War has been declared on us or...

130
War has been declared on us or...

Well, what our political and military leaders have been talking and writing about for so long in their interviews and reports has finally happened. The same long-criticized unexpected answer has been voiced. The world is entering a new phase of confrontation. Exactly.

What President Vladimir Putin voiced at a meeting with media representatives is not a development or aggravation of existing contradictions, but a new phase of confrontation that radically changes the situation. Russia is beginning to use the same methods as NATO.



For quite a long time we “played someone else’s game,” pretending that we did not understand the strategy of the West, embodied in the centuries-old practice of “pulling chestnuts out of the fire with someone else’s hands.” Probably, many remember the malicious smiles of Western politicians after yet another statement about red lines or an attack on EU territory.

Indeed, attacking European countries or the United States looks like a rather dubious position. For most politicians, this option is not even considered as a strategy leading, among other things, to self-destruction. Although, in my opinion, I would take President Putin’s words about the uselessness of this world if there is no Russia in it seriously.

The thesis that we will begin supplying weapons to those who are fighting our enemies, those who supply weapons to Ukraine, made me think that Vladimir Putin knows the military very well history. In particular, the history of World War II... An idea that fits perfectly in the light of the West’s celebration of the anniversary of the Normandy landings...

Let me remind you that Stalin, almost from the beginning of the invasion of the USSR, began to talk about the need to open a second front. Moreover, President Roosevelt agreed with this. But Prime Minister Churchill was categorically against it. The reason for this was obvious.

For the territory of the island, with the beginning of the war in the east, the danger of German occupation disappeared. But let us remember the geography, the size of the British Empire in particular. For Churchill, maintaining existing logistics was critical.

And Hitler clearly set his sights on complete control of the Mediterranean. To do this it was necessary to capture, for example, the Suez Canal. Hence the war in North Africa and Egypt. The loss of these territories for Britain was tantamount to the loss of part of the empire. And the USSR? This is a “chronic enemy” who temporarily became an ally helping to preserve the British colonies...

Today the situation has changed little. Look how the Houthis have destabilized the situation. What if they “suddenly” have weapons that will actually be capable of destroying NATO ships? Today it is not there, but what if?.. This is just one example of how Russia can create their “Ukraine” for the West.

Is this a declaration of war or...


I absolutely do not understand the logic of the West, which somehow strangely understands participation in the war. I'll go off topic a little to explain my position. Let us remember the interview given to French television by embassy press attaché Alexander Makagonov a little over a month ago.

The howl in the French media is still echoing across Europe. The point is that Russia declared its right to destroy the enemy on the territory of Ukraine, regardless of which country he is a citizen of. According to the French, a military instructor teaching Ukrainians to kill Russians is not a legitimate target!..

Quite a “logical” position. A shell, bomb or missile, according to the logic of French journalists, should “sort” those against whom it is used by citizenship. And when Makagonov directly stated that sending French units to Ukraine was a direct participation in the war, a storm of indignation arose.

The point is simple, “we cannot allow it,” therefore... That is, even then the conversation was not about whether the West would directly participate in the war, but about how Moscow would react to this. “We cannot allow it” and that is why we came to the war, but we are not participating in the war. We, killing your soldiers, simply “cannot allow it.”

I wonder what then is participation in war? I think President Putin gave a fairly straightforward answer to this question. Participation in war is not only soldiers and officers in the LBS, it is the supply of weapons, it is training of enemy military personnel, it is information support, and so on. As you can see, much of the above is already working in Ukraine.

Remember the words of President Putin regarding the supply of German missiles to the Ukrainian Armed Forces? A very tough answer that leaves no double interpretations:

“This would mean their direct participation (this is said specifically about German supplies, but applies to everyone - author) in the war against the Russian Federation, and we reserve the right to act in the same way. We'll think about it."

Moreover, if you read further carefully, Vladimir Putin clearly outlined the boundaries of what Moscow will do if it supplies missiles to Ukraine. The blow turned out to be quite sensitive. The reaction followed almost immediately.

“Now, if they (AFU - author) use missiles to attack targets on Russian territory, this will completely destroy Russian-German relations.”

I think everyone understands that Putin did not just focus on the decision of the German Chancellor on supplies, which was made on May 31. The statement is addressed primarily to President Biden. Let me remind you that the United States gave its permission on May 30. Germany, Poland, Britain, Sweden, the Netherlands simply, like faithful dogs, carried out the command from Washington.

It doesn’t take much intelligence to “put together a puzzle” of current events. The West has actually declared war on Russia. Moscow accepted the challenge. Next comes the time for action. The President of Russia outlined possible directions for these actions at the initial stage. Now the ball is in the West's court. Continue and ultimately lose everything or stop and thus end the conflict in Ukraine.

How? This is a rather complex question, but some “thoughts” still exist in the minds of Western analysts. I will voice it, although I think that this is a rather difficult choice.

So, there are two figures, one whole and one tenth figures, the neutralization of which can move the matter forward. These are American President Biden and Ukrainian pseudo-President Zelensky. The first character is important because all the decisions of the West are actually the decisions of Biden and his team. The second is a purely decorative face, easily replaceable, but necessary at the moment.

Let's start with the American president. The fact that the old man is “strange” doesn’t even cause smiles anymore. President Biden's health is truly a matter of concern not only for us, but also for Americans. Somehow, recent information from the US Democratic Party about Biden’s deteriorating mental health went unnoticed. The information is not from “unnamed sources in...”, but from the Democratic headquarters.

It seems to me that in the time remaining before the election of a new president, the Democrats may well replace the president “for health reasons” with the vice president. This will not entail changes in foreign policy, but it can radically affect the election situation. The election result that is obvious to everyone today, that is, Trump’s victory, will become unobvious...

It’s easier with Zelensky. Everyone understands perfectly well that his “legitimacy” rests on the support of the United States and Britain. As soon as the leaders of these countries even hint about the legitimacy of the authorities in Kyiv, about the Constitution of Ukraine, Zelensky will instantly be devoured by their own. Then the question of a successor arises.

Everything is clear here too. If the West decides to continue the slaughter “until the last Ukrainian,” General Zaluzhny will be president. Whatever analysts say about this figure, Zaluzhny really has authority in Ukrainian society, especially in the army. Ukrainians, still harboring hopes of victory, will accept this figure with delight.

If the conflict is decided to be stopped, another civilian figure will emerge... Dmitry Razumkov. Former speaker of the Verkhovna Rada, that is, a politician of fairly high rank. At the same time, in my understanding, he is a person with whom Moscow can negotiate. I don’t see any other figure with whom Moscow will agree to negotiate from among those in power after the 2014 coup.

We are slowly, but for now we are crawling towards the abyss


Events are developing at such a speed that it is quite difficult to keep track of them. It seems that logic is becoming scarce. As well as responsibility to the people for their decisions and actions. Western politicians are especially striking. In the morning they say one thing, at lunch another, in the evening another.

I have already written that ordinary people have ceased to be afraid of war. We are far from war and this does not concern us. And the footage broadcast by the media is just a “video sequence”. If I don’t like what they show there, I’ll just switch the channel to some Hollywood action movie, where they show the same thing, but we always win... This is a typical view of modern war from the average person.

