Vladimir Putin and Hillary Clinton's precepts

88
President Vladimir Putin, in his speech at an extended colleague of the FSB, among other issues raised the issue of integration in the post-Soviet space. More precisely, he touched not so much the integration process in the said territory, but the question that there are enough forces in the world today ready to do everything to insert as many sticks as possible into the wheels of the integration processes.

Vladimir Putin expressed the words that “integration and the post-Soviet space cannot be stopped by any shouting and withdrawal”. The President of the Russian Federation called the integration itself an objective and global process, and all the words about the negative economic and political association in which Russia and a number of CIS countries are participating are emotional rhetoric.

A number of "well-wishers" immediately dubbed the presidential promise complete non-possession of information. Like, what is Putin talking about? Perhaps, he had in mind that disintegration was observed in the post-Soviet space, but he made a reservation, and the journalists simply replicated the reservation. They say what kind of integration we can talk about when Russia in recent years managed to lose contacts or reduce these contacts to a minimum with a number of post-Soviet countries: Georgia, the Baltic states, Uzbekistan and even Ukraine. This, they say, Putin is trying with all his might to declare himself as a person who wants, but cannot reanimate, a large country that has for centuries been a threat to progressive and unconditionally democratic Western civilization.

However, this rhetoric of the "well-wishers" fits perfectly into the words expressed by Mrs. Clinton at the peak (or is it still exhausted) of her foreign policy career. The former US Secretary of State, as soon as the tendency towards integration among the CIS countries was indicated, said that she, she said, immediately saw through Moscow. In her opinion, Moscow is trying to create a second version of the Soviet Union, which it (Moscow) will cover with various names (the Customs Union, the Eurasian Union), but this will not change the essence of the totalitarian state for the suspicious Mrs. Clinton. At the same time, the secretary of state also added that we (that is, they) would try to find effective ways to slow down this process or to prevent it completely.

Hillary Clinton has already freed up the armchair of the Secretary of State for John Kerry, but hardly anything has changed in the plans of those whom she spoke of, mentioning the pronoun “we”. Obviously, the new leadership of the US State Secretariat (analogous to the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs) will continue to do everything that is in the power of this department in order to prevent neighboring countries from being able to move towards full-fledged integration in terms of spirit and spirit.

It was this continuation of the foreign policy of the United States that President Putin had in mind when he spoke at the board of the FSB. It is obvious that a sufficient number of people for that (and not only) side of the Atlantic will have many reasons to counter the unification processes within the CIS. Much more productive for our “partners” to promote is the idea that it is time for the CIS to put a big cross. One goal: to sow another grain of contention in the post-Soviet space, announcing attempts to restore the "prison of nations" and the "evil empire." After all, as you know, in order to separate, no extraordinary effort is needed. It is enough to use salt in our “productive work”, which at the right moment will abundantly fall in the wounds of citizens of Russia and other former Soviet republics. More - and not necessary. Wounds will be eroded, and the body will weaken. Here it is - a short way to achieve the goal from those who in no way wish to return to the era of full geopolitical competition, consoling themselves with the fact that they are the agents of a bright capitalist future.

No - no one is going to argue with the fact that the post-Soviet space is full of problems between countries, including problems of a bilateral nature. These are Russia and Georgia, Azerbaijan and Armenia, Tajikistan and Uzbekistan, Moldova and Transnistria. However, any problems are actually solved. And they are solved exclusively without external "help". All of the above states can quite independently figure out the direction in which they will go further. The main thing is to step over our mania and phobias, to assess the prospects for economic cooperation with each other. But as soon as the “helper” equals distant from all the participants in the process of possible integration, the leaping scabbard begins: someone breaks into the clouds, someone backs away, and someone stubbornly pulls into the water ...

Of course, there will be an army of pessimists who will certainly declare that the train, they say, has left, and today none of the former Soviet republics intends to enter into close economic contacts with the same Russia. Like, it is not fashionable and not productive. Another thing is the European Union, another thing is yakshaniya with the United States and the rest of the “progressive fraternity”, which selects friends so that there is someone to serve the national debt ...

So, it turns out that listening to the nonsense about the restoration of the "totalitarian state that threatens the world" is more productive? Or is it more productive to live next to a neighbor and, holding a big gem of regional policy in the bosom, rejoice at the praises from the Big Overseas Brother: you do everything right, the small Central Asian (Caucasian, Chisinau, Kiev, and the list goes on) brother ...

Does anyone still have illusions about the fact that the delimitation under someone’s external tune will bring undoubtedly positive fruits. So for 22, it seems that it did not bring ... Or someone thinks that he began to live better only after his state declared its independence ... There are such people, however, and there are a lot of them ... And there are those who think that counterproductive is not only economic integration in the spaces of the former USSR, but even increased contacts between regions within Russia. Apparently, brainwashing in the style of the same suspicious Hillary Clinton continues to do his job ...

No matter how trite it sounds, but in matters of the same economic integration, everything is in our hands. Most sensible people, both in Russia and in neighboring states, understand that economic integration is a big step towards each other, a big step towards overcoming a whole range of problems, including bilateral ones. So what's the deal? Or does Hillary’s covenants and others seem more important to someone? ..
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

88 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +14
    19 February 2013 09: 43
    Russia has always been a bone in their throat, different talkers and talkers can talk whatever they want, you have to look at things, but they are not attractive for Western "democracy".
    1. calculator
      +5
      19 February 2013 09: 48
      In our all-Russian boiler, and so much is abandoned, to digest what is. No, not against integration, FOR, but .... nevertheless, some aspects will need to be reviewed
      1. w.ebdo.g
        +38
        19 February 2013 09: 52
        a little off topic, but ...

        1. +12
          19 February 2013 10: 17
          For the video +++++++++++ how they grumbled when Vova asked
          1. w.ebdo.g
            +24
            19 February 2013 11: 08
            another interesting video)))
            just afigels in general ...

