Putin: Russia's development of the Avangard missile system has nullified the American missile defense system

124
Putin: Russia's development of the Avangard missile system has nullified the American missile defense system

Russia has reset the US missile defense system by developing and putting into service a new missile system with the Avangard hypersonic unit. Russian President Vladimir Putin spoke about this in an interview with Dmitry Kiselev.

The United States invested hundreds of billions of dollars in the development of a missile defense system, but the Russian Avangard missile system nullified all their investments. Moreover, the development of the complex cost Russia much less than the missile defense system for the Americans. In addition, by developing this missile system, Russia gained experience that showed how to proceed further.



If you calculate how much it cost them, say, a well-known missile defense system, yes, and one of the main components of overcoming missile defense on our side is the Avangard, an intercontinental missile, an intercontinental-range glide unit. Well, just incomparable values. And we, in fact, nullified everything they did, everything they invested in this missile defense system

- leads RIA News words of the Russian president.

The Avangard control unit is capable of flying in dense layers of the atmosphere at hypersonic speeds of up to Mach 27 (about 32 thousand km/h), maneuvering along the course and altitude, which makes the missile inaccessible to all types of missile defense.

The new Avangard missile system has already been put into service and is on combat duty. Today, the carriers of the Avangard hypersonic units are the UR-100N UTTH ICBMs; in the future, they will be carriers of the new Sarmat intercontinental missiles. It was previously reported that at the first stage, until the end of 2025, the Strategic Missile Forces will deploy two regiments with Avangards, each of which will have 6 silo-based ICBMs.
124 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. -33
    13 March 2024 09: 30
    There is no point in this if the Vanguard is not used in the war in 404. But swinging a baton without a fight doesn’t require much intelligence. Just make others laugh.
    1. +8
      13 March 2024 09: 37
      Can you tell me what or who Avangard should be used against in Ukraine...??? "Vanguard" was created as a strategic weapon against NATO... Do you propose to immediately fight with NATO or launch "Vanguards" into the Ukrainian trenches...??? It's funny when you shoot sparrows out of a cannon, and you propose the same thing... am
      1. -12
        13 March 2024 09: 44
        Make it funny when you shoot sparrows from a cannon,

        Exactly, and it’s also funny - when a wimpy intellectual, from whom the street hooligans take money for breakfast, verbally threatens the serious bandits who are protecting the entire area.
      2. The comment was deleted.
        1. -12
          13 March 2024 10: 33
          “We don’t know what the effectiveness of the Vanguard is.” ///
          ----
          1. It is impossible to shoot him down - this is true.
          2. It is impossible for them to hit the object - this is also true.

          There will be a powerful nuclear explosion in the United States.
          But where? - neither those who send it nor those who
          who meets him.
          Joker, in short.
          1. -2
            13 March 2024 10: 44
            There will be a powerful nuclear explosion in the United States. But where?
            In the states)) hi
          2. -3
            13 March 2024 20: 28
            1. Did someone try to shoot him down? Any confirmed data from the enemy?
            2. If it is impossible to get into an object, then why is it needed? Hit the squares like Grad?
        2. +8
          13 March 2024 11: 05
          The citizen should be reminded that respected or not very respected people debate at VO. You are confused with dog teams, this is not a kennel, and therefore, you cannot be classified as either the first or the second audience, since you are in a kennel, not in VO, this is not your contingent for communication.
          1. -4
            13 March 2024 20: 30
            Pfft. Pathetic attempt to not execute the command fas)
        3. 0
          13 March 2024 14: 15
          Do you know the effectiveness of the Minutemen and Tridents? For a minute, these military rarities are 60 years old. And the fact that we went crazy is why we have SVO today.
        4. +2
          13 March 2024 16: 00
          Quote: Lomaster
          Minusers, fas! Put a minus!

          Oh, another woodpecker has arrived who considers himself a dog handler!!!
          1. -4
            13 March 2024 20: 31
            I’m not a dog trainer, but I teach the front command.
        5. -4
          13 March 2024 20: 26
          Oh, how the grief-stricken patriots flocked. As many as 24 minuses! ) The front team did a great job! I will continue to train you!
          1. The comment was deleted.
          2. +1
            13 March 2024 23: 44
            Quote: Lomaster
            Oh, how the grief-stricken patriots flocked. As many as 24 minuses! ) The front team did a great job! I will continue to train you!

