The Russian Foreign Ministry threatened to attack British targets if British missiles were used to strike Russian territory

356 078 134
The Russian Foreign Ministry threatened to attack British targets if British missiles were used to strike Russian territory

Russian Federation in case of application missiles of British manufacture on the territory of our state reserves the right to strike any military facilities of Great Britain, including those outside Ukraine. This was reported in the official statement of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation, published on the website of the department.

Earlier, British Foreign Secretary David Cameron said that British-made missiles could be used to strike Russian territory.



After this, the British Ambassador was summoned to the Russian Foreign Ministry. The Russian diplomatic department called on the UK authorities to think about what catastrophic consequences such actions could lead to.

The Ambassador was told that the Russian side views D. Cameron’s words as evidence of a serious escalation and confirmation of London’s increasing involvement in military operations on the side of Kyiv

- emphasized in the official statement of the Russian Foreign Ministry.

Thus, Russia expresses its readiness to take radical retaliatory measures in the event of the use of British long-range missiles against Russian targets. It is time for the UK authorities to understand that such actions on the part of London will lead to the risk of a major escalation in Europe, including a direct military conflict between Russia and the countries of the North Atlantic Alliance.
134 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. + 43
    6 May 2024 17: 04
    This is our opinion!!! Finally! The parasitic nation must be eradicated from the planet!
    good angry good
    1. + 21
      6 May 2024 17: 06
      Seriously...??? Do not joke...??? Well, finally, thank God... good drinks
      1. + 35
        6 May 2024 17: 10
        Quote: krot
        This is our opinion!!! Finally! The parasitic nation must be eradicated from the planet!

        Well said, but let's see what happens in reality:
        Once again we will express concern or, indeed, we will hit you in the teeth.
        1. +3
          6 May 2024 17: 28
          Finally, I felt again that our country is great!
          1. + 15
            7 May 2024 01: 17
            Early on you felt that these were just words. Of which, since February 2022, a great many have been uttered, starting from Putin and going down to lower ranks. Medvedev just regularly burns with napalm. But here’s the catch, in reality everything is completely different. So you were happy early, it’s not time yet
            1. + 12
              7 May 2024 06: 53
              It’s not entirely clear what the commentators are happy about. There was a lot of such chatter, no, this is known all over the world, as well as the fact that our main coward sometimes tries to pretend to be a macho.
              If he had silently given the order to destroy bridges across the Dnieper, as well as aqueducts and tunnels in western Ukraine, there would have been more sense than this empty chatter and impossible threats.
              1. -3
                7 May 2024 10: 08
                It is imperative to notify residents of Western countries that if the Crimean bridge is hit again, it is better for citizens of EU countries to refrain from using the Channel Tunnel, because Russia will strike at it. And if this happens, then the strike must be delivered with a hypersonic nuclear projectile. This will “hurt” the Western elite, but it is still NOT a blow to cities and bases. And as a demonstration of real readiness to strike at enemy territory, and not at our own training grounds, the action will be indispensable. It is unlikely to prompt opponents to start a full-scale nuclear war, but it will cool their ardor.
          2. +3
            7 May 2024 08: 56
            But for now these are just words. We’ll wait and see. I would really like that words and deeds do not diverge
        2. + 14
          6 May 2024 17: 28
          They really gave the French (Napoleon) and the Germans (Hitler) a hard time. But the arrogant Saxons are not really tough yet, but it’s time not only to push, but also to put them below the plinth. It is possible to wipe them off the face of the Earth as a nation and as a state, but these are dreams...
          1. -7
            7 May 2024 06: 53
            It is possible to wipe them off the face of the Earth as a nation and as a state,

            Are we publicly calling for genocide? Oh well....
            1. +1
              7 May 2024 14: 52
              Dear, aren’t the arrogant Saxons committing genocide??? How many peoples have they pitted against and destroyed both nations and states???
              Would you say there is no such thing?? Or to give you an example, our closest neighbor is Ukraine. Is this not enough for you or should you add more???
              So speak for yourself. soldier
              1. 0
                7 May 2024 16: 30
                Is this not enough for you or should you add more???

