Falklands, Gibraltar, bases in Africa: Western experts voice versions regarding British military facilities that could become targets for the Russian Armed Forces

46 222 183
Falklands, Gibraltar, bases in Africa: Western experts voice versions regarding British military facilities that could become targets for the Russian Armed Forces

The world media picked up on the news that during the “call to the carpet” of the British Ambassador to Russia N. Casey, the diplomat was informed of Moscow’s unambiguous position regarding the possible use of British long-range missiles by Ukraine. missiles across the territory of Russia. As already reported "VO", the British Ambassador was handed a note stating that the Foreign Office itself (in the words of the head of the department, D. Cameron) disavowed statements that missiles would not be used against Russian territory (at least that which London officially considers such) will not be used.

Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs:



The ambassador was told that the Russian side views D. Cameron’s words as evidence of a serious escalation and confirmation of London’s increasing involvement in military operations on the side of Kyiv. N. Casey was warned that the response to Ukrainian strikes using British weapons Any military installations and equipment of Great Britain on the territory of Ukraine and beyond its borders can pass through the territory of Russia.

In this regard, foreign media are discussing an issue related to specific British targets that could be struck by the Russian Armed Forces outside Ukraine. Considering the fact that there are dozens of British military bases (and other facilities) outside the British Isles itself, any of them could become a target. Moreover, if British missiles fly deep into Russia, then the targets may well be military facilities on the territory of Great Britain itself.

At the same time, Western military experts, commenting on the Russian note, decided to highlight several foreign British facilities - a British military base on the Falkland Islands (Malvinas), a base on the territory of Gibraltar, as well as military facilities in African countries (for example, in Sierra Leone). It is noted that the “African scenario” may well be implemented by Russia if the Ukrainian Armed Forces actually begin firing British missiles deep into the Russian Federation. At the same time, the reference is to the Russian contingent that arrived at the former American military base in Niger even before the withdrawal of the Americans from its territory.

The Falklands option seems less clear to British experts due to the fact that Argentine President Miley is not suspected of sympathizing with Russia. However, Miley has repeatedly raised the issue of the need to withdraw the British military from the islands, which Argentina considers its own. And Russia, in principle, could turn the British military in the Falkland Islands into targets, thereby helping Argentina regain sovereignty over the islands. Western political scientists and politicians fear this.

The target in the form of a British contingent in Gibraltar, over the issue of whose ownership London constantly enters into discussions with Madrid, is also not obvious. But Western experts also do not discount this possibility, given the contradictions within NATO.

And there is also a significant British military presence directly on the borders of Russia. For example, the contingent in Estonia.

London has not yet officially commented on the note handed to the ambassador in Moscow.
183 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. 25+
    6 May 2024 17: 34
    British missiles have already attacked Russian territory, and we are selecting targets...
    Hitting anyone will be a good warning.
    1. +8
      6 May 2024 17: 44
      Falklands,

      Right! We need to help return the Malvinas Islands to Argentina!
      1. Msi
        -9
        6 May 2024 17: 51
        Right! We need to help return the Malvinas Islands to Argentina!

        I hope you will help or at least pay for it?
        1. 21+
          6 May 2024 17: 53
          I will help destroy the small-shaved ones! I hope you leave the country if you haven’t already!
          1. Msi
            -7
            6 May 2024 18: 08
            I hope you leave the country if you haven’t already.

            Do not expect. Yes I was born, lived and will die in Russia. Well, maybe not in Russia, maybe I’ll look at Europe if there’s still mobilization...
            1. +7
              6 May 2024 18: 29
              Quote from Msi
              Well, maybe not in Russia, maybe I’ll look at Europe if there’s still mobilization...
              Don't get your hopes up. If there is still mobilization, then Europe will no longer exist, or the level of radiation there will be very high.
              And the most important thing is that the Skakaus did not show initiative/initiative and did not do their best to drag the Britons into the war.
              1. Msi
                -2
                6 May 2024 18: 31
                Don't expect

                Yes, I don't mind. request Only nuclear blackmail of the West, nothing else. And words can be backed up by nuclear tests.
                1. -20
                  6 May 2024 18: 34
                  words can be supported by nuclear tests.
                  A nuclear fart into a puddle, serving as confirmation of inadequacy.
                  1. 10+
                    6 May 2024 18: 36
                    Quote: Bolt Cutter
                    words can be supported by nuclear tests.
                    A nuclear fart into a puddle, serving as confirmation of inadequacy.

                    A TRIDENT missile misfired and fell into the ocean just yards from the British nuclear submarine that launched it, The Sun reports.
                    The second launch failure in a row - following a misfire in 2016 - occurred while Defense Secretary Grant Shapps was on board HMS Vanguard to oversee the test.
                    That's for sure))))
                    1. -24
                      6 May 2024 18: 38
                      This is exactly
                      Russian missiles also sometimes fail - technology. You just don’t know about it, and you don’t want to.
                      1. 13+
                        6 May 2024 18: 40
                        So show us the successful launch of British Tridents, what's the problem? I can cite successful launches of Russian nuclear missiles.
                        You don’t understand that the entire nuclear potential of England is located on four nuclear submarines and that’s all. They do not have any ground-based nuclear missiles. There are no nuclear bombs that are launched from airplanes. Only 4 nuclear submarines and that’s it.
                      2. -20
                        6 May 2024 18: 49
                        Only 4 nuclear submarines and that’s it.
                        Two are enough to destroy a good third of the population and half of the industrial capacity. And then - the Kazan Caliphate and further in order.
                      3. 17+
                        6 May 2024 18: 59
                        Two nuclear submarines are enough to sink themselves))) If something flies further away, it will be shot down by our air defense.
                        Once again for the especially smart ones. During the Troubles, Kazan not only did not secede, but was the basis of our fighting force against the Poles.
                      4. -21
                        6 May 2024 19: 01
                        will be shot down by our air defense.
                        The capabilities of your air defense are already completely compromised. It won't be possible to knock down everything or even half of it.
                        During the Time of Troubles, Kazan
                        It was quite a long time ago, don't you think?
                      5. 11+
                        6 May 2024 19: 04
                        The capabilities of your air defense are already completely compromised. It won't be possible to knock down everything or even half of it.

                        Yeah, we’re not shooting down anything at all))) Everything is on target, everything is destroyed, there’s just ashes everywhere))) you can’t hear enough from Ukrainian propaganda.
                        It was quite a long time ago, don't you think?

