Hitler was a pawn in the game of the West against the Russian people.

48
Hitler was a pawn in the game of the West against the Russian people.80 years ago, German President Hindenburg appointed Adolf Hitler Reich Chancellor

30 January 1933, 44-year-old Adolf Hitler became the German chancellor. As Voland from “The Master and Margarita” Bulgakov said in a similar case, “Annushka has already spilled oil”. The further stay of Hitler at the helm of the country - it was one big story preparing for the main and most terrible adventure, both personally of his biography, and world history of the XX century.

But could it be otherwise? This question has long been a concern for historians around the world, and there are various versions. One of the most popular is that Hitler did not act independently. War - not his brainchild. Different historians - adherents of this theory sometimes differ only in the assessment of the independence of this character.

One of the prominent supporters of this theory is, for example, the famous Russian historian and publicist Nikolai Starikov. In his article “Hitler and the USA were forced to attack the USSR?” He, in particular, writes: “Adolf Hitler was brought to power by London, Washington and, to a lesser extent, Paris. It was a certain chain dog who was reared for the sole purpose of attacking Russia. They themselves do not like to fight, someone has to do it for them. They brought a strong-willed person, a fanatic to power, gave him money, loans, stopped collecting reparations from Germany, restored the industry. But how can Hitler start a war with the USSR if there are states between them? ”

In an interview with the browser KM.RU, our experts commented on this thesis.

Publicist, political scientist Anatoly Wasserman:

- My old friend, historian and publicist Lev Versovich, repeatedly noted that many of the details of Adolf Hitler’s swift career can only be explained on the basis of the fact that he was specially selected from outside the many competing leaders of external forces. Moreover, they selected him according to a rather unusual criterion: these very external forces (mainly British and American) needed a man fanatical enough to fulfill all his promises regardless of the possible consequences. And they were calculated quite easily: a program built around hatred of other nations, inevitably had to cause the rallying of these other nations against Germany.

The point of this choice was, firstly, to sharply exclude the victory of Germany in the upcoming world war and, secondly, to ensure that after the war Germany’s reputation was spoiled for many years to come. But such a choice was possible and inevitable, first of all, because no one doubted the inevitability of the war itself, that all interested individuals and organizations understood perfectly well that it was inevitable and would be even worse than the First World War.

Actually, when the Versailles Peace Treaty was concluded, the Supreme Commander of the Entente troops, Marshal of France Ferdinand Bertranovich Foch, familiarized himself with the terms of the treaty, immediately declared: "This is not peace: this is a truce for two decades." And he turned out to be absolutely right: the war began just twenty years after the conclusion of the Versailles Treaty. The fact is that the contradictions between countries and groups of countries that gave rise to the First World War did not disappear and could not disappear as long as a market economy exists: it inevitably gives rise to contradictions of this kind, inevitably forces the once divided world again and again therefore, the continuation of the war was obviously inevitable. And, of course, different countries tried to prepare for it in different ways. In particular, the United Kingdom and the United States of America prepared for themselves a convenient adversary.

As for the prospect that racial theory will gradually grow into mass murder, this did not bother anyone seriously, because then all the major countries were obsessed with different forms of racial theory, and, naturally, each expected that it would be the highest race. Actually, Hitler rather accurately reproduced the theory in his writings and his works, which had been developed by the Englishman Chamberlain and the Frenchman Gobino before. So it didn’t really bother anyone: everyone expected that the blow would fall on others. In principle, then all Western countries were passionate about racial theories in one form or another. The only large country where such a theory has never found a comfortable ground for itself is our country. And, accordingly, one can, of course, consider some of the actions of Germany, as the lawyers say, the excesses of the performer, but these excesses were, perhaps, no longer in Germany, but in other countries.

Expert Natalia Makeeva Center for Geopolitical Expertise:

- The theory proposed by Starikov, in my opinion, has the right to exist, and, in principle, it looks quite logical. Another theory is just as logical, according to which the events of World War II simply repeated the events of the 1812 war of the year as a terrible copy. According to the Russian historian Alexei Yedrikhin, published under the name of Vandam, Napoleon should, in theory, fight with England, but instead he began to fight with Russia.

