Ministry of Defense of the People's Republic of China: The Chinese Army is ready, together with the Russian Army, to defend justice in the world

The official representative of the Chinese Ministry of Defense, Wu Qian, said that the PLA is ready, together with the Russian Armed Forces, to defend justice in the world.

Wu Qian stressed that the Chinese armed forces are willing to work together with the Russian army to fully implement the important consensus reached by the heads of state of the two states, and together with their Russian counterparts, defend international justice and impartiality, and make every effort to ensure international and regional security.

Earlier, a representative of the Chinese Ministry of Defense explained the stated goals of holding PLA exercises around the island of Taiwan. Wu Qian stressed that the exercises are a necessary, reasonable and legitimate step aimed at combating Taipei's attempt to proclaim "Taiwan independence" by enlisting the support of external forces. The Ministry of Defense of the People's Republic of China recalled that the island of Taiwan is an integral part of China and the choice of ways to resolve the Taiwan issue is exclusively an internal matter for the population of the People's Republic of China. If necessary, the PLA is ready to defend the national sovereignty and territorial integrity of the country with practical actions.

In April of this year, a Ukrainian delegation visited Taiwan, trying to secure Taipei's support in matters of restoring the infrastructure of the territories remaining in Kyiv. In particular, the Ukrainian side first of all requested the supply of equipment for restoring the energy system. Today, the Kyiv regime's energy system has once again flown in missiles, since the power generation facilities in Ukraine are actively used for military purposes. One of the arrivals was via the Dnieper Hydroelectric Power Station, along the dam of which there has recently been an active transfer of forces and resources.

Comments

[Vladimir80]

The Chinese army is ready, together with the Russian army, to defend justice in the world

The usual statements for Eastern people and all politicians in general are respect in words, but personal interests in mind. In fact, “friendship” with China is a very conditional concept.

[krot]

It's time to create a military alliance...

In fact, “friendship” with China is a very conditional concept.

So we didn’t help them badly... It would take half a page to list everything...

[Vasyan1971]

“So we didn’t help them badly... It would take half a page to list everything...”©
What's the point? Many whom we helped “not badly”, if they don’t hate us for it, then take it for granted...

[krot]

And what's the point?

I hope China perceives and remembers help differently..
We are waiting for our Chinese brothers at the front!

[Vasyan1971]

I hope China perceives and remembers help differently..

"The hopes of young men are nourished" ©
Does everyone remember the story of O. Damansky?
I'm sure nothing has changed since then...

[krot]

For Domansky, we destroyed a lot of Chinese with MLRS, for what reason! One uninhabited island in the middle of the river is not worthy of mutual destruction! If you have a different opinion, your right!
Our leader acted very wisely, as did the Chinese leader.
Or do you want to fight for an uninhabited island on a river with China? Totally bad?

[Vasyan1971]

Or do you want to fight for an uninhabited island on a river with China?

It’s a matter of principle - first they surrendered the “deserted island” after everything that happened, then they gave away resources for next to nothing, and then, what? Whose is the phrase “A journey of 1000 li begins with one step”?

Totally bad?

Who? Just in case: “I’m like that myself!”

[Shurik70]

As long as Russian and Chinese interests coincide, China will be a reliable partner.
You just have to remember that a partnership involves two people. And think not only for yourself, but also do not forget about the interests of your partner.
That's the whole secret of friendship with China.
This won’t work with the Anglo-Saxons - they’ll betray you at the first opportunity.

[glestwid]

Why did you decide that China will quit as soon as it is beneficial for it? Does he have a different DNA chirality to behave radically different from the Anglo-Saxons?

[Shurik70]

Mutual assistance is a natural impulse of any person. Such impulses are neutralized by upbringing, which is why every nation has liars and businessmen. But still, in general, if the dividends from betrayal are small, most people will prefer to keep their old partner.
But the Anglo-Saxons have a really different DNA, perhaps.
Just as Israel gravitates towards senseless slaughter, so the Anglo-Saxons gravitate towards lies and betrayal, even if the dividends from this are small.
National peculiarity. Although, I think, it’s still not DNA, but upbringing. Race mentality.