                        I find Ukrainians' wet dreams funny. Even in the 90s, Kazan did not disconnect. But believe me. Belief in idiocy, the best thing that can happen to the enemy.
                      6. -18
                        6 May 2024 19: 06
                        Even in the 90s, Kazan did not disconnect.
                        Then Moscow could send loyal forces - the transport worked. But they still negotiated special conditions for themselves.
                        Yeah, we don’t knock anything down at all
                        Not everyone. And nuclear weapons are difficult targets.
                        Ukrainians' wet dreams are funny.
                        At least you are keeping up with them in this regard.
                      7. +8
                        6 May 2024 19: 08
                        What loyal forces are you carrying?
                        Of course, nuclear weapons are a difficult target, so the British nuclear submarine that fired the Trident missile did not shoot it down when it flew at this boat)))
                      8. -17
                        6 May 2024 19: 12
                        What loyal forces are you carrying?
                        Which restore constitutional order, if anything.
                        the British nuclear submarine that fired the Trident missile did not shoot it down,
                        Is it still more convenient to believe that nothing will reach us and that they are all stupid? laughing
                      9. +5
                        6 May 2024 19: 22
                        In the 90s, was constitutional order restored in Tatarstan? Did I miss something?
                        No, it’s you who stubbornly deny the fact that British missiles don’t fly. Just persist. You probably close your eyes and ears and shout “I don’t see anything, I don’t hear anything)))
                        England has only 4 ancient nuclear submarines and several old Tridents, which for the most part will not fly anywhere. And if something flies in a single case, it will be shot down.
                      10. -15
                        6 May 2024 19: 26
                        There's nothing left to say here belay
                      11. 13+
                        6 May 2024 20: 23
                        Why are you arguing with him? Citizen Boltorez is a very curious character. A citizen of Great Britain. Ethnic either by birth or citizenship, a Baltic. It would seem that life is good. But he is drawn to Russian-language resources like a magnet. The character is extremely harmful in nature, probably bile. English medicines do not help much. He is not deprived of intelligence. Like any aborigine, he is crazy about the Cargo Cult. A framed photo of Elizabeth stands on the bedside table, sometimes sheds a stingy male tear, but as an English gentleman with a Nordic character, he keeps everything to himself. Probably from there comes the bile. Very reminiscent of emigrants on Brighton Beach. Just like them, he does not like Russians, but cannot stop talking about them.
                      12. +8
                        6 May 2024 21: 18
                        Now everything is clear. Particularly his admiration for the British Army
                      13. +9
                        7 May 2024 00: 24
                        Quote: Serhio250381
                        Now everything is clear. Particularly his admiration for the British Army

                        This is the admiration of the slave-freedman.
                      14. +1
                        7 May 2024 13: 10
                        Quote: Bolt Cutter
                        And then - the Kazan Caliphate and further in order.

                        The Chechen or Tatar caliphate will simply become a more hostile and warlike neighbor in eastern Europe than Russia is now. In addition, why do you rule out the rapid occupation of Russian territory by Chinese rapid reaction forces after a thermonuclear war? And in this case, Europe will no longer receive cheap raw materials, fertilizers and metals from Russia. It is now clear that in the best case scenario, after the end of the conflict in Ukraine, Europe will receive a military-economic union of the PRC and Russia, and in the worst case, a radioactive semi-desert (thermonuclear weapons are not as omnipotent as was believed in the 1950s) from the Atlantic to Ural.
                      15. 0
                        7 May 2024 13: 31
                        Quote: Bolt Cutter
                        And then - the Kazan Caliphate and further in order.

                        The question of the existence of the Russian language in Crimea and Donbass is raised. In case of unfavorable circumstances, Russia will inevitably use thermonuclear weapons against Europe and the USA to save the people of Donetsk and Crimea. Why do you think that the Chechen or Tatar Caliphate will be such peace-loving and docile neighbors for Europe and Ukraine? The Muslim jamaat in France was able to actively influence France's position on Armenia two years ago. Besides, why don't you consider the introduction of Chinese rapid reaction forces into Russian territory after a thermonuclear war? After that, Europe will not receive resources from Russia cheaply. At best, Europe will receive a close and productive military-economic alliance between China and Russia after the end of the acute phase of the conflict in Ukraine, and at worst, a radioactive semi-desert from the Atlantic to the Urals.
                      16. 0
                        7 May 2024 23: 38
                        Are you sure that nothing else overseas will be added to the British nuclear submarines? It is unlikely that this brethren will leave their allies.
                      17. 0
                        8 May 2024 00: 15
                        Are you sure that the United States will die for the English king?
                2. 0
                  6 May 2024 19: 50
                  It’s not possible, but it’s necessary. And not only underground, but also airborne.
            2. The comment was deleted.
            3. 0
              7 May 2024 14: 45
              Only during a global conflict.... But then you will have nowhere to run.
        2. +1
          7 May 2024 10: 24
          Quote from Msi
          Right! We need to help return the Malvinas Islands to Argentina!

          I hope you will help or at least pay for it?

          Argentina will pay if it needs the Malvinas Islands.
          And if for free, then they will do it themselves, and we will cheer for them...
        3. +1
          7 May 2024 19: 48
          Why conduct large-scale operations, tactics of a thousand injections, sabotage operations, mine-explosive activities, UAV strikes, support and training of local avengers, groups, local, guerrilla actions. Better in Africa or BV and shipping bottlenecks. Put an end to the comfortable resort life, concern , let them sit behind the fence and not stick out.
        4. 0
          8 May 2024 20: 51
          After this special operation, money will no longer be needed.
      2. +2
        6 May 2024 17: 56
        return ..... Argentina! ---- krot

        What good did the President of Argentina do for the Russian Federation? request
        1. 12+
          6 May 2024 17: 58
          It's not about Argentina, it's about Britain! So that there are no colonies on Earth. And Argentina is just a country... It’s neither cold nor hot...
          1. +3
            6 May 2024 18: 04
            It’s better to let our “just” London city punish us. lol what's the proverb?
            if you sleep, then with the queen drinks
            1. +4
              6 May 2024 18: 41
              Quote: Reptiloid
              It’s better to let our “just” London city punish us. lol what's the proverb?
              if you sleep, then with the queen drinks

              You are far behind European trends, where it is now popular to sleep with the king, or at least with any of the foreign “real” (meaning with a penis) politicians. drinks
              1. +4
                6 May 2024 19: 39
                And I thought that times have changed, and there seems to be no queen recourse laughing But the proverb sounds like this wassat If we are going to demonstrate the power of Russian weapons and punish long-standing enemies, then choose a worthy target. They have been testing our patience for a very long time. It is time for them to shut up about 100-year-old fantasies.
                Who owns the Heartland ---- owns the world

                Where is the Heartland, the territory of modern Russia and the former Soviet republics
                1. +4
                  6 May 2024 20: 07
                  Quote: Reptiloid
                  Well, if you demonstrate the power of Russian weapons and punish long-standing enemies ---- then choose a worthwhile object

                  The easiest option is to start blaming the British
                  reconnaissance planes circling Russia.
                  Everyone will immediately think about it. And the States, and the Turks, and the Franks.
                  Talking about islands and bases is a waste of time. hi
                  1. +3
                    6 May 2024 20: 35
                    Welcome wink Anything, but the goal should be more solid!
                    Not a small thing! How tired I am of listening to all of them talk about how the West is not a party to the conflict!
                    1. +2
                      6 May 2024 20: 37
                      Greetings! I have been sharpening my teeth on airplanes and UAVs for a long time. wink
                      And here is a very suitable occasion. They said it and they did it.
                      There is no need to postpone it, and we can do without World War III.
                      1. +2
                        6 May 2024 20: 46
                        What else? Sikh Sunak, dark-skinned, trying so hard to curry favor, talked about attacking the Russian Federation. They have another one, also dark-skinned, a rich man in a turban and a red robe, an "aristocrat", also barking against the Russian Federation and the Russians..... Not to mention the military. So that everyone's mouths would be shut at once, so that they would forget about their fantasies forever. hi
          2. Msi
            0
            6 May 2024 18: 16
            So that there are no colonies on Earth