            1. +1
              19 February 2013 11: 28
              Quote: w.ebdo.g
              another interesting video)))
              just afigels in general ...


              what's the point? as they stole, they will until the authorities want to resolve this issue.
            2. +4
              19 February 2013 12: 11
              and thank you for this video and ++++ I liked the phrase: "from $ 1,2 billion turned into $ 8 billion, well done, you work well ...." it would be so funny if it weren't so sad.
            3. 0
              19 February 2013 15: 57
              yeah ... after watching 2 higher videos, I propose to Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin the following outcome and parting words to actions of the following nature:

              http://topwar.ru/24391-vladimir-putin-i-zavety-hillari-klinton.html#
            4. +7
              19 February 2013 15: 58
              Yeah...

              that is what should happen at a private meeting between Vladimir Putin and the same people after visiting the Olympic venues in Sochi.
              In a short video by Mifune Toshiro as Putin. (it’s immediately clear in whose place Putin should be am )

              1. +13
                19 February 2013 16: 50
                Quote: silver_roman
                this is what should happen at a closed meeting of Vladimir Putin
                1. 0
                  19 February 2013 17: 07
                  Something I did not fully understand your post! please explain! request
                  1. +6
                    19 February 2013 18: 45
                    Quote: silver_roman
                    Something I did not fully understand your post! please explain!


                    hint that it’s time to remove criminals with a hot iron from society, public executions of embezzlers as in China, I think will rectify the situation.
                    hi
                    1. +3
                      19 February 2013 19: 06
                      In this I fully support you! drinks
              2. 0
                20 February 2013 15: 46
                Thanks for the video, huge respect to you =)
            5. +1
              19 February 2013 22: 45
              another interesting video))))

              "This is called an interrogation pattern. This is just exemplary ..."
              No, Vladimir is a sample of leasing on your part and a sample of public relations on the part of the President.

              "We begin so softly .... hinting", "The first signs of a heart attack in Kozak", "Kozak dreams of dissolving," ".... that is, that under the noses of these people there are ACTIONS of this size, and it takes Putin to come and figured it out? And that's just. Excuse me, seven billion on roller coasters alone? EG-GKHE-E! Do you understand, dear friends ... "

              Sorry, but here I was sick ... these videos need to be censored because of too naturalistic portrayed intimate scenes. If Solovyov really wants to lick, then this is his business, but putting this out on public display is too much.
              The following are rhetorical questions which, as you know, do not require answers.
              For years, everyone looked somewhere in the wrong direction until the GDP came and opened his eyes to everyone.

              Classes! Well done, Vladimir! All around and to blame for everything, and only two Vladimir, Solovyov and Putin are worried about Russia.
              1. 0
                20 February 2013 01: 12
                Quote: Normal
                Classes! Well done, Vladimir! All around and to blame for everything, and only two Vladimir, Solovyov and Putin are worried about Russia.


                I have no illusions about Putin - but actually who are you to make mega-expert judgments? How many people did you personally manage and how did it end?
                1. +4
                  20 February 2013 08: 39
                  Quote: Karlsonn
                  actually who you are

                  A visitor to the site who has an opinion. It is forbidden?
                  In order to have an opinion on the statements of public people, you need to be a leader?
                  The meaning of your post is not clear. What hurt you? The fact that my opinion does not coincide with the majority opinion (with your opinion) or that I, as a leader, have the audacity to express it? Please explain. Yes, I almost forgot; What exactly do you call the MegaExpert judgment?
                  1. +1
                    20 February 2013 18: 21
                    Yes, no one forbids you, you just need to look at the situation in the political field of Russia more widely and not superficially. At present, the initial phase of Putin’s war against the West is unfolding. An element of this war is the breaking of the SYSTEM planted and debugged by the Americans in the 90s, and managed by them until now.
                    Putin has a special services asset, the army, the presidency’s apparatus, against the SYSTEM,
                    conscious or unconscious cogs which are state. officials. Corruption in the SYSTEM is stimulated by the Washington Regional Committee in the form
                    providing them with reliable channels for transferring financial flows from embezzlement to Western banks and grants of non-return after these bugs flee to the West. The interest of the West in this scheme is that it is one of the channels for fueling the global parasite of the United States. The SYSTEM's strength is that it has state laws ,
                    even the constitution of the Russian Federation drawn up in the 90s by the Anglo-Saxons. In general, this is a long topic, for interest look at E. Fedorov on okkupantu.net, or on cognitive TV. What he reveals is only a small fraction.
                    1. Octavian avgust
                      +2
                      20 February 2013 20: 48
                      Yes you are right. It is necessary to break the American system inside Russia and cleanse the country of mishandled Cossacks. First of all, in the information space! good
                2. 0
                  22 February 2013 10: 56
                  Quote: Karlsonn
                  I have no illusions about Putin - but actually who are you to make mega-expert judgments?
                  Damn, what kind of argument ...? For whom are you so offended?
                  Quote: Karlsonn
                  How many people did you personally manage and how did it end?
                  What are you talking about? Want to talk about governance goals and the principles by which they are achieved? I think you will not like this topic. If a relative of a tough leader served in the army as a battalion commander, then this is not a reason, let's say, to consider himself a "Megaexpert" in matters of management.
            6. +2
              20 February 2013 16: 06
              you need to do something damn it!
          2. +4
            19 February 2013 13: 39
            Ah, especially this one, which allegedly dried out a billion, I thought he would send Vova to hell! I would have called the security in Lefortovo until the reasons were clarified, I would have found everything right away! angry
        2. slvevg
          +10
          19 February 2013 10: 40
          I was struck by Putin's calmness: "and where are these figures? Abroad already?" Dumping over the hill has already become a habitual norm for officials who steal. Something Vova is carrying out a strange cleaning! He stole, run, don't stick your nose back! And where is the refund, real landings? Or only military pensioners ostentatiously to poke a muzzle into the onnoe righteous? request
          1. w.ebdo.g
            +16
            19 February 2013 12: 40
            slvevg, something you can not please in any way. Putin does not purge - bad. Conducts - all the same bad. You already decide in the end. Or you have nothing to write about ... (well, yes, for this you need a thought, moreover, your own ...)
            You should deprive Putin of the kick at any convenient and not convenient case ...

            You are a demagogue.

            Thanks for attention.

            DEMAGOG (ordinary):
            1. +10
              19 February 2013 14: 18
              Quote: w.ebdo.g
              Putin does not purge - bad. Conducts - all the same bad.


              Quote: w.ebdo.g
              You should deprive Putin of the kick at any convenient and not convenient case ...


              in fact, you gave a description of the entire Russian "intelligentsia" for the entire period of its existence.


              Quote: w.ebdo.g
              You are a demagogue.


              Lenin spoke more strongly laughing

              "The intelligentsia is not the brain of the nation, but its shit" VI Lenin.