                Dear Ivan. Public calls for genocide (and this resource is a public platform), it seems like they are punishable under the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. So the prosecutor can really add something to you.
                Regardless of my personal attitude towards adversaries....
        3. +4
          6 May 2024 18: 17
          Once again we will express concern or, indeed, we will hit you in the teeth.

          Well, considering that enemies suddenly began to have various troubles suspiciously often, such as one of the largest bridges on the planet diving into the sea, explosions of elevators, regularly 2-3 times a month fires and explosions at defense factories, almost every day derailments rail trains in the USA, etc. and so on. Does this mean anything to you? If not, take a look at the statistics, how many such excesses there were before and how many there are now...
          1. +2
            6 May 2024 19: 36
            Quote: Sergey3
            If not, take a look at the statistics, how many such excesses there were before and how many there are now...

            Where can you look at it?
          2. 0
            7 May 2024 21: 35
            “No, Ivan, we are agriculture, and Chernobyl is you.”
        4. +3
          7 May 2024 09: 36
          Well said, but let's see what happens in reality:
          Exactly. If the money was returned to the country and the children of those holding power are already in the Russian Federation, then yes, everything is serious. If both the money and the children remained there, it would be a shock.
      2. +5
        6 May 2024 17: 51
        Quote: Lev_Russia
        Seriously...??? Do not joke...???

        Destroy the tunnel under the English Channel. Otherwise they will start imagining themselves to be part of Europe.
    2. +5
      6 May 2024 17: 35
      “At this point the audience is applauding, applauding, they’ve stopped applauding!” wassat wassat
      1. -3
        6 May 2024 17: 48
        Quote: Thrifty
        At this point the audience is applauding, applauding, they have finished applauding

        the last word is clearly superfluous, judging by the euphoria in the comments)
      2. +7
        6 May 2024 18: 12
        The wording “... reserves the right...” is especially striking, which for our kind “partners” implies a 99 percent guarantee of safety. I remember an old joke: - Am I right...? - You have it, you have it! - And can I...? - No you can not!!!"
    3. +3
      6 May 2024 19: 51
      Yes, this has already expressed real, vigorous concern. Not like the previous red lines. The adversaries will now certainly be seriously scared... Or not?...
    4. 0
      8 May 2024 11: 22
      If only these words were confirmed by deeds. How many times have they drawn “red lines” and at least once given their “partners” bream in response? Impunity leads to permissiveness. This is how we got to the point of supplying guns, tanks, and now long-range missiles.
      The Foreign Ministry's statement itself is immoral.
      And if these missiles are fired at the Zaporozhye or Kherson region, how will Zakharova regard this? What if in Donetsk or Lugansk?
  2. + 11
    6 May 2024 17: 04
    Now the squeal will rise to the moon, the Russians are threatening us with a vigorous blow.
  3. -6
    6 May 2024 17: 05
    In England there is now a rapid growth in sales of diapers....
  4. + 12
    6 May 2024 17: 06
    I believe that everyone has been waiting for such a statement from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs for a long time. Finally.
  5. Msi
    +3
    6 May 2024 17: 06
    The Russian Federation, in the event of the use of British-made missiles on the territory of our state, reserves the possibility of striking any military installations in Great Britain,

    And the French in France... Finally we heard... Yes
    1. + 11
      6 May 2024 17: 19
      Msi. The French Foreign Ministry responded immediately after calling the ambassador. We didn’t send anyone to Ukraine. That is, kill everyone to death, these are not state-owned French, you don’t even have to take prisoners, shoot on the spot. Brother Si brutally raped both the Frenchman and the gynecologist , you created a mess in Ukraine, China can be a mediator between you goats and Russia. Sorry for my Chinese.
      1. +8
        6 May 2024 17: 32
        Sorry for my Chinese.

        hi By the way, your Chinese is very good, even I (not being Chinese) understood everything without a translator. wink good
      2. Msi
        +1
        6 May 2024 17: 37
        Brother Xi brutally raped both the Frenchman and the gynecologist, you created a mess in Ukraine

        Let's hope that he will influence them, calm them down...
  6. +5
    6 May 2024 17: 07
    Will there be an answer for the flows?
  7. -2
    6 May 2024 17: 07
    not even three years have passed......
  8. + 16
    6 May 2024 17: 10
    Didn't their missiles fly towards us?
    1. NW
      0
      6 May 2024 17: 45
      They flew over military and civilian targets, but not over strategic ones. And they are in the “old” territories.
      1. +5
        6 May 2024 18: 40
        Does this change anything? Are military facilities non-strategic? Or is it just like holding a disco...
        1. NW
          -1
          6 May 2024 18: 53
          Are military installations non-strategic?