            Poor quality manure is immediately visible. that's why they don't take it. Even when the seller pretends to be a drizzler.
    2. -7
      13 March 2024 09: 38
      reset the American missile defense system. What's the point? This is already the second reset, so 2:0 in our favor!
      1. +5
        13 March 2024 09: 46
        reset the American missile defense system. What's the point? This is already the second reset
        He understands zeroing)
    3. +6
      13 March 2024 09: 41
      Due to the fact that we have something to kill, they didn’t kill us on February 25, 2022. NATO has a colossal advantage at sea and in the air.
      1. -6
        13 March 2024 09: 48
        NATO has a colossal advantage at sea and in the air.
        As practice has shown, there is no point in seriously discussing such statements from him.
      2. -16
        13 March 2024 09: 54
        If we didn’t have something to burn with, we wouldn’t have gone anywhere on February 24th. Is there anything to counter?
        1. -4
          13 March 2024 11: 21
          If we didn’t have something to burn with, we wouldn’t have gone anywhere on February 24th.
          We climbed up without normal communication, without navigation... without understanding the situation/circumstances. So are you surprised by anything else?
        2. GIS
          +4
          13 March 2024 11: 49
          Naturally, all possible and impossible options were calculated. It’s not for nothing that the GDP said that the triad was put on alert. this was precisely what was said to those who were already rubbing their paws to introduce all sorts of “peacemakers”, organize a no-fly zone and everything else that distinguished them in Yugoslavia
          1. -2
            13 March 2024 12: 05
            Quote: GIS
            It’s not for nothing that the GDP said that the triad was put on alert.

            Well, how can I say... the Strategic Missile Forces, for example, don’t need to be brought to the battlefield, they never leave it... just like nuclear submarines in the ocean... I don’t know about the Air Force about the battlefield, but in theory they should bring missile launchers with nuclear warheads to the planes , but I don’t think they did it - the Northern Military District did not start with a nuclear power ... so he said it in vain (for the sake of words) ... everything was already in combat readiness - no one was brought anywhere additional and everyone in the West knew about it even without his statements...
            1. +7
              13 March 2024 13: 06
              The Strategic Missile Forces, for example, don’t need to be brought into the BG, they never leave it..

              Not certainly in that way. The Strategic Missile Forces have several levels of combat readiness. Every day they are on duty in constant combat readiness. As the situation escalates, higher levels of alert may be introduced. In a nutshell, the transition to a higher level of combat readiness involves a number of measures that reduce the time from the arrival of the order to “launch” to the launch itself.
              1. +2
                13 March 2024 13: 49
                Quote: Poplar
                Not certainly in that way. The Strategic Missile Forces have several levels of combat readiness. Every day they are on duty in constant combat readiness. As the situation escalates, higher levels of alert may be introduced. In a nutshell, the transition to a higher level of combat readiness involves a number of measures that reduce the time from the arrival of the order to “launch” to the launch itself.

                well, it’s like I was sitting at the controls back in the day and I know it all wink There is a nuance compared to other troops - what else should we have done when transferring to higher levels of combat forces while sitting at the control panel - put on gas masks or camouflage our faces? yes, additional measures are being carried out that are not related to the ability to carry out a launch... but I said - specifically in relation to GDP, what he said about are on alert, the logical question is, what, they weren’t in the BG - i.e. Was I wrong about something?
                1. 0
                  13 March 2024 14: 30
                  Colleague, it seems to me that you are finding fault with the words of GDP. Perhaps this was, so to speak, a populist statement, or perhaps it was actually a transfer to an increased degree of BG. I’ve been retired for a long time, so I can’t say whether something was real or not.
                  1. 0
                    13 March 2024 14: 43
                    Quote: Poplar
                    Colleague, it seems to me that you are finding fault with the words of GDP. Perhaps this was, so to speak, a populist statement, or perhaps it was actually a transfer to an increased degree of BG. I’ve been retired for a long time, so I can’t say whether something was real or not.

                    Well, maybe I’m being picky, although it seems like he didn’t say anything about raises, colleague. By the way, on the nuclear submarines there are increased rates, interesting? hi
                    1. 0
                      13 March 2024 15: 04
                      In general, logically there should be. Perhaps some kind of subsuming, maybe a stop, some modes are probably being driven out. A rocket is not an AK, from which you can shoot while running.
                      1. +1
                        13 March 2024 15: 09
                        So they don’t have much of a constant connection - SDV, but that’s not it.. and the patrol areas are already combat, when commanded to launch, they just surface and fire.. in theory.. well.. maybe one of the comrades will explain ..
                    2. +3
                      14 March 2024 02: 57
                      Quote: Level 2 Advisor
                      By the way, on the nuclear submarines there are increased rates, interesting?

                      Quote: Poplar
                      Perhaps some kind of subsuming, maybe a stop, some modes are probably being driven out.

                      Quote: Level 2 Advisor
                      There’s not much constant communication - SDV, but that’s not it... and the patrol areas are already combat, when the launch command is given, they simply surface and fire.

