Progress of North Korea's missile weapons

13
Progress of North Korea's missile weapons
The Hwasong-18 missile system undergoing testing, April 2023.


The DPRK's defense strategy is based on the idea of ​​a massive retaliatory nuclear missile strike. To implement this concept, the country is developing, adopting and mass-producing strategic missile systems of various classes. To date, the defense industry of the DPRK has reached a very high level, and similar developments in their parameters and capabilities are close to products from the world leaders in the missile industry.



Ballistic potential


The key element of the North Korean strategic missile system is ballistic missile systems. Operational-tactical, short- and medium-range systems have been created and are in service. In addition, the last decade has seen significant progress in the class of ground-launched intercontinental missiles.

According to known data, the first North Korean ballistic missile with a flight range of at least 5500 km was tested in the mid-XNUMXs, but then it was only an experiment. By the tenth year, the DPRK industry had accumulated the necessary experience and began to create full-fledged ICBMs suitable for adoption and operation by the troops.


Hwaseong-18 rocket launch

Over the past decade, several Hwasong series complexes with high flight characteristics and combat load have been created, tested and presented. Thus, the flight range was gradually increased from 5,5-6 thousand km to 8-10 thousand km. Due to this, the DPRK for the first time had the opportunity to target its ICBMs at targets located on the continental United States.

The most advanced Korean ICBM at the moment is the Hwasong-18, first introduced last year. Three test launches took place in April, July and December, demonstrating the potential of this missile and the system as a whole. According to known data, the Hwasong-18 is now in serial production and is entering service troops.

Like other North Korean missile systems, the Hwasong-18 is mobile and built on a multi-axle special chassis. Such a vehicle carries a lifting transport and launch container with a missile having a length of approx. 25 m and a mass of about 55-60 tons. The rocket is three-stage and has solid fuel engines. The flight range, according to foreign estimates, can reach 13-15 thousand km. The missile can carry a conventional and nuclear warhead.

Underwater component


The DPRK is striving to build a full-fledged nuclear triad, and for this purpose is developing the direction of submarine-launched ballistic missiles. The first missile of this class, called Pukkyuksong-1, was developed in the first half of the 2014s and first tested in 2016. Then at least a dozen new test and training launches took place, after which in 17-1,2. the product was accepted for service. According to foreign estimates, the first North Korean SLBM belonged to the class of short- or medium-range missiles and could fly 2-XNUMX thousand km.


Launch of the Pukkyuksong-3 rocket, October 2019

The field of SLBMs has developed, and already in 2017, the Pukkyukson-3 missile was shown for the first time at one of the parades. For unknown reasons, flight tests of this product began much later, only in 2019. During the test launch, the rocket followed a trajectory corresponding to a flight at a range of up to 2,5 thousand km. It is assumed that Pukkyukson-3 entered service at the turn of the decade and is now used on combat duty.

In 2020, again at a military parade, a missile with the designation “Pukkyukson-4” was demonstrated. Just a few months later, the next product of the family with the number “5” was shown. In 2022, a similar premiere of the Pukkyukson-6 SLBM took place. All of these missiles are significantly different from their predecessors and should probably show better performance. However, tests of the three products have not yet been carried out, and even their approximate parameters remain unknown.

Hypersonic direction


To increase the combat potential of the missile forces, fundamentally new technologies are being studied and mastered. Thus, several years ago it became known that the DPRK was working on the creation of missile systems with hypersonic gliding warheads. Such products or their models were even demonstrated at exhibitions and parades.

On April 2, 2024, tests of a similar development, the Hwasongpo-16na complex, took place. The launch of a rocket with advanced combat equipment took place at one of the test sites near Pyongyang; the end point of the trajectory was in the Sea of ​​Japan. In order to ensure the safety of the tests and conceal the real characteristics of the complex, the flight was carried out with restrictions on the flight range.


Pukkyuksong-5 missiles on parade, January 2021

As reported, the hypersonic warhead successfully flew to the target area. In flight, he maintained a given speed and performed maneuvers in altitude and heading. The maximum altitude of the trajectory exceeded 100 km. The flight ended with the fall of the warhead at a given point in the Sea of ​​Japan.