          Mostly no.
    2. 0
      7 May 2024 22: 30
      They are flying. And missiles and satellite systems and all of them work against “us”. But it’s as if there are those who fight, and there are those who fatten.
  9. + 24
    6 May 2024 17: 11
    When storm shadows roil the Crimea, is it not our territory? Very weak. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation - again a deuce.
    1. +5
      6 May 2024 19: 54
      For Sberbank they were not ours until last year, as for the Ministry of Foreign Affairs in behind-the-scenes conversations, who knows. But apparently strikes on Crimea do not count here. UAV strikes on the Kremlin also do not count. New concerns cannot be compared with a bunch of previous ones, but now they are real concerns.
  10. +8
    6 May 2024 17: 11
    All that remains is to make a list. English rockets are....French are....German... It might work, if it’s not just an empty shock of air.
    1. Msi
      0
      6 May 2024 17: 13
      All that remains is to make a list. English missiles are....French are....German...

      Let's start choosing objects... Yes
  11. + 13
    6 May 2024 17: 12
    Reminds me of yet another drawing of another “red line”.
    Now, if in response to the supply of British missiles to the Ukrainians, we start supplying, for example, the Houthis, Russian missiles - this is a normal, correct reaction.
    1. +4
      6 May 2024 17: 31
      Good idea. But let me ask, how do you imagine the logistics of this process? Plus, missiles need either carriers or launchers. How to deliver it?
      1. NW
        +4
        6 May 2024 17: 48
        We go to the Persians along the Caspian Sea, then they do it themselves.
        1. +1
          6 May 2024 19: 42
          Quote from N.W.
          We go to the Persians along the Caspian Sea, then they do it themselves.

          The Americans have already intercepted one ship from the Persians. Now those weapons in Donbass are shooting at us.
      2. +3
        6 May 2024 19: 47
        Quote: GO-TO-GO-TO-GO
        How can you imagine the logistics of this process?

        I have no idea. For this purpose there are specially trained people who receive full state support.
        Under Nikita Sergeevich, issues with logistics, carriers and launchers were successfully resolved. Or are people now working in the relevant structures more stupidly?
    2. +3
      6 May 2024 17: 37
      Alexander, the war waged by the Houthis is not our war. But constantly destroying all the transport routes and ports through which weapons are transported on the borders of the failed state is exactly what is needed.
      1. +6
        6 May 2024 18: 34
        Quote: bug120560
        the war waged by the Houthis is not our war.

        Yes? Maybe then you will bother to explain to the Anglo-Saxons that the war in Ukraine is none of their business? And so the Anlo-Saxons and the other six, de facto, are direct enemies of our country, but in the Kremlin corridors they categorically do not want to let this pass, so while the Houthis are doing bad things to our enemies, we must do everything possible to make it even worse for these enemies.
      2. +1
        6 May 2024 19: 49
        Quote: bug120560
        the war waged by the Houthis is not our war

        But the enemy of my enemy is at least my fellow traveler. And it is worth sharing supplies with him.
  12. + 18
    6 May 2024 17: 14
    The Russian Foreign Ministry threatened to attack British targets if British missiles were used to strike Russian territory
    I apologize, but are the territories of the Kherson and Zaporozhye regions of the DPR, LPR and Crimea the territory of Russia?!! feel
    1. +4
      6 May 2024 17: 39
      Quote: Vasilenko Vladimir
      I apologize, but are the territories of the Kherson and Zaporozhye regions of the DPR, LPR and Crimea the territory of Russia?!!

