What kind of assistance from the United States refused to Russia?

108
Recently, Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev signed a decree on the withdrawal of the Russian Federation from a cooperation agreement with the United States of America in terms of law enforcement and countering the spread of drugs. Thus, Russia and the United States within the framework of the agreement have worked together for a little over 10 years. It must be recalled that the agreement between Moscow and Washington was signed in the autumn of 2002. This is another termination of previous agreements with the United States, which the Russian authorities have taken over the past few months.

It is obvious that such a move of official Moscow can be considered a continuation of a series of recriminations and complaints that have long put an end to the so-called reset, which initially looked very, very promising. However, it should not be forgotten that Moscow has recently been forced into a relationship with Washington, let's say, to shoot back. For example, the ban on working in Russia for certain non-profit organizations is due to the fact that through these organizations money often came from the United States for outright sponsorship of destabilization activities on Russian territory. The resonant “law of Dima Yakovlev” was Moscow’s response to the “Magnitsky Act” that appeared in the United States, and the decision to withdraw the Russian Federation from the law enforcement cooperation and anti-drug activities was born after Washington announced that it’s withdrawing from the working group under bilateral presidential Commission for the Development of Democracy and Civil Society in Russia.

It is safe to say that today relations between Russia and the United States are among the most difficult in the last decade. At the same time, it seems that on the other side of the ocean, politicians play a kind of game, the main question of which today is expressed to what extent today one can, let's say, lead Russia, and to what extent relations between the two countries can still be worsened. The game began, and Russia took this game ... Then comes the ball effect for table tennis: you - me, I - you. It would seem that it is high time to stop and begin to get out of this clearly protracted meaningless undertaking, but today Washington is clearly not in the right place. The fact is that the United States, for several decades now, has simply failed to build partnerships with Russia if it begins to voice and defend its point of view. Washington is ready to call its friends and partners only those countries that sign in their unequivocal dependence on the United States, dependence — which comes to either servility or undisguised adulation.

And according to this, Russia of the 90-x model is an ideal, from the point of view of the United States, a state with which it is possible to build a “partner” policy: give a couple of billions of credits - and the trick is ... And then, you know, Russia has its own the voice begins to cut through - this is no good at all! .. It is necessary to urgently start the machine of acts, restrictions, lists, critical resolutions - in general, everything that is usually called the system of political reprimand from a state that perceives itself as the only and unshakable geopolitical all leader However in stories there was no unshakable human civilization ...
Let us return, nevertheless, to the document that Dmitry Medvedev signed. The agreement under which Russia and the United States were to conduct joint activities dealt with several points at once. The agreement of the model 2002 of the year, from which Russia has now withdrawn, contained clauses on joint counteraction to the spread of drugs, assistance in disclosing cybercrime, building barriers to terrorist activity. In addition, the agreement between Russia and the United States implied that Washington would help Russia in strengthening its borders and countering the legalization of proceeds from crime through corruption.

If you believe the official information, the agreement between the countries had a financial annex, in which the US role was designated as purely financial. In other words, Washington on the rights of a big brother allocated money, and Russia had to start this money to overcome existing problems in a relatively meager (by 2002 year, at least) financing.
It’s somehow strange, you see, it turns out ... The US signs a document implying cooperation with the country in the legal sphere, including in terms of combating corruption, and at the same time assumes a purely financial role. They gave money to fight corruption ... They put out the fire with gasoline ...

At the same time, part of the funds were transferred to certain funds that acted on the territory of Russia on behalf of and on behalf of the United States, and these funds were to use the funds received to resolve the issue of embezzlement in the Russian Federation. In the end, it all boiled down to the fact that the lion's share of funds was used only to ensure that NGOs that received them shouted loudly that corruption in Russia exists ... But, excuse me, we know this even without US-funded organizations. Then what, in fact, was the help with regard to Russia expressed? .. Only our protesting against all the so-called non-systemic opposition knows this answer:

Aha Our friends gave money to the Kremlin to fight corruption, and he, you know, he pocket the money, and even went out of the contract, so that the traces of ...

But only then let the same people who are supporters of the idea of ​​a purely “Kremlin trail” clarify: if the “friends” gave money, then why did the money work in some strange direction — they went exclusively to expanding the structures hiding behind loud anti-corruption names. Were these desktops "Horns and Hooves" solving completely different tasks? ..

The next direction of the bilateral activities of Russia and the United States under the 2002 agreement under review was countering the drug threat. At the same time, the more the USA “opposed” this threat, the greater the flow of the potion from Afghanistan to the Russian Federation and further to Europe. Strange ... It has always seemed that when counteracting a threat, this very threat should eventually disappear. And then it turned out the opposite.

Moreover, the American "help" to curb drug trafficking often went through certain organizations, on whose accounts the money settled, but not always then worked in exactly the direction that was for them, as indicated. In particular, you can hold a very interesting example of the strange cooperation of the US DEA (Anti-Narcotics Agency) and the Russian Federal Drug Control Service. Cooperation consisted in the fact that the representatives of the DEA tried to involve the employees of the Federal Service of the Russian Federation for Drug Control to destroy the goods already ready for transportation from the territory of Afghanistan. If the Federal Drug Control Service specialists stated that destroying finished narcotic products in Afghanistan is certainly great, but not as great as completely eliminating poppy plantations themselves, then the DEA immediately included "not understand yours." Like, if all poppy plantations are destroyed, then what will the Afghan peasants then exist, after all, the poppy can still be useful for baking cakes ... This was all the opposition to the drug business and was limited ...

We will not pass by another clause of the Russian-American treaty of the 2002 model of the year. This point concerns US assistance in combating child pornography. Washington allocated 100 thousands of dollars for these purposes ... At the same time, it remains a mystery how a country that is the leader of child porn industry (the United States accounts for more than half of the world's production of materials in the genre of child pornography) to help a country that was not in 2002 in the year KU for the production of products of such questionable content? It turned out that how else can! As a result, after a decade of "fraternal assistance" from the United States, Russia "safely" entered the top three world leaders in the production of child porn. Such, you understand, help in counteraction ...

It turns out that the agreement with the United States of America dated September 2002, in fact, only outwardly looked spectacular, and upon closer inspection, its fruits are very doubtful. Yes - Washington gave the money, but again to whom? Does anyone seriously think that - free of charge to the Russian budget ... Yes - the money for some accounts came to Russia, but what are the goals pursued by Washington in the end? Maybe corruption helped win? Maybe drug trafficking from Afghanistan stopped by joint actions? Maybe the child porn industry eliminated? What is there ... So far, just the opposite in all directions.