                      Two words, with admission to the 1st department, without disclosing the SSGT.
                      1. The RF Armed Forces have established 4 degrees of disease: constant, increased, military danger and complete. For each of them, a set of measures is being carried out to transfer forces to the established BG.
                      2. APRK SN (RPK SN) as part of strategic nuclear forces (triad) can also be located in any of these warheads. At the same time, they can be in the PB, at the transition to the ROP, patrolling in the ROP.
                      3. Boats of the 1st line with a “corresponding” BG become available for loading SLBMs, missiles with SBP and other weapons, replenish variable supplies (Food, water, diesel fuel for diesel generators, etc. - regeneration cassettes, cylinders, etc.) and go to areas of dispersal. Commanders receive instructions, packages (check availability), communication documents, etc.
                      4. Upon receipt of the order, the unit goes to sea. The missile system has been operating since its release, while the BIUS (ASBU) is working to generate firing data. One car nah. in hot mode and controls (duplicates) data for firing from the 1st vehicle.
                      5. Each boat receives a communication program. It is installed by the control center through the coastal control system (zonal) one-way, without acknowledgment. Reception of BU (SBU) signals is carried out on a released (towed) VSD antenna in accordance with the communication program (mode --12, 8, 4 hours, continuous) RDO is obtained on the antenna up to 10 m, from space via a laser channel up to 150 m (not verified).
                      6. Before launching, the boat is switched to continuous mode. This is one of the signs of “seriousness of intentions”. Upon receipt of an order for a BC missile attack, its authenticity is checked: the frequency at which the SBU arrived, distinctive groups, etc. The commander and ZAM (SPK?) open the safe, take out combat control packages with 1/2 of the code for unlocking the SBP. The SPC confirms the accuracy of the frequency. Manipulations (I won’t say which ones), we get the CODE.
                      7. Kr announces: - combat alert, missile attack. Mines No.... The code is entered into the Administration of the Republic of Kazakhstan. The boat occupies a “firing corridor” (H=up to 45m, V=up to 5kt), sea up to 8 points. Firing data (I won’t say what) is entered into the BIUS. Pre-launch preparations begin. Operators monitor work using a scoreboard. With the production of P-D, etc., when ready - start: series, full, interval 9-10 seconds.
                      Very schematically, in general terms, without secrets.
                      1. +1
                        14 March 2024 09: 57
                        thank you very much, Alexander! it was always interesting.. in general, the algorithm is similar to the Strategic Missile Forces.. with special naval nuances, of course.. loading, exiting, communication - it’s naturally simpler for us.. at the mines, almost nothing changes at all.. and the remote control is also with 2 Do you use the keys or does the start itself take place differently? smile
                      2. +1
                        14 March 2024 14: 57
                        Quote: Level 2 Advisor
                        The remote control also has 2 keys or is the start itself different?

                        In my presence, after the code locks were removed and the firing data was generated, the “Start Allowed” sign lit up. KBC-2 turned the key, KEP pressed the button. After 10 seconds the product left. The boatswain took control of the boat, the mech reported on the systems... Everything was as usual.
                      3. +1
                        14 March 2024 15: 06
                        Quote: Boa constrictor KAA
                        In front of me, after the code locks were removed and the firing data was generated, the “Start OK” sign lit up. KBC-2 turned the key, KEP pressed the button. After 10 seconds the product left. The boatswain took control of the boat, the mech reported on the systems... Everything was as usual.

                        thank you, satisfied my curiosity hi in the Strategic Missile Forces - PR, select the launcher and two simultaneously turn the keys, then the button at the KDS .. but.. there were only two (three) of us at the remote control and this was so that no one would launch the product alone - protection (one of).. I don’t remember distance, but you won’t be able to reach 2 keys at once.. and in the State Command Command of the nuclear submarine - as I understand it, there are noticeably more people and this question is not worth it..
                      4. +1
                        14 March 2024 15: 19
                        Quote: Level 2 Advisor
                        and in the State Control Committee of the Nuclear Power Plant - as I understand it, there are noticeably more people and this question does not arise..

                        the entire crew according to their BP, according to BG No. 1 (combat alert). The combat (staffing) schedule for the production of RS is in effect. Everyone is on their own BC/CP. KBR-r works, but the whole crew shoots!
                        Somehow it was like that. Yeah.
                2. -1
                  13 March 2024 20: 39
                  That's what I'm talking about. Ridiculous statements. A database is a database. Be ready to carry out a combat mission at any time.
              2. -1
                13 March 2024 20: 37
                Did you serve in the Strategic Missile Forces or are you speaking from rumors?
            2. -1
              13 March 2024 20: 36
              Anyone who has not served in the air defense and strategic missile forces does not know what combat duty is. The military commander did not serve there. Hence the ridiculous statements. For the uninitiated, I’ll explain. In a group of two divisions, one of them takes up a month-long combat duty. The second one is doing routine maintenance at this time. After a month they change places. So the air defense and strategic missile forces are on the database around the clock and all year round.
              1. +1
                14 March 2024 00: 38
                In a group of two divisions, one of them takes up a month-long combat duty. The second one is doing routine maintenance at this time. After a month they change places.