            And I don’t care about Great Britain and its colonies. If you strike, then only in the heart. It seems they have a Tower bridge there... for now...
        2. +1
          6 May 2024 19: 54
          He hasn’t screwed us over yet, and he hasn’t joined BRICS. Let him fight for his own islands. The times I left my hut and went to fight to give the land to the peasants in Grenada are over
      3. +3
        6 May 2024 18: 16
        Help a freak improve his rating? Hardly.
      4. +2
        6 May 2024 19: 56
        What are the islands in Argentina? The president there now is a clown worse than Zelya. It is necessary not to indulge in empty fantasies, but to tear down bridges and railway stations in Western Ukraine. So that trains with Western weapons would not arrive and Western officials would not go to Kyiv as if they were going to their home. Well, try to carry out a maritime parade in Odessa and Nikolaev, at least by mining raids. So even for this there is no political will or opportunity. And they are raving about British bases in Africa.
      5. 0
        6 May 2024 20: 02
        Quote: krot
        We need to help return the Malvinas Islands to Argentina!

        Who needs?
      6. +1
        6 May 2024 21: 50
        It’s better to hit the British Consulate General in Kuev and throw him out of Moscow back home.
      7. 0
        6 May 2024 22: 17
        Argentina chose the wrong president...
    2. +4
      6 May 2024 17: 55
      Well, what other Falklands? This is Argentina. Gibraltar is Spain, and in Africa there are no territories belonging to Great Britain. This is funny.
      We need to hit London. I think the KR Caliber will do. Let’s say that it’s not us, but the Irish rebels from Northern Ireland, we just gave them the Caliber to protect them from British aggression. They have the right.
      1. +3
        6 May 2024 18: 00
        We must hit London. Caliber-PL with a special unit.

        I am for it! And not with Caliber, but with Poseidon... So that the islands drown...
        1. +5
          6 May 2024 18: 24
          Quote: krot
          I am for it! And not Caliber but Poseidon.

          England transports military equipment through a tunnel under the English Channel. That means it needs to be destroyed. This is a significant economic loss. And in the US, the volcano is waiting impatiently for awakening. And without the use of nuclear weapons they will die. hi
      2. -14
        6 May 2024 18: 01
        We must hit London. Caliber-PL with a special unit.
        Are you good at catching rats? After a nuclear war, they will become the only source of protein in the diet of the most defeated patriots. Although who will catch whom is another question laughing .
        1. +9
          6 May 2024 18: 05
          Bolt cutter England is so small from Russia 1/6 of the land mass. The USA will only watch you drown and will not do anything.
          1. -15
            6 May 2024 18: 10
            The US will only watch
            The British nuclear arsenal is enough to cause catastrophic losses and organize the collapse of Russian statehood; if help does not come from the center, then the regions left alone with themselves will simply live their own lives. Do you know Armenian? And the United States will not watch, but will participate. Such a chance does not come often for them.
            1. 10+
              6 May 2024 18: 12
              Bolt cutter, Italy is already crying, who's next.
            2. Msi
              +4
              6 May 2024 18: 13
              The British nuclear arsenal is enough to cause catastrophic losses and organize the collapse of Russian statehood

              Bolt cutter, hi are you here now??? fool Run to the supermarket before it's too late, otherwise the migrants will hear the latest news and buy everything... Take everything you need... be careful not to get trampled...
              1. -11
                6 May 2024 18: 15
                migrants will hear the latest news
                What do migrants have to do with it? Which, by the way, are fewer here than in Russian spaces?
                1. Msi
                  +3
                  6 May 2024 18: 20
                  What does this have to do with migrants?

                  Well then the native British will trample.
                  Which, by the way, are fewer here than in Russian spaces?

                  I don’t know, in the Belgorod region the problem with migrants is not as acute as in our large cities. Well, I think it’s not very difficult to solve this problem, if only you had the desire...
            3. 10+
              6 May 2024 18: 15
              The British nuclear arsenal does not exist in nature. Tridents on British submarines under the control of the United States, the Americans have the activation codes for them. America will say nizya. Only the USA and France have nuclear arsenals from NATO countries. So what are your fantasies about setting up something there in Russia inappropriate. Moreover, the last two training launches of Tridents from British submarines ended in fiasco. Google it.
              1. -14
                6 May 2024 18: 17
                The British nuclear arsenal does not exist in nature.
                Well yes, there is only Russian laughing . We will glass everyone and nothing will happen to us for it - one of the clamps Yes .
                1. +7
                  6 May 2024 18: 18
                  At least we have clamps. In Britain we don’t have them. That’s why missiles don’t fly in Britain. Even the American Tridents can’t launch in Great Britain. Video of a failed test by the British Navy.
                  Test launch of the Trident II D5 ballistic missile from the British submarine HMS Vanguard (see below)

                  1. -14
                    6 May 2024 18: 24
                    Video of a failed test
                    In Russia, I suspect, the tests were 100% successful?
                    1. 10+
                      6 May 2024 18: 26
                      Of course. Russia builds its own missiles and does not buy Tridents and Tomahawks from the Americans. UK even purchased Ready serial missiles unable to start.
                      1. -13
                        6 May 2024 18: 31
                        Russia builds its own rockets
                        And what? The Russians are still flying, but the adversaries will all collapse belay I would not base a strategy on such statements.
                      2. +6
                        6 May 2024 18: 34
                        .I would not base a strategy on such statements.


                        Your expression is complex, as if you just proved Fermat’s theorem. The adversary (Great Britain specifically) does not have its own nuclear weapons, but there are nuclear weapons controlled by the United States and which will not fly anywhere without the permission of the United States. Ferstein?
                    2. +8
                      6 May 2024 18: 33
                      Recently, we have not had any incidents with ICBMs, unlike England, two times in a row.
                      1. -15
                        6 May 2024 18: 35
                        Recently we have had incidents with ICBMs
                        It is unlikely that they will report to you. How many submarines were lost by Russia and the Union?
                      2. +4
                        6 May 2024 18: 43
                        At least we warn about the launches of US ICBMs; if something went wrong in the USA, all the drums would beat with joy.
                      3. -10
                        6 May 2024 18: 44
                        I repeat the question - How many submarines were lost by Russia and the Union?
                      4. +3
                        6 May 2024 18: 56
                        Quote: Bolt Cutter
                        It is unlikely that they will report to you.