Based on this, they begin to torment vague doubts from such help ...
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

108 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Crescent
    -83
    February 1 2013
    Interesting conclusions, give you money, and even do the work for you :)
    "Proceeding from this, they are beginning to torment vague doubts from such help ..." But don't worry, our bureaucrats stole them, the Yankees turned out to be extreme, as always. No need to torment wink
    1. YARY
      +62
      February 1 2013
      During the "cooperation", the cultivation of poppy in Afghanistan and its traffic to Russia has increased many times.
      Yes, their "struggle" is impressive!
      1. Guran96
        +47
        February 1 2013
        "Cooperation"
        1. Stan badboy
          +52
          February 1 2013
          Refute somebody
          1. +2
            February 2 2013
            Quote: Stan Badboy
            Refute somebody

            I can’t refute, but along the way the amers miscalculated, they wanted to send to Russia, but it turned out to be home and we were connected to these deliveries through Ulyanovsk so that America would certainly not have passed bully
            1. Ivankun
              0
              February 5 2013
              I saw an American climbing with "good" freezing - chase him with pissing rags. (from)
          2. +1
            February 2 2013
            In this case, it is not in Russia, but in the income from drugs for the CIA. Langley lives with this money.
            1. scrack
              0
              February 3 2013
              The little shavens also have something to do with this, but they once waged opium wars with China
              1. 0
                February 4 2013
                Not without this, after all, they sent their red-haired "print" there to defend the interests of the House of Windsor - since they recognized him as their own, so let him work out.
        2. +3
          February 1 2013
          The Anglo-Saxons themselves all need to graze on gerych.
      2. +14
        February 1 2013
        Quote: Ardent
        During the "cooperation", the cultivation of poppy in Afghanistan and its traffic to Russia has increased many times.
        Alas, Russia is often only transit for transport to the EU ... If we continue to liberalize, we will get an even larger increase in drug trafficking
        1. 0
          February 1 2013
          Ulyanovsk for the transit of "cargo" NATO thinks for this and open.
          Separate unnecessary intermediaries from snickering Central Asia.
      3. +6
        February 1 2013
        Quote: Ardent
        Yes, their "struggle" is impressive!

        Greetings, Andrew! I will add a little:
        Number of opium poppy plantations in Afghanistan in 2012 increased by 20%, according to a published report by the United Nations (UN).

        However, the UN reports that opium production in the country in 2012. decreased by a third due to bad weather and plant diseases. Nevertheless, the increase in the price of opium encourages farmers to expand its production, despite the efforts of the government to eradicate this fishery, the BBC reports.
        hi
        Recall that in Afghanistan more than 90% of world opium is produced.
        1. YARY
          +18
          February 1 2013
          Victor! We will be healthy! hi
          Russia proposed to pollinate all fields with a special pesticide, harmless people and the plant grows itself, but opium is dumb from it!
          SyShyA denied us that kindness.
          1. +11
            February 1 2013
            They refused to refuse, but the "milk yield" decreased, the plant stopped giving the drug. We also have working structures, well done, devils
          2. +2
            February 1 2013
            Moreover, the more the US “counteracted this threat”, the greater the flow of potion went from Afghanistan to the Russian Federation and further to Europe.
            The last two words are very confusing for me.
            Further to Europe is Ukraine, Belarus, the western part of Russia from the Ural Mountains. SO? Or is it veiled "we read the west, we understand China and India and all of Southeast Asia"
            All the rest of the "Geyropets" have their own contingents and plots in the "paradise country" and make their own delivery for their needs.
          3. +2
            February 1 2013
            Of course, who will liquidate his instrument of fooling people and transforming them into biomass, that in the EU, that in other countries. hi
          4. mamba
            +2
            February 2 2013
            Quote: Ardent
            Russia proposed to pollinate all fields with a special pesticide

            These are most likely phenoxyacetic acid herbicides that suppress dicotyledonous plants, which include opium poppy. Pesticides of this type are poisonous enzymes. Under their action, part of the biological reactions in the poppy ceases to occur, and this leads to the death of plants or to loss of productivity. Those. alkaloids that make up the main narcotic substances of opium poppy are not produced: morphine, apomorphine, codeine, papaverine, thebaine, laudanine, narcotine, readin and others.
            In 2010, there was information about an air attack carried out by someone on poppy plantations. A substance was sprayed that caused massive damage to the poppy by mold. Afghans blame the Amers, and they nod to the Russians. As a result, the crop was hit hard, especially in the provinces of Helmand and Kandahar, which are the main producers of opium, and opium prices rose one and a half times.
            “The strains of the fungi fusarium oxysporum and pleospora papveracae are able to infect and kill coca, poppy and hemp. An indicator of the danger of using such fungi specially modified to affect the plants from which the drugs are made is the fact that their use is prohibited in the United States. Further investigation showed that their production and use borders on illegal. According to the data presented in the report of the Sunshine Project, genetically modified strains of the fungus were bred in the United States, which means that the resulting can be classified as a biological weapon.
            1. +3
              February 2 2013
              MORE THAN THERE WOULD SO IRRIGATE. EVEN IF OUR.
              The escadril of bomber shells with poured out airborne devices, still surely preserved from the time of the chem. WEAPONS AND BUSINESS IN A HAT.
      4. Moritz
        +1
        February 1 2013
        why cooperation in quotes? In my opinion, the Federal Drug Control Service is the only agency that has achieved impressive results in Russian-American relations.
      5. -3
        February 1 2013
        They want to change everything for bucks and the budding stuff!
      6. +2
        February 1 2013
        YARY, and if you come up from the other end and remember that the Taliban (no matter how scolding them) sow poppy outlawed! And Russia (or rather, our rulers again) got into the Afghan war on the side of the United States, helped to bring down the Taliban - that’s the result. When the USSR was head over heels in Afghanistan, it fed Afghanistan and there was no poppy, but the United States did not want to feed, and the Afghans wanted to eat.
        Well, they refused the contract, so what? Amer from this is not cold and not hot. Now, if Russia had banned importing and showing moronic and vile Hollywood films, there would have been a truly asymmetrical answer! But, unfortunately, no one reads our comments.
    2. +5
      February 1 2013
      Quote: Crescent
      But don’t worry, our bureaucrats plundered them, the Yankees, as always, were the last.

      Yeah, they plundered, and now decided that, perhaps, it’s enough, there’s nowhere to lay down and left the contract? Somehow it does not mold. In general, a self-respecting state should not take handouts for such purposes, these are national security issues and they must be resolved independently.
      1. Crescent
        -24
        February 1 2013
        The contract was valid for 10 years, it turns out we are not self-respecting state, once 10 years took handouts.
        1. serka3
          -20
          February 1 2013
          That's for sure
        2. +22
          February 1 2013
          Quote ... Crescent ...
          The contract was valid for 10 years, it turns out we are not self-respecting state, once 10 years took handouts.


          The "donations" went not to the Russian budget, but to "public legal organizations" not controlled by the country's government. You think on whose "grandmother" was Navalny's PR.? Think, "vyunosha", think!
          1. Crescent
            -3
            February 1 2013
            Quote: askort154
            The "donations" went not to the Russian budget, but to "public legal organizations" not controlled by the country's government. You think on whose "grandmother" was Navalny's PR.? Think, "vyunosha", think!
            So is Navalny signed the contract in 2002? Why aren't the words about this in the article? Thank you, after your message, everything has changed radically!
            1. +9
              February 1 2013
              Quote..Crescent ... So this is Navalny signed the contract in 2002? Why aren't the words about this in the article? Thank you, after your message, everything has changed radically!