                What troops are we talking about? What kind of combat unit is a group of divisions? Where did you serve? Or so, according to rumors?
                1. 0
                  14 March 2024 10: 04
                  Quote: Poplar
                  What troops are we talking about? What kind of combat unit is a group of divisions? Where did you serve? Or so, according to rumors?

                  I agree - which group of divisions? maybe he's talking about air defense?
                  1. The comment was deleted.
      3. +1
        13 March 2024 14: 00
        NATO at sea has +100 targets for our Onyx and Zircon anti-ship missiles with Bastion anti-ship missiles - that's YES laughing
        so we can sink +500 targets only in the Baltic laughing
        NATO in the air
        1. NATO planes will have nowhere to return after an Iskander OTRK salvo at NATO AB
        laughing
        2. Aerospace Forces and Air Defense reset the entire NATO fighter fleet another 800 km from our borders
        laughing
        3. Europe i.e. all NATO countries will become a radioactive exclusion zone
        laughing
        1. -2
          13 March 2024 20: 41
          Is this sarcasm or what? To put it mildly... Ecstasy of a grief-patriot?
      4. +1
        13 March 2024 14: 19
        In fact, this “advantage” is quite controversial, even in conventional weapons!
      5. -2
        13 March 2024 14: 59
        fisherman, they didn’t have a goal to kill us, but the goal was to draw us into what we now have and they feel great watching the battles on the outskirts
        1. -1
          13 March 2024 20: 43
          But this is the truth. Which is impossible not to recognize due to objectivity and givenness.
    4. -12
      13 March 2024 10: 02
      Disannance, yeah.
      That is, no natys with their pros were no longer threatening...
      um
      1. -20
        13 March 2024 10: 08
        Who was threatened? If NATO has been in the Baltic states for 25 years. Whichever is closer. But why don't we bomb the Tribalts? Or now Finland and Sweden? Ass?
        1. +7
          13 March 2024 10: 57
          We don't need tribalists.
          Tribalt has nothing to do with Russian, he is a Protestant, writes in Latin, and besides, he does not like Russia and never has.
          That's why they don't interest us. Just like the Finns and Swedes. Territorial claims in both directions, no more. Well, or as a strategically important territory during the Big Batch.
          But Ukraine with Kiev, the mother of Russian cities, is a completely different matter, consider it part of our Russia. And we will not give ours to anyone.
          1. -16
            13 March 2024 11: 07
            Arguments based on the propagandist template. They gave away 404 a long time ago. If it weren’t for the stupid Maidan, the lock-jaws would have quietly scrapped the agreement on the Black Sea Fleet, and by now NATO peace ships would be standing there peacefully. And we would have nothing to answer.
            1. GIS
              +2
              13 March 2024 11: 52
              the big haired ones would have quietly scrapped the agreement on the Black Sea Fleet, and now NATO peace ships would be standing there peacefully
              This is exactly what would have been the “trigger” if there had been no Maidan. answer with something - you yourself admitted it, it already was and is something
              1. -2
                13 March 2024 20: 44
                How to answer? And to whom? If we were just pushed out of there. Termination of the contract.
            2. 0
              13 March 2024 12: 52
              Without the Maidan, it was apparently impossible to install a radically pro-Western government. Half-Ukraine consistently supported pro-Russian parties.
              1. -1
                13 March 2024 20: 45
                Which pro-Russian parties? Can I have their names and programs? Why are they pro-Russian?
            3. +2
              14 March 2024 00: 34
              Quote: Lomaster
              by now there would be peaceful NATO ships standing there peacefully.
              Yes, my friend, you are very sweet... Yes, sir! (With)
              Stick your wet dreams in a known place. Where did you find "peaceful" NATO ships? You probably firmly believe that NATO is a peaceful bloc, white and fluffy! Such a dove of peace. Maybe you remember who bombed the SFRY, Libya, Iraq, Syria? Or is it all an invention of the damned Russians.
        2. +4
          13 March 2024 11: 07
          You have some strange perception of threat.
          Those. the person standing next to you, who previously declared you a goat and promised to mutilate you, tries to hit you on the head, estimates how long the club should be, who called for help a couple more like him with axes - this is not a threat to your health???
          1. -3
            13 March 2024 20: 47
            The Balts have long called and threatened. Why don't we beat them?
        3. -3
          13 March 2024 20: 42
          Ahaha! 17 downvoters, but do you have anything to object to on the merits?
    5. +1
      13 March 2024 10: 58
      There is no point in this if the Vanguard is not used in the war in 404. But swinging a baton without a fight doesn’t require much intelligence. Just make others laugh.