      Well, how should I tell you?
      1. +3
        6 May 2024 17: 46
        Quote: ettore
        Well, how should I tell you?

        well as it is
        it’s like in that joke, you’re either a doctor there or there, otherwise it annoys me
        1. 0
          8 May 2024 19: 13
          Quote: Vasilenko Vladimir
          well as it is

          A phrase from the film fits here. “His Excellency’s adjutant”: “You see Yura...”
    2. +4
      7 May 2024 01: 22
      Apparently not for Lavrov. It’s like Russia, but it’s like, second class or something. You can hit it with anything, the plebs live there... But first-class Russia, and even more so top-class Moscow, this is completely different
  13. +9
    6 May 2024 17: 15
    including outside Ukraine

    A ship delivering military cargo fits well into this formulation.
    1. +7
      6 May 2024 19: 03
      It's better not to touch the vessels. The amers have the most powerful fleet, and if our tankers with the oil of our oligarchs begin to sink, there will be trouble (including environmental problems). We are vulnerable with our export goods. Oil pipelines, gas pipelines...only firewood is not yet transported over the hill through pipes. In Turkey, in a couple of years, they will choose some kind of “sub-mattress”, and the next stream will grunt (blue or Turkish). Instead of developing our economy based on cheap energy resources, we are still selling everything. Our bosses and deputies will never understand that their resources are a huge competitive advantage.
      1. +2
        6 May 2024 19: 51
        Quote: ergh081
        It's better not to touch the vessels.

        It depends on what the ships are with. A ship with weapons from the Persians was intercepted by the Houthis. During the Cuban Missile Crisis, ships carrying missiles for Cuba were stopped. All tankers are defenseless, but we also have a submarine fleet. They don’t allow us to stop ships for inspection, which means we will beat them without inspection, based on intelligence tips. Let them then figure out why the missiles were transported under the flag of Panama.
      2. +1
        6 May 2024 19: 56
        all bosses understand. they have no goal to compete, their goal is to serve for a small share of what is sold to the owners
  14. +1
    6 May 2024 17: 16
    The Ambassador was told that the Russian side views D. Cameron’s words as evidence of a serious escalation and confirmation of London’s increasing involvement in military operations on the side of Kyiv

    - emphasized in the official statement of the Russian Foreign Ministry.
    Actually, this is what official London is trying to achieve, not to mention the activities of unofficial London, especially in the Ukrainian region, including on the territory of the Republic of Moldova, together with its Israeli colleagues.
  15. BAI
    + 10
    6 May 2024 17: 18
    I have some doubts about the answer. Families of diplomats are not evacuated
    1. 0
      8 May 2024 08: 25
      They will be offered to die for Russia...
  16. +7
    6 May 2024 17: 19
    another red line? war with NATO? and why don't I believe?
    1. +1
      6 May 2024 19: 58
      war is unlikely to be avoided, but rather here NATO will draw a red line that our wise leaders will not be able (and fortunately) not to cross after several attempts rejected by their adversaries for another agreement dear to their hearts and wallets
    2. 0
      7 May 2024 22: 45
      Rather, it’s not a “red line”, but another “last Chinese warning”, against which the entire foreign fraternity has already developed immunity. winked
    3. 0
      8 May 2024 08: 26
      Well, probably because you didn’t believe that Putin would start the SVO.
  17. +3
    6 May 2024 17: 21
    It's high time to stop the Englishwoman from taking shit.
  18. +6
    6 May 2024 17: 21
    Quote: Vasilenko Vladimir
    The Russian Foreign Ministry threatened to attack British targets if British missiles were used to strike Russian territory
    I apologize, but are the territories of the Kherson and Zaporozhye regions of the DPR, LPR and Crimea the territory of Russia?!! feel

    Judging by this statement, no... But this once again shows what our Foreign Ministry is worth.
    And what are his “statements” worth?
    1. +1
      6 May 2024 17: 44
      Quote: acetophenon
      Judging by this statement, no... But this once again shows what our Foreign Ministry is worth.
      And what are his “statements” worth?