              You are welcome ! And the treaty was signed to please the West, under the auspices of "compliance
              human rights in Russia. "As for Navalny, somewhere, in those days he
              studied at Yale University (USA !!!).
              1. Crescent
                -12
                February 1 2013
                Quote: askort154
                And the agreement was signed to please Western pressure.
                All the same, I would like clarity. WHO WAS THE AGREEMENT SIGNED? BULKY? Where this citizen studied I have little interest, at least at Yale, at least at Uryupinsky universities.
                1. +4
                  February 1 2013
                  Who cares who signed up?
                  It would be d..mo and then the flies will fly by themselves.
                2. +2
                  February 1 2013
                  Quotation ... A crescent moon .... I would still like to have clarity WHERE THE AGREEMENT WAS SIGNED? BULKY? Where this citizen studied I have little interest, at least at Yale, at least at Uryupinsky universities.

                  If you mean NPOs, then the first law was adopted (DG, under Yeltsin,
                  in 1995. (For the sake of the West) But, if you are interested in politics, then not knowing the education of "opposition leaders" (like Navalny), excuse me, smells of ignorance.
                  1. Crescent
                    -6
                    February 1 2013
                    Quote: askort154
                    then not knowing the education of "opposition leaders" (like Navalny), sorry, it smells of ignorance
                    Are you a fan of Navalny? Do you know his biography thoroughly? Horror wild. However, the point is not in Navalny, but in those who signed the contract in 2002, and in 2012 terminated it. If I’m not mistaken, it’s the same face inflated with botex. Actually, and to hell with him with the contract. But this statement of the question - I manal your name day, confuses me. 10 years they took money and bowed at the legs, but then they became a proud and inaccessible girl ?!
                    1. wax
                      +1
                      February 2 2013
                      In 2002, there was still no reason not to trust the Americans and, accordingly, the conditions, but now there is every reason and, accordingly, the conditions to send them in whole and in particular to three letters according to their abbreviation. Now let him try to constructively shout the fifth column led by his employer
                3. Denis_SF
                  +1
                  February 1 2013
                  Quote: Crescent
                  All the same, I would like clarity. WHO WAS THE AGREEMENT SIGNED? BULKY? Where this citizen studied I have little interest, at least at Yale, at least at Uryupinsky universities.

                  Don’t be so naive! Well, everyone understands who was signed. You just don’t have to be so direct and look for answers to the surface. Diplomacy is a delicate thing, in order to take two steps forward, you need to take a step back and always sacrifice something .. If he had not signed at the time, he was promised to sign, who knows, he would have survived even the first term, but now you can send sworn friends with their miraculously profitable contracts and funds.
        3. +1
          February 1 2013
          Someone on these handouts corrected their personal interests.
    3. +9
      February 1 2013
      Quote ... Crescent
      Interesting conclusions, give you money, and even do the work for you:

      Turn on the logic. Why would Americans give away their beloved dollar to a country of a potential adversary for this? A kind, kind, Uncle Sam.? And why did Grandma Clinton, in her last words, gritting her teeth, accuse Russia of precisely this — the prohibition of NPOs? Logically, we should be glad that the budgetary funds of our people will be more intact. But no, they have something else in mind! And it can be seen not armed
      eye, and they, brazenly, do not hide it, mistaking everyone for idiots.
      1. Crescent
        -7
        February 1 2013
        I turned on the logic, by the way, the offset in the diploma for her beloved is worth it.
        Quote: askort154
        Why would Americans give away their beloved dollar to a country of a potential adversary for this?
        Why do we need to take dollars for 10 years, and then make an innocent girl out of ourselves? Something doesn’t agree with something.
        1. +2
          February 1 2013
          Quote..Crescent] And why do we need to take dollars for 10 years, and then make an innocent girl out of ourselves? Something doesn’t agree with something.

          Well, what are you ....?! Once again, the state did not take dollars. Americans, under the guise of donations, drove dollars to non-commercial organizations (NPOs),
          who were involved, including political activities.
          press them (Putin in 2002), the western "howl" arose incredible.
          Putin, a dictator, wants to cut short the charitable financial support of human rights NGOs in wild Russia.
          I had to give in to such pressure, and in 2002, the law was "refreshed", and
          in 2012, they did a "circumcision", so Clinton was spitting saliva.
          1. +2
            February 1 2013
            I would also suggest as a channel for corruption (to bribe Russian officials).
            The Americans, controlling the flow of money, could choose - to whom to give them - they also controlled the expense.
            Even if the money went to some state structure, only the Americans decided how to spend it - i.e. if it was necessary for someone to pay a bribe, then they simply officially allocated a certain amount from the fund to the right place and turned a blind eye to the further fate of this money.
            A very convenient channel for financing subversion.
            Apparently the security services finally figured it out and blocked it.
        2. +2
          February 1 2013
          Why do we need to take 10 dollars for years, and then make an innocent girl out of ourselves? Something doesn't match

          everything is very simple. Some prime minister arrives in the USA or Europe, asks for something (loans, transport access, remove any embargoes or sell a chip there). And they politely explain to him - you have very bad business with freedoms there (transparency, electronic access, corruption, healthcare, etc.). Therefore, we will help you - sign an agreement, and our Congress will soften. Or go on the fuy and don’t come again.
          That's all. Want to build a terminal in some France or Holland - sign it. Begin to make yourself a real kid - go home ... make one.
      2. 0
        February 1 2013
        Quote: askort154
        ‡ P RїRѕS RμRјSѓ ° F ± F P ° ± RєR RљR "RoRЅS,RѕRЅ, PI SЃRІRѕS'Rј RїRѕSЃR" RμRґRЅRμRј SЃR "RѕRІRμ, SЃRєSЂRμRїSЏ P · ° F ± SѓR RјRo, RѕR ± RІRoRЅRoR" P ° F RѕSЃSЃRoSЋ RoRјRμRЅRЅRѕ PI SЌS, РѕРј - Р · Р ° прете РќРљРћ.?

        Everything is correct! Withdrew from the contract, NGOs kicked out of the country! On the one hand, the stream of bucks was blocked for our "activists", on the other, the path for "Western activists" was closed
    4. Perch_xnumx
      +1
      February 1 2013
      Interesting conclusions, give you money, and even do the work for you :)
      "Proceeding from this, they are beginning to torment vague doubts from such help ..." But don't worry, our bureaucrats stole them, the Yankees turned out to be extreme, as always. No need to torment


      cit:
      - Afghanistan today produces 2 times more heroin than the whole world produced 10 years ago. That is, in this country, 94% of the production of all heroin is localized. Therefore, the heroin that is produced there, of course, cannot be consumed there, and further in the form of drug trafficking it moves in three main directions. One of them is the so-called northern route, it is also called the northern silk road, in view of the fact that we and Afghanistan are practically not separated by well-equipped borders. Because after the disintegration of the Soviet Union, these borders never existed, and they are still poorly equipped. Therefore, the drug, heroin, smoothly glides here in our direction. We estimate this as about 50% of the volume of production that goes to Russia. The remaining 50% is approximately equally divided between the Balkan route and the southern one. If the Balkan is sent to the countries of the European Union, then the southern one is Pakistan, India and further spread across the seas around the world.
    5. +2
      February 1 2013
      Everyone sees in the article what he wants. And phrases
      Quote:] At the same time, part of the funds was transferred to certain funds that operated on the territory of Russia on behalf of and on behalf of the United States, and these funds had to use the funds received to solve the issue of embezzlement on the territory of the Russian Federation. In the end, it all came down to the fact that the lion's share of the funds was used only so that the NGOs that received them scream out loud that there is corruption in Russia ... But, excuse me, we even know this without US-funded organizations. Then what, in fact, was help expressed in relation to Russia? .. Only our protesting against all and the so-called non-systemic opposition know the answer to this question: [/ quote

      and phrases


      Quote:] We will not pass by one more clause of the Russian-American treaty of 2002. This item refers to US assistance in the fight against child pornography. Washington allocated as much as 100 thousand dollars for these goals ... At the same time, it remained a mystery how a country that is a leader in the child porn industry (the United States accounts for more than half of the world production of materials in the genre of child pornography) can help a country that in 2002 was not included in the 20- ku for the production of products of such dubious content? It turned out that even as it can! As a result, after a decade of "fraternal assistance" from the United States, Russia "safely" entered the top three world leaders in the production of child porn [/ quote