[Sergej1972]

So the USSR was going to give Damansky to the PRC anyway, but after the appropriate legal procedure. And the Chinese went on a rampage, trying to aggravate the situation. Although they did not want a full-scale conflict. This conflict was largely of internal political significance for the Chinese amid the intensification of behind-the-scenes factional warfare surrounded by the aging and ill Mao. Even Mao could not completely eliminate factionalism and clanism within the CCP.

[Vasyan1971]

“They didn’t want a full-scale conflict.”©
Whoa. Like, “we wanted the best, but it turned out as always.” Where is the guarantee that this will not happen again?

[ziqzaq]

For Domansky, we destroyed a lot of Chinese with MLRS, for what reason!

Domansky was only an excuse; China actually then lay under the United States for the sake of the American market and technology. The Chinese drilled in the USSR and invaded Vietnam to prove to “Uncle Sam” that they fell under him.... And in Afghanistan they supplied the “spirits” with weapons with which they killed our guys... So China is not our ally at all, for now It is beneficial for him - a partner, and nothing more...

[Sergej1972]

Friendship with the United States began later, several years after the events at Damansky. At the end of the 60s, the Chinese themselves still accused us of opportunism and compromise in relations with the West.

[lynnot]

Does everyone remember the story of O. Damansky?

Just rewind to 1897, the Chinese also remember...

[Vasyan1971]

“Rewind back to 1897, the Chinese also remember...”©
Exactly. The Chinese remember how they grazed their sheep in the vicinity of Lake Baikal. And the trouble is not that they REMEMBER, but that, given the opportunity, they will definitely REMEMBER. Lions, bears, tigers and other roosters merged as soon as the Old Wise Monkey climbed down from the tree and TOOK A STONE AND A STICK IN HIS HANDS.

[lynnot]

The Chinese remember how they grazed their sheep in the vicinity of Lake Baikal.

Are you confusing us with the Buryats, Tungus and Mongols?

[Vasyan1971]

“Aren’t you confusing us with the Buryats, Tungus and Mongols?”©
All questions to Great Mao.
https://m.vk.com/wall-116973608_39306

[lynnot]

All questions to Great Mao.

This is what Mao said about a Chinese shepherd who was in captivity or slavery and tended other people’s sheep against his own will.

[Vasyan1971]

“This is what Mao said about a Chinese shepherd who was in captivity or slavery and tended other people’s sheep against his own will.”©
Exactly. But who cares about such subtleties? Oil, gas and other goodies were found in Siberia only under Brezhnev. And if under Mao, he would have come up with something more reliable. Have the Chinese authorities seen the art of the Far East and surrounding areas?
https://dzen.ru/a/XYY0zz2HNgCt_4nN

[lynnot]

By that time, “And apple trees will bloom on Mars.” Sarcasm, of course.

[Vasyan1971]

“By that time it will already be “And apple trees will bloom on Mars.”©
Anything is possible in this life!
The series was like this - "Border. Taiga novel." There was a story where two idiot officers had a duel. And the third big-faced one then yelled, like, “Soviet officers staged a duel! Will Russia and Ukraine fight next time?” It's absurd! Apple trees on Mars will bloom faster...

[lynnot]

The series was like this - "Border. Taiga novel."

This series was released in 2000, and the political course of the Ukrainian authorities that received “independence” in 1991, incl. "shadow" was quite obvious by that time...

[Vasyan1971]

“by that time it was quite obvious...”©
Yes? This is your afterthought. It doesn't count.
There was a story at the very beginning, when Niva was driving a rusty tamed tank across the field. Is this possible now? Why? Because NO ONE SERIOUSLY believed in what happened a little later.

[lynnot]

By the way, actor Guskov has a good interview where he recalls life in Kyiv and his neighbor... https://new-interview.ru/actors/aleksey-guskov-irina-shihman/

[Vasyan1971]

“By the way, actor Guskov has a good interview,”©
No longer interested. Neither Guskov nor his interview.

[lynnot]

No longer interested.

I understand that you are at least a troll

[Vasyan1971]

“I understand that you are, at the very least, a troll”©
"Ha ha" three times! If I don’t specifically dance to your tune, I’m not interested in Guskov and his neighbor, does that mean I’m immediately a “troll”? "Ha ha" five more times. I dare to remind you that it was you who started this tediousness, I was just politely supporting. Your clear arguments ended and I immediately became a “troll”...
Pokeda! I see no point in further communication...