And the events of the Second World War were to develop in a similar way, that is, Germany had to identify with Russia (actually, our countries followed this path) and oppose the United States, against England, against this Atlantic vector. However, this did not happen in a striking way, contrary to all geopolitical logic and common sense. Moreover, the racist theory, for which the whole world still hates Hitler so much, was also not initially relevant in his political life. Initially, his activities did not involve anything like this. Inside the German elites, two vectors fought, one of which suggested the theory of the rights of peoples, and the other just put forward this monstrous racist theory, which still causes horror in everyone.

Thus, what happened in 30-40's was not predetermined and, in my opinion, was obviously the result of an external (relative to Germany) game. The only question is, whose intelligence services were these - England or the United States, or did these countries act somehow jointly, as a result of which Hitler directed all the power of his army not to the West, but to the East.

It's all pretty complicated intertwined. First, he was influenced by his own elites, that is, he was not independent, as we know from history, even in relation to his own elites who influenced him. Of course, one cannot discount his own ambitions and vanity, but he was not an independent figure. It just so happened that in the German elites, this vector eventually won, which later dealt with opponents.

As for influence from the West, it certainly was, and you can only discuss the extent to which it was strong. It is unlikely that we will completely find out whether these were subtle diplomatic games or whether Hitler was under direct control. That is, one cannot exclude the possibility that initially he could send his forces both to the West and to the East.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

48 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +17
    8 February 2013 15: 56
    The fact that Hitler is a product of Western policy, which had the goal of destroying the USSR, is a well-known fact .. So this theory is just another confirmation ...
    1. bemsy
      +16
      8 February 2013 16: 25
      The theory itself cannot be a confirmation of anything. It is necessary to confirm it itself.
      1. FATEMOGAN
        +11
        8 February 2013 17: 34
        if you look closely, in almost all the wars that Russia has been forced to wage over the past centuries, the Naglo-Saxon and then the American ears stick out, in different ways, but stick out, that there are eternal wars with the Turks, that with Japan, with the Germans, they’re everywhere the nose of these island shortcomings.
        1. bemsy
          +1
          8 February 2013 17: 53
          Old men, log in.
          1. FATEMOGAN
            +2
            8 February 2013 18: 22
            Quote: bemsy
            Old men, log in.

            only after you, comrade Rezun (aka Suvorov).
            1. bemsy
              -5
              8 February 2013 18: 27
              1: 1.
              But all the same, in vain do you betray the natural process of competition between countries as a global conspiracy.
              1. FATEMOGAN
                +1
                8 February 2013 18: 48
                Quote: bemsy
                But all the same, in vain do you betray the natural process of competition between countries as a global conspiracy.

                world conspiracy, and where did I write this? I mean that behind many wars and humanitarian catastrophes, as these processes do not call, true conductors are hiding, you just need to know the true face of the enemy. angry
              2. +3
                8 February 2013 19: 59
                As a result of "natural" competition by the hands of the Anglo-Saxons, entire nations and countries were destroyed, for such acts in any criminal code Capital punishment.
                1. FATEMOGAN
                  0
                  8 February 2013 20: 43
                  Quote: Setrac
                  As a result of "natural" competition by the hands of the Anglo-Saxons, entire nations and countries were destroyed, for such acts in any criminal code Capital punishment.

                  they don't need a lot, send a couple of "poplars" to visit them and let the adversaries warm up bully , the world will definitely breathe a sigh of relief.
              3. AlexW
                0
                8 February 2013 21: 04
                bemsy, a natural process of competition between countries laughing
          2. 0
            8 February 2013 20: 25
            bemsy,
            Then the west was raffled off - mum don't worry. By the way, the current state of affairs in the world is extremely reminiscent of those years. The Germans were sent east by the Angles and Amers.
          3. 0
            9 February 2013 00: 30
            bemsy
            Old men, log in.