Meanwhile, I repeat for the thousandth time, the world is stubbornly moving towards a war of complete destruction. Every day could be the last day of peace. We’ll leave the tales that smart politicians rule the world for kids.

Today, in my opinion, mutual distrust has reached the point where any “wrong move” could mean “cleansing planet Earth” of humanity, and perhaps the planet itself will turn into a second asteroid belt in the solar system...

So we have two options. Either the world will change and become different or disappear... Let's hope that the powers that be, at least based on the instinct of self-preservation, will make the right decision...
130 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +35
    11 June 2024 04: 53
    For quite a long time we “played someone else’s game,” pretending that we did not understand the strategy of the West, embodied in the centuries-old practice of “pulling chestnuts out of the fire with someone else’s hands.”

    we played, we play and we will play...
    1. +29
      11 June 2024 06: 56
      De jure, the West has not yet declared war on us, but de facto, thanks to the cowardly position of our leadership, it is intensifying. The escalation of attacks on us will only increase, and it is not yet clear whether our leadership is finally going to give an adequate response to this aggression.
      1. +2
        11 June 2024 08: 00
        What does “adequate response” mean, in your understanding?
        If real hostilities begin with NATO, then the Russian army will have serious problems; the military potentials are not comparable! fool there is no need to look at the fact that everyone in the EU is relaxed, even in this state, Europe can easily assemble a group of 500-800 thousand bayonets on the border with the Republic of Belarus. And NATO aviation is the strongest air force on the planet. Our losses will increase manifold, the destruction of infrastructure and industry will begin with varying degrees of effectiveness, despite all the power of our air defense, we still miss attacks. In such conditions, we will be obliged to begin clearing the orbital space of satellites, strike deep into NATO countries, all this is already enough for someone to eventually use nuclear weapons, and on our part, the use of nuclear weapons is most likely without an alternative perspective , which means disarming the first strike of nuclear weapons from NATO is a self-evident scenario! belay in the event of a collision with NATO, nuclear war is simply inevitable! The whole world understands this!!! And if Russia begins to escalate towards a direct conflict with NATO, then we will lose the support of China and other countries, because they support us in order to change the world for the better, and not so that we destroy it! The West understands this and therefore it is not afraid of our response bully
        Unfortunately, the only option on our part is victory over ANY forces in Ukraine!!! And, strange as it may sound, the international isolation of Western countries, it seems to me, would be a good strategy for the introduction of sanctions by Russia against, first of all, England, with the aim of either completely depriving or forcing them to overpay in comparison with other countries for some resources . To do this, we are obliged to take control (through investments, support of foreign governments, concluding alliances) of some important resources (Uranium, oil, rare earth metals, or something else) and prohibit or complicate their supply to England, for example through their peace conference, in which they accuse England of inciting World War 3 and, with the approval of other countries, present an ultimatum to England, either it stops aggression or remains without oil!!! In this case, the West will be put in a really difficult position soldier
        1. +12
          11 June 2024 08: 33
          The adequate response, in my understanding, is when, after missiles and drone strikes on the indigenous territory of Russia, inflicted specifically by the NATO military, symmetrical strikes are carried out precisely on the territory of these countries. Only in this way will we stop further escalation.
          1. +26
            11 June 2024 09: 37
            It could have been stopped when the West began importing binoculars to Ukraine. But when discussing the Northern Military District, everyone forgets that the Kremlin is trading with the West with might and main. In one place they are loudly indignant, in another they are quietly counting money.
        2. BAI
          +8
          11 June 2024 10: 34
          What does “adequate response” mean, in your understanding?

          The adequate answer is when NATO soldiers, and not just Russian ones, die.
          Otherwise there is just wild delight - 350 Russian soldiers died and not a single American one (quote, I think we have less than 000)
          Now the war is proceeding according to the most profitable and comfortable scenario for NATO. And according to this scenario, it will continue until Russia is defeated. And since defeat is unacceptable, the only way out is the use of nuclear weapons.
          A direct clash with NATO is inevitable. And this is a nuclear war; Russia has no other choice. Only now they are not ready, but in a few years they will look for a reason on their own.
          The West will not understand any other arguments. Economically, Russia cannot do anything to him. They will find any replacement. We managed without gas
          1. 0
            11 June 2024 20: 37
            They're just not ready now

            The war in Ukraine is a US scenario, they have been trying to drag us into this war since 2014! am
            They need this war, Putin did his best for 8 years, but in the end Russia was put into such a framework that we were forced to get drawn into the war in Ukraine. All these confessions by German Chancellor Merkel and the President of France that they deceived Putin, is it just that, have they contracted verbal diarrhea? No, this was the last nail in the coffin of ANY peace initiatives!!! Whatever there is no choice: only war!
            And after that, do you think that they are not ready there? This is their scenario for the development of events, so they are definitely prepared for what they need!

            And in general, I see more than enough people wanting to go to HEAVEN laughing people, do you even understand what you are calling for? Do you care what happens to your families?

            The situation is extremely dangerous and difficult, but not hopeless, and in this situation you need to check every step and then you can come out of it as a winner and possibly with a good plus! But this is a war and casualties are inevitable, the only thing you can do is try to avoid unnecessary casualties!!!
            1. 0
              13 June 2024 11: 00
              There is not a single person here who wants to go to heaven. Just a discussion of the worst phase of the confrontation in conditions where the peaceful phase is self-evident and discussed by heart. One cannot be equated with suicide by talking about a real nuclear conflict, but without a long prelude about peaceful or easy ways.
        3. +1
          11 June 2024 13: 08
          Thank you, the most adequate answer. There are a lot of armchair hawks here
        4. 0
          19 June 2024 11: 40
          ..if Russia begins to escalate towards a direct conflict with NATO, then we will lose the support of China and other countries, because they support us to change the world for the better..

          *
          Of course, China is like a monkey, wanting to get bananas for free and generally become the boss when the tigers kill each other!
          It is still difficult to clearly define China’s position in relation to Russia: some goods are supplied to us, but at the same time it makes money with triple the force - and this is definitely not friendship.
          And if this is the case, then another knife in the back from such a “friend” is quite possible when they press him.
          It is beneficial for China that the United States and Russia weaken each other, and then it will rule.
          And he calmly watches the bleeding of Russia, knowing that Russia alone cannot withstand the West without the use of nuclear weapons.
          Does he not understand this? He understands perfectly, but...
          China will swallow our use of nuclear weapons based on the fact that Russia will demonstrate its firmness and defense of national interests, or rather, the defense of its sovereignty.
          1. 0
            19 June 2024 22: 42
            Interaction between peoples is not like relationships between friends, they are more like relationships between work colleagues hi
            As long as you are doing the same thing and your interests coincide, your relationship is similar to a friendly one, but if the tasks in your work have changed and your goals diverge, then the friendship comes to an end! At best, you maintain a respectful relationship; at worst, you will become competitors and rivals
      2. +2
        11 June 2024 12: 29
        It is still unclear whether our leadership is finally going to give an adequate response to this aggression.

