More madness. Premonition of a big war

89
More madness. Premonition of a big war


The enemy ups the ante


French President Emmanuel Macron, speaking after the summit to support Ukraine in Paris on February 26, allowed a scenario in which NATO countries could send troops there in the future to fight against Russia.



“Today there is no consensus on sending troops on the ground in an official, accepted and approved manner. But nothing can be ruled out in dynamics,”

- said Macron.

As the head of France noted, “many people today say “never” (It is impossible to allow troops to be sent to Ukraine. – Author’s note), in 2022, they excluded the possibility of supplying artillery to Kyiv, tanks, long-range missiles, helicopters and airplanes. And now it’s reality.”

From Macron's perspective, Ukraine's allies are "often 6 to 12 months late" in providing aid. The President believes that each EU country can send troops to Ukraine independently, since all its states have their own armed forces. Macron also promised to "do everything to ensure that Russia could not win this war."

Naturally, after Macron’s loud words, a number of other Western leaders rejected the possibility of such a scenario. NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg said that the military bloc does not plan to send troops to Ukraine. German Chancellor Olaf Scholz also rejected this possibility.

Biden has made it clear that the United States will not send troops to Ukraine. Everything is clear here. Washington uses others to achieve its goals.

Firstly, the conflict worsens the overall military and economic situation of Ukraine, the Russian Federation and the EU, the United States benefits. In particular, almost all mutually beneficial economic and technological ties between the Russian Federation and Western Europe have been interrupted. The United States captured part of the European gas market, which Russia lost.

The EU, as the main competitor of the United States in the transition to a new technological order, has received many problems. They need to support Ukraine, increase their military capabilities, and spend time and resources on this. The United States, as an “island of stability and security,” receives an influx of capital and brains—engineering and technical personnel. Production is also being transferred to America. Accordingly, the American empire has a better chance of being the first to make the transition to a new technological structure, leaving its main competitors – the EU and China – far behind.

Secondly, why should Americans fight if others do it for them?

The role of the main cannon fodder is played by Little Russians-Ukrainians. There are still enough of them. Then you can also involve the Young Europeans, again exposing the Germans, Finns, Swedes, etc. to attack. Plus, the United States is gradually abandoning the role of the main sponsor of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, giving this honorable role to the EU.


Readiness for unrest in the USA


The Europeans are entrusted with the mission of containing Russia while the United States solves the problem of transition to a new world order. At the same time, in the States themselves there is a struggle between two internal projects:

1) globalist democrats (represented by Biden and Obama), who promote the concept of a “global digital concentration camp”, and they do not care about average Americans, in general about the United States, which is awaiting its own restructuring;

2) Republican patriots represented by the Trump team, they stand for the “America First” plan. They do not want to sacrifice the United States to the “world revolution” of the new Trotskyist globalists. On the contrary, they are ready to bury all plans for a global “reset” and save the United States. Destroy NATO, which has become the bureaucratic structure of the globalists.

Representatives of the globalists talk about this openly. Thus, former American President Donald Trump is serious about the US leaving the North Atlantic Alliance if he is re-elected. About this in an interview with the newspaper Die Welt said former National Security Advisor to the President of the United States John Bolton. He stressed that the possibility of NATO weakening “does not worry Trump.”

Bolton also said that during his presidency, Trump gave the Pentagon a binding order to work out plans for the withdrawal of American forces from Germany.

Earlier, US President Joe Biden said that European leaders are very frightened by Trump's words about leaving NATO, and pointed out that such a policy is contrary to American interests.

Trump wants to preserve “good old America” - with a white majority (hence the strict migration agenda), a middle class, and a concentration on solving national problems rather than global ones. Therefore, it is necessary to dismantle NATO as the key power structure of the future “new world order” in the version of the globalists. Reformat NATO to the American order. When the United States reduces its military presence in Europe and the world as much as possible, but maintains global military-technological dominance. Europe must pay for its security.

Accordingly, in the States themselves, an agenda for a new civil war has already developed: a split in the elite and society in the image of the future of America (The US has come close to its own internal catastrophe). The migration issue is a fuse-detonator. Globalist Democrats want to drown “old America” in millions of new citizens, Republicans are ready to give a decisive rebuff. Hence the demarche of Texas with the closure of the border by its own security forces and the Republican states that supported it.

New front


Naturally, the bureaucratic structures of the EU, NATO and US satellites are concerned about this situation. Hence the buildup of the military capabilities of NATO countries. Pumping up the military-industrial complex. Military preparations of the Baltic limitrophes. Talk about a direct conflict between NATO and the Russian Federation, etc.

Such “abscesses” are solved by a new crisis. This is the “reboot” of the planet: through a series of crises, conflicts and wars.

"2024 will be even crazier, that's my prediction"

- wrote American billionaire Elon Musk in a post on his social network X (formerly Twitter) in response to a user’s question about what to expect this year after “four years of madness.”

Therefore, the forecast is this: in 2024, along with the Ukrainian Front, the war in the Gaza Strip and the Houthis’ actions to undermine global communications (trade, submarine communication cables), several more fronts will arise. The appearance of regular NATO forces in Ukraine itself, provocations on the border with Belarus and Kaliningrad, in the Baltic states, Transnistria, Taiwan, and Korea are possible.

Moscow apparently understands this and is trying to increase the level of sustainability. Thus, the re-establishment of the Moscow and Leningrad military districts, the effort of the Southern District (at the expense of new regions) is an attempt to fend off threats in the Belarusian (central), northwestern - Baltic (including Finland), and Ukrainian directions.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

89 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +1
    1 March 2024 05: 26
    It's time to disperse the population of the western regions.
    The first step may be to move the capital beyond the Urals. Let us honestly explain to citizens that we are preparing to repel a nuclear strike. The media should do their best to highlight the vulnerability of megacities and advertise the regions. Of course, those who have invested in Moscow real estate will not like this and there will be opposition.
    The beginning of migration to the east will give a signal to the NATO party representatives that Russia is not joking and, if necessary, is ready to use “Mother Kuzma”.
    1. +3
      1 March 2024 05: 31
      Far Eastern and Arctic hectares to everyone, or rather to those who survive...
      1. +7
        1 March 2024 05: 47
        Quote: curvimeter
        Far Eastern and Arctic hectare to everyone

        Come, you are welcome!
        1. -3
          1 March 2024 06: 07
          Only under escort... Otherwise I would have sent a couple of zshelons to master, so to speak... I think from the current camarilla we would have gathered smile
    2. +8
      1 March 2024 06: 31
      Of course, those who have invested in Moscow real estate will not like this

      Most of all, our chief digitizer and lover of 30-story man-made buildings will not like this...
    3. -3
      1 March 2024 08: 11
      Quote: kosmozoo
      The beginning of migration to the east will give a signal to the NATO party representatives that Russia is not joking and, if necessary, is ready to use “Mother Kuzma”.