                        Each test of ICBMs and SLBMs is carried out with notification of the potential enemy. And this enemy watches him almost from the beginning (“Maryata”, yes...) to the end. The final section of the warhead - the Kura training ground - has long been closely monitored by stationary and maritime radars built specifically for this purpose.
                        So any mistake immediately becomes known.
                      5. 0
                        6 May 2024 18: 58
                        You were probably informed about the incidents. Well, share the information with us.
          2. -11
            6 May 2024 18: 19
            The bolt cutter is generally right, but all this is not even worth a squabble. And tralflot don’t get excited. We had 1/6 of the land (excluding Antarctica) under the Tsar and under the USSR. And now - alas.
            In serious politics, everything is done according to cold calculation, but once a decision is made, there is no turning back.
            And only boys, movie heroes and deceived women take revenge. Men solve problems, but they solve them definitively.
            1. +5
              6 May 2024 18: 26
              The USA never gets into a fight, they always choose the strongest. With their own interest.
              1. -3
                6 May 2024 18: 30
                You are familiar with the sea, which means you treat the elements with respect. Don't fool around. So it is here: the main thing is not revenge, but the position gained or the damage prevented.
                Well, prestige for internal consumption is Skabeeva’s business, and for external consumption it is Zakharova’s business. Well, without women - nowhere!
        2. +4
          6 May 2024 18: 20
          the diet of the most defeated patriots.

          Patriots of what? Ukraine, USA, England?
          1. -11
            6 May 2024 18: 22
            Patriots of what?
            In this case, mainly Russia.
            1. +7
              6 May 2024 18: 26
              But this will not affect the patriots of Ukraine, the USA and England. I understand, this is different. There are good patriots there, and bad ones here.
              1. -18
                6 May 2024 18: 32
                This will not affect Ukraine, the USA and England.
                It will be possible to survive with fewer losses and maintain statehood in the USA and England. In Russia, it’s unlikely.
                1. +6
                  6 May 2024 18: 34
                  Ahahaha, if someone in Europe is saved, it will obviously not be shaved))) And your USA won’t lift a finger to save the English king and it didn’t give up. Because patriots of Ukraine, the USA and England, moderate your ardor until Tridents are taught to fly at least 100 from the launch site
                  1. -14
                    6 May 2024 18: 37
                    obviously they won't be shaved
                    And it is unlikely that the Russians will hold a parade of sovereignties after the nuclear exchange.
                    1. +5
                      6 May 2024 18: 38
                      Quote: Bolt Cutter
                      And it is unlikely that the Russians will hold a parade of sovereignties after the nuclear exchange.

                      Wet dreams of Ukrainians. I've been hearing this for 20 years. For some reason the parade is taking place in Ukraine, but everyone is talking about Russia
                      1. -15
                        6 May 2024 18: 40
                        Wet dreams of Ukrainians.
                        It will not be possible to connect the regions and provide forceful support for order after nuclear strikes; the remnants of the regions will be left to their own devices, and one can only guess what forces will emerge in conditions of anarchy. We can confidently say that no one will vote for EDRO.
                      2. +2
                        6 May 2024 18: 43
                        Yes, yes, what an insidious plan. The main thing is to believe in it when you leave the last territories of Ukraine. Even during the turmoil, no one broke away from Russia. Even Kazan.
                      3. -11
                        6 May 2024 18: 46
                        leave the last territories of Ukraine
                        I was a tourist there three times. Your belief that “everything will happen and nothing will happen to us” is surprising.
                      4. +2
                        6 May 2024 18: 49
                        Cool, I was a tourist. It was your dedication to this that led to what is happening in Ukraine. Let's make a military coup. And we will kill all opponents. And we will kill all the inhabitants of Donbass. And we’ll start a war with Russia. And... and bam everything came to you for your actions. Who would have expected?
                      5. -9
                        6 May 2024 18: 52
                        bam you got it all
                        Nothing came to anyone.
                      6. -2
                        6 May 2024 18: 56
                        Nothing came to anyone.

                        Of course, of course... of course
        3. +2
          6 May 2024 18: 27
          Quote: Bolt Cutter
          Are you good at catching rats?

          laughing Catch the rats yourself! And the bream will definitely come from the Osetr! wassat
          1. -9
            6 May 2024 18: 28
            the bream will definitely be from Osetra
            Only these breams will eat people themselves Yes .
            1. +3
              6 May 2024 18: 32
              Quote: Bolt Cutter
              Only these breams will eat people themselves.

              Our ancestors ate mammoths! And here are the products of fauna, tasty and varied. Although there is no accounting for taste, you can eat frogs and rats. wassat
      3. +2
        6 May 2024 18: 17
        Or through the Houthis through British shipping in the Red Sea?
        1. +4
          6 May 2024 18: 18
          Well, I’ve been saying this for a long time now that BECs need to be shared.
    3. -1
      7 May 2024 07: 35
      There will be no attacks on territories outside of Ukraine
    4. 0
      7 May 2024 08: 32
      Quote: ROSS 42
      British missiles have already attacked Russian territory, and we are selecting targets...
      Hitting anyone will be a good warning.

      Choose any small uninhabited island off the coast of Britain and strike it with Caliber. I believe this will be the most effective way to calm down the small-shaven people. This will demonstrate our capabilities and our determination.
      1. +1
        7 May 2024 08: 35
        Quote: Krasnoyarsk
        Choose any small uninhabited island off the coast of Britain and strike it with Caliber.

        So the late VVZh already suggested:

        1. 0
          7 May 2024 08: 47
          Quote: ROSS 42
          Quote: Krasnoyarsk
          Choose any small uninhabited island off the coast of Britain and strike it with Caliber.

          So the late VVZh already suggested:

          1. Zhirinovsky is not my idol and never has been. Moreover, I believe that it was he who made his rather large contribution to the strengthening of Ukrainians’ hatred of Russia.
          2. Speaking about "Caliber" I meant the non-nuclear equipment of its warhead.
          1. 0
            7 May 2024 08: 55
            Quote: Krasnoyarsk
            Moreover, I believe that it was he who made his rather large contribution to the strengthening of Ukrainians’ hatred of Russia.

            How cool it is to blame a dead man for everything...
            Is it okay that not everyone in Ukraine loved Russians and supported brotherhood?
            Back in the 70s, we were on duty (calculating) who was trying so hard to light crosses on the hills and hills on April 20... It turned out - the grandchildren of Bandera’s underdogs...
            But Zhirinovsky is still to blame...
            Who is innocent then? Who gave us June 12 and November 4?
            We didn’t live before... We wore galoshes... We wore second-hand items, used abandoned ones...
            1. -1
              7 May 2024 09: 30
              Quote: ROSS 42

              How cool it is to blame a dead man for everything...
              Is it okay that not everyone in Ukraine loved Russians and supported brotherhood?

              I don’t want to offend, but still, what are you exaggerating as a woman?
              This is not an accusation, but a statement of fact to which I was a direct witness.
              Yes, there were those who did not like Russians. And these were the inhabitants of the West. Outskirts. But the overwhelming majority treated the Russians evenly. But your idol, with his bad language, increased the number of the former and decreased the number of the latter.
              Quote: ROSS 42
              Who gave us June 12 and November 4?