      The Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs is headed by the Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation (hereinafter referred to as the Minister), appointed and dismissed by the President of the Russian Federation on the proposal of the Chairman of the Government of the Russian Federation.
    2. +1
      7 May 2024 01: 37
      Are there still people who have not understood in recent years what our Foreign Ministry is worth?))
  19. +8
    6 May 2024 17: 23
    Here it is, what the bureaucracy is doing! It’s been almost a year since British missiles have been fired at Crimea, and finally the Ministry of Foreign Affairs issued the order... After a long, so to speak, formulation. A little late...
  20. +2
    6 May 2024 17: 24
    Earlier, British Foreign Secretary David Cameron said

    Let him hide his dissatisfied face and take an example from neutral China, India, Turkey and the rest.
  21. +5
    6 May 2024 17: 24
    Vladimir Vladimirovich, let’s walk over the rock on the Rockall Bank, anyway, it is not English according to international maritime law.
  22. +8
    6 May 2024 17: 31
    Well, you can say anything, paper will tolerate anything. Just remember Putin’s famous speech on February 24, 2022. A lot of terrible things were said, and everyone thought, well, finally, they showed their teeth... But years passed, so what? And absolutely nothing of what was said was fulfilled. The guarantor was afraid. The words remain just words
  23. +5
    6 May 2024 17: 32
    Thus, Russia expresses its readiness to take radical retaliatory measures in the event of the use of British long-range missiles against Russian targets. It is time for the UK authorities to understand that such actions on the part of London will lead to the risk of a major escalation in Europe, including a direct military conflict between Russia and the countries of the North Atlantic Alliance.

    From diplomatic translation into Russian, in my interpretation:

    Please don't shoot at the "old" territories, but at all the others, including Crimea, as much as you like. A serious move, nothing to say.
  24. +6
    6 May 2024 17: 32
    Yeah, our Masha hasn’t said much over the years. I do not believe! I remember the statement of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs almost two years ago “they will not be happy”...
    1. -2
      6 May 2024 18: 00
      The dates have not been announced. So we wait.
      1. 0
        7 May 2024 22: 50
        They forgot to include an emoticon with a smile, so they took your “memorandum” for the direct meaning and did not understand the humor. laughing
  25. +6
    6 May 2024 17: 32
    Was anyone responsible for the gas pipeline explosion?
    1. 0
      7 May 2024 22: 57
      How did they “not answer”? And how many memoranda there were in response to sabotage! We haven't started yet! We'll show you! We are not like that! I can’t count how many concerns there were! sad
  26. +1
    6 May 2024 17: 36
    If, of course, you believe the article, then in the statement of our Foreign Ministry - “....the possibility of striking any military targets in Great Britain...” - there is no talk about the “possibility of striking” Britain. At best, at British facilities somewhere in Syria or Africa. And that is very doubtful. There are plenty of facilities in Britain and on the Black Sea coast.
  27. +2
    6 May 2024 17: 37
    The Russian Federation in the event of the use of British-made missiles on the territory of our state reserves the possibility of striking on any military installations in Great Britain, including outside Ukraine.