[lynnot]

Marvelous! You expressed my opinion very accurately!

[Vasyan1971]

"Marvelous! You expressed my opinion very accurately!”©
Yes, I am like this. Therefore - leave! Go where you are going, on a good journey...

[lynnot]

By the way, the actor Guskov has a good interview where he recalls life in Kyiv and his neighbor...

[Sergey Novikov_3]

Which front are you talking about? They are not interested in European affairs. Here Russia itself will have to sort things out in splendid isolation (Belarus does not count)

[Oscar Mike]

Quote: krot

And what's the point?

I hope China perceives and remembers help differently..
We are waiting for our Chinese brothers at the front!

Well, Chinese drones from DJI have already been to the front, just not from the side you wanted. For the Chinese brothers, any non-Chinese is a laowai, who is a friend only if it benefits China.

[Bledar]

Many whom we helped “not badly”, if they don’t hate us for it, then take it for granted...

They do not take this for granted, but believe that instead of help from Moscow, it would be better if a free liberal democratic America came, and Moscow pursued its geopolitical interests with its help

[2 Level Advisor]

Quote: krot

So we didn’t help them badly... It would take half a page to list everything...

Can you list exactly how the Russian Federation helped them, and not the USSR? so Ukraine and Kazakhstan are parts of the USSR, which helped them... and in general, how much can you bring emotions into a look at politics? countries - not people - do what is beneficial to them, especially when the country that helped no longer exists... or when countries did not think in terms of their own benefit - are there examples?

[Poplar]

or once upon a time countries did not think in terms of their own benefit - are there examples?

There are examples, of course. For example: why did the Russian Empire fit into the First World War? I think that if they wanted, they could very well find an excuse not to fulfill some kind of agreement with who knows who.

[Vasyan1971]

“I think that if they wanted, they could easily find an excuse not to fulfill some agreement with who knows who.”©
That's exactly what one "thinks". On a comfortable sofa you think about a lot...

[smart fellow]

For example: why did the Russian Empire fit into the First World War?

The Englishwoman made a mess. RI was supposed to fight on the side of Germany. When the 2nd Pacific Squadron sailed to Port Arthur, German steamships supplied it with coal, and the British spoiled it with whatever they could. And it was possible to unite with Napoleon and divide the world, but it didn’t work out.

[Dryulea]

And it was possible to unite with Napoleon and divide the world, but it didn’t work out.
So that's why Paul I was killed! (Another Englishwoman awarded him)

[smart fellow]

If they had united with Napoleon, there would also have been an Indian Union Republic or region. In North America, the territory of the former Fort Ross in California and Alaska would be Russian lands. Maybe there would now be a war against the backward Americans. In French Louisiana and Mexico, locals would fight for independence from the mother country - France.

[Volunteer Marek]

We helped a lot of people. And, some people were simply saved. And, they also created a lot of people. And where are these “whom did they help, protect and create? From the camp of the enemy.

[rs777]

They helped and are helping everyone they could. Although Alexander III correctly said that Russia has only 3 allies. So all this help is sabotage, treason and senseless plundering of Russia.

[Good Evil]

Quote: krot

So we didn’t help them badly...

A service once provided is worth nothing! (C)

[hellcos]

respect in words, but personal interests in mind. In fact, “friendship” with China is a very conditional concept

Excuse me, but was it ever different in the history of mankind?

[Warrior-80]

No, this is new and good for us, I have never heard before that the Chinese army will defend our common interests, something happened, it looks like China has made up its mind

[dauria]

China has decided

Why should China decide? For him, everything is clear - to butt heads with the United States over the division of the planet. It was Russia who had to decide - to lie under the United States and become cannon fodder against China, or to become an ally-servant for China. Like Canada for the USA.
At least downvote it - this is the real balance of power for today.

[Chief Officer Lom]

There is a similarity, but very distant. Russia is much stronger than Canada. I would rather compare (in terms of power, not moral and political qualities) with the US-Britain tandem in 1945-50. And I think that if our elite has the will and intelligence, we will not be able to slide into the current situation of small Britain.