        Deadlock in GDP's position on tactical nuclear weapons. For GDP, apparently, it doesn’t matter how many of our soldiers are buried. The principles and opinion of the world community are important to him. And if, instead of the second stage of the nuclear forces exercises, they had already issued a targeted warning on Ukraine, then the European West would already have their pants full.
        1. +9
          11 June 2024 12: 39
          He is already at a dead end on everything. He has difficulty finding the formulation of an answer, often looks at the text. Akella has grown old. And the advisers... Well, they fled - Dvorkovich, Illarionov and Co.
          1. Qas
            +1
            16 June 2024 00: 12
            Akella has long turned into Leopold the Cat with his “Guys, let’s live together.” And the “guys” just twirl his mustache tighter...
        2. BAI
          +5
          11 June 2024 13: 11
          If they had already issued a targeted warning about Ukraine, then the European West would already have their pants full.

          The West doesn't care about Ukraine. After that, they would simply supply tactical nuclear weapons to Ukraine and let the Russians kill Russians in Ukraine and in Russia further
          1. -1
            11 June 2024 14: 18
            delivered tactical nuclear weapons to Ukraine
            If they don’t, Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Algeria, Indonesia, Brazil, and Thailand will immediately have a question: what can they do and we can’t do it? And within a few years, Vanuatu and Guinea will become nuclear powers.
            1. 0
              11 June 2024 15: 09
              The West doesn't care about Ukraine. After that they would simply supply tactical nuclear weapons to Ukraine

              Who is the West? For those who don't know: This is primarily the USA. The rest are satellites and vassals.
              And the main opponents of the supply: Israel and the Jewish lobby in the United States, who understand that in this way the Arab countries and Iran will have tactical nuclear weapons and Israel would either have to be greatly reduced or simply disappear.
    2. AAK
      +17
      11 June 2024 07: 22
      The Greatest has been thinking about the “answer to his partners” for more than two years now... or rather, he said that “we’ll think about it...”, well, how long will the thought wander through his convolutions? Then the media reported an approximate figure that the Banderas have lost about half a million since the beginning of the Northern Military District... I understand, this is propaganda, however... but even if the value of their irretrievable losses is even 300-350 thousand, this means that our losses are at least in the region of 100 thousand, which is also quite a lot, on parent’s day on the way to the city cemetery I saw a sector with the graves of our fallen soldiers and this is not a dozen or even a hundred and this is only in our city... the question is how many are ours Will the giant of thought still think?
      1. +6
        11 June 2024 09: 51
        The West uses the “1000 cuts” strategy with a large set of surgical instruments.

        Russia does not have such tools, and therefore there are no answers. The only strategy that can neutralize NATO and this strategy is the defeat of Ukraine. Military, territorial, demographic, economic.

        Russia is currently unable to inflict such a defeat. Time is not in Russia's favor. All speculation about Trump, a friend, is fantasy.

        The most likely outcome given the current balance of forces is a frozen conflict with the resulting resuscitation of Ukraine by the West, the inevitability of a new campaign, and a continuation of the “1000 cuts” strategy.
        1. 0
          13 June 2024 11: 07
          But this is an option to “give up.” Roll away, sit down, hide. Call it whatever you like. "Unable to" option. No, I can. Deployment of the army with unpopular measures. “The most likely outcome” is the most unlikely.
      2. -7
        11 June 2024 17: 52
        thank God that people like you are not ruling our country!
      3. +1
        12 June 2024 07: 52
        The bosses don't care about the plebeians. The main thing is the money. And our chief persuader must remember his promises of demilitarization and denazification. Result?
        1. 0
          13 June 2024 01: 15
          again he will make pitiful eyes and say - they deceived me, but I believed them..
          The main thing is that the daughters and sons of all those who surround this old man were warm.
          Shoigu’s daughter - look in Yandex for what billions she is currently moving.
          ask a question - what is Shoigu’s daughter doing now 2024
  2. +29
    11 June 2024 04: 54
    It doesn't really look like the Russian leadership has a certain "path", although the president's name gives a hint.

    If for half a century the direction of politics is now in one direction, then in the opposite direction, then again “sort of like before” - this does not look like moving in some “way”.
    First they weakened the country and divided it into parts, and then they aggravated relations... Not even with the West, but between the former parts of the whole... Where is the “path”?

    In the famous film about “seventeen moments...” - a certain Müller said that if marking time occurs, it means the enemy is working here.
    1. +25
      11 June 2024 05: 42
      There is an anecdote about an old horse.. “Well, I couldn’t do it..” That’s what it’s for. Since you can’t win at VNA with NATO, it means you need to give the plebs a new idea - let’s supply weapons to someone... And then it’s “who are you “They’ll hit our own tanker with our own weapons. Where did this propagandist Staver, together with the Kremlin old man he dearly loved, see our allies in the world, ready to fight against the same assholes?
      1. +29
        11 June 2024 05: 53
        Unfortunately, many of Putin’s promises have not been fulfilled, so there is little faith in his statements.
        1. +27
          11 June 2024 06: 52
          Many? Yes, he only fulfills what he did not promise. For example, increasing demographics due to the import of migrants in trains.
          1. +18
            11 June 2024 09: 01
            “Yes, he only fulfills what he did not promise.”
            Bravo, you definitely need to remember this. good laughing
          2. +17
            11 June 2024 09: 11
            "due to the transport of migrants in trains"
            soon expect Afghans with bags of heroin, daggers for cutting off the heads of infidels, lice, cholera, typhoid fever. The Taliban have already agreed, the same Taliban, which is an extremist terrorist, and seems to be banned somewhere laughing
  3. +24
    11 June 2024 05: 01
    The time for diplomacy of “addresses”, “red lines” and “concerns” is over. The time has come for diplomacy of action, but here we are somehow not quite comme il faut.

    It is impossible and harmful to respond to the enemy’s actions with statements and warnings endlessly.

    This naturally gives him a feeling of impunity and permissiveness.

    It is natural for their own population to feel defenseless and unsure of the authorities’ ability to effectively repel threats.

    Inaction only leads to further deterioration of the situation.
    1. +17
      11 June 2024 05: 44
      Quote: Vladimir80
      we played, we play and we will play...

      Quote: ivan2022
      if there is marking time, it means the enemy is working here.

      Quote: avia12005
      Inaction only leads to further deterioration of the situation.

      This is the general opinion...
      1. +8
        11 June 2024 07: 22
        Who would hear and take into account this general opinion.
      2. -26
        11 June 2024 07: 55
        All power to the Soviets!

        Quote from Uncle Lee
        This is the general opinion...
        Quote: avia12005
        Who would hear and take into account this general opinion.