      By presenting such claims, you should immediately present them to the United States.
      By the way, they have not yet used their system and its effectiveness is unknown to anyone.
      So in this regard, we have complete parity with the United States, and for me it is better that we and they do not move from verbal threats and warnings to using them.
      I really don’t want this. hi
      1. -15
        13 March 2024 11: 10
        Well, no one knocks their shoe every other day or remembers Kuzka’s mother. It’s the fashion of our general secretaries to boast about the Tsar Cannons. In fact, we are the ones threatening them. I haven’t heard a single thunderstorm even from this self-propelled grandfather about their analogues of nuclear missiles and bombs. And ours keeps talking about it every other day.
        1. +5
          13 March 2024 11: 25
          You simply forgot the threats of our neighbors and “partners”. Here they are:
          ...When Crimea returned to Russia in 2014, the first overt hints came from Ukraine. Millions then heard a recording of a telephone conversation between ex-Prime Minister of Ukraine Yulia Tymoshenko and former First Deputy Secretary of the National Security and Defense Council of the country Nestor Shufrich. In pure Russian they discussed the situation. At first, the “orange princess” was simply excited: “I myself am ready to take the machine gun and go shoot.” And then she slashed from the shoulder: “I hope that I will turn on all my connections, and I will raise the whole world as soon as I can, so that, damn it, there won’t even be a scorched field left from this Russia!” - she said. “Damn, they should be shot with atomic weapons.”...


          After the start of the special operation, nuclear threats to Russia began to pour in intensively. Already on February 25, French Foreign Minister Jean-Yves Le Drian told the media that NATO has its own nuclear arsenal, and Putin must understand this. By the way, it was then that he let slip: “Putin, while fighting with NATO...”.


          At the end of June, German Air Force Commander Ingo Gerhartz clearly stated that there is a determination to use nuclear weapons against Russia, and at the same time called on NATO to prepare for this in advance. “For credible deterrence, we need both the means of destruction and the political will to implement nuclear deterrence if necessary,” the general said.


          There are also similar statements from Poland, Great Britain and other NATO countries, so don’t rely on V.V. To slander Putin, out of habit, he only responds to threats. Yes
          1. GIS
            +1
            13 March 2024 11: 54
            I agree 100% with everything you said
          2. -2
            13 March 2024 20: 49
            Before 2014 and before February 24, were there such threats?
        2. -1
          13 March 2024 20: 47
          12 minusers, do you have anything to object to on the merits?
    6. -1
      13 March 2024 12: 11
      To break is not to build, and to build is not to break, just like the origin of the nickname!
      Victory will definitely be ours!
      Bandera and other Nazis will not let you lie!
    7. -1
      13 March 2024 20: 29
      Heartbreaking patriots, why are there so few downsides? They poked your face into the truth!
  2. +2
    13 March 2024 09: 30
    This is very good strategically! The fact that NATO does not attack is what holds them back. But now there is a hybrid war, where NATO is fighting with someone else’s hands against the Russian Federation.
    1. +3
      13 March 2024 09: 39
      Our nuclear baton is better and more effective than NATO’s and the hegemon doesn’t like it. He knows that he will get it in full.
      1. -18
        13 March 2024 09: 56
        What's better? What is more effective? Or do their Minutemen and Pershings shoot dandelions?
        1. +4
          13 March 2024 10: 02
          The enemy's air defense cannot be guaranteed to intercept our strike weapons in response to aggression, therefore it is effective. The cost in monetary terms is less, therefore it is better.
          1. -9
            13 March 2024 10: 06
            But our air defense seems to be able to. These are all fairy tales for turbo-patriots. But when hundreds of Minutemen fly from European territory, no amount of air defense will be able to cope. You and I will be thrilled to see how many of our missiles will reach Washington.
            1. +10
              13 March 2024 10: 12
              Everyone knows about this, which is why they don’t use this option of attack. That’s why we exist. We are not Hiroshima and Nagasaki. If we didn’t have Ya.O. We’ve been gone for a long time. It’s strange that I need to explain this.
            2. +3
              13 March 2024 10: 27
              There are no Minutemen in Europe.
              1. -10
                13 March 2024 10: 29
                There are a lot of things on submarines. It's a matter of fact.
                1. +2
                  13 March 2024 12: 58
                  On submarines there is, but Trident.
            3. +1
              13 March 2024 12: 16
              Yours is a hut on the edge or how to understand? Yours in which direction, yours personally?
            4. +1
              13 March 2024 13: 36
              Piggy, where are the Minutemen from in Gaytown? Have you eaten too much lard, Taras? Minuteman is an exclusively silo-based solid-fuel ICBM and these silos are located only on the territory of the thane! The Geyropka has free-falling B61 ​​bombs and Trident-2 SLBMs (submarine ballistic missiles), and some missiles from the paddling pools. So, sweetheart, calm down and go to the trailer with your brother, he will love you)))
              1. -2
                13 March 2024 20: 52
                Piggy is just you. Because we are just as besotted by the propaganda of famous birds as the forelocks are by the propaganda of the Zefuhrer.
            5. +1
              13 March 2024 14: 02
              There are only 4,5 hundred Minutemen and all of them are in the United States. In Europe there are only bombs and missile launchers, plus SSBNs from France, Britain and the Pindos. Of course, there are quite a few of them, but we also have something in store - the adversaries will not find enough. Yes, of course, I don’t want to die in the prime of my life, but if I have to, so well...
              And your comment very much looks like hysteria.
            6. +1
              14 March 2024 00: 50
              Quote: Lomaster
              when hundreds of Minutemen will fly from Europe

              Never: - They simply aren’t there! It’s a shame to be so gray, but to boast about the originality of posts on issues of big politics and war...
        2. +1
          14 March 2024 00: 47
          Quote: Lomaster
          Or do their Minutemen and Pershings shoot dandelions?