              Quote: w.ebdo.g
              DEMAGOG (ordinary):
              1. imperiologist
                +6
                19 February 2013 15: 42
                The famous words of Lenin, who allegedly wrote "The intelligentsia is not the brain of the nation, but its shit" actually look like this:

                From a letter of A.M. Gorky of September 15, 1919:

                It is wrong to confuse the "intellectual forces" of the people with the "forces" of the bourgeois intellectuals. I will take Korolenko as a model: I recently read his, written in August 1917, brochure "War, Fatherland and Humanity". Korolenko is, after all, the best of the "near-Kadets", almost a Menshevik. And what a vile, vile, vile defense of the imperialist war, covered with corny phrases! A pitiful philistine, captivated by bourgeois prejudices! For such gentlemen, 10 killed in the imperialist war? cause worthy of support (deeds, with corny phrases "against" the war), and the death of hundreds of thousands in a just civil war against landlords and capitalists causes ah, ooh, sighs, hysteria. The intellectual forces of the workers and peasants are growing and gaining strength in the struggle to overthrow the bourgeoisie and its accomplices, intellectuals, lackeys of capital, who imagine themselves to be the brain of the nation. In fact, this is not a brain, but shit. We pay above average salaries to the "intellectual forces" who want to bring science to the people (and not serve capital). It is a fact. We protect them. It is a fact. Tens of thousands of officers are serving in the Red Army and are winning in spite of hundreds of traitors. It is a fact...
                1. +1
                  19 February 2013 16: 51
                  Quote: imperiolist
                  The famous words of Lenin, who allegedly wrote "The intelligentsia is not the brain of the nation, but its shit" actually look like this:


                  Thank you, I know. hi
                  1. 0
                    22 February 2013 11: 47
                    Quote: Karlsonn
                    Thank you, I know.
                    It is wrong to confuse the "intellectual forces" of the people with the "forces" of the bourgeois intellectuals. ... "
                    Sly however. I still put it very gently.
            2. imperiologist
              +5
              19 February 2013 15: 37
              let no one say that it’s a bad thing! well, he doesn’t do it! he’s not planted one is not shot, he’s a scumbag bastard in the Baltic states with his wife. Serdyuk also doesn’t cough, he goes to visit his women with thirty-room apartments and the secretary stealing a billion? you can’t even talk about Berezovskiy Abramovich and other oligarch bros, you can only with trepidation and aspiration and so that no one inadvertently speaks, everything was different in Soviet times. It’s enough to reinvent the wheel and adapt to the shitty geyropui to return some articles and laws which worked so well for decades.
            3. 0
              22 February 2013 11: 41
              Quote: w.ebdo.g
              ... Or you have nothing to write about ... (well, yes, for this you need a thought, moreover, your own ...) ... You are a demagogue.
              From you, too, something did not come any analysis on the position ... no proposals for action ... Or do you deny the fact that the authorities are guided by the principle - "no face - no business and no business about the face ..."? And when there are no arguments, you hang a label on your opponent. This is a purely demagogic technique, however ...
        3. gordeew_alr
          +8
          19 February 2013 10: 56
          If we bear in mind the entire reportage about the meeting, then the SABOTAGE of the leaders and their unacceptable blatant rudeness are obvious. So the media showed that these "leaders" are the impudent "six" of Uncle Sam.
          And the conclusion is obvious who is fighting for Russia and who is selling it.
          1. Kaa
            +4
            19 February 2013 13: 19
            Quote: gordeew_alr
            So the media showed that these "leaders" are the impudent "six" of Uncle Sam.
            And the conclusion is obvious who is fighting for Russia and who is selling it.

            Quote: slvevg
            Something Vova is cleaning strange!

            Quote: Veter
            what's the point? as they stole, they will be

            Well, where did you get this, gentlemen? Thinner, thinner you need! "
          2. +9
            19 February 2013 15: 08
            Quote: gordeew_alr
            .... obvious sabotage of managers and their unacceptable undisguised rudeness ....

            Yeah, it is.
            And now let's remember the Stalinist "repressions". Who can say, in such a situation, what is left for the leader of the country to do ?! If he is not indifferent to her fate, of course?

            Imagine for a moment what a liberal stench will rise if Putin starts to act as it should be: the manager stole 7 billion - he was sent to a dungeon, a case to the prosecutor's office, court and exile. Especially presumptuous - "tower" for especially large thefts.

            In the age of state-run media, Putin simply cannot act like Stalin, efficiently and quickly.
            Alas, he will first have to collect the evidence base in each case, then bring the fact of embezzlement to the surface of public opinion, and only when the "human rights activists" can no longer shout about the "innocent victims of the bloody regime" or leave for political persecution - only after that will Putin be able to achieve justice over thieves in ties.
            And the task of the organs remains so that the "under development" ones do not give the tree outside the borders of their beloved Motherland, while the whole process goes on ...

            But something begins to seem to me that Putin will succeed.
            Somehow, the news in this direction has been going on densely and thematically recently.
            1. zavesa01
              0
              19 February 2013 16: 28
              Unfortunately, as you can see, not everyone can evaluate things objectively. And it’s very good that people like you can at least get a little hot on your head.
            2. +1
              19 February 2013 19: 28
              Quote: Skating rink
              Alas, he will first have to collect the evidence base in each case, then bring the fact of embezzlement to the surface of public opinion, and only when the "human rights activists" can no longer shout about the "innocent victims of the bloody regime" or leave for political persecution - only after that will Putin be able to achieve justice over thieves in ties.
              Do you think that the theft of billions is deeply conspired? one-day firms, accounts - if desired, all this can be raised in days - who, whom, how much. the system will break any lover, and the state is the most complex system. someone smart said: if you think that life is simple, in fact it is even simpler. I don’t remember the exact quote. need desire and will. and our power demonstrates only words.
            3. gordeew_alr
              -1
              19 February 2013 23: 41
              Do not confuse one with the other. Do you need justification for the new bloodshed of the Russian people? So partners are only happy to be in this turn of events. Today, different realities and a different story. And the most powerful weapon in it is the unity of the people, and not the confusion that prevails today.
              In this impudence not even a minister manifests a system of theft of Russia. And since the system, then the system needs to be opposed to it. If this is a system of betrayal, betrayal and theft, then it needs to be opposed with a system that needs to be re-created, a system of fidelity to the motherland, the unity of the people, the honesty of conscientious work and a prudent attitude to the country's economy. And this is not a requirement only from those who occupy high offices, but on all floors of the vertical where we are present - the citizens of Russia.
              What exactly can we do? Well, they were able to create a popular militia after the revolution. Why not take a creative approach to this problem and find measures for the prudent organization of state power from the very bottom and control over it?
              1. walter_rus
                +1
                20 February 2013 15: 55
                Of course, the unity of the people is needed. Only the unity of whom? the oligarch and workers whom he threw into the street? the official and visitors whom he keeps in lines and chases after tens of references?
                Quote: gordeew_alr
                Why not take a creative approach to this problem and find measures for the prudent organization of state power from the very bottom and control over it?

                Beautifully said, only who will do it? Nobody will allow the people, but the authorities do not need this. But still, the government must meet the people, until the bloodshed has begun, and for now it only wants to tighten the screws on the people.
            4. 755962
              +1
              20 February 2013 01: 20
              Quote: Skating rink
              In the age of state-run media

              How do you like this ...