[lubesky]

The United States will not limit itself to just fighting for dominance; not a single empire has given up without a fight. China's self-confidence alone is not enough to fight the West. Russia is a valuable ally. I would rather believe in the division of the American inheritance between China and us than in China fighting alone.

[dauria]

Russia is a valuable ally.

Tell me how your allies are treated after a victory? Or do you remember the end of the Second World War?

[lubesky]

China has too little guts to deal with us somehow. We won't argue. Wait and see. I am very surprised how weak our compatriots consider us, although our history is more than 1000 years old and many times Russia was in an even worse situation, however...

[glestwid]

So what if it somehow existed for 1000 years? No empire lasts forever

[lubesky]

On the other hand, it is clear that apart from being an ally on the merits of my answer, you had nothing to answer

[dauria]

What is the answer here? You interpret the word “ally” as “friend”.
In fact, this is a slave who has nowhere to go. Should I remind you of Italy and Romania? It would be good for us to stay on the sidelines, but it is difficult to sit out. And the economy is not the same, and there are not many people. Either with the USA or with China.

[dmi.pris1]

Yes, okay! However, let them first try to fight for justice. Why not, shoulder to shoulder. Ah! Well, of course.. Fighters go ahead, and I’m behind you.. I’ll stand with my chest behind your backs (c)

[Bayun]

The almost complete analogy of “friendship” with the Reich in the 30s of the last century is straining.

FREEBIES have won again! Do the Chinese and Indians want cheap oil and gas? What pipes! Let the oil refineries and LNG terminals build them in Rus' with their own money and transport "oranges in barrels".

Even the MISTAKE of Soviet pipelines and the Nordic Streams did not teach anyone...

Gas from the Russian Federation must be supplied in “small containers”, and oil only in the form of gasoline, plastics and other products of DEEP(!) processing.

[zenion]

So the USSR, together with the USA, was engaged in the extermination of Nazi Germany when there were common interests. Then the USSR did not allow the United States to restore the USSR and the Amorkans were offended.

[UAZ 452]

Inflicting justice is a familiar matter.

[Fizorg]

Quote: Vladimir80

The Chinese army is ready, together with the Russian army, to defend justice in the world

The usual statements for Eastern people and all politicians in general are respect in words, but personal interests in mind. In fact, “friendship” with China is a very conditional concept.

We don’t know, but the Yankers are howling about this and the PRC is threatening...

[Ionescu Popa]

this declaration, made after the byzantine-God doomed state coup given in russia is either dellusional or, worse, the chinese, still lead by the shanghai xiongnu, are in it.

[Yves762]

Ndya?
What about Alibaba’s “departure” from Russia, or the actions of Chinese banks?
Does this fit into the same consensus reached by the heads...??..
Or in defense of international justice and impartiality...???...

[lubesky]

What about Alibaba’s “departure” from Russia, or the actions of Chinese banks?
Does this fit into the same consensus reached by the heads..??

Have you heard about secret interstate protocols and treaties? About the secrecy of agreements, strategy and tactics in order to mislead a potential enemy?

If you reveal ALL the cards, the costs for China will be colossal BEFORE thunder

[Yves762]

Quote: lubesky

Have you heard about secret interstate protocols and treaties?

No, have not heard. They're secret!

Although...... I'm lying.
I heard about one of these - “Secret Additional Protocol to the Non-Aggression Treaty between Germany and the USSR.”

Apparently, such things are “secret” also because they are very controversial, don’t you think?.

[Chief Officer Lom]

I think that our “entrepreneurs” are only happy and fought FOR leaving rather than AGAINST it. Remember how they lowered the cost of duty-free goods delivered mainly by Aliexpress.

[ycuce234-san]

Reducing consumer goods reduces the standard of living, which is undesirable.
It is precisely high-tech imported manufactured goods for business that need to be subject to duties - for example, laser systems, plasma torches, machine tools, robots, welding, industrial chemicals, and industrial electronics were sold there. In the struggle for industrialization, it is better to clamp down on other people’s industrial lasers and machine tools than on underpants.