      The most optimal signal to the West will be... the use of tactical nuclear weapons to break through the front in Donbass, the liquidation of Zelensky along with all his “close associates” and the defeat of the Ukrainian Armed Forces in a short time. Only this can really scare the West and understand that the matter will not be limited to arrivals against the NATO contingent in Ukraine, then there will be arrivals of strategic nuclear weapons in European cities.

      And everything else is not scary for the West... because They understand that GDP is only formidable in words, but in fact, how many red lines have been violated? There the felt-tip pen has already dried. And then everything will continue to grow... since in the West they understand that the GDP will be afraid to use tactical nuclear weapons in Ukraine because of political risks and condemnation from the world community, and without it there will be a proxy war between the EU and Russia on the territory of Ukraine... at the beginning it was helmets, armored armor, then these weapons/ammunition, then long-range missiles... now we are waiting for Western aviation and then a trial contingent of a NATO country, which will be joined by other countries... in general, the meat grinder will continue, with subsequent new mobilization in Russia (on defense of the Fatherland, against Western countries).
      1. -18
        1 March 2024 08: 40
        Quote: Aleksandr21
        And everything else is not scary for the West... how many red lines have been violated... in the West they understand that the GDP will be afraid to use tactical nuclear weapons... in general, the meat grinder will continue
        You are basing your hysterical “forecasts” on something you don’t know for certain: what is scary there in the West, what they understand and what Putin will be afraid of. After the “red lines” the NWO began, and the West already sees that they are losing. I don’t know how long the SVO will last, I believe, until the tasks to achieve the set goals are resolved. The Russian Federation is focused and ready for confrontation with NATO, but they are still in discord and fuss over the need to restore the economy and their military potential against the backdrop of streets manured by farmers in European capitals.
        1. +17
          1 March 2024 08: 56
          Quote: Stanislav_Shishkin
          After the “red lines” the NWO began, and the West already sees that they are losing.


          And that's why they ask for peace? :) No, it’s not particularly clear that the West is losing, if it had, then negotiations would begin on the future of Ukraine - Russia, and the relationship between Russia and the West as a whole, but we see a different picture... When Russia’s military potential is weakening, and this despite the fact that the NATO contingent is not yet directly involved in hostilities (in the broad sense). And Macron’s statement is a continuation of the policy that they chose in 2022 to confront Russia.

          But I see statements from GDP, which in interviews and on various platforms sends signals about peace and readiness for dialogue when they don’t want to hear it. because they are confident that they will not lose. Even now, after 2 years since the beginning of the Northern Military District, what do we see at the front? Is there a fracture? No. Even in the Avdeevsky direction, we will now reach the line Ocheretino - Novoselovka - Kamyshevka and there we will most likely stop for six months, if not more, in other directions the progress is also quite modest... and next year, the West will prepare the Armed Forces of Ukraine for a new counter-offensive, will provide the promised 1 million drones, if not more (and they will give them, there is no doubt... the desire to defeat Russia is strong), factories that have entered into long-term contracts for the supply of artillery. shells will reach the required speed + equipment will be supplied from US reserves + aviation and a new wave of counter-offensive awaits us. And then more... So this won't end well.
          1. -11
            1 March 2024 09: 09
            Quote: Aleksandr21
            GDP, which in interviews and on various platforms sends signals about peace and readiness for dialogue
            Where he is asked about this, he answers: we are ready, but Zelensky forbade Ukraine. What should he answer? “I don’t want peace, but I want war until the last Ukrainian”? No need, this is their line, why repeat it. Ukraine’s demands to return to the 1991 borders have long been declared non-negotiable fantasies. We will see what the demands of the Russian Federation will be if negotiations begin without pushing this topic forward now so that “it will not end well.” Or is that why you come here?
            1. +9
              1 March 2024 09: 25
              Quote: Stanislav_Shishkin
              Where he is asked about this, he answers: we are ready, but Zelensky forbade Ukraine. What should he answer?


              He must state that until Russia achieves its goals in Ukraine, negotiations will not begin. And again, negotiations with whom? Does he want to negotiate with those he calls Nazis and drug addicts? Well then they will not answer for their crimes, for the terrorist attacks they committed and for much more + negotiations presuppose a compromise... this means that Russia will not achieve its goals and there will be a repetition of the Minsk Agreement 3.0, only this time.
              Yes, it’s not even a matter of statements, but the position that Russia takes: it’s either to finish off the “Nazis” to the end or to negotiate with them, which is called “you either take off the cross or put on your panties.”

              Quote: Stanislav_Shishkin
              Or is that why you come here?


              I come here for analytics and interesting comments, + sometimes I come across interesting interlocutors... answered your question?
              1. -9
                1 March 2024 09: 39
                Quote: Aleksandr21
                He must state that until Russia achieves its goals in Ukraine, negotiations will not begin.
                Did you yourself decide that the SVO will end before Russia fulfills all its goals in Ukraine? Or do you think that the faster and more Ukrainians who are dragged there like meat animals are destroyed, the better? But this is associated with an increase in the number of casualties on our actively advancing side. The Ukrainian Armed Forces are already being methodically destroyed, when they are driven into a counterattack, they run back, and ours gradually advance deeper into the country on their shoulders.
                1. +8
                  1 March 2024 10: 20
                  Quote: Stanislav_Shishkin
                  Did you yourself decide that the SVO will end before Russia fulfills all its goals in Ukraine?


                  Only the president can decide when the SVO will end; I can only tell you about my vision of the current situation. And I don’t really like what I see... Because delaying the deadlines for the SVO can backfire on us (it is already happening: shelling of Russian cities, UAVs that attack infrastructure, a crisis in the economy and an increase in risks for the security of the country as a whole, etc.).

                  If we talk specifically about the current situation at the front, we see that the enemy is defending himself very competently, and is trying to inflict as much damage as possible on the assault detachments of the Russian Armed Forces, in order to later gain a respite, gather strength and launch a new counter-offensive. And this is the right tactic... we don’t know at what cost the same villages in the Avdeevsky direction will be acquired (but obviously not small) and the tactic of attacking head-on eats up our offensive potential... I’m afraid that the situation like with Severodonetsk-Lisichansk will repeat itself. When, after heavy fighting, the Russian Armed Forces stopped to “regroup” and replenish reserves. But in the current situation, much will depend on the replenishment of contract soldiers, i.e. How many people are still willing? or is there already a need for a new wave of mobilization? In any case, even with the current frontal tactics, a turning point is not visible, the enemy has huge reserves and a number of personnel that have not yet been deployed, and ahead are Konstantinovka (66 km2), Kramatorsk (124 km2), Slavyansk (60 km2) and I have little idea what forces do we need to take them, especially if the situation like with Mariupol and Bakhmut repeats + what time it will take... after all, there are risks on the part of the West that it will get together, supply everything necessary and a turning point will occur on their part (the situation like in the Kharkov region will repeat and Kherson).