        General opinion - who? Let me remind you that 87,28% voted for Putin. The rest are a statistical error - do you mean their opinion? I'm not interested in their opinion. I am a Bolshevik and for me the opinion of the majority is a priority.
        1. +11
          11 June 2024 07: 59
          Quote: Boris55
          87,28% voted for Putin.
          Let's assume that they voted.... And what % supports him?
          1. 0
            13 June 2024 11: 10
            According to the rules of refined world democracy, there is no difference between voting and supporting. Unless we're talking about Russia. There are any exceptions for her.
        2. +23
          11 June 2024 08: 10
          The Bolsheviks would have put such a leader against the wall. Like a Trotskyist Yes..Bolshevik, damn it..Television.
          1. -29
            11 June 2024 08: 38
            All power to the Soviets!

            Quote: Uncle Lee
            What percentage supports it?

            In essence, the elections were a referendum on confidence in Putin. That's how many voted for him - that's how many support him. And me too.

            Quote from: dmi.pris1
            The Bolsheviks would have put such a leader against the wall.

            You have the wrong idea about the Bolsheviks. Putin is a Bolshevik. Everything he does is in the interests of the majority and the majority reciprocates his feelings. I hope you are aware of what he did for the majority. I have written about this more than once.

            ps
            "Bolshevism - This is not a Russian variety of Marxism and not party affiliation. And the “Jewish Bolshevism" used by Hitler in Mine Campf is completely meaningless, since Bolshevism is a phenomenon of the spirit of Russian civilization, and not the spirit of the bearers of the doctrine of biblical global slavery on a racial basis.

            Bolshevism existed before Marxism, existed in Russian Marxism, somehow it exists today. It will continue to exist.

            As stated by the Bolsheviks themselves, members of the Marxist party of the RSDLP * (b), it was they who expressed in politics the strategic interests of the working majority of the population of multinational Russia, as a result of which only they had the right to be called Bolsheviks. Regardless of how infallible the Bolsheviks are in expressing the strategic interests of the labor majority, how much this majority is aware of its strategic interests and true to them in life, the essence of Bolshevism is not the numerical superiority of the adherents of certain ideas over the adherents of other ideas and the thoughtless crowd, namely this:
            - in a sincere desire to express and implement the long-term strategic interests of the working majority, who want no one to parasitize on their work and life. In other words, the essence of Bolshevism is historically realistic in every era in the active support of the transition process from the historically established crowd-“elitism” to the multinational humanity of the Earth of a future era.
            1. +18
              11 June 2024 10: 17
              Boris, there you have an epigraph - All power to the Soviets! The correct slogan, I don’t argue. How will you achieve it with the support of Putin and thieves from power? And where are these Soviets. Support even the bald devil, just don’t disgrace yourself with the slogan
        3. +8
          11 June 2024 14: 23
          After your statement about the majority, the impression was created that you live anywhere, but not in Russia. In our country (the majority of voters) go to the polls to please the authorities, because... the boss at work is the president on whom it depends whether a person will have butter on his bread or not. The more depressed the area, the more state employees there are, the higher the turnout. This has been verified by long-term observations of election statistics.
          1. The comment was deleted.
            1. The comment was deleted.
        4. Qas
          0
          16 June 2024 00: 20
          Were there any real candidates? These were elections without choice, hence the percentage. And don’t say that we have no one other than GDP...
  4. -26
    11 June 2024 05: 08
    My opinion is that Putin will not start anything against NATO and EU countries now. There are elections going on there, and there is a possibility that the government will change. This means that the policy regarding the supply of weapons/“instructors” to Ukraine may also change. Not a fact, of course, but it cannot be ruled out. As for Biden... Our president has already shown that he is patient, and that patience usually brings success. I believe that Biden will not be re-elected for a second term. Although, in my opinion, he is more preferable to us as President of the United States than Trump. Trump has more brains and can cause us problems.
    1. +20
      11 June 2024 05: 22
      The policy regarding the supply of weapons/"instructors" to Ukraine may also change. Not a fact, of course, but it cannot be ruled out either.

      What a sweet lie, and I can continue to rest on my side, thank you!
    2. +12
      11 June 2024 05: 57
      Quote: Grandfather is an amateur
      My opinion is that Putin will not start anything against NATO and EU countries now. There are elections going on there, and there is a possibility that the government will change.

      holy simplicity as it is... the West will suddenly become kind, we will all hug and go home... seriously? They are trying to destroy our entire History, what the hell are you talking about?
      1. 0
        12 June 2024 04: 35
        the west will suddenly become kind, we will all hug and go home...seriously?
        Absolutely misreading of my words. The point is not kindness, but the fact that politicians who do not want arms supplies to Ukraine may appear in power there. Who will want a dialogue with us. And no hugs.
    3. +10
      11 June 2024 06: 25
      My opinion is that Putin will not start anything against NATO and EU countries now.

      Absolutely right. Neither now nor later
      This is just one example of how Russia can create their “Ukraine” for the West.

      There are plenty of examples of what can be done.
      But there are only two tools in use - a felt-tip pen for drawing, and some kind of pipe - to give a signal.
    4. +8
      11 June 2024 07: 19
      And what does “elections there” have to do with it? The West was, is and will be "the West". We either have “China is with us - hurray”!, or “Trump is ours, again - hurray!”... We are more interested in when “our rudders” will be “ours”.
    5. +5
      11 June 2024 07: 50
      Quote: Grandfather is an amateur
      My opinion is that Putin will not start anything against NATO and EU countries now. There are elections going on there, and there is a possibility that the government will change.


      It will not change, the right has strengthened its position in France, Italy, Germany, but this is not enough to reverse the course of Europe. Someone is already prophesying that Macron/Scholz will even resign against this background... but is that so?

      In Germany, they don’t even want to hold early parliamentary elections, only in the fall, and then the CDU/CSU is in the lead - a conservative party, a supporter of European integration, so Scholz is not particularly in danger.

      For Macron, the situation is more difficult, but the presidential elections were only in 2022, he may well sit in the chair until 2027. In parliament, his party will most likely lose some ground... but the general course of France will not change.

      In Italy, the leader Meloni is right... We already know her course towards supporting Ukraine and confronting Russia, so there’s not much to talk about.

      But in the rest of Europe, the position of the right is not so strong, and the current elections have shown this. More of a party for the European course, for assistance to Ukraine, etc. There is no point in waiting for a reversal/change of course here.
    6. +1
      11 June 2024 12: 44
      there is a possibility that the government will change.

      These are elections to the European Parliament, which does not influence politics. But the necessary elections are not so quick. It takes a long time to fight for them.
    7. +1
      11 June 2024 13: 37
      Quote: Grandfather is an amateur
      This means that the policy regarding the supply of weapons/“instructors” to Ukraine may also change.