[DmitriyG]

Is there any idea that you first need to create at least something high-tech of your own, and only after that ban someone else’s? Otherwise, you risk buying foreign good stuff for a zillion dollars without a chance to buy at least an average one, but your own for reasonable money...
“Own” means exactly our own, purely Russian developments and production, and not “Katyusha printers” and “Elbrus processors”, in which only the name is Russian...

[t7310]

I don’t know about the Katyusha, but the Elbrus are completely Russian, made where almost everyone makes their own factory with the necessary technical processes, few people have it, not everyone just can afford it, few people

[Yves762]

From my perspective, among these “entrepreneurs” there are many who resell to me the same goods from the same Ali, only with a lot of markup.
Well, why do we need speculators???

[2 Level Advisor]

Quote: Yves762

From my perspective, among these “entrepreneurs” there are many who resell to me the same goods from the same Ali, only with a lot of markup.
Well, why do we need speculators???

Well, you don’t need to buy from them and they will disappear. And if they buy it, it means someone is ready to pay them and someone needs them

[2 Level Advisor]

Quote: Yves762

And Alibaba’s “departure” from Russia

The Chinese trading platform AliExpress has denied information about the introduction of restrictions for Russian business. RBC writes about this on May 29 with reference to the press service of AliExpress CIS.

[Yves762]

That's why it was in quotes (try reading all the characters).
However, here’s more, to complete the picture -

Show / Hide text

https://www.forbes.ru/biznes/479259-the-bell-uznal-ob-otkaze-akcionerov-aliekspress-rossia-ot-finansirovania-kompanii

(I suppose this “Zh-zh-zh” is not without reason.)

[opposite28]

The Ministry of Defense of the People's Republic of China recalled that the island of Taiwan is an integral part of China and the choice of ways to resolve the Taiwan issue is exclusively an internal matter for the population of the People's Republic of China. If necessary, the PLA is ready to defend the national sovereignty and territorial integrity of the country with practical actions.

The determination of the PLA over the previous three years could not help but attract attention, as did AUKUS, under the pretext of tighter control of Australia by the United States. Just one story about an American-made nuclear submarine for the Australian Navy is worth something.

In April of this year, a Ukrainian delegation visited Taiwan, trying to enlist Taipei’s support in restoring the infrastructure of the territories remaining in Kyiv. In particular, the Ukrainian side first of all requested the supply of equipment to restore the energy system.

TSMC is not interested in Ukrainian investments. In addition, TSMC is moving its production to the USA while the PLA is shifting from foot to foot and conducting some exercises.

[Old Horseradish]

Oligarchic entities have been screaming about “dear Western partners” for 35 years. They degreased the entire country, transferred trillions of dollars to the West and..... The result is already obvious to the stupidest. Now new mantras about the “dear eastern partner” have begun. Everything is the same and the same.

[Soul of Russia87]

They cannot sell spare parts for their sold Chinese troughs directly without bank pads because they piss off the wrath of the sanctioned American owners. For this reason, the army will stand in line with us...nuyu nude

[ergh081]

Here. This is precisely the condition under which we can defeat the enemy on the European continent. We don't even need the PLA forces, we need their factories and resources to produce shells, missiles and aircraft. Anti-aircraft, ballistic, hypersonic missiles, in short our nomenclature. To carry hundreds of missiles, you need airplanes. All these products must be produced like sausages in the literal sense of the expression. The Chinese will be able to do this quickly, but we are unlikely to. I think that their satellite grouping for guiding missiles to targets would be of great help. This is precisely the condition under which it is possible not to use nuclear weapons against the enemy in Europe for now. This is what the President should negotiate with his friend Xi, and even present him with this proposal in the form of an ultimatum. Either you help us in this way, or there will be nothing left of your European trade partners. We have no choice. Well, if the US gets involved in the matter over Taiwan, we will help you with a strategic nuclear Sarmat

[Normann]

You can come to an agreement with them, but there is one nuance: they will always think about how to quickly chop off part of the territory for themselves.