                  Therefore, there is an idea that we need to finish quickly... but how? a new mobilization is not a solution, it will only increase our losses, so the main emphasis should be on the use of increasingly powerful types of weapons, including tactical nuclear weapons, which many do not like, due to the risks... and speed up the breakthrough of the Ukrainian Armed Forces’ defense in Donbass, otherwise we will have to fight for each settlement will last another 5-10 years at best, and at worst the West will overtake us in the military-industrial complex and give such advantages to the Armed Forces of Ukraine that it can completely change the situation at the front.
                  1. +2
                    2 March 2024 15: 09
                    Quote: Aleksandr21
                    delaying the deadlines for the SVO could backfire on us

                    And you propose the massive use of tactical nuclear weapons... in the Donbass? On your territory? And I hope you understand that the piecemeal use of tactical nuclear weapons will not give any effect. They can't hit cities, right? And on the LBS this is a maximum company ... well, battalion stronghold. Is it worth it? Or is it better to throw 10-20-30 pieces of APAB there?
                    Strike deep into the territory?
                    So again, when we return our land to ourselves, will we just wander through the radioactive ashes and scratch our turnips? What to do about it?
                    Let's soberly look at WHAT we need for the quick and decisive defeat of the Ukrainian Armed Forces and the deoccupation of the Russian Black Sea region.
                    The size of the group should be about 1,5 million active bayonets. Do we have that much now?
                    No.
                    How much do you have ?
                    Together with the forces undergoing training and coordination - about 1 million (specifically for the Northern Military District zone).
                    When will the desired number arrive?
                    If you try very hard, with the involvement of the National Guard contingent (cleansing, control of liberated territories), volunteers and internationalists, then... by the end of summer. But even with the available forces, by the beginning of summer we can begin quite serious offensive operations. And reserves and replenishments will arrive in working order. It's already debugged.
                    What else do we need?
                    Armaments. First of all, artillery - cannon and rocket, at the same time long-range and high-precision. The industry is working on this, but it will take some time for the necessary potential to appear. I think everything will be ready by the summer company.
                    Ammunition?
                    The issue has practically been resolved and their production is being increased. But all this became possible during the time that our Army won in defensive battles last year. Where are you rushing her?
                    To victory ? ... Exactly? ... There is a good Russian proverb - hurry up slowly. Those. no fuss.
                    By summer, our fire and strike power will increase 1,5 times from the current one. Then we'll talk.
                    Quote: Aleksandr21
                    ahead Konstantinovka (66 km2), Kramatorsk (124 km2), Slavyansk (60 km2)

                    After the front has been pushed away from the Donetsk agglomeration to a distance excluding the impact of cannon artillery, I don’t think that this particular direction will be the main one. Unless the enemy’s front crumbles and you have to go on his shoulders to the neighboring area. In the meantime, the bloodshed of head-on assault operations is determined precisely by the need to push the front away from Donetsk and its agglomeration. Because the enemy is committing atrocities, but the air defense does not intercept artillery shells.
                    1. 0
                      2 March 2024 17: 13
                      Quote: bayard
                      Let's soberly look at WHAT we need for the quick and decisive defeat of the Ukrainian Armed Forces and the deoccupation of the Russian Black Sea region.


                      Let's take a sober look, I'm all for it. 2 years have passed since the beginning of the Northern Military District, the defense of the Armed Forces of Ukraine in Donbass is holding and the front line is practically unchanged in the broad sense, and there are some successes in the Avdeevka direction, but how many times did they take the same Avdeevka? There, since February 2022, there were battles for it and we hit with everything we could, and only recently we managed to make a half-grip and cut off the supply routes of the Armed Forces of Ukraine from the north, and then it became pointless to hold the Armed Forces of Ukraine... there is progress in this direction, but at what cost? Or do you think that due to the advantages of our aircraft in FABs and art. We have small losses of shells? Let's take a broader look... The Russian Armed Forces are now trying to advance in many directions, but their offensive potential is being wasted, it was not in vain that I remembered the situation with Severodonetsk-Lisichansk, when after the capture ours decided to stop to restore the group, and in this case I think the picture will be similar, The only question is where they will stop because... With the forces we have, we won’t be able to storm every populated area head-on…. There are directions where there is practically no progress at all (Sinkovka - which opens the way to Kupyansk) or Belogorovka which will allow us to encircle Seversk and then 2 directions will open at once where we can go, but so far there is no change there and the Armed Forces of Ukraine stubbornly hold the defense... on the border with Belarus it costs 120 thousand grouping that is not involved in the Donbass, in the Odessa direction, near Kiev there are also reserves and not small ones, i.e. The problem with the personnel of the Armed Forces of Ukraine is not that big if you look into it (another 500 thousand will be needed -1 million people will be recruited)…. And to defeat the enemy, much greater forces and means are needed than are currently available.

                      There is no need to talk about the recruitment of the Russian Guard because... those who could have already been involved, and the rest are needed locally. With Volunteers too... in 2 years, I think almost everyone was chosen. It is unknown with contract soldiers, but within such a period of time, whoever wanted to have already signed a contract, i.e. if the question arises of recruiting 500 thousand and above, then you will have to make a new mobilization, how will this affect the economy/sentiment within Russia, etc. this is a completely different story...

                      There is also the problem of the buildup on the part of the Western military-industrial complex, there is no need to watch how they cry in the media and assume that everything is bad for them... The Ukrainian Armed Forces will give everything they need for a new counter-offensive and they will find shells (ours at the front generally do not feel a shortage of the Ukrainian Armed Forces) and drones/UAVs will deliver (promised 1 million and above)… what will happen if Western industry can at least catch up with our military-industrial complex? Or overtake? The bet will definitely be placed on drones and the destruction of enemy personnel remotely through UAV operators... If they produce 5-10 times more UAVs, then there won’t be enough assault troops. Kharchenko writes that the Ukrainians have already reached 100 drones per month, and now imagine if the West gets involved in full.