              10 witnesses who died under mysterious circumstances

              In this article, we will talk about ten famous witnesses whose unexpected death led to the emergence of new conspiracy theories.

              http://mixednews.ru/archives/30564

              Here she is .... "Democracy" in the American way ..
          3. +2
            20 February 2013 18: 26
            I completely agree with you.
        4. orkibotu
          0
          19 February 2013 13: 11
          Vladimir Putin anneals!)))
        5. Steering wheel
          0
          19 February 2013 15: 14
          Quote: w.ebdo.g
          a little off topic but
          Look at the general intrview of General Ivashov about the Jewish-liberal fifth column
          http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=HQHEhaxFeH0
        6. 0
          19 February 2013 22: 10
          "You waited for them to steal billions there, yes, and then you started making decisions. Couldn't it have been done earlier?"

          Vladimir Vladimirovich, such infa:
          "5 trillion rubles have also been withdrawn from Russia illegally recently," Major General of Police Denis Sugrobov, head of the Main Directorate for Economic Security and Combating Corruption (GUEBiPK) of the Russian Interior Ministry, said on Monday.
          expert.ru/20011/08/15/mutnyij-potok/

          If my memory serves me, you were then prime minister, and then became president again. So what? All this time you have been waiting for them to steal there and take TRILLIONS out of the country, and now you "make decisions"?
          It was impossible to do this before? What are missing victims?
          Come visit us, Vladimir Vladimirovich. Get out of your limousine and "walk in" to the people of Russia. We will now find victims ...

          “For a long time, you understand something very much. A billion was stolen from you, so, a billion in this way went to dummy offices where two people work, a billion simply disappeared, and you still understand and do not consider it necessary to protect the interests of the company .. . "

          Vladimir Vladimirovich, you have been in power for so many years that a generation has grown that does not remember anyone else in power. They dragged out during this time not a billion, but tens, if not hundreds of TRILLIONS. You do not understand there very long? Not? Well .... we are patient, we will wait
          1. -3
            19 February 2013 22: 15
            Quote: Normal
            If my memory serves me, you were then prime minister, and then became president again. So what? All this time you have been waiting for them to steal there and take TRILLIONS out of the country, and now you "make decisions"?
            1. 0
              20 February 2013 18: 35
              Poor crafts, in the style of morons from the State Department.
            2. Natalia
              +1
              23 February 2013 21: 02
              atalef:
              Well, Nooooo, not a very good joke ..... Putin is still well done. The mighty president.
          2. w.ebdo.g
            -4
            20 February 2013 00: 19
            Normal, did your tantrum happen?
            tantrums to face only women ...
            pull yourself together, citizen, and stop making nonsense.
            otherwise the children from elementary grades will laugh at you))

            tantrum (ordinary):
            1. +2
              20 February 2013 08: 11
              Quote: w.ebdo.g

              Normal, did your tantrum happen?

              negative I don’t, but you? In fact, there is something to argue? If not, then there is nothing to arrange srach and pass on to the person. You have no arguments, only evaluative statements:
              Quote: w.ebdo.g
              DEMAGOG (ordinary):

              Quote: w.ebdo.g
              tantrum (ordinary):

              In my opinion, you just fit your own definitions fool .
              1. w.ebdo.g
                -3
                20 February 2013 08: 54
                Normal.
                citizen, calm down. Stop hysteria and pull yourself together.
                what do you have with nerves?
                especially for the most impatient, in my profile there is a link to my contact. come in, tell me everything you think about me)))
                and the site does not need to arrange discussions with transitions to the individual ...
                here we discuss completely different topics.
                Come talk to me.

                Thanks for attention.
                1. 0
                  20 February 2013 12: 32
                  w.ebdo.g
                  Especially for you again:
                  Quote: Normal
                  In fact, there is something to argue? If not, then there is nothing to arrange srach and go to the individual

                  Examples of the fact that it’s YOU who switch to personality:
                  Quote: w.ebdo.g
                  DEMAGOG (ordinary)

                  Quote: w.ebdo.g
                  tantrum (ordinary)

                  Quote: w.ebdo.g
                  pull yourself together, citizen, and stop making nonsense.

                  Quote: w.ebdo.g
                  citizen, calm down. Stop hysteria and pull yourself together.
                  what do you have with nerves?

                  When you find something similar in me then you can say:
                  Quote: w.ebdo.g
                  and the site does not need to arrange discussions with transitions to the individual ...

                  In the meantime, it is you who organize tantrums and become personal. You do not lead a discussion, do not bring any arguments, you cannot object in essence; instead, you have attempts to insult, humiliate your opponent and baseless value judgments about people whom you do not know and have never seen.
                  Quote: w.ebdo.g
                  here we discuss completely different topics.

                  That is, you determine that there is a discussion of the topic (your statements and support of your opinion), and that there is demagogy and hysteria (opinions different from yours, or directly opposite to yours) You can accuse me of a tantrum for the third time, but I do not agree with you .
                  Quote: w.ebdo.g
                  especially for the most impatient, in my profile there is a link to my contact. come in, tell me everything you think about me)))

                  You are too fixated on yourself. I did not give you definitions (unlike you), I did not speak out about your psycho-emotional state (unlike you). I don’t care about you at all. I just criticized the content and off-screen text of the videos posted by you. In response, I get mockery and rudeness. If this is your public communication style, then there’s no point in contacting you.

                  Thank you for attention.
                  1. w.ebdo.g
                    -2
                    20 February 2013 17: 38
                    Normal.
                    Eka drummed you ... and such scientific words used)))
                    but you just had to not be ashamed to go to the office, talk, find consensus ...
                    He offered you to discuss everything peacefully. but you hysteria again. this behavior is characteristic only of women)))
                    I no longer see the point of talking with you and fighting your hysteria ...

                    Thank you.
                    1. 0
                      20 February 2013 17: 57
                      Quote: w.ebdo.g
                      I see no reason to talk to you and fight your hysteria ..
                      Similarly. Fight YOUR hysteria
      2. +4
        19 February 2013 10: 01
        Quote: calculator
        In our common Russian boiler, and so much is abandoned

        You just need to think about who and why it was abandoned. There were no extra lands and peoples in our "cauldron", although it would be better to send some rotten individuals somewhere with a kick in the ass.
        1. calculator
          +5
          19 February 2013 10: 15
          I’m talking about this .... God bless Russia! 3 years in Tajikistan gave me the right to say so, even if not in war ...
      3. +2
        20 February 2013 16: 53
        Online
        RU calculator Yesterday, 09:48 In our all-Russian boiler, and so much is abandoned, it would be to digest what is. No, not against integration, FOR, but .... nevertheless, some aspects will need to be reviewed
        I do not agree with you, Russia at the genetic level is idealizing itself within the borders of the Russian Empire, and the economic, military level of today's Russia can serve as the foundation of the revival process. For starters though
        integration of the former republics of the USSR. Moreover, such participants in this process as Kazakhstan, Belarus, and to some extent Ukraine have sufficient economic potential so as not to be a burden.
    2. w.ebdo.g
      0
      19 February 2013 09: 51
      a little off topic, but ...

