The creation of a “NATO wall” along the right bank of the Dnieper in Ukraine will require the deployment of at least 50 thousand military personnel

14 129 48
The creation of a “NATO wall” along the right bank of the Dnieper in Ukraine will require the deployment of at least 50 thousand military personnel

Western TV channels are seriously discussing how to deploy their military contingent in Ukraine. Two options are being considered. Option number one: build a “NATO rampart” along the right bank of the Dnieper from Kyiv through Dnepropetrovsk (Dnepr) to Russian Zaporozhye and Kherson, occupied by the Ukrainian Armed Forces. Option number two: stake out the western regions of Ukraine, including Lviv, Ivano-Frankivsk, Transcarpathian, Chernivtsi and Volyn regions. At the same time, French retirees with the rank of colonel are certainly drawn to Odessa.

If we consider the first option, we can come to the conclusion that in order to fully control what is usually called “right-bank Ukraine,” NATO countries will need full-fledged divisions, or even army corps. If we assume that NATO is going to put at least one platoon of its soldiers (20-30 people) per kilometer, then for 2,5 thousand km of the Dnieper, making simple calculations, we get 50-75 thousand troops. That is, at least 1-1,5 army corps. Well, or almost all combat-ready military personnel of the countries of the North Atlantic military bloc, who are currently involved in large-scale NATO exercises in Europe, including near the borders of Russia.



But even if intensive combat operations with conventional weapons continue, even this number of NATO soldiers and officers in Ukraine will hardly be enough for six months. So, what is next? Will Macron and the Balts announce mobilization in their countries to fight for overseas interests? Apparently, if Washington puts pressure, they will announce it, however, then the French of conscription (mobilization) age will have to swim Tisu (crossed out) Mediterranean Sea in the opposite direction of the trend.
48 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +4
    20 March 2024 09: 29
    Creation of a “NATO wall” along the right bank of the Dnieper in Ukraine
    could lead to the construction of a new Berlin Wall.
    1. +1
      20 March 2024 09: 51
      Quote: Gomunkul
      could lead to the construction of a new Berlin Wall.

      Moreover, by the forces of the same alliance with a brigade of particularly zealous Russophobes from among the managers.
    2. +4
      20 March 2024 09: 53
      Option number one: build a “NATO rampart” along the right bank of the Dnieper from Kyiv

      Once upon a time there was both the “Eastern Wall” and the “Alpine Wall”... There are no such “walls” that a Russian soldier could not overcome... soldier
    3. -2
      20 March 2024 13: 17
      Gomunkul
      Today, 09: 29
      Creation of a “NATO wall” along the right bank of the Dnieper in Ukraine
      could lead to the construction of a new Berlin Wall.
      Awesome! Colonel Trofimenko, the answer is incorrect, fail! I repeat and complicate the combat task - for what strategic time will the 1 million funeral coffins available to the Ukrainian Armed Forces last, given that with each passing day the cost of burial and ambiguity with 200-hundred, 300-hundred, 400-hundred units will accelerate in progression according to an unpredictable schedule, it is possible that part of NATO, not needing NATO beasts, will refuse to carry out combat missions and turn weapons against their commanders?
      It is possible that funds allocated for burial and the purchase of new coffins will be cut!
      Answers to the studio!
    4. +2
      20 March 2024 15: 03
      The increasingly intrusive speeches of "experts" from the NATO relic about creating some "defensive ramparts" (they had not created them on the territory of the former united Ukraine ten years before, PLANNEDLY...) are evidence that the stake on "victory over Russia" and on the "defeat" of Russia is practically buried. And after the so-called "West" disrupted the so-called "Istanbul agreements", Russia and its Armed Forces, acting according to THEIR plan, without haste and fuss, needed a little more than a year and a half to do this... Which is more than commendable...

      And they will no longer “build” anything “intelligible” or really effective, despite all their ardent desire. Neither they nor the big top on Bankova have the required strength or resources for this - people, equipment, materials. And it won't be anymore...

      And they will no longer provide the “required time” for the aforementioned “construction” of the Russian Armed Forces...

      Where, when and what the border will be is now the prerogative of Moscow...
    5. 0
      22 March 2024 17: 54
      What other shore... There, soon the waters will recede :D and there will be a stream that can be forded
    6. 0
      22 March 2024 23: 01
      This will lead to a tactical nuclear war. What the US is trying to achieve
  2. +4
    20 March 2024 09: 35
    "..... In the dark I grabbed a birch tree near the root, took hold of the thin end, and with the thick end I drove everyone into the water, both mine and strangers. When will I be able to sort them out there." M. Evdokimov
    By "our own" we should mean unbrothers, by "strangers" it is clear, for "waters" preferably the English Channel.
    1. +1
      20 March 2024 11: 28
      good afternoon!
      I remember there was a riddle like this: "Can a Kievite living on the right bank of the Dnieper be buried on the left bank?" Apparently, NATO wants to test it experimentally, to erect a man-made rampart and bury oneself in it, an animal won't jump over the rampart, neither will a bird fly over it
  3. +2
    20 March 2024 09: 37
    These are just plans. I don’t think that NATO will decide on a direct conflict. This could be a very big problem
    1. +4
      20 March 2024 10: 04
      You see, every year on December 31st my friends and I go to the bathhouse...