                      Therefore, IMHO, I don’t see a quick victory given the current realities, and this whole story can stretch out until 2030 quite calmly if the Ukrainians hold the line + they are supplied with everything they need, and there is a possibility that they will gain offensive potential and repeat the counterattack ( there may be more than one) taking into account the supply of aviation / rates for drones + UAVs / supply of shells (Western factories are operating, long-term contracts have been concluded) and the situation at the front may seriously change. And based on this, I propose to speed up the breakthrough of the Ukrainian Armed Forces’ defense with the help of increasingly powerful types of weapons, including tactical nuclear weapons, so that we don’t have to take every (small) settlement for a month or more, I’m not even talking about large ones... Then the war will end faster and it will end with our victory, and if we delay, then everything may change in a completely bad direction.
                    2. 0
                      2 March 2024 17: 27
                      There is another version of the event (more realistic), in which now the Russian Armed Forces will show success at the front before the elections, and then we will run into tight defenses and will not be able to advance in a short time... And we will only wait for the result of the presidential elections in the United States, the result of which will make it clear whether an agreement will be possible; if so, then everything will stop along the current line of contact and everything will be resolved in the diplomatic field.
                      1. -1
                        2 March 2024 19: 51
                        You just don’t understand... rather, you don’t know the true reasons for the SVO that happened so suddenly and why we started it with such a small group. I advise you to google the video of the conversation between M. Khazin and Goblin on YouTube (it came out about a day or two ago), where Mikhail at the very beginning talks about the main reason for the start of the North Military District and why there was a landing on Gostomel. He has already repeated this reason several times in various speeches, and he is a very informed person - an “old apparatchik.” I think then you will understand why everything was exactly like this, who was the instigator and instigator of all this, and why we are still (yes, still) on the strategic defense. And our offensives in several directions at once are not even operational, but operational-tactical in nature. Bye .
                        By the beginning of summer, the strike and firepower of our SVO group will increase by 1,5 times and, as I hope, much more serious combat operations will begin, and on a wider front.
                        But as of 24.02.2022/280/50. the number of all ground forces of the Russian Armed Forces was only 20 thousand. Another 100 thousand were in the Airborne Forces and about 60 thousand in the Marine Marines of the Navy. All over the Country!! Therefore, having assembled a group of 550 thousand from all this, including the Special Forces and the Russian Guard, and hastily mobilized two corps of the LDPR (600 thousand), we began with this. While the Ukrainian Armed Forces had, in total, even without the mobilization that began on the first day, there were approximately 250 - 100 fuel assemblies. armed people - 3 thousand Armed Forces of Ukraine, 70 thousand military defense brigades + National Guard + Border Troops (which the Russian Federation does NOT have to this day) + armed formations of Nazi groups... And the mobilization that began gave XNUMX thousand volunteers in Kiev alone in the first XNUMX weeks.
                        But the Gostomel landing completed its task - 4 British nuclear warheads (2 each for Ukraine and Turkey) were captured and the British plan for the development of events was a fiasco. . But to force a used person to agree to the proposed agreements (a special operation is a special operation because it pursued goals limited in time and scale)
                        But since the war became inexorably protracted, we began to prepare for just such a Great and Protracted War. Since the beginning of autumn 2022, both the economy, the military-industrial complex, and Finance have coped with this task and continue to cope. But in order to arm and equip new formations of the RF Armed Forces, it is necessary to produce all this, purchase it, put it in warehouses and issue it to units... That is, this is a living process, like a conveyor belt. Which allows you to arm, equip and train 40 thousand soldiers (full-strength combined arms corps) per month at training grounds and training centers. That’s why they conclude exactly that many contracts per month - a pass-through system for preparation and recruitment. The rest are waiting their turn.
                      2. Egg
                        0
                        6 March 2024 10: 47
                        Quote: bayard
                        I advise you to google the video of the conversation between M. Khazin and Goblin on YouTube (it came out about a day or two ago)

                        Can you post a direct link? There is no time to review everything that has popped up.
                      3. -1
                        6 March 2024 16: 41
                        Quote: Telur
                        Can you post a direct link?

                        Goblin and Khazin don’t release videos very often, you can look for them on Goblin’s channel, but I don’t store links.
                      4. +2
                        2 March 2024 20: 14
                        Therefore, there is no need to create panic with the proposal of nuclear strikes on the Donbass and the Russian Lands of the Northern Black Sea Coast. Just with a cool head, calculate all the possible consequences. Why do we all need such consequences that will only complicate everything for us and the World? Do auto-training - imagine yourself as a mighty bull on top of a hill, under which a herd of cows grazes. . . Not a young and impatient bull, but a mighty, hefty bull. And give advice to your young and impatient companion yourself. hi
                        And don’t worry about the number of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, all their fronts are already cracking. They are already beginning to withdraw and transfer those same reserves from the internal regions, from near Kyiv, Odessa, from near Kharkov and the Belarusian border.
                        But they keep these forces there for a reason. They await a new blow to Kyiv, Chernigov, Kharkov and Sumy with trepidation. That's why they keep troops there. And they are afraid of the landing operation in the Odessa region. They are very afraid. .. But we have to move and move... But we haven’t even started to attack yet - we’re just squeezing the Armed Forces of Ukraine away from the Donetsk agglomeration.
                        I can tell you what it’s like to live under shelling for almost 10 years now - I live in Donetsk. And “Grad” also flew into the roof of my house. And the whole yard was covered with “Petals” - at night.
                        You just think like this - to form a combat-ready and well-armed group of 1,5 million people from scratch. ? Provide it with command staff? Equipment and weapons? Just equip such an army?
                        There is no need to fuss, everyone needs to do their job in their place. . And the herd under our hill will not go anywhere - we will cover EVERYONE. bully
                  2. +1
                    4 March 2024 11: 03
                    Once upon a time, while working together, fate brought me together with an operational police officer. The operative was, as they say, “from God,” and not from the category of office sitters. Watching him work, I asked the question, how does he manage to quickly create a “picture” of what is happening? To which I received the answer: if you can answer simple questions - what, where, when, why (who benefits) you will receive complete information about what is happening. The main thing is not to make mistakes in your assessments. Try to evaluate the SVO in the same way; personally, I get a far from rosy picture.
                2. +1
                  5 March 2024 20: 20
                  Stanislav Shishkin, even for me, who is far from personnel officers, it is clear that if the army cannot capture 4-5 regions, then something is wrong here... And after the appeal of the GDP on February 24.02. to our soldiers to “be humane with the Armed Forces of Ukraine and almost “take care” of them.... I just went nuts and wondered “who and what our general commanders are reporting to him” ... with all due respect to the GDP.
                  1. -1
                    6 March 2024 10: 12
                    Quote: Andrey Nikolaevich
                    if the army cannot capture 4-5 regions, then something is wrong here
                    Such conclusions are not made out of the blue. Do you have any historical examples suitable for comparison with the SVO to give an example of “that” (how it should be)?
            2. +7
              1 March 2024 09: 27
              By the way, such provocative phrases

              Quote: Stanislav_Shishkin
              their hysterical "predictions"


              Quote: Stanislav_Shishkin
              Or is that why you come here?


              Do you even write for money, or does your upbringing allow you to do this?
              1. -6
                1 March 2024 09: 53
                Quote: Aleksandr21
                then they will not answer for their crimes
                This is what I call “cliquishness”.
                Quote: Aleksandr21
                negotiations involve compromise... this means that Russia will not achieve its goals
                The USSR negotiated not only with the Nazis, but also with our allies. And so a compromise had to be made, and then many Nazis managed to avoid execution. Today we have no allies, but there is an enemy who will either be defeated or forced to agree to our terms. The goals of the NWO have been announced, and they have not changed downward.
              2. -6
                1 March 2024 10: 22
                Quote: Aleksandr21
                Quote: Stanislav_Shishkin
                Or is that why you come here?
                Do you even write for money, or does your upbringing allow you to do this?
                What kind of upbringing forbids calling a spade a spade?
                Quote: Aleksandr21
                And then more... So this won't end well.
                I call such comments hysterical “forecasts” because that’s what they are. This is exactly the kind of discourse that the 5th Column promotes at all times. Guard patriots are not suppressed in the information space just because we have a military system, and not a war and martial law in the country. Otherwise, they wouldn’t stand on ceremony with you and no one would admonish you.
                1. +5
                  1 March 2024 10: 32
                  Quote: Stanislav_Shishkin
                  I call such comments hysterical “forecasts” because that’s what they are. This is exactly the kind of discourse that the 5th Column promotes at all times.


