chubais laughing
        2. Samurai
          0
          20 February 2013 11: 22
          It is unlikely that science in Russia unfortunately backtracked by leaps and bounds. what technologies are there. There are rockets falling almost every day.
      2. Moritz
        0
        21 February 2013 18: 28
        Quote: vladsolo56
        Well, this device is just a figment of fantasy

        real money is being mastered under these fantasies
    2. Skavron
      +2
      19 February 2013 10: 54
      Yes, the cartoon is good.
      1. 0
        19 February 2013 17: 17
        Who has cartoons and who already have real ones, albeit not so quick so far.
        1. postman
          +1
          19 February 2013 17: 59
          saturn.mmm,
          the target is good. ECO will be demolished first
          1. 0
            19 February 2013 19: 26
            Quote: Postman
            the target is good. ECO will be demolished first

            Duck the Americans have Israel against it with RAFAEL's "Trophy" APS (Active Protection System)
            1. -1
              19 February 2013 19: 58
              Why put KAZ with a value of $ 200 thousand on a BNA worth $ 250 thousand?
              1. 0
                19 February 2013 22: 18
                Quote: professor
                Why put KAZ

                Why KAZ in general? Recently offered to install on an armored car.
                1. 0
                  20 February 2013 09: 02
                  Why KAZ in general? Recently offered to install on an armored car

                  Firstly, they didn’t offer it, but already installed,
                  Secondly, we are discussing the SUA where there is no need to pay a pension to the family of a dead soldier, and therefore the need for KAZ is calculated purely economically.
                  1. postman
                    +1
                    20 February 2013 11: 06
                    Quote: professor
                    where there is no need to pay a pension

                    The technique is also worth the money.
                    It all depends on the flow. There will be a lot, the price will fall. VERY strong (GPS chip)
                    will (necessarily) be put on BNA
                  2. 0
                    20 February 2013 19: 18
                    Quote: professor
                    Firstly, they didn’t offer it, but already installed,

                    This is good, people's lives are most valuable, all the more insured.
            2. postman
              0
              20 February 2013 11: 05
              Quote: saturn.mmm
              against this is Israel with

              Yes, even if (!) And put) what she (AZ) will be able to do with Heckler and Koch PSG-1 for example or VKS "Exhaust"?
              === will render
    3. vladsolo56
      +3
      19 February 2013 12: 22
      And yet the cool cartoon looks easy and with pleasure
      1. postman
        0
        19 February 2013 17: 57
        Quote: vladsolo56
        And yet the cartoon is cool

        The cartoon is good, no words.
        only what is shown in it is not feasible on Russian technologies. Moreover, note that the PBX, that Ammunitsya is a clone of the western (American rather), and can not be distinguished
    4. postman
      0
      19 February 2013 18: 09
      Quote: FATEMOGAN
      Combat, telecontrolled army robot of Russia

      What cuties. Of course, with ammunition, they went too far (at least 5 times), and even managed to stick the stretchers.
      straight idylls Russian army of the 21st century (Crimea island?)
      1. +1
        20 February 2013 19: 01
        Quote: Postman
        Threat with ammunition of course went too far (at least 5 times), and even managed to stick the stretcher.
        straight idylls Russian army of the 21st century (Crimea island?)

        Come on, the cartoon is an art thing, the thought itself is not bad, a little maneuverable, just right in the city.
        what is shown in it is not feasible on Russian technologies
        Where it is necessary to start, the road will master the road.
  2. Skavron
    +2
    19 February 2013 10: 39
    or cross obstacles such as a heavy tank. [

    oooooh !!! Figase ... why?
    Although the machine is definitely interesting.
    In the mud it would still be tested.
    1. 0
      19 February 2013 11: 05
      In the mud it would still be tested

      Already and repeatedly.
    2. +3
      19 February 2013 12: 44
      In the mud it would still be tested

      Oh, here’s a smaller version, like replacing an ATV:

  3. +1
    19 February 2013 10: 39
    Let's see if the "garage cars" can break into the big leagues. I doubt it.
  4. vladsolo56
    +2
    19 February 2013 10: 42
    What is shown in the article is amateurism, to create automated combat systems, we need the scientific base of several research institutes, such a machine should be something like the one in the previous commentary, highly protected, highly technological, and with a large supply of computer intelligence, only then you can create what something like that. Although I think that with the modern level of science, everything is possible, again the emphasis is how much it will turn out and how effective it is, if you invest a lot of money, then the return should be commensurate
    1. +5
      19 February 2013 11: 01
      What is shown in the article is amateurism; to create automated combat systems, we need the scientific base of several research institutes

      And if the article had written that it was developed by Boeing by spending $ 134 million on this, would it have reassured you? wink Here's another nugget "on the knee" has done what many research institutes cannot do.
      The famous American aircraft designer Burt (Elbert Leander "Burt" Rutan), recognized as a genius during his lifetime (he is only 69 years old now). He created without a KB with a staff of thousands of people and without gigantic funding for the 367 concepts of aircraft, and 45 of them went up to the sky. One of his creations is the unique Ames-Dryden AD1.

      PS
      The creators of Google also put their first search engine in the dorm room, and the second in the garage, well, amateurs, what do you take from them ... fool
      1. Skavron
        +3
        19 February 2013 11: 11
        Nah ... better money in a cartoon beautiful swell.

        But seriously, great ideas visit only one head, and the remaining heads only perfect this idea.
      2. vladsolo56
        +1
        19 February 2013 11: 16
        you’re a strange person, anyone with aerodynamic knowledge can create a plane that can fly today, a brilliant self-taught person can create a computer program, but create a fighting machine that contains hundreds of parameters, one person isn’t able, do not be offended, but think before writing
        1. -1
          19 February 2013 14: 43
          I just think I'm writing. Creating a plane is much more difficult than an all-terrain vehicle, however, it has created excellent aircraft including this one:

          Google is far from an ordinary computer program.
          It is in the USSR that numerous research institutes with thousands of employees developed what a couple of people sometimes developed in the West. such examples are the sea. And about the device: wait and see.
          By the way, why did you decide that there is one person? The company was founded by at least two brothers. wink
    2. +3
      19 February 2013 12: 42
      These guys created the platform itself. And already there is someone to shove the stuffing there.
  5. +1
    19 February 2013 10: 53
    I read and looked. All these UAVs, SUVs, remind us of themselves. Just like us lol We dig, shoot, kill. And who programmed us? lol
  6. +3
    19 February 2013 13: 14
    New is well forgotten old.
    In 1929-1930, the Soviet Union tested the modified French light tank Renault-FT (Light Tank MS-1), on which telecontrol equipment was installed. After the tests, it was decided on the advisability of continuing the development of the topic of remote control over the air.
    T-18 (MS-1) was launched for testing on March 23, 1930, equipped with control equipment of the "Bridge-1" type. This equipment had three-command control: right-left-stop.
    In 1935-1936, a small series (55 pieces) of a telemechanical group of tanks was developed and produced. The group consisted of a TT-26 tele-tank - a light chemical (flamethrower) suppression tank and a TU-26 control tank, developed on the basis of the T-26 Light tank. The armament of the teletank consisted of a DT machine gun and a flamethrower installation. Also, sometimes 200-700-kg time bombs were used in an armored box, which the tank dropped near the enemy fortifications, which made it possible to destroy bunkers up to four levels underground. Teletanks were also capable of using chemical weapons, although they were not used in hostilities.
    During 1938-1939 in NII-20 NKAP, work was carried out to create and test telemechanical equipment for a group of TT-BT-7 tanks (created respectively on the basis of the BT-7 Fleet Tank), which consisted of a teletank and a control tank. Teletank was intended for reconnaissance of minefields, making passages in wire fences, flamethrowing, placing a smoke screen, degassing or contamination of the area with combat agents.
    Teletank equipment included a receiving device and automation devices for governing bodies, armaments and servo controls of onboard friction clutches and brakes. The radio-telemechanical line was protected from false commands and interference and provided a maximum range of up to 4000 meters. The duration of continuous control was 4-6 hours. The control of the teletank could be carried out both directly by the driver, and at a distance using a push-button remote control.
    The term Teletank means a tank without a crew, controlled remotely (remotely).

    http://rnns.ru/135655-tanki-kiborgi.html

    http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D2%E5%EB%E5%F2%E0%ED%EA

    http://all-tanks.ru/content/teleupravlyaemye-tanki-dovoennogo-perioda
  7. 0
    19 February 2013 19: 50
    There is only one copy. More precisely, in 2 one drone completely the second with a driver's cabin. Of the shortcomings - a gasoline engine, aluminum suspension parts, no armor. And merits - quick easy. Personally, my conclusion is nothing. Such things must be done in a series, and not riveted on the knee.
    1. +1
      19 February 2013 20: 00
      Of the shortcomings - a gasoline engine ...