      [media = http: //youtu.be/NDEEqny5jKI]
    3. +9
      19 February 2013 09: 51
      From time immemorial there is an unshakable truth: POWER IN ONE.
      Equally ancient is the principle: divide and conquer.
      Surely someone still hasn’t understood something? Who wants good for Russia, and who wants something completely different ?!
      1. calculator
        +1
        19 February 2013 09: 58
        Yes, Russia wants good .... And what do those who want to Russia want?
      2. Yoshkin Kot
        +3
        19 February 2013 10: 16
        but UNITY is needed, not parasites on the body of Russia
    4. Yoshkin Kot
      +1
      19 February 2013 09: 59
      unfortunately, twice in that century they were able to tell us (bone) I hope in this century we will not deliver such joy to them
      1. ughhh
        +1
        19 February 2013 10: 35
        Yoshkin Cat,
        And each time Russia returned (, - is) more and more magnificent. And more and more enemies scared. The power of Russia scared even friends, from which all the problems went.
        But they have no choice, wah ha ha haaa! (* laughing homerily and scratching his hairy chest).
    5. yak69
      +4
      19 February 2013 11: 25
      "" ".... Or someone thinks that he began to live better only after his state declared its independence ... There are, however, such people ...." "" "

      Such "people" are called THIEFS, BANDITS, CHAUVINISTS, CORRUPTIONS, BANKERS and OLIGARCHS.
      And all this jackal pack called LIBERASTI !!
  2. sashka
    -6
    19 February 2013 09: 55
    Kay "jerk" ...
  3. +4
    19 February 2013 09: 58
    They say a lot, from high stands, from TV screens. They speak beautifully, they already take it for the soul, so you think, a little more, a little effort and we will live happily ....... they just say a lot, but do little! When it comes to personal interests, when someone else is trying to fit in and limit power, then they say little and do a lot .... for their loved ones!
    1. predator.3
      +12
      19 February 2013 10: 10
      Yes, to hell with her, with this Clinton, yesterday was the news that
      The son-in-law (husband of the sister) of the former Minister of Defense of the Russian Federation Anatoly Serdyukov Valery Puzikov, who is suspected of involvement in fraud in the Ministry of Defense, is located outside of Russia. About this on Monday, February 18, writes "Nezavisimaya Gazeta", referring to a source in the military justice. According to the interlocutor of the publication, Puzikov and other alleged members of the scam in the military department, who also went abroad, will be charged in absentia.

      Hence the question: Who released it? and where did the FSB look?
      1. Xtra1l
        +4
        19 February 2013 10: 29
        In recent years, they have generally been working poorly and not only they, if television does work for them
      2. ughhh
        +4
        19 February 2013 10: 38
        If they run away, then the information field has reached such an intensity that people begin to fear for their own skin. So, you see, it will come to the point that people will be afraid to steal.
        If necessary, they will give out, they will not go anywhere.
        1. +2
          19 February 2013 19: 31
          Yes, to hell with this field. Where is the money, Zin?
        2. +1
          20 February 2013 01: 18
          Quote: ughhh
          If necessary, they will give out, they will not go anywhere.

          There is no issue with the Thames
      3. 0
        19 February 2013 10: 44
        yeah, and also Rogozin, relatives of Livanov
      4. +2
        19 February 2013 14: 11
        Quote: predator.3
        Puzikov and other alleged members of the military department fraud, who also went abroad, will be charged in absentia.

        And you also need the court to be in absentia and the verdict pronounced in absentia. and executed (as with Trotsky, as with Bandera). Then the state will begin to respect and steal ... no, they will not stop, but they will be much less ...
      5. zavesa01
        +1
        19 February 2013 16: 33
        Suspected or delayed? Maybe arrested? 100% proof no means free. Principles of democracy !! am Otherwise, human rights defenders will raise high all over the world. Therefore, they manage to blame them at once in those states which will lay down with bones but we ....... x will not be given out to Russia.
      6. -1
        19 February 2013 22: 25
        An interesting train of thought .... You are offering on suspicion in the involvement of someone to arrest all relatives, near and far, from small to large? Let me remind you whether a person is guilty or not - the court determines. Or do you want to judge a person and his whole family by media publications that do not belong to us? Can he immediately send all the relatives of the officials to the Gulag, so ... just in case, what would happen if they didn’t run away?
        1. walter_rus
          0
          20 February 2013 16: 11
          Do not throw in the Gulag, but at least prohibit travel abroad. And then the Investigative Committee rolls thunder and lightning, which obviously will not reach the goal. If you forget to pay the fine for a minor violation, you’ll be wrapped up at the airport, and the suspect of corruption will be green (it’s recently even turned out that Tsapkov’s gang member went abroad and the investigators didn’t see anything wrong with that).
      7. 0
        20 February 2013 23: 00
        Well, the face, only 9 grams in the back of the head is missing.
  4. +1
    19 February 2013 10: 03
    "Progressive brethren", who is this? And these are homosexuals and lesbians? Or crazy Clintons? If you have brains, it is not difficult to understand what "friendship" means with this rabble ... I think the countries which have already "made friends" an example for you ...
  5. +11
    19 February 2013 10: 06
    quote-No matter how trite it sounds, but in matters of the same economic integration all in our hands. Most sane people and in Russia and in neighboring states understand that economic integration is a big step towards each other, a big step to overcome a whole range of problems, including bilateral ones. So what is the cause? Or to some, the precepts of Hillary and others like her seem more important? ..


