Damage to Western civilization: who is to blame?

105
Immanuel Kant is undoubtedly to blame. In The Critique of the Practical Mind, he taught that happiness is "such a state of rational being in the world when everything in its existence goes according to his will and desire." In order not to interfere with the achievement of a happy state, each person (rational being) should behave in accordance with the maxim: “Do so that you always treat humanity both in your person and in the person of everyone else as a goal and never treat only to him as a means. ” Finally: “Act so that the maxim of your will can at the same time have the force of the principle of universal legislation.”

Known criticism of the Kantian ethical principle by Herbert Spencer. The latter did not consider Kant's absolutes acceptable. Moreover, he declared such an ethic harmful. According to Spencer, Kant substituted altruism with the opposite — egoism: “... what then can keep us from the intended course of conduct? Consciousness that the result of it, if such behavior became universal, could become harmful for the person himself: he may not find help when he needs it. So, firstly, the issue should be resolved by examining the likely results of a particular mode of behavior, and secondly, this result is happiness or unhappiness for the individual. Is it not strange that the principle, praised by virtue of the altruism supposedly contained in it, ends up being justified in selfishness? ”(See for more information: Spencer G. Experiences are scientific, political and philosophical. Minsk: Modern writer, 1998. C .1135-1137).

Spencer explains that the offended man is ready to kill his abuser. Following the Kantian prescriptions, this person assumes that all people who have been insulted could take up the murder of their offenders. What can keep a potential killer from the temptation to go and get revenge? Obviously, Spencer responds, "a representation of the enormity of evil, suffering, deprivation of happiness, which would have been caused by this." But if you think about the advice of Kant, then it’s just easy to imagine the killing of offenders as a universal matter and leading to total happiness: after all, in this case, the “amount of happiness” in the world will start to increase rapidly. All who kill the offenders should be made happy. Moreover, they will deduce from this law!

Richard Dawkins wrote about Kant's imperative: “The imperative works wonderfully, for example, in the case of deception. Imagine a world in which people lie from a principle where a lie is considered a good and laudable norm of behavior. In such a world, a lie would lose all meaning. A presumption of truth is required for the very definition of a lie. If the moral principle is a rule that we want to make common to all people, then a lie cannot serve as a moral principle, because then it will become meaningless. Lying as a life rule is internally unstable. To sum up: egoism, or parasitism on others, can work and bring me benefit only in a society where my behavior is the exception to the rule. But I don’t want everyone to accept egoism and parasitism as a moral principle for themselves, if only because I willn’t be parasitic then. ” (See: Dawkins, R. God as an illusion. M .: Kolibri, 2008. S. 326-327). Dawkins thus proves the inadequacy of Kant’s "absolute" ethics by the law of the unity and struggle of opposites. A lie devoid of opposites dissolves in itself, and the lucky man who discovered a convenient way to live does not want to share this way with others. Not enough for everyone ...

Official parasites cannot exist without a people who are robbed: taxes, bribes, kickbacks, small “gifts” and offerings. This is typical both for Western countries and for Russia: in essence, there is absolutely no difference. Social evolution makes everyone adapt in one manner. If in Russia, a deputy’s place in the Duma is openly bought, and many warm places are occupied by friends and relatives of high-ranking officials, then in the USA Obama is openly trades ambassadorial posts (the price of “sponsorship” started during the election campaign varies between 2 and 6 millions of dollars; a place in France costs three times more than a diplomatic post in foggy Albion. 30% of ambassadors’s vacancies go to Obama's friends and sponsors, but not career diplomats). In some Afghanistan, which has followed the example of the United States, almost everything is openly bought right up to the school tests (corruption has always been there, but its monstrous rampant occurred under the influence of the West: more than two thirds of the population, according to recent survey, now approves bribes to officials; three years ago such approvals were only 42%).

Nevertheless, it comes to the fact that officials treat representatives of the "people" as "bydlu." Russian officials have an ordinary human contempt for those who despise them, feed and water them, put them on in fur coats, and charge Mercedes with gas flashes with flashing lights. In the West, in some Britain, the parliamentary party organizer (by status - the minister) can face a policeman as a plebeian and impose three-story “facs” on them. It seems, give officials the will - they simply destroy the people. Courts, prisons, insults, extortion, “raids”, “juvenile justice”. But you never know! Ways - darkness: after all, officials have the power and monopoly on violence. Only the one who made his way to the officials is capable of eliminating the threat of officials, that is, he successfully separated from the people and entered the fight at the highest evolutionary level. Marx characterized the similar position of the state and people with the phrase “on opposite sides of the barricades”.

There are two points here. First: the rulers act in their circle exactly according to Kant's maxims, turning their actions into law. On the one hand, this law blesses the officials, on the other - gives them the opportunity to continue to parasitize on the people, but only on the condition that at the very least, they allow the people to survive. Otherwise, their feeder will be covered with a copper basin.

The second point: democracy in modern political systems is no different than the management of a minority by a majority. The most adjusted minority with pleasure controls the least adapted majority. Judge for yourself: for example, two thirds of the registered electorate is going to vote for presidential candidates. Besides the fact that not one hundred percent is going on, not the entire population participates in the elections, but only those people who have the right to vote. 142 million people live in Russia, but about 110 million people could participate in the last election. And on the plots arrived only 71 million. Of these, only 45 with more than million voted for V. V. Putin. The very election of the 142 president by the millions in the 45-million country already speaks about the power of the minority. Exactly the same thing happens in Western countries. You shouldn’t shout about the primordially our autocracies, totalitarianism, “Sovdepiâ”, suppression of the opposition, etc., and so on. Everywhere and always - the same picture.

However, there is one curious difference between Western countries and Russia, caused no longer by the desire of the authorities for Western-style democracy (quite to the ancient Greek: many lords still dream of slaves), but by the very Kantian interpretation of absolute morality, in which a reasonable being wants to achieve states, "when everything ... goes according to his will and desire." This is the very principle of extreme egoism and individualism, which has been implanted with great difficulty for a quarter of a century already in Russia and in the CIS, and which has reached unprecedented heights in the advanced West. From these very heights the West has yet to fall. It will be very painful!

Nothing confirms the definition of democracy as the power of a minority, as new laws, very often adopted in the "tolerant" West.

Sergey Gavrilets, scientific director of the National Institute for Mathematical and Biological Synthesis at the University of Tennessee, explored reasons for the existence of same-sex love. The scientist built a mathematical model that showed that the solution to homosexuality may lie not in the genes themselves, but in the biochemical compounds and processes that control the gene activity, turning on or off the DNA components.

In some cases, children can receive from parents of the opposite sex - daughters from fathers, sons from mothers - epigenetic marks that promote the development of nontraditional sexual orientation. The ability to save tags in one and several generations has previously been experimentally confirmed in animals.

Mathematics allowed Gavrilc to confirm that the hypothesis really explains the preservation of a small homosexual stratum among the heterosexual majority.