            I support +++++++++++++ !!! good good good drinks
        2. +4
          8 February 2013 18: 11
          Quote: FATEMOGAN
          protruding arrogant Saxon and then Americanos ears
          Naturally ... the Great Britain remained great .. Only after the collapse of the empire there wasn’t enough strength ... That’s why they are guided by the principle of divide and rule ... And the Americans are just successors, at the genetic level ... They’re not a single real war territories did not lead and do not know what war is ...
          Someone else's death is perceived as the death of a computer soldier in a game, nothing more ....
          1. FATEMOGAN
            +2
            8 February 2013 18: 36
            and even when they were in power, the arrogant Saxons themselves tried not to fight and pit their neighbors, recently read an article whose meaning that, in the whole history, since the onset of arrogance, only in 8 countries of the world their military boot has not stepped on. it just says this, who is the main supplier of warrior, death, hunger, violence and devastation, who is a cancerous tumor on our earth.
      2. 0
        8 February 2013 19: 20
        Quote: bemsy

        The theory itself cannot be a confirmation of anything. It is necessary to confirm it itself.

        To the point.
    2. +1
      8 February 2013 21: 44
      Hitler sits on a birch
      That birch bends
      Look comrade Stalin
      How does he ..fight
    3. Kaa
      +1
      8 February 2013 22: 05
      Quote: domokl
      Hitler is a product of Western policy that had the goal of destroying the USSR. A well-known fact.

      He, "poor fellow", was also banal "thrown". As he swore and swore in "Mein Kampf" that he would never go either west or south, but only against the "Bolshevik subhumans" to the east - to conquer living space. And they seemed to believe him - they were allowed to enter the demilitarized Rhineland, they were allowed to invite Austria on the Anschluss tour, Czechoslovakia with the most powerful industry was given away. Then - you need to somehow get to the borders of the USSR - they allowed the blitzkrieg in Poland, assuring that to fight with ground forces they won't, so they fly a little, they look like submarine cruisers ... And a common border arose between Germany and the USSR. The time has come to repay debts - to attack the communists. For complete confidence, Hitler also sent his first deputy to England for negotiations on fighters, supposedly secretly, in a fit of insanity. About what he talked to the Naglich people - maybe in 15 years we will find out, although it is unlikely - they strangled Hess exactly on the English shift in the Spandau prison before his release, so that he would not tell what. And it was clear that there was something to tell - it was not in vain that Hitler, fulfilling the agreements, did not touch the British at Dunkirk, let them get out to their islands. And England, with the hands of Hitler, with the eternal European rival - France, got rid of, and even then they read secret radio messages sent by "Enigma", but did not warn neither the Dutch, nor the Belgians, nor the French. Because the old Britons had a treaty with Hitler, yeah. We do not touch you, you solve your problems in Europe and switch to Russia, and that was the decision. But Churchill could not allow such a strengthening of Germany, which could have happened during the defeat of the Red Army, so on 22.06.41 he spoke on the radio and upset Hitler to stomach cramps, announcing that he would help Russia. The entire German generals understood that the polar fox crept up unnoticed, but it was already too late. And no matter how hard it was for the Red Army in 1941-1942, these were responses to the not very successful improvisations of Hitler, "thrown" by the British at the most crucial moment. But England had to take harsh revenge on him, so much so that for 50 lousy destroyers of World War I the Britons had to give up the islands in the United States, for the first time in English history ... = a striped flag, encircling the entire planet. It's a shame to the British, but what can you do now - Canada, India, Australia fell off the hostess and went on an independent voyage. Moral - do not throw, but you will not be thrown ... hi
      1. Cpa
        0
        9 February 2013 00: 49
        Maybe the United States started it.
    4. vadimus
      0
      8 February 2013 22: 06
      Another way to quarrel nations. Metotika Anglo-Saxon you .. fuckers .....
  2. ZKBM-BUT
    +3
    8 February 2013 16: 09
    here is all the information related to the negatives in the history of mankind for some reason is inevitably intertwined with America and England. why is that? how to explain it? in their genes chtoli laid down to kill, rob and destroy?
    1. +2
      8 February 2013 18: 09
      This is not a matter of genes, but of the struggle of systems, the system of slavery (exploitation of man by man), the legacy of Rome and the Slavs and Rus systems, the legacy of free Novgorod, if you like. Before the Romanovs, the Slavs did not have slavery as such. The eternal struggle between light and darkness is a consumer system and a system culture and spirituality. The fact that products and goods can be enough for everyone if slave owners observe the measure, isn’t that so?
    2. +1
      8 February 2013 19: 27
      Quote: ZKBM-BUT
      in their genes chtoli laid down to kill, rob and destroy?