    We are experts at reserving opportunities, but using them is difficult.
    1. 0
      7 May 2024 22: 59
      Exactly! As that kebab-maker from “Prisoner of the Caucasus” said: “So let’s drink to ensure that our desires coincide with our capabilities!” laughing
  28. +4
    6 May 2024 17: 39
    We need to work more closely with our allies. Cuba's debts have been written off, but where is our base in Cuba? Or, for example, with Yemen, an agreement on military-technical cooperation has not yet been signed. The fact that Britain was warned is correct, they don’t understand otherwise, it’s just blow after blow, terrorist attack after terrorist attack.
  29. +3
    6 May 2024 17: 40
    I hope the same conditions apply to the use of British BEC for attacks on our ships in the territorial waters of the Russian Federation and on the Crimean Bridge.
  30. + 16
    6 May 2024 17: 41
    Let's try to sort out this chaotic set of red lines and complaints.
    1) Let’s assume that the government of the Russian Federation and its Ministry of Foreign Affairs are not on the planet Nibiru, but are really the government of the Russian Federation. Then they must be guided by the Constitution of the Russian Federation, according to which both Crimea and the territory of 4 new subjects are Russia. But then the question arises, why all these statements if British missiles have long been quietly used to attack Russian territory and no one has seen any consequences from this?
    2) It turns out that the Russian government actually considers only what is within the 1991 borders to be Russian territory. Great, but why then is this MFA not in prison yet? Because there is a clear criminal offense here. And then British weapons have long been used to attack the "old" Russian Federation, which the Russian government also helpfully told us. Only these are not missiles, but UAVs. So missiles are not allowed, but UAVs are? Then we need to give the British a list of what can be used and what cannot.
    3) If the Russian Foreign Ministry considers it to be the territory of only the 1991 border, then it is unclear why they are generally dissatisfied? The logic of the British is simple - the Russian Federation committed aggression against a sovereign country, we are supplying weapons to defend against the invaders. The victim of aggression can use it at his own discretion.
    If the Russian Foreign Ministry recognizes the 1991 borders, then it turns out that they are unhappy with the fact that Ukraine is defending itself from aggression.
    P/S I am saying this because any statement in politics should be at least logical and consistent. All the chaos that has been issued and emanating from the Russian authorities for the last two years only contributes to ever greater demands and ever greater escalation.
  31. -1
    6 May 2024 17: 42
    Well, what the heck, it’s spring, we’ve woken up from hibernation.
  32. +3
    6 May 2024 17: 43
    Well, let's see what the actions of the Russian Federation and the Britons and others will be! The main thing is that these are not empty glory!
  33. +5
    6 May 2024 17: 52
    You can test American missiles with American missiles, but not small British missiles! Strange logic. You also provide us with US databases!!
  34. -2
    6 May 2024 17: 54
    Faberge was heated, heated up and went to harden? Or they will cool down again in the wind.
  35. +4
    6 May 2024 17: 56
    After Cameron's statement, the British Embassy should be barn locked. The arrogant Saxons must be driven out of Moscow.

    What are we waiting for?

    Otherwise you won't be able to reason with them.
    1. 0
      7 May 2024 23: 06
      Heh, spit in their eyes, they will wipe themselves and say: “Like, God’s dew!” sad
  36. 0
    6 May 2024 18: 01
    Probably there Poseidon already lay down on the ground abeam the Tower.