The real parameters and combat qualities of the Hwasongpo-16na complex remain unknown. DPRK official sources indicate that it has a “medium-long range,” but do not provide exact numbers. Also, other design features are not disclosed. Apparently, the new hypersonic complex can send its warhead to a distance of at least 2-3 thousand km and attack point targets. A direct hit from such an object can cause serious damage to the target, and it is possible to install a warhead, incl. nuclear.

Strategic winged


Recently, the DPRK's arsenals have included ground-based cruise missiles designed to solve strategic-level combat missions. The first complex of this class, called Khvasar-2, was developed at the turn of the decade, and in January 2022 the first test launch of the new rocket took place. Then they carried out several more tests, after which the missile was presumably put into service.


Hypersonic missile system "Hwasongpo-16na", April 2024

"Khwasar-2" is a cruise missile of a traditional layout, built in a cylindrical body approx. 6 m and diameter approx. 600 mm. The product has a straight wing that expands in flight. The launch is carried out from a ground launcher using a solid propellant engine. The main engine is a turbojet. It is assumed that the missile can be equipped with a special warhead.

Like other products of its class, the Khvasar-2 missile is subsonic. It is capable of long-distance flight. Thus, during tests in the recent past, missiles flew along closed trajectories and showed a range of 2 thousand km. Perhaps there were restrictions again, and the real characteristics of the rocket are much higher.

Defense issues


For obvious reasons, the DPRK pays a lot of attention to the development of strategic missile systems. Various samples of all main classes, including the newest ones, are being developed and brought into service by the troops. New developments are regularly demonstrated, and test and training launches are reported.

The gradual and systematic development of missile technology and weapons has led the DPRK to very interesting results. The country's missile forces have a number of land-based missile systems of different classes, including intercontinental ones. Moreover, the highest range characteristics have been achieved, making it possible to solve the most complex combat missions. With all this, other classes of missiles continue to develop, incl. non-strategic - from operational-tactical to medium-range systems.


Launch of the Khvasar-2 cruise missile, February 2023.

The land component of the strategic missile group has recently been replenished with fundamentally new models. Tests of a ground-launched cruise missile have been conducted and probably completed. A mobile complex with a medium-range missile carrying a hypersonic warhead is also being tested.

Construction of the underwater component of the strategic forces has begun. To date, it has received medium-range SLBMs. At the same time, the level of development of North Korean missile technology allows us to expect that in the foreseeable future ICBMs will also be deployed on submarines. These will probably be missiles with a minimum range for their class, but this will also change the capabilities fleet.

In parallel with missiles, their possible combat equipment is being developed. The DPRK has a full-fledged nuclear program and produces special warheads of a number of types with different characteristics. All or almost all of them are compatible with the latest model missile systems. The deployment of such warheads on modern missiles will in a certain way increase the combat effectiveness of missile forces and have a positive effect on deterrence processes.

Thus, despite limited resources and capabilities, the DPRK pays great attention to issues of strategic deterrence and creates appropriate weapons and means. With their help, it is possible to send a signal to potential opponents and maintain an acceptable situation in the region. It is obvious that the DPRK's missile weapons will continue to develop, and promising models will help maintain peace.
13 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. 0
    23 May 2024 05: 09
    Real Koreans, of course, are great, but what is a triad without missile-carrying bombers?
    There are no questions about retaliation as the basis of nuclear strategy. The small territory and the absence of an early detection system eliminate such questions.
    1. -1
      23 May 2024 10: 12
      North Korea is a buffer zone for China. therefore, Big Brother transmits all the necessary information in real time.
      1. +1
        23 May 2024 10: 27
        Quote: Height76
        Elder Brother transmits all the necessary information in real time.

        I strongly doubt that it transmits everything instantly... If at all.