      Yes, nothing will ever change there, as an example, if tomorrow in Germany Scholz resigns, an even greater Russophobe Merz will take his place.
    8. +4
      11 June 2024 14: 40
      It’s not worth giving a downvote for an opinion and I won’t. I'll express my opinion. I don’t care who the president is in America, he is not the one who determines the country’s policy, so it doesn’t matter whether it’s Biden or Trump. But irremovability, lack of alternatives, lack of any real goals and objectives in Russia, is our problem. At the moment, if not everything is lost, then a lot, then I expect it will only get worse.
  5. +19
    11 June 2024 05: 11
    we have two ways. Either the world will change and become different or disappear...
    What other way is this? Will capitalists suddenly stop dividing the world, join forces and begin to explore Mars? Why plant apple trees there?
    1. -16
      11 June 2024 05: 24
      Capitalists will suddenly stop dividing the world, join forces and begin to explore Mars

      you know, maybe it will be like this (not for long, though), and you continue to sing “international” in the morning...
      1. +19
        11 June 2024 05: 35
        and you continue to sing “Internationale” in the morning...
        Do you sing “God Save the Tsar” in the morning?
        maybe it will be like this (not for long though)
        And after a short truce, how will they plant the apple trees, wait for the harvest, and begin to divide it? “This is for you... this is for me... this is for you... this is back to you... this is for you all the time... Have I deprived myself?” (c)... Draw red lines with a marker..
  6. +15
    11 June 2024 05: 29
    It is not politicians who rule the world... Politicians simply voice the current agenda, like press secretaries. And the world will not disappear, there are no fools there (among the puppeteers) There is no doubt about one thing - both Ze and Pu, each in their own way, are pulling Ukraine and the Russian Federation to the point of no return... But then the terrible thing will begin.
    1. +14
      11 June 2024 07: 09
      You know, I watched one series once. There two groups constantly beat each other. Sometimes some will watch for others, sometimes vice versa. Each group has its own chieftain. who commands everything. But then after a few episodes it turns out that there are curators. who tell the chieftains when to clash and when to wait. And finally, at the end of the film, it turns out that the curators receive instructions from one center.
      That is, at the bottom, ordinary fighters of the groups think that they are fighting for an idea.
      1. +2
        13 June 2024 02: 00
        It was once a revelation for me, the year 2010.
        Mashka Zakharova scolded Echo of Moscow and Venediktov from all angles for being pro-Western and falling under America. They actually had an ideological struggle - both in interviews and in offline statements.
        And then I saw a photo of Masha and the Hairy Jew being friends together in a restaurant with their families. It turns out that they are godparents of each other's children. That's all you need to know about Masha and her ideological struggle with Western henchmen.
        and remembering her wedding photos, how she left everything in the Russian Federation and flew to New York to ride in limousines - it becomes even clearer what is really going on in her head.
    2. +1
      11 June 2024 13: 39
      Quote: curvimeter
      But then the terrible thing begins.

      This is a reference to Putin's quote "we haven't started anything yet." laughing
  7. +21
    11 June 2024 05: 31
    It’s a little chaotic, of course, but the article contains more questions; it turns out that this isn’t all a great multi-move? It turns out the president has announced a new round of confrontations? What happened before that? Did you all eat ice cream together? They are completely confused, but at the same time, with just one word about supplies, the president dealt a crushing blow to Western partners? With tough answers without double interpretations, will we think about the phrase? What will change if you remove Biden or Zelensky? And if we have literally already verbally kicked the whole West, then why should I, at the end of the article, prepare for paradise again? Here in the next article they tell me to raise the demographics, but here to save up for a wooden mac, they completely confused the average person....
  8. +7
    11 June 2024 05: 35
    Quote: curvimeter
    But then the terrible thing begins.

    It began in 2014...from the Maidan...from that moment on, Putin made a series of political mistakes that led to a natural military conflict.
    Now everything is decided on the battlefield and not only with the Nazi regime in Kyiv but also with NATO as a whole.
    Washington adopted the Nixon Doctrine...increasing the level of escalation of the war until the moment of surrender and defeat in the war for Russia.
    These explain the allegedly insane behavior of Zelensky and Biden.
    1. +1
      11 June 2024 06: 01
      from that moment on, Putin made a series of political mistakes that led to a natural military conflict.
      Now everything is decided on the battlefield and not only with the Nazi regime in Kyiv but also with NATO as a whole.

      incredible porridge!
      who started the natural conflict?
      “it is decided on the battlefield” we have been hearing this mantra for three years now... (essentially a lie)
      “with NATO as a whole” is completely ridiculous...
      1. -1
        11 June 2024 13: 41
        Quote: Vladimir80
        who started the natural conflict?

        The West started the conflict.
    2. +4
      11 June 2024 09: 22
      “Now everything is decided on the battlefield and not only with the Nazi regime in Kyiv but also with NATO as a whole”
      On the battlefield with NATO, the Russian Armed Forces have 0 chances. They will bombard you with equipment, from missiles, airplanes, tanks, to machine guns/machine guns. a small but well-armed army did not work out. as it turned out, in a war, even a strange one, the little one doesn’t roll at all, and there’s still something wrong with the weapons
  9. +15
    11 June 2024 05: 40
    And Hitler clearly set his sights on complete control of the Mediterranean. To do this it was necessary to capture, for example, the Suez Canal. Hence the war in North Africa, in Egypt
    Hitler sent Rommel's corps to North Africa not at all to capture Suez, but to help his friend Mussolini, who was deep in the war with the British there.
  10. G17
    +12
    11 June 2024 05: 52
    I don’t see any point in pinning any hopes on yet another red line and drawing plans for attacks on NATO targets by the Houthis or Iranians. At SPIEF 2024, the President of the Russian Federation directly said that possible deliveries of Russian weapons to the enemies of the West will not happen tomorrow, since they are associated with a number of circumstances that cannot be ignored. It is necessary to achieve agreements with partners that would correspond to the interests of Russia and would be “maximally reliable.” He pointed out that it would not be possible to fight with everyone: “As Joseph Vissarionovich Stalin said: I don’t have any other writers for you. Well, these are the partners, what now, should we fight with everyone?” That is, in response to shelling of Russian cities and military installations, Moscow wants to sign a piece of paper with “guarantees” with the West.
    1. +11
      11 June 2024 06: 10
      Moscow wants to sign a piece of paper with “guarantees” with the West.
      Yeah, with the payment of penalties if the guarantees are violated. smile
  11. +16
    11 June 2024 06: 41
    Let me emphasize that we will not have a military victory. Ukraine is also incapable of winning. We are playing according to someone else’s scenario, which provides for the depletion of the economy, resources, and then fatigue and embitterment of society. And here is your first bell in the comments to this blah blah blah - article by the author. Almost all comments contain sarcasm and irritation towards the country's leadership, which is stubbornly moving towards February 1917...
    1. +4
      11 June 2024 07: 38
      Yes, there is more and more irritation, but 1917 will not work. There are no those who will offer another option for the development of the country and society that is different from the option of the imperialists.
      1. +8
        11 June 2024 10: 13
        I don't have those

        I should note that at the time of February 1917, there were about 20 thousand Bolsheviks in vast Rus'. Nothing. And the vast majority had never even heard of Lenin... The socialist revolution was always presented as some kind of fantastic abstract speculation.
        1. 0
          11 June 2024 10: 15
          So people did not yet know that there was an option for the development of the country “communism in the next five-year plan.” Now they know.
          1. +8
            11 June 2024 10: 18
            Ilyich said correctly - the most important achievement of October is that it showed that a socialist revolution is possible in principle. And it will be easier for us, relying on the achievements of the giants of the past, because we already have experience. Both positive and negative. There is something to work with.
      2. +1
        11 June 2024 13: 45
        Quote: Smoked
        Yes, there is more and more irritation, but 1917 will not work.