  37. 0
    6 May 2024 18: 02
    This is right. Iran was not a sucker, it attacked Israel
  38. +4
    6 May 2024 18: 05
    The main thing is that the words of the Russian Foreign Ministry are supported by deeds!
  39. 0
    6 May 2024 18: 12
    The creatures... They're begging for a nuclear strike
  40. -2
    6 May 2024 18: 21
    Wagging your tongue is not the right thing to do wassat
  41. +1
    6 May 2024 18: 21
    Why don't we scrape together 200-250 Iskanders, supersonic or hypersonic aircraft missiles with conventional warheads weighing 500 kg each, and strike at the energy generation facilities, military factories and bases of the Brits. The whole world will thank us - for the fact that WE took revenge on the Anglo-Saxons for the murder of hundreds of millions of inhabitants of the Earth, which they committed in the 14th-20th centuries. The rest of the mongrels, and the Germans and the French will keep their tails between their legs, especially since the latter remember that the Brits shaved them too. If someone thinks this is not enough - I think there is gunpowder in the powder flasks, we will add.
  42. +3
    6 May 2024 18: 24
    Seven Vampire MLRS shells were destroyed over the Belgorod region, the Ministry of Defense reported.
  43. The comment was deleted.
  44. +1
    6 May 2024 18: 37
    ..Thus, Russia expresses its readiness for radical retaliatory measures in the event of the use of British long-range missiles against Russian targets
    Finally, specifics instead of vague back and forth!
    Just what about the American Atakms? Where's the threat to hit mattress military targets, huh?
  45. K_4
    +3
    6 May 2024 18: 40
    Maybe we’ll stop shaking the air, but let’s silently first restore order within ourselves. We’ll take care of the embezzlers there, put things in order with the lumps, and if not a day comes new news about “stabbed, killed, raped,” we’ll go through the Moscow Region with such a good rake, we’ll bring the bankers to their senses, and we’ll cut down on the monopolists’ desires. But this is all wrong, not patriotic, the main thing is to yell “the whole world is in ruins”...well...well. Will we live on Mars later?
  46. +2
    6 May 2024 18: 47
    The statement is correct, but it turns out to be another red line. Considering the previous, I am afraid that this will happen.
    1. +1
      6 May 2024 18: 53
      At the moment there is no statement from the Russian MFA in the Western press! in Washington Post, Bloomberg! Maybe there will be one later!
      1. +4
        7 May 2024 07: 09
        these statements are for the domestic market so to speak
  47. +1
    6 May 2024 19: 08
    We need to close the embassies in London, Paris (and further on the list), then we’ll see. Then, together with this statement, this will be the first call. For now it's just rhetoric
  48. +5
    6 May 2024 19: 18
    Are we really going to bomb the embassy in Kueva or the Khan of Gibraltar? And before that, the same shadow storms at the same Black Sea Fleet headquarters, is that true, were there any seeds?
  49. +5
    6 May 2024 19: 19
    Words, words. Let's see what happens in reality...
  50. +8
    6 May 2024 19: 43
    This has been used for a long time. And not just British-made. Or is Crimea not Russian territory?!
  51. 0
    6 May 2024 20: 00
    Well, it finally dawned on me that without using it, but constantly scolding and pointing out about the lines, it’s starting to get boring, and even with casualties, it’s time to hit the territory from which these weapons are supplied
  52. +1
    6 May 2024 20: 14
    And if necessary, crack it so that it takes on diarrhea!!!!
  53. +2
    6 May 2024 23: 32
    The Russian Foreign Ministry threatened to attack British targets if British missiles were used to strike Russian territory