    Alex, thanks for the article hi

    The questions you have raised are as relevant as ever. Turning to your quote, everything is in our hands. That's it. This site was created just for this. It is we who should, to the best of our ability and ability, carry to the masses and campaign, not limited to comments on the forum. They read us not only in Russia, they read us throughout the post-Soviet space. I believe that we are preachers of integration processes. The articles laid out here and comments serve as a counterbalance to the US policy on the disintegration of the CIS countries. Our forum serves as a response to unannounced information I’m fighting a war against us. Guests of the forum, reading analytical articles published on the forum and our comments, draw the necessary conclusions for themselves. We are not just talking and exchanging our opinions, we are trying to convey our aspirations to our readers on those issues that would serve as a cementing factor to association.
  6. fenix57
    +16
    19 February 2013 10: 16
    Mrs. Clinton was at that time, "in the fall mode", which is why she behaved inadequately. There will be everything and the Customs Union and the Eurasian soybean, there is no getting away from this And the leaders of the countries of the former Soviet republics will understand this if they do not want to be "litters "the Anglo-Saxons ... hi This process cannot be stopped.
  7. +6
    19 February 2013 10: 20
    "Like, what kind of integration can we talk about, when in recent years Russia has managed to lose contacts or reduce these contacts to a minimum with a number of post-Soviet countries: Georgia, the Baltic states, Uzbekistan and even Ukraine."

    There are former republics that objectively in the near foreseeable future will not integrate in the post-Soviet space, this is the Baltic states. There are plainly undecided people who do not yet understand that besides ourselves we are not needed by anyone in the world, this is the same Ukraine and Georgia. There are those who are difficult to collect under one roof - Azerbaijan and Armenia. But all these issues, in principle, are resolved, there would be a desire.
    PS, frankly speaking, there is no desire to integrate, even if they wanted to.
    1. 0
      19 February 2013 13: 09
      they already want it, yesterday there was an article about it!
    2. Kaa
      +2
      19 February 2013 13: 22
      Quote: Vladimirets
      honestly, there is no desire to integrate with the Balts, even if they wanted to.

      Yes, they will soon all go from there to the countries of the "old EU", just an empty territory may come in handy.
    3. +1
      20 February 2013 18: 41
      Capacitive and accurate.
  8. anchonsha
    +3
    19 February 2013 10: 32
    If it were just like that - the Eurasian Union appeared and suddenly appeared. The majority of the population of the CIS countries understand that they cannot survive without joining their union. And the problem is no longer in the different females (Madeleine, Rice, Clinton), who headed the main US department and the main hornet's nest against the USSR and Russia, but in the national oligarchic elites in individual CIS countries who do not want to lose the loot they had from the people. If you join an alliance, then you need to live there according to collective laws, that is, with the presence of democracy. But the majority of the people decide this, which means they will have to part with the stolen goods, live without corruption and within their means. What are the oligarchs of Moldova, Ukraine, Uzbekistan, etc. so afraid of now?
    1. +1
      19 February 2013 11: 06
      And what is the Eurasian Union? One of the options for the CIS? While maintaining the sovereignty of the members of the union, an amorphous organization will still turn out, where everyone who is in the forest is someone for firewood. This is shown by the practice of both the CIS and the European Union. And no president will agree to unite into a single state like in the USSR (this must be said goodbye to the authorities) and spit from the high bell tower on what the people want.
      1. Cat
        +2
        19 February 2013 12: 41
        By and large, the people (and even more so their desires) are a kind of political abstraction. Specific decisions are made by very specific people. Until they are convinced ("with a kind word and a gun") of the need for integration, nothing will happen. Are there forces in Russia or, for example, in Ukraine that can really "convince"? IMHO - no.
        1. 0
          20 February 2013 18: 47
          in Russia there are definitely, or it can be said, finalized after the accumulation of forces and means of the previous 12 years.
      2. 0
        19 February 2013 19: 34
        ore crumbles. but iron is smelted from it. the main thing is to step on the road and take the first step. and then go all the way.
  9. +3
    19 February 2013 10: 34
    Why do we need the USSR 2 or 3? We need that one and only Union. True, you can’t count on the Baltic states.
    1. +2
      19 February 2013 10: 46
      the Baltic states will sell ...
      1. +1
        19 February 2013 19: 36
        Quote: serjant4
        the Baltic states will sell ...
        will sell what? To the Baltic states ?? Well, buy it. we will find the money. only the former tenants then won. let them move to a new permanent residence.
        1. 0
          20 February 2013 22: 17
          Quote: wasjasibirjac
          Well, buy it. we will find the money.

          They’ve already bought it, Tsar Peter sent 2 million Efimkov to Karol Karl for her, and no one canceled the deal, so formally it is ours!
  10. +4
    19 February 2013 10: 45
    Everything will ultimately end with full integration. Only those who have their own interests in this state of affairs in the world do not want to talk about this.
    1. Cat
      +5
      19 February 2013 12: 50
      I absolutely agree, full integration is inevitable. All butting comes down to where the center of integration will be. I would very much like that in the territory of the former USSR - in Moscow, Kiev, Nizhny Tagil fellow - no difference
      1. +1
        19 February 2013 15: 59
        The main thing is not in Chernivtsi .... negative
  11. +3
    19 February 2013 11: 03
    Quote: predator.3
    According to the interlocutor of the publication, Puzikov and other alleged members of the scam in the military department, who also went abroad, will be charged in absentia.

    Hence the question: Who released it? and where did the FSB look?


    Yes, let them knock over with a whole gang and finally fall into death (to the failure of the liver) - all one she will no longer be needed, because You won’t have to eat juicy meat for a long time, and baland is a more useful product for tired liver ...
    And if the tracker doesn’t have to tap through the liver through the liver, then you’ll also see freedom ...

    There was one "acquaintance" prosecutor who ran and ran around abroad and from Poland "came" to the dock, and-and-and-and-and-and ... "a train was traveling along the tundra, along the railway:" Leningrad-Vorkuta ".... smoke, smoke, smoke ...
    1. 0
      19 February 2013 16: 12
      2 Tartary about the tundra
      To be precise, the cited song is just the opposite
      "Along the tundra, along the wide road, where the courier Vorkuta-Leningrad rushes"
      That is, the prosecutor is already trying to return, according to the plot of this song, he even runs back, having made an escape. But the volunteers are in place, and Putin does not yawn;)
      With this scenario, I agree - I got to places so remote, and there are already options
      1. 0
        20 February 2013 08: 55
        Quote: pechv
        With this scenario, I agree - I got to places so remote, and there are already options

        Let it be like a remix (option), however ...
  12. gordeew_alr
    0
    19 February 2013 11: 07
    All these economic-based persuasions are babble.
    It’s much easier to understand what to do and what forces we have for this, if you know that you and your brother in Greater Russia are in the same captivity, in the same hut of a concentration camp, with the same outcome - destruction, - which are planned and implemented by the enemy who has captivated you. And you also need to know that the union — the deeper the better — discards the shackles and drives away the enemy. Who, then, can keep them from rebuilding Greater Russia?
  13. +3
    19 February 2013 11: 29
    ... All the states listed above can quite independently figure out in which direction they should move further. The main thing is to step over your mania and phobias, assess the prospects for economic cooperation with each other .....
    If someone allows them to do this, I can imagine how these p.i.nd.o.s.k.s...k. rejoiced when TOTALLY UNPUNISHED they were allowed to manipulate the consciousness of people in the territory of the former USSR, to turn the most educated people on the planet into cattle and push among themselves, and themselves from the side to sit and rejoice. I hate these scum. am
  14. Fodaorugel
    +1
    19 February 2013 11: 57
    I wonder when Hilary said about USSR-2.0, did she still have diarrhea? Or maybe a banged head hurt? ..
    1. Kaa
      +2
      19 February 2013 13: 26
      Quote: Fodaorugel
      did she still have diarrhea? Or maybe a banged head hurt