              Their mistake is that they bought the government of the Outskirts with all sorts of preferences in trade (which (preferences) the people of the Outskirts did not know), and the adversary bought the media of the Outskirts and individual “politicians” thereof, and they were already singing to the people what was beneficial to the adversary. It was the adversary who kindled the fire of hatred of Ukrainians towards Russia, and Zhirinovsky threw logs into this fire.
              Do you think there is a language problem brewing within the Outskirts? Not at all.
              This is an adversary's injection. First through the “Nightingale Ukrainian language”, which Russia allegedly spread rot on, and then through the “barking Russian language”.
              1. +1
                7 May 2024 09: 36
                Definitely “Krasnoyarsk”, and not some “Birobidzhan” or “Jerusalem”?
                What are these nasty habits of resorting to latent insults?
                Quote: Krasnoyarsk
                As a woman you are exaggerating

                Have you looked at yourself in the mirror lately? If there is nothing more new on the topic, then shingle is new...
                1. -2
                  7 May 2024 09: 41
                  Quote: ROSS 42

                  What are these nasty habits of resorting to latent insults?

                  So behave like a man, and don’t invent something that doesn’t exist.
                  I repeat, I didn’t want to offend you, you just forced me to say what I said. hi
    5. +1
      7 May 2024 10: 48
      Quote: ROSS 42
      British missiles have already attacked Russian territory, and we are selecting targets...
      Hitting anyone will be a good warning.

      If it were possible to capture the entire undamaged installation and a couple of missiles, then it would be possible to give the small Britons a surprise by launching their missiles from an unexpected place at targets on their territory!
  2. Msi
    -3
    6 May 2024 17: 35
    Falklands, Gibraltar, bases in Africa: Western experts voice versions regarding British military facilities

    Western experts sit in Europe and shit. They propose some uninteresting, secondary goals.
    1. +1
      6 May 2024 17: 57
      These Experts are messing with the minds of the electorate. As always.
      1. +1
        6 May 2024 18: 28
        Quote: Reptiloid
        These Experts are messing with the minds of the electorate. As always.

        Yes! "Throw me into the thorn bush" laughing I already read this somewhere. hi
  3. +5
    6 May 2024 17: 35
    The jackals were crowing! laughing Lavrov made a fuss about the “civilized” ones. And how quickly everyone began to jump up and point their fingers at the Saxons. laughing
    1. -2
      7 May 2024 08: 54
      Quote: Fatalist
      Lavrov brought rustle to

      Lavrov? rustle? Don't tell my slippers. Apart from concern, and he believes that this is very scary for the “partners,” Lavrov can do nothing more.
      “Lavrov made some noise...” Laughing and falling suddenly.
  4. +4
    6 May 2024 17: 37
    The British Air Force base on Malvinas is far from Port Stanley. Miley is a guy who has nothing sacred. He decided not to fight with China. I mentioned the rock on the Rockall Bank in the post below, but according to maritime law it is not English.
  5. 0
    6 May 2024 17: 37
    Our Foreign Ministry members will personally turn the British globe inside out wassat
    1. +8
      6 May 2024 17: 52
      Let's see what these words of our Foreign Ministry are worth. Let's wait, we'll applaud later... Unless this is an empty bluff
  6. +7
    6 May 2024 17: 39
    In small Britain they began to be afraid and think about it, which is good. It’s bad if our words remain just words, then the insolent people (and others like them) will become even more insolent.
  7. +3
    6 May 2024 17: 41
    It smells like World War 3... Hurray or alas?
    1. +6
      6 May 2024 17: 45
      Yes, it's too early. And your question is one of those: is the glass half empty or half full? So, are you suggesting that we turn the other cheek?
      1. +6
        6 May 2024 17: 48
        Come on, I only understand the Old Testament - an eye for an eye...
        1. +4
          6 May 2024 17: 49
          Oh our man! wink (Short comment).
      2. 0
        6 May 2024 18: 46
        Quote: Fatalist
        the glass is half empty or half full.

        Or maybe the container is not the right size? laughing
        1. 0
          6 May 2024 20: 16
          Madam, you know better. love (Short comment).
    2. Msi
      0
      6 May 2024 17: 45
      Hurray or alas?

      Alas... There is no choice...
    3. -2
      6 May 2024 17: 46
      Hurray or alas?

      Hurray, alas!))))
    4. -3
      6 May 2024 18: 25
      In this case there is no smell of anything. Preparations were not carried out, forces were not allocated, the reaction of the United States and NATO was not even considered. A statement to let off steam. Russian Sevastopol and Kerch are quite familiar with Storm Shadow. So, as it was, so it will be. And let the miscarriages of legal science deal with the “legitimacy of the attack on our territory.”
    5. 0
      6 May 2024 18: 39
      Quote: Sergey Averchenkov
      It smells like World War 3... Hurray or alas?

      There is a limit to everything, even the great patience of the Russian Federation. Not "Hurray" and not "Alas", I would say - unfortunately hi
    6. 0
      7 May 2024 08: 57
      Quote: Sergey Averchenkov
      It smells like World War 3... Hurray or alas?

      There will be no 3rd World War, but only if our Foreign Ministry and Defense Ministry behave not like bumblers, but decisively and boldly.
  8. 0
    6 May 2024 17: 42
    You can wash away this island with Poseidon.
  9. +6
    6 May 2024 17: 43
    Why bomb Gibraltar? Our official statement that we consider its separation from Spain to be illegal is enough, and we will assist in its return to the jurisdiction of Madrid.
    Throwing a stone of discord at the ranks of NATO will be more effective than bombing!
  10. +3
    6 May 2024 17: 45
    If they said it so loudly, it means they are ready to strike and there is already a target. request
  11. +6
    6 May 2024 17: 49
    Quote from Msi
    They offer some uninteresting, secondary goals.

    Well, why are they uninteresting? I am for the contingent in Estonia. Four birds with one stone - arrogants and tribalts.
    1. -18
      6 May 2024 17: 57
      Four birds with one stone
      And a war with all of NATO. Taking into account the successes in Ukraine, it is guaranteed to be a losing one.
      1. +3
        6 May 2024 18: 04
        Well, well, I'm a loser. NATO is already removing its weapons from combat duty and transferring them to the Ukrainian Armed Forces. We have been at war with NATO for 2 years, have we woken up?
        1. -14
          6 May 2024 18: 06
          We have been at war with NATO for 2 years now.
          NATO aircraft did not come to the war, but these are minor things. Ukrainians are actually fighting with scraps from the NATO table.
          1. 0
            6 May 2024 18: 09
            And this saved her from extinction. The fact that they transferred hundreds of units of Soviet-made aircraft to the Ukrainian Armed Forces does not count, right? We are increasing the production of air defense, plus we have reserves in some allied countries. And NATO is now removing its air defense from its combat duty and transferring it to the Ukrainian Armed Forces to replace what has already been destroyed. But that's okay. All major NATO military bases (in Europe) will be destroyed by nuclear weapons
            1. -16
              6 May 2024 18: 13
              We are increasing air defense production
              What will be left from the factories is scrap metal, if anything.
              And this saved her from extinction.
              It is in every way more powerful than the Russian one. So it's unlikely.
              1. +3
                6 May 2024 18: 17
                What will be left from the factories is scrap metal, if anything.

                From which factory? Which one is in Germany? Where else are air defense factories in Europe?
                It is in every way more powerful than the Russian one. So it's unlikely.