                  Patriotism does not mean that you need to hit yourself in the forehead with your heel by telling how cool and well done we are, paid “experts” do a great job with TV, but it is about seeing the real picture and the risks for the country... talking about it and not keeping silent, don’t talk about problems, this will be much more useful, then if the problem is visible it can be fixed... and everything is fine in our kingdom (c).

                  Think about this, on the topic of the 5th column and forecasts that you don’t like.
                  1. -1
                    1 March 2024 11: 26
                    Quote: Aleksandr21
                    If the problem is visible it can be fixed
                    A problem is not a roadside weed; it must first be understood, i.e., see unresolved contradictions, arrange them into cause-and-effect relationships, from which a tree of problems can be formed, which makes it possible to make forecasts in order to look for ways to resolve the problem situation. Those who want to change the situation do so. Every contradiction requires the presence of an antithesis. Without it, no mental actions are carried out, all sorts of crap is only instilled in the public. I and other participants promote it in our comments to the best of our ability. Revealing the lies that someone is deliberately pushing here, someone is repeating for the company, passing it off as “forecasts”, this, of course, will not waste the opponent, but will only complicate the further spread of decadent sentiments by the enemy’s 5th column and random guards. patriots. This is how I see the situation on the forum.
          2. +2
            1 March 2024 09: 49
            I don’t agree that the front will stand up if we reach the line: Ocheretino-Novoselovka-Kamyshevka, then Ugledar, Orekhov, Gulyai Pole will definitely fall and the Zaporozhye section of the front will move up greatly and this will have a strong impact on the morale of the whole.
            1. -2
              1 March 2024 09: 55
              if we get there

              keyword if (and at what cost?)
              This will have a strong impact on everyone's morale.

              Well, we’ve been hearing these mantras since the capture of Mariupol (and they talked about the same thing about Avdeevka)
          3. -6
            1 March 2024 10: 06
            Quote: Aleksandr21
            When Russia's military potential is weakening
            Did you come up with it yourself, or did you read it somewhere? I don’t know what potential you have is being weakened, but the military-industrial complex is working at full speed, the army is receiving and mastering new weapons, tactics, etc., in 2024 the number of military personnel in the ranks of our army will be increased to 1,5 million people. That's why the cries of "everything is lost!" You can’t call them anything other than hysterical.
            1. +9
              1 March 2024 10: 26
              Quote: Stanislav_Shishkin
              Did you come up with it yourself, or did you read it somewhere? I don’t know what potential you have is being weakened, but the military-industrial complex is working at full capacity, the army is receiving and mastering new weapons, tactics, etc.


              But you forget that the loss of military equipment/aviation/navy is also a decrease in military potential, how much aviation have we lost? Have we already restored it? or armored vehicles? The questions are rhetorical. Not to mention the losses in the Russian Armed Forces. It’s only on TV that everything is fine and beautiful.
              1. -4
                1 March 2024 10: 41
                Quote: Aleksandr21
                Questions are rhetorical.
                These are questions to which you don’t know the answers, but you pretend that you do and scream in vain. We produce more weapons than we lose in the Northern Military District, and the West produces less. Why do you think that everything is lost for the Russian Federation? That's why I think that's why you come here. I have not yet seen any analytics, anything other than the anti-Russian rhetoric of a guard-patriot insisting on his “right” to shout “guard” with or without reason from you. In the DPRK they would have already let you go, but I just admonish you: “Don’t try to talk.”
                1. +7
                  1 March 2024 10: 54
                  Quote: Stanislav_Shishkin
                  Why do you think that everything is lost for the Russian Federation?