      The place where the diarrhea came out was "sealed", that's all d ... mo in the head and shibanulo, hence the statements are buggy ...
      1. +1
        20 February 2013 00: 24
        An old sick woman ..... Maybe her ilenium was over at that moment, and now everything fell.
  15. +1
    19 February 2013 12: 04
    Economic results of the work of the Customs Union in 2012: mutual trade grew by 8,7%, foreign trade - by 3,2%

    http://www.sdelanounas.ru/blogs/29203/
  16. Cpa
    +2
    19 February 2013 12: 09
    If we take into account the intensity of nationalism in the post-Soviet space, you need to find a universal name for all citizens of Russia, at least. When the concept of a Soviet person existed, everyone could proudly call himself that, without feeling infringed. Now everyone is called Russians, the Russian people, here the dog is buried: on In most languages ​​of nationalities, the word "Russian" sounds like Urus, Orus, Ors, which in translation means Russian, but this is not so for these peoples. Therefore, each ethnic representative does not say that he is a Russian, but says: "I am a Bashkir, I am a Tatar, I am a Chuvash, I am a Dagestani, etc. "Notice in Dagestan 36 small nations speaking different languages. Thus, the name has a defining meaning for the future of Russia and all possible alliances!
    psDevil is in the details !!!
    1. +2
      19 February 2013 13: 20
      If we talk about the details, did you often hear in Soviet times that a representative of some republic proudly called himself a Soviet person (speaking on television and abroad does not count)?
      No one ever forgot about their nationality, but also did not forget that they are an integral part of the ONE BIG STATE. So it was until the central government was carried away by the games of liberalism, pluralism, etc. That's when pseudo-patriots for every nationality appeared, not without the help of Western intelligence agencies. So the main thing is not what the state is called, but how the central government works. The fish rots from the head.
      1. Cpa
        +1
        19 February 2013 13: 42
        To be honest, I can still hear them say: "Renat Mamedov, Soviet Union"!
        So these are not speculations, but facts. hi
        Prisoner of the Caucasus:
        "... What are you doing? We are Soviet people! .."
        1. Cpa
          0
          19 February 2013 13: 59
          1976AG,
          So the main thing is not what the state is called, but how the central government works. The fish rots from the head.
          This is undeniable, but the wise Soviet authorities took into account the name !!! fellow
          To the same topic of the article about integration in the post-Soviet space! drinks
        2. +1
          19 February 2013 14: 36
          I asked the movie not to be considered. And then, if a person says that he is a Bashkir or a Belarusian, a Ukrainian, does this mean that he distances himself from Russia or from Russians? You say the USSR ... Incidentally, the flags of 15 union republics were prominently displayed on the state emblem of the USSR. Did you forget about nationality then? And the flag of the Russian Federation occupied a central place. If you wish, you could see the exaltation of the Russian nation to the detriment of the rest and much more. But everyone felt like a single people. That was politics, a national idea, if you like. Then they brought it up. What now? Turn on the TV, there is either an advertisement for a beautiful life, for many which is too expensive, or crime in various forms. And only sometimes, something peaceful. And on the coat of arms we have a predator, moreover a mutant. When you see this every day, will you feel like a citizen of a great state? So all the same, it's not the name.
          1. Cpa
            0
            19 February 2013 14: 48
            I wrote that people united, you write that they will be eaten. Two sides of the same coin. Each sees in his own way, but if you were the leader of the country, would you really not have taken into account what I noticed? request
            For that purpose I’m writing, a person can make a decision in this area. And everyone can criticize the authorities. Do your suggestions on the integration of the CIS!
            1. +1
              19 February 2013 15: 50
              Without criticizing the authorities it is impossible to explain the situation in which we are. Regarding the CIS ... It depends on what is meant by integration. In terms of economics, integration processes are ongoing, but within those limits, as long as it is mutually beneficial (customs union and some other points). But here we need to understand one fundamental thing - no matter how much economic integration goes and no matter how far it goes, this does not mean that political integration will necessarily happen after that. It may or may not. And everyone can have their own reasons for unification. But still, the main reason, I think, is selfish. Russia can also be milked if you approach this wisely. If some kind of threat arises, Russia will already help (CSTO treaty). But at the same time, all presidents will remain presidents, i.e. their own masters. Kings at home. And now think for yourself with what joy they want to unite? I hope you do not think that presidents are fulfilling the will of the people? It is also useful to read the story and see what processes led to the unification of states (peoples). Therefore, I believe that today and in the near future, while maintaining today's policies, unification into a single state is impossible.
              1. Cpa
                0
                19 February 2013 19: 32
                There is an objective reason for political unification - a threat to territorial integrity and sovereignty, but I spoke above about our current country and internal contradictions. Do not underestimate national identity, disregard for it, in an equal share, as flirting with it leads to "Karabakhs, Chechnya and Abkhazia ".
          2. +1
            19 February 2013 16: 22
            Quote: 1976AG
            And on the coat of arms we have a predator, moreover a mutant. ... So the main thing is not what the state is called ....
            The main thing is what coat of arms. "Russian-speaking Russians, I am addressing you ..." - we will try to see our nationality in the passport. Who did it and why? In Soviet times, nationalities were not opposed to each other (and were not ignored), especially the concept of the Soviet people.
            Anecdote on the topic: "In fact, you can be rich and honest. But for this, you first need to become rich, and only then be honest."
            They screwed up at one time, grabbed the trough of excitement, now it smelled hot - everything is holier than the Pope became ... So, what's the main thing? The main thing is which state.
    2. +1
      19 February 2013 19: 40
      the writer Zlotnikov, whom I respect, has an interesting phrase - "Russian is an adjective that must be applied to all peoples living in Russia."
      1. Cpa
        +1
        19 February 2013 21: 26
        I would be glad to think the same way, Eugene, but the Russians need to raise their dignity to a level no lower than the Tatar, American, Chinese. There are too many rats divorced who call themselves Russians. .
      2. 0
        20 February 2013 18: 57
        Correctly. But even wider. There is such a concept as the Russian world, these are the peoples who live on the territory of the USSR, who have a single world outlook basis (except maybe the Baltic states), which is fundamentally different from the western one.
        1. Octavian avgust
          0
          20 February 2013 20: 55
          Well, do not talk about the Baltic states like that! Many have nothing wrong with the Russians, but the government is sticking its 5 cents. They themselves are glad to get rid of him, but not in strength yet. Peter the first knew the price for going to the Baltic states! soldier
  17. +1
    19 February 2013 12: 46
    <<< It is obvious that the new leadership of the US State Secretariat (an analogue of the Russian Foreign Ministry) will continue to do everything in the power of this department in order to prevent the close states in the CIS space from moving towards full-fledged integration, both in terms of their disposition and spirit.> >>
    Still would! So much effort and money was spent by the State Department to destroy the USSR, even the Nobel Committee was hooked up and given a prize to Humpbacked Perestroika - the initiator of the collapse process, and suddenly again Russia, which the West had already deleted from the number of sovereign states, instead of asking for alms and help, like the phoenix rises from the ashes and again seeks to organize the Union, Such a State Department and in a nightmare could not dream. Therefore, such a reaction. But the West seems to be worried early. The real process of integration in the CIS space is still very far away. Nationals who came to power in the republics, and now in independent states revel in their power and are unlikely to want to limit it to entering the new Union, unless "the roast cock bites." At the same time, the interests of their peoples, who are clearly predisposed to integration with Russia, do not seem to be of much concern to them. The main thing is NOT to LOSE power! Nevertheless, as PerestROEchnik said, the PROCESS (of integration) has gone and HIS SUCCESS to spite all the skeptics - "well-wishers"!