                Yes, yes, Bayraktars are more powerful, Javelins are more powerful, Leopards and Abrams are more powerful, Patriots are more powerful, everything is more powerful... but where is it all? On Poklonnaya Hill
                1. -11
                  6 May 2024 18: 21
                  Which one is in Germany?
                  No, where you are increasing production. These are not dill with maviks.
                  Yes, yes, Bayraktars are more powerful
                  NATO has more than 3 thousand modern combat aircraft at its disposal. How many are knocking down two dozen Ukrainian ski planes already?
                  1. 0
                    6 May 2024 18: 32
                    No, where you are increasing production. These are not dill with maviks.

                    These are shavers with their own Tridents falling on their heads
                    NATO has more than 3 thousand modern combat aircraft at its disposal. How many are knocking down two dozen Ukrainian ski planes already?

                    Yeah, and all 3t, as one, will fly towards us. How much artillery and air defense does NATO have? And what time is it? And there is no need to lie about the two dozen aircraft the Ukrainian Armed Forces have. NATO supplied them with several hundred Soviet-made aircraft and helicopters. And where are they? Where are the armadas of Ukrainian planes bombing our troops and cities? Where are the large-scale transfers of troops by helicopter? Where are the helicopters attacking our tanks? Where are the Bayraktars with whom you frightened us so much?
            2. 0
              6 May 2024 18: 47
              Quote: Serhio250381
              The fact that they transferred hundreds of units of Soviet-made aircraft to the Ukrainian Armed Forces does not count, right?

              28 aircraft and 87 helicopters, according to Shoigu by the end of 2023.
              No, it doesn't count.
              Quote: Serhio250381
              And this saved her from extinction.

              If we talk only about the aviation of European NATO members, then we could somehow fight with them, in the sense that they would strike our territory and our troops, but they would pay a high price for it. But if the USA... then we would be crushed instantly.
              Quote: Serhio250381
              All major NATO military bases (in Europe) will be destroyed by nuclear weapons

              Will not. Otherwise there will be no left for the USA. And the existing airfield network, even without the largest air bases, is more than enough for them to deploy
              1. -3
                6 May 2024 18: 55
                28 aircraft and 87 helicopters, according to Shoigu by the end of 2023.
                No, it doesn't count.

                These are supplies at the time of the Northern Military District, but even before the Northern Military District the Ukrainian army was armed there.
                Will not. Otherwise there will be no left for the USA. And the existing airfield network, even without the largest air bases, is more than enough for them to deploy

                Why won't they? because you said so? Who needs your network without planes? All planes are located at the base, but others are scattered across networks. Now NATO is building large bases on our borders, rather than scattering its weapons across networks. Everything is in one place
                1. 0
                  6 May 2024 19: 08
                  Quote: Serhio250381
                  These are supplies at the time of the Northern Military District, but even before the Northern Military District the Ukrainian army was armed there.

                  Before the SVO, no one gave any aircraft to the Ukrainian Armed Forces.
                  Quote: Serhio250381
                  Why won't they? because you said so?

                  Because our number of carriers is not enough to destroy the United States. We’ll drive them into the Stone Age, we’ll kill 150 million people, but that’s all. Therefore, there is no particular reason to hammer strategic nuclear forces at the Europeans - a few cruise missiles with nuclear warheads and tactical nuclear weapons, this is perhaps the maximum that we can afford.
                  Quote: Serhio250381
                  who needs your network without planes?

                  Are you even aware of how NATO fights? Just imagine, they will disperse before attacking.
                  Quote: Serhio250381
                  Now NATO is building large bases on our borders, rather than scattering its weapons across networks.

                  Even 5% of their forces cannot be deployed at these “large bases.”
                  Quote: Serhio250381
                  Everything is in one place

                  Only in your fantasies
                  1. -5
                    6 May 2024 19: 17
                    In total, Ukrainian Armed Forces aviation losses from February 24 to July 10.07.2023, 273 amounted to XNUMX aircraft. Where do so many planes come from? These are official figures from the Russian Ministry of Defense.
                    Firstly, our carriers are enough to destroy not only the United States, but the entire world. Secondly, as I already said, they will bomb Europe. The USA will not try to take revenge for the Queen of England, forgive the king.
                    I and the whole world have seen how NATO fights. This is something at the level of our army at the beginning of the Northern Military District. In fact, all their teachings speak about this. All their military operations speak about this. About the same as the Israeli army in Palestine.
                    5% of what will be deployed? What forces are you talking about? Significant NATO forces are the United States and Türkiye. Türkiye will not participate. And US forces are spread out all over the world.
                    No, this is not my fantasy, this is reality. The USA (NATO) is building large bases where large armed formations are driven
                    1. 0
                      6 May 2024 19: 32
                      Quote: Serhio250381
                      In total, Ukrainian Armed Forces aviation losses from February 24 to July 10.07.2023, 273 amounted to XNUMX aircraft. Where do so many planes come from? These are official figures from the Russian Ministry of Defense.

                      Have you been interested in the size of the Ukrainian Air Force? They had about 90-126 combat aircraft at the beginning of the Northern Military District. But this does not include the reserve - aircraft that are on the ground, but which, theoretically, after a good repair can still be lifted into the air. Most of the planes that the Ministry of Defense reported about being destroyed are exactly that. Plus, they destroyed a number of non-airborne aircraft. Not peaceful airliners, of course, but all sorts of transport ships, etc.
                      Quote: Serhio250381
                      Firstly, our carriers are enough to destroy not only the United States, but the entire world.

                      Apparently, just as you fell asleep during the Soviet era, you just woke up today. We cannot destroy any “world”. The USSR could do this, with its more than 40 thousand warheads. And we, with our approximately 1400, are long gone.
                      Quote: Serhio250381
                      I and the whole world have seen how NATO fights. This is something at the level of our army at the beginning of the Northern Military District.

                      In a dream, or what? Read at least something about Storm in a glass. How the Americans destroyed Iraq’s air defense from the air in one day (more powerful than that of the Ukrainian Armed Forces, by the way) and then did what they wanted, completely nullifying the Iraqi superiority in ground forces
                      Quote: Serhio250381
                      5% of what will be deployed? What forces are you talking about?

                      About the air ones we were talking about
                      Quote: Serhio250381
                      The USA (NATO) is building large bases where large armed formations are driven

                      Which are there only in peacetime and disperse in preparation for war
                      1. -3
                        6 May 2024 19: 45
                        I thought about it and think that these are NATO supplies. And everything that stood on the ground was either destroyed or was not capable of flying.
                        1400 charges are enough for the whole world, certainly enough for the USA. Plus we have a lot of stuff in storage. The English WIKI says that we have 5800 nuclear warheads and no one else in the world has more. And we have 1700 deployed, which is also the largest number.

                        Yes, in a dream. How many dorons did the Americans destroy in “Storm in a Teacup”? How did they protect themselves from them? As far as I remember, the Americans were not able to shoot down a single Iraqi ballistic missile. Oh, oh, and the F117s also performed great there. How are we going to counteract the F117? They can’t be seen? All these storms in glasses, in deserts and so on, mean gathering tank columns in one place and attacking. Now all these columns will be taken out in an hour. The United States still does not make barbecues for its tanks, even on Ukrainian Abrams.
                        Can you find out where they will disperse? Just a crazy plan, let's gather everything in one place and then run away. Or maybe it will immediately disperse? Nevermind, what could go wrong? Well, for example, a strike before dispersal?
                      2. +1
                        6 May 2024 21: 12
                        Quote: Serhio250381
                        I thought about it and think that these are NATO supplies.