          Pershings have long been withdrawn from service, so they probably shoot with dandelions. The Minutemen are ending their days. There have already been 4 unsuccessful test launches recently. Therefore - failure. negative
    2. -20
      13 March 2024 09: 55
      But it does not provide a tactical advantage. Then why swing that baton at all?
      1. GIS
        +1
        13 March 2024 11: 56
        so that there is no temptation to push Biden’s grandfather to press the button: grandfather is old - he doesn’t care
        1. 0
          13 March 2024 12: 20
          Grandfather Dementy doesn’t get to the sartir himself, but are you talking about the button?
          His grandchildren don’t even allow him to play the game, so that they don’t forget who he is?
          A year or two ago, Bes or X r misled him and called him at a journalistic conference
          Prezik - smoked in his or not his team, but often flashing nearby Harris!
          1. -1
            13 March 2024 20: 53
            Do not write me anymore. I don’t understand your nonsense and I don’t intend to understand. Look for people like you.
  3. 9PA
    -17
    13 March 2024 09: 33
    NATO LET'S FINALLY FIGHT AND DECIDE WHO WILL STAY TO LIVE AND WHO WILL DIE
    1. -4
      13 March 2024 09: 35
      Everyone will die. Both Russia and the West.
      If you really want to find out as soon as possible which religion is right, then go for a contract and go to the SVO. I don’t want to go to the next world at all.
      1. Msi
        +6
        13 March 2024 09: 45
        I don’t want to go to the next world at all.

        I want to disappoint you... We will all be there...
        1. -4
          13 March 2024 09: 49
          Who can argue? But it’s one thing to die in old age. It’s another thing to die for the ambitions of a bunch of grandfathers.
          1. Msi
            +4
            13 March 2024 09: 50
            But it's one thing to die in old age

            You are wrong... And who guarantees you that you will die in old age?
  4. +4
    13 March 2024 09: 33
    It is of course very good that there is Avangard.
    Thank you very much the designers did their best. May God grant the madmen in the West to stop.
    This is a warning to them.
    Otherwise there will be no civilization on Earth.
  5. 0
    13 March 2024 09: 33
    If you turn to American sources on testing their missile defense, it’s a very interesting situation. A missile defense test in “panic conditions”, a warhead from an MRBM is driven by two radars that are located behind the US coastline at sea and transmit its coordinates to an “interceptor”, which is sometimes hit by a kinetic strike , and sometimes not. There was never a salvo strike for testing.
    1. -3
      13 March 2024 09: 35
      Quote: tralflot1832
      If you turn to American sources on testing their missile defense, it’s a very interesting situation. A missile defense test in “panic conditions”, a warhead from an MRBM is driven by two radars that are located behind the US coastline at sea and transmit its coordinates to an “interceptor”, which is sometimes hit by a kinetic strike , and sometimes not. There was never a salvo strike for testing.

      Because no one ever planned to intercept a massive strike there. Because it is astronomically expensive and difficult even for the USA. All missile defense has always revolved around single missiles or primitive missiles from Iran and the DPRK.
      1. 0
        13 March 2024 09: 38
        The US missile defense interceptor missile is an ideal BRMSD, just replace the warhead with a nuclear warhead. Only the blind can’t see it.
        1. 0
          13 March 2024 10: 18
          For the US missile defense system to work, the “blank” flying in space must fly between two American stations monitoring the parameters of the ballistic trajectory (at sea or land), otherwise the missile defense system is useless.
      2. +5
        13 March 2024 09: 47
        Quote: BlackMokona
        Because no one ever planned to intercept a massive strike there. Because it is astronomically expensive and difficult even for the USA. All missile defense has always revolved around single missiles or primitive missiles from Iran and the DPRK.