      Read the article in scrap? request
  8. -1
    19 February 2013 20: 41
    It’s a viable concept for the army.
    Even in the "metal" in which they are.
    After information about him from 2009 of the year on the Internet I can not find information about him.
    So in the army yet.
    And this is infa.
    Probably still testing. They will receive feedback from the military, and in accordance, they will finalize them to the finished product.

    The idea of ​​a suspension solution is what makes the platform original.
    Everything else is as old as the world.

    Yes, I liked the cartoon for the Russian "Combat, remotely controlled army robot"


    In both cases (Russian and American), their main weakness is
    communication with the operator.
    Create "artificial intelligence" (decision-making algorithms), which will "connect" (with such a reaction speed as in animation, it ("artificial intelligence") will have to support operators in making routine decisions to one degree or another,
    the conclusion of the currently necessary visual, acoustic information to the operator).
    Situation: communication with the operator has disappeared, the robot needs himself
    Decide your soldier at gunpoint or a stranger.
    Can someone explain to me what logic should be in this
    case guided by a robot?
  9. 0
    19 February 2013 21: 26
    Something is hard to find.
    Look at the name changed.






  10. 0
    19 February 2013 22: 56
    Riptide is equipped with a range of network electronics and navigation from Raymarine and FLIR including:
    • E-Series widescreen E120W and E90W multifunction displays for driver and gunner
    • Digital Radar RD418D
    • DSM300 HD Digital Sonar
    • Raystar 125 GPS sensor
    • FLIR Navigator thermal imaging system

    Video: RipTide Triumph:
    http://dsc.discovery.com/tv-shows/other-shows/videos/howe-and-howe-tech-r
    iptide-triumph.htm


    Video: RipTide Trouble:
    http://dsc.discovery.com/tv-shows/other-shows/videos/howe-and-howe-tech-riptide-
    beached.htm

  11. rubber_duck
    +1
    20 February 2013 00: 13
    Nice craft. But this cannot be called a "combat apparatus". Where is the place of this toy in the combat formations of the troops? Or is it again for budget cut counter terrorism? Like, everything will work against terrorists, even a quarter-million-dollar caterpillar motorcycle as standard. Terrorists, they are insidious ... lol

    PS Translation terrible unreadable.

    This allows the device to overcome rugged terrain at high speed, vertical obstacles up to 1.5 meters high or to cross obstacles such as a heavy tank.
    Seriously, I thought for a long time what innovation in the suspension of this miracle allows him to move through the tank.

    The device is based on the chassis of a light tubular structure obtained from NASCAR racing cars...
    Yeah, by distillation. laughing

    Etc. etc. am
    1. -1
      20 February 2013 01: 12
      Well, yes, it would be necessary to put him in the armor at the very reluctance.
      Let it be such a small MBT. laughing
      The meaning of this construction is generally lost.
      For a remote-autonomous controlled, it will be enough
      cover up vital structural elements and fillings
      sufficient armor for this particular case.
      And try to "catch" him then on the sandy terrain. No.
    2. +1
      20 February 2013 09: 07
      PS The translation is terrible unreadable.

      The source is specifically indicated for you - read the original! hi
  12. Mr.Net
    0
    20 February 2013 03: 59
    a good thing .. to go hunting. And if in the bushes a bear sits with RPGs then good luck not to be seen.
    1. rubber_duck
      0
      20 February 2013 21: 38
      In the bushes there is a bear with a transmitter (long pole), to which a hare is tied, but he already has RPGs. A bearless hunting system is called. laughing
  13. Red Guard
    0
    5 March 2013 08: 33
    In principle, a normal car, but still there are gross flaws
  14. 0
    21 February 2016 11: 23
    Impressive. Interesting will it be adopted by America or not?