        Do we need a repeat of 1917 now? Do we want civil war and loss of territories? For me the answer is obvious, I don’t know about others.
        1. +1
          11 June 2024 13: 49
          And this is how the ruling class will decide among themselves.
  12. +22
    11 June 2024 06: 49
    I asked to return the minuses for Staver. Why do I have to explain something? Staver always has minuses. For example, I like to write fantasy stories, but I don’t hide it. Staver passes off his fiction as reality. On the planet, reality consists of what happens. It's raining now. I saw the rain, now I’m looking at the puddles from the balcony.
    And Staver suggests being proud that the president promised something. He promised so many things for 25 million jobs, but for some reason he gave wooden macs to everyone. And vice versa, he didn’t say anything at all that he would import migrants, but he does. And he will not supply weapons to anyone. Everything will be cheaper. As soon as the Houthis fire at someone, all Russian journalists will announce that it was from Russian weapons. It’s important to say, it’s not necessary to do.
    1. +9
      11 June 2024 07: 04
      One should not delude oneself. Neither the president nor anyone else in Russia has been promising anything to anyone for a long time.

      The president did not promise about millions of jobs, but “gave instructions to the government.” And the chairman of the government is already different.... . They can “give signals”, “make serious promises”. But only the ruling party that has power can “promise the people.”

      And by the way, our president and the head of our government are non-partisan....... laughing

      The man said, but you yourself understand that everything in the country cannot depend on one man? He wanted the best, but he was deceived, but it turned out as always..... For example, for decades they invested in Ukraine, transferred trillions of dollars to the West, but..... cunning..... s and hohli deceived..
      1. +7
        11 June 2024 07: 11
        And by the way, our president and the head of our government are non-partisan
        Well, this is again part of the series of talk and do. It's not what they say that's real, but what they do.
        1. +3
          11 June 2024 07: 32
          To do this, you need to have local power. Only the ruling party has this. And it does an excellent job, because it was created by big business for big business and works for it.

          One president cannot get involved in all the affairs of a country worth more than a hundred million.
          This has always been the case. Even under the Autocracy, it was not the Tsar, but the nobles who ruled the country.

          Have no doubt, they have always done and are doing exactly what they say. You just need to listen carefully. If they say that “today we thought about the good of the people,” there can be no doubt.
          1. +19
            11 June 2024 07: 52
            In some ways you are right. But if Putin reproaches Lenin for the Brest peace, then I also reproach Putin for the shameful Minsk peace. If Putin recently considered the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact bad, now he himself is eager to conclude an agreement with Zelensky...
            1. +4
              11 June 2024 14: 12
              The Brest-Litovsk Peace Treaty and the Molotov Pact were needed by the USSR, and the Minsk Peace Treaty was needed by the West. The next negotiations will begin only after Russia is exhausted.
          2. +8
            11 June 2024 09: 28
            “If they say that “today we thought about the good of the people,” there can be no doubt.”
            they really thought. I mean, don’t the people have too many benefits, and is it time to cut them?
            1. Alf
              +4
              11 June 2024 12: 07
              Quote: ZloyKot
              “If they say that “today we thought about the good of the people,” there can be no doubt.”
              they really thought. I mean, don’t the people have too many benefits, and is it time to cut them?

              Like in an old joke.
              Putin at the meeting of the Russian Union of Industrialists and Entrepreneurs.
              Guys, you have everything you wanted, it’s time to think about the people.
              One of the Russian Union of Industrialists and Entrepreneurs.
              Yes, yes, Vladimir, Vladimirovich. We figured out that for starters, 200 thousand souls per person would be enough.
  13. +1
    11 June 2024 07: 19
    There’s even nothing to oppose either to the author or the commentator!
  14. +1
    11 June 2024 07: 24
    What is all the fuss about the delivery of missiles? Leopards are ok, Bradley is ok, but rockets and tapa are not ok? So missiles have also already been supplied. And they will deliver tactical weapons if we hit. Yes
  15. +3
    11 June 2024 07: 36
    And Hitler clearly set his sights on complete control of the Mediterranean. To do this it was necessary to capture, for example, the Suez Canal. Hence the war in North Africa and Egypt. The loss of these territories for Britain was tantamount to the loss of part of the empire. And the USSR? This is a “chronic enemy” who temporarily became an ally helping to preserve the British colonies...
    The howl in the French media is still echoing across Europe. ....
    ....there are two figures, one whole and one tenth figures, the neutralization of which can move the matter forward. These are American President Biden and Ukrainian pseudo-President Zelensky.

    Yes, to comment on such an author’s work in the “althistorical” genre is only to spoil it....
    1. +4
      11 June 2024 09: 57
      the author's work in the genre of "althistorical"
      He has all this creativity going on...
  16. 0
    11 June 2024 07: 37
    There is no way to compare the last century with the present. Everything there was subordinated to the arms race. They produced hundreds of times more weapons than now. The emphasis on nuclear weapons can play both a positive and negative role. All plans for waging war are decided at headquarters. But as a rule, the war itself begins to control people. Not a single plan has yet coincided with the course of the war. No one. If we don’t want there to be a big war, we must differ from the other side in everything. In rhetoric, in behavior. More human qualities must appear. Seeing another enemy will make our enemies think.
  17. +4
    11 June 2024 07: 38
    Quote: Arzt
    And they will deliver tactical nuclear weapons

    Quite possible. Imagine: “The year is 2027, the ruins of the ancient fortress of the capital, in some houses where there are gasoline generators, TV is running, the first and only channel is shown, some people are giving interviews from a bunker under the light of mercury lamps - .... but still this will not change the situation on the battlefield..."
  18. +7
    11 June 2024 07: 46
    We are slowly, but for now we are crawling towards the abyss
    Either the world will change and become different or disappear...

    Bravo, Alexander!
    This is the essence of the article. We are crawling at the speed set by the partners of V.V. Putin and S.V. Lavrov towards that wonderful moment when these partners will finally deal with us, with acceptable damage to themselves. But our “elite” will go to Heaven, and they will continue to suffer on this damned Earth.
    Well, why should the collective West want to negotiate with us?
    1. +6
      11 June 2024 09: 27
      our elite will not go to heaven, but will live well on the sinful earth... the United States will not suffer any damage, neither acceptable nor minimal... and about sliding into the abyss - these are fairy tales for fools from the plebs and the electorate... under these fairy tales the USSR surrendered about nuclear war - the plebs believed in the danger of nuclear war and did not oppose the decision of our communist elite: the destruction of a great country in exchange for peace... the Russian Federation will also surrender...
      1. 0
        11 June 2024 09: 34
        our elite will not go to heaven, but will live on sinful earth...

        I don’t agree with this, they have plenty of their own, which means ours are in the morgue. The planet is overpopulated. Repeating the same operation twice will not work. And considering how our so-called The “elite” underwent a stress test on June 24.06.2033, XNUMX, its complete replacement is a matter of the near future.
        1. Alf
          +1
          11 June 2024 12: 09
          Quote: Victor Leningradets
          Its complete replacement is a matter of the near future.