What does this “small homosexual stratum” do in the name of attaining Kantian happiness (in other words, the values ​​of liberalism)? By uniting and jointly defending their interests, they get the possibility of a huge influence on politics. The will of the majority does not interest them at all. They care about their own happiness. A presidential candidate (for example, Hollande in France or Obama in the USA) is well aware that five or seven percent of the population are gay and lesbian, and many of them have a fairly active political stance. Their voices can not be ignored. Therefore, Obama comes to the Pentagon for the gay holiday and speaks out in public for same-sex marriage, and Hollande makes a statement about the legalization of gay marriage as one of the central points of his election program, the implementation of which immediately begins after victory. So the minority rules the majority, at the same time gaining its happiness and despising the people who are powerless to change anything. Parliament and the people have nothing in common.

In early February, the French National Assembly voted to give homosexual couples the right to marry and adopt children. Deputies passed the law 249 votes. 97 people were opposed. This supposedly expresses the “will of the people”: suddenly the minority suddenly acquired the appearance of a majority.

In parallel, the same thing happened in Britain. On February 5, the House of Commons of the Parliament of the United Kingdom voted in favor of the same-sex marriage bill. 400 parliamentarians were in favor of changing the current legislation, and 175 was against it.

In France, a discussion of that part of the gay document, which says about adoption, is going on. At the end of February there will be a vote on this issue. That's freedom, freedom, happiness, happiness. Well, and this: "Act so that the maxim of your will could at the same time have the force of the principle of universal legislation." And the will of homosexuals becomes the cornerstone of the law. The nouns “mom” and “dad” are a thing of the past, and their replacement is the faceless “parent No. 1” and “parent No. XXUMX.”

In the progressive kindergartens of some Sweden, they experimentally teach children to say “it” instead of “he” and “she”. Boys are recommended to play Barbie, and girls are recommended to play bullet from plastic machines. So as not to take root “false” gender stereotypes. A girl should not grow up as a cook, and a boy should be a “brutal macho” like comrade Putin. Let the boys become more feminine, and the girls more belligerent. In Germany, children's comics preach blue love: Dad divorced his mother and began to live with another man. The plot ends with the fact that this dad's son, a schoolboy of ten, kisses a classmate.

If the officials understand that it is impossible to destroy the people, because then the man who can feed two generals will completely disappear, then the minority of the public is not concerned about the survival of the nation. The ultimate egoism here completely holds the spirit and dictates the rules of behavior that in the very near future - exactly with Kant's imperative - can disintegrate society to its very foundation and eventually destroy the whole civilization. The path from the minority to the majority is not so long: with the aging of Western civilization and the fact that in Europe and the USA it is considered unprofitable to “invest” in the birth of children, homosexuality is another curved path to elementary extinction.

The West faced a paradox - and found itself at an impasse. Defending democratic "freedoms" and "values" and fighting for individual "happiness", Western civilization buries itself. Probably Patrick Buchanan is right, believing that the 80-90 years remain of Western civilization. By the end of the century it will not. And the process can be accelerated if homopairs with the permission of the state (the power of a minority) are engaged in the adoption and upbringing of children. It is easy to assume that these children will grow!

In Russia, everything is the opposite. Today we see a departure from the former blind copying of Western liberalism, which began with a perestroika love for the Coca-Cola and the American flag. It’s not for nothing that the West is sounding the alarm: after all, the State Duma approved in the first reading a bill that would ban propaganda of same-sex love. This gave Kerstin Holm from Frankfurter Allgemeine a reason to write Article about the "blue" harassment in Russia. A German journalist reports that the opposition magazine "The New Times" conducted a survey in which eminent cultural figures gave advice to young people with "unconventional orientation." Director Kirill Serebrennikov advised young gays and lesbians to leave the country, and actress Renata Litvinova said: “The time will come when, going against all, but having saved yourself, you will be right. This wish is strong. I do not know how much suffering and humiliation you endure, but the obsession with a loner is stronger than even death. ”

As for the adoption of Russian children in the West, the State Duma is also engaged in this issue. Russia may revise the adoption agreement with France, if Paris legalizes same-sex marriage. About it in Paris said State Duma Chairman Sergei Naryshkin. The possibility of the adoption by the French side of a draft law on the adoption of children by the “gays” will be taken into account by Russia. Our children will not go to same-sex families.

Recently, Ivan Blo, deputy head of the French Ministry of the Interior, professor of sociology and, by the way, an election specialist, in an interview "Voice of Russia" presented his view on the coming disintegration of the West and on the spiritual role of Russia in the future world order.

Blo believes that the recognition of the right of homosexual couples to marry caused outrage of a significant part of the French people, which is absolutely not satisfied with this variant of the evolution of civilization. But the fact is that no one asks anything for these people.

“Oddly enough, those who shout about human rights, as a rule, never turn to the people in order to learn their opinion. So it can be considered that a policy in the name of so-called human rights can be deeply anti-democratic, because it is inspired by people with an ideology that they wish to forcibly instill in society. This is what we see today often in the West! ”


The dominance of the minority over the majority in the West is expressed, according to the views of the scientist, in the good organization of the former, with its complete absence. This was what General de Gaulle said after the war when he accused the Fourth Republic of being a regime in the service of a minority. Blo continues:

“This morning I read an article testifying to Western hypocrisy. This is an article by the newspaper Le Figaro, which says that the Russian Duma is a parliament serving the interests of President Putin. It says that it is scandalous and contrary to the foundations of democracy! I note that the criticism of Le Figaro should be extended to the French parliament. Since this parliament, as well as all other weighted average parliaments, follows the course of the government. There is a majority in parliament, which by definition is supposed to support the government. What can and is contrary to the division of power into separate branches, which is written in the Declaration of Human Rights. But this article is not respected. So one of two things must choose one: either we should not recognize the division of power into different types as a fundamental condition for the observance of human rights, or we plunge into total hypocrisy. So it’s absolutely pointless to brand Russia! ”


Ivan Blo concludes that the West is infected with a moral crisis. The sociologist finds the ideal for the future society in the Christian image of St. George the Victorious striking the dragon. The Frenchman saw him on the emblem of Moscow and gave him the following original characteristic:

"A clever man sits on a horse, representing his emotional impulses, which he uses to defeat the dragon, that is, his basest instincts."


Here is the foundation of a strong society. But in Europe, the opposite is true. Today, speaking of the spoiled Western civilization and comparing its decline with the fall of Ancient Rome, the Western representatives themselves say with sadness not about victory "over baser instincts", but about the indulgence of the very minority that now sets the tone for democracy. For "everything in his existence goes according to his will and desire."
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

105 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +6
    14 February 2013 08: 36
    NATO is weakening, cannot but rejoice
    1. +25
      14 February 2013 08: 45
      This German told the Wehrmacht veteran that he was ashamed to stand next to him, the veteran did not say anything in response, but simply .......... laughing
      1. lechatormosis
        +12
        14 February 2013 08: 51
        MUZHIK and gay - incompatible concepts smile smile
      2. +10
        14 February 2013 08: 58
        Quote: Alexander Romanov
        This German told the Wehrmacht veteran that he was ashamed to stand next to him, the veteran did not say anything in response, but simply
        Fu Sanya how unethical. You are in decent society feel .
        1. +5
          14 February 2013 09: 04
          Quote: Mechanic
          You are in decent society

          Yes, I'm in Russia, where the society is decent, on a decent Russian site. But we are talking about Western "civilization" and "culture." Every decent person in Russia should know what Western "civilization" is.
          Fu, tired of putting quotes with this west.
          Hi Zhenya wink
          1. +10
            14 February 2013 09: 39
            Quote: Alexander Romanov
            Fu, tired of putting quotes with this west.