        They have always planned a treacherous sudden disarming strike on us, after which there will be five or ten missiles left that they can intercept! That's all. Unscrupulous greedy brutes, that’s all that can be said about the “elites” of the West, who must be denazified if we want our civilization to live.
        1. +2
          13 March 2024 10: 52
          Unscrupulous greedy brutes, that’s all that can be said about the “elites” of the West, who need to be denazified

          Their missile defense calculation is based on the concept of “acceptable damage.” That is, they cover really important strategic objects and critical infrastructure, and they don’t feel sorry for the population, including cities with a population of over a million. Well, they will have less gays, feminists, drug addicts and bandits of color - that’s good. And so - yes, all hope is for a preventive strike on our strategic nuclear forces from the operational-tactical zone, weakening the retaliatory strike.
      3. Msi
        +6
        13 March 2024 09: 48
        All missile defense has always revolved around single missiles or primitive missiles from Iran and the DPRK.
        let's clarify... This is a calculation for the first disarming strike on Russia, then what will take off and try to shoot down... If something falls, it will not be shot down, acceptable damage...
        1. -3
          13 March 2024 10: 04
          Quote from Msi
          let's clarify... This is a calculation for the first disarming strike on Russia, then what will take off and try to shoot down... If something falls, it will not be shot down, acceptable damage...

          And how are you planning to make this disarming blow? Who will turn off all our early warning systems first? Will he hand over the locations of all nuclear submarines and mobile complexes? Yes, all this at once and in real time?
          And if there is this someone. Isn’t the level of infiltration already so high that one can say that the country has been captured?
          1. Msi
            +2
            13 March 2024 10: 07
            Who will turn off all our early warning systems first?

            What are you about? Are you from Israel...
            And if there is this someone.

            It's impossible to communicate with you normally...
            1. -5
              13 March 2024 10: 14
              Quote from Msi
              What are you about?.

              Missile attack warning system (MAWS)

              It's surprising that you don't know the basics. winked
          2. -1
            13 March 2024 14: 46
            Quote: BlackMokona
            Quote from Msi
            let's clarify... This is a calculation for the first disarming strike on Russia, then what will take off and try to shoot down... If something falls, it will not be shot down, acceptable damage...

            And how are you planning to make this disarming blow? Who will turn off all our early warning systems first? Will he hand over the locations of all nuclear submarines and mobile complexes? Yes, all this at once and in real time?
            And if there is this someone. Isn’t the level of infiltration already so high that one can say that the country has been captured?

            If they could, they would have struck already and wouldn’t have hesitated for a second! This is why the triad was created, thanks to Lavrenty Pavlovich and Joseph Vissarionovich.
  6. The comment was deleted.
    1. The comment was deleted.
  7. The comment was deleted.
  8. 9PA
    -3
    13 March 2024 09: 42
    Quote: Gankutsu_
    Everyone will die. Both Russia and the West.
    If you really want to find out as soon as possible which religion is right, then go for a contract and go to the SVO. I don’t want to go to the next world at all.

    So it was said that they will all die and we will go to heaven. If you don’t want to die and for your children to die, go and fight against Matvienko, Rogozin and other uneducated lumpen. Fight for Russian microelectronics, fight for the Russian fleet and Russian industry. No? I don’t either, and I prefer a terrible ending to endless horror.
  9. +3
    13 March 2024 09: 48
    It’s good that we have such a club, but it’s bad that the situation has again descended into such a confrontation.
    1. 0
      13 March 2024 13: 07
      Perhaps the situation has never changed. We just temporarily lowered the club, so we received several sensitive blows.
  10. VB
    0
    13 March 2024 09: 51
    The Americans are confident that the current ruler and his entourage, ministers, officials, will never dare to use it, so everything, missiles, planes and troops will go to waste. The shelling of Russia is every day and is increasing. But in Kyiv everything is fine, gasoline, gas, electricity. Isn’t it time to turn Ukraine into ruin in the literal sense? Yes, the wrong leader went.
    1. -4
      13 March 2024 10: 10
      It's painfully true... What can I do?
    2. +1
      13 March 2024 13: 16
      However, so that Ukraine does not turn into a constant threat, from where NATO weapons will be directed at us, it must not be destroyed, but captured.
      And the West is not against handing over a destroyed country to us if victory is impossible.
  11. +5
    13 March 2024 09: 53
    From the point of view of the country's military-technical development, Russia is ready for a nuclear war.©GDP
    Russia is not to blame for anything, it is the West that has gone crazy.
    We didn’t aggravate, they didn’t hear us and didn’t want to hear us
    1. -8
      13 March 2024 10: 11
      Are you ready for nuclear war? Do you have any idea what this is? The tops have bunkers. And you?
      1. 0
        13 March 2024 10: 45
        Quote: Lomaster
        Are you ready for nuclear war? Do you have any idea what this is? The tops have bunkers. And you?