    The entire territory of Russia or only that which is recognized by the so-called “world community”?
  54. +1
    7 May 2024 00: 42
    What objects will we hit? In the Falklands?
  55. +4
    7 May 2024 05: 55
    Ooty bose my. Grrrr. To the world.™ We're in heaven, and they'll just die.™ Well, we'll see. To what extent does puffing out one's cheeks correspond to specific actions? My mood, however, is somewhat skeptical. Against the background of objective reality, painted with red felt-tip pens.
    1. +5
      7 May 2024 06: 06
      You can throw stones, but this kind of rhetoric from our foreign policy department, personally, has long made me sick. Against the backdrop of regular attacks on the Belgorod region, what happened to Dasha Dugina and Vladlen, the extraction of the Azov rabble to Turkey, the theft of assets, the explosion of the Nord Stream and other obscenities that were safely released on the brakes. The list goes on.
      1. +1
        7 May 2024 08: 53
        What kind of rhetoric should our Foreign Ministry have in your opinion?
        The Ministry of Foreign Affairs has never warned the opposing parties in an OFFICIAL manner....
        1. 0
          7 May 2024 14: 44
          Our Foreign Ministry, in my opinion, should have the following rhetoric: they took some action (for example, hit Bankova) and then officially announced that this action was a direct response to such and such actions of Kyiv. Or they eliminated some high-ranking GUR officer, they announced. Liquidated due to direct involvement in this and that. That's what I'd like to hear. Added to the list of terrorists and extremists? So catch and judge. Do not mark the surname in the media with an asterisk *. He doesn’t really care about these stars of theirs from the high bell tower.
      2. -1
        7 May 2024 21: 49
        I do not approve of terrorism, God forbid, but I feel less sorry for Dasha Dugin than for any deceased Belgorod citizen, or indeed for any civilian who died in this conflict.
  56. +3
    7 May 2024 07: 09
    what a storm has arisen, did you seriously believe in another red curb?)) that is, when earlier the same Ministry of Foreign Affairs said that the appearance of artillery was a red line and there would be a response for this, you didn’t believe? and when the missiles were transferred is also not that?) the shadow storm in Lugansk is not yet a coat, but in the Crimea? The usual show-off like in poker and that’s all, especially since we don’t need ambassadors for any kind of demarches, we have a special representative Abramovich, he is always in the know and always conveys all the messages directly, it’s just an inauguration, just an advertisement, Dyumin and his subsequent possible rearrangements are interesting, I’m in them myself I don’t really believe it, but I was born like that and it’s all empty, comrades, now Xi will still support the limpiski pirimiriya and we’ll see
  57. 0
    7 May 2024 09: 23
  58. kvv
    -1
    7 May 2024 09: 33
    Well, at least this way, I hope that this is not just another red line, although Czech vampires bombard the Belgorod region every day with casualties and destruction and nothing, not even a seedy note from the Ministry of Concerns
  59. +1
    7 May 2024 10: 32
    Leaves behind the possibility... So what?
  60. 0
    7 May 2024 11: 58
    War with NATO? 100% "thin" to everyone.
    But if ours calculated that no one would “fit in” with the islanders, well, the General Staff probably developed the plan a long time ago. It feels like they are asking for it, despite the fact that British weapons have long been used against us. Why is this said only now?
    I think we can include the leaders of Moldova, Poland, the Baltic states, and the European Union in this series of obvious ones. Embassies must be withdrawn from these countries. These are obvious enemies who will always spoil things for us. Now they need to be opposed only by force. They won't understand anything else.
    1. 0
      7 May 2024 23: 15
      To counteract force, you need to properly gather yourself with it. It seems that two years was not enough for this, and history may not provide additional periods. winked
  61. 0
    7 May 2024 12: 53
    It's high time... Even though I currently live in Germany, I am ready to help Russia. Beat these creatures from the inside
  62. +1
    7 May 2024 15: 02
    Another red line. All the steam will go into the whistle again. Our “partners” understand this well and are becoming more and more impudent. And their hand will not waver to strike with nuclear weapons first. Because they know there will be no response. There will be no one and nothing to do. It's late because...
  63. +1
    7 May 2024 20: 35
    Fresh addition, but hard to believe. Was the red pencil shown to the ambassador from afar?
  64. +1
    7 May 2024 20: 49
    Yes, but this is a Great War. You understand that in this case there are no options at all. Are you ready to burn down the globe because of the idiots from Bankovskaya who do not want to give up in time and admit defeat (at the same time having emigrated from Ukraine, fortunately there is still time for this)? Isn't the price too high?
  65. 0
    7 May 2024 22: 25
    Yeah, another blah blah blah, who will they attack there? Their children, who hid in London and Paris from mobilization. I don't believe a single word. The British probably broke their stomachs laughing. Who will be the rocket and strike at what was honestly stolen from the Russian people?
  66. 0
    8 May 2024 00: 22
    Come on? seriously? And what arrived at the Black Sea Fleet Headquarters via the GCC? Isn’t this the territory of Russia?))) Sberbank won’t let you lie)))
  67. 0
    8 May 2024 02: 16
    Ojalá cumplan lo que dicen y no pase como con las ridículas "líneas rojas"
  68. 0
    8 May 2024 03: 11
    The Foreign Ministry promised a “mirror response”...
    So, a strange word appeared on the wall of the embassy: “Yyx”.
  69. 0
    8 May 2024 06: 12
    It would be better if they hit me first, and then at least the entire Ministry of Foreign Affairs dealt with explanations. These Anglo-Saxons are an eternal problem and therefore it is useless to stand on ceremony with them.
  70. 0
    8 May 2024 07: 05
    Well, if the MFA itself has already started threatening, then for sure... they will hit... or they will again release an alcoholic in a telegram with an angry speech in letters on the screen. But in fact... it is better to remain silent than to shake the air... one already threatened something like that 2 years ago... about inevitability... and? did they hit hard? or do we only walk straight along the map with brown?
    Where will they “hit”??? They have children, grandchildren, property there.. it will most likely be like in the joke about Voronezh....
  71. 0
    8 May 2024 08: 38
    The easiest option is to damage their optical fiber cables, fortunately “Losharik” is back in service, but the most painful option is to destroy their SSBNs on combat patrol: the ends are in the water both here and there; I am silent about the attack on the Clyde naval base at the same time.
  72. 0
    8 May 2024 14: 17
    What does "UK sites" mean? For example, can someone’s Rolls-Royce in Russia be considered a British object?
  73. 0
    14 May 2024 02: 07
    Our Foreign Ministry is a talking shop, there are a lot of words, but no action. I'm judging by the outskirts, which prevents me from erasing the 100k grouping. near Belarus, about crossings, bridges, etc. without sadness.