            Sasha, quotes are not necessary, just write -WEST, and all questions are removed hi
          2. 0
            14 February 2013 10: 31
            Quote: Alexander Romanov
            "culture"

            from this one definitely wants to grab the gun
            here is their whole cult-culture
      3. Hon
        0
        14 February 2013 12: 45
        It’s interesting, but in Germany there are times when veterans are killed because of awards and pensions?
      4. +2
        14 February 2013 14: 57
        and what veterans of the Wehrmacht dear people ..... yab they two put these sticks
        1. +7
          14 February 2013 19: 38
          Our grandfathers completely clarified the issue. It seemed to nobody a little, info 100%! And rule them - you must first be no weaker than them. With a bunch of grenades under the caterpillar, be ready to jump, say.
          And secondly ... The enemy should be chosen according to their strength, age and armament. Well, we are not foul Americans, forgive me, God, it’s not true to rush at the old man.
      5. MG42
        +10
        14 February 2013 16: 17
        Wehrmacht veterans in the war themselves inserted sticks.

        I remembered a case, a friend told a veteran with a stick crossing the road on a zebra-major major turns from the main >>> make way signal to grandfather let him pass, grandfather stopped in front of the car, he honks further and shouts obscenely >>> grandfather gave him a stick on the hood without long hesitation. The major flew out shouting at his grandfather, the men walked by calmed down = the grandfather proudly crossed the road, and the major lesson >>> will not become poorer, however.
      6. +11
        14 February 2013 16: 38
        Plyusanul from the heart - just the other day, I was discussing with the missus that I really did not want to explain to my child when he would start asking questions why his uncle kisses his uncle, or his aunt and aunt.
        No matter what anyone says, they can never coexist peacefully buggers gay people and normal families.
    2. -4
      14 February 2013 09: 10
      The author, learn the theory of state and law, before writing this, we went:

      Parasitic officials cannot exist without a people who are robbed: taxes, bribes, kickbacks, small “gifts” and offerings


      1. The official acts within the framework of the current legislation, and takes the official rent for the implementation or circumvention of the laws adopted by the State Duma.
      2. Laws are adopted by the ruling class, namely, capitalists, businessmen (swindlers) of all stripes, ALL elected bodies from a rural settlement to the Federation Council are composed of businessmen a little less than completely.
      3. Laws The ruling class writes for itself, and blame for entrepreneurial A fraudulent habit adds up to performers.

      Russia is openly buying a deputy’s place in “thoughts”, and many of the warm spots are held by friends and relatives of senior officials


      1. Businessmen are again buying seats in the Duma in order to legitimize the stolen property and capital.
      2. No one will even take a person from the street as a watchman in the cemetery.

      Of these, only more than 45 million voted for V.V. Putin.


      1. What prevented come and vote ?! A log in the eye ?!

      The French National Assembly voted to give homosexual couples the right to marry and adopt children.


      there are three topics on the zone - food, game and roosters.

      public opinion should always be something busy with roosters, officials, adoption in the United States, but not the foundation of the state, its dominant huckster class.
      1. +23
        14 February 2013 09: 36
        Quote: Civil
        public opinion should always be something busy with roosters, officials, adoption in the United States, but not the foundation of the state, its dominant huckster class


        But I, as a layman, are less concerned about hucksters in power, but licking piderasts on the street when a 10-year-old child goes and asks dad and how can it really be? What should he answer? or social patronage?
        Or how many of the revolutionaries shout a lot about the dangers of power, but in the end they can’t offer anything, but it’s great to shout, especially for grandmas — well, there are different funds, donations, membership fees. As far as I know, when choosing the opposition’s coordinating council, even there grandmothers ran over each other and they didn’t allow anyone to participate in the elections. And in order to register for voting - it was also necessary to make an advance payment. So how does the society proposed alone differ from the existing one? Shocks and sharing that will offer to go through again?
        1. +8
          14 February 2013 09: 44
          Quote: vorobey
          but licking piderasts on the street when a 10-year-old child goes and asks dad and how can it really be? What should he answer?

          You don’t need to answer anything, just take a club and start kneading both. All questions will disappear hi
          Hi Sanya!
          1. +9
            14 February 2013 09: 59
            Quote: Alexander Romanov
            just take the club and start kneading both


            A man walks through the cemetery at night, scared, and suddenly hears a cry - P ... sys, well, what are you P ... sys.
            Well, the man went awry. slowed down and so already cautiously sneaking along the path further, and here again the cry is already closer - p..sy, well, what kind of p..sy are you.
            the man shook it even more fumbled in the grass, found a stick and so with a stick ready to go further here next to the path a hole and a voice from it help, give me your hand. Well, a man with a stick to his voice and started up, and he himself ran and in pursuit of him, well, you already understood what.
            1. +4
              14 February 2013 10: 21
              Quote: vorobey
              and in pursuit of him well, you already realized that


              CPSB. Guys liked it
            2. dusha233
              +3
              14 February 2013 16: 55
              Not at all how many people are hanging around the cemetery at night laughing
          2. +6
            14 February 2013 10: 00
            Quote: Alexander Romanov
            take a club and start kneading both

            What you are not a liberalist and not tolerast! good
            One thing is not clear, have they always been like this or have they been sharply redone? They blamed the USSR for their godlessness, and now they themselves have forgotten why the Creator criticized the soda and gamora
            1. +3
              14 February 2013 11: 01
              Quote: Denis
              One thing is not clear, have they always been like this or have they been sharply redone?

              There were, but in a small amount, and then the advertisement went and it started. request
              Quote: Denis
              They blamed the USSR for their godlessness, and now they themselves have forgotten why the Creator criticized the soda and gamora

              Now Russia is being blamed for Faith, I am feeling for it
            2. 0
              14 February 2013 19: 46
              A thief is always ready to criticize anyone you want louder than anyone, so long as they do not notice that it was he who flopped the wallet. They were always like that, just tired of hiding. I wanted to have pleasant emotions - to defiantly shit in the soul of these "miserable straight people". To take the kids away and drag themselves out of impunity ...
            3. SCS
              SCS
              0
              15 February 2013 10: 27
              Denis - "One thing is not clear, have they always been like this or have they changed dramatically?"
              ---------------------
              when during the time of the Inquisition they burned a huge number of women, then they redid it))
              (and regarding faith) to blame, they blamed, and their St. ministers raped the children of the orphanage at the monastery ......! They agreed with the fact, since they are talking about compensation for the victims!
          3. 0
            14 February 2013 10: 08
            Or how many of the revolutionaries shout a lot about the dangers of power, but in the end they can’t offer anything, but it’s great to shout, especially for grandmas — well, there are different funds, donations, membership fees. As far as I know, when choosing the opposition’s coordinating council, even there grandmothers ran over each other and they didn’t allow anyone to participate in the elections. And in order to register for voting - it was also necessary to make an advance payment. So how does the society proposed alone differ from the existing one? Shocks and sharing that will offer to go through again?