      This is not human. Their money (in the sense of profit) is the goal of life, and money basically is just a tool and nothing more. A measure of the usefulness of a person to society. Not long for them. Soon the dollar bubble will burst, then the time will come for a change.
  3. +11
    8 February 2013 16: 10
    The United States and now support any gangsters, terrorists, fascists, with one condition, they must be against the Russian people. Since that time, nothing has changed, only the enemy has become more dodgy, meaner, meaner.
  4. 0
    8 February 2013 16: 17
    Quote: domokl
    The fact that Hitleo is a product of Western policy, which had the goal of destroying the USSR, is a well-known fact .. So this theory is just another confirmation ...

    So Lenin is also a product of Europe, the whole revolution was on their money, what is happening now is also a kind of money flow coming from different developed powers, the fact is that Russia is interesting as a raw materials appendage, and not as a state with a self-sufficient economy, and that in the Russian political elite there are mishandled and paid Cossacks this is a fact. When the world realized that the Russians could not be defeated from outside, thanks to our spirit and natural ingenuity, they began to strangle us from the inside out with various kinds of reforms: in the army, in education, in the economy. They need a dumb, hungry nation without a strong army.
    1. djon3volta
      +7
      8 February 2013 16: 28
      Well, for example, Navalny, for example, at the Yale Institute, think biology and drafting studied? Or maybe drawing? wassat
      1. Cpa
        0
        9 February 2013 00: 51
        No, they taught them to love their homeland! laughing
  5. djon3volta
    +6
    8 February 2013 16: 24
    sorry Hitler and Stalin did not make friends. I really say, the USSR and Germany could ALL PLANET bend!!! really saynow there would be no America, no parody, no dollars, no Anglo-Saxons, no Rockefellers or Rothschilds, there would be no American democracies! nor any Arab wars! now there would be supercivilization! and present for example the WHOLE PLANET called the USSR? how do you like that? wassat
    1. sergeant1973
      +1
      8 February 2013 16: 42
      two bears in the same den
    2. -1
      8 February 2013 17: 35
      Often I meet with comments like John Travolta (djon3volta) and I can’t get it all right, or is it on someone’s order and for money that carries such nonsense or is it essentially such (censorship)
    3. +5
      8 February 2013 18: 15
      That would not be, Hitler was originally an anti-Bolshevik. Another question is if Hitler would not have come to power. Then there really would have been a military union of the USSR - the Weimar Republic. And indeed it was mutually beneficial to cooperate. Alas...
      1. AlexW
        -1
        8 February 2013 20: 39
        SnoopEt precisely here and there, the "chosen by God" (and the eastern ones) were in power. But the "western" had other plans, so they handed the reins of government to Hitler, indicated the direction of movement. He clearly followed the instructions - to himself the "living space" was clearing , at the same time provided an inexhaustible flow of "repatriates" to Palestine - to the "historical homeland".
  6. +3
    8 February 2013 16: 33
    Quote: djon3volta
    Well, for example, Navalny, for example, at the Yale Institute, think biology and drafting studied? Or maybe drawing?