                  I never said that everything was lost. Apparently you read so “well”... regarding the reduction of military potential, I wrote in the context of the confrontation with the West and this is true in fact. If a country loses the Nth amount of military equipment/aviation/navy as a result of a BD, then it does not become stronger because of this, its potential decreases. Yes, even for the same ammunition, how many warehouses had to be emptied before the expansion of ammunition production began, how many missiles were spent, etc. and it will take time to restore all this, so there is no “guard” here.
                  1. -4
                    1 March 2024 11: 43
                    Quote: Aleksandr21
                    If a country loses the Nth amount of military equipment/aviation/navy as a result of a war, then it does not become stronger because of this, its potential decreases.
                    They forgot to add: if the military-industrial complex does not produce more than the country loses. Do you have information from a reliable source that this is true? There is a turmoil in the West: Ukraine is spending more weapons than they have time to produce, because they have already raked out the old Soviet weapons in Europe. They see their problem, they will somehow try to solve it, and where do you get your data from, that “the potential is decreasing.” For some it decreases, while for others it increases. In this situation, impotence threatens the West.
                  2. -1
                    1 March 2024 12: 29
                    Quote: Aleksandr21
                    this is true in fact
                    They borrowed from O. Bender: “There is no God, this is a medical fact”?
                    Quote: Aleksandr21
                    how many warehouses had to be emptied before the expansion of ammunition production began
                    Exactly enough to begin expanding production, including innovation, at a faster pace than consumption. Do you imagine the situation differently?
          4. 0
            6 March 2024 12: 40
            Will the EU also give a million soldiers to the Outskirts next year? They may have time to give birth, but it’s unlikely to raise and train them.
        2. +1
          1 March 2024 09: 56
          the need to restore the economy
          Do you still believe that the economy there (here) is in such a mess that it needs restoration?
    4. 0
      1 March 2024 18: 12
      Of course, you will be rejected, but at least you need to prepare for the transfer of some of the capital’s functions to Yekaterinburg (Novosibirsk). The vast territory of our country and the ability to disperse is our huge advantage. I support your position, kosmozoo. Only the Kremlin’s may not be up to the task. And I am personally sure that as soon as the striped ones establish serial hypersound, they will place Norway-Finland-Baltic-Poland-404 in an arc on the sea, on land and in the air and there will be a tough ultimatum. If some of the capital's functions leave Moscow, it will be easier to answer.
    5. 0
      1 March 2024 18: 24
      Are you kidding? Already under the USSR they refused to remove civilians from megacities
    6. +1
      5 March 2024 22: 05
      They're bluffing. Put everything on the line? Doubtful. The Western elite lives too well. But you can lose everything. It's one thing to incite someone. Another thing is to get in over your head. Even a few nuclear explosions in Western Europe will lead to panic and currency depreciation. What if the transatlantic and pacific cables are blown up? Channel Tunnel? Dutch dams? All nuclear units in Europe? Satellites destroyed? Financial centers? And so on. Let them move in with such a grandmother themselves. Russia is too tough for them. Although they need to be punched in the teeth.
  2. -1
    1 March 2024 05: 40
    Who is outdoing whom? This is approximately the rhetoric of European leaders. Frightened by what has been said, they say that they were misunderstood. One should not expect anything intelligible from Europe. Of course, anything can be done, but what will be the consequences.. And it is no coincidence that Macron is trying on clothes Napoleon. Although it is too big for him. It’s so nice to play the role of the main patron in the future. And the patron himself thinks about what to spend the money on. Either in the Middle East, or in Ukraine, or on an election campaign.
  3. +8
    1 March 2024 05: 52
    So the Bulgarian leadership started talking about the possible sending of its troops to occupy Ukraine.
    So Macron didn’t just blurt out about NATO troops in Ukraine.
    I consider this process a logical overall result of NATO’s approach and consolidation to the borders of Russia.
    Next will be the preparation of a NATO bridgehead on the territory of Ukraine for a strike on Russia with the ensuing consequences of its collapse and destruction following the example of Iraq, Yugoslavia, and Libya.
    GDP will share the fate of Milosevic or Gaddafi if he continues to show good will and the desire to negotiate with the West at any cost.
    The examples of Hussein, Gaddafi and Milosevic are before our eyes...they also tried to appease the war hawks in Washington and paid for it with their lives.
    1. +6
      1 March 2024 07: 20
      The Bulgarians, even in alliance with Hitler, did not dare to fight against the USSR. This means that fear is lost, and the unimaginable can really happen. About the “agenda of the civil war in the USA” made me laugh. There is a rigid police state and a society completely different from ours
    2. +4
      1 March 2024 08: 55
      GDP will share the fate of Milosevic or Gaddafi
      “To the village, huh? Come on! Who’s going to put him in prison?! He’s a monument!” (c) ...
    3. -4
      1 March 2024 08: 58
      Quote: Lech from Android.
      Examples of Hussein, Gaddafi and Milosevic... they also tried to appease the war hawks in Washington
      Appease? What could they do against the USA? Libya under Gaddafi became the richest country where a nurse had a salary of 1500 USD; under Hussein, Iraq was a developing state where people did not fear for their lives, Milosevic defended the Serbs, just as the Russian Federation today defends Russians in Ukraine. They all tried to develop their countries without regard to the United States, for which they were killed. The West, obviously, decided that the same could be done with the Russian Federation, but, in my opinion, they already understand that they miscalculated.
      1. -2
        1 March 2024 09: 00
        The Taliban in slippers were able to kick the Americans and their mongrels out of Afghanistan...so this is a rhetorical question.
        1. -5
          1 March 2024 09: 14
          Quote: Lech from Android.
          The Taliban in slippers were able to kick the Americans and their mongrels out of Afghanistan
          In all of history, no one has ever managed to conquer Afghanistan, even though they fight today in sneakers.
          1. 0
            6 March 2024 12: 46
            Maybe because the income from such a war with the Middle Ages is not enough. Are the costs of completely destroying the state too high?
            1. 0
              6 March 2024 13: 24
              Quote from Traktoris
              Maybe because the income from such a war with the Middle Ages is not enough. Are the costs of completely destroying the state too high?
              And, for example, the United States went there, spending hundreds of billions of dollars, not counting reputational losses. Why? They don’t know how to calculate the benefits and thought that this was a good gamble?
              1. 0
                6 March 2024 17: 16
                Thirst is nothing, image is everything!
      2. -1
        1 March 2024 09: 58
        Libya under Gaddafi became the richest country where a nurse had a salary of 1500 USD
        I talked with the Libyans; there was no such painted heavenly prosperity there. Otherwise, no one would have taken to the streets.
    4. +1
      1 March 2024 15: 47
      Hussein, Milosevic and Gaddafi did not have nuclear weapons. We have it. Moreover, in quantities sufficient to cause unacceptable damage to the “collective West”. I’m not an expert, of course, but personally I don’t understand how you can do what you described (disintegration and destruction) with a country that has such nuclear potential. Are there any realistic scenarios like this? Where can I read it? Just don’t advise me to lose weight, please.
  4. +10
    1 March 2024 05: 58
    In general, a slow increase in degrees works great so far.
    Have you somehow forgotten the shock and cries here about sending small arms at the beginning of 2022?
    And the cries about Javelin supplies?
    Discussion that tanks - well, will they never be installed?
    Now they have “almost” agreed that F-16s will appear in Ukraine...
    So we can agree with the NATO troops. Slowly.

    True, it happens that the last straw breaks the camel’s back... And Russia will actually do something - to the surprise of its “partners”...
    But it would be better not to even bring it to the Javelins...
    1. +6
      1 March 2024 11: 50
      Quote from tsvetahaki
      Have you somehow forgotten the shock and cries here about sending small arms at the beginning of 2022? And the cries about Javelin supplies?

      That's right, yes.
      Just in case, let me remind those who have forgotten the history of the “terrible red lines” from Russian officials of the last two years:

      1. Supplies of Soviet heavy military equipment to Ukrainians are red lines. The lines were washed away with a warm stream and passed on.
      2. Supplies of stolen Soviet planes and helicopters are red lines. The lines were washed away with a warm stream and passed on
      3. Supplies of Ukrainian air defense systems to Ukraine are red lines. The lines were washed away with a warm stream and passed on
      4. Supplies of Western artillery systems to Ukrainians are red lines. The lines were washed away with a warm stream and passed on
      5. Supplies to Ukrainian MLRS "Himars" are red lines. The lines were washed away with a warm stream and passed on
      6. Supplies of Western air defense systems to Ukrainians are red lines. The lines were washed away with a warm stream and passed on
      7. Supplies of heavy military equipment to Western Ukrainians are red lines. The lines were washed away with a warm stream and passed on
      8. Supplies of stolen Stormshadow and Scalp missiles (up to 300 km) are red lines. The lines were washed away with a warm stream and passed on
      9. Supplies of stolen missiles to Khimars up to 160 km are red lines. The lines were washed away with a warm stream and passed on
      10. The blows of dill on the Kerch Bridge are red lines. The lines were washed away with a warm trickle, the bridge was attacked several times, and was successfully disabled twice.
      11. Strikes by dill on the “indigenous” territory of the Russian Federation with Western weapons are red lines. The lines were washed away with a warm stream, blows were made daily.

      Well, where are we currently:
      12. Deliveries to the Ukrainians of Taurus-type missiles with a range of 500-550 km are red lines.
      13. Supplies to stolen F-16s are red lines.
      As usual, we are waiting for the flow and deliveries of these weapons in the near future.