            that the opposition that the Baryzh government is one and the same ... offer another, subscribe to the article of the Criminal Code
            1. +3
              14 February 2013 10: 57
              Quote: Civil
              offer another - subscribe to the article of the Criminal Code


              Now, all the same, scary.
          4. +3
            14 February 2013 14: 17
            That's right, we have SLAVES, it is to the heart and soul, but what if in the geyrop? That a normal French father will answer a normal son, there they are also suing for an oblique look. I think the Frotsam are now a complete kayuk, the Arabs have begun, we’ll finish, there will be a riot.
        2. +8
          14 February 2013 10: 26
          Quote: vorobey
          I, as a layman, are least concerned about hucksters in power, but the licking piderasts on the street

          Sanya, hi ! The pederasts ceased to like the word "pederasts," and they began to demand that people call them "homosexuals." And then they considered the word “homosexuals” to be an insult, and began to demand that people begin to call them “urns.” And then the buggers began to demand that people call them “blue”. And then they began to demand that people begin to call them "gays." And then the buggers began to demand that people respectfully call them "persons of a different sexual orientation." And the rotten part of mankind all the time obsequiously expressed and announces full obedience to the buggers. Who is the rotten part of humanity, not small, you will guess ...
      2. Vanek
        +6
        14 February 2013 10: 10
        Quote: Civil
        go:


        We are going:

        Quote: Civil
        1. The official acts within the framework of the current legislation, and the official rent takes for doing or circumvention of the laws adopted by the State Duma.


        That’s it, fuck! Arrived.
        1. YuDDP
          0
          14 February 2013 23: 18
          Vanek, and so it is. They want money for any of their actions. Faced this on Okhotny Ryad.
      3. dmb
        +5
        14 February 2013 11: 57
        Don't think that your comment is "a voice crying in the wilderness." Unfortunately, the bad always grasps faster than the good. The shopkeeper does not care whether the workers in the bankrupt factory are starving or not. He is only interested in the income of his shop. For his sake, he was still stigmatizing pederasts yesterday, tomorrow he will lease their premises at a good percentage.
        Notice to yourself, apart from the usual set of phrases about "gay", the State Department and Nemtsov and Navalny have nothing to say to them about your post. However, thank God, there are fewer and fewer of them, and young people are increasingly asking the same questions as you.
      4. -2
        14 February 2013 16: 13
        Quote: Civil
        1. The official acts within the framework of the current legislation, and takes the official rent for the implementation or circumvention of the laws adopted by the State Duma.
        2. Laws are adopted by the ruling class, namely, capitalists, businessmen (swindlers) of all stripes, ALL elected bodies from a rural settlement to the Federation Council are composed of businessmen a little less than completely.
        3. Laws The ruling class writes for itself, and blames the perpetrators of an entrepreneurial fraudulent habit.

        Let's go over the points:
        1. Officials have long been acting outside the legislative framework.
        2. Laws are adopted by united Russia and the president of which is the expression of the will of the oligarchic elite.
        3. The ruling class does not write laws for themselves, but for others. They surround themselves with various immunities.
      5. YuDDP
        +1
        14 February 2013 23: 10
        Civil, put a plus, sorry there is no way to put a few more.
        In essence of the article: it is necessary to restore the article for sodomy, along with bestiality - this is for ethnic minorities from the Caucasus
    3. Steering wheel
      +1
      14 February 2013 13: 45
      A very interesting book has recently been published, in which the degradation of a Western society is phased, the degree of change in the attitude towards wealth and Jewish judicial percentage and the transformation of Catholicism into Judeo-Christianity is especially well shown (Protestantism - in which wealth is a symbol of election)
      I recommend reading
      Capitalism. The history and ideology of "monetary civilization"
      http://www.torrentino.com/torrents/1395222
  2. Kaa
    +11
    14 February 2013 08: 47
    History develops in a spiral. Let's look at the reasons for the decline of the Roman Empire - after all, the European Union unofficially positions itself as its heir.
    "The doctrine of the decline of morals was quite widespread among the ruling strata of Roman society. The prevalence of this doctrine was largely explained by the fact that it was based on some of the main categories of ancient Roman polis morality. Ancient Roman morality always had as its model the mores and customs of its ancestors. Respect for them was instilled in the Romans from childhood, in the family. The father instructed the children by his example; masks and insignia of ancestors were stored in the house at the most honorable place. The boundaries of morality based on such grounds were revealed at the moment when an individual placed himself outside the polis community and no longer recognized her sentence as implicit. This happened when a small community, grouped around Rome, began to enter the pan-Italian, and then the world stage. Initially, for every Roman, the decisive importance was the sentence, the opinion expressed about him by the community, Rome; exile "beyond the Tiber" was tantamount to civil death for him. Now he often ruled a foreign country, which was a large state, was surrounded by unheard-of, almost divine honors from the local population, and then he involuntarily entered such a path, following which he more and more felt independence from what they say about him at home in Rome. Thanks to this circumstance, the ancient morality that binds the polis community turns out to be no longer able to act as a regulator of the morals of the world state.
    So, the cause of the crisis of ancient Roman morality was the crisis of the polis, and the consequence was the "decline of morals", breaking of traditions, departure from ancient norms and foundations. This phenomenon is quite natural and natural. It was unthinkable to govern a huge state and assert not only material, but also spiritual superiority with the help of morality, which arose in a small Latin town and was designed only for its citizens.
    The main reasons for decay should be considered two passions, two vices, which at this particular time develop in Roman society: the thirst for power, ambition (ambitio) and the passion for money, greed (avaritia). "Ambition made people become liars, keeping one secret in mind, the other - expressing explicitly in words, evaluating friendly and hostile relations not in essence, but by calculation and care more about the attractiveness of appearance than internal content." Roman society finally got mired in vices and crimes. Only wealth is respected, virtue is trampled upon, poverty is considered a shame, honesty is almost unintentional. The youth turned out to be especially unstable, who, under the influence of greed and luxury, turned, on the one hand, to robbery, on the other, to insane spending, forgot shame and modesty and did not want to obey either human or divine laws " http://nounivers.narod.ru/bibl/utch2.htm
    Doesn’t resemble anything? And for me - so one in one gobbled up the European Union. But I think they won’t make any conclusions - they don’t read the history of Rome either.
    1. +8
      14 February 2013 09: 07
      Quote: Kaa
      two vices that developed precisely at this time in Roman society: a thirst for power, ambition (ambitio) and a passion for money, greed (avaritia).