          And who will change it?
          1. 0
            11 June 2024 13: 05
            And who will change it?

            Either these or these. Who will be in time first?
        2. 0
          11 June 2024 17: 41
          alas... you don’t understand that the elite is built on an ethnic principle where everyone is their own and everyone is tied together and therefore trust each other... their fellow tribesmen in other countries will not let our elite fall into ruin
          1. 0
            11 June 2024 17: 52
            alas... you don’t understand that the elite is built on an ethnic principle where everyone is their own and everyone is tied together and therefore trust each other... their fellow tribesmen in other countries will not let our elite fall into ruin

            These principles do not work anywhere, if you are talking about Jews, don’t believe them, they only apply to the elite indirectly. Nobody ever let our dandruff into the real elite. And for others, they are just a branch of the Russian Mafia, so with your fellow tribesmen, follow Berezovsky!
            1. 0
              11 June 2024 17: 53
              How is this not related to the elite? they are our elite...
              1. 0
                11 June 2024 18: 00
                Get involved in bureaucratic circles at the department head level or among the Eastern European branches of large Western companies. There volens-nolens will explain to you who is who. What they tell us are extras from politics or shocking bohemians. Both of them are well-known actors. Our oligarchs are completely a trifle among the world's sharks, and, moreover, they are fairly financially dependent. As long as they are needed here as agents, they are kept afloat, there will be no Russia - they will be flushed down the toilet (not golden).
      2. +4
        11 June 2024 13: 54
        Quote: Alexander Igorevich Rifeev
        our elite will not go to heaven, but will live on sinful earth...

        Maybe there are, to put it mildly, stupid people who believe that they will live well, but the West does not know any mercy towards its enemies and in the event of our defeat, Putin will 100% share the fate of Milosevic, Hussein and Gaddafi.
        1. 0
          11 June 2024 17: 44
          why should the Westerners arrange for him the fate of these three fools who believed in the West... he will be taken out at the last moment... well, like Hitler at the end of April 1945 from Berlin
          1. +1
            11 June 2024 21: 56
            Quote: Alexander Igorevich Rifeev
            why should Westerners arrange for him the fate of these three

            They officially stated this, but they don’t make statements in the wind; if they have the opportunity, they will eliminate it.
    2. +5
      11 June 2024 15: 24
      After the appearance of characters like “Lerchik” and Instasamka at SPIEF, there is nothing left to say about the quality of the elite as a whole. There are words about saving people, giving birth more, and so on,
      but in fact, New Russia under uplifting (as it seems to some) signs like the Ilyin Higher School and so on is described by Instasamka’s couplet at SPIEF
      “We live beautifully.
      This is our goal.
      We don't count money:
      We pump oil"
      .
      1. The comment was deleted.
        1. The comment was deleted.
  19. +3
    11 June 2024 07: 47
    Western politicians are especially striking. In the morning they say one thing, at lunch another, in the evening another.
    A tear welled up. It turns out that “Western politicians” are broadcasting something to someone from morning to evening. Well, there are two options: Western politicians are either the Aliyev brothers, or they are Cheburashka, who has no friends.
    Option 1

    https://youtu.be/IEP1pdnH1kQ

    Option 2

    https://youtu.be/3Xv422UnRJM

    It doesn’t take much intelligence to “put together a puzzle” of current events. The West has actually declared war on Russia. Moscow accepted the challenge. Next comes the time for action. The President of Russia outlined possible directions for these actions at the initial stage. Now the ball is in the West's court. Continue and ultimately lose everything or stop and thus end the conflict in Ukraine.

    Somewhere I’ve already heard all this about “maybe we’ll bang” and “inflexible will”...

    https://youtu.be/3pUbc0pPkEU
  20. +9
    11 June 2024 07: 57
    While the relatives of our elite and money are in the West, the Russian Federation is doomed
    1. 0
      13 June 2024 02: 08
      tell me where your children live and I will tell you which country you really serve.
  21. +10
    11 June 2024 08: 00
    The supply of weapons to countries that are opponents of the United States will not in any way affect the situation on the LBS, but will only calm down some overzealous patriots.

    Actually, this is why such a statement was made.

    But now we can wait for attacks on our territory in full confidence that somewhere someone will take revenge for us by scratching the paint on a US Navy aircraft carrier.
  22. +13
    11 June 2024 08: 06
    The howl in the French media is still echoing across Europe. The point is that Russia declared its right to destroy the enemy on the territory of Ukraine, regardless of which country he is a citizen of.

    The “howl” occurs only in the author’s imagination. Everyone else understands perfectly well that a military man can die in war, and first of all, the military themselves understand this.
  23. +2
    11 June 2024 08: 13
    "So, we have two options. Either the world will change and become different, or it will disappear..."

    Usually people who say this disappear from this world themselves, and those who remain simply make this world a better place from generation to generation to the best of their ability. So it was, so it is and so it will be.

    "What was, it will be; and what has been done, it will be done, and there is nothing new under the sun."
    Ecclesiastes.
  24. +9
    11 June 2024 09: 15
    So we have two options. Either the world will change and become different or disappear...
    It will disappear, but they will go to hell, and we will go to heaven or no longer? In his speech, the President promised that we would get there. Or will it not work out like with the pension reform? smile What about others? Will a child's smile appear on the animalistic grin of capitalism? smile
  25. +6
    11 June 2024 09: 20
    there is a famous phrase: - Yes, be anyone - don’t just be a fool... and our fools still did not understand the difference between war and SVO
  26. +11
    11 June 2024 09: 35
    But the president didn’t say how long Kherson will remain under occupation?
    1. Alf
      +5
      11 June 2024 12: 10
      Quote: vovochkarzhevsky
      But the president didn’t say how long Kherson will remain under occupation?

      This is a military secret, otherwise the enemy will find out and take action.
  27. +3
    11 June 2024 09: 38
    And Hitler clearly set his sights on complete control of the Mediterranean
    The author, why didn’t he capture Gibraltar to begin with? smile
  28. BAI
    +1
    11 June 2024 10: 24
    1.
    The West has actually declared war on Russia.

    It was already announced 2 years ago.
    2. The President of the United States decides NOTHING. This is a manager hired by the shadow government. Biden physically cannot think for himself. Trump was unable to fulfill any of his objectionable promises. Kennedy was simply shot. That's why Obama is the best president of all time
  29. +5
    11 June 2024 11: 09
    No one in the West will save Putin. Either victory or a shameful peace, after which he will have no choice but to resign. Being cursed like Yeltsin.
    1. +6
      11 June 2024 11: 45
      No one in the West will save Putin. Either victory or shameful peace

      “- In general, it’s like this: now I have two ways out of this house - either I take her to the registry office, or she takes me to the prosecutor” (c).
      1. +2
        11 June 2024 12: 55
        Exactly. "Long live the International Criminal Court - the most humane court in the world."
    2. +1
      11 June 2024 18: 01
      will leave in his place a double who will unexpectedly die during a coup or removal from power... his heart there or choking on an apricot kernel at dinner while drinking compote :-) and he himself will quietly fade into the historical shadow
  30. +3
    11 June 2024 11: 18
    Foreign mercenaries and instructors have been massacred in Ukraine for about two years now. There is no sensation in this and I don’t think that anyone in the West has “seen the light” in this regard from the words of GDP.
    Statements about the fact that we will be responsible and “reserve our rights” have been heard for at least a year and a half. This will also not surprise anyone, except perhaps the most retarded or those who fundamentally did not read for 2 years on the topic and did not turn on the zombie box.