      There are also “more other” red lines on the lists, such as uranium and cluster munitions, but this is just a small thing compared to everything else.
      Demilitarization is proceeding at an accelerated pace, yes.
      1. 0
        2 March 2024 10: 11
        ...washed off with a warm stream and handed over

        Is this warm stream the one that tests?
  5. +3
    1 March 2024 06: 14
    American President Donald Trump is serious about the US leaving the North Atlantic Alliance if he is re-elected.
    And if Trump doesn’t live up to expectations, he won’t be re-elected? War?
    1. +6
      1 March 2024 08: 18
      Is anyone else hoping for Trump? It’s like with Carlson (they say, our man). But he is actually an American. And he drowns for his Country... Yes
    2. 0
      3 March 2024 04: 06
      Quote: parusnik
      American President Donald Trump is serious about the US leaving the North Atlantic Alliance if he is re-elected.
      And if Trump doesn’t live up to expectations, he won’t be re-elected? War?

      Well, all hope is for the help of the Americans laughing laughing laughing
      There seems to be no hope for us ourselves.
  6. +5
    1 March 2024 06: 25
    Quote: Lech from Android.
    GDP will share the fate of Milosevic or Gaddafi if he continues to show good will and the desire to negotiate with the West at any cost.

    But this is in vain. He, like Hunchback, will receive a Nobel Prize and rest on his laurels. Their man, their protege and works in their interests... Everything else is promises and scarecrows, for internal use.
    1. 0
      1 March 2024 07: 19
      It’s unlikely that the Europeople prepared Gorbachev’s fate for him. At best, they’ll send you to The Hague for fun, if only so that others won’t. And they can do it like they did with Gaddafi.
      1. +3
        1 March 2024 08: 30
        You still cannot understand that this is one team, or rather a gang.
        1. +2
          1 March 2024 08: 49
          I talked a little about something else. Gorbachev was given a comfortable life in the West only to show that sell your homeland and live. If the West succeeds in destroying Russia from the inside, then the West will no longer need them, and for the West it will no longer matter whether it is one team or a gang or not - they will be put under the knife, and the “luckiest” will be sent to The Hague for fun.
          1. +3
            1 March 2024 10: 21
            For this shabby there is neither West nor East, they are all in the same boat. And the media will paint any reality, make black white and vice versa... You just have to take a closer look. The recent example of global Covid madness clearly showed “where the dog has been rummaging” and where we are flying faster and faster and the Russian Federation is in the forefront... And GDP is ahead on a dashing horse... That’s why I write that the Cossack is misplaced. Although it doesn’t matter whether it’s GDP or not, the train has left. We simply won’t have time to understand, and many won’t understand at all, where we ended up. Not a conspiracy theory. You can just analyze the events here and there over the last 4-5 years and it will become a little clearer what’s what.
  7. -1
    1 March 2024 06: 28
    More madness. Premonition of a big war

    And more articles by Comrade Samsonov!
    P.S. And if there is a big war, it will most likely be “one-sided”, as in Palestine...
  8. +2
    1 March 2024 07: 44
    Each EU country can send troops to Ukraine independently, since all its states have their own armed forces
    Something suggests that it was not in vain that Macron focused attention on this, suggesting that suddenly there would be an “independent idiot” who would fall for this statement. Where is France, and where is Ukraine, but there are countries bordering it: Poland, Slovakia, Hungary, Romania.
    Macron also promised to "do everything to ensure that Russia could not win this war"
    For now, he is actively supplying weapons and bombs (and in response, if possible, we are knocking out the French in “Independence”), and tomorrow, perhaps, to intimidate Russia, he will dance on the table.
  9. +4
    1 March 2024 07: 47
    Is the USA rotting and falling apart again? It’s been two hundred years since everything has happened, although this is Samsonov, he either vigorously threatens with a loaf, or with an ordinary “bonboy” on an intercontinental missile. It's spring, let's be lenient.
    1. +6
      1 March 2024 08: 23
      “Therefore, it is necessary to dismantle NATO as the key power structure of the future “new world order” in the version of the globalists. Reformat NATO to the American order.”

      aha.. the author writes that the United States is moving into a new world order and for this there is all the fuss.. what kind of order is this? where will they be hechemon? and NATO today is not under the “American order”? but I don’t even want to comment on the civil war in the USA... the vast majority of amers are quite apolitical... yes, they will come to the elections, but not to the civil war...
  10. +2
    1 March 2024 08: 08
    And there is still a good perspective in all this. Go to heaven, and bypass all competitions and terrible courts. It is known for certain from sources close to the original source itself!! And the enemies will simply die and crumble into nuclear dust. am So we must rejoice, raise support from 80% to 101% And then we will be able to achieve the age-old dream of every highly spiritual Orthodox Christian - to go to heaven!!!! lol
    1. +1
      1 March 2024 09: 03
      Go to heaven, bypassing all competitions and terrible judgments.
      I, I..paradise, dastish fantastic! There are milk rivers made from palm oil and jelly banks from who knows what, low mortgages, cheap loans, apples of knowledge, imported, probably.. “Everything is there for happiness, I’m just not there, so that means I’ll be there” (c) . smile
  11. +5
    1 March 2024 08: 31
    Article at the level of a TV expert.
  12. +4
    1 March 2024 08: 58
    The appearance of regular NATO forces in Ukraine itself, provocations on the border with Belarus and Kaliningrad, in the Baltic states, Transnistria, Taiwan, and Korea are possible.
    What's the forecast for when? Until the end of 2024? Or for the next three months?
  13. +1
    1 March 2024 09: 44
    1) globalist democrats (represented by Biden and Obama), who promote the concept of a “global digital concentration camp”, and they do not care about average Americans, in general about the United States, which is awaiting its own restructuring;

    2) Republican patriots represented by the Trump team, they stand for the “America First” plan. They do not want to sacrifice the United States to the “world revolution” of the new Trotskyist globalists. On the contrary, they are ready to bury all plans for a global “reset” and save the United States. Destroy NATO, which has become the bureaucratic structure of the globalists.

    It happened before. Comintern, “We will fan the world fire to the grief of all bourgeois!!!” And then Stalin came and that’s it, the Comintern ended. Yes, there was something else there, like a desire to negotiate with the West, but still.
    1. -1
      1 March 2024 09: 59
      It is THIS habit of spewing fantastically childish nonsense that is why Europe doesn’t like us.
      Stalin did not “come” from anywhere. Lenin took Stalin into his government.
      And Stalin became a great personality when he became the leader of the Bolsheviks.

      And Stalin had to forget the Comintern not when it “came”, but when Roosevelt and Churchill delivered an ultimatum: “either Lend-Lease assistance or the Comintern...”. It was in 1943...
  14. +5
    1 March 2024 09: 51
    The main goal of the West is the destruction of the Russian Federation and its dismemberment while preventing it from using nuclear weapons. It must be said that with their “peace-loving” rhetoric, which often resembles defeatist, the Russian authorities constantly give the West a reason to become convinced over and over again of the significant likelihood of such an outcome.

    Nothing strengthens a predator's intention to attack its prey more than the evidence of its helplessness.

    And in this sense, Russia has made significant progress in recent years.

    What is the point in the endless modernization of Russian strategic nuclear forces if the enemy is firmly convinced that he will be able to avoid their use. The basis for such confidence is the indecisiveness of the authorities, which constantly respond to hostile actions, almost always with statements alone.