      Bread and circuses, that is, to devour and protrude, the slogan leading to decomposition
    2. +3
      14 February 2013 14: 29
      By the way, yes, at the end of the Roman Empire, in addition to hypocrisy, hypocrisy, greed, debauchery and "pid .... stiya, really, there is only a lack of barbarians who will disperse this ... angry (sorry for directness)
      1. Cpa
        0
        15 February 2013 05: 45
        Islamic extremists and fundamentalists will be in this role.
  3. +19
    14 February 2013 08: 52
    “In the English Parliament, one speaker gave the remaining members of Parliament a peculiar witty trap. The issue of youth was discussed. The speaker read out from the podium four statements of different people about the youth. Here they are, these statements:

    1. Our young people love luxury, they are badly brought up, she scoffs at the authorities and does not respect the elderly at all. Our current children have become tyrants, they do not get up when an elderly person enters the room, they peretova to their parents. Simply put, they are very bad.

    2. I have lost all hope for the future of our country, if today's young people tomorrow take the reins of government into their own hands, for these young people are unbearable, impatient, simply terrible.

    3. Our world has reached a critical stage. Children no longer obey their parents. Apparently, the end of the world is not very far away.

    4. This youth is corrupted to the depths of the soul. Young people are insidious and careless. They will never be like the youth of old times. The younger generation of today will not be able to preserve our culture.

    All these sayings about youth, about the imminent death of culture, about a hopeless future, were greeted with applause in parliament. Then the speaker revealed the cards. It turns out that the first sentence belongs to Socrates (470-399 year BC), the second to Hesiod (720 year BC), the third to the Egyptian priest (2000 years BC), and the fourth was found in a clay pot in the ruins of Babylon pot age - 3000 years.

    It turned out in parliament very effectively and even funny. However, all these cultures really died. And the pot was found, alas, among the ruins of Babylon, and not in a prosperous city. ” (Vladimir Soloukhin, "Pebbles on the palm").
    1. +4
      14 February 2013 09: 02
      Greetings to Oleg. The article is very informative. thank good . Only so many clever words that it would be necessary to give separate explanations to them, otherwise my fragile brain begins to smoke, and the vulnerable child psyche suffers from this laughing
      1. +9
        14 February 2013 09: 06
        Quote: Mechanic
        The article is very informative. Thank good. Only so many clever words, that it would be necessary to give them some explanations, otherwise my weak brain starts to just smoke, and the child's vulnerable mind suffers from this laughing

        Hi, Eugene! Thanks for attention. Rejoice that I passed by Hegel. drinks
        1. +6
          14 February 2013 12: 52
          Quote: Mart
          . Rejoice that I passed Hegel.
          .

          It was the concept of "the end of the history of Western democracy" that was laid down by Hegel. He is the founder of the method of geopolitical analysis. He believed that the geopolitical map of the world is naturally divided into Old and New World, and the point is not only that America and Australia became known much later than the rest of the world. America and Australia are “new” not only relatively, but also essentially: in all their physical and spiritual nature.
          From Hegelian historiosophy directly flowed vanguard theory: the avant-garde monopolizes history, for the world spirit is embodied in it; other peoples and cultures not belonging to the vanguard, do not have the right to vote in political history. Marxism applied this dichotomy in his doctrine of the world-historical mission of the proletariat, neoliberalism in the concept of the "golden billion" and the unipolar world.
          Fukuyamu in his book The end of the story and the last man argues that the spread of Western-style liberal democracy in the world indicates the endpoint of the sociocultural evolution of humanity and the formation of the final form of government. In Fukuyama’s view, the end of history, however, does not mean the end of event history, but the end of a century of ideological confrontations, global revolutions and wars, and with them the end of art and philosophy. Fukuyama directly indicates that he is not the author of the concept of “end of history ", But only continues the development of ideas, the foundation of which was laid by Hegel, and then developed in the works of Karl Marx.
          Western civilization (peoples of the sea according to Hegel) are historically capable of creativity and progress in the arena of history. So these historical peoples. but along with this there is unhistorical peoples (incapable of creativity) - Native Americans (Indians), inhabitants of Africa. Wild Russia and Asia Hegel deprives the "unhistorical" peoples of their voting rights in history, believing that the destiny of these peoples is slavery and political dependence on Europeans..
          Now, when there is an acute shortage of resources and food in the world, it is necessary to regulate the size of the population; wars can dangerously burn out in a nuclear war. Therefore, it is necessary, on the one hand, to create a society of asexual consumers in the countries of the "golden" billion, sterilize the rest, as Bill Gates does in Africa, to destroy them by wars, revolutions, poverty and hunger. And in the future, the population will be regulated using genetic engineering and cloning technologies. quantitatively and qualitatively. (biorobots are peculiar.) Here is a picture of the future world - same-sex patricians and slaves - clones.

          I'll make a reservation right away, I didn't smoke grass, and I didn't buy hallucinogenic mushrooms from my granny near the Novoslobodskaya metro station.

          Well, we’ll finish as always on the positive
          [i] We Russians are the moral aristocracy of the world,
          replacing land and financial

          I.L. Solonevich
      2. +3
        14 February 2013 09: 10
        Quote: Mechanic
        . Only so many clever words that it would be necessary to give separate explanations to them, otherwise my fragile brain begins to simply smoke

        I read it to the end laughing
        1. +4
          14 February 2013 10: 07
          Quote: Alexander Romanov
          I read it to the end
          Not only read, but also found explanations for incomprehensible words. laughing
          1. +1
            14 February 2013 10: 58
            Quote: Mechanic
            but also found explanations for incomprehensible words.

            And I think, where did you go missing, turned out to be Ozhegov’s dictionary laughing
          2. 0
            16 February 2013 21: 27
            Alexander Romanov Until the end I read means [/ quote]

            [quote = Mechanic] Not only read, but also found explanations for incomprehensible words. [/ quote]

            Here is an example of a philosophical conversation between two enlightened people, only men under vodka are more convenient laughing hi
    2. +5
      14 February 2013 09: 08
      Quote: Mart
      However, all these cultures really perished. And the pot was found, alas, among the ruins of Babylon, and not in a prosperous city

      Now the words of this speaker will be found in the clay pot, though through 3000 for thousands of years, or so hi
      Hi Oleg winked
      1. +5
        14 February 2013 09: 23
        Quote: Alexander Romanov
        Now the words of this speaker will be found in the clay pot, though through 3000 for thousands of years, or so

        Hi Sasha!
        So we will look for potter civilizations.
        1. +3
          14 February 2013 09: 46
          Quote: Mart
          And so we will search for civilizations in pots

          Duc, I said that nothing has changed since Byzantium. So the text found in the ruins of Babylon can be left the same, just reprint for posterity hi
      2. +6
        14 February 2013 09: 39
        Quote: Alexander Romanov
        Now the words of this speaker will be found in a clay pot, though after 3000 thousand years


        And he will stand in the Hermitage or in the Russian Museum.

        Hello again.
        1. +5
          14 February 2013 09: 48
          Quote: vorobey

          And he will stand in the Hermitage or in the Russian Museum.

          A ballot box with US ashes will be there laughing
          Quote: vorobey
          Hello again.

          Above greetings left hi
          1. +5
            14 February 2013 10: 00
            Quote: Alexander Romanov
            US urn


            I understand the shit of a mammoth as an exhibit. but just shit why keep it. Give the Indians.
            1. +5
              14 February 2013 10: 56
              Quote: vorobey
              but just shit why keep it.