                        (heavy sigh) Consider that everyone has the right to wear rose-colored glasses at their own discretion. I won’t even ask where NATO could get hundreds of MiG-29s capable of flying and where the Ukrainian Armed Forces got pilots capable of fighting on them
                        Quote: Serhio250381
                        1400 charges are enough for the whole world, certainly enough for the USA.

                        Study the damaging factors of a nuclear explosion. Then you will understand that to destroy a city of over a million people you will need at least 10 warheads of 100 Kt each. And if we take into account urban development, then this is approximately 1 warhead per 100 thousand people. That is, 1 warheads when firing at cities will kill about 400 million people. In the USA, if anything, there are more than 140 million people.
                        Quote: Serhio250381
                        Here the English WIKI says that we have 5800 nuclear warheads and no one else in the world has more

                        Yes. This is if you take it together with tactical nuclear weapons, but it will not reach the USA
                        Quote: Serhio250381
                        Yes, in a dream. How many dorons did the Americans destroy in “Storm in a Teacup”? How did they protect themselves from them? As far as I remember, the Americans were not able to shoot down a single Iraqi ballistic missile.

                        Actually 47 out of 132 launched
                        Quote: Serhio250381
                        All these storms in glasses, in deserts and so on, mean gathering tank columns in one place and attacking.

                        God. Yes, teach the materiel at least a little! What kind of tank columns are there in one place? :))))
                        The Americans knocked out the Iraqi air defense system in one day and finished off the remnants for two more days, and there were hundreds of missile defense missile launchers there. After that, they calmly operated over all of Iraq, dropping tens of thousands of bombs from strategic bombers.
                        The whole point is that they simply cut off the supply of Iraqi military groups and hit them from above - after they were left without supplies for a little over a month and their heavy weapons were largely knocked out, they lost most of their combat effectiveness. And that’s when the ground forces of the MNF went into battle - they essentially only finished off what was left after the aviation.
                        Quote: Serhio250381
                        Can you find out where they will disperse? Just a crazy plan, let's gather everything in one place and then run away. Or maybe it will immediately disperse? Nevermind, what could go wrong?

                        I would strongly advise you to study at least the basics of military strategy and tactics before messing around. Then you will know that in peacetime troops are grouped around large bases, so it is more convenient to supply them, service them, etc. But as soon as it smells like something is fried, they disperse so as not to become victims of the enemy’s first strike. I repeat, these are the basics.
                        Quote: Serhio250381
                        Well, for example, a strike before dispersal?

                        Are you planning to hit Europe with nuclear weapons preemptively, even before they prepare to attack?
                      3. -4
                        6 May 2024 21: 20
                        Sorry, the text is too big. I don’t have the strength to read and respond to everything, there will be even more later.
      2. +4
        6 May 2024 18: 07
        Bolt cutter, carefully study NATO Article 5, letter by letter.
        1. -13
          6 May 2024 18: 12
          Article 5 of NATO, spelled out
          They are quite holding on to Ukraine, but will they study the article about NATO’s key partner?
          1. +4
            6 May 2024 18: 23
            Of course they will study it. Under a microscope. And no one is whistling in the West about Russia and nuclear blackmail. Biden is in a "coma", it will take time to bring him to his senses. wassat
            1. -5
              6 May 2024 18: 27
              Biden in a "coma"
              Biden for the show - others decide. At the very least, it is naive to expect that a united enemy superior in everything will simply give up ground and not take the chance to finally resolve the issue in its favor.
      3. 0
        6 May 2024 18: 39
        Don't rush, you are our mighty one!
        Ambition without results is the fate of the Poles, not the British. War between Russia and all NATO can be declared by the United States when it is ready, and no one else. And if they are upset, they will kick you away and say “it’s your own fault.” Soon, according to my estimates, within a year, a naval blockade will be declared on Russia, and then everything will begin. That is if we don't warn you.
        I don’t know if you still have a Temple in honor of the pilots of the RAF Bomber Command. If the scoundrels from the international have not yet demolished it, go, sit and try to understand. They did not return from the flight, but they knew why they died.
        1. -9
          6 May 2024 18: 43
          Don't rush, you are our mighty one!
          This is an activity for Russian patriots - I’m just surprised.
          if they are off their feet
          To let the brakes fall on a nuclear strike on a key ally means to admit one's own impotence. After that, the Nigerian Navy will sail to take Texas, and Mexico will take Alaska. Therefore, there will be no such inaction.
          1. -3
            6 May 2024 18: 48
            And don’t expect them to send out an information wave, shoot someone somewhere,
            They’ll write on Twitter and calm down until the end of the PREPARATORY STAGE, and then...
            You go to the temple, if you are safe, everything falls into place there by itself.
            1. -4
              6 May 2024 18: 51
              , they’ll write on Twitter and calm down
              Exactly the same calculation was made at the beginning of the SVO. Didn't get through wassat .
              1. -2
                6 May 2024 18: 56
                Well, if you take into account Burns’ meetings with Naryshkin, it just worked out. It’s just that someone failed everything they could, but this is already an excess of the performer and a failure of the special services.
                And yes, you were very lonely in 1940, despite some help from the United States. But they were ready to cheat you for a bonus. The artist made a mistake - he wanted to come to an agreement with you. Education failed, you didn’t want to come to an agreement in principle. Not the Czechs and not the French.
          2. 0
            7 May 2024 10: 52
            Iran under Trump launched a missile strike on a US base (in response to the murder of its general) and what? They quietly wiped their hands and didn't even wave their fists, let alone respond...
  12. +1
    6 May 2024 17: 49
    What does it mean - "....British missiles will fly deep into Russia...."? Is Crimea “the depth of Russia”? Or are there “territories of Russia”, and there are “not so territories of Russia”? Why make statements if you are not going to (cannot) fulfill them? The British are now specially organizing a strike against Ukraine with their missiles, knowing that there will be no consequences.
    1. -3
      6 May 2024 18: 00
      The British are now specially organizing a strike against Ukraine with their missiles, knowing that there will be no consequences.