    In addition to Navalny, we have enough episodes, take Chubais, what did you study in the states? That's right, so privatization, even the famous Ostap could not, and a bunch of such examples can be cited.
  7. +1
    8 February 2013 16: 33
    Wasserman, as always, about nothing. And the topic of the article is best described by the works of N.A. Narochnitskaya. The systemic roots of the hostile attitude of the West to Russia in the works of L.N. Gumilyov. Hitler's monologue in the final scene "White Tiger" by Karen Shakhnazarov is remarkable. Pikul has also written a lot about this.
    Starikov did not discover anything new. IMHO.
  8. 0
    8 February 2013 16: 34
    Quote: RomCH
    So Lenin is also a product of Europe, the whole revolution was with their money,
    Even if this is true (although, as one movie hero said "I am tormented by vague doubts"), Lenin and his associates managed to build an independent state and pursue a policy independent of anyone. And why the Germans, who allegedly allocated money to Lenin, did not voice this fact during War? The effect is a bomb! But no. It means that either the hopes of the "sponsors" did not come true, and they were embarrassed to admit that they were simply "thrown", or such an event never happened in nature.
    1. +2
      8 February 2013 17: 52
      The Bolsheviks, led by Lenin, even probably carried out revolutionary activities with the money of the West. But he, as it turned out, did not want to sell his homeland. Instead of Tsarist Russia, another even more powerful state appeared. And this is at the expense of foreign "well-wishers". They will never calm down. When our country has an opportunity, we will need to crush them like bedbugs
    2. wax
      -2
      8 February 2013 17: 52
      Lenin has nothing to do with Western money. It is proved long ago, all documents are carefully analyzed. A fake was cooked up, known by whom, etc. Moldy falsifications are being pulled out of oblivion by the enemies of the Russian people.
      1. Cpa
        0
        9 February 2013 00: 55
        No revolution is free, it is a costly process. Why is everyone silent about this?
  9. +3
    8 February 2013 16: 48
    Hitler went to the queens on the chessboard of Europe. And it took four years of the game to save the party, started by the West.
  10. +1
    8 February 2013 17: 55
    Hitler, now Alkaida.
  11. 0
    8 February 2013 18: 03
    Quote: revnagan
    Lenin and his associates managed to build an independent state and pursue an independent policy from no one.

    But nothing, that before Lenin, tsarist Russia was much stronger, both economically and politically, and they brought such disagreement into the masses that the son went against his father because of the ideology created

    Quote: sergeant1973
    sorry Hitler and Stalin did not make friends. I really say, the USSR and Germany could bend ALL THE PLANET !!! I’m really saying that now there would be no America, no parody, no dollars, no Anglo-Saxons, neither the Rockefellers nor the Rothschilds, there would be no American democracies! nor any Arab wars! now there would be supercivilization! but imagine for example an WHOLE PLANET called the USSR ? how do you like that?

    If you talk like that, then you can combine Napoleon and Alexander first, complete heresy.
  12. 0
    8 February 2013 18: 05
    Quote: sergeant1973
    sorry Hitler and Stalin did not make friends. I really say, the USSR and Germany could bend ALL THE PLANET !!! I’m really saying that now there would be no America, no parody, no dollars, no Anglo-Saxons, neither the Rockefellers nor the Rothschilds, there would be no American democracies! nor any Arab wars! now there would be supercivilization! but imagine for example an WHOLE PLANET called the USSR ? how do you like that?