              There’s a sign on the ballot box. They loved democracy. hi
              1. +1
                14 February 2013 19: 00
                performed by Swarovski. glamorous, blue.
                1. +1
                  15 February 2013 00: 40
                  from the country-aaazikaaamiiiiiiiiii .................
    3. Kaa
      +2
      14 February 2013 10: 35
      Quote: Mart
      It turned out in parliament is very impressive and even funny. However, all these cultures really perished.

      The parliamentarian has a great sense of humor. But this only illustrates the spiral movement. Something similar to me came across in Ancient Greece. It turns out, and this civilization is doomed? Where is the way out of the spiral?
      1. 0
        15 February 2013 00: 39
        "but I know one secret. Here the exit is where the entrance is." (three in the boat not counting the dog)
  4. +2
    14 February 2013 08: 55
    Any highest idea can be brought to the point of absurdity that we are now observing in the West.
    1. +1
      14 February 2013 19: 08
      the idea brought to the absolute is absurd. not mine, somewhere in the course of philosophy met.
  5. fenix57
    +3
    14 February 2013 09: 41
    Everything that happens to gayrope Allen Dallas, the director of the US CIA 1953-1961 planned to do with the USSR: "... From literature and art, for example, we will gradually erase their social essence, wean artists, we will discourage them from engaging in images, researching those processes that take place in the depths of the masses. Literature, theater, cinema - everything will depict and glorify the most base human feelings. We will do our best to support and raise the so-called artists who will instill and hammer into the consciousness the cult of sex, violence, sadism, betrayal, in a word, all immorality. " hi
    1. +2
      14 February 2013 10: 14
      fenix57,
      Not calculated however! wink Do not dig another pit, you yourself will get into it! bully
      Interesting article. Thanks to the author! hi+ + +
      1. Nord007hold
        0
        14 February 2013 15: 45
        I'm afraid that we also got into it. Watch what's on TV and in the movies now. Aggressive nonsense, extolling what was previously considered a vice.
  6. vladsolo56
    +1
    14 February 2013 09: 46
    I do not agree with the author, simply because he, like many puts the individual at the forefront, they again try to take us away from the problem. What is base instincts, to multiply, according to the author, is a base instinct, so let's give it up. Although no, he means to enjoy this activity. But then if you remove the emotional coloring, then a person becomes like an animal, just multiplying. So what is the lowland instinct. But it was written instincts, what instincts a person still has, there are few of them, sleep, i.e. the instinct of conservation itself, it also means vicious. In general confusion.
    I have written and will repeat it more than once, the survival factor of society lies in the structure of society itself. as long as society rests on individualism and selfishness, it will never be sustainable. Only a communal, tribal order of relations is valid and can withstand internal and external threats.
    1. +6
      14 February 2013 10: 05
      However, there is one curious difference between Western countries and Russia, caused no longer by the desire of the authorities for Western-style democracy (quite to the ancient Greek: many lords still dream of slaves), but by the very Kantian interpretation of absolute morality, in which a reasonable being wants to achieve states, "when everything ... goes according to his will and desire." This is the very principle of extreme egoism and individualism, which has been implanted with great difficulty for a quarter of a century already in Russia and in the CIS, and which has reached unprecedented heights in the advanced West. From these very heights the West has yet to fall. It will be very painful!


      This is a quote from my article.

      Quote: vladsolo56
      I do not agree with the author, simply because he, like many others, prioritizes the individual, they are again trying to divert us from the problem. What is the base instincts, multiply in the opinion of the author base instinct, so let's give it up. Although no, he means to enjoy this activity.


      Quote from your comment. I think you read another article. laughing
      1. vladsolo56
        +2
        14 February 2013 11: 27
        Quote: Mart
        An intelligent man sits on a horse, representing his emotional impulses, which he uses in order to defeat the dragon, that is, his base instincts. "

        You cited this saying as something very relevant for solving all of the above problems.
        I do not think that homosexuality and other deviations are instincts of a normal person, this is ugliness. And in fact, today their significance and influence in society is too exaggerated.
        1. +1
          14 February 2013 19: 15
          vladsolo56, it (one) is progressing, which means there is cause for alarm.
    2. +8
      14 February 2013 10: 09
      Quote: vladsolo56
      , they again try to take us away from the problem. What is base instincts, to multiply, according to the author, is a base instinct, so let's give it up. Although no, he means to enjoy this activity. But then if you remove the emotional coloring, then a person becomes like an animal, just multiplying. So what is the lowland instinct.


      Yes, there is nothing base, everything is fine, or all, everything is playing with chickens, piglets. their own kind. children the main thing that would get pleasure.
      Then surely nothing human will remain in you. Instincts are developed in such a way, and human society most likely exists on certain moral and moral restrictions when a person himself can limit some of his desires and aspirations.

      For example, I like a shovel on a hump to walk someone's instinct I have. But I know that they can also deprive of freedom for this. I often have to limit myself and use it only for self-defense. And why - I have such an instinct. Why gays can suck on the street and I can’t come and grunt their shovel.
      1. +3
        14 February 2013 10: 40
        Quote: vorobey
        Why gays can suck on the street and I can’t come and grunt their shovel.

        because it is not tolerant laughing !!!
        1. +6
          14 February 2013 10: 51
          Quote: Tersky
          because it is not tolerant


          and tolerate my sick psyche? give me a reference. I will laminate it and will wet everyone who seems to me gay.
          Although no, it’s better not to, but the comrade-in-law can also be sent somewhere to compulsory treatment.
        2. 0
          15 February 2013 00: 37
          and not multicultural,
          If you were to go, shake them!
      2. vladsolo56
        +1
        14 February 2013 11: 29
        you confuse the concept of instinct and just deviations from these. This instinct is inherent in man as a subconscious behavior for the survival of the species. What the author cites and what you write is not instinct, but a deviation from it.
        By the way, as you put it, come up and hit with a shovel, this is also a deviation.
        1. +4
          14 February 2013 11: 37
          Quote: vladsolo56
          By the way, as you put it, come up and hit with a shovel, this is also a deviation.


          So you dug. What am I talking about. Why is one deviation imposed on us to be considered normal and urged to endure, and my deviation is considered not normal.

          Let’s take Freud’s teachings as a basis and abandon the Ten Commandments. We all become animals or homosapience bydlos primitive.
          1. vladsolo56
            0
            14 February 2013 11: 43
            but did I impose something on you, I only argued that as long as people are individualists, then public morality: this will not affect me. And only when the society is truly united, and for this a foundation is needed, and such a foundation can only be a family, a clan. Nothing else will work. It will be different either in the West, where everything is possible, or in the Muslim world, for rejecting death
            1. +2
              14 February 2013 11: 56
              Quote: vladsolo56
              and such a foundation can only be a family, a clan.


              This is the path to the direct destruction of Russia. Tribal order we have already passed. Take the history of the North Caucasus. Chechnya, Ingushetia, Dagestan, Circassia, cabaret, everything is tied to the clan and family as a result of blood feud, clanism and the same infringement of one another.

