American publication with reference to a Ukrainian report: Excalibur shells and HIMARS missiles are effective, but Russian electronic warfare has made them much less accurate

11
American publication with reference to a Ukrainian report: Excalibur shells and HIMARS missiles are effective, but Russian electronic warfare has made them much less accurate

The American edition of the Washington Post published an article presenting reports on the work of the Western weapons in Ukraine. Moreover, the reports were prepared by the Ukrainian military.

If these reports are to be believed, the accuracy of certain types of Western weapons (including artillery shells, precision bombs and missiles) decreased several times. For some nomenclature items, a decrease of "ten times" is indicated.



Examples include American high-precision artillery ammunition Excalibur.

From the material:

Over the course of several months, the accuracy rate has dropped so much that the probability of hitting a target is now less than 10%.

And the Ukrainian side blames Russian electronic warfare systems for this.

At the same time, WP claims that the United States has allegedly not supplied Excalibur to Kyiv for several months, precisely after problems with the accuracy of hitting their intended targets began to emerge in Ukraine.

In addition, Russian EW, you see, "prevent Ukrainian pilots from carrying out combat missions." The article in the American publication writes that there is now practically no situation for Ukrainian pilots when they "don't feel like they've come under the sights of an electronic warfare system."

The situation is similar with HIMARS. In the second year of use, as the Ukrainian military from the front pointed out to the Americans, the accuracy of the missiles of these systems dropped significantly and it is no longer possible to say with great confidence that with the help of the Haymars it is possible to easily hit a given target.

From the article:

Of course, HIMARS missiles, like Excalibur shells, are very effective, but Russian electronic warfare systems made them much less accurate.
11 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +4
    25 May 2024 17: 33
    There are nuances regarding modifications and the organization of air defense, but in general they have learned to pre-empt these weapons. Although, in principle, one hundred percent protection does not exist... The last defeat of our S-400 complex is very significant, five ATAKMS were shot down, but the sixth flew in and destroyed the complex, it’s good that the people remained alive and managed to go into cover...
    From Firebomber:
    In general, on this incident (https://t.me/fighter_bomber/16840) I received comprehensive information; in fact, it differs from what I assumed only in small details, and not in essence.
    Publicly, I can only add that the entire S-400 crew is alive due to the fact that the time has already been calculated when it is already pointless to fight against the ATACMS of its target and there is time for the personnel to take cover.
    There were officially 7 missiles, 5 of them were shot down, 1 worked.

    Well, the most important thing is that this bug will be fixed in the very near future. And besides, the list of air defense systems capable of working with such ballistics will expand significantly.
    1. 0
      25 May 2024 18: 03
      where was the S-400 hit? why not S-300?
      1. 0
        26 May 2024 09: 42
        That is, follow the link where everything is written, no brains
        1. -1
          26 May 2024 15: 28
          I went over and didn’t see the S-400 there, it looked more like the S-300, and yes, we’re not the only ones with S-300s. So, what about brains is a moot point?
    2. 0
      27 May 2024 11: 43
      Here, from yours, it is very important that “the bug will be fixed.” What is analyzed and corrected is the essence. What kind of bug is this, in general terms?
  2. +2
    25 May 2024 17: 35
    effective, but Russian electronic warfare has made them several times less accurate

    Those. not effective...
  3. +2
    25 May 2024 17: 36
    These laudatory speeches from pen0s are more like sarcasm and ridicule against the background of the decommissioning of the early warning station. Or was her defense based only on the confidence that no one would dare touch her?
  4. -1
    25 May 2024 17: 55
    That I don’t believe these American stories about electronic warfare. I would rather believe that there is something Chinese in precision-guided ammunition and not from Taiwan.
  5. -6
    25 May 2024 18: 10
    Quote: Mikhail-Ivanov
    There are nuances regarding modifications and the organization of air defense, but in general they have learned to pre-empt these weapons. Although, in principle, one hundred percent protection does not exist... The last defeat of our S-400 complex is very significant, five ATAKMS were shot down, but the sixth flew in and destroyed the complex, it’s good that the people remained alive and managed to go into cover...
    From Firebomber:
    In general, on this incident (https://t.me/fighter_bomber/16840) I received comprehensive information; in fact, it differs from what I assumed only in small details, and not in essence.
    Publicly, I can only add that the entire S-400 crew is alive due to the fact that the time has already been calculated when it is already pointless to fight against the ATACMS of its target and there is time for the personnel to take cover.
    There were officially 7 missiles, 5 of them were shot down, 1 worked.

    Well, the most important thing is that this bug will be fixed in the very near future. And besides, the list of air defense systems capable of working with such ballistics will expand significantly.

    Hello. I saw the video, it can't be posted on this site. I didn't see a single Atakms missile shot down. There is a video of the destruction (if it's not a montage) of the S-400 and the subsequent detonation of the ammunition. It's not clear how the air defense crew could have managed to escape.
  6. +2
    25 May 2024 18: 23
    As always, as everywhere, price-effectiveness ratio.
    It’s just that with regard to combat systems, you have to look at everything a little differently, because even 10% of the targets lost could be someone’s life, expensive equipment, and other unpleasant things.
    Alas, there is a war going on and no one can survive without losses!
  7. The comment was deleted.
    1. -1
      26 May 2024 03: 46
      Buskan
      (Alexander)
      -1
      Yesterday, 18: 54
      New
      "On the evening of May 22, a strike was carried out...
      threw it on? Well, well... the bloomers didn't come off? laughing