[ergh081]

So, it is impossible to come to an agreement with the West, and this is confirmed by the entire history of Russia over the centuries. “Drang nach Osten” is in their blood, and we have no idea of ​​​​destroying Europe as such, we smashed the enemy when repelling an attack and reached the capitals of certain aggressor states (Sweden, France, Germany, etc.). And we never fought with China, there was a border incident (grandfather Mao tested the Union’s strength), but they were never seriously interested in these northern territories, hundreds of thousands of Chinese even built the Great Wall, fencing off their northern neighbors.

[glestwid]

Yeah, and that’s why in China there is a museum of conflicts with the Russian Federation, where Russians are not allowed under the guise of eternal repairs...

[bath]

Quote: Yves762

What about Alibaba’s “departure” from Russia, or the actions of Chinese banks?

Why do you believe this obvious rumor?

Is the huge, ever-growing, astronomical volume of trade between China and Russia, if not through transactions between Chinese and Russian banks, something you trade live on the weekends with a truck full of rubles?

[Ezekiel 25-17]

In Korea we stood shoulder to shoulder with them against the Yankees.

[2 Level Advisor]

Quote: Ezekiel 25-17

In Korea we stood shoulder to shoulder with them against the Yankees.

not against the Yankees, but against the UN... and not the Russian Federation, but the USSR (now 15 different states)..

[dauria]

In Korea we stood shoulder to shoulder with them against the Yankees.

The discord began with Korea. 150 thousand dead and 380 thousand wounded Chinese against three hundred people!!! in the USSR. The war was pulled out by Chinese soldiers and commanders. They took Seoul, outplayed the "brilliant" MacArthur, giving both the Americans and the British, and at the same time the Turks with all the UN members, a beating. China paid the Union's expenses!!! And did not get a damn thing as a result. That's the kind of "alliance" it is.

[Kronos]

The Chinese received nuclear weapons and various technologies from the USSR; is this not enough or what should they have been given?

[nordscout]

A very strange title for a "Chinese" article, given the "Chinese ornateness in words and thoughts" since the Tang Dynasty... These statements, from the lips of the official representative of the Chinese Ministry of Defense Wu Qian, seem to set the true state of affairs in Russian-Chinese relations in a "majeure mood"... One gets the impression that Russia has entered into a close military alliance with the Celestial Empire... Which is very inconsistent with the Chinese worldview and the inner world of any ethnic Chinese... For them, everything and everyone behind the Great Wall of China is an alien world, not deserving of respect, understanding, sympathy... The most understandable and accepted "message" from behind the "wall" is trade (not at a loss), situational partnership and the opportunity to use the money, knowledge, strength and power of the 陌生人 ("stranger") for one's own benefit... And the warriors, they are so-so... by Russians, Ukrainians - and not even close... And it is unlikely that in the "depths" of the General Staff of the RF Armed Forces a plan has matured to "bridle" the Taiwanese army, similar to the operation in Manchuria against the Kwantung Army in 1945... Although...

[Illanatol]

Quote: Vasyan1971

Does everyone remember the story of O. Damansky?
I'm sure nothing has changed since then...

But I am sure of the opposite. And what?
China is objectively interested in the Russian Federation remaining a sovereign and independent (especially from the West) state.
If the Russian Federation suffers a strategic defeat and becomes pro-Western, the PRC will go to hell. The People's Republic of China understands this very well. So we stand on a solid platform of mutual interests. No military alliance is required. We will be together, at least until the complete triumph of “multipolarity.” Next, let's see...

[Illanatol]

Quote: dauria

The discord began with Korea. 150 thousand dead and 380 thousand wounded Chinese against three hundred people!!! in USSR . It was the Chinese soldiers and commanders who pulled out the war. It was they who took Seoul, outmaneuvered the “brilliant” McCarthur, bringing down both the Americans and the British, and at the same time the Turks and all the UN members. China paid the Union's expenses!!! And I didn’t get a damn thing as a result. This is what “alliance” is like.

Nonsense. The discord began with the 20th Congress of the CPSU.
China got a lot. Not only military-technical assistance and technology from the USSR.
If all of Korea became pro-American, enormous damage would be caused to China's national security.
So Chinese soldiers in Korea also ensured the security of their country on the distant approaches.