              Dig up even now what is happening in Africa. disparate Tuareg tribes, again, on the basis of tribal foundations. a united front they can do something. but as soon as the disassembly begins, they begin to wet them.

              Ancient Russia is a civil strife of tribes and as a result no unity. They are trying to crush everyone now, because managing a small one is easier. The easiest way to split society is by departing from the commandments of God, expanding it, so to speak, as we see. Why the monarchies of the Middle East stand and produce an alien idea to us, Why did the USSR survive under Stalin. strict rules and regulations the law of survival. Take the discipline of drug addicts and mafia groups. Continue further?
      3. +2
        14 February 2013 18: 03
        Hi Sanya. It feels like you have just such a shovel laughing
    3. 0
      16 February 2013 21: 34
      Quote: vladsolo56
      Only a communal, tribal order of relations is valid and can withstand internal and external threats.


      Need to go back to basics
  7. +5
    14 February 2013 09: 48
    Attention, girls of eastern and western europe

    REMOVING DAMAGE.

    disinterestedly. The desire to get in touch with women disappears after 3-5 sessions. You begin to live a full-fledged life, characteristic of the majority of the normal population of the earth.
    1. +1
      14 February 2013 10: 14
      and the wife will give good for magic sessions? wink or will offer an alternative option to cure the male population of Europe? wassat
      1. +3
        14 February 2013 10: 42
        Quote: strannik595
        and the wife will give good for magic sessions?


        here, after all, the main thing is to think over everything so as not to burn.
        1. 0
          14 February 2013 10: 51
          there is an option to open a sect, become an enlightened guru, recruit beautiful female and female adherents to travel to Europe with appropriate advertising support in the media drinks................. but this is only in a sweet dream, but for now, Sasha, a daughter and three heroes are on the agenda Yes
          1. +2
            14 February 2013 11: 16
            Quote: strannik595
            open a sect, become an enlightened guru


            I saw recently in a criminal chronicle of one such, they planted.

            Quote: strannik595
            female followers and voyages across Europe with relevant advertising support in the media


            rival Femen spoils everything.
    2. Kaa
      +9
      14 February 2013 10: 38
      Quote: vorobey
      REMOVING DAMAGE.

      Did you forget to put a comma? Logically, it should be REMOVING, DAMAGING laughing
      1. +4
        14 February 2013 11: 02
        Quote: Kaa
        Logically, there should be


        Kaa, according to the logic, it’s necessary to lick;

        drinks
        1. Kaa
          +2
          14 February 2013 11: 04
          Quote: vorobey
          spoiled before us

          Ah, what poachers! But, they say, plastic surgeons with this thing do wonders, and not just once?
          1. +4
            14 February 2013 11: 20
            Quote: Kaa
            plastic surgeons with entom work do wonders, and not once


            It’s interesting, but technology has already reached gay men or not. one to sew up. to others the other way around. By the way, similar narrow-profile technologies would be useful in our national economy. Officials for example. They have all licked for a long time. Judging by the stomachs, they all carry in themselves, the poor suffer.
  8. Aleksey44
    +8
    14 February 2013 10: 21
    In a same-sex family:
    - I want you!
    - I can’t, I have critical days.
    - What did you eat?
    1. +2
      14 February 2013 10: 55
      chilean red pepper wassat
  9. Psychojoker
    +4
    14 February 2013 10: 53
    Freedom, as such, is leaping with leaps and bounds into permissiveness. Life in society in general cannot be free by definition.
    However, to hell with this Europe. Even if in hell, even in the hippo’s ass, the main thing is that we stay and cleaned what remains of them stronger than before smile
  10. eagle owl
    +14
    14 February 2013 11: 12
    A good article! I say to my child this way: gays are sick people who are treated by our mother (wife, doctor, psychiatrist). According to doctors of people with such deviations up to 3% of the general population, the rest get symptoms in the process of socialization. Normal socialization It is possible only in a normal family with mom and dad. Therefore, their desire to destroy the traditional structure of society is understandable.
    1. +6
      14 February 2013 11: 30
      Quote: Uhu
      Normal socialization is possible only in a normal family with mom and dad. Therefore, their desire to destroy the traditional structure of society is understandable.


      A huge plus for these words.

      With a family, it all starts.
  11. sergeybulkin
    +1
    14 February 2013 11: 38
    Well, why on earth would a deputy, or an official, or the government take care of the interests of their ordinary citizens, if he has never been in their shoes? If they consider themselves to be among the "elite", then they are already on the other side of the barricades.
    For example, in the bourgeois countries the real defender of the interests of the people has always been the trade unions, and the bourgeois are afraid of them there and reckon with them. In the states, an entrepreneur has no right to fire, transfer, demote a worker without the consent of the trade union. Hire guest workers. There, trade unions are a real force in the fight against the tyranny of employers. But! The stick, as always, is a double-edged sword for trade union members it is more difficult to get a job there. Of course, trade unions are an empty place without legislative support. Like ours, for example. And in the USSR and now (if they exist now) they seem to exist, but only on paper. You can really fight for your rights only yourself, it's not for nothing that they say "you want to do well, do it yourself." feel
  12. sergeybulkin
    +1
    14 February 2013 12: 37
    Fagots are just ugliness, a deviation from the norm, well, like left-handed people, for example, innate or acquired is not important. And in the animal kingdom it’s full of such things, males are constantly born who prefer males instead of females. For example: (left-handed people, dear people, this is not about you), even flounder fish have left-handed people and although they are not able to produce offspring, they still occur.
    Ndo to seek so that the ugliness is not made the norm, but to treat it. And if it’s not treated, then protect society from fagots that they did not corrupt the normal.
    1. walter_rus
      0
      14 February 2013 23: 08
      Proponents of pederasty say that since it is found in animals, then this is normal. But cannibalism is also common in animals (some may even devour their offspring) - does that also suit people?
      1. 0
        15 February 2013 00: 33
        Animals eat their offspring when they realize that they all will not be able to survive; there isn’t enough food, but they don’t eat all the 1-2 strongest ones. The strongest survives. And which of these .... rastov strong?
  13. +2
    14 February 2013 12: 44
    Only I’m afraid that ours and the pederasts are fighting not because they don’t like them, but so that it’s not like in the sworn west ... I don’t know why, but such thoughts go into our heads, although we are inculcating the western education system ... and in general something, I understand our government poorly, either stupid, or they are very smart there ...
    1. 0
      15 February 2013 00: 30
      here I am about the same: "I'm standing on the asphalt, I'm shod in skis, or the skis are not the same, or am I freaked out?"
  14. Alikovo
    0
    14 February 2013 12: 50
    in France, the people are against the legalization of same-sex marriages and adoption by fagots of children, and the government approves of this ugliness. people even signatures have collected more than 600.000 signatures and where is their vaunted democracy. fagots - deviation from evolution.
  15. 0
    14 February 2013 13: 26
    Quote: Alikovo
    and where is their vaunted democracy. fagots - deviation from evolution.

    fagots they are such fagots ... here the question is different, if we say impartially, the issue of attitude to same-sex love is a matter of the culture of the people, somewhere like in medieval Japan, for example, or ancient Greece, this was normal, though the Spartan warriors and samurai not a couple of the current dovecote - real evil fighting pederasts, but here’s how they can pass such laws in countries where people supposedly believe in a god who has sodomized Sodom and Gomorrah, I absolutely do not understand that their Pope is right to resign, he has nothing to brag about
    1. sergeybulkin
      +3
      14 February 2013 14: 02
      Battle bugger... that sounds... but this was not enough! laughing laughing laughing
      1. +1
        14 February 2013 14: 05
        Quote: sergeybulkin
        Battle bugger ... that sounds.