      Unfortunately, this is most likely the case.
    2. -1
      6 May 2024 18: 03
      yes, yes, the British are specially organizing to get tinsel. Most likely, a large-scale attack on the Crimean Bridge or something like that is being prepared, and the Britons have been warned. Now things are so bad for the Ukrainian Armed Forces that our army feels the strength to fight NATO countries
      1. +2
        6 May 2024 18: 09
        I agree that a strike on the Crimean Bridge is being prepared. Maybe not only on the bridge, but I have doubts about the rest. Well, the Anglo-Saxons don't take our "warnings" seriously anymore.
        1. +1
          6 May 2024 18: 12
          They didn’t understand when the Ukrainian Armed Forces were retreating. When the counterattack was held back. When our forces in Ukraine were in the region of 100-150 tons. When there were no shells. Now the situation has changed radically. The Ukrainian Armed Forces are losing with all the might of NATO. Russia is increasing its potential, both in production and in manpower. There is already strength for a direct conflict with NATO.
  13. -1
    6 May 2024 17: 54
    It's high time to hit the NATO countries. The best way is through the Channel Tunnel. Both the Britons and the French will get it there, but this is unlikely. Most likely Africa. Possibly Estonia. The Falkland Islands and Gibraltar are the most incredible targets. Argentina does not need a war with England, and Spain is an ally of England and Morocco and Algeria will not get involved in this.
  14. +2
    6 May 2024 18: 01
    Well, if the “flow” bursts, then the British Petroleum towers will answer. Also - “objects”. And ends in the water. Let them look for Houthi submarines. laughing
  15. +2
    6 May 2024 18: 02
    Maybe it's time to drown this island? All the same, if there are ethnic “thin” people there, they are no longer ours, and the rest are pederasts. Therefore, we don’t feel sorry for them. But look, there would be fewer wars on earth...
  16. 0
    6 May 2024 18: 03
    Strikes at weapons warehouses so that everything there blows up into the air. They'll quiet down. That no one supplied weapons to Ukraine.
  17. 0
    6 May 2024 18: 03
    Quote: Bolt Cutter
    And a war with all of NATO.

    So if they are going to bang, then whatever. And America may still not fit in with these za-tsev, they will say it’s their own fault. They are Americans, they smell like it’s fried, they try to disappear into the bushes.
  18. 0
    6 May 2024 18: 06
    Quote: Vladimir M
    Or are there “territories of Russia”, and there are “not so territories of Russia”?

    For us there is no difference. But for the West, there are territories that they recognize, and there are, like, occupied ones, which would not be a sin to hit. And now they are already brazenly talking about the old territories. So they were warned. And as far as a real response will follow if something happens, we’ll see...
  19. 0
    6 May 2024 18: 14
    We need to hit only London...
  20. 0
    6 May 2024 18: 16
    We'll just look on the map for all sorts of Falklands and bases in Africa - we'll just take and drown this filthy island tongue
  21. 0
    6 May 2024 18: 19
    Launch a dummy with “The Second Real” leaflets.
  22. +1
    6 May 2024 18: 22
    any military facilities and equipment of Great Britain on the territory of Ukraine and beyond its borders can become
    If only this doesn't turn out to be another red line
  23. +4
    6 May 2024 18: 24
    Falklands, Gibraltar, bases in Africa: Western experts voice versions regarding British military facilities that could become targets for the Russian Armed Forces

    If only these “experts” could explain why we need them! fellow
    Why should we have them as targets if, apparently, there are no direct military actions between our states yet?
    And if there is a war between us, we will not target the bases alone. we will bring down all small Britain to the bottom of the ocean so that the Englishwoman will finally “stop trashing” Russia.
    No, the bases will also get it, apparently to hell, since we will have graters, but we will try to erase the landon first, because we got it with our scoundrels!!! am
  24. +2
    6 May 2024 18: 34
    Well, since such a booze has begun, I will allow myself to make an absolutely sober proposal: there are British bases in blessed Cyprus... And Syria is nearby.
  25. 0
    6 May 2024 18: 42
    You can simply help the Houthis with rackets. They will quickly clear the surrounding waters of British ships.
  26. +1
    6 May 2024 19: 16
    Why did they bring red markers to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs? Again empty chatter and an attempt to intimidate the Britons. No one in the world believes in our horror stories anymore, too often they turned out to be dummies, like what if they fall for it. And in the end, Belgorod is regularly shelled by Czech vampires. And the Czechs get away with everything...
  27. 0
    6 May 2024 19: 59
    may well become military installations on the territory of Great Britain itself.

    Not “completely”, but should be goals in the first place, and it should have been yesterday...
  28. 0
    6 May 2024 20: 23
    How would Argentina react to a nuclear attack on the Maldives? And Spain according to Gibraltar?
  29. bbb
    0
    6 May 2024 20: 30
    There is also a tunnel under the strait.
  30. 0
    6 May 2024 22: 05
    They don’t answer: they change diapers. Well, I hope that the note was handed over at four o’clock in the morning...
  31. 0
    6 May 2024 22: 07
    Quote: Bolt Cutter
    will be shot down by our air defense.
    The capabilities of your air defense are already completely compromised. It won't be possible to knock down everything or even half of it.
    During the Time of Troubles, Kazan
    It was quite a long time ago, don't you think?

    The Agla and Batyr battalions will remind you
  32. -2
    6 May 2024 22: 49
    These do not accept red lines, I remember how they pointedly entered our waters near Crimea on a military ship. Even now we will shoot demonstratively along the course, but not at the target. PS They pointed at the cruiser Moscow and gave target designation to the stripes. And here in the Kremlin they reacted to this like an ostrich to a threat, with their ass in a pose.
  33. -1
    7 May 2024 02: 21
    Quote from Storm1978
    Why are you arguing with him? Citizen Boltorez is a very curious character. A citizen of Great Britain. Ethnic either by birth or citizenship, a Baltic. It would seem that life is good. But he is drawn to Russian-language resources like a magnet. The character is extremely harmful in nature, probably bile. English medicines do not help much. He is not deprived of intelligence. Like any aborigine, he is crazy about the Cargo Cult. A framed photo of Elizabeth stands on the bedside table, sometimes sheds a stingy male tear, but as an English gentleman with a Nordic character, he keeps everything to himself. Probably from there comes the bile. Very reminiscent of emigrants on Brighton Beach. Just like them, he does not like Russians, but cannot stop talking about them.

    Have you visited Brighton often? They treat Russian speakers absolutely normally. They are the majority there
  34. 0
    7 May 2024 04: 39
    Well, since the answer most likely will not come from nuclear war, the territory of Estonia and the African continent fit well into the paradigm of the answer.
    And in general, this fits into the script of the play (which has been running since 2014), like act 2 or 3.
  35. 0
    7 May 2024 05: 12
    Is no one considering the option of shooting down British reconnaissance aircraft, according to data from which attacks on Russian territory are taking place?
  36. -1
    7 May 2024 07: 28
    Britain is a member of NATO, it cannot be attacked, and British missiles are already flying into Russian territory (well, if the Ukrainian Armed Forces do not fire them at themselves, of course).

    If our leadership has decided to unleash a third world war, then we can begin.
  37. 0
    7 May 2024 07: 34
    Wouldn't it be easier to shoot down a British reconnaissance plane over the Black Sea?
  38. 0
    7 May 2024 11: 02
    Quote: S.Z.
    Britain is a member of NATO, it cannot be attacked, and British missiles are already flying into Russian territory (well, if the Ukrainian Armed Forces do not fire them at themselves, of course).

    If our leadership has decided to unleash a third world war, then we can begin.

    1. British missiles did not fly into Russian territory until 1991.
    2. If NATO can’t attack Russia, then why can’t Russia attack NATO? If the leadership of the Russian Federation thinks so, then immediate capitulation is better.
    3. The NATO leadership decided to unleash the war, as far as I understand. NATO is threatening to directly fight from Russia to Ukraine and to shell Russian territory. And whether the escalation will lead to the use of tactical or strategic nuclear weapons depends on the NATO leadership.
  39. 0
    8 May 2024 17: 33
    It is necessary to hit the territory of England itself... So that the insolent people understand that they are finished