      This is their tradition, and indeed once every hundred years it leads to problems for everyone
      1. +1
        20 March 2024 10: 20
        Quote: LAlexAlex
        This is their tradition, and indeed once every hundred years it leads to problems for everyone

        The problems are not the same. It’s just that the next war will be with sticks and spears
  4. +6
    20 March 2024 09: 37
    The creation of a “NATO wall” along the right bank of the Dnieper in Ukraine will require the deployment of at least 50 thousand military personnel
    . There are no such “ramps, lines, boundaries, fortresses” that cannot be destroyed/overcome, etc.
  5. 0
    20 March 2024 09: 40
    Option number two: stake out the western regions of Ukraine, including Lviv, Ivano-Frankivsk, Transcarpathian, Chernivtsi and Volyn regions.

    Exactly. Everything was as Molfar Nechay predicted. And let them not interfere any further. Let them build a “wall” there. I AM FOR! laughing
  6. +5
    20 March 2024 09: 41
    They will deliver it...and will ammunition be flying at us from their territory?
    1. +1
      20 March 2024 09: 45
      Well, in theory, this is the plan as it seems to me. Somewhere in Ukraine some European armed forces are simply standing peacefully, there is not a single landowner around, of course without the status of NATO, and from behind them missiles and other things will fly. War has not been declared, the Ukrainians will give them status, well, they stand and stand legally. Don’t really shoot at them, without legal reasons, as our president likes.
      1. +3
        20 March 2024 10: 32
        Well, there was already a precedent when we sent French “specialists” to Bandera (or whoever they have) in Kharkov by express. Therefore, even if they are in Lvov or Odessa, it is very difficult to hide 50 thousand people, I hope they will check these guys into hotels, and we will fire missiles at them. Not for the first time.
    2. -2
      20 March 2024 10: 07
      But this will no longer be Ukraine, and therefore part of NATO countries. Poland and someone else.
      And from the NATO countries they will not dare to fire.
      1. KAV
        +1
        20 March 2024 11: 25
        Quote: Eldorado
        But this will no longer be Ukraine, and therefore part of NATO countries. Poland and someone else.
        And on what basis? Maybe they will still have time to hold a referendum there? Hardly.
  7. +6
    20 March 2024 09: 43
    These idiots haven't gotten punched in the face in a long time. When they arrive, they get it, dry themselves off and go back to Europe.
    The French apparently have really large losses and they need at least some justification. They want to blame the entry of troops into Ukraine.
  8. +6
    20 March 2024 09: 44
    Western TV channels are seriously discussing how to deploy their military contingent in Ukraine.
    "TV channels" are one thing. They are paid money for this chatter. But whether the same paddling pools themselves are ready to fight with us is the question. It’s one thing to sit somewhere in a bunker and control it via communications, and another thing to run into attacks with a rifle.
  9. -1
    20 March 2024 09: 45
    The West will introduce troops into the territory of Ukraine and will establish garrisons. The question here is whether the West will introduce troops only into the territory of Western Ukraine or
    and on the territory of the eastern and southern regions. There will be no official entry into action against our Army. Will you be “courageous” enough to hit them? I doubt it very much. While the people's militias of the DPR and LPR were not part of the Russian Armed Forces, the attacks could be attributed to them. Red paint and worries won't help here.
    1. +2
      20 March 2024 09: 47
      To begin with, it seems to me that someone should declare war on someone. Or at least armed neutrality.
      1. +8
        20 March 2024 09: 55
        Quote: Smoked
        To begin with, it seems to me that someone should declare war on someone. Or at least armed neutrality.