      You didn’t notice something. And you didn’t notice them?
      1. enot555
        0
        February 1 2013
        AND HOW MUCH WAS YOU PAYED? or do you take heroin?
    6. +2
      February 1 2013
      you see from those paid to Russia yapping.
      1. Crescent
        -11
        February 1 2013
        Quote: Dmitry
        you see from those paid to Russia yapping.
        Well, firstly, do not poke me! Secondly, I did not receive the above-mentioned money from the United States, I received their state structures, which now expressed dissatisfaction with the low funding, based on the contents of the article, and which the same money was stolen.
        1. Denis_SF
          +1
          February 1 2013
          Quote: Crescent
          Well, firstly, do not poke me!

          Mr. accomplice of the decaying west turned to personality, to see touched for the living.
    7. -6
      February 1 2013
      True gogolish, crescent!
    8. +2
      February 1 2013
      our bureaucrats plundered them, the Yankees, as always, were the extreme.

      Crescent, you are completely off topic, otherwise you would not write nonsense. America does not give money to officials. Any help to any country in the world has the following design:
      The State Department allocates money for the program.
      The program employs American NGOs that will deal with this problem from America.
      American NGOs, through the US Embassy, ​​are building a system of so-called Operators - organizations that will lead the projects. For example, USAID, which just worked in Russia.
      These organizations either spend money themselves or hire citizens to promote them.

      The double benefit - type money gave us, but American organizations spend it. Naturally. primarily to their employees.

      Something like this. If interested, I can write in more detail.
      1. Crescent
        0
        February 1 2013
        Quote: Botanologist
        Something like this. If interested, I can write in more detail.
        Be so kind, I’m especially interested in what kind of NGOs in Russia were involved in law enforcement ?! If you find a law allowing NGOs to conduct operational investigative activities, I will take my words back. In the meantime
        Quote: Botanologist
        otherwise they would not write nonsense
        . Something like this.
        1. +3
          February 1 2013
          I'm especially interested in what NGOs in Russia were involved in law enforcement

          You confuse warm with soft.
          They give money for the fight against drugs to some NGO. This NGO goes to the police or drug control and says - gentlemen, we are implementing an international project to combat drugs. During this project, leading world experts will give you lectures, develop regulations, help with material support - they will buy paper for printers and computers for superiors. Maybe some breathalyzers. Bonus for good behavior - management will go on an internship to Denmark, Norway, Greece and where we will send.
          Since this is all approved by the government and supervised by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, no one blunders.
          Then experts come from whom 5-6 polish the Muscovite, and 3-4 are busy with their special affairs. Which - not our dog business. Special.

          Well, that's all. The police are trained, the budget has been mastered, the bosses have been trained by nowhere. Everyone is happy.
          What else interests you?
          1. Crescent
            -2
            February 2 2013
            Quote: Botanologist
            What else interests you?
            Nothing. I have not read more delirium in my life. NGOs are involved in law enforcement belay This is paranoia!
            1. 0
              February 2 2013
              I never read more nonsense in my life

              Well, something you reading is not very successful. I have described the scheme of work of NGOs. Where you saw law enforcement, I did not understand. Try to get enough sleep and read again.
              If you think that the United States will bring its border guards or drug control to us under this agreement, that's for sure ... what you said.
              In short, learn the materiel, and then reason.
              1. Crescent
                0
                February 2 2013
                Quote: Botanologist
                I have described the scheme of work of NGOs.
                Calmly. You don’t worry, it’s harmful. Take a deep breath, exhale slowly. And most importantly, forget about NPOs, they have a bad effect on your nervous system.

                Quote: Botanologist
                Where did you see law enforcement, I still do not understand
                That's it, that's it darling. What is the article written about? About cooperation in law enforcement, for some reason you remembered NGOs. But the most important thing you have done is to acknowledge, and this is already great progress.
    9. 0
      February 2 2013
      The United States does not give money to anyone just like that ... and if they give it only for their own goals, known only to them, and under strict control ... So friends should not be mistaken and any agreement that the United States offers is necessary for a pack of lawyers to study it for a month before signing, but this does not happen because the contract partner really needs "green candy wrappers" .... And in general, these naive Russians think that someone will just give them money ...
    10. Cyrus
      0
      February 2 2013
      Since the contract was a formality, why withdraw from it ?? They would continue to receive money and were engaged in a real fight against drugs. The Euro Union is also interested in stopping traffic through Russia. Let them get paid!
    11. 0
      February 7 2013
      You are sorry but why the same Yankees do not leave the rest of the world alone.
      stop
  2. ramsi
    +1
    February 1 2013
    the only agreement that, in general, could be signed with the Americans is a ceasefire
    1. Fox
      +10
      February 1 2013
      Quote: ramsi
      the only agreement that, in general, could be signed with the Americans is a ceasefire

      about the surrender of America.
    2. Cheloveck
      +6
      February 1 2013
      Quote: ramsi
      the only agreement that, in general, could be signed with the Americans is a ceasefire

      Actually, about their complete surrender. laughing
    3. +5
      February 1 2013
      Quote: ramsi
      The only agreement that could be signed with the Americans is a ceasefire
      Yeah .. only for this it needed to be opened ... Let's say together thanks to the first president of a free and democratic Russia for our happy present ... They buried in time ... damn it ...
  3. +7
    February 1 2013
    If experts of the Federal Drug Control Service claimed that destroying finished narcotic products in Afghanistan is certainly great, but not as great as completely eliminating poppy plantations themselves, then the DEA immediately included “I don’t understand yours” ....-- and it was necessary to begin, 50% of the presence of Western troops in the territory of the DRA was only based on the protection and cultivation of poppies
    1. Crescent
      0
      February 1 2013
      Maxim, for some reason, the author forgot to mention that the FSKN together with the Americans destroyed factories, and not just finished products, on the territory of the DRA. Why so much forgetfulness?
      1. Gendalf
        +5
        February 1 2013
        And what do these plants look like? A fenced area with workshops and infrastructure, or a couple of adobe huts? Just in the second case, their destruction will also not affect the production of drugs, they destroyed two, they arranged ten new ones in a day.
      2. 101
        101
        +4
        February 1 2013
        And the fact that before the arrival of the USSR the production was abroad and now in Afghanistan itself it would be something to destroy or something
      3. +3
        February 1 2013
        Quote: Crescent
        Maxim, for some reason, the author forgot to mention that the FSKN together with the Americans destroyed factories, and not just finished products, on the territory of the DRA. Why so much forgetfulness?