    If you talk like that, then you can combine Napoleon and Alexander first, complete heresy.
    1. AlexW
      +1
      8 February 2013 20: 44
      Romch,Napoleon and Alexander were the first to unite.... You will probably be surprised, but such an alliance was against England. And she, as always, managed to destroy him, send Napoleon to Russia
      1. AlexW
        0
        8 February 2013 21: 10
        Tilsit Peace Treaty."Russia and France pledged to help each other in every offensive and defensivewar, wherever it is required by the circumstances. This close alliance eliminated Napoleon's only strong rival on the continent; England remained isolated; both powers pledged by all means to compel the rest of Europe to comply with the continental system. On July 7, 1807, the treaty was signed by both emperors "
  13. kin
    +2
    8 February 2013 18: 42
    The political crises in Germany in 1932 were caused by the reluctance of the old president (Hindenburg) to appoint Hitler as chancellor. The creators of Hitler arranged for him (Hindenburg): 1) government crises, 2) crushed by money and authority.
    Hindenburg himself once said about the protege of the monopolies: "His - the chancellor? The most important - the Minister of Post. So that he licks my ass on stamps" It was hinted at the need to moisten postage stamps before sticking on envelopes. And the stamps depicted the president himself.
  14. stranik72
    0
    8 February 2013 20: 55
    The essence of Western politics is revealed in the book by "President Clinton's favorite professor," Carroll Quigley. He, a bright representative of the behind-the-scenes elite, and educator of its future members, wrote the book Tragedy and Hope in the 1970s, in which he outlined the history of the creation of the behind-the-scenes power. British policy on these issues, Quigley writes, was set out in seven points in a secret document delivered to Germany, because "the British government could not publicly confess to its own people about these" seven points ", because they were unacceptable to the British public opinion "
    These are seven points:
    1. Hitler's Germany is the main defense against the spread of communism in Europe
    2. The Quadripartite Pact between Britain, France, Germany and Italy, consolidating the Anglo-French Entente and the Axis Rome-Berlin, and excluding any Russian influence, is the goal that we strive for as the foundation of a stable Europe
    3. Britain will not object to the German acquisition of Austria, Czechoslovakia and Danzig.
    4. Germany should not use force to achieve these goals, because it will start a war in which public opinion will push Britain.
    5. An agreement with Germany, limiting the number and use of bombers, is desirable
    6. Britain could transfer to Germany certain (Portuguese and Belgian) African colonies if Germany showed cooperation in the above.
    7. Britain will put pressure on Czechoslovakia and Poland in order to achieve the results of negotiations desirable for Germany.
    And so on, who cares about it on the network.
  15. 0
    8 February 2013 21: 34
    This is what everyone needs to remember. There was no conspiracy between Stalin and Hitler, there were no compromises, there was no weakness. The West (which today compares with Stalin’s Hitler, and our liberal freaks sing along singly) created Hitler and Nazi Germany and set it against the USSR. And Stalin alone opposed this whole flurry, and even the Trotsky-Zinoviev opposition. Of the two evils, the lesser is chosen. The forest is cut - chips fly.
  16. 0
    8 February 2013 21: 41
    History abhors subjunctive moods. Old people are right. The world is ruled by Great Britain and Switzerland. Over the last century, Russia has been robbed and destroyed three times. But she always rose from the ashes. Now they decided to finish us off completely. We have grown the "fifth column" and now it is doing everything to make the country a maximum of a third-rate. For 20 years, all the key positions were occupied by the enemies of Russia. Now they bleed the country, pumping out financial juice in favor of the world's shadow rulers. Sincerely.
    1. alkach555
      0
      8 February 2013 22: 30
      Well, for every 5th column there is a 6th
  17. dmb
    0
    8 February 2013 22: 29
    "The theory proposed by Starikov". And this "expert" Mokeeva apparently says "taller" and "shirsh". She at least looked at the concept of theory in the dictionary.
    He is a lucky opportunist who writes what the authorities and certain sections of the population like, who are good at everything that is better than Gorbachev and Yeltsin, at least outwardly. For the information of the "theory creator". Back in the 60s, the Kukryniksy published a caricature in a satirical magazine in which England, France and the USA are feeding a baby Hitler lying in a cradle.
  18. 0
    8 February 2013 23: 21
    Tired of the theory of a global conspiracy against the Russian people.
    Nothing more to do!
    The driving force of history is not a struggle of classes, but there is a struggle of ethnic groups for food, for resources, for a warm sun. Someone is waiting for the non-Russians to come and bring bread and peace ???? If they come, then with a sword. And there is no conspiracy here.
  19. shpuntik
    +1
    9 February 2013 02: 41
    War is big business. Hitler is a top manager, according to his function, "the face of the company", a mouthpiece, a tribune. I believe that this is not a theory, but a simple and clear vision of the problem. "Firms" and bankers won: BOCH, SIMENS. KRUPP and the like ...
  20. 0
    9 February 2013 22: 14
    Well, the money for the Fuhrer was unfastened by the Anglo-Saxons in full ... and during the WAR they helped as much as they could, there are a lot of facts about Ford and about Dupons and others like them ... And for the election campaigns of the early 30s also unfastened .... So the stigma of entih "democrats" in the gun, sir!
  21. L. konstantin
    0
    11 February 2013 03: 06
    I didn’t even read anything! read the headline and that's it! Yes sir!
  22. 0
    11 January 2015 14: 32
    but tell me someone whose soldiers found the dead Hitler?

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"