    But yes, somewhere they were able to put some pressure, because the French refused to study on the territory of Ukraine, nask. I heard. So it seems like a success. “Sort of” - because PM training is PM training, and long-range missiles are missiles. The issue with missiles has not yet been resolved..
  31. -11
    11 June 2024 11: 29
    Even the people in the comments have become painfully gullible, they are being carried out by bullshit stuffing and they are being dragged here. Why are you making a fuss? We must believe in the guys, victory will be ours. And for everyone who writes decadent comments, you would rather throw a ruble at drones or humanitarian aid than to shake the air.
    1. -1
      11 June 2024 13: 39
      That's it! Victory MUST BE for RUSSIA!!!!
      1. -4
        11 June 2024 14: 09
        Thank you for your support, otherwise the adversaries threw minuses hi
  32. -1
    11 June 2024 11: 55
    There is a game going on, it is called competitive struggle and it is not limited to the confrontation between Russia and the West. The West is also not homogeneous. America is doing everything to take economic control over Europe, lower it and make it completely dependent on energy. That is, the United States does not need a strong Europe. And England was promptly removed from this collective farm from under attack (see Brexit). And there are other states and, most importantly, China. America hardly wants to strengthen the Chinese by destroying Russia. And China clearly understands that after Russia is destroyed, they will be 100% next! And even more so, the Baltics, Poland, the Czech Republic will not cost a penny... not to mention the countries of the former USSR... In general, everything is simple and complex at the same time. The fall of Russia will break the geopolitical map and economically destroy the entire world. Only the shaved ones and the Americans can benefit, but who will give them...
  33. 0
    11 June 2024 12: 12
    If the world is engulfed in nuclear war, who will die first - Russians and Ukrainians. Who benefits from this - as always, the Americans. Has GDP really done everything to prevent this from happening?
    1. -3
      11 June 2024 13: 32
      First of all, the Americans and Russians will die, Russia will immediately hit the center of decision-making, that is, the States, well, maybe England will also fall, and only then the rest of the sisters....
  34. +4
    11 June 2024 12: 49
    Quote from Arifon
    And China clearly understands that after Russia is destroyed, they will be 100% next!


    Not a fact, far from a fact. Rather, China is laying claim to part of Russia's inheritance. Today he is acquiring all the benefits of our position - from economic to political.

    Russia is becoming a supplier of inexpensive resources and a consumer of Chinese products in conditions where we have no one else to trade with, and China has no such restrictions.

    Russia is increasingly falling into the wake of China's policy as a stronger player and a more powerful economic partner, since we no longer cooperate with any of the great powers, and China is free to choose its partners.
    1. -2
      11 June 2024 13: 34
      “Not a fact, far from a fact. Rather, China is laying claim to part of Russia’s inheritance...”
      What's not a fact?! What did I write?
      I write that the collapse of Russia will strengthen China, and the Americans definitely don’t need this.
  35. 0
    11 June 2024 13: 37
    Unfortunately, everything in the article is logical... It’s time to understand that the West, under the leadership of Fashington, never wanted normal relations with Russia, despite the fact that it also became a capitalist country.
    The West has never understood the lesson of history and this Western stupidity is clearly leading to something very bad...
    1. 0
      14 June 2024 18: 23
      On the contrary, the West forced our society to perceive the abnormal as normal: to endure the division of their country supposedly “for the sake of the transition to capitalism and democracy”, which is generally nonsense.
      And now the West has forced us, former citizens of one country, to beat each other..... Which is complete madness.
  36. +1
    11 June 2024 13: 52
    Strange conclusions; attributing everything to personalities in the USA - Biden, and in Ukraine - Zelensky, in my opinion, is naive. These are not the people who make decisions and implement them. A very indicative example is the agreements reached in Turkey, the signing of binding documents, and then the visit of former British Prime Minister Johnson to Kyiv, and the agreements are in the dustbin of history. Everything is somewhat more complicated.
  37. 0
    11 June 2024 13: 59
    Is that a cho?
    Another explanation? Scarecrow?
    We have been officially bombing Ukraine for 2,5 years, and then it dawned on the author: “War has been declared on us...”
    You can say directly, like Goblin-Puchkov: it was Ukraine that attacked Russia. That's all. no other explanation is needed.
  38. 0
    11 June 2024 14: 42
    The media and media in general in the broad sense (now this is the “political telegram”) usually reflect a set of opinions at the very top. It is not always naturally the same (there are towers everywhere), but this way you can track the internal discussion. And looking at this, one gets the strong impression that we have a formed team of “Trumpists”, i.e. a common layer of elite and “experts” who are clearly or not very much in favor of the so-called. “Trump’s victory” - that is, a large group of elites (not only in Russia) who put this character on their shield.

    Meanwhile, it is Trump’s victory, if God forbid it happens, that brings us
    A) a natural defeat in the Northern Military District, but at the same time B) the resource elites will win, since Trump is literally a reflection and expression of the resource-based economic paradigm.

    All this is very dangerous. The fact is that it seems that we do not notice (or categorically do not want to notice) the fact that the EU and the USA will be a single space in the future. Britain left the EU so as not to be in a state of direct dependence and to build its own projects and subprojects. Lindy Graham said that Ukraine has "$12-13 trillion in mineral resources." And what, does someone want to say that Trump, a commodity producer, doesn’t know this?

    The fact that the EU is being “lowered” economically is a tactical maneuver, since the Chinese economy is being suppressed in this way, but the US will never let the solvent and politically controlled EU markets out of its hands. But pumping up the EU and Eastern Europe with weapons to capacity, dispersing his military-industrial complex, Trump will do this with ease. And a war in Eastern Europe with Russia will also suit them, since then it will ultimately be another “Marshall Plan”, but in the medium term, again, China is moving to the side, and the US economy, on the contrary, is becoming more tied to Europe on its own terms.

    Watch with great concern those who promote “Trump’s victory” in our media. Some are doing this due to the general trend, others are really convinced that Trump “wants to leave the EU and the Middle East”, speak out against China and focus “not on himself”, such as an isolationist. But behind all this there is a good calculation of a certain part of the media commissioners and the oligarchy. A raw materials producer with a hegemonic raw materials program cannot be an isolationist, much less leave one of the world’s main energy markets—the EU.
  39. -1
    14 June 2024 05: 06
    Quote: Sergey Boretsky
    Oh, you’re crazy, my friend, together with your crazy sister, who’s stopping you from taking pictures of one ballot from different angles and sending it out to the authorities from hundreds of people? When you lie, at least think with your head sometimes.