        Destruction of plants will not lead to anything until there will be poppy plantation growth. And production can be set up within a few hours, it would be raw materials.
      4. 0
        February 1 2013
        Crescent,
      5. +3
        February 1 2013
        Quote: Crescent
        Americans destroyed factories, not just finished products, in the DRA. Why so much forgetfulness?

        One plant was destroyed and trumpeted about it to the whole world, and quietly the hundred remaining were modernized and a hundred new were created.
    2. +4
      February 1 2013
      Quote: maksim
      50% of the presence of Western troops in the territory of the DRA is only based on the protection and cultivation of poppies
      Everyone understands this, only no one wants to agree .. And drug trafficking has increased through the use of military transportation channels ...
      The Americans are really addicted to drugs in Afghanistan, it’s harder than we used to be to char and get out without losing face ...
    3. bezumnyiPIT
      +2
      February 1 2013
      Of course, it is extremely beneficial for the Americans to "protect" the Afghan drug plant and receive a big bonus, in the form of huge profits, from the sale of heroin to the whole world, intoxicating and decomposing the masses of the potential enemy
    4. Cpa
      0
      February 1 2013
      Of course, when Afghanistan was a zone of Soviet interests, cotton was grown there.
  4. +3
    February 1 2013
    Americans know how to count money .. It's a fact ... And just like that they don’t give anything to anyone. What is written in the article is known to everyone ... Americans supported agents of influence and direct opposition ...
    The decision to exit was made possible simply because in the wallet a little coin rang
    1. +2
      February 1 2013
      Quote: older
      The decision to exit was made possible simply because in the wallet a little coin rang

      even so - that's the right decision!!!
  5. SASCHAmIXEEW
    +5
    February 1 2013
    In Afghanistan, the Yankees are sitting in garrisons, instead of destroying poppy crops, and this is a fight against drugs, how many times have poppy cultivated areas increased over 10 years? And most of them come to us, they poison us, they kill us with drugs! Whatever they do, look for the Trojan horse !! They are our enemies, I mean those who rule, the liquidationist Freemasonry banking bigwigs, for them the main thing is loot, but what about direct death for them .....?
  6. +8
    February 1 2013
    Good morning. hi everybody!

    Review written by good (Greetings hi Alexey) so that everything is laid out as they say. On the shelves!
    So what do we have.
    1. quote- "Let's go back, nevertheless, to the document signed by Dmitry Medvedev."
    here I would like to emphasize especially. one point, although the document is signed by D.A. Medvedev, the initiator without a doubt, the decision to take this and previous documents (the Dima Yakovlev Law, the Law on Non-Commercial Organizations) is, of course, V.V. Putin. it is he.
    2. Based on the logic of the first paragraph, I immediately ask a question. What prevented this and previous documents from being accepted earlier. Or did you have to wait for the US attacks ?!
    3. Why did Russia need this help what could it be that in the colossal budget of the country there wouldn’t be a couple of million rubles to implement those moments that were laid down in the canceled agreement.
    4. And finally, the last one. To summarize all the above, I want to emphasize that the conclusion of the agreement is from the 2002 year. there was no need at all. If there is no need, then why did they conclude ?!
    1. +2
      February 1 2013
      If this agreement is not beneficial for us, then why did you need to sign it at all? Even after they signed 10 years, they thought to leave or not! request Some garbage turns out!
      1. 0
        February 1 2013
        It’s just that in those days, any bilateral agreement on cooperation between the Russian Federation and the United States in any area was more a political move that determines the process of establishing relations between countries. And the more significant the agreement, or rather, the more global and important the task was posed, the more advantages were put into the basket of bilateral relations. At least that should have been so. But the Americans, for their part, besides the appearance of improving relations, did nothing else, and each such agreement was used to solve their internal interests. In short, all this is a deception on their part and a bluff.
  7. EvilDentist
    +9
    February 1 2013
    who long ago put an end to the so-called reboot, which initially looked very, very promising
    Is this for whom it looked promisingly ?? For me personally, this initially looked like a Gorbachev-type divorce. Only here the leadership didn’t really make promises and candy wrappers, it didn’t make many unilateral concessions - although it pretended to be cunning from time to time :) - which ultimately, in the medium term, provided and will provide several more cloves to the uncle’s coffin
    1. +4
      February 1 2013
      God, what unhappy women. They themselves are not happy, they are just very sorry.
  8. +30
    February 1 2013


    As recently as yesterday appeared on the Internet.
    1. +5
      February 1 2013
      Citizens themselves will have to pacify drug addicts, only the police (filthy faces) are only allowed to beat pogans
      1. Gur
        +3
        February 1 2013
        Of course, for ourselves, because our affairs with drug addiction are not so bad and alcohol tolerant, we smoke a lot, judging by the fierce fight against smoking, this is an archaeological issue, more important than anything else. Moreover, in this struggle, as always, they are approached from the leeward side.
      2. TUMAN
        +4
        February 1 2013
        Quote: valokordin
        Citizens themselves will have to pacify drug addicts, only the police (filthy faces) are only allowed to beat pogans

        And here are the addicts? They are not to be pacified; they are victims; they need to be treated. The victims of the genocide, which has been going on for more than twenty years, are walking in broad sweeps across the republics of the former union. And the most suffering nation is the Slavs. Look around and you will see ads of alcohol, tobacco, low-alcohol drinks and energy drinks, all aimed at you and your children. The authorities do not struggle with this, it is beneficial for them, or such a plan. The militia or the police, the difference is small, roofs the points selling drugs, drug addicts, points selling fake, or smuggled alcohol and smoking mixtures. All this action is encouraged by the West, and by Zionist organizations both in Russia and Ukraine. Here is a link to the plan of the well-known Zionist-Habadnik. I haven’t opened America for you, you all probably already read it, but nevertheless I will try to focus attention on this.
        http://baloven.info/stati/menaxem-shneerson-nashi-plany-otnositelno-slavyan/
    2. lexa patriot
      +6
      February 1 2013
      IMPRESSIVE.
      I buried my girlfriend’s son, too, an overdose of drugs (the kid was 12 years old, would live and still live)
      Crush drug dealers OVER ALL AVAILABLE WAYS)
      1. +11
        February 1 2013
        In the Kuban, Cossack patrols have been doing this for a long time, and quite successfully the majority of police officers are only FOR !, such actions are nothing to say about ordinary citizens.
    3. Gur
      +2
      February 1 2013
      In principle, everything is correct, only why should you behave like a pig yourself, or there were no trash cans nearby, you just want to say "Respect the work of the cleaners"
    4. w.ebdo.g
      +4
      February 1 2013
      Aventurinka, thanks for the video!
      very effective way.
      not constitutional? but it works great!
      you need to take for the gills first a promoter that distributes ads, then warn cops in the subway so that they do not interfere with a preventive conversation with the merchant, then give it to them gentle, let them earn stars)))
      come to get a job as a promoter and it’s advisable to take all the people from training with a chance (athletes do not like drug addicts) and arrange a small pogrom at an advertising agency.
      this will be a good decision.
      not constitutional? let them be afraid!
      I think so.
      1. w.ebdo.g
        +11
        February 1 2013
        Here's another video in the subject)))