    For the Anglo-Saxons, this is a sign of weakness and an invitation to further aggression. It is obvious.
    1. +3
      1 March 2024 12: 03
      Quote: avia12005
      destruction of the Russian Federation and its dismemberment while preventing it from using nuclear weapons

      1. To be honest, I can’t even imagine in theory how this is possible: to destroy and dismember and also to ensure that the nuclear weapons do not go anywhere. Do you have any versions? after all, it’s like “eat a fish and sit somewhere”
      2. What will the “West” get when achieving this goal that it doesn’t have now? here are the headaches with a bunch of semi-wild countries possessing nuclear weapons... and what goodies? Do you have an answer? with a specific advantage measured in money - after all, capitalists won’t do anything for an idea..
      3. My personal opinion is that a change of power is something else they are somehow considering.. division/destruction is not necessary for them.. and whoever thinks it is necessary, please answer questions 1,2 in my comment..
  15. +2
    1 March 2024 10: 47
    According to statistics, Macron’s nonsense was supported by only 26% of toad eaters...
  16. +7
    1 March 2024 11: 16
    Firstly, the conflict worsens the overall military and economic situation of Ukraine, the Russian Federation and the EU, the United States benefits.

    Economically, the Russian Federation is not benefiting at all.
  17. +3
    1 March 2024 12: 55
    “Therefore, the forecast is this: in 2024, along with the Ukrainian Front, the war in the Gaza Strip and the Houthis’ actions to undermine global communications (trade, submarine communication cables), several more fronts will arise. The appearance of regular NATO forces in Ukraine itself, provocations on the border with Belarus are possible and Kaliningrad, in the Baltic states, Transnistria, Taiwan, Korea."

    It’s a pity I quit smoking, otherwise it would have been interesting what kind of weed the author smoked.

    That is, any mess in the world is one of the fronts in Russia’s fight against absolute evil. Did the Houthis blow up ships - did Russia’s allies do this? Or enemies? And in the war in Gaza, who is Russia for?

    Recently there was a coup attempt in Chad - where are we?

    There are also supernovae...
    1. 0
      1 March 2024 15: 52
      That is, any mess in the world is one of the fronts in Russia’s fight against absolute evil.

      There was an anecdote in the USSR: “American imperialists are interfering in the internal affairs of the Soviet Union throughout the world.”
  18. -2
    1 March 2024 14: 27
    In order to buy a million-strong army from more than a hundred government entities of the world who condemned the North Military District of the Russian Federation in Ukraine and signed the decision of the Hague court, a few percent of the billions allocated to Ukraine would be enough, trained at NATO bases and sent to help the Armed Forces under the guise of volunteers.
    The catch is in armaments - ranking 5th in the world in terms of purchasing power, the Russian Federation produces more weapons than NATO (USA+Canada+Britain+EU)
  19. BAI
    -2
    1 March 2024 18: 07
    2022 excluded the possibility of supplying Kyiv with artillery, tanks, long-range missiles, helicopters and airplanes. And now it’s reality.”

    Thanks to the cowardice of the Russian government. One blah blah blah about red lines. Nuclear war is now inevitable
  20. -1
    1 March 2024 23: 07
    When they started on the 24th, was it difficult to calculate all this? Or is everything going according to plan?
  21. 0
    2 March 2024 20: 54
    Why, I don’t see our side preparing the population for a big war. It's about time. Where is the construction of bomb shelters, where are civil defense lessons, where is the organization of reserves in case of nuclear war. Remember how it was in the USSR, everywhere there were posters about what to do in the event of a nuclear war, exercises were held. One good thing is that the migrants will all run away from us.
  22. 0
    3 March 2024 01: 26
    Europe does not have the resource potential to wage a major war. There is no unifying idea, armed with which the masses of people will go to war in a single impulse. There is only a feeling of an inevitable deterioration in the standard of living, the advent of poverty, as it was in the 60-70s of the last century. And now the balance of power in the European Theater of Operations is completely different - there is no technological superiority of the potential army of a united Europe over the enemy army in the person of Russia. Rather, on the contrary, our strategic potential in the form of nuclear weapons is in better condition and is larger in terms of the number of carriers and charges. Hoping that the war will be waged by conventional means, as is happening now on the territory of Ukraine, is the height of naivety. Russia has significantly lower human resources compared to a possibly united Europe, so the outbreak of hostilities will very quickly lead to nuclear strikes against the enemy. Will someone in Europe risk sending troops into the territory of Ukraine, I think not. For this to happen, circumstances must arise when Russia is practically satisfied with the results achieved in the Northern Military District, the West and its ward Zelensky regime are on the verge of capitulation, but there is still no recognition of defeat. Negotiations began on the world order after the end of the Great Patriotic War. Our country has historically, while winning wars on the battlefield, been able to lose a lot at the negotiating table. The only question now is where Russia is ready to stop, what are the final goals. Let me remind you that the main goals were declared in December 2021. When in my address to NATO and the United States it was stated that we are ready to insist and seek a return to the situation of 1997. Thus, all waves of NATO expansion to the East are rolled back. This is the maximum plan.
  23. +1
    3 March 2024 09: 57
    IMHO, is the media preparing the population for a big war?
    The small victorious war did not come out, and now there are waves of PR about nuclear weapons, they say, let’s hit, let’s hit NATO, about depriving the rights and freedoms of all those who disagree, etc.

    Moreover, the elite are still threatening from their warm offices, the oligarchs are still going back and forth abroad, the billionaires are calmly withdrawing money and leaving citizenship (and they have taken someone else’s even more), but ordinary Russians will still pay the price for them?
    It turns out like this.
    1. 0
      3 March 2024 12: 31
      According to the Bible, the cause of all troubles is the sins of the people. There is no other one. Truth is the hardest thing for people to accept.

      But God is stronger, he will either crush or scatter. This happened to the Jews 2 thousand years ago. As soon as Christ was betrayed, 33 years later there was a war with Rome. With whom they really wanted to “make friends” before....
      And what happened to us sinners 33 years ago?
  24. 0
    5 March 2024 12: 32
    If he, the rooster, wants on his own, without NATO, to introduce his rooster troops into Ukraine, then why not deprive him of cities like Marseille and Le Havre as soon as he does this? What's easier is to use a couple of Poseidons for this purpose. What will all of France say to this Monsieur Debille? And this needs to be said openly and clearly. To say that we will not persuade, express protest, disappointment, concern or otherwise chew snot. Let's erase a couple of port cities in France to begin with, and what happens next depends on the behavior of this Makronchik.
  25. 0
    5 March 2024 19: 16
    Check and inventory of all Civil Defense facilities. All shops located in bomb shelters must be closed immediately. Conduct civil defense and emergency exercises so that people know where shelters are and know the procedure to act when an alarm is declared. THIS needs to be done IMMEDIATELY!
  26. 0
    7 March 2024 15: 18
    I would add this: We cannot hush up our losses; half of the population has mischief in their heads... Few people understand and perceive the realities and seriousness of the situation...

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"