[Sergej1972]

Mao officially approved the decisions of the 1956th Congress in 20. stated that Stalin was 70% right and 30% wrong. discord began in the late 50s and especially after the 22nd Congress of the CPSU in 1961. For some reason, we forget that at the 22nd Party Congress, criticism of Stalin and his policies was many times more powerful compared to the 20th Congress. The decisions of the 20th Congress were quite balanced and moderate in nature. By the way, it is interesting that in 1963-1964, shortly before his removal, Khrushchev, in many public speeches, quite often began to mention Stalin’s merits, and not just his mistakes. You may not agree with me, but in practice Khrushchev, paradoxically, was a much greater Stalinist compared to Brezhnev, Kosygin, and Suslov.

[Illanatol]

Quote: Level 2 Advisor

not against the Yankees, but against the UN... and not the Russian Federation, but the USSR (now 15 different states)..

Not fundamentally.
Mostly these were American troops, the rest were “back-up dancers”.
The Russian Federation is the assignee of the USSR.

[Cicerist98]

"Chinese Defense Minister speaker Wu Qian said that the PLA is ready, together with the Russian Armed Forces, to defend justice in the world."

Instead of these beautiful but essentially meaningless words, how about stopping the sale of drones and drone components to Ukraine and other US-allied or anti-Russia nations, as an elementary first step? THAT'S how you demonstrate in deed, and not just with your mouth, your readiness to defend something "together with the Russian Armed Forces".

[ximkim]

Earlier, a representative of the Chinese Ministry of Defense explained the stated goals of holding PLA exercises around the island of Taiwan. Wu Qian stressed that the exercises are a necessary, reasonable and legitimate step aimed at combating Taipei's attempt to proclaim "Taiwan independence" by enlisting the support of external forces. The Ministry of Defense of the People's Republic of China recalled that the island of Taiwan is an integral part of China and the choice of ways to resolve the Taiwan issue is exclusively an internal matter for the population of the People's Republic of China. If necessary, the PLA is ready to defend the national sovereignty and territorial integrity of the country with practical actions.

Now decide, decide your own first.

[Frank Muller]

“A Russian and a Chinese are brothers forever!”
Every person has heard that song.
How old was that “eternal” friendship?
But it didn’t become endless...

[Fakapych]

The ideal moment would be a month or a couple of weeks before the US elections. A sudden landing on Taiwan, Biden will be in a stupor - what to do or wait for a new term or fight.

[lynnot]

Apparently, this is a direct response to US statements about Chinese assistance to Russia.

[Illanatol]

Quote: Sergej1972

Mao officially approved the decisions of the 1956th Congress in 20. stated that Stalin was 70% right and 30% wrong. discord began in the late 50s and especially after the 22nd Congress of the CPSU in 1961. For some reason, we forget that at the 22nd Party Congress, criticism of Stalin and his policies was many times more powerful compared to the 20th Congress. The decisions of the 20th Congress were quite balanced and moderate in nature. By the way, it is interesting that in 1963-1964, shortly before his removal, Khrushchev, in many public speeches, quite often began to mention Stalin’s merits, and not just his mistakes. You may not agree with me, but in practice Khrushchev, paradoxically, was a much greater Stalinist compared to Brezhnev, Kosygin, and Suslov.

It's official... public statements from politicians don't cost much. And it was not about “Stalin’s mistakes,” but about accusing him of abuses of power, of “eastern despotism.”
I would not judge the degree of criticism at the 20th Congress, given that Khrushchev’s report was not in the public domain for a long time. Certainly not because he was “balanced and moderate.”
Public statements mean little. Khrushchev did a lot for the revisionism of Stalin's legacy, primarily in the economy and in military development. His “experiments” cost the country dearly.
Kosygin also caused a lot of harm to the economy, and it’s not for nothing that liberals respect him.
Of all the above-mentioned persons, the greatest Stalinist (and realist) was Brezhnev. Thanks to him, the “Perestroika project” started much later, when the USSR achieved parity in strategic nuclear forces, thanks to which the collapse of the USSR took place with relatively little bloodshed. Otherwise, a final solution to the “Russian question” by military means on the part of the West would not be ruled out.

[NOT malicious]

Well, yes. Kaneshna. Chinese friends.
And if you look at the map of China, look at the wiki for the latest entries on the population, bad things appear.