    --
  18. +1
    19 February 2013 15: 11
    I think the past eleven years of independence have clearly shown the CIS countries that without Russia and without a Russian education, which is why we all climbed out of the dense past, not a single republic will move one iota forward no matter how hard you try - America and Europe will never allow them to develop. How many plants and factories have been destroyed and sold for spare parts in the entire post-Soviet space of the CIS, God forbid, if 1% works, and even then they were left as a handout to think that they are independent. CIS integration is necessary as air, and here Russia needs to rigidly determine its positions and will not go anywhere, and the Russian language will become the state language, for Russia provides that very education.
    1. imperiologist
      +1
      19 February 2013 15: 57
      The sad thing is that this is not so and some republics do well without our language and education. In our LATER integration, we have strong competitors such as China and Turkey. All foreign policy with our after-friends should be carried out more actively, but soon that was part of the Russian Empire completely and irrevocably away from us
  19. figvamforever
    -1
    19 February 2013 16: 10
    Quote: w.ebdo.g
    slvevg, something you can not please in any way. Putin does not purge - bad. Conducts - all the same bad.


    Well, what are the cleanings. Who is sitting? Putin speaks beautifully, but where are the specific landings. Where is the report on the money that was returned to the treasury?
    And conversations of a public person without concrete actions are demagogy.

    And the forum is just for talking. If you do not like listening to others. I sympathize.
  20. +1
    19 February 2013 19: 08
    God created a woman to help a man. They imagined themselves and came up with emancipation. Clintonha is the product of the most vivid illustration of a stinking poop, who imagines herself more than a woman. The most correct thing would be to NOT notice her at all in any media.
  21. +3
    19 February 2013 21: 36
    Contrary to the frail covenants of Hillary,
    Grace decrepit over time,
    Amicably, moving the "fifth column"
    Along the way, let's go integration! laughing laughing laughing
  22. -1
    19 February 2013 22: 10
    Video topic:
    [media = [flash = 450,254, http: //static.video.yandex.ru/lite/bori55-klin/vwysnvky26.
    2233 /]]
  23. -1
    19 February 2013 22: 11
    Video in topic
    [media=<iframe%20width="450"%20height="254"%20frameborder
    = "0"% 20src = "http://video.yandex.ru/iframe/bori55-klin/vwysnvky26.
    2233 / "> ]
  24. Straiser
    0
    20 February 2013 09: 26
    Previously, the media covered corruption cases, where the amounts of millions of rubles sounded. Now less than a billion and can not be heard
  25. 0
    21 February 2013 00: 05
    Why wasn't I allowed to put an avatar at registration !!! ? This is so, not the topic) I agree with many that on many popular sites there are "sent Cossacks" who respond to any strong step of our leadership with criticism and incitement .. does the cyber war department work so well for them ?? ) In my opinion, after watching a video with "interrogation" in a normal person, a negative is formed not to Putin but to those who steal .. or am I wrong? but in general, half of the country steals and everyone needs to be planted! because of these in poverty, we are still poking around with our resources! it's called sabotage! and they used to shoot for this, but in the same us they are imprisoned for life
  26. 0
    21 February 2013 22: 34
    One thing can be said - Putin, as a leader, is not just SLAB, he is just ZERO. He himself lit up and created theft in his country at the very highest level and ... nothing ... not even surprised ...
  27. 0
    22 February 2013 19: 46
    I think so,
    are you kidding? far from weak .. that's all already piss, including and not only citizens of our state. I don’t know the reason that this is happening behind him, apparently the habit of Yeltsin was left to steal from everyone. I think you would be like that if you had the opportunity)))
  28. wow
    0
    23 February 2013 13: 48
    The author is great! Everything is sensibly "interpreted"! Reunification is inevitable; it is simply vital in this wobbling world. They do not "understand" it is only the so-called "national elites" are fed with food, the global goal of which is "to steal that vtekti".
  29. 0
    23 February 2013 14: 10
    What advice could this wife give to her husband when he was president of the United States of America (State)? What years did these presidencies fall in? With whom did the newly created states of the ex-USSR establish relations and on what conditions (proposed)?

    Was the lack of money (due to the "sudden" drop in oil prices) one of the main reasons for the collapse of the USSR? Fact: As of November 17, 2011, the total US national debt was $ 15 trillion 33 billion 607 million 225 thousand $ 920 32 cents[3] [4], as of January 1, 2012 - 15,3 trillion. dollars. The volume of debt exceeded 100% of US GDP[5]. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USD

    And if the Union had such opportunities for loans How could the situation develop hypothetically? And how do these United States differ from the participants in the "model interrogation" by Solovyov on RT (http://youtu.be/b-aTbzKevHU)? And then where is their vulnerability (and it is not necessary to fight, traditionally; with their own weapons, but in the same place; for many fragments)? And why not look inside the country for experts on these issues? And do Russia and friendly states have influential allies in the world on this issue (at least at the level - against whom are we friends)? What is needed in order to actually do this?

    Such nonsense ... laughing.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"