        1. w.ebdo.g
          +1
          February 1 2013
          Published by 31.01.2013
          In Moscow, a large-scale special operation codenamed "Tin" took place. FSKN employees liquidated a large network selling so-called spice and synthetic drugs. 80 underground points were closed, where they traded prohibited substances and seized tens of kilograms of dangerous smoking mixtures. "Tin" as it is, in the report of Konstantin Hitz.



          apparently all the same they took up drug dealers
        2. enot555
          +2
          February 1 2013
          GOOD GUYS, BUT THERE IS A LITTLE BUT. WHERE THAT THEY WILL HAVE A PURCHASED COP OR A SELLING RANGE WHICH WILL BE PREPARED BY THEM. CONSEQUENTLY NEED ANOTHER APPROACH !!! am
          FIRST BLOCK THE CAR, ANY WAYS!
          AND THEN INSTEAD OF STICKERS ADD 3-4 COCKTAILS OF HAMMER OR OTHER FIRE MIXTURE TYPE OF HOME TERMIT (FUN WILL THEM) laughing
          And THOSE WHO CLEAR OUT, SIMPLY TO ADD.
          THEN THESE JACKALS ARE CONSIDERED. THEREFORE, AGAIN, AGAIN IN THE FRAME OF THE MONKEY WITH AN ACCENT TO THE VAZ 21099, IT IS ALSO COCKTAILED TO RECOGNIZE THEM.
          MORE, GUYS BECOME FACES DO NOT LIGHT ON VIDEO,
          HOPE FOR GOD AND LOAD THE CUTTING OFF !!! am
      2. +3
        February 1 2013
        Quote: w.ebdo.g
        then give it to them gentle, let them earn stars)))


        As life experience shows, cops on such traders earn not stars, but money ... Tribute for quiet work "on the spot". Hand him over to the cops - in half an hour he will be free and without any protocols.
        There is one way out - to wet ourselves as far as possible (but without death).
        And if you take it to the authorities, then only with wide coverage on the network - be sure to shoot a video and upload it to the network! In this case, the cops should know that the fact is fixed and will be widely publicized.
        In this war, the benefits of uncensored Internet on our side!
        1. w.ebdo.g
          +1
          February 1 2013
          vadimN, I agree, you should conduct a video protocol transferring the dealer into the hands of the cops. indicating the position, rank and unit of the cop.
          and immediately explain that this cop will be a YouTube star tomorrow)))
          some also suggest tacking the dealer's entire forehead, but this is not at all constitutional, but there is no need to beat and maim.
          After all, we have democracy, therefore, we must offer a choice - we beat the litto, or a tattoo. so that by agreement everything was)))
          I think so.
          1. Dikremnij
            +1
            February 1 2013
            A tattoo can be brought out, it is better as in the old days - Brand with a red-hot iron. Yes, and it is advisable to increase the time for the spread of drugs.
    5. enot555
      +2
      February 1 2013
      The guys are great, it is necessary, it’s bad that passers-by didn’t react, but had to just break the jackal. And here's what is interesting ------ again these "cute" jackals with manes, representatives of the oppressed tribe !! I would have shortened his mane !!! am
      this is a leash small example: fucking monkeys !!!
    6. MG42
      +3
      February 1 2013
      In Ukraine, smoking mixtures until recently were quite legally sold in kiosks. Now the Internet is full of such synthetic rubbish.
      Here's a photo kiosk as an example

      but the goods
    7. Dikremnij
      +2
      February 1 2013
      The video is excellent, but not always everything turns out so fun: my classmate stuffed the face of two teenagers in his entrance because they sold grass in his doorway, and their "buyers" "without leaving the cash register" used it. As a result, a criminal case was opened against my friend for inflicting lungs. I had to skidovatsya to smear recourse
      This is our justice ...
  9. +7
    February 1 2013
    Agreeing with the Americans on the fight against drugs is the same as with the Colombian drug lords.
  10. +5
    February 1 2013
    EvilDentist,
    Pancake belay ..... and you didn’t think that people at lunch can read it ....... sows for a walk No.
    1. +1
      February 1 2013
      I also enjoy your meal))
  11. +2
    February 1 2013
    Great article. Thank you, Alex.
    None, it turns out, and not Newton's binomial - this "American help".
    Not in vain in preference and there is such a concept.
    As they say - you will go by the wool, you will come back shorn.
    With such "helpers".
    That's right.
  12. Oren
    +3
    February 1 2013
    Still, they would have left PACE and refused other completely empty agreements (WTO and other crap, where Russia pays only awesome membership dues)
  13. +2
    February 1 2013
    If the FSKN experts stated that destroying finished narcotic products in Afghanistan is certainly great, but not as great as completely eliminating poppy plantations themselves, then DEA immediately included “I don’t understand yours.” Like, if all poppy plantations are destroyed, then what then will the Afghan peasants exist, because poppy can still be useful for baking them ...

    Opium poppy is different from ordinary food poppy, like an orange from grapefruit, there are also different varieties with hemp. For medicine, food, light and textile industries.
  14. 0
    February 1 2013
    Quote: Aventurinka
    As recently as yesterday appeared on the Internet.

    Ai BABY !!!!!
  15. +3
    February 1 2013
    I just didn’t understand what is the meaning of Pin *** tan to blame that we took 3rd place in child porn, we let the situation go by chance, we ourselves are to blame, but for the rest +
  16. pa_nik
    +2
    February 1 2013
    "The United States is upset by Russia's decision to withdraw from the agreement on cooperation in law enforcement and drug control and considers this decision a failure." RIA Novosti http://ria.ru/world/20130130/920551051.html

    Amer squeaked, which means we are moving in the right direction. fellow
    Still to be activated comrades in Colombia ... lol so that the states were not up to hegemony.
  17. Region65
    +7
    February 1 2013
    I’ll explain my point of view (you can throw tomatoes at me - just fresh pzhalsta, bottles of vodka and cucumbers for a snack :))). and so - the real reasons for the eternal occupation of Afghanistan by world powers - in ancient times, Russia (then tsarist) and Small Brotherhoods (then also imperial) took turns occupying the territory of Afghanistan, periodically staging a mess there ... what's the reason? Yes, it’s very simple - a trade route goes through Afghanistan, so they fought for control of this way .... time has passed, now everything revolves around drugs. Naturally, no one needs half-naked, half-wild, half-educated aborigines with Kalash on camels. (it should be noted here that those who say that the USSR prosralized the war in Afghanistan are just a dumb fool, because the USSR did not have the task of CONQUERING this fly (as Mr. Serebryakov blurted out in the ninth company, that no one ever says :))))) ... and so the Soviet Union aimed primarily at increasing the number of communist countries in the world and shutting down drug flows .... now the amers are under the pretext of searching for Benladen, his children and spermatozoa (God forbid, they clone: ))) they simply simply protect their plantations of drugs there. Look for someone who benefits :) and who benefits? The Rockefellers and the Rhodschilds, who essentially rule the United States, it is drugs that are the main source of income for these two rich clans, plus there is also a little family in the United Kingdom (royal naturally) who also receives a lot of money from drugs. Oil and gas are little things compared to drug trafficking. So do not help pseudo-friends guard their plantations.
    1. borisst64
      +1
      February 1 2013
      Quote: Region65
      trade route goes through Afghanistan