        Combat means active laughing
  16. +1
    14 February 2013 13: 29
    "selfishness, or parasitism on others, can work and benefit me only in a society where my behavior is an exception to the rule"

    That is why Caucasians thrive when they come to live in Russia. And at home, where everyone is trying to parasitize on each other - they live in poverty and devastation.
  17. 0
    14 February 2013 14: 27
    On the topic of damage to Western "civilization" on the "Eye of the Planet" site, I have just read an interesting article about a cruise ship that hangs out in the Gulf of Mexico. Here is the link: http: //oko-planet.su/phenomen/phenomennews/165702-ochevidcy-na- laynere-za
    stryavshem-v-meksikanskom-zalive-lyudi-odichali-i-derutsya-za-edu.html. So I want to say: o tempera, o mores.
  18. +4
    14 February 2013 15: 00
    Thanks to the author for the article! good I liked it - everything is clear and to the point. In my opinion, the author gives the West a peculiar and undeserved compliment - no one reads the works and ideas of the troubled old man Kant there for a long time. But the writings of Ain Rand (colloquially, Alisa Zinovievna Rosenbaum) on objectivism, which puts rational individualism at the forefront, is yes. This is there - a handbook. As an example, I note that the sales of Rand's books exceed by more than an order of sale the works of K. Marx.
    To understand where the ears grow from in the current disastrous problems of the West, read at least her opus "Atlas Shrugged", which is incredibly popular there.
    The main idea - the proper moral goal of life is the pursuit of one's own happiness or “rational egoism”, that the only social system, in accordance with this morality, is full respect for individual human rights.
    And spit on gays and lesbians on the opinions of other people - they are only interested in their own happiness.
    The West will not be destroyed by piderasts, but by egoism. Piderasts will only give this process a corresponding rotten shade.
    And when I see how my daughter and her peers share food in the kindergarten with other children or help the fallen to get up, I understand that in my country, not everything is lost.
    What about the West? What is the West? He made his choice, there he is dear.
  19. 0
    14 February 2013 15: 38
    Quote: Iraclius
    But the writings of Ayn Rand (colloquially, Alisa Zinovievna Rosenbaum) on objectivism, which puts rational individualism at the forefront, is yes. This is there - a handbook. As an example, I note that the sales of Rand's books exceed by more than an order of sale the works of K. Marx.

    Well her
    It seems to be from a relatively normal family - parents died in the blockade, tried to drag one sister to America, she soon sent everyone and returned to the Union ...
  20. MG42
    +4
    14 February 2013 15: 44
    Today, speaking of the tainted Western civilization and comparing its decline with the fall of Ancient Rome, the Western representatives themselves are sadly not talking about victory "over base instincts", but about indulging them with the very minority that now sets the tone for democracy. For "everything in his existence goes according to his will and desire."
    This minority, unfortunately, has penetrated the European power and indeed it is highly organized = >> lobbying for laws that destroy the morality of the traditional majority. This is due to the traditional Euro tolerance and indifference to what is happening in the majority of the inhabitants. Not many dare to protest against same-sex marriages, and a wedding in a homosexual church = >> is a desecration of the church.
    As for the decline of the Roman Empire, among the reasons for the weakening of internal civil strife and the frequent change of power, the fall of morality, one can certainly highlight the invasion of barbarians = >>> that we are now seeing migrants from Africa flooded Europa and bear a real threat to the remaining European values. This is the face of modern Western civilization in the photo.
    1. 0
      16 February 2013 22: 07
      Quote: MG42
      Here it is the face of modern Western civilization in the photo


      It’s interesting, but the one on the left understands that under the Nazis he didn’t have a chain but a rope on his neck would be. And this is in the best case.
  21. 0
    14 February 2013 23: 33
    I think that the Pope also decided to resign because he lost the battle with Sodom and Gomorrah .. sorry
  22. 0
    15 February 2013 00: 27
    I do not want to be cattle!
    And I do not want to be considered them!
  23. +1
    15 February 2013 01: 49
    the right of homosexual couples to marry provoked outrage of a significant part of the French people, who are absolutely not satisfied with this version of the evolution of civilization. But the fact is that no one asks anything from these people.

    I think France is waiting for its 1991.
    The fact that the authorities do not hear the people and fenced off by the gendarmes and the police.
    The country is bogged down on the most do not hang out in Mali with its "Afghanistan". And now when France will receive hundreds of zinc coffins in all cities and towns, the people will rise up. Now the French nation in full growth is facing the question of survival in the face of the economic crisis, unemployment, surrounded by gays, blacks, Arabs and other rabble from the former colonies. The French must pray to their Saint Joan of Arc to save their homeland again from the clutches of the evil one and his army.
  24. +1
    15 February 2013 05: 08
    Powerful article Oleg, take off my hat hi
  25. +1
    15 February 2013 18: 16
    She also lived under Socialism, and for 20 years now under Capitalism, which proclaimed - "democracy" ... As it seemed to me, DEMOCRACY is a way to steal with impunity, corrupt the people, turn people into ignorant trash, drinking from hopelessness, which will be easier to manage. Socialism is free high-quality education, including higher education; free medical care, including any complexity of the operation; comfortable old age, and no one will kick out the apartment that could be earned! Capitalism is a beggarly old age, getting sick is like death, even for the treatment of children - not the State, but with an outstretched hand to the entire population, they will be thrown out of the apartment in no time, regardless of the season and young children, education ... well, sorry. ..
  26. 0
    16 February 2013 22: 49
    Yes, the article hooked the author thanks!
  27. Borisych
    +1
    17 February 2013 16: 29
    Not a supporter of open militant homosexuality, as well as public heterosexual relationships flaunted - this is, according to Christian moral standards (from the point of view of which homosexuality is condemned) - a sacrament for two (and not several). Therefore, these relationships are called intimate. The West is now at that stage of development when Christian standards of decency are in conflict with the life situation. I don’t know what this will lead to and I don’t presume.
    1. +1
      17 February 2013 16: 46
      Quote: Borisych
      I don’t know, and I don’t presume to predict.

      Is it difficult? Example: the arrogant and considered all the other barbarians Rome, to the hakatu, too, very mired in different ... shrines
  28. 0
    17 February 2013 23: 32
    The latest news on this front - I know from reliable sources that the next legislation is already being prepared - on the registration of unions with more than two participants - congratulations, we have jumped ... now not only Sharia and polygamy, but all sorts of "Swedish" and "Hawaiian" " families.
    I can suggest what will happen next- pedophilia, bestiality and necrophilia .. Ugh

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"