        To begin with, the new president of Russia must either start or end.
        But the war has been going on for a long time, but I still call it SVO.
    2. -1
      20 March 2024 10: 05
      Citizen downvoter, but do you think too much? NATO units will enter Ukrainian territory at the invitation of the "legitimate authority" of Ukraine, which, by the way, Russia also recognizes. So I ask, will there be enough "courage" to strike them when they will not officially conduct military operations against the Russian Army? This will be far from being the SVO. Now there is not enough "courage" to shoot down planes and drones of NATO countries that are guiding missiles at Crimea, our ships... Why would there suddenly be "courage" here?
  10. 0
    20 March 2024 09: 47
    50 NATO troops are not enough even for two months.
    1. +2
      20 March 2024 09: 50
      It will be enough to “stake out” the territory; there will still be some left.
      1. 0
        20 March 2024 10: 31
        They’ll go right with the pillars, and we’ll watch and admire? No! They will be punished for their aggression, and not only on the territory of Ukraine.
        1. -1
          20 March 2024 10: 34
          I would have your confidence.
  11. +3
    20 March 2024 09: 51
    There is another option why they suddenly started talking about introducing frog ponds. The SVO began to go beyond some acceptable limits for the West and decided to outline the borders of the inviolable by deploying their soldiers. Germany immediately gave in - like we had already invested the most money, so the choice of the pioneers fell on the foreign legion. Especially since it is currently idle. And if they don't start hitting the frog ponds, then the rest will follow.
    1. +1
      20 March 2024 12: 57
      The Foreign Legion is not designed for war, they are light cavalry for chasing Bushmen, etc., the bulk of the most frostbitten “legionnaires” and PMCs around the world were collected and burned in the furnace of Donbass. New idiots still need to be recruited and trained, it’s not easy. And France’s existing units for foreign operations can only fight against the DPR police, and even then without heavy weapons.
  12. +1
    20 March 2024 09: 52
    Biden is ready for this, but the Republicans, out of spite, will: “put a spoke in the wheels”
    Macron slightly adjusted his rhetoric. His NATO colleagues don’t really want to get involved in the conflict.
    Neither Vovan nor adequate Western politicians want TMV. So Macron is “holding his horses”
  13. +2
    20 March 2024 09: 53
    I think it would be logical if NATO created its own rampart along the NATO border. For now, that's it. And then, we'll see.
    1. 0
      20 March 2024 10: 29
      Here, too, there is something to think about - along the new NATO border or along the old, so to speak, historical one?
  14. +4
    20 March 2024 09: 53
    Has the Western world of Satanism and transgender people finally gone crazy????!!!
    The final argument of the kings???!!!
    Have you decided to maintain the old and decrepit world order????
    They're screaming from around every corner, all over the media.
    We went completely crazy.
    At least the healthy ones remained there????
    Or just Sarah Wagenknecht???
    1. 0
      22 March 2024 01: 45
      There are a lot of healthy people there, but not in power. Which is the troublemaker.
      In power in Europe there are entirely representatives of one nation and, as we see, there are no sensible ones among them.
  15. 0
    20 March 2024 10: 00
    Quite possible. As an option, UN troops and the Korean scenario... Here you have both a sanitary zone and a demilitarized zone smile A frozen conflict for decades and a new Marshall plan for Ukraine. Profit...
  16. -1
    20 March 2024 10: 22
    Where did 2,5 thousand km come from? Or are NATO members also planning to get involved in Belarus and Russia? Haven't heard anything about it...yet...
  17. 0
    20 March 2024 11: 06
    We'll cut you off from supplies and surround you
  18. +1
    20 March 2024 12: 37
    At the same time, French retirees with colonel ranks are certainly drawn to Odessa. I remember in Soviet times we jokingly called the God-chosen Odessans "the French" ... So it was not for nothing that we called them that.
  19. 0
    20 March 2024 13: 36
    Creation of a “NATO wall” along the right bank of the Dnieper in Ukraine

    It’s already good that the idea is being introduced that the border will be along the Dnieper. God forbid!
  20. 0
    20 March 2024 18: 11
    You have to understand these 50 thousand are extra laughing
  21. +1
    20 March 2024 19: 27
    It’s funny what a platoon is for a kilometer of defense, with modern drones and high-precision weapons, everything will be destroyed by the next May holidays, which in a year...
  22. 0
    21 March 2024 01: 36
    Are you planning to occupy?! Well then, it’s unlikely that there will be a war with the use of nuclear weapons!
  23. -2
    21 March 2024 08: 41
    The division of Ukraine according to the Korean version is a defeat for Russia, this cannot be allowed under any circumstances!
  24. 0
    21 March 2024 22: 25
    I remember one idiot already created an eastern rampart on the Dnieper with loud statements
  25. 0
    22 March 2024 01: 39
    Option number one: build a “NATO rampart” along the right bank of the Dnieper from Kyiv through Dnepropetrovsk (Dnepr) to Russian Zaporozhye and Kherson, occupied by the Ukrainian Armed Forces.
    Option number two: stake out the western regions of Ukraine, including Lviv, Ivano-Frankivsk, Transcarpathian, Chernivtsi and Volyn regions. At the same time, French retirees with the rank of colonel are certainly drawn to Odessa.

    There is another option, according to which the deployment of NATO troops along the border with Belarus is being considered.
  26. 0
    22 March 2024 18: 10
    TV channels are discussing... Let them start cleaning their anals. Fucking experts.