        And you ? You yourself called above...provocateur.
        1. +2
          13 March 2024 12: 55
          He is an inveterate sissy, changes nicknames and provokes people to the point of ban, don’t pay attention to him
          pay attention, he'll die faster
        2. -1
          13 March 2024 20: 59
          I already have my way. Ready to die. If necessary for the homeland. I did not call for a nuclear strike. I called and call only to destroy the Ukrainian Reich up to the Polish border. But without tiao. Because these are our lands. And destroy with all your might, and not with palm strikes. Destroy the Zefuhrer and his clique. Don't seek negotiations with him. Destroy all Ukronazism. And not by cultivating Russophobia on the Russian lands of Little Russia. And not what you came up with for yourself.
      2. +1
        13 March 2024 11: 08
        your activity on VO and negativity towards our Strategic Missile Forces is very suspicious. It is clear that you don’t know anything, it is obvious that you appear to be what you are. Turn down the bile....they would throw slippers at me on a bench in the yard.
        1. -1
          13 March 2024 21: 00
          I don't care what anyone thinks in the yard. I say what I think.
  12. -4
    13 March 2024 10: 05
    good topic)) we should also put the bubuka on the ban and update the chemical and biological ones, I don’t understand at all the talk about inhumanity with rays, does one suffer more easily than from a neuroparalytic? As for the biological, it’s just an example of peace-lovingness, you can treat it by simply temporarily incapacitating a living person enemy strength
  13. -2
    13 March 2024 10: 13
    The question is that the West is fighting for food and we are fighting for life, but to create conditions under which we do not use nuclear weapons but will be forced to fight, he, alas, will be able to stretch it out in any time, and give people and weapons. For such a war with the entire rich world, so to speak, we do not have the resources or people. Imagine, in the next half a year they will knock out all the oil refining....then the power plants....In Ukraine, everyone already cares....Ukraine or death...it’s time for us to start something. I don’t know what, to whom and who... like Vysotsky... The giraffe is bigger, he knows better.
  14. -3
    13 March 2024 10: 14
    It was previously reported that at the first stage, until the end of 2025, the Strategic Missile Forces will deploy two regiments with Avangards, each of which will have 6 silo-based ICBMs.

    Thus it turns out that
    1. Our current strategic warheads are not capable of reliably penetrating the American missile defense system
    2. More reliable warheads will appear only in two years and in quantities of only 12 pieces.
    3. And until they appear, Russia will try to play for time and continue to wage the war in a sluggish mode, not paying attention to the escalation on the part of the enemy.
    1. +2
      14 March 2024 01: 27
      Quote: km-21
      Thus it turns out that

      I'll disappoint you:
      1. our ICBMs and SLBMs carry a whole complex of SP missile defense systems and maneuvering ICBMs, so they still overcome civilian missile defense systems.
      2. our warheads are reliable and maneuverable. The R-28 will carry not one, but three 15YU-71 type BBs, so there will be not 12, but 36 BBs, guaranteed to hit the designated targets.
      3. Regarding the completion of the SVO VV, Putin gave comprehensive answers. Nothing to add. But it will all end on our terms.
      AHA.
  15. HAM
    +2
    13 March 2024 10: 31
    Judging by some of the comments on VO, victims of the Unified State Exam practically did not distinguish between tactical and strategic steps and goals... many of us remember how we bought into Reagan's "star wars". .....
  16. 0
    13 March 2024 10: 47
    The West acts with the hands of others, which we now see in our own fields, so the West does not need to act on its own.
  17. -2
    13 March 2024 10: 50
    Can Zelensky and his gang be tested? Of course, in a humane, non-nuclear manner. After this it would be easier to negotiate.
  18. The comment was deleted.
    1. The comment was deleted.
  19. +3
    13 March 2024 11: 59
    Quote: Lomaster
    Arguments based on the propagandist template. They gave away 404 a long time ago. If it weren’t for the stupid Maidan, the lock-jaws would have quietly scrapped the agreement on the Black Sea Fleet, and by now NATO peace ships would be standing there peacefully. And we would have nothing to answer.

    Grosso-specialist's arguments - "if only and if only"
  20. bbb
    -2
    13 March 2024 13: 05
    All that remains is to throw this thing at some uninhabited island not very far from the United States, or, for example, at Antarctica, in order to sober up our Western “partners” a little.
    1. 0
      14 March 2024 01: 32
      Lord, why didn’t you like Antarctica? This is, after all, a nuclear-free zone, a “m-reserve”! laughing
  21. 0
    13 March 2024 16: 21
    Quote: Lomaster
    Who was threatened? If NATO has been in the Baltic states for 25 years. Whichever is closer. But why don't we bomb the Tribalts? Or now Finland and Sweden? Ass?

    How long is the border with Ukraine? What about Finland? What about Sweden? Ass?
    1. -1
      13 March 2024 21: 05
      What does the length of the border have to do with it? When the leader’s angry speeches spoke about 500 km to Moscow from Kharkov. From the Tribalts there are less than 500. From the Finns in general there are less than 200. That is, this is a guaranteed destruction of the capital by means of Tiao. Why aren't we bombing them yet?
  22. 0
    14 March 2024 13: 20
    Armata was also a supertank before the SVO. It would be better if they bought 10 Chinese drones instead of each armature. In March 000, there would be three for each Ukrainian fighter.