      Where is going? In Russia? Or maybe to England? Afghan will do drugs, but not transit.
      The occupation of Afghanistan is a banal division of the world between the powers.
      1. Region65
        +5
        February 1 2013
        where does he go?))) Well, what a question - to Europe, to Asia, wherever there are paths. It's elementary :))) why the heck is a desert with bumps for the USA? yes they do not need it, they need plantations and control over the supply of drugs)))) and it is no secret for anyone who earns on this drug - the Rockefellers, Rockchilds, and so on already named by me))) it is clear that Afghan does not transit , it is led by the United States and other "business partners"))) By the way, all these pigs (B. Gates, Rockefeller, Buffet, Soros) at one time decided that the world's population should be reduced ... including the decision to make women all over the world with the sick and crippled children ... with the help of what? by vaccinations .... proof? easy - I worked for three years in one of the sanitary and epidemiological services and I assure you - when there is a routine vaccination of the population (from influenza and other fictitious diseases), NOT ANYONE! I repeat again NONE of the employees of the sanitary epidemiological services, health care institutions DOES THESE VACCINATIONS TO HIMSELF !!! think.
  18. bdolah
    +3
    February 1 2013
    What kind of help in FIG, the main drug trafficking in the world is organized by the CIA.
  19. anchonsha
    +5
    February 1 2013
    With the help of the USA, no matter how it comes to us, we are already fed up to capacity. Therefore, let us live within our means, and let us expel liberalism with their Western values. then we will have order.
  20. bap063
    +4
    February 1 2013
    Never the USA, let alone the West reconcile with what Russia has!
    and they will never be our partners, let alone friends, is this a fact?
    therefore, our president did everything and is doing it right, and he understands this more than anyone else. why is he behaving so far so, at the moment so far and you have to behave towards them?
    Give the deadline and it is slowly coming, it will force Russia and Russia to respect its homeland, no one doubts that, and all of them missed their chance when the country was ruled by a bald man and with a drunk, (relaxed and thought that Russia had won?) Putin came and they shuddered back and they got back a hare soul, under a tiger cape? Never and no one to defeat Russia and its people, and even more so with such a leader! And this frightens them even more, but the elbow is close, but now you won’t get it, is that a question? and from that they now have incontinence, and from fear of the future they will gradually pass into hysteria! Russia after the First World War and during the Civil War (everyone rose and became rich on Russian gold, after the reign of Gorbach and Yeltsin they became even more rich, and they already thought that everything was with Russia, but no!
  21. borisst64
    0
    February 1 2013
    "Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev signed a decree on the withdrawal of the Russian Federation from the treaty"

    But isn't the president signing such documents?
  22. 0
    February 1 2013
    Well, on the example of Afghanistan, we just see this fight against drugs. The Americans are fighting, just to take control of the drug traffic in their hands. I find no other explanation for their presence in Afghanistan. And in light of Obama’s recent agreement with the President of Pakistan on the release of the Taliban from prisons, even more so.
    1. Region65
      0
      February 2 2013
      well, everything is like in a pharmacy) well, or rather, like in a normal market economy ... like we have in the 90s))) there are larger plantations that are kept by the Americans, which bring the named clans of rich people stable and huge profits ... but there is small plantations, which are trying to keep local "peasants" and bandits, well, what would be something to live on ... and so this trifle is exponentially filtered, burned, trampled and destroyed, and their plantations are fertilized, guarded and cherished :)
  23. 0
    February 1 2013
    This is another termination of previous agreements with the United States, which the Russian authorities have made over the past few months.

    Well and rightly, for a long time it was necessary to destroy this "Trojan horse". It was not for nothing that the ancients said: "Fear Danians bringing gifts." However, it was probably difficult to do before, since there was a fairly strong pro-American lobby in the government, and maybe for some other reason. In any case, a step (cancellation of this agreement) in the right direction. good
  24. OLe OLeg
    0
    February 1 2013
    Another stupid propaganda.
  25. +4
    February 1 2013
    The article is correct, the author - respect.
    In fact:
    Americans in their repertoire and grandmothers they only to achieve their filthy goals!
    That they protect poppy fields is a no brainer. That ours is not allowed to the sources is also understandable. By the way, the destruction of finished opium is a good thing, and if there is an opportunity to participate in it, then it is necessary. At the same time, the Russian Federation is selling Mi-17 helicopters supposedly for the needs of the Afghan army. Who is this smart deal organized ?! In the mountains for transporting opium transport you can imagine no better. And these two Afghan types of soldiers will be pawned on foot.
    Europe suddenly began to recover from the crisis. Greece was given money and in general ... And where did they get the money? What has changed so much? Productivity increased, launched new plants or what ??? Pensions were lowered, social programs were reduced - but not by the same amount! With sound thinking, this is not a clean matter. Is drug trafficking grandmother? Another, unfortunately, is not visible. Everything goes through Europe, greasy hands - that’s sticking. Well, if someone sits or dies, the money does not smell.
    As for the FSKN. I don’t know how in the regions, but near St. Petersburg, gypsy villages stand and flourish. Everyone knows that on drugs - only the Federal Drug Control Service does not know. We would have strangled the internal bastard - and the transshipment bases would have been filled up, the traffic would have decreased. How many people would be saved from this infection - both here and abroad! Once you can't get to Afghanistan, you can at least put things in order! But "The great people have no strength!" Or is the FSKN, under cover of complete secrecy, supposedly for operational purposes, sold out and it's time to bring it out into the open !? There is nothing to do with foreign money. We have to figure it out ourselves.
  26. +7
    February 1 2013
    No comments . There is nothing to add. And to repeat ...
    1. +2
      February 1 2013
      Look and envy Colombia, even cucumbers grow here wassat
  27. 0
    February 1 2013
    ... And then, you know, Russia has its own voice begins to erupt - it’s no good !..


    This is the lot of Limitroph to lick something from the USA. And it's time for us to snap back. We must live by our standards. And if someone does not like this, then let him go to the panel and sell for cheap.
  28. gen.meleshkin
    +1
    February 1 2013
    Amerikosy initially had to deploy a wide network of NGOs, so they financed subversive offices under a plausible pretext. It is clear from the outset that the American Wolves ALWAYS pull on sheep's clothing. This is called a military trick. MILITARY!
  29. EmiGRANT
    +1
    February 1 2013
    In the near abroad, already about 8 years ago they talked about an increase in the flow of drugs through Russia, thanks to the arrival of the states in Afghanistan, and by the way, there was a noticeable increase in the number of young people and schoolchildren hollowed out in the evenings on the streets in a similar period of time.
    The leadership of Russia well done !!! It is a pity that it was not possible to do this before.
  30. +1
    February 1 2013
    and the decision to withdraw the Russian Federation from the agreement on cooperation in law enforcement and anti-drug activities was born after Washington announced that he was leaving the working group under the bilateral presidential commission for the development of democracy and civil society in Russia.
    Yes, finally !