        Quote: Height76
        North Korea is a buffer zone for China
        Compare the sizes of the DPRK and China, estimate the main directions threatened by China before writing such things...
  2. 0
    23 May 2024 07: 11
    I just want to ask them: Wow, guys, where does this power come from? And they are like this: feel request
    1. -1
      23 May 2024 10: 10
      The answer is simple - China is a neighbor
      1. +1
        23 May 2024 14: 53
        China is a neighbor to many people and if it gives the DPRK any money, it is not much. Koreans are simply purposeful and do not stop there.
  3. -2
    23 May 2024 13: 00
    The DPRK, as a local state with a small territory, faces the difficulty of implementing a “nuclear deterrence” strategy. No matter how many and what kind of missiles they have.
    First of all, the problem is the size of the DPRK itself. Concealing any kind of preparation in such a small area (where the difficult terrain is both an advantage and a disadvantage) is an unrealistic task.
    Considering the specifics of the economic situation of the DPRK and its economy, the PGRK there will also be a very dubious decision because these are massive, noticeable targets that inevitably contrast strongly against the backdrop of typical Korean landscapes and have difficulties with covert deployment in a threatening period. Monitoring the movements of these RKs, taking into account the size of the territory, is not an objectively difficult task. Hiding them under civilian equipment will also not work, due to the modest (by the standards of a neighboring country) fleet.
    If in our case the PGRK is a good model, then in their case this decision is questionable. Preparing numerous false silo positions with tunnels, taking into account their relief, looks preferable.

    Regarding the underwater component, this is also a dubious decision, although I understand that this decision is forced and justified. Considering the geography of the DPRK, the withdrawal of SSBN-like structures will be fraught with significant difficulties, and the Americans will not have difficulty monitoring the state of their operational readiness and proposed exit routes. The region is saturated with fleets, the ASW there will be strong and the missile-armed submarines of North Korea have little chance of successful deployment.

    The flight paths of ballistic missiles “to America” from the DPRK, due to the specifics of its size and geography, are quite predictable - given their numbers, this can only have some effect if the DPRK decides to launch a preemptive strike. In the event of an attack being prepared by the United States + allies, the DPRK’s potential “against America” will tend to zero. The removal of any regional bases or even damage to US allies in the region is what the Americans would call a “small price.” Moreover, there would be problems with the removal of Japan itself - missiles can be intercepted over the sea by a naval missile defense component with the assistance of ground-based missile defense of Japan itself. They are preparing for such a development of the situation by monitoring North Korean launches.
    I believe that if something happened, only South Korea and the DPRK itself could really suffer.
    It should also be noted that the real intelligence capabilities of the DPRK itself as a local mononational. states are significantly limited. If the preparation of the North Koreans themselves for a strike or their activity can be effectively monitored by space means. and radio reconnaissance as well as UAVs from adjacent territories, then the DPRK itself has little such capabilities and the likelihood of them “clicking through” preparations for an attack on itself is significant.

    I’ll summarize - with the exception of silos, the other components of the DPRK do not convince me, given the size of the territory and the presence of the United States in neighboring countries, an effective BGU operation against North Korea seems quite possible to me. In the case of competent planning, most of the DPRK's nuclear potential will be a problem only for the DPRK itself, while a smaller part will be a problem for South Korea. For the United States, all this can be a problem only in the event of a first strike, which is excluded.
    1. +3
      23 May 2024 14: 57
      In your opinion, North Korea is the size of the Vatican, everything is visible from everywhere, satellites hang over it and broadcast online. North Korea is actually larger than Bulgaria and Portugal
      1. -1
        23 May 2024 16: 52
        Everything is relative. Comparing the DPRK and, for example, the PRC or us, we can definitely say that the Americans will have orders of magnitude fewer problems detecting their PGRK. Moreover, they understand both our and Chinese elites much better, and they also pressed much less.
        It is easier to detect a large moving target in the DPRK because there are not many large and moving targets there, and the road network is much more modest. It is not so difficult to monitor this territory from satellites - the tracking route passes over the northern regions of the PRC and (possibly) over the northern regions of Iran. So the organization of monitoring the DPRK 24/7 fits perfectly into monitoring the state of the “axis of evil” and can be invested in one budget for the Americans.
        1. +4
          23 May 2024 19: 52
          The DPRK is a mountainous country; you can hide a lot of things there under trees and rocks. It’s quite difficult to monitor all this 24/7, since there are not so many satellites
  4. +2
    24 May 2024 13: 15
    With another five million shells for the Russian Defense Ministry, Korea’s progress will be visible in reality
  5. -1
    11 June 2024 15: 38
    When there are two big brothers nearby, then why not develop?
  6. -1
    18 August 2024 23: 49
    The most advanced Korean ICBM at the moment is the Hwasong-18 product,


    Hwasong-18 is very similar to our Topol, why would that be....