    If the FSKN experts stated that destroying finished narcotic products in Afghanistan is certainly great, but not as great as completely eliminating poppy plantations themselves, then DEA immediately included “I don’t understand yours.” Like, if all poppy plantations are destroyed, then what then will the Afghan peasants exist, because poppy can still be useful for baking them ...
    If all poppy plantations are destroyed, then what will the American soldiers exist for, apparently this was meant?
    1. krisostomus
      -1
      February 2 2013
      I do not think that such a decision by Russia can be called correct, since it is better to at least somehow cooperate than not to cooperate at all, and especially to curb the spread of drugs. And even more so on the eve of the withdrawal of international coalition troops from Afghanistan.
      It's no secret that the main source of livelihood for the rural population of Afghanistan is poppy cultivation, and therefore the destruction of poppy fields would simply cause "active" discontent among the population and increase the social base of the Taliban, which, of course, absolutely no one is interested in. Therefore, the peasants are allowed to calmly grow this poppy, sell and receive their income, especially since no one carries the poppy to Russia as well as to other countries. That is why the blows are being dealt on heroin producers, finished goods warehouses, caravans and according to daily ISAF reviews, they are quite tangible. But the main thing is that the rural population is already cared for, since they received their money and the rest does not bother them much. Producers, on the other hand, incur heavy losses - they paid for the raw materials and the goods were confiscated.
      Well, when the coalition troops leave, it is quite clear that the Taliban will not be able to offer any other alternative to growing poppies to the rural population if they do not want to undermine their social base, and the Taliban certainly does not want this. And whether the Taliban will be able and willing to seize the finished heroin is not clear. So far, this is a fairly significant source of funding for his activities for him, since the rural population regularly pays him "tribute", as, obviously, the producers and traders of heroin.
      Be that as it may, but in 10 years the Americans have created there some kind of agent network with informants. That Russia will be able to independently oppose the flow of drugs through its "transparent" borders with the republics of Central Asia and the same "transparent" borders of these republics with Afghanistan - we'll wait and see.
  31. WW3
    WW3
    +2
    February 1 2013
    Amers cultivate drug trafficking there in Afghanistan and guard opium plantations. This muck then goes in different ways to the CIS countries, the main direction of course in the EU. I have already suggested that "friend of the United States" Hugo Chavez should throw up an idea of ​​how to stimulate drug trafficking from Colombia to the United States. There, this foolishness is no less than in Afghanistan and through Cuba and Mexico-let the amers play the fool.
  32. +2
    February 1 2013
    "It is safe to say that today the relationship between Russia and the United States is one of the most difficult over the past decade."
    The best friend of our blowers of all levels (Carnegie) said: many people think that life is simple. They are wrong. It is even simpler.
    Our classic ace Pushkin in the work, the captain’s daughter, postulated the following point of view: it’s better to eat meat for 30 years than 300 years (the approximate life of American democracy) as carrion.
    God save us from friends like the Anglo-Saxons with their "overload". We will somehow get rid of the enemies ourselves.
  33. +3
    February 1 2013
    USA country planetary parasite, fetid boil !!! So that it failed !!!
  34. Nil
    +3
    February 1 2013
    In fact, the whole trouble is in people, in ourselves. If you live righteously, honor your faith, traditions, parents, no force in the world will force you to use drugs or other psychoactive substances. Take care of the honor from the young and temper the body - this is the motto of our ancestors, their honor and praise for the fact that we can communicate here with you.
  35. stranik72
    +1
    February 1 2013
    I would love to read the news about Russia's withdrawal from the 1972 treaty on missile defense (the United States withdrew from it in early 2000).
  36. 0
    February 1 2013
    WHO WILL BE HELPED BY THE OMIRIKAN COMMANDOFANIA, THAT WILL BE OBTAINED ONE CROFK ......... AND WHO DOES NOT HELP WILL BE OBTAINED WITH....S .... SSSS ... SALLO !!!!!! YAYAA SALUPA .............. !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
  37. wax
    0
    February 2 2013
    In 2002, there was still no reason not to trust the Americans and, accordingly, the conditions, but now we have all the grounds and, accordingly, the conditions to send them in general and in particular in three letters according to their abbreviation. Now let the fifth column, led by its employer, try to constructively shout that Russia supports terrorism around the world, that it closes itself with an iron curtain against "brotherly" assistance in the fight against child pornography, drug trafficking, and so on. It is one thing to know in thoughts, another thing is to operate with facts, and not with individual particulars, but systematically.
    1. 0
      February 2 2013
      How can we send them if they hold our gold and foreign exchange reserves? They hold us for our eggs, the question is, who invented such a situation and who does not change anything in this matter or does not want to change?
  38. 0
    February 2 2013
    "The rescue of the drowning is the business of the drowning themselves!" We need to create a real southern border! And put things in order inside the country: if we are talking about an epidemic of drug addiction, then the measures must be extraordinary! There are whole neighborhoods where they sell potions (we know that mostly gypsies) - to cordon off a total search with dogs, etc. To tighten laws, to introduce a complete confiscation of property, if they suddenly cannot confirm its legal origin, drug narcotics are forced to be treated in specialist. labor camps.
  39. almamatkulov
    0
    February 2 2013
    If the authorities wanted to cope with Afghan drugs, the Russian Academy of Sciences would have long ago received a task to develop a highly selective virus that infects only drug weed. One spraying - and in a couple of months nothing but "good crops" will be able to grow in the fields.
  40. elenavl
    0
    February 2 2013
    Thanks for this! I’m even ready to give money!))
  41. -3
    February 2 2013
    REPORT OF THE CHAIRMAN OF THE KOLKHOZ "BACK TO THE FUTURE" --- LAST YEAR OUR KOLKHOZ PLANTED 10 HA HEMP, THE CURSED ANASHISTS SMOKE EVERYTHING ................... IN THE NEXT YEAR, OUR KOLKHOZ WILL PLANT 100 hectares of HEMP, LET THE CURSED ANASHISTS FOOT !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! laughing laughing laughing
  42. e-froloff
    0
    February 2 2013
    He wrote everything correctly. But where did the authorities look before?
  43. 0
    February 3 2013
    In Western universities, political science departments are bursting with the number of students and the money allocated for these studies. Do you think they are studying in order to deliver international aid to starving children? They finance only what they receive income from, this is the iron principle of the capitalist economy. We are very naive when we think that they want to help someone. Now think about why they funded the program mentioned in the article. Think of other programs such as small business development, from which it is no coincidence that there was never any good. And remind me of at least one case in history when Russia benefited from "cooperation" with syshua. After 20 years of close "cooperation" nostalgia takes over the "iron wall".
  44. kukuruzo
    0
    February 3 2013
    all this cooperation is imaginary .. and so for reporting .. The West is a closed club that Russia will never get into ... because they don’t need employees, they need servants ... and they only know their interests ... for their achievements they are even ready to promise cooperation not to mention Russia ... to such insignificant countries as Georgia, Uzbekistan, etc. In addition, in order to overthrow the government, rob and impose their will on the world, you need a good excuse .. such as deterring evil Russia, so that as employees we are not even beneficial to them
  45. 0
    February 5 2013
    Clear and consistent policy. Cap the beast is also trainable. Do not forgive anything. The Pithecanthropus principle works here. "If you give a jar of jam, they will demand more, if you